Predicting flow performance and contact stresses … · Predicting flow performance and contact...
Transcript of Predicting flow performance and contact stresses … · Predicting flow performance and contact...
Predicting flow performance and contact stresses
in a gerotor pump
Neenad Wamane
November 14, 2016
Stanadyne Confidential
Predicting flow performance and contact stresses in a gerotor
pump
Copyright © Stanadyne 2016
Outline
Introduction
Objective of the work
Method to achieve the objectives
Model configuration in GT-SUITE
Flow model
Test setup and instrumentation
Model results and validation
Dynamic pressure and flow match
Pressure regulator selection
Power breakdown – viscous drag and fluid power
Mechanical model for Hertz contact stress prediction
Inputs to mechanical model
Contact forces and Hertz stress
Summary and conclusions
2Stanadyne Confidential
Copyright © Stanadyne 2016
Introduction
Gerotors are widely used in automotive for oil and fuel supply systems
Cost effective and works well with wide range of fluid viscosities
Gerotor operating principle
Fluid drawn into and squeezed out of cavity formed by inner and outer rotor
3Stanadyne Confidential
Outer rotorInner rotor
Outlet
kidney
Inlet kidney
Copyright © Stanadyne 2016
Objective of the work
4Stanadyne Confidential
To size the gerotor and regulator to achieve low speed and high speed
pump performance requirements
Challenges
Low speed leakage and flow output
Flow regulation at high speed
Over stressing of teeth at high speed
Copyright © Stanadyne 2016
Method to achieve the objectives
1. Flow model
Modeling of the gerotor pump and regulator performance
Validation of the model with test data
Study the dynamics of pressure and flow pulsations for pressure regulator
sizing
2. Mechanical model
Apply loading from flow model to the gerotor teeth
Predict the Hertzian contact stresses
To select appropriate material
5Stanadyne Confidential
Copyright © Stanadyne 2016
Flow model generation from CAD geometry
6Stanadyne Confidential
3D CAD model imported
to GT-SPACECLAIM
Volume and area profile
generation in GEM3D
1D GT model
Copyright © Stanadyne 2016
GT-SUITE flow model
7Stanadyne Confidential
Flow model
Delivery pressure (bar)
Flow (L/min)
Orifice diameter varied to meet the average delivery
pressure targets at different speeds
Copyright © Stanadyne 2016
Test setup and instrumentation
High speed pressure transducers to study
pressure ripple
High resolution flow rate measurement
Gerotor isolated from pump for testing
A valve is used to impose the desired outlet
pressures at different speeds
8Stanadyne Confidential
Pump Speed
(rpm)
Pressure
(psi-a)
500 50
1000 81
1500 88
2000 93
2500 102
3000 105
Pressure
measurement
Flow meter
Valve to
create load
Copyright © Stanadyne 2016
Instantaneous pressure comparison
9Stanadyne Confidential
Good consistency between
simulation and measured
delivery instantaneous
pressures
Fluid parameter "Time
Constant for free =>
dissolved“ tuned for high
speeds
Copyright © Stanadyne 2016
Flow comparison
10Stanadyne Confidential
The flow correlates well for all conditions Volumetric efficiency within 2% of test data
Copyright © Stanadyne 2016
Pressure regulator selection
Calibrated flow model used to optimize
pressure regulator
- Spool valve geometry
- Piston diameter
- Spill hole size
- Spring selection
- Rate
- Preload
- Will be looking into resonant
frequencies of the regulator valve
11Stanadyne Confidential
Copyright © Stanadyne 2016
Power breakdown prediction – viscous drag and fluid power
12Stanadyne Confidential
Viscous drag increases with decrease in
temperature
Gerotor friction object to calculate the viscous drag
Copyright © Stanadyne 2016
Mechanical model for Hertz contact stress prediction
Objective
To predict the Hertzian stresses to understand the pressure withstanding limits of gerotor
Methodology
Feed the mechanical model with loading inputs from the flow model
Inner rotor tooth profile
Outer rotor approximated circle
Material properties of inner and outer rotor
Run the model to see contact forces and stresses
13Stanadyne Confidential
Copyright © Stanadyne 2016
Inputs to mechanical model
14Stanadyne Confidential
Forces on the shaft
imposed on inner
and outer rotor
Approximated
circle
Single tooth
profile
Material properties
for both rotors
1D flow
model
Copyright © Stanadyne 2016
Contact forces and Hertz stress
15Stanadyne Confidential
Resultant force vectors show majority
of the load is taken by the bearings
The 150 N spikes at the contacts correspond to the
240 MPa (34,800 psi) contact stress
Copyright © Stanadyne 2016
Summary and conclusion
GT-SUITE 1D model was built and prediction of dynamic pressure and flow correlated
well with experimental results.
The time constant for free air to dissolve in liquid, significantly affected the dynamic
pressure amplitude.
Time constant of 2 seconds best matched experimental results.
The pressure regulator was designed and optimized using the flow model.
Regulator testing results matched the predicted performance from GT-SUITE.
Loading contact forces are carried mostly by the bearings.
Hertzian contact stresses were predicted using mechanical modeling and the gerotor
material was found to be suitable to withstand those stresses.
16Stanadyne Confidential
Copyright © Stanadyne 2016
Thank you
Thank you for your attention
Special thanks to -
Mark Cavanagh and Peter Hasiuk from Stanadyne
Rodrigo and Pete from GT support
17Stanadyne Confidential