Prac Court Crimcases

8/13/2019 Prac Court Crimcases

1/5

Branch

1. People vs Rosalinda Guilar Galila No defense counsel was present during thesecond call. Counsel was notified. If e will not be present during next hearing, he shallbe replaced. He was2. People vs Elvira Bernardo Case was set for continuation of trial. Formal venuefor possibility of negotiation was ascertained. Amount subject of the case is total ofPhp 1M (Php300K and Php700K). Case was set for conference only and not JDR forsettlement of Civil Aspect on Oct 4, Friday, 2:30PM.3. People vs P/Supt. Rafael Cardeno No Appearances4. People vs Rodrigo Ceynas Y Rocaberte No Appearances5. People vs PO1 George Verbo, et al. PO1 Verbo died; his wife shot him. Defensefiled Motion to Dismiss. Prosecution manifested that the deceased accused waspresent during initial trial; however, he alleged that there was mistake of identity.Case was dismissed provisionally with regard to those alive.6. People vs Erwin Regota Carlos Dy was the complainant. The parties underwentmediation, however, failed to settle. Hence, case was re-set for trial.7. People vs Marcelito Tobias Case was set for continuation of trial. However,witness was not able to come. Complainant is asking for the payment of medicalexpenses in the East Avenue Medical Center amounting to Php51,000. Defendantalleged that Php60,000 was already paid to the complainant. Complainant furtherallege that he was assisted by the bus company (Pascual Lines) for 1 month while heactually stayed in the hospital for 4 months. Case was set for compromise. Nextwitness will no longer be presented.8. People vs Carlo Trial in absencia shall proceed. Witness PO3 Ramon Adun waspresented. He alleged he was conducting his usual surveillance of the vicinity when hesaw the complainant with a fan knife. Case was re-set.9. People vs Renato Baluyot Witnesses are present. Accused was re-arraigned andpleaded not guilty.

10.

People vs Ariel and Javier Padua No complainant present. Case wasprovisionally dismissed.


2/5

Branch 217

11. People vs Rosalinda Guilar Galila No defense counsel was present during thesecond call. Counsel was notified. If e will not be present during next hearing, he shallbe replaced. He was12. People vs Elvira Bernardo Case was set for continuation of trial. Formal venuefor possibility of negotiation was ascertained. Amount subject of the case is total ofPhp 1M (Php300K and Php700K). Case was set for conference only and not JDR forsettlement of Civil Aspect on Oct 4, Friday, 2:30PM.13. People vs P/Supt. Rafael Cardeno No Appearances14. People vs Rodrigo Ceynas Y Rocaberte No Appearances15. People vs PO1 George Verbo, et al. PO1 Verbo died; his wife shot him. Defensefiled Motion to Dismiss. Prosecution manifested that the deceased accused waspresent during initial trial; however, he alleged that there was mistake of identity.Case was dismissed provisionally with regard to those alive.16. People vs. Danilo Angelo Samia-Coronado For frustrated murder. Real name ofthe accused is Dino Angelo. Trial in absencia shall proceed. The complainant, Dr.Zyrin R. Valencia took the witness stand. She is 44 years old and a physician in SM

The Block. One night the accused came in to her clinic and without any word startedstabbing her at the back.17. People vs Bernardo & Merida No Appearances18. People vs Mark David Chua Case was set for initial trial. One of the witnessestook the stand, Dr. De Luna. Direct examination offered exhibits. During crossexamination, defense counsel noted the wounds present in the body of the victim.During re-direct, objection was raised since the question was already answered. Caseis set for another hearing. Prosecution is directed to present original receipt ofmedicines utilized by the complainant. Amount paid is likewise contested.19. People vs. Robert Magsipoc Jr.20. People vs Dennis Baisac, et al. Counsel was not present. Accused were given

choice if they will offer their testimony on next hearing. Case was set for the formaloffer of the accused (3). No documentary evidence were identified upon testimony of allthe accused.


3/5

Branch 43 (MeTC)

1. People vs Cornelius Case was provisionally dismissed for a period of 1 year. Areturn of notice to the complainant with notation was taken into consideration whichalleges that complainant is no longer holding office in his address.2. People vs Beverly Balarez Parties did not arrive in the mediation, complainantclaims she was not properly informed. However, records show that both parties wereinformed in open court. Hence parties were re-scheduled for mediation.3. People vs Eusebio Alera - Case was likewise referred for mediation.4. People vs Lilibeth Rizaldo and Elizabeth Solon Solon was sick, court instructedfor her to submit medical certificate. Case was re-set for preliminary conference.5. People vs Darel Mangubat, Elmer Amigo, et al. Complainant Tirso Cruz was notpreset. Case was re-set for preliminary conference.6. People vs Jomar Caa Complainant Globe Telecoms was duly represented.Authorization of the representative to participate in the settlement of the case in behalfof the corporation and was found to be capable to do so. Case was referred tomediation and was re-set for pre-trial.7. People vs Erwin Regota Carlos Dy was the complainant. The parties underwentmediation, however, failed to settle. Hence, case was re-set for trial.8. People vs Marcelito Tobias Case was set for continuation of trial. However,witness was not able to come. Complainant is asking for the payment of medicalexpenses in the East Avenue Medical Center amounting to Php51,000. Defendantalleged that Php60,000 was already paid to the complainant. Complainant furtherallege that he was assisted by the bus company (Pascual Lines) for 1 month while heactually stayed in the hospital for 4 months. Case was set for compromise. Nextwitness will no longer be presented.9. People vs Carlo Trial in absencia shall proceed. Witness PO3 Ramon Adun waspresented. He alleged he was conducting his usual surveillance of the vicinity when hesaw the complainant with a fan knife. Case was re-set.

10.

People vs Renato Baluyot Witnesses are present. Accused was re-arraigned andpleaded not guilty.11. People vs Ariel and Javier Padua No complainant present. Case wasprovisionally dismissed.12. People vs. Jodel Conde Complainant is SM Supermart for the chocolates stolen(KitKat). Accused was permitted to bail.13. People vs. Maximo Coban Case was set for mediation; however, no settlementwas reached. There are still 4 other related cases handled by same counsel, Atty.Piajano. Accused was duly identified. Complainant claims that he was stabbed 10times; however, other stabs only resulted in scars and not wounds.14. People vs Robert Delos Reyes Amount subject of the case is Php40,000.15. People vs Rodolfo Dalanay Case was re-set.

16. People vs Jose Alontabe Both parties not present. Warrant for arrest will beissued; warrant was archived.17. People vs Belleza Mountain bike was returned. Case was provisionallydismissed.18. People vs Angelina Solliven Case was settled in the court. Defendants willprovide monthly allowance to the college-level child of the complainant. However, othermonetary claims shall no longer be awarded.


4/5

Branch 42 (MeTC)

1. People vs Reyes Case was provisionally dismissed. No accused was presentdespite warrant issued.2. People vs Rommel Jica Only the complainant was present.3. People vs Edward Villanueva Complainant was present.4. People vs Mica Nazario Same appearances of counsels. Case was set for pre-trialand arraignment.5. People vs Gruza, Villanueva Both accused were present. Case was set for pre-trial with warning of dismissal. No communication with lawyers since November 2012.Court noted the name of witness, Daryl Hilario. Counsel of the defendant was held incontempt for a fine of Php1,000.6. People vs Pascua Authority of the private counsel to prosecute shall besubmitted to the court within 10days. Counsel was not allowed for his motion that theGIS be stricken off the record alleging its contestability and invalidity.7. People vs Rizal Advincula Two cases were consolidated. Both parties werepresent. Complainant filed manifestation for extension to study the case. Case was setfor compromise agreement.8. Peopla vs Jose Kristina Prosecution submitted motion for reconsideration.Defense noted that an order was issued based on the civil aspect.9. People vs Pascual Same appearances of counsels. Both parties were present.Marking of evidence was done. Judicial affidavit rule must be followed.10. People vs Edna Golum no appearances11. People vs Romulo Beria No rebuttals were submitted. No more witnesses to bepresented. Case was submitted for decision.12. People vs Rosalie Sargo Case was also pending in the Ombudsman. Oppositionto the motion to dismiss must be submitted within 10days. Defense agreed with themanifestation.13. People vs Viste No appearances.


5/5

Branch 33

1. People vs Pascual Same appearances of counsels. Both parties were present.Marking of evidence was done. Judicial affidavit rule must be followed.2. People vs Edna Golum no appearances3. People vs Romulo Beria No rebuttals were submitted. No more witnesses to bepresented. Case was submitted for decision.4. People vs Rosalie Sargo Case was also pending in the Ombudsman. Opposition tothe motion to dismiss must be submitted within 10days. Defense agreed with themanifestation.5. People vs Viste No appearances.6. People vs Reyes Case was provisionally dismissed. No accused was presentdespite warrant issued.7. People vs Rommel Jica Only the complainant was present.8. People vs Edward Villanueva Complainant was present.9. People vs Mica Nazario Same appearances of counsels. Case was set for pre-trialand arraignment.10. People vs Gruza, Villanueva Both accused were present. Case was set for pre-trial with warning of dismissal. No communication with lawyers since November 2012.Court noted the name of witness, Daryl Hilario. Counsel of the defendant was held incontempt for a fine of Php1,000.

Prac Court Crimcases

Documents

Transcript of Prac Court Crimcases