Powered by SMART © Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006 The SMART Project Manager SMART...
-
Upload
hector-richardson -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
2
Transcript of Powered by SMART © Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006 The SMART Project Manager SMART...
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
The SMART Project Manager
The SMART Project Manager
SMART Project Management®
Skills for Software
Francis Hartman PhD FEIC FCAE FICE PEng CEng
Professor, University of Calgary
QeD Inc.
SMART Project Management®
Skills for Software
Francis Hartman PhD FEIC FCAE FICE PEng CEng
Professor, University of Calgary
QeD Inc.
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
AgendaAgenda
• Top 10 lessons not learned…
• A few important Questions
• Joining a few dots
• SMART Applied (selected)
• Where are we going next?
• Beware of imitations…
• Top 10 lessons not learned…
• A few important Questions
• Joining a few dots
• SMART Applied (selected)
• Where are we going next?
• Beware of imitations…
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
ExerciseExercise
Who is to blame for Software project Failure?
Who is to blame for Software project Failure?
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
ExerciseExercise
List the top ten causes of failure on your project(s).
List the top ten causes of failure on your project(s).
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Lessons we won’t learn - 1Lessons we won’t learn - 1
1. Inadequate Budget or Schedule, Optimistic Performance
2. Scarce or wrong Expertise3. Insufficient design development
prior to commitment4. Risks not identified and managed,
or understated5. Resource Shortages
1. Inadequate Budget or Schedule, Optimistic Performance
2. Scarce or wrong Expertise3. Insufficient design development
prior to commitment4. Risks not identified and managed,
or understated5. Resource Shortages
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Lessons we won’t learn - 2Lessons we won’t learn - 2
6. Communication breakdown
7. Scope changes out of control
8. Priorities shift over time
9. Wrong contracting strategy
10.Problems acknowledged too late
6. Communication breakdown
7. Scope changes out of control
8. Priorities shift over time
9. Wrong contracting strategy
10.Problems acknowledged too late
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
A few important QuestionsA few important Questions
• Project Approved? (SM)
• Priorities Clear? (A)
• Know what to do? (R)
• Next Crisis? (T)
29 out of 29 so far . . .
• Project Approved? (SM)
• Priorities Clear? (A)
• Know what to do? (R)
• Next Crisis? (T)
29 out of 29 so far . . .
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Approved?Approved?
50 40 55 80 100
Budget
E.A.C.
Team A Team B
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
AlignedAligned
T P
C
Align the Architect…
… and then the others…
PMPM
Sys.Arch.Sys.Arch.
Dev’tteamDev’tteam
SubsSubs SponsorSponsor
UsersUsers
SponsorBOSS
SponsorBOSS
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Know what’s Next?: 1Know what’s Next?: 1
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Know what’s Next?: 2Know what’s Next?: 2
Team A
Team B
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Crisis?: 1Crisis?: 1
PLOPLO PLOPLO PLOPLO PLOPLO PLOPLO PLOPLO PLOPLO PLOPLO PLOPLO
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRiskRiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
OppOpp
OppOpp OppOpp
OppOpp
OppOpp
OppOpp
OppOpp
OppOpp OppOpp
RiskRisk RiskRisk RiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
5/7/12weeks5/7/12weeks
BadWeather
BadWeather
Pre-ApprovePermit
Pre-ApprovePermit
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Crisis?: 2HI
LO
PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE
IMPACT
LO HI
1122
3344
Consider Priorities:
T, P, C
Consider Break-pointProbability
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRiskRiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk
RiskRisk RiskRisk
OppOppOppOpp
OppOpp
OppOpp
OppOpp
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Join the Dots…Join the Dots…
SuccessMeasures
?
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Priority TrianglePriority Triangle
Time Performance
Cost
XX
XX
XX XXXX
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Time Performance
Cost
XX
Priority TrianglePriority Triangle
XXXX
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Importance?Importance? T P
C
$1,000MustShouldNice
$1,350$ 950$1,050
?
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Join the Dots…Join the Dots…
SuccessMeasures
PM Maturity
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
PM MaturityPM Maturity
It is all relative….
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Join the Dots…Join the Dots…
SuccessMeasures
PM Maturity
Challenge
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Assessing the ProjectAssessing the Project
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Scale Nature 1 2 3 4 5
Relative Size
Impact on Organization
No impact on the organization
Success or failure will be noticed but will not significantly impact organization
Significant impact on the organization if project fails or succeeds. No impact on Executive
Project will affect executives depending on the outcome
Project will affect entire organization, depending on the outcome
Complexity Barriers to Communication
One group, know each other well
>1 discipline but no more than two organizations involved
>2 Cultures, many professional and technical disciplines
Several disciplines, geographically distributed, several organizations
Numerous disciplines, organizations and cultures. Different languages
Uncertainty Definition of end of Project
Clearly defined objectives and end-product
Objective clear, end product defined, approach flexible
Objectives understood, solutions and options not finalized
Objective not clear, several possible outcomes
Objective and end product unclear
Constraints Flexibility: Time, Cost and Performance
No limitations on resources, time. Flexibility in scope and quality
Some flexibility in Time OR cost to met expected Performance
Realistic schedule and budget for the performance expected by the client
Tight schedule and budget. No room for error in performance criteria (scope and quality)
Inadequate budget and/or schedule to meet exacting performance requirements
Ugliness Level of attractiveness of the project
Exciting, prestigious project, excellent image
Working on this project will likely be a positive experience
Will neither excite nor disappoint participants. Safe workplace
Challenging project and difficult work environment
Project will damage image and reputation of participants. Unhealthy work environment
42060240Assessing the ProjectAssessing the Project
720
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMARTTaskTask
RunnerRunner
RepeaterRepeater
RenegadeRenegade
1010
100100
10001000
Assessing the ProjectAssessing the Project
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Runner ProjectsRunner Projects
115 110 110 100 100
BudgetE.A.C.
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Repeater ProjectsRepeater Projects
95 95 95 98 100
Budget
E.A.C.
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Renegade ProjectsRenegade Projects
50 40 55 80 100
Budget
E.A.C.
Team A Team B
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Join the Dots…Join the Dots…
SuccessMeasures
PM Maturity
Challenge
Trust
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
InspirationLead
Manage
Administer
Do
Wisdom
Knowledge
Information
Data
Judgment
Competence
Skills
Competen
ceTrust
Competen
ceTrust
Integrity
TrustIntegrity
Trust
Intuituve
TrustIntuituve
Trust
A new look at our World…A new look at our World…
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
What SMART Project Management® is about . . .
What SMART Project Management® is about . . .
PM Skills
Runners
(Commodity - Product)
Runners(Commodity - Product)
Repeaters(Product - Service)
Repeaters(Product - Service)
Renegades(Service - Relationship)
Renegades(Service - Relationship)
Leadership& Trust
Leadership& Trust
With thanks to Jennifer Krahn and Ralph Levene
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
IntuitionIntuition
• Red Trust = “It feels Right”
• Rapid Processing + Emotion
• Rapid processing > Synapses
• More connections > Better
• A Course that works . . .
• Red Trust = “It feels Right”
• Rapid Processing + Emotion
• Rapid processing > Synapses
• More connections > Better
• A Course that works . . .
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Join the Dots…Join the Dots…
SuccessMeasures
PM Maturity
Challenge
Trust
eDNA
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Matching Project and Leader
Matching Project and Leader
• Top Five Skills
• Bottom five skills
• How to make the Bottom float to the Top
• Trust, Courage, Wisdom…
• Top Five Skills
• Bottom five skills
• How to make the Bottom float to the Top
• Trust, Courage, Wisdom…
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
The Bottom Five PM Competencies
The Bottom Five PM Competencies
• Technical skills
• Political savvy
• Relevant prior experience
• Knowledge in project area
• Charisma
• Technical skills
• Political savvy
• Relevant prior experience
• Knowledge in project area
• Charisma
Based on work by Dr. J. Krahn
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
The Top Five PM Competencies
The Top Five PM Competencies
• People skills
• Leadership
• Listening
• Strong at building teams
• Verbal communication
• People skills
• Leadership
• Listening
• Strong at building teams
• Verbal communication
Based on work by Dr. J. Krahn
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Large project team leadership people skills
strong team building
High riskrisk management leadership planning
Ineffective contractual terms
conflict resolution
relevant experience leadership
Complex project (many disciplines) leadership people skills listening
Competence in ContextCompetence in ContextBased on work by Dr. J. Krahn
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Competence in ContextCompetence in Context
Lacks scope clarity leadership
has vision purpose goals
risk management
Not sr. mgt. supported leadership self confidence people skills
Large scope leadership planningrelevant prior experience
High uncertainty
risk management
expectation management leadership
Based on work by Dr. J. Krahn
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Competence in ContextCompetence in Context
Challenging politics people skills
verbal comm.
leadership, expectation mgt
Very little clarity (client)
expectation management leadership people skills
Novel project leadership people skills
has vision purpose goals
Constrained resources leadership planning
people skills, balance priorities
Based on work by Dr. J. Krahn
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Join the Dots…Join the Dots…
SuccessMeasures
PM Maturity
Challenge
Trust
eDNA
BusinessContext
Project
Program
Enterprise
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
A few important QuestionsA few important Questions
• What’s the Problem?
• What kind of Project is this anyhow?
• Drivers?
• Risks and Uncertainty?
• Can we kill the Monster Project?
• What’s the Problem?
• What kind of Project is this anyhow?
• Drivers?
• Risks and Uncertainty?
• Can we kill the Monster Project?
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Solving the Right ProblemSolving the Right Problem
He keeps telling us what the solution is,but we still don’t knowwhat the problem is…
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Redefining SuccessRedefining Success• Successful “Failed” Projects
– The Alberta S- Projects– Sydney Opera House– SAP, other ERP Systems– Lots of others
• Failed “Successes”– Avro Arrow– Euro Tunnel– Most Mergers and Acquisitions– Lots of others…
• Successful “Failed” Projects– The Alberta S- Projects– Sydney Opera House– SAP, other ERP Systems– Lots of others
• Failed “Successes”– Avro Arrow– Euro Tunnel– Most Mergers and Acquisitions– Lots of others…
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Decision SkillsDecision Skills
• Trust types
• Red Trust – Intuition
• Decisions bigger than the data
• Turbo-brains
• Soft is hard
• Hard is easy
• Trust types
• Red Trust – Intuition
• Decisions bigger than the data
• Turbo-brains
• Soft is hard
• Hard is easy
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Difficult DecisionsDifficult DecisionsThinData
ThinnerInformation
AddKnowledge
AddWisdom
BigDecision
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Join the Dots…Join the Dots…
SuccessMeasures
PM Maturity
Challenge
Trust
eDNA
Project
Program
Enterprise
BusinessContext
Project Languagevs.
Business Language
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Management Made SimpleManagement Made Simple
Lie about whatwe can do
Lie about whatwe can do
FictionalTeam of
Super-heroes
FictionalTeam of
Super-heroes
Confirm thelie
Confirm thelie
Do work and Lie some moreDo work and
Lie some more
AccusationsAccusationsBlameBlame
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Join the Dots…Join the Dots…
SuccessMeasures
PM Maturity
Challenge
Trust
eDNA
Project
Program
Enterprise
BusinessContext
Project Languagevs.
Business Language
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Turbo-BrainsTurbo-Brains
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Join the Dots…Join the Dots…
SuccessMeasures
PM Maturity
Challenge
Trust
eDNA
Project
Program
Enterprise
BusinessContext
Project Languagevs.
Business Language
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Managing IS/IT Projectswith
SMART Project Management®
Managing IS/IT Projectswith
SMART Project Management®
Practice and Principles.Practice and Principles.
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Pick what we want to coverPick what we want to cover
1. Select top topics
2. Agree on sequence
3. Do what we can…
4. Know where to go for more help…
5. Get involved in SMART
1. Select top topics
2. Agree on sequence
3. Do what we can…
4. Know where to go for more help…
5. Get involved in SMART
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Select top topicsSelect top topics
1. Categorizing projects
2. Charter overview3. SBS4. Risk
Management5. Schedules that
work6. Priorities
1. Categorizing projects
2. Charter overview3. SBS4. Risk
Management5. Schedules that
work6. Priorities
7. REAL Control8. Stakeholder
Alignment9. Contingencies10.Progress
Meetings11.15 Questions12.SMART Project
GPS™
7. REAL Control8. Stakeholder
Alignment9. Contingencies10.Progress
Meetings11.15 Questions12.SMART Project
GPS™
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Agree on sequenceAgree on sequence
Can we follow the notes?
Can we skip important bits?
Are we OK with a few tips and hints?
Can we follow the notes?
Can we skip important bits?
Are we OK with a few tips and hints?
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Do what we can…Do what we can…
• First time for this workshop
• Need your help
• Have fun…
• First time for this workshop
• Need your help
• Have fun…
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Know where more help is…Know where more help is…
• SMI and QeD Inc.
• Beware of Uncertified Practitioners
• SMI and QeD Inc.
• Beware of Uncertified Practitioners
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Get involved in SMARTGet involved in SMART
• Certification
• Licensed Practitioners
• Corporate Licenses
• Certification
• Licensed Practitioners
• Corporate Licenses
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
SMART PM® Planning AgendaSMART PM® Planning Agenda
• Overview of SMART Project Management• Alignment
– Three Key Questions– Priority Triangle– SMART Breakdown Structure
• Schedule and Budgeting– 3-D Schedule– PLO Estimating for Durations, Effort and Costs
• Risk and Uncertainty Management– Finding and Mitigating– Communication– Target Setting
• Turning a Plan into a Successful Project– Scheduling for Reality– Rolling Wave Planning– Contracting Strategies– Reporting and Documentation
• Overview of SMART Project Management• Alignment
– Three Key Questions– Priority Triangle– SMART Breakdown Structure
• Schedule and Budgeting– 3-D Schedule– PLO Estimating for Durations, Effort and Costs
• Risk and Uncertainty Management– Finding and Mitigating– Communication– Target Setting
• Turning a Plan into a Successful Project– Scheduling for Reality– Rolling Wave Planning– Contracting Strategies– Reporting and Documentation
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Objective
• Learning to have fun as Project Managers and as Teams
• Basics of how projects work• Some survival Tools and Techniques• A different (management) look at what we do• Understanding our stakeholders• Help us choose the right next step• Improve career opportunities?
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
SMART DifferencesSMART Differences
•Redefined Project Management
•Redefined and added to PMBOK
•Respond to Uncertainty
•More Proactive and Flexible
•Faster, Cheaper and Better Projects
•Redefined Project Management
•Redefined and added to PMBOK
•Respond to Uncertainty
•More Proactive and Flexible
•Faster, Cheaper and Better Projects
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Answer this . . .You have $45 Million to spend. Which of the following projects would you pick? Why? What else do you need to know?
You have $45 Million to spend. Which of the following projects would you pick? Why? What else do you need to know?
PROJECT BUDGET ($x1,000)1. Upgrade Hardware & Intranet for
50 Business units 12,6002. PeopleSoft Implementation (3 modules) 22,7003. Health/Fitness Facilities for Staff 7,4004. Top-up of Pension Liabilities 42,8005. Upgrade Risk Management System 8,7506. Full SOX Compliance 34,500
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Our Organization, Unit, Program, Project
Our Organization, Unit, Program, Project
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Where Our Project FitsWhere Our Project Fits• Tie to Corporate Strategy
• Part of program?
• Only one Department or Bus. Unit?
• Who are Stakeholders?
• How do decisions get made?
• Who Sanctions/Funds?
• Measures for success consistent?
• Tie to Corporate Strategy
• Part of program?
• Only one Department or Bus. Unit?
• Who are Stakeholders?
• How do decisions get made?
• Who Sanctions/Funds?
• Measures for success consistent?
Powered by SMART
SMART PM™ Charter...SMART PM™ Charter...
S.B.SS.B.S
MissionKRs
(Stakeholders)
Deliverables
Exclusions
3-D Schedule3-D Schedule
Won,Done, WhoWon,Done, Who
3 Questions3 Questions
O ImpactO ProbabilityO ControllabilityO Monte Carlo SimulationO RegisterO Mitigation PlanO Contingency Mgt.
O ImpactO ProbabilityO ControllabilityO Monte Carlo SimulationO RegisterO Mitigation PlanO Contingency Mgt.
T,P,$T,P,$
PriorityTrianglePriorityTriangle
RACI+ ChartRACI+ Chart Risk ManagementRisk Management
DeliverableDeliverableDeliverable
DeliverableDeliverable
Deliverable Deliverable
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
Decision Decision
NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds
Project Details
O DeliverableO Gantt ChartO People/RolesO Plus...
t $
GPSGPS
© SMART Management Inc. andFrancis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2001
Powered by SMART
Won,Done, WhoWon,Done, Who
3 Questions3 Questions3-D Schedule3-D Schedule
O ImpactO ProbabilityO ControllabilityO Monte Carlo SimulationO RegisterO Mitigation PlanO Contingency Mgt.
O ImpactO ProbabilityO ControllabilityO Monte Carlo SimulationO RegisterO Mitigation PlanO Contingency Mgt.
T,P,$T,P,$
PriorityTrianglePriorityTriangle
RACI+ ChartRACI+ Chart Risk ManagementRisk Management
DeliverableDeliverableDeliverable
DeliverableDeliverable
Deliverable Deliverable
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
Decision Decision
NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds
Project Details
O DeliverableO Gantt ChartO People/RolesO Plus...
t $
GPSGPS
SMART PM™ Charter...SMART PM™ Charter...
© SMART Management Inc. 2001 andFrancis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2001
S.B.SS.B.S
MissionKRs
(Stakeholders)
Deliverables
Exclusions
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
MissionMission
• What’s the PROBLEM?• What’s the SOLUTION?• Are there CHOICES?• What are you trying to achieve?• “Elevator Statement” summarizing this.
• What’s the PROBLEM?• What’s the SOLUTION?• Are there CHOICES?• What are you trying to achieve?• “Elevator Statement” summarizing this.
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Answering 15 QuestionsAnswering 15 Questions
• What is the PROBLEM?• Is this the right project?• Connection to strategy?• Stakeholders’ needs?• Key results for success?• Success ranges ($,T,P)?• Risks known?• Risk mitigation?
• What is the PROBLEM?• Is this the right project?• Connection to strategy?• Stakeholders’ needs?• Key results for success?• Success ranges ($,T,P)?• Risks known?• Risk mitigation?
• Delivery processes clear?• Deliverables defined?• Stakeholders aligned• Priorities clarified• Team effective?• Communications clear?• Contracting strategy OK?
• Delivery processes clear?• Deliverables defined?• Stakeholders aligned• Priorities clarified• Team effective?• Communications clear?• Contracting strategy OK?
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Scope of Projects (SBS)Scope of Projects (SBS)
• What The SBS is
• How it works
• Important points about SBSs
• Your Project’s SBS
• Be prepared to present (one team)
• What The SBS is
• How it works
• Important points about SBSs
• Your Project’s SBS
• Be prepared to present (one team)
Powered by SMART
Won,Done, WhoWon,Done, Who
3 Questions3 Questions3-D Schedule3-D Schedule
O ImpactO ProbabilityO ControllabilityO Monte Carlo SimulationO RegisterO Mitigation PlanO Contingency Mgt.
O ImpactO ProbabilityO ControllabilityO Monte Carlo SimulationO RegisterO Mitigation PlanO Contingency Mgt.
T,P,$T,P,$
PriorityTrianglePriorityTriangle
RACI+ ChartRACI+ Chart Risk ManagementRisk Management
DeliverableDeliverableDeliverable
DeliverableDeliverable
Deliverable Deliverable
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
Decision Decision
NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds
Project Details
O DeliverableO Gantt ChartO People/RolesO Plus...
t $
GPSGPS
SMART PM™ Charter...SMART PM™ Charter...
© SMART Management Inc. 2001 andFrancis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2001
S.B.SS.B.S
MissionKRs
(Stakeholders)
Deliverables
Exclusions
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
MissionMission
Key Result Expectations
Deliverables
SBS – Structure
Stakeholder Stakeholder Stakeholder Stakeholder
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
SBS – ComponentsSBS – Components
• Mission
• Stakeholders
• Key Results
• Deliverables
• Parking Lot
• Exclusions
• Mission
• Stakeholders
• Key Results
• Deliverables
• Parking Lot
• Exclusions
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
SBS – MissionSBS – Mission
• Elevator Statement• Captures the PROBLEM• Shows the SOLUTION• Indicates the VALUE• Process:
– Free thinking– Some parts may turn out to belong elsewhere– Wordsmith later
• Elevator Statement• Captures the PROBLEM• Shows the SOLUTION• Indicates the VALUE• Process:
– Free thinking– Some parts may turn out to belong elsewhere– Wordsmith later
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
SBS – Key Results and Stakeholders
SBS – Key Results and Stakeholders
• Start with the Stakeholders– Identify them– Group them with others who have similar
expectations (KRs)– Rank them for this project
• What does each stakeholder group expect?– Key Results are Measurable– OK to share with other Stakeholder groups
• Start with the Stakeholders– Identify them– Group them with others who have similar
expectations (KRs)– Rank them for this project
• What does each stakeholder group expect?– Key Results are Measurable– OK to share with other Stakeholder groups
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
SBS – DeliverablesSBS – Deliverables
• All Deliverables have a physical manifestation• KRs are met through Deliverables• Validate that KR Metric can be measured when last
Deliverable is done• Break big Deliverables into smaller ones• Break those into more detail as detail appears• Add additional layers when it makes sense to do so• Add Price (PLO), Elapsed Time (PLO) and Effort (PLO) for
each Deliverable• Estimates roll up and down on SBS• Add SBS codes.
• All Deliverables have a physical manifestation• KRs are met through Deliverables• Validate that KR Metric can be measured when last
Deliverable is done• Break big Deliverables into smaller ones• Break those into more detail as detail appears• Add additional layers when it makes sense to do so• Add Price (PLO), Elapsed Time (PLO) and Effort (PLO) for
each Deliverable• Estimates roll up and down on SBS• Add SBS codes.
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Deliverable TypesDeliverable Types
• Input and Output Deliverables
• Process and Result
• Must, Should and Nice
• Existing and Future
• Controllable and Uncontrollable (usually Input deliverables)
• Input and Output Deliverables
• Process and Result
• Must, Should and Nice
• Existing and Future
• Controllable and Uncontrollable (usually Input deliverables)
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
SBS – Parking LotSBS – Parking Lot
• Place to put Deliverables if:– Maybe in Scope– Too ill-defined to understand– Have been excluded but are sensitive
• Parking lot holds any and all other issues that need more time to understand or that have not been excluded yet – but are expected to.
• Place to put Deliverables if:– Maybe in Scope– Too ill-defined to understand– Have been excluded but are sensitive
• Parking lot holds any and all other issues that need more time to understand or that have not been excluded yet – but are expected to.
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
SBS – ExclusionsSBS – Exclusions
• All specifically excluded items
• Need to explain to stakeholders:– Not in Exclusions not same as included!– Purpose is to help delimit
• This list needs to be added to whenever a stakeholder asks for something that is not in scope.
• All specifically excluded items
• Need to explain to stakeholders:– Not in Exclusions not same as included!– Purpose is to help delimit
• This list needs to be added to whenever a stakeholder asks for something that is not in scope.
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Other SBS TipsOther SBS Tips
• “Cloudy” Issues– Temporary definition – Based on budget or other resources
• Hidden Agenda items– Put suspects in Exclusions, stand back!
• Decide what governs for control:– T: Stop when time runs out– P: Must Should and Nice– C: Do what you can for Budget
• “Cloudy” Issues– Temporary definition – Based on budget or other resources
• Hidden Agenda items– Put suspects in Exclusions, stand back!
• Decide what governs for control:– T: Stop when time runs out– P: Must Should and Nice– C: Do what you can for Budget
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Using SBS for Estimating - 1Using SBS for Estimating - 1
• Estimate what is in scope
• Each deliverable:– Money– Effort– Elapsed Time– Specification
• Estimate what is in scope
• Each deliverable:– Money– Effort– Elapsed Time– Specification
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Using SBS for Estimating – 2Using SBS for Estimating – 2
• Range Estimates• State and document Assumptions• Parent value = sum of children values
(before contingency)• Add contingencies for targets• Test and cross-check for reality
– Task team size/communication/coord’n– Timing and availability of resources– In-house v. Outsourced– Basis of Estimate
• Range Estimates• State and document Assumptions• Parent value = sum of children values
(before contingency)• Add contingencies for targets• Test and cross-check for reality
– Task team size/communication/coord’n– Timing and availability of resources– In-house v. Outsourced– Basis of Estimate
Powered by SMART
S.B.SS.B.S
MissionKRs
(Stakeholders)
Deliverables
Exclusions
3-D Schedule3-D Schedule
O ImpactO ProbabilityO ControllabilityO Monte Carlo SimulationO RegisterO Mitigation PlanO Contingency Mgt.
O ImpactO ProbabilityO ControllabilityO Monte Carlo SimulationO RegisterO Mitigation PlanO Contingency Mgt.
T,P,$T,P,$
PriorityTrianglePriorityTriangle
RACI+ ChartRACI+ Chart Risk ManagementRisk Management
DeliverableDeliverableDeliverable
DeliverableDeliverable
Deliverable Deliverable
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
Decision Decision
NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds
Project Details
O DeliverableO Gantt ChartO People/RolesO Plus...
t $
GPSGPS
SMART PM™ Charter...SMART PM™ Charter...
Won,Done, WhoWon,Done, Who
3 Questions3 Questions
© SMART Management Inc. 2001 andFrancis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2001
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Three Key Questions
• How do you know the project is DONE?
• How do you know the project is successful (You’ve WON)?
• WHO gets to make the call on questions 1 and 2! (ask this first)?1
23
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Criteria for SuccessCriteria for Success
• The Three Questions asked at the PARTY at end of this SUCCESSFUL project
• Cross-check with SBS components
• The Three Questions asked at the PARTY at end of this SUCCESSFUL project
• Cross-check with SBS components
Powered by SMART
S.B.SS.B.S
MissionKRs
(Stakeholders)
Deliverables
Exclusions
3-D Schedule3-D Schedule
Won,Done, WhoWon,Done, Who
3 Questions3 Questions
O ImpactO ProbabilityO ControllabilityO Monte Carlo SimulationO RegisterO Mitigation PlanO Contingency Mgt.
O ImpactO ProbabilityO ControllabilityO Monte Carlo SimulationO RegisterO Mitigation PlanO Contingency Mgt.
RACI+ ChartRACI+ Chart Risk ManagementRisk Management
DeliverableDeliverableDeliverable
DeliverableDeliverable
Deliverable Deliverable
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
Decision Decision
NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds
Project Details
O DeliverableO Gantt ChartO People/RolesO Plus...
t $
GPSGPS
SMART PM™ Charter...SMART PM™ Charter...
T,P,$T,P,$
PriorityTrianglePriorityTriangle
© SMART Management Inc. andFrancis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2001
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
AlignedAligned
T P
C
Align the Architect…
… and then the others…
PMPM
Sys.Arch.Sys.Arch.
Dev’tteamDev’tteam
SubsSubs SponsorSponsor
UsersUsers
SponsorBOSS
SponsorBOSS
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Checking Value against Priorities
Checking Value against Priorities
• TEST Priority Triangle and KRs
• TEST Priority Triangle and MISSION
• TEST Priority Triangle and STAKEHOLDER EXPECTATIONS
• TEST Priority Triangle and 3 KEY QUESTIONS
• TEST Priority Triangle and KRs
• TEST Priority Triangle and MISSION
• TEST Priority Triangle and STAKEHOLDER EXPECTATIONS
• TEST Priority Triangle and 3 KEY QUESTIONS
Powered by SMART
RACI+ ChartRACI+ Chart
SMART PM™ CharterSMART PM™ Charter
S.B.SS.B.S
MissionKRs
(Stakeholders)
Deliverables
Exclusions
Won,Done, WhoWon,Done, Who
3 Questions3 Questions
O ImpactO ProbabilityO ControllabilityO Monte Carlo SimulationO RegisterO Mitigation PlanO Contingency Mgt.
O ImpactO ProbabilityO ControllabilityO Monte Carlo SimulationO RegisterO Mitigation PlanO Contingency Mgt.
T,P,$T,P,$
PriorityTrianglePriorityTriangle
Risk ManagementRisk Management
Project Details
O DeliverableO Gantt ChartO People/RolesO Plus...
t $
GPSGPS
3-D Schedule3-D Schedule
DeliverableDeliverableDeliverable
DeliverableDeliverable
Deliverable Deliverable
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
Decision Decision
NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds
© SMART Management Inc. andFrancis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2001
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Scheduling BackwardsScheduling Backwards
• WHY BACKWARDS?– Self-fulfilling Prophesy– Explicit, not implicit assumptions– Understand when a project drops dead– Hard work!– Forces more linear thinking– Focus is on getting there and success
• WHY BACKWARDS?– Self-fulfilling Prophesy– Explicit, not implicit assumptions– Understand when a project drops dead– Hard work!– Forces more linear thinking– Focus is on getting there and success
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
The 3-D Schedule ProcessThe 3-D Schedule Process
• Move result deliverables from the SBS to the 3-D Schedule
• Plan from the back to the front• Use PLO estimates• Conduct risk analysis and mitigation• Target and re-plan from the front to the
back
• Move result deliverables from the SBS to the 3-D Schedule
• Plan from the back to the front• Use PLO estimates• Conduct risk analysis and mitigation• Target and re-plan from the front to the
back
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
3-D Plan Durations3-D Plan Durations
• Add PLO durations/costs for each process
• Perfect (P) - how much duration & cost under perfect conditions?
• Likely (L) - how much duration & cost under under normal circumstances?
• Outrageous (O) - how much duration & cost if past problems arise again?
• Add PLO durations/costs for each process
• Perfect (P) - how much duration & cost under perfect conditions?
• Likely (L) - how much duration & cost under under normal circumstances?
• Outrageous (O) - how much duration & cost if past problems arise again?
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Know what’s Next?: 1Know what’s Next?: 1
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
3-D Planning…adding Target Durations
Process ProcessProcessProcess
DeliverableDeliverable
Deliverable
Deliverable
Deliverable
DeliverableDeliverable
Deliverable
Deliverable Deliverable
Deliverable
PLOT PLOT PLOT PLOT
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
2-D and 1-D Schedules2-D and 1-D Schedules
• In addition to Drop Dead Dates (3-D)– When a Deliverable is to be delivered
• Definition Dates (2-D)– When deliverables have FINAL
Definition
• Decisions (1-D)– Usually needed before we can define
our deliverables . . .
• In addition to Drop Dead Dates (3-D)– When a Deliverable is to be delivered
• Definition Dates (2-D)– When deliverables have FINAL
Definition
• Decisions (1-D)– Usually needed before we can define
our deliverables . . .
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Process ProcessProcessProcess
DeliverableDeliverable
Deliverable
Deliverable
Deliverable
DeliverableDeliverable
Deliverable
Deliverable Deliverable
Deliverable
PLOT PLOT PLOT PLOT
What is behind a 3-D?What is behind a 3-D?
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Checks and Balances
• Plan twice, and in different ways• Compare results• Get the right people involved• Manage what is important and
volatile more than anything• Keep people informed and
involved
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
EXERCISEEXERCISE
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Re-checking your PlanRe-checking your Plan
• Do you have the resources?• Work Density?• Team and group sizes?
• Do you have the resources?• Work Density?• Team and group sizes?
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
EXERCISEEXERCISE
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Stakeholder ManagementStakeholder Management
• Get right people involved at start
• Engage Sponsor
• Sign ON to Charter
• Track Key Results and Changes against interested Stakeholders
• Get engaged at CheckPoints and OffRamps
• Get right people involved at start
• Engage Sponsor
• Sign ON to Charter
• Track Key Results and Changes against interested Stakeholders
• Get engaged at CheckPoints and OffRamps
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Quick ReviewQuick Review
• Scope and SBS– Estimating– Specification
• Priority Triangle
• High-level Scheduling
• Stakeholder Management
• Checking the Plan
• Scope and SBS– Estimating– Specification
• Priority Triangle
• High-level Scheduling
• Stakeholder Management
• Checking the Plan
Powered by SMART
S.B.SS.B.S
MissionKRs
(Stakeholders)
Deliverables
Exclusions
3-D Schedule3-D Schedule
Won,Done, WhoWon,Done, Who
3 Questions3 Questions
T,P,$T,P,$
PriorityTrianglePriorityTriangle
RACI+ ChartRACI+ Chart
DeliverableDeliverableDeliverable
DeliverableDeliverable
Deliverable Deliverable
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
Decision Decision
NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds
Project Details
O DeliverableO Gantt ChartO People/RolesO Plus...
t $
GPSGPSO ImpactO ProbabilityO ControllabilityO Monte Carlo SimulationO RegisterO Mitigation PlanO Contingency Mgt.
O ImpactO ProbabilityO ControllabilityO Monte Carlo SimulationO RegisterO Mitigation PlanO Contingency Mgt.
Risk ManagementRisk Management
SMART PM™ Charter...SMART PM™ Charter...
© SMART Management Inc. andFrancis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2001
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
PM Past - Project SelectionPM Past - Project Selection
Project A Project B
48% TV 24%15% Probability 95%33% P50 TV 33%
?
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
PM Past - CPMPM Past - CPM
ActivityA
ActivityB
10
100/10/112
9/10/12What aSurprise!What aSurprise!
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Risk evaluation and management
Find the Risks
Qualitative then Quantitative Analysis
Classifyand
Prioritize
DevelopManagementStrategy& Plan
Manage toTarget Plan
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Before we get into Risk… Before we get into Risk…
• Basic Estimating – Elapsed time – Cost – Effort – Resources
• PLO Estimates for each of these
• Defining deliverables by Estimate
• Basic Estimating – Elapsed time – Cost – Effort – Resources
• PLO Estimates for each of these
• Defining deliverables by Estimate
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Basic Estimate for a Deliverable
Basic Estimate for a Deliverable
• Define the Deliverable: a Report• Best guess at elapsed time (10 days)• Best guess at Cost ($ 50,000) • Best guess at Effort (60 hrs) • Best guess at Resources
– Consultant (fee of $50,000)– Briefing (10 hrs); Progress(5hrs);Draft review (15 hrs);
Present findings(10+5 hrs); listen and Action (3x5 hrs) – Consultant at $200 per hour burns 250 hours for fee.
Equals 25 hours/day ave. so just over 3 people needed, and peak workforce at about 4 or 5.
– Our resources: Me, Boss and 2 Stakeholders• THESE ARE SINGLE POINT ESTIMATES.
• Define the Deliverable: a Report• Best guess at elapsed time (10 days)• Best guess at Cost ($ 50,000) • Best guess at Effort (60 hrs) • Best guess at Resources
– Consultant (fee of $50,000)– Briefing (10 hrs); Progress(5hrs);Draft review (15 hrs);
Present findings(10+5 hrs); listen and Action (3x5 hrs) – Consultant at $200 per hour burns 250 hours for fee.
Equals 25 hours/day ave. so just over 3 people needed, and peak workforce at about 4 or 5.
– Our resources: Me, Boss and 2 Stakeholders• THESE ARE SINGLE POINT ESTIMATES.
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Why Ranges?Why Ranges?
• Fixed Point implies NO RISK
• Reality is estimates=guesses
• Ranges supply added information– Uncertainty– Possible risks– Different opinions and rationales– Cross-checks.
• Fixed Point implies NO RISK
• Reality is estimates=guesses
• Ranges supply added information– Uncertainty– Possible risks– Different opinions and rationales– Cross-checks.
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
A Good Risk StickyA Good Risk Sticky
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Questions to ask (with apologies to children everywhere)
Questions to ask (with apologies to children everywhere)
• Do we have to?
• Why?
• Why me?
• What’s in it for me?
• Will you show me how to do it?
• Will it hurt?
• Do we have to?
• Why?
• Why me?
• What’s in it for me?
• Will you show me how to do it?
• Will it hurt?
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Issues• Marketplace opportunities• Business, Technology* and
Social (*includes Environmental)
• Competitors and challenge to position
• How will risks change over time• Impact on business• Sunk cost syndrome.
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Prioritizing RisksHI
LO
PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE
IMPACT
LO HI
1122
3344
Consider Priorities:
T, P, C
Consider Break-pointProbability
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Management Options • Ignore - VERY DANGEROUS!• Insure - Insurance and Surety• Contingency - Self-insure• Avoid - Get rid of the risk• Accept - balance of benefits against penalties• Spread or Reduce - Risk Sharing Options• Contract out (Transfer) - Do you know what
you are paying?• Remove - eliminate from project
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Next ExerciseNext Exercise
• Find the Risks on your project:– Brainstorm– Look at PLO estimates and ask “Why?”– Consider Each major deliverable and Process– Look at KRs and Stakeholders– Brainstorm again
• Locate Risks on 3-D Schedule• Place Risks in a Risk Matrix• Assign Type 1 risks to team members and
mitigate them• Revisit PLOs for affected deliverables.
• Find the Risks on your project:– Brainstorm– Look at PLO estimates and ask “Why?”– Consider Each major deliverable and Process– Look at KRs and Stakeholders– Brainstorm again
• Locate Risks on 3-D Schedule• Place Risks in a Risk Matrix• Assign Type 1 risks to team members and
mitigate them• Revisit PLOs for affected deliverables.
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Target and ContingenciesTarget and Contingencies
• Target = A REALISTIC estimate of what we know to get project done at a given probability of success.
• Contingency = additional funds to preserve the REALISTIC estimate but covering the stuff we do not know.
• Target = A REALISTIC estimate of what we know to get project done at a given probability of success.
• Contingency = additional funds to preserve the REALISTIC estimate but covering the stuff we do not know.
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Top-down or Bottom-up?Top-down or Bottom-up?
Element
ElementElement ElementElement
ElementElement
ElementElement Element
ElementElement
12 weeks
9/12/17 weeks9/12/17/15 weeks
Target = L with 3 weeks “float”
3/4/6/5 weeks
3/4/6/5 weeks
2/3/4/4 weeks
3/4/6/5 weeks
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Organizing Contingency - 1Organizing Contingency - 1
• Traditional versus new thinking– 5% or a number based on risk profile?– Spend when you have to or when you
should?– What if you do not spend it?– Hidden versus visible contingencies?
• Traditional versus new thinking– 5% or a number based on risk profile?– Spend when you have to or when you
should?– What if you do not spend it?– Hidden versus visible contingencies?
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Organizing Contingency – 2Organizing Contingency – 2
• How much contingency is reasonable?
• Who holds and controls it?• Who should be involved in
Contingency setting?– Process includes risk assessment– Process requires Sponsor participation
and buy-in
• How much contingency is reasonable?
• Who holds and controls it?• Who should be involved in
Contingency setting?– Process includes risk assessment– Process requires Sponsor participation
and buy-in
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Risk Summary
• Risks are a part of Projects
• Analysis and Management tools are well documented
• They are used with increasing frequency
• Risk managed well plays a large part in project success
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Planning for RealityPlanning for Reality
• What we have:– Schedule (3-D, Gantt, CPM)– Scope (SBS, specifications, Key Results)– Budget (Costs, resources, effort)– Risks (+contingencies, mitigation and revised plans)
• What we need:– Real resource Availability– Real dates and times– Input Deliverables– Output Deliverables– Other Constraints
• What we have:– Schedule (3-D, Gantt, CPM)– Scope (SBS, specifications, Key Results)– Budget (Costs, resources, effort)– Risks (+contingencies, mitigation and revised plans)
• What we need:– Real resource Availability– Real dates and times– Input Deliverables– Output Deliverables– Other Constraints
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Real Calendar and ResourcesReal Calendar and Resources
Raw Schedule
SummerHoliday Season
WinterChristmas Break
Revised Schedule
Any otherconstraints
in thisspace?
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Input and Output DeliverablesInput and Output Deliverables
Raw Schedule
SummerHoliday Season
WinterChristmas Break
Revised Schedule
Any otherconstraints
in thisspace?
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Other Constraints and RealitiesOther Constraints and Realities
• Financing• Approvals• Regulatory requirements• Competing Projects• Supply and Demand• Risks• … and lots more!
• Financing• Approvals• Regulatory requirements• Competing Projects• Supply and Demand• Risks• … and lots more!
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Setting TargetsSetting Targets
• Reduce range to single point for management
• Understand what working with Perfect means
• Likely is unlikely (L=Lie?)
• Target = Team Commitment.
• Reduce range to single point for management
• Understand what working with Perfect means
• Likely is unlikely (L=Lie?)
• Target = Team Commitment.
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
ExerciseExercise
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Resources - the CRITICAL RealityResources - the CRITICAL Reality
• In house or contracted?• Who controls the resources?• Committing to a plan• Work Density, Availability• Learning curves• Expectations for performance:
– Trade-off: cost, time, deliverable performance
• Expectations of team members
• In house or contracted?• Who controls the resources?• Committing to a plan• Work Density, Availability• Learning curves• Expectations for performance:
– Trade-off: cost, time, deliverable performance
• Expectations of team members
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
What to Measure?What to Measure?
• What is important on our project?
• What CAN you measure?
• Why measure it?
• What does that measure tell you?
• Is there value in that measure?
• What is important on our project?
• What CAN you measure?
• Why measure it?
• What does that measure tell you?
• Is there value in that measure?
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Measurement suggestionsMeasurement suggestions
• Deliverables delivered
• When delivered
• Effort used in delivery
• Value for effort/money
• Deliverables delivered
• When delivered
• Effort used in delivery
• Value for effort/money
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Charter ChecklistCharter Checklist
• SBS• 3-D Schedule, incl.
OffRamps and CheckPoints
• 3 Questions• Priority Triangle• Risk Matrix, Schedule• Plan for first weeks• Contracting Strategy• Success Metrics
Agreed
• SBS• 3-D Schedule, incl.
OffRamps and CheckPoints
• 3 Questions• Priority Triangle• Risk Matrix, Schedule• Plan for first weeks• Contracting Strategy• Success Metrics
Agreed
• Team Commitment• Cross-check of
Charter Components• Targets for T,P & C• Answer 1+14
Questions• Know what we Don’t
Know!• Sign-on by
Stakeholders
• Team Commitment• Cross-check of
Charter Components• Targets for T,P & C• Answer 1+14
Questions• Know what we Don’t
Know!• Sign-on by
Stakeholders
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Final Charter CharacteristicsFinal Charter Characteristics
• Reflect realities of what you know
• Cross-checked for consistency
• Sign-on by stakeholders
• Start on detail planning
• Target-based, reflecting ownership and challenge
• Start on delivery . . .
• Reflect realities of what you know
• Cross-checked for consistency
• Sign-on by stakeholders
• Start on detail planning
• Target-based, reflecting ownership and challenge
• Start on delivery . . .
Powered by SMART
SMART PM™ Charter...SMART PM™ Charter...
S.B.SS.B.S
MissionKRs
(Stakeholders)
Deliverables
Exclusions
3-D Schedule3-D Schedule
Won,Done, WhoWon,Done, Who
3 Questions3 Questions
O ImpactO ProbabilityO ControllabilityO Monte Carlo SimulationO RegisterO Mitigation PlanO Contingency Mgt.
O ImpactO ProbabilityO ControllabilityO Monte Carlo SimulationO RegisterO Mitigation PlanO Contingency Mgt.
T,P,$T,P,$
PriorityTrianglePriorityTriangle
RACI+ ChartRACI+ Chart Risk ManagementRisk Management
DeliverableDeliverableDeliverable
DeliverableDeliverable
Deliverable Deliverable
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
ProcessP/L/O/T
Decision Decision
NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds NeedsNeeds
Project Details
O DeliverableO Gantt ChartO People/RolesO Plus...
t $
GPSGPS
© SMART Management Inc. andFrancis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2001
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Project GPSProject GPS
Elapsed Time
Cale
nd
ar
Exp
en
dit
ure
Now
T Q
$
x
R1R2
R3R4
Performance Indicator
Performance Indicator
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Starting to use RACI+ ChartsStarting to use RACI+ Charts
• Deciding what you need on a RACI+
• Setting up your Spreadsheet
• Getting Started on Weekly Plans
• Updating the RACI+ Chart
• Weekly Checklists
• Deciding what you need on a RACI+
• Setting up your Spreadsheet
• Getting Started on Weekly Plans
• Updating the RACI+ Chart
• Weekly Checklists
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Setting up your RACI+ Spreadsheet - 1
Setting up your RACI+ Spreadsheet - 1
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
ExerciseExercise
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Project GPSProject GPS
Elapsed Time
Cale
nd
ar
Exp
en
dit
ure
Now
T Q
$
x
R1R2
R3R4
Performance Indicator
Performance Indicator
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Project GPSProject GPS
Elapsed Time
Cale
nd
ar
Exp
en
dit
ure
Now
T Q
$
x
R1R2
R3R4
Performance Indicator
Performance Indicator
Schedule – 2Schedule – 2
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Schedule – 3Schedule – 3
Project Approved Plan CompleteTech Specs.60 30 40 20
40 60 85 100 75 50
507510010510070
150410
60ΣFTE 1.5 1.75 2.5 2.6 2.5 1.75 1.25
Available FTE Actual FTE
1.5 1.5 2.5 2.5 2.51.5
2.01.5
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
ExerciseExercise
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Cost - 1Cost - 1• Similar principles to Time for
Elapsed Time and Effort
• Add granularity
• Consider tracking by cost codes
• Cost codes same as Deliverables Codes? (good if they are!)
• Separate Effort and Expenditures
• Similar principles to Time for Elapsed Time and Effort
• Add granularity
• Consider tracking by cost codes
• Cost codes same as Deliverables Codes? (good if they are!)
• Separate Effort and Expenditures
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Project GPSProject GPS
Elapsed Time
Cale
nd
ar
Exp
en
dit
ure
Now
T Q
$
x
R1R2
R3R4
Performance Indicator
Performance Indicator
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Project GPSProject GPS
Elapsed Time
Cale
nd
ar
Exp
en
dit
ure
Now
T Q
$
x
R1R2
R3R4
Performance Indicator
Performance Indicator
Cost - 2Cost - 2
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
QualityQuality
• Link to Key Results
• Deliverables Specs.:– Review as they become live– Engage vendor(s) in establishing
standards– Plan to avoid rejection of any product– If you expect problems allow for
recycling in the plan!
• Link to Key Results
• Deliverables Specs.:– Review as they become live– Engage vendor(s) in establishing
standards– Plan to avoid rejection of any product– If you expect problems allow for
recycling in the plan!
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Project GPSProject GPS
Elapsed Time
Cale
nd
ar
Exp
en
dit
ure
Now
T Q
$
x
R1R2
R3R4
Performance Indicator
Performance Indicator
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Progress Meetings - agenda
• What has been done - 5 minutes• What was missed - 5 to 15 minutes• What was impacted, and how do we fix it - up to
20 minutes• What do we deliver next week - 2 minutes• Problems? up to 15 minutes• Review to end of project - up to 10 minutes• TOTAL TIME - no more than one hour once we
know what we are doing
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
The Progress trick
• Communicate informally
• Listen
• Assess Change impacts carefully
• Focus on deliverables
• Have Fun
• Hand over products
• Plan to finish!
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Essentials of effective project control
• Start with a Yardstick (project baseline)• Measure consistently• Control requires a closed loop• Delegation keeps process clean and simple• Optimize paperwork and reporting• Manage by exception• Avoid micro-management• Communicate (both ways)• Be positive (attitude is contagious!)
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Things to measure
• Cost - compare to budget• Work hours - compare with expected
productivity• Schedule - compare to plans• Quality - measure against specifications• Scope - measure against original or
modified deliverables
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Proactive Earned ValueProactive Earned Value
• Used to determine if you will have enough resources next period
• Compare Budget to be spent with available resources:
Budget for next week’s deliverables = 200 hrsResources = 2 full time and 3part time (50%)
personnel. Can the work be delivered in a 40-hr week?
• Used to determine if you will have enough resources next period
• Compare Budget to be spent with available resources:
Budget for next week’s deliverables = 200 hrsResources = 2 full time and 3part time (50%)
personnel. Can the work be delivered in a 40-hr week?
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Planning for CompletionPlanning for Completion
• Like a mini-project: own Plan
• Consider motivation of the team
• Set clear date and drive to it
• Understand where compromises may exist
• Manage Expectations
• Keep stakeholders engaged.
• Like a mini-project: own Plan
• Consider motivation of the team
• Set clear date and drive to it
• Understand where compromises may exist
• Manage Expectations
• Keep stakeholders engaged.
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Course ClosureCourse Closure
• What did you learn
• Issues and advice on the course?
• What can you use tomorrow?
• More emphasis/next course?
• Less Emphasis?
• Good luck on your next project!
• What did you learn
• Issues and advice on the course?
• What can you use tomorrow?
• More emphasis/next course?
• Less Emphasis?
• Good luck on your next project!
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Released in April 2000Released in April 2000
PEOPLE SAY:•A better way •It is so simple•I am using it already
PEOPLE KNOW:•SMART Saved us over $60 million on the first project •…expect over 25% cost and time reduction•Savings are only the beginning…
CanadianBest
Seller2000, 2001,
2002
CanadianBest
Seller2000, 2001,
2002
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
NEW in 2003:Better Contracting
NEW in 2003:Better Contracting
• About 15% of capital investment is wasted
• Trust but Verify• Managing relationships
saves $• What is in the markups?
• About 15% of capital investment is wasted
• Trust but Verify• Managing relationships
saves $• What is in the markups?
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Where are we going next?Where are we going next?
• Demographic Challenge
• Managing Wisdom
• New Coping Skills– Ambiguity– Uncertainty– Change– Innovation– Stretch Performance– More demands on the Project Manager and the Team….
• Demographic Challenge
• Managing Wisdom
• New Coping Skills– Ambiguity– Uncertainty– Change– Innovation– Stretch Performance– More demands on the Project Manager and the Team….
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
Beware of ImitationsBeware of Imitations
SMART Project Management®
SMART Program Management®
SMART Management®
SMART Project Management®
SMART Program Management®
SMART Management®
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
The EndThe End
[email protected] [email protected]
Tel: +1 403 681 7337 Fax: +1 403 208 2403
Quality Enhanced Decisions (QeD) Inc., Calgary, AB Canada.
© Francis Hartman Holdings Ltd. 2003 - 2006
Powered by SMART
We want to earn your BusinessWe want to earn your Business
QeD Inc.,
340 14 Street NW
Calgary, AB
T2N 1Z7
Tel: (403) 681-7337
Fax: (403) 208-2403
QeD Inc.,
340 14 Street NW
Calgary, AB
T2N 1Z7
Tel: (403) 681-7337
Fax: (403) 208-2403
Why QED?• Quod Erat
Demonstrandum: Latin for “It has been proven”.
• Quite Easily Done!• Quality Enhanced
Decisions • QeD Inc is all about
pushing the boundaries of performance
Why QED?• Quod Erat
Demonstrandum: Latin for “It has been proven”.
• Quite Easily Done!• Quality Enhanced
Decisions • QeD Inc is all about
pushing the boundaries of performance