Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results;...

22
Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and C ommentary from Participants Boston KM Forum, January 17, 2013 Panel: Lisa O’Donnell (Genzyme/Sanofi), Bert Saul (SGH), Glynys Thomas (The Parthenon Group), Marcie Zaharee (The MITRE Corporation) Moderators: Lynda Moulton and Larry Chait Entire Contents Copyright © 2013 Chait and Associates, Inc.

Transcript of Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results;...

Page 1: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants

Boston KM Forum, January 17, 2013

Panel: Lisa O’Donnell (Genzyme/Sanofi), Bert Saul (SGH), Glynys Thomas (The Parthenon Group), Marcie Zaharee (The MITRE Corporation) Moderators: Lynda Moulton and Larry Chait

Entire Contents Copyright © 2013 Chait and Associates, Inc.

Page 2: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

2

Practical knowledge management…

Page 3: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

3

Survey Respondents said about their Organization’s ability to leverage knowledge

Excellent7%

Good39%

Average41%

Fair7%

Poor6%

Page 4: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

4

Perspective: Knowledge leverage initiatives

Centrality of human beings—Only knowledgeable people can determine appropriate fit of new technologies to knowledge initiatives 

State of flux—Impacts of a changing environment on knowledge processing

Knowledge Leverage is the operational force applied to derive institutional benefit from available and authoritative information resources (expert people, knowledge codified in content, and organizational know-how)

Page 5: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

5

Critical “gut check”Is the knowledge initiative about technology or

does something else need to be addressed first?

Long before technology connectors are acquired or planned for a knowledge opportunity, the leader of a knowledge initiative—and an organization as a whole—must do a serious gut check.

Page 6: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

6

Questions for panel:

The changing environment…

In what ways have changes in the environment impacted how your organization processes knowledge?

For example: Changes in case law and litigation discovery requiring corporate email retention

Page 7: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

7

Critical “gut check”In a “gut check,” ask these questions:

What is the changing business, legal or regulatory environment that calls for an initiative?

Given who you are and what you know, can you and your organization address your knowledge opportunity effectively?

Can the needed people and resources be marshaled?

Can you define and convincingly defend the initiative?

Are you—and the organization—willing to take the risk?

Page 8: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

Critical “gut check”—critical elements People—the “who”—what knowledge and

competencies are needed, and who are the key stakeholders

Goal—the “what”—what is the value proposition; what will the initiative do and how will it provide value?

Scope—the “how big”—how much of the initiative is in whose domain, and what can realistically be accomplished?

8

Page 9: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

9

Questions for panel:

“Gut checks” in your organization…

Has your organization done effective “gut checks” before launching knowledge initiatives?

If so, to what advantage?

If not, with what consequences?

Page 10: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

10

Survey Respondents Think Major KM Challenges Are:

Finding knowledge when needed

22%

Sharing knowledge effectively

31%

Organizing and managing

knowledge as-sets25%

Accessing knowl-edge with tech-nology support

6%

Hoarding knowledge

2%

Other14%

Page 11: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

11

Survey: Important attributes for KM leaders

Dee

p kn

owle

dge

of th

e bu

sine

ss

Exce

llent

com

mun

icat

ion

skill

s

Trus

ted

by o

ther

s

Resp

ecte

d by

top

man

agem

ent

Solv

es d

ifficu

lt pr

oble

ms

Dee

p co

nnec

tions

to e

xper

ts

Cont

ent m

anag

emen

t exp

ert,

rese

arch

er, i

nfor

mat

ion

scie

ntist

Expe

rienc

e br

ingi

ng c

haot

ic

prog

ram

s un

der c

ontrol

Subj

ect-m

atte

r exp

ertis

e

Expe

rtise

in IT

25

15

5

Out of 50 – Multiple Answers per respondent

Page 12: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

12

Survey: Important attributes for KM team members

Dee

p kn

owle

dge

of th

e bu

sine

ss

Exce

llent

com

mun

icat

ion

skill

s

Trus

ted

by o

ther

s

Resp

ecte

d by

top

man

agem

ent

Solv

es d

ifficu

lt pr

oble

ms

Dee

p co

nnec

tions

to e

xper

ts

Cont

ent m

anag

emen

t exp

ert,

rese

arch

er, i

nfor

mat

ion

scie

ntist

Expe

rienc

e br

ingi

ng c

haot

ic

prog

ram

s un

der c

ontrol

Subj

ect-m

atte

r exp

ertis

e

Expe

rtise

in IT

Out of 50 – Multiple Answers per respondent

30

20

10

Page 13: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

13

Where does technology belong relative to these knowledge initiative elements?

Knowledge Initiative

ObjectivesScope

Culture

Staffing

Communica-tions

TechnologyScheduling,

project management

Justification

Measure-ment

Implementa-tion

Ongoing Management

Page 14: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

14

Possible tensions across roles and when defining knowledge initiatives and technologies

Users – Drivers I/T – Responders

Demand that tools meet the true needs of knowledge initiatives

Rely on standard tools to ensure a stable environment

Are expert in their business and its needs

Are expert in technology and its application

Define business needs for technology

Address technology needs

Ensure that applications are implemented and used effectively

Plan for ongoing resource and security issues

Identify technology functions and usability features that must be incorporated

Integrate disparate software systems

Focus on how processes work Focus on how technology works

Require knowledge initiatives to leverage knowledge

Support IT initiatives to respond to knowledge leverage

Page 15: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

15

Questions:

Technology in your organization…

What role has technology played in your knowledge initiatives?

When has it been appropriate?

When has it been inappropriate?

Page 16: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

16

Types of knowledge-centric initiatives Collaboration

Collaborative Software Knowledge-sharing activities

Human Discovery Knowledge Analysis Knowledge Discovery Benchmarking

Repositories Databases Expertise applications

Accessibility Electronic Discovery

Page 17: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

17

Survey: Successful KM solutions

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Page 18: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

18

Survey Organizations: Treatment of knowledge initiatives

One-off, sanctioned project

30%

Part of structured program

38%

Other28%

Page 19: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

19

Survey Organizations: Ownership of knowledge initiatives

Top management

41%

Business unit benefitting

42%

IT17%

Page 20: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

20

Survey Organizations: Senior management’s role

Sponsorship and vocal support

44%

Qualified approval30%

Non-enthusiastic

approval14%

Disinterest12%

Vocal opposition0%

Page 21: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

21

Survey Organizations: Life of knowledge initiatives

1 year or less16%

2 years18%

3 years10%4 years

12%

5 or more years44%

Page 22: Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Boston KM.

22

Audience Questions

Lynda MoultonLWM Technology Services

[email protected]

Larry ChaitChait and Associates, Inc.

[email protected]