Dusty starburst galaxies_in_the_early_universe_as_revealed_by_gravitational_lensing
Power & Language: Cultural Capital Ellen Manos and Dusty Hiles.
-
Upload
hilda-powers -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Power & Language: Cultural Capital Ellen Manos and Dusty Hiles.
![Page 1: Power & Language: Cultural Capital Ellen Manos and Dusty Hiles.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072111/56649ed95503460f94be82ac/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Power & Language: Cultural Capital
Ellen Manos and Dusty Hiles
![Page 2: Power & Language: Cultural Capital Ellen Manos and Dusty Hiles.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072111/56649ed95503460f94be82ac/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Goals & Objectives
Define Critical Sociolinguistics Explore theories of Critical sociolinguistics
Variation Theory Critical Discourse Analysis Theory
Discuss Critical Sociolinguistics in terms of Micro- and Macro-Linguistic interactions
Define Bourdieu’s ‘Cultural Capital’ Model Discuss Domination through Language and
Resistance to this Power of Language.
![Page 3: Power & Language: Cultural Capital Ellen Manos and Dusty Hiles.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072111/56649ed95503460f94be82ac/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Critical Sociolinguistics
Critical Linguistics is interested in: Ideology, Hegemony Resistance
In terms of resistance this means: denaturalizing ideology & viewing discourse in terms of registers, which vary according to context instead of holding true in all spaces and times.
![Page 4: Power & Language: Cultural Capital Ellen Manos and Dusty Hiles.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072111/56649ed95503460f94be82ac/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Sociolinguistic Theories
School of thought that “language reflects society”—a.k.a.: “variation theory” Chambers (1995):
argued: ‘variation arises from biological & territorial needs for identity.’
Saussure: ‘language as a system of socially neutral signs’
Critical Discourse Analysis Voloshinov (1929;
1973): ‘the forms of signs are conditioned by interaction.’
As a result, language has a certain political or ideological dimension
There are values at play & consequences
![Page 5: Power & Language: Cultural Capital Ellen Manos and Dusty Hiles.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072111/56649ed95503460f94be82ac/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
What Does the Emphasis On CONTENT Enable Us to See? Beyond form & function, this perspective
allows us to think about the ways in which language conventions may be dysfunctional for certain groups. According to Mesthrie, Critical Linguistics
allows us to more easily frame questions like: Which social group is dominant in public speech
and writing? Which groups are merely ‘represented’ and by
what means? Levels of Analysis: Micro & Macro
![Page 6: Power & Language: Cultural Capital Ellen Manos and Dusty Hiles.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072111/56649ed95503460f94be82ac/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Macro Power: “Critical Language Awareness in Action”
2 major examples:
Newspaper Reporting “Smart Bombs,” “Surgical Strikes,” “Collateral
Damages,” “Counterinsurgencies.” Activity: G. Lakoff (1991) Metaphor and War: The
Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf
Sexist Language Activity [what, if any, are the political consequences of
using “patriarchal/sexist” language?]
![Page 7: Power & Language: Cultural Capital Ellen Manos and Dusty Hiles.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072111/56649ed95503460f94be82ac/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
“Micro-Power” in Linguistic Interactions
Consequences of Content & “Concision” Chomsky Clip (Special Features Menu, #1, 14:30-> End)
To what extent do we see: Language Tactics for Dominating the Guest? Emotional Language? Simplification of Reality? Repetition?
Is this Micro-Propaganda?
Underlying Question: Do characteristics of content determine power relations? Always? Sometimes? How so?
![Page 8: Power & Language: Cultural Capital Ellen Manos and Dusty Hiles.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072111/56649ed95503460f94be82ac/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Bourdieu’s Conception of Power:The Cultural Capital Model
![Page 9: Power & Language: Cultural Capital Ellen Manos and Dusty Hiles.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072111/56649ed95503460f94be82ac/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Domination & Resistance
Anti-Language Halliday (1978): ‘Metaphor for everyday language’
Slangs that are overlexicalized: in Calcutta 21 words for ‘bomb’ & 41 for ‘police’
Except that it has the function of: revealing oppositional status in reference to a dominant society
Serves the purposes of: resistance, rebellion, secrecy & humor This may further influence the development of new language
systems—i.e.: Flaaitaal in South Africa; teenager talk How might this be accurate or misleading as a feminist tactic
of re-appropriating patriarchal assumptions/language conventions?
340: personhole; persondate—for manhole; mandate herstory
![Page 10: Power & Language: Cultural Capital Ellen Manos and Dusty Hiles.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072111/56649ed95503460f94be82ac/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Conclusion
Beware of over-determinism Be savvy to more subtle forms of power
relation & their perpetuation across social reality “implicit in the linguistic sign is the potential for
domination and resistance” Recall Bourdieu’s analogy of the ‘linguistic
marketplace’ What are the consequences of this theory
within ESL contexts?