Powered Pedestrian Doors and the NFRCc.ymcdn.com/.../2013_meetings/pedestrian_doors_stanley.pdfAbout...
Transcript of Powered Pedestrian Doors and the NFRCc.ymcdn.com/.../2013_meetings/pedestrian_doors_stanley.pdfAbout...
Powered Pedestrian Doors and the NFRCNew business opportunity24-Sep-13
Presenter: Michael Zabbo ([email protected])Role: Codes and Product Compliance Manager, SAT
Agenda
About our businessGoals and objectivesOverview of current productsAn example of the challengeSummaryQ&A
Goals and Objectives
• Overview of our company
• Provide an example of the challenges and confusion with compliance that the automatic door industry faces day to day
• Integrate the automatic door industry’s unique product types into NFRC 100; essentially introduce commercial products in the NFRC portfolio
• Develop a means to provide a “fair, accurate and credible rating” for our products
• Offer support and expertise to assist with new and existing code development and provide a different perspective on the fenestration market
The Challenge
• Recent customer requests to comply with the IECC and other energy codes and regulations. To do so, 3rd party proof is required to validate the following:- U-factor and SHGC maximum
- Air leakage maximum(topic for another day!)
#1
#2
Interesting this assemblymade it to the table!
Table data directly from IECC 2012
The challenge: U-factor
• As specified in NFRC 100, the test sample size should be built with a specific size and construction; 2-panel unit, size TBD
• What’s the issue?
OR
Table data directly from NFRC 100
The challenge: U-factor (ctd.)
• Sample size: The sample size can be built, but is not practical. The provide meaningful information, it should represent a typical automatic sliding door. The door should be constructed to meet the minimum building codes.
• Configuration: The test sample being locked to a 2-panel unit covers only a portion of the industry’s products, not all. Telescopic models cannot be built in a two panel configuration.
• Missing product types: Automatic sliding are not found on the list. More generically, this list doesn’t cover commercial products.
Summary
• Customers are very concerned about energy efficiency. Jurisdictions are now mandating specific levels of leakage and thermal resistance, and it’s important to quantify this fairly, accurately and credibly
• Customers are demanding 3rd party certification for U-factor. Currently, an appropriate method to do so is undefined.- Residential focus excludes many fenestration products; large opportunity here
• NFRC 100 revision would likely be required to incorporate these changes. Perhaps a new NFRC document could be developed to cover commercial and/or automatic entrances
• I’m here to help! More than willing to assist with the development of new language and expand the coverage of the NFRC into the commercial market!
• Thank you all for your time and consideration! Any questions?