Precision Ag Councils3.amazonaws.com/aggateway_public/AgGatewayWeb/EventsAndA…Priorities for 2013...
Transcript of Precision Ag Councils3.amazonaws.com/aggateway_public/AgGatewayWeb/EventsAndA…Priorities for 2013...
Precision Ag Council
June 18, 2013
1:00 PM-3:00 PM
2
PAC PRIORITIES FOR 2013 AS PRESENTED AT 2012 ANNUAL MEETING
Priorities for 2013
3
• Strengthen our working groups. Recruit leaders
• Glossary • Prepare it for sharing
• Look for long-term home
• Manage SPADE deliverables for success • Includes bringing messages
into Ag Gateway S&G process
• Track results
• Pursue access to CLUs
• Provide a good initial home in Ag Gateway for irrigation & sensor companies • Explore standards project
• Re-launch Telematics Working Group
• Launch SPADE 2 if needed
• Cross-Council Operation • Data Privacy and Security
• Glossary
4
Most Important Goal: Ensure YOU are satisfied with your AgGateway experience!
PAC Field Operations Working Group
Jill Stanford (John Deere)
Jaap Van Bergeijk (AGCO)
Field Ops Working Group Update
• A Year in Review (MYM 2012-2013) • Small group drafted a charter “Precision Ag Standards Using Seeding Use Case”
• Spring Working Group Mtg (April 5) Data Exchange Charter vote/approval
• Several additional companies joined from original 15
• Official kick off in Ankeny, IA - August 2012
• Project formally named:
SPADE (Standardized Precision Ag Data Exchange)
http://wiki.aggateway.org/Spade%20Project.MainPage.ashx
• Industry Collaboration • April 26, 2013 – Presented SPADE results at ISO AEF PG9 FMIS Working Group
• ISO WG9 & WG5 have requested AgGateway feedback on proposed standards
6
FOWG Goals/Objectives
7
• Working Group Goals and Objectives • Short term: Identify existing use case/needs and focus on a specific use case
(Seeding Example Selected June 2011 – Chartered SPADE project). Identify existing standards and gaps/needs.
• 2013 - Focus on Harvest use case SPADE 2
• Medium term: Reach consensus on standard needs and adopt existing standard/propose additional changes to this standard or develop an AgGateway standard in order to meet the need.
• Long term: As needs of the industry evolve, continue to work as a group in order to build upon the standard.
• Examples – Upcoming WG5 Standards for Operation/Tasks/Jobs and WG9 ISO DL. Review and provide feedback to AEF.
Mid Year Meeting, 2013
Joe W. Tevis, PhD (Topcon Precision Ag)
SPADE Project Chair [email protected]
8
SPADE PROJECT
9
SPADE Standardized Precision Ag Data Exchange
10
SPADE1 Scope
SPADE1 Project Timeline
• SPADE Charter Approved July 2012
• Project Kick-off – Des Moines 10 August, 2012
• Face-to-Face – AGCO, Atlanta 2 October, 2012
• Winter Meeting, Albuquerque 6 November, 2012
• SPADE1 Project End 20 June, 2013
Major Accomplishments/Status
12
Deliverable Requirements Design Implementation
Reference Data Access
Seeds 90% 80% 70%
Machinery 60% 50% 40%
CVT 40% 0% 0%
USDA Interface 20% 0% 0%
ISO Enhancements
FMIS<-> FMISPlan Development 70% 50% 10%
Historical Data 60% 40% 0%
FMIS<-> MICS 95% 80% 0%
Phase Status/Complettion %
13
SPADE2
14
SPADE2 Scope
SPADE2 Project Timeline
• Board Approves Project 30 April, 2013
• Commitment Letter Sent 30 May, 2013
• Commitment Closure 30 June ,2013
• Project Kick-off 20 June, 2013
• Panel Discussion - InfoAg 17 July, 2013
• Winter Meeting 14 Nov, 2013
• Last Day to Join 30 Nov, 2013
• SPADE2 Closed Feb, 2014
SPADE2 16
• Carry all aspects of SPADE1 to implementation
• Expand focus to: • Production reporting not covered in SPADE (harvest, crop protection,
fertilization, tillage)
• Creating infrastructure to deliver SPADE reference data
• Continue USDA Cooperation • Revisit SPADE documents when they release their reporting schemas
• Seek resolution to CLU – Management field conflict
• “Open Source” data translation proof of concept
AgGateway Proposal
• All MICS manufacturers export and import ISO+AG format,
• Open Source component translates to-from ISO+AG format to ISO+AG FMIS data model (TBD)
• Each FMIS manufacturer translates to-from ISO+AG FMIS data model to their proprietary data model.
Translators from ISO+AG Data Model to Proprietary data
models
Transfer Documents(ISO+AG Compliant)
Work Orders
Plans
Work Records
Open Source Repository
FMIS Data Model(ISO+AG Complint TBD)
Open S
ourc
e T
ransl
ato
r
! WorkerIdRef? <AllocationStamp>
WorkerAllocation (WAN)
@ WorkerId! WorkerDesignator
? WorkerFirstName
? WorkerAddress
? WorkerPhone
? WorkerLicenseNumber
Worker (WKR)
@ CodedCommentGroupId
! CodedCommentGroupDesignator
CodedCommentGroup (CCG)
! WorkingSetMasterNAMEValue
? WorkingSetMasterNAMEMask? DeviceIdRef
? <AllocationStamp>
DeviceAllocation (DAN)
@ DeviceId
? DeviceDesignator
? DeviceSoftwareVersion! WorkingSetMasterNAME
? DeviceSerialNumber
? DeviceStructureLabel
? DeviceLocalizationLabel
! <DeviceElement>? <DeviceProcessData>
? <DeviceProperty>
? <DeviceValuePresentation>
Device (DVC)
@ DeviceElementId
! DeviceElementObjectId
! DeviceElementType? DeviceElementDesignator
! DeviceElementNumber
! ParentObjectId
? <DeviceObjectReference>
DeviceElement (DET)
! DataLogDDI
! DataLogValue! DeviceElementIdRef
? DataLogPGN
? DataLogPGNStartBit
? DataLogPGNStopBit
DataLogValue (DLV)
! DeviceIdRef_0
! DeviceElementIdRef_0
! DeviceIdRef_1
! DeviceElementIdRef_1
Connection (CNN)
@ CodedCommentListValueId
! CodedCommentListValueDesignator
CodedCommentListValue (CCL)
connector
@DeviceProcessDataObjectId
! ProcessDataDDI
! ProcessDataProperty
! ProcessDataTriggerMethods? ProcessDataDesignator
? DeviceValuePresentationObjectId
DeviceProcessData (DPD)
! PositionNorth
! PositionEast
? PositionUp! PositionStatus
? PDOP
? HDOP
? NumberOfSatellites
? GpsUtcTime? GpsUtcDate
Position (PTN)
@ CodedCommentId
! CodedCommentDesignator
? <CodedCommentListValue>
! CodedCommentScope ? CodedCommentGroupIdRef
CodedComment (CCT)
! {Start | Stop}
? Duration
! Type? <Position>
AllocationStamp (ASP)
Translator FMIS Company I
Translator FMIS Company II
Translator FMIS Company III
Translator FMIS Company IV
FMIS Company I
FMIS Company II
FMIS Company III
FMIS Company IV
Proposal Value Proposition
• Easier for FMIS companies to integrate by handling complex operation,
• Creation and translation of binaries,
• Creation and interpretation of implement device configurations
• Grid types
• Promote adoption of the standard
• Version management
• Coordinate system conversion???
• Promote standard construction of complex device configurations
• TC-FMIS “Conformance” test
SPADE2 Contacts
19
For More Information:
Joe Tevis ([email protected]) Andres Ferreyra ([email protected])
Also see:
“SPADE Project Update”
To Join SPADE2:
Jim Wilson ([email protected])
Your source for eBusiness innovation.
20
THANK YOU
PAIL: Precision Ag Irrigation Leadership
Partnership for Faster, Broader Data Standards Development
Dan Berne (Next Chapter Marketing)
Precision Ag Irrigation Leadership (PAIL) 22
Jointly sponsored • NW Energy Efficiency Alliance
• AgGateway
Driven by business needs • Growers and Manufacturers
CHARTER Provide a common set of data standards and formats to convert weather, soil moisture and other relevant data from OEM hardware and software programs to be used by irrigation data analysis and prescription programs.
Today’s Standalone Tools Don’t Integrate
LOCALIZED HARDWARE
Weather stations Moisture sensors Pumping plants Smart meters Flow valves
EXTERNAL DATA SOURCES Soil maps Weather
networks
ONLINE ADVISORY SYSTEMS
Crop type ET Schedules Weather SIS
IRRIGATION SCHEDULING
TOOLS VRI SIS
Companies Onboard
Ag Connections Agrian AgSense Campbell Scientific CropIMS Crop Metrics Decagon Irrinet Irrometer
John Deere Water Lindsay Corporation Map Shots Monsanto OnFarm Systems Ranch Systems Simplot Wysocki ZedX, Inc.
Progress to Date 25
• Charter completed
• Business use cases completed
• Technical use cases underway (PAIL wiki)
• Inbound Data
• Set-up and Configuration
• Field Operations Data
• Offsite Data
• Building engagement and trust
Strategies & Challenges 26
• Focus on center pivot irrigation for phase 1
• Define data needs around business and technical use cases
• Include growers on the team
• Leverage existing standards wherever possible
• Use virtual testing before approval
• Reaching agreement while protecting IP
• Multiple sources for offsite data, such as weather forecasting and crop coefficients
• Limited time and resources
Next Steps 27
• Complete technical use cases (Mid-July)
• Define datasets and terms (Sept.)
• Document business rules (Sept.)
• Draft data standards (Nov)
• Virtual test
• Approve and document (March 2014)
PAIL: PRECISION AG IRRIGATION LEADERSHIP
Partnership for Faster, Broader Data Standards Development
28
+
Telematics Working Group
2013 Mid Year Meeting Update
Project WAVE
Ben Studer (AGCO)
30
Combine 3 Needs to Unload –
Location Field 1
Tractor 2 Can Unload Combine 3 – Need Fuel – Location Field 4
Fuel to Tractor 2 Location Field 4
Bin 2 Full – Fill Bin 3 –
16% Moisture on
Bin 1
Grain Truck 5 – Fill Bin 3
Running in Field 6 - Need to reload
Scheduled to Run at 1PM
Current temperature
100
Opportunities for collaboration?
32
What Comes Next?
33
Date Milestone
June 2013 Charter sent out for discussion
June 2013 Project charter discussed in detail. Goals, objectives, scope and deliverables agreed upon. Project budget discussed. Funding alternatives proposed. Project charter submitted to Precision Ag Council for approval.
July 2013 Project charter approved.
August 2013 Project Team Launch. Working groups launch. Sub-Teams working; detailed schedules
September 2013 F2f Meeting - TBA
November 2013 AgGateway Annual Meeting. Project will have a demonstration / presentation session associated with the Precision Ag Council program.
March 2014 F2f Meeting - TBA
June 2014 AgGateway Mid-Year Meeting Phase 1 complete. Deliverables communicated.
June 2014 Phase 2 Charter sent out for discussion
34
Thank You
Data Access Points
Cloud (Gateway to machines) Cloud (Gateway
to machines) Cloud (Gateway to machines)
CASE Vehicle
CNH Display Trimble
FMIS or Portal
Proxy
Value Added Services
Machine Directory
JD Vehicle
JD Display
AGCO Vehicle
AGCO Display AM50
JD Vehicle
Raven MTG
MTG 2
1
3
4
Data Security, Privacy & Protection
Deb Casurella (Independent Data Management)
GOAL
The Data Security, Privacy & Protection working group will define standards and guidelines for securing and protecting information. These guidelines will strive to prevent an error in an unsupervised marketplace which could jeopardize the benefits gained by using data collected during field operations.
2013 Mid Year Meeting 37
Accomplishments & Next Steps
Accomplishments
• Defined working group objective
• Updated glossary definitions
• Drafted stakeholders
• Drafted initial security, privacy & protection principles
Next Steps
1. Discussion of initial content on Wednesday from 7:30 – 9:30 in Canada & Mexico Rooms
2. Develop white paper for PA Council review
38
Insurance, Regulation, and Government Relations Working Group
Mid Year Meeting June 18, 2013, 7:30 – 9:30 a.m.
Johnston, IA
Jeff Keiser (John Deere)
2013 IRG Working Group Goals
40
• Collaborate with USDA (e.g. FSA, RMA, NRCS) to create a field identification approach for which sufficient details can be shared with the farmer’s service providers as a standard spatial reference to crop production areas, but does not expose a producer’s Personally Identifiable Information (PII) or other Private Information related to their participation with USDA programs
• Spearhead a cross-Council initiative to capture Data Privacy & Protection concerns from across AgGateway and the ag industry and then create project proposal to design AgGateway’s position and establish its leadership role
IRG Work Summary: To Date, 2013
• IRG Meetings • 3/14/2013
• 4/30/2013
• Data Privacy & Ownership WG
• “8 Week” USDA Conference Calls with SPADE
• CLU Discussions and Workshop
41
Common Land Unit Concepts
42
Concept Name Description
Alternative Identifier Create Alternative ID for CLU (Farm/Tract/Field)
or CLUID (36 char. Unique identifier) that can be
managed by a USDA “partner” (e.g. AgGateway)
who is able to provide correlation services back to
CLU’s with associated attributes containing PII
USDA GUID The new GUID being utilized by USDA for MIDAS
Spatial intersection Operational boundaries vs. reporting
boundaries/area
AgGateway Glossary - Purpose The creation and maintenance of a “comprehensive
agriculture glossary” will be a coordination point for the multiple agriculture glossaries that exist by business segment today. This “comprehensive agriculture glossary” will… Provide a solution for communication challenges that occur when
existing identical terms or phrases (term/terms) have different meanings and use.
Establish awareness of a new term; and its context and definition.
Establish a standard term and definition resource for AgGateway Councils, Committees, and Projects to support e-Business communications and transactions.
Establish a standard term and definition resource for ag education and businesses to promote effective and efficient communication and training.
44
AgGateway Glossary – Content Following is an outline of the current content of the
“comprehensive agriculture glossary” spreadsheet. Term
Control Category (CC No.) - defined in the glossary spreadsheet
Category (C No.) – defined in the glossary spreadsheet
Sub-Category (SC No.) - defined in the glossary spreadsheet
Space Name – primary user of term
Definition of Term
Key Words
Synonyms
Related Terms
Lexicon – International
Source / Point of Origin – origin of definition and/or submitter/source of definition
Control Council: AgGateway Council assigned to review / control definition
45
AgGateway Glossary – Format
AgGateway will use Wiki or other easily editable format.
The glossary must contain Search/Advanced Search capability.
The glossary must have the capability of linking.
It is recommended that the glossary have an audio recording of the pronunciation of the term attached to each term.
46
AgGateway Glossary – Commitment
AgGateway will: Commit personnel and resources to the creation and maintenance of the
glossary.
Pursue collaboration with the USDA, ag groups and businesses, academia, and standards organizations.
Post the approved terms glossary on the AgGateway wiki.
Use the glossary in internal communications and Projects.
Use the glossary to promote the execution of its mission to promote, enable, and expand eBusiness in agriculture.
47
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!
QUESTIONS - COMMENTS?
Presented by:
Dennis Daggett
ProAg
June 17, 2013
48
SPADE COMMUNICATIONS WORKING GROUP
Jonelle Lofton (Monsanto)
Susan Ruland (AgGateway)
49
DISCUSSION OF PAC PRIORITIES
Andres Ferreyra (Ag Connections)
PAC Chair
50
Priorities for 2013
51
• Strengthen our working groups. Recruit leaders
• Glossary • Prepare it for sharing
• Look for long-term home
• Manage SPADE deliverables for success • Includes bringing messages
into Ag Gateway S&G process
• Track results
• Pursue access to CLUs
• Provide a good initial home in Ag Gateway for irrigation & sensor companies • Explore standards project
• Re-launch Telematics Working Group
• Launch SPADE 2 if needed
• Cross-Council Operation • Data Privacy and Security
• Glossary
Priorities for 2013: Feedback
52
• Strengthen our working groups. Recruit leaders
• We should start talking about rotating the leadership.
• Glossary
• Challenge to the group to actively look for terms that need to be defined.
• Challenge to be available to help.
• Manage SPADE deliverables for success
• Where does a lifecycle phase end?
Priorities for 2013: Feedback
53
• Pursue access to CLUs • Ongoing work in IRG.
Renewing the white paper
• Provide a good initial home in Ag Gateway for irrigation & sensor companies • Explore standards project
• Hoped we’d be further along, but getting a lot of momentum recently.
• Ag Gateway is providing opportunities for networking.
• Re-launch Telematics Working Group • Cross-pollination
opportunity
• Launch SPADE 2 if needed • In Progress!
• Cross-Council Operation • Will look for increased
presence from Ag Retail.
54
Most Important Goal: Ensure YOU are satisfied with your AgGateway experience!
• Refocus on looking at agriculture as a whole system. • Will keep grower perspective in mind.