Presentación Fundamentos de Investigación
-
Upload
little-popcorn -
Category
Technology
-
view
195 -
download
1
Transcript of Presentación Fundamentos de Investigación
PALOMA TORROBA 1, Mª Pilar Zaldívar García2, Mª Belén Fernández-Santos3 & Carolina Martínez-Ruiz1,4
1Area of Ecology, Department of Agro-Forestry Sciences, University of Valladolid, Spain. E-mail: [email protected] of Botany, Department of Agro-Forestry Sciences, University of Valladolid, Spain3Area of Ecology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Salamanca, Spain 4Sustainable Forest Management Research Institute UVa-INIA (Spain)
12th EEF Congress. Avila 2011
Characterize the natural regeneration of sessile oak (Quercus petraea) in three microhabitats present in the study area
Characterize the natural regeneration of sessile oak (Quercus petraea) in three microhabitats present in the study area
Hydric stress
Dry season
Low water holding capacity
Hydric stress
Dry season
Low water holding capacity
B - the adjacent oak forest edge
M1 - the restored mine area close to the forest
M2 - the restored mine area away from forest
B - the adjacent oak forest edge
M1 - the restored mine area close to the forest
M2 - the restored mine area away from forest
Soil characteristics
Forest influence
Seed arrival
M1 M2B
12 m12 m 6 m6 m 8 m8 m
5.7 % shrub cover/plot
5.7 % shrub cover/plot 70.0 % s.c./plot70.0 % s.c./plot 61.0 % s.c./plot61.0 % s.c./plot
Environmental gradient
BM1 M2
Seedling density (ind./m2)
Maximum alive height (<50 cm)
Diameter (mm)
Nº of total and dead branches
Age range (1, 2-3, >3 years old)
Presence of moss
% shrub cover/plot
Angle of contact
% shrub cover around seedlings
60 plots, 2 x 2 m2
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
% shrub cover around seedlings
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
% s
eed
lin
gs
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
nº
seed
lin
gs
1020
3040
5060
7080
90100
% shrub cover around seedlings
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
% s
eed
lin
gs
050100150200250300350400450500550600650
nº
seed
lin
gs
1020
3040
5060
7080
90100
% shrub cover around seedlings
0%
4%
8%
12%
16%
20%
24%
28%
32%
% s
eed
lin
gs
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
nº
seed
lin
gs
% s
hru
b c
ove
r a
rou
nd
see
dli
ng
s%
sh
rub
co
ver
aro
un
d s
eed
lin
gs
53% 80%
χ2=256.26; gl=18; p<0.0001; Chi-square test
97%
Shrub protection B M1 M2 Kruskal-Wallis test
Average angle (º) 3.3 147.7 241.7 H=996.1; gl=2; p<0.0001
Average% shrub cover 11.7 72.9 83.1 H=701.0; gl=2; p<0.0001
3060
90120
150180
210240
270300
330360
angle of contact (º)
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
75%
90%%
see
dlin
gs
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
nº
see
dlin
gs
3060
90120
150180
210240
270300
330360
angle of contact (º)
0%
4%
8%
12%
16%
20%
24%
28%
% s
ee
dli
ng
s
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
nº
se
ed
lin
gs
3060
90120
150180
210240
270300
330360
angle of contact (º)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
% s
ee
dli
ng
s
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
nº
se
ed
lin
gs
49% 43%99%
χ2=232.90; gl=22; p<0.0001; Chi-square test
B M1 M2
B M1 M2
An
gle
of
con
tact
An
gle
of
con
tact
Shrub protectionShrub protection
B M1 M2
m icrohabitat
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
de
ns
ity
(in
d/m
2 )
Seedling characteristicsSeedling characteristics
16.3 ind./m2
3.1 ind./m2
0.7 ind./m2
Density (ind./m2)Density (ind./m2)
a
b
c
B
M2
Wald st.=256.97; gl=2; p<0.0001; ANOVA based on Poisson distribution
S.E. 20)(n X
B M 1 M 2
m icrohabitat
0,15
0,20
0,25
0,30
0,35
0,40
0,45
0,50
0,55
0,60
1-y
ea
r-o
ld s
ee
dlin
g d
en
sit
y (
ind
./m2 )
1 year old 2-3 years old >3 years oldB M 1 M 2
microhabitat
0
20
40
60
80
100
% s
eed
ling
s
density
youth
regeneration=
Environmental conditions get worse
Lower survival
Age structureAge structure
χ2=65.47; gl=4; p<0.0001; Chi-square testF(2, 57) = 0.47; p = 0.629; ANOVA
1-year-old seedling density1-year-old seedling densityB (n=1307 ind.)M1 (n=248)M2 (n=60) B (n=20 plots)
M1 (n= 20)M2 (n=20)
B M 1 M 2m icrohabitat
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
3,5
4,0
dia
met
er (
mm
)
B M 1 M 2m icrohabitat
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
hei
gh
t (c
m)
a a
b
ab
a
b
B: r=0.60; M1: r=0.79; M2: r=0.66 (p<0.0001)
Height (cm)Height (cm)
Light level
Forest influenceM1: Higher size and Pearson´s coefficient (r)
H=37.07; gl=2; p<0.0001; Kruskal-Wallis test
H=7.98; gl=2; p=0.0185; Kruskal-Wallis test
Diameter (mm)Diameter (mm)
± S.E.
B (n=1307)M1 (n=248)M2 (n=60)
X
B M 1 M 2
m icrohabitat
0
10
20
30
40
50
% d
ea
d b
ran
ch
es
B M1 M2
m icrohabitat
0
1
2
3
4
5
nº
of
tota
l b
ran
ch
es
a
c
b% damaged seedlings
6% 6% 1 year-old seedling (n=84 ind.)
77.1% 77.1% seedling in the whole sample (n=1345 ind.)
% damaged seedlings
6% 6% 1 year-old seedling (n=84 ind.)
77.1% 77.1% seedling in the whole sample (n=1345 ind.)
a
b
a
Number of total branchesNumber of total branches
M2:YoungerMore shrub protection
B:OlderLess shrub protection
H=16.34; gl=2; p=0.0003; Kruskal-Wallis test
H=40.99; gl=2; p<0.0001; Kruskal-Wallis test
% dead branches% dead branches
± S.E.
B (n=1307 ind.)M1 (n=248)M2 (n=60)
X
± S.E.
B (n=1307 ind.)M1 (n=248)M2 (n=60)
X
Herbivory damageHerbivory damage
M2:YoungerMore shrub protection
B:OlderLess shrub protection
Less density
More densityB M1 M2
m icrohabitat
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22d
en
sit
y (
ind
/m2 )
a
bc
B M 1 M 2
microhabitat
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
% p
rese
nce
of
mo
ss
Environmental conditions:
Hydric stress
Environmental conditions:
Hydric stress
a
a
b
Moss presence around seedlings
increases
Moss presence around seedlings
increases
% moss presence per plot% moss presence per plot
(n=20) ± S.E.XH=17.82; gl=2; p=0.0001; Kruskal-Wallis test
Nº of seedlings surrounded by moss in each microhabitat considered.
Aspect influence (North aspect, South aspect)Aspect influence (North aspect, South aspect)
South aspect
North aspect
South aspect North aspect
N
Sou th asp e ct No rth asp e ct
asp e ct
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45d
en
sit
y (
ind
/m2
)
South aspect N orth aspect
aspect
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
dia
me
ter
(mm
)
South aspect North aspect
aspect
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
hei
gh
t (c
m)
a
b
Density (ind./m2)Density (ind./m2)
Height (cm)Height (cm)
a
b
33.3 ind./m2
9.1 ind./m2
U=6.00; gl= p=0.003; Mann-Whitney U test
t=-12.70; gl=1303; p<0.0001 t=-7.51; gl=1304; p<0.0001
a
b
9.2 cm12.4 cm 2.60 mm3.04 mm
± S.E.North aspect (n=14)South aspect (n=6)
X
Diameter (mm)Diameter (mm)
North aspect (n=509 ind.)
South aspect (n=798)
t-Student test
± S.E.X
North aspect:•Lower density and size
South aspect:•Higher survival•Higher size
north aspect south aspect
aspect
0,0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
1-ye
ar-o
ld s
eed
lin
g d
ensi
ty (
ind
./m
2 )
1-year-old seedling density (ind./m2)1-year-old seedling density (ind./m2)
North aspect:•Lower density and size
South aspect:•Higher survival•Higher size
U=19.5; p=0.053; Mann-Whitney U test
± S.E.North aspect (n=14)South aspect (n=6)
X
1. Seedling survival is strongly related with the environmental gradient (density, age)
2. Hydric stress seems to affect seedling survival more than herbivory damage
3. Light level could explain differences in seedling size among microhabitats, while age and shrub protection may influence branch mortality
4. In forest microhabitat, aspect is a parameter which influences oak regeneration (ecological requirements)