PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

45
1 TV 2010 Communications Studies 197C Sept. 6, 2004

Transcript of PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

Page 1: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

1

TV 2010Communications Studies

197C

Sept. 6, 2004

Page 2: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

2

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Consumer Good to Divisible, Editable Asset

1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s

Ninte

ndo

hom

e vide

o ga

me

-- 19

81

Inte

rnet

Bub

ble

Block

bust

er e

xpan

sion

star

ts 1

987

Broad

band

AOL Fo

unde

d - 1

985

Pay

per v

iew s

tarts

- 19

85

????

??

Meg

aplexe

s - 1

995

Mergers

PVR’s

Wire

less

med

ia?

Consumer ProductsChannel Explosions

Digital

Page 3: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

3

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

How Did We Get Here?

Changing economics of television networksRegulation and Technologies…

Cable

Satellite

PVRs

Page 4: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

4

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

How Do I Receive Thee?

• Over the Air?

• Cable?

• C-Band?

• Ku-Band – DirecTV, Dish (Echostar)?

• Cable Modem or DSL?

Page 5: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

5

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

New Distribution Windows

• 1889: Kinetoscope• 1895: Cinematographe (exhibition)• 1939: NBC Television (network television)• 1975: HBO (pay television)• 1976: TBS Superstation (basic cable)• 1976: Betamax (home video)• 1985: Viewer’s Choice (pay-per-view)• 2001: CinemaNow; MovieLink (internet

downloading)

Page 6: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

6

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Video Media: Time Shift from Broadcast TV to Cable &

Satellite

Source: Veronis Suhler Stevenson, MPAA

Hours Spent Per Year By Media

667

884

936

283

851

8101001

228 185

125

120

43

5413 36

175

107 84

117

13 15777

Cable & Satellite TV

Broadcast TV

Consumer Internet

Home Video,prerecorded

Box Office

Video on Demand

Radio

Recorded Music

Daily Newspapers

Consumer Magazines

1988

2002p

Page 7: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

7

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

History of Cable – 1948 Birth to 1960’s Halt by FCC

• 1948 --Arkansas, Oregon and Pennsylvania -- enhance reception of over-the-air TV mountainous or remote areas

• “Community antennas” (CATV) on mountain tops or high points; homes connected to antenna towers to receive signals

• 1952 – 70 “cable” systems served 14,000 subs, mostly 100 mile radii

• 1953 – Microwave relays began• Late 1950’s – Carriage begins of “distant signals”• 1962 – Almost 800 cable systems served 850,000 subscribers

o Westinghouse, TelePrompTer and Cox investedo Entrepreneurs: Bill Daniels, Martin Malarkey, Jack Kent

Cookeo 1963 -- Carter Mountain Transmission Corp. v. FCC • 1966/68 -- FCC restricted carriage of distant signals in top

100 markets

Page 8: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

8

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

1970-80’s – FCC and Satellite Effects

• 1972 -- Cable Television Report and Order -- FCC gradual deregulation; protected local stations' exclusive rights to syndicated programming

• 1972 -- Charles Dolan & Gerald Levin of Sterling Manhattan Cable launched Home Box Office (HBO).

• National satellite distribution system used a newly approved domestic satellite transmission

• TV station, owned by R.E. "Ted" Turner, was distributed by satellite to cable systems nationwide, and soon became known as the first "superstation," WTBS

Page 9: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

9

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Compulsory License – Key in the Lock

• 1976 – Law granted cable operators compulsory license to make distant broadcast signals available to its subscribers and to establish royalty rates to be paid by cable operators

• At that time, many copyright owners and broadcasters were unwilling to make their programming available to cable subscribers. 

• Congress created a statutory licensing mechanism that provided an efficient way to license copyrighted material and ensured that copyright owners received payment for use of their programming

Page 10: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

10

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

1980s/90s – The Cable Act(s)

• 1980 – nearly 16 million households subscribed• 1984 – 1984 Cable Act – relaxed framework,

attracted investment; 1984-1992, $15 billion was spent on wiring systems

• 1989 – nearly 53 million households subscribed; cable networks increased from 28 in 1980 to 79 by 1989

• 1992 – 1992 Cable Act – enabled competition from wireless cable and DBS, responding to price increases

• 1995 – 139 national cable networks available

Page 11: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

11

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

1990s -- New Money & Businesses

• 1996 – Telecommunications Act of 1996 – increased competition

o AT&T entering the business in 1998, though exiting four years later by merging with Comcast in 2001

o Paul Allen, a founder of Microsoft, began acquiring his own stable of cable properties.

o America On-Line merged with Time Warner and its cable properties

• 1998 – 171 national cable networks available• 1996-2002 -- $65 billion spent on upgrading systems with

fiber optic and coaxial cable – “broadband” networks

Page 12: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

12

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Cable Now

• 73.7 million basic subscribers as of 1Q04• Digital cable could be found in 22.9 million

homes (31%)• Subscribership to high-speed Internet access

service via cable modems had grown to 17.3 million by 1Q04 (up 35% vs 1Q03)

• 2.7 million customers were using cable for their phone connections 1Q04 (up slightly)

• By 2002, about 280 nationally-delivered cable networks were available, with that number growing steadily

Page 13: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

13

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

US HH Penetration of Video Media

0

20

40

60

80

100

12019

50

1955

1960

1965

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2002

US

HH

(m

illio

ns)

HH

TV HH

Cable HH

Pay Cable HH

VCR HH

Addressable HH

Digital Cable

Satellite

VOD HH

Sources: Nielsen Media Research-NTI; TVB; Census Bureau; MPAA; Kagan; NCTA, Adams Research

Page 14: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

14

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Cable Numbers You Should Know

• U.S. HH -- 110.4 million (Jan. 2004)• U.S. TV HH – 108.4 million (Jan. 2004) (98% of HH)

• 1 rating point = 1% of TV HH• Basic cable HH – 73.9 million (Jan. 2004)(68% of TVHH)• VCR/DVD Homes – 98.4 million (91% of TVHH)• Digital cable HH – 20.6 million (est. as of June 2003)• Satellite (DSS) – 20.35 million (est. as of March 2003)

• Includes 11.4 million DirecTV subs and 8.4 million Dish Network subs

• DVR penetration = 2% of TVHH (as of Aug. 2003, Yankee Group)

Page 15: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

15

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Cable Systems: Different Economics than TV Stations

• Monthly Fees by Tier• Basic Tier(s)• Pay Services

• Multiplexing• Pay per View, VOD, Other Services

• Advertising• By Network• “Interconnect” by Local Systems

• Fractured Ownership by Market• Installation• Late Fees

Page 16: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

16

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Avg. Basic Cable Network: 50/50 Split

Gross Ad Revenue 53%Net Ad Revenue 45%License Fees 52%Other Revenue 3% Total 100%SG&A 21%Programming 46%"Cash Flow" 33%

Source: Kagan Research; 2003

Page 17: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

17

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

A Large Ad Pie to be Fighting Over

2003 U.S. Advertising, $ million

Source: Universal McCann/TVB

15,030

9,948

13,520

3,434

13,954

4,860  Network TV

  Spot (nat'l)

  Spot (local)

  Syndication

  Cable Network

  Cable (non-net)

Page 18: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

18

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Cable Advertising – Growth

TV/Cable Ad Revenue

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,00012,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

20,000

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

$ m

illio

n

  Network

  Spot (nat'l)

  Spot (local)

  Syndication

Cable Total

  Cable Network

  Cable (non-net)

Source: TVB

Page 19: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

19

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Cable Advertising – Long-Term Growth

Source: TVB/Universal McCann

TV/Cable Ad Revenue

02,0004,0006,0008,000

10,00012,00014,00016,00018,00020,000

$ m

illio

n

  Network

  Spot (nat'l)

  Spot (local)

  Syndication

Cable Total

  Cable Network

  Cable (non-net)

Page 20: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

20

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Dominant Cable Operators (MSOs)

Rank MSO Subscribers

1   Comcast Cable Communications (info)

21,468,000

2   Time Warner Cable 10,919,000

3   Charter Communications 6,431,300

4   Cox Communications 6,338,300

5   Adelphia Communications 5,469,800

6   Cablevision Systems Corporation

2,944,000

7   Bright House Networks 2,167,000

8   Mediacom Communications Corporations

1,543,000

9   Insight Communications 1,293,600

10   CableOne 720,800

    59,294,800Source: Kagan Research, LLC

Top 10: 49% of HUT; 81% of Cable

HH

Page 21: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

21

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Concentration of U.S. Distribution Pipes

MSO’s (Multiple System Operator) In millions

Comcast (ATT)

Time Warner

Charter Cox Adelphia Cablevision

Echostar Dish

DirecTV

21.4 11 6.5 6.3 5.2 3

“Voom”

8.8 11.5

= 54 million

= 80 % of the cable subscriber universe

Page 22: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

22

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Top Cable Networks by RatingsCable Network Primetime

RatingTVHH

TNT 1.7 1,984,000

USA 1.7 1,828,000

Nick/NAN 1.6 1,742,000

Disney 1.3 1,391,000

TBS 1.2 1,319,000

Lifetime 1.2 1,247,000

Toon Disney 1.1 1,243,000

ESPN 0.9 1,018,000

Fox News 0.9 1,010,000

Discovery 0.9 986,000

   Source: Kagan Research, LLC

Page 23: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

23

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Top Cable Networks by Revenue

Cable Network 2002 Revenue 2003 Revenue

ESPN $2,449.1 MM $2,871.6 MM

TNT $1,320.8 MM $1,502.1 MM

Nickelodeon $1,088.0 MM $1,244.1 MM

Fox Sports $1,022.4 MM $1,189.5 MM

MTV $860.2 MM $998.5 MM

USA $883.2 MM $933.1 MM

CNN $798.3 MM $858.2 MM

Lifetime $744.8 MM $790.0 MM

TBS $763.1 MM $776.2 MM

Disney Channel $735.6 MM $762.7 MM

   

Source: Kagan Research, LLC

Page 24: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

24

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Important Facts: Cable Financial Model

• Cable financial model depends on popularity of net

• New nets typically have to pay per sub fee to get carriage

• Popular nets (ESPN) get per sub fee from MSO•ESPN rates at around $2/subscriber (or

more)•Comcast’s total programming costs per sub

per month (as of 1/13/2003) were $14.87

Page 25: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

25

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Satellite – Late to the Party

• 1988 – Congress enacted the Satellite Home Viewer Act (“SHVA”) to ensure that subscribers to satellite services would have access to broadcast signals.  

• At that time, satellite TV service consisted of the large C-Band dishes that were primarily in rural areas. 

• C-Band peaked at 2.4 million subscribers in 1995, but has dropped to below 500,000

• In 1994, the Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) service became available to consumers – has grown to over 21 million subscribers

Page 26: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

26

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Reaching the US TV Consumer

Cume Penetration of US Households by Channel

-10.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.0

Channel

% A

vg W

eekl

y C

um

e

Source: Nielsen 2002; weekly cume

Page 27: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

27

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Fragmented Competition: Number of US Cable & Satellite

Channels

6072 78

91

113130

155168

202

227235

250267

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Nu

mb

er o

f C

han

nel

s

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Year

Source: Screen Digest

1994: Launch of

Digital Satellite

1997: Launch of

Digital Cable

Page 28: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

28

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Cable TV & Satellite -- US

• Direct Broadcast Satellite – 15.8% US households (up from 13.8% 7/02)

• Wired Cable - 70.3% of US Households, down from 67.9% 7/02 (back to 4/96 levels)

• 58 TV markets now have Alternate Delivery system penetration of 25% or more

• Springfield, MO 46%• Dallas/Ft. Worth 38%

Page 29: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

29

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

US Channels Available Doesn’t Materially Impact 14-19 Channels

Watched

195

115.5

104.895

8475.5

66.156.3

45.636.2

15.624.4

17.919.116.115.916.615.615.6151412.37.15.80

50

100

150

200

250

11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100 101-110 111-120 121+

Channels Available

Nu

mb

er o

f Ch

ann

els

Avg Receivable Avg Viewed

Source: Nielsen, National People Meter Sample 8/01; TVB

Page 30: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

30

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

How Do Cable Channels Compete?

• Marketing• Niche Programming – repackaged, syndicated, used

across platforms• HGTV, Discovery, History, MTV, ESPN

• Repurposing (co-owned networks; quick reruns)• Original Programming

• FX: The Shield, Nip/Tuck• Bravo: Queer Eye for the Straight Guy• ESPN/Fox: Sports programming

• More Expensive!• Off-Network Programs

Page 31: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

31

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Network Concentrated Landscape

Turner ABC/ESPN MTV Networks

Discovery Fox NBC Scripps

10 10 19 13 8 6 4

• CNN Fin

• CNN Int

• Cartoon

• TBS

• TNN

• TNT

• CNN

• TCM

• Disney

• ESPN

• Toon Disney

• SoapNet

• VH1

• Comedy

• MTV

• Nick

• TV Land

• Spike

• Noggin

• Animal Planet

•En Español

•Learning

• Discovery

• excluding regional)

• Fox Movie

• FX

• Fox News

• Fox Sports

• Nat Geo

• CNBC

• CNBC world

• MSNBC

•Bravo

• Food

• HGTV

• DIY

• Fine Living

Page 32: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

32

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

2 3 2 3 3

• A & E• Histor

y

A & E AMC E! Lifetime USA

• WE

• AMC

• Lifetime

• LMN

• USA

• SCI Fi

• HSN

Independent Channels

Golf Channel

Hallmark

Weather

QVC

Oxygen

IFC

• Style

• E!

Page 33: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

33

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Recent Off-network Programs to Cable

Year Avail.

Program

Syndicator

Cable Network

Orig. Network

Eps. Fee/episode

2006 Frasier Paramount

Lifetime NBC 264 $600K

2004 Smallville

Warner ABC Family

WB 66 $400K

2004 Fear Factor

NBC FX NBC 100 $280K

2005 Alias Buena Vista

TNT ABC 66 $200K

2004 Jamie Kennedy

Warner ABC Family

WB 61 $150K

2004 Yes, Dear

Fox TBS CBS 96 $75K

Source: Kagan Research, LLC

Page 34: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

34

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

U.S. Changing – How about other Countries?

• Different cable/satellite mix• National programming – culture• Reality Show – Global Impact• Ownership concentration• Interactive TV – U.K. (Sky TV), Israel (cable)

• Competitive advantages

Page 35: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

35

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Digital Customization for Local Appetites –

MTV brand extensions

Page 36: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

36

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Current Challenges?

• Vertical & Horizontal Integration• New Services• Reality (previous kings included game show)• Advertiser support – Integration – Product

Placement• Reruns & Cable Repurposing

Page 37: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

37

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Vertical & Horizontal Integration

• Comcast - AT&T (failed bid for Disney)• News Corp. buys DirecTV• Adelphia up for sale• Intensifies competition: more at stake,

more pieces to maneuver

Page 38: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

38

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Competition Driving New Services

• Cable launching VOD (difficult for satellite, inefficient upstream path)

• Satellite counters with DVR, calls it VOD (cable launching DVR too)

• Cable offers broadband and voice (satellite teams with DSL, RBOCs)

• HDTV - advantage for satellite in short-run, capacity issues later; regulatory local “must-carry” considerations

• ITV and custom IPGs next (Murdoch’s success with BSkyB)

Retail prices kept at bay for now

Page 39: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

39

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

People Meter Controversy

• Nielsen is trying to record what people watch every 15 minutes to determine rating with 2,000 households

• Challenges now that sample is unrepresentative of total population (higher end house skew).

• Boxes just tell if the TV set is on, not whether a person is there actually watching it or not.

• Issues that have arisen with technology is that there are multi-set households, VCR and Tivo which alter when people watch, etc.

Page 40: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

40

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Reality Show – Winner of 2003/04 Season

• 9 of the top 20 top-rated shows among adults 18-49 were reality shows.

• A reality show was the top-rated show in the key demo for ABC ("The Bachelor“), NBC ("The Apprentice," tied with "Friends"), Fox ("American Idol") and UPN ("America's Next Top Model").

Source: Variety 5/27/04

Page 41: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

41

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Reality Show Economics

How American Idol makes $• Ad spots (network, national spot, local spot, cable

insertions)• Sponsors• Concerts• Albums• Cell phone• Syndication of idea to other countries• Low Cost & No Reruns or Traditional Syndication

(except Reality Show Network)

Page 42: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

42

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

DVDs -- TV Episodics Releases

Source: Video Store Magazine Market Research 2003

TV Episodics are the latest goldmine for Studios who will be expanding the category for the next few years as they mine their deep TV catalogs.

Top 10 Television DVD Sellers

Rank Title Supplier Index1 Family Guy Vol. 1 Seasons 1 & 2 Fox 1002 Osbournes: Season 1 (Uncensored) BVHE 85.43 Simpsons Season 3 Fox 72.04 Sex and the City: Season 4 HBO 63.15 Friends: Season 3 Warner 51.46 Family Guy Vol. 2: Season 3 Fox 49.37 Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Season 3 Fox 47.88 Band of Brothers HBO 43.19 South Park: Season 1 Warner 37.2

10 Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Season 4 Fox 35.7

Page 43: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

43

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Digital Television & High Def (HDTV)

• Rule change in 1997 allowed broadcasters to hold onto their analog channel until 85 percent of Americans have made the DTV transition.

• End of transition• December 31, 2006 or when 85 percent of

U.S. TV households have the capability to receive Digital TV signals (whichever is later)

• Digital Must Carry??

Page 44: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

44

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Distribution: Changing the Basic Economics of Television?

Broadband: 24% of households

Cable 15.9 mm, DSL 10.4 MM 1Q94

Cable 60+% of all broadband customers in U.S

Voice over IP (VoIP)

Video On Demand (VOD)

Satellite Surge

Cable TV Subs declined 63,000 1Q04

DirecTV -- Murdoch took over Dec. 03

Europe -- Sky TV

Asia -- STAR TV

Echostar (Dish+)

Tivo / PVRs

Page 45: PowerPoint Presentation: Sept. 8, 2004 -- TV 2010

45

Communications Studies 197C Summer 2004

Media 2010

• How fragmented?• How much piracy?• How much band to the home? Who controls it?• How much will the consumer be willing to

spend each month?• How do advertisers get their impressions to the

home?• How much band OUTSIDE the home? • How portable does media become? • How personalized?