18.11.

Community

Stall

25.10.

1st Meeting

StART

20.11.

Health

Group

21.11.

Strategy

Group

23.11.

Environment

Group

+

Housing

Group

27.11.

Inclusion

Group

30.11.

Selby

Trust

14.12.

Presentation

today

02.12.

New Members

Group

HEALTH&WELL-BEING

DIVERSITY&CULTURE

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

The London Plan &Wolves Lane community

PU3: Practice Development Planning ModuleMSc Urban Development Planning

December 2017

Authors:Masato AkashiGordon JenningsKaixin LinDaniela MuñozQiuhua QiYuqi ShiShaba TaskinFernando ToroVivian Yeboah

LONDON

GROWN

GO GROWN

WOLVES LANE

HORICULTURAL

CENTER

WOLVES LANE COMMUNITY

FRIENDS OF

WOLVES LANE

2. Forming an SIA through the lens of Wolves Lane

Objective> how we applied SIA methodology process in timeWhat we went through, the process so far, what we did so far.How did we produce the SIARelational to the draft plan

THE LONDON PLANNING SYSTEM BE RESPONSIVE TO FOOD SOVEREIGNTY CLAIM ?

Defining Food Sovereignty

Deirdre⭐Dee⭐Woods

LLONDON GROWN

GO GROW

Accessible Food + Community + Inclusion + Education + Space + Participation + Culture

FOOD SOVEREIGNTY

Groups who usually have access to community spaces are not diverse. They don’t represent London.

Yvonne

The community

needs to be in the heart of

any development plan

Moussa

We want Wolves Lane to be a community Centre, for all.

Mandy

We want to make a change, for a more a more

caring communitySalford

Healthy food is not affordable for ordinary working class.

Angela

01

02

03

04

05

06

01 02 03 04

Social Impact

Assessment: Gypsies and

Travellers in Southwark

14th December 2017Bing Bing, Federico, Grace, Hannah, José, Jun, Karlene, Nada, Yiorgos.

/ Research and Interviews

Step 1: Literature Review• UK, London, and Southwark plans and policies

(general, and specific to Gypsies & Travellers)

• Reports, articles, and websites of Gypsy and

Traveller special interest groups, community

organisations, and other universities

Step 2: Meeting with Partners• Initial visit to Spring Tide Close

• Introduction and first planning

meeting with STAG

representatives

Step 3: Focus Groups, Site Visits and Semi-Structured Interviews• 1 interview with a female Traveller at the STAG office

• 1 focus group with 4 female Travellers in the Spring Tide

Close site

• 1 interview with a female housed Irish Traveller

• 6 interviews with Travellers in the Ilderton Road site (3 males

3 females)

• 1 interview with 2 STAG Trustees

Communal Spaces, Facilities, Services and Activities — Well Run, Accessible, Affordable and Relevant to

All

Lifetime neighbourhoods are the place where quality of

life and space intersect; where socio-spatial environmental

justice can be achieved.

An ideal site for gypsies and travellers in a lifetime

neighbourhood is one that has:

Homes That Meet Needs

Good Consultation, Democratic Accountability and Empowerment of Communities

3

1

2

Source: Just Space, 2016. Towards a Community Led Plan for London.

https://justspacelondon.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/just-space-a4-

community-led-london-plan.pdf

/ Lifetime Neighbourhoods

Recognition

“Family and caring for members of our family

are some of the most important things for us.”

“Children’s education was the main reason for

us to settle down.”

“Traveller life is still threatened. We still suffer

from discrimination such as in schools, church

and when booking weddings.”

“We need good quality communal spaces within

the site.”

/ Socio-Spatial Environmental Justice

Distribution

“We would like to live in

sustainable living spaces.”

“If you put all four sites in

Peckham together, it wouldn’t

make one proper site.”

“It would be nice to have fair

play between different people

who want somewhere to live.”

/ Socio-Spatial Environmental Justice

Recognition

Recognition

Participation

“No-one really listens to us

or tries to understand our

way of life.”

“Nobody consulted us about

what the temporary site

would look like.”

“There was someone from the

council who helped us but

they ‘let him go’.”

Distribution

/ Socio-Spatial Environmental Justice

Recognition

DistributionParticipation

Capacity to participate in

local decision-making

processes. (3)

Control over use of space on

site. (1)

Appropriate use of space/layout in the

site. (2)

Participation in identity-building cultural

activities. (1)

Sufficient number of

appropriately-sized

pitches. (2)

Access to non-

discriminatory health and

educational facilities. (1)

LifetimeNeighbourhoods

Definition: A commitment to redressing material inequalities through redistribution,

valuing diverse spatial practices and needs through recognition, and countering

exclusion and marginalisation through parity of participation.

Source: Fraser, N., 1996, “Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition,

and Participation”, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Stanford University

/ Socio-Spatial Environmental Justice

Category 1 – Communal Spaces, Activities.

Category 2 – Homes that Meet Needs

Category 3 – Democratic Accountability

Thank you!

Jibril Maxamad, Viola Li,

Balint Horvath, Marwa

Barakat, Mateo Lu, Shiori

Sato, Tiara Sadikin,

Clementine Hugo-

Hamman, Tianyuan Weng

Local Business & Social Enterprise

Housing

Community Spaces

Pe

mP

eo

ple

SG Tenant Organisation Church

h

Feminist Library

❖

❖

❖

❖

❖

❖

❖

❖

❖

❖

❖

❖

❖

❖

❖

YES, BUT…

RE-DESIGN OF

INTERVENTION BY

COMMUNTIY

INSTITUTIONAL

FRAMEWORK

COMMUNITY

OTHER

STAKEHOLDERS

PARTICIPATORY

INDICATORS (NEEDS

AND PRIORITIES)

DIAGNOSIS (MEASURE

CURRENT LEVEL OF

JUSTICE)

ASSESSING

POTENTIAL IMPACT

DIAGNOSIS (MEASURE

CHANGE IN LEVEL OF

JUSTICE)

SCORECARD

SOCIAL

INFRASTRUCTURE AND

COMMUNITY ASSETS

IDENTIFY CONTEXT

DETERMINE BASELINE

CONDUCT ASSESSMENT OF

PROPOSED INTERVENTION

DECISION ON INTERVENTION

NO YES

MITIGATION PLAN (if any)

MONITORING

Existing Housing Provision

New Housing Provision

Irreplaceability

Green Spaces

Capacity to Remain

Quantity and Quality of Workspace Employment Support

ApprenticeshipsDisplacement

Rent Affordability

Cultural Identity

Maintenance

01 02 03 04

Activities link

to FS

Impacts

Related To

DRP

IndicatorsAffected

People

05

Determination

Of Collection

Scope

•

•

•

•

Proximity to one’s family

● Family members within shouting distance (Count)

● Average distance between family members

(Average)

Scoring for:

● Current situation (baseline)

● Future situation (impact)

Impact Score: The difference between the

current score and the projected score of the

intervention.

Which dimensions?

Which scores?Which data?

Which indicators?

3

2

4

1

Homes that meet needs

A decision-making tool...

...informed by the community

Generating:

● a combined impact score

● the number of areas of significant

negative impact

Prior to assessment and depending on the needs of

the community concerned:

● a different weighting of the indicators can

be applied

● the most crucial areas of impact can be

identified

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•