Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results;...
-
Upload
alyssa-ellington -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
3
Transcript of Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants Practical KM Survey Results;...
Practical KM Survey Results; Analysis and Commentary from Participants
Boston KM Forum, January 17, 2013
Panel: Lisa O’Donnell (Genzyme/Sanofi), Bert Saul (SGH), Glynys Thomas (The Parthenon Group), Marcie Zaharee (The MITRE Corporation) Moderators: Lynda Moulton and Larry Chait
Entire Contents Copyright © 2013 Chait and Associates, Inc.
2
Practical knowledge management…
3
Survey Respondents said about their Organization’s ability to leverage knowledge
Excellent7%
Good39%
Average41%
Fair7%
Poor6%
4
Perspective: Knowledge leverage initiatives
Centrality of human beings—Only knowledgeable people can determine appropriate fit of new technologies to knowledge initiatives
State of flux—Impacts of a changing environment on knowledge processing
Knowledge Leverage is the operational force applied to derive institutional benefit from available and authoritative information resources (expert people, knowledge codified in content, and organizational know-how)
5
Critical “gut check”Is the knowledge initiative about technology or
does something else need to be addressed first?
Long before technology connectors are acquired or planned for a knowledge opportunity, the leader of a knowledge initiative—and an organization as a whole—must do a serious gut check.
6
Questions for panel:
The changing environment…
In what ways have changes in the environment impacted how your organization processes knowledge?
For example: Changes in case law and litigation discovery requiring corporate email retention
7
Critical “gut check”In a “gut check,” ask these questions:
What is the changing business, legal or regulatory environment that calls for an initiative?
Given who you are and what you know, can you and your organization address your knowledge opportunity effectively?
Can the needed people and resources be marshaled?
Can you define and convincingly defend the initiative?
Are you—and the organization—willing to take the risk?
Critical “gut check”—critical elements People—the “who”—what knowledge and
competencies are needed, and who are the key stakeholders
Goal—the “what”—what is the value proposition; what will the initiative do and how will it provide value?
Scope—the “how big”—how much of the initiative is in whose domain, and what can realistically be accomplished?
8
9
Questions for panel:
“Gut checks” in your organization…
Has your organization done effective “gut checks” before launching knowledge initiatives?
If so, to what advantage?
If not, with what consequences?
10
Survey Respondents Think Major KM Challenges Are:
Finding knowledge when needed
22%
Sharing knowledge effectively
31%
Organizing and managing
knowledge as-sets25%
Accessing knowl-edge with tech-nology support
6%
Hoarding knowledge
2%
Other14%
11
Survey: Important attributes for KM leaders
Dee
p kn
owle
dge
of th
e bu
sine
ss
Exce
llent
com
mun
icat
ion
skill
s
Trus
ted
by o
ther
s
Resp
ecte
d by
top
man
agem
ent
Solv
es d
ifficu
lt pr
oble
ms
Dee
p co
nnec
tions
to e
xper
ts
Cont
ent m
anag
emen
t exp
ert,
rese
arch
er, i
nfor
mat
ion
scie
ntist
Expe
rienc
e br
ingi
ng c
haot
ic
prog
ram
s un
der c
ontrol
Subj
ect-m
atte
r exp
ertis
e
Expe
rtise
in IT
25
15
5
Out of 50 – Multiple Answers per respondent
12
Survey: Important attributes for KM team members
Dee
p kn
owle
dge
of th
e bu
sine
ss
Exce
llent
com
mun
icat
ion
skill
s
Trus
ted
by o
ther
s
Resp
ecte
d by
top
man
agem
ent
Solv
es d
ifficu
lt pr
oble
ms
Dee
p co
nnec
tions
to e
xper
ts
Cont
ent m
anag
emen
t exp
ert,
rese
arch
er, i
nfor
mat
ion
scie
ntist
Expe
rienc
e br
ingi
ng c
haot
ic
prog
ram
s un
der c
ontrol
Subj
ect-m
atte
r exp
ertis
e
Expe
rtise
in IT
Out of 50 – Multiple Answers per respondent
30
20
10
13
Where does technology belong relative to these knowledge initiative elements?
Knowledge Initiative
ObjectivesScope
Culture
Staffing
Communica-tions
TechnologyScheduling,
project management
Justification
Measure-ment
Implementa-tion
Ongoing Management
14
Possible tensions across roles and when defining knowledge initiatives and technologies
Users – Drivers I/T – Responders
Demand that tools meet the true needs of knowledge initiatives
Rely on standard tools to ensure a stable environment
Are expert in their business and its needs
Are expert in technology and its application
Define business needs for technology
Address technology needs
Ensure that applications are implemented and used effectively
Plan for ongoing resource and security issues
Identify technology functions and usability features that must be incorporated
Integrate disparate software systems
Focus on how processes work Focus on how technology works
Require knowledge initiatives to leverage knowledge
Support IT initiatives to respond to knowledge leverage
15
Questions:
Technology in your organization…
What role has technology played in your knowledge initiatives?
When has it been appropriate?
When has it been inappropriate?
16
Types of knowledge-centric initiatives Collaboration
Collaborative Software Knowledge-sharing activities
Human Discovery Knowledge Analysis Knowledge Discovery Benchmarking
Repositories Databases Expertise applications
Accessibility Electronic Discovery
17
Survey: Successful KM solutions
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
18
Survey Organizations: Treatment of knowledge initiatives
One-off, sanctioned project
30%
Part of structured program
38%
Other28%
19
Survey Organizations: Ownership of knowledge initiatives
Top management
41%
Business unit benefitting
42%
IT17%
20
Survey Organizations: Senior management’s role
Sponsorship and vocal support
44%
Qualified approval30%
Non-enthusiastic
approval14%
Disinterest12%
Vocal opposition0%
21
Survey Organizations: Life of knowledge initiatives
1 year or less16%
2 years18%
3 years10%4 years
12%
5 or more years44%
22
Audience Questions
Lynda MoultonLWM Technology Services
Larry ChaitChait and Associates, Inc.