Predictive Modeling in Underwriting
-
Upload
kevin-pledge -
Category
Business
-
view
1.155 -
download
4
Transcript of Predictive Modeling in Underwriting
Predictive Modeling in UnderwritingBARRY SENENSKY FSA, FCIA, MAAA14 Oct 2015
1
Agenda
1. Why has it taken so long?2. Predictive Modeling Approaches3. Data Sources4. Building the Predictive Model5. Summary
2
Why has it taken so long?
A long time coming…Predictive Modeling has been used in Industry for 50+ yearsPredictive Modeling has been used by P&C Insurers for 20+ yearsPredictive Modeling has been used for scoring Disability Claims on the likelihood of recovery for over 10 yearsSo why not Underwriting?1. Life Insurance business is conservative/slow to change2. Results take 5-‐10 years to become apparent
4
So why now?
Availability of Data and CPU’s to process the dataFits well with Online Insurance Sales where companies are looking for less expensive, less intrusive and quicker ways to sell insurance policiesJust makes too much sense
5
Predictive Modeling Approaches
6
Predictive Modeling Approaches
1. Replicate Current Underwriting Decisions2. Model mortality rates directly for unique
applicants
7
Data Sources
8
1. Internal
2. Third Party
3. Customer’s own
Internal Data Sources
1. Data Collected from current underwriting practices2. Application• Provides good underwriting information • May have material inaccuracies
3. Fluids and other medical tests/information• Provides good underwriting information • Slow and expensive to collect • Poor customer experience
9
Third Party Data
Includes data about an individual obtained from a third party including data; • Purchased from data aggregator such as
LexisNexis• Purchased from another company that has the
individual as a customer such as a pharmacy or telecommunications provider
• Scraped off the web such as from Linked in or Facebook
10
Third Party Data
Advantages• Quick to obtain • Low cost• Physically Non-‐invasive
Concerns • Reliability and completeness of data• Customer Privacy
11
Customers’ Own Data
• Includes data collected from EHR’s, wearable devices and wellness programs• Early indications are positive for Auto Insurance • Skeptical of value in near future for Life Insurance Underwriting
12
Building the Predictive Model
Two Possible Approaches
1. Replicate current underwriting decisions2. Model mortality rates directly for unique
individuals
14
Replicate Current Underwriting Decisions Possible Objectives• Enhance consistency of decisions between underwriters• Identify predictive data fields• Replace existing process with one that is quicker cheaper
Advantages• Historical experience is not required• Fairly straightforward to develop
Issues• Maintains but does not improve underwriting decisions• Issue of how to keep current over time
15
Modeling Mortality Rates DirectlyObjectives• Identify predictive data fields• Replace existing process with one that is quicker and cheaper• Predict applicant specific mortality rates
Advantages• Should improve underwriting decisions and profitability of business
Issues• Need historical experience for all applicants • How do you get vital status? • Many modeling issues
16
Modeling Mortality Rates Directly-‐Modeling Issues• Build a model from scratch or start with a standard table? • How many years from issue do we model? Then what?• How do we incorporate mortality improvement?
17
Smaller Company Issues
• Accumulating large enough data sets to build credible models• Higher unit cost of building infrastructure
18
Ongoing Management
• Need to periodically refresh models• Predictive models are good at assessing benefits of questions on applications and medical tests
19
Summary
20
Summary
• Predictive Modeling in Underwriting has arrived • If you haven’t done so yet;
ØNeed to decide how you want to incorporate into your underwriting process
Øidentify and start collecting relevant data
21
22