Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
-
Upload
youreinbadhands -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
-
7/27/2019 Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
1/18
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THESEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR
BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
STEVEN POULOS,
Plaintiff,
vs. CASE NO.: 11-23833
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,RMK INSURANCE GROUP, INC. and
JOSE KUDJA, individually, and, REBECCAKUDJA, individually
Defendants.
/
DEFENDANT, ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANYS,
OBJECTIONS TO NUMBERS 1 19 AND 33 40
OF PLAINTIFFS SECOND REQUEST TO PRODUCE
The Defendant, Allstate Insurance Company, hereby responds to numbers 1 19 and 33
401
of Plaintiffs Second Request to Produce, dated May 1, 2013, as follows:
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 1:
Any and all documents, correspondence, emails, notes, interoffice memoranda,
intraoffice memoranda, etc. from January 1, 2010 through and including August 31, 2012, toRichard Cairns in regards to the KUDJA GROUP which advised Richard Cairns that the KUDJA
GROUP had violated Section XVII.b.3 of the Exclusive Agency Agreement, to wit: Thecompany may terminate the agency agreement with cause cause may include but is not limited
to breach of this agreement, fraud, forgery, misrepresentation or conviction of a crime.
A. This production should include, but not limited to, all correspondence between
Richard Cairns and employees of ALLSTATE leading to the determination thatthe KUDJA GROUP AGENCY should be terminated.
B. All lists of policies that were reviewed by ALLSTATE employees prior to or afterthe determination was made that the KUDJA GROUP had violated its agencyagreement specifically including but not limited to the falsification of company
document or other company related items.
1Allstate served responses to numbers 20 32 on July 5, 2013.
-
7/27/2019 Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
2/18
2
C. Any notices, memoranda or other documentation to terminate, not renew orincrease premiums relating to policies which were underwritten by the KUDJA
GROUP. Said notices, memoranda or other documents include but are not limitedto intraoffice memos, letters and/or notices to policy holders and notices and/or
warnings that were sent by ALLSTATE to the KUDJA GROUP.
D. Any audits performed by ALLSTATE regarding the KUDJA GROUPs policies.
E. Any investigations made by ALLSTATE (documents, reports, notes, emails, etc.)providing Richard Cairns the underlying information of the KUDJA GROUPs
violation of the agency agreement.
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 2:
Any and all documents, correspondence, emails, notes, interoffice memoranda,
intraoffice memoranda, etc. from January 1, 2010 through and including August 31, 2012,between ALLSTATE and KUDJA GROUP advising the KUDJA GROUP:
A. Policies which were written had irregularities including but not limited to issuesraised by underwriting, rejection of policies by underwriting and/or request for
clarification regarding issues in the policy by underwriting, specifically includingbut not limited to the policies identified in paragraph 1.B. above.
B. Which policies were the basis for the termination of the agency agreement on
August 4, 2010.
C. Providing the KUDJA GROUP warning(s) to the KUDJA GROUP regardingpolicies being written as improper, fraudulent, or with questionable underwriting
guidelines.
D. Of an audit and its findings regarding the policies written by KUDJA GROUP.
-
7/27/2019 Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
3/18
3
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 3:
Any and all internal memoranda, interoffice memoranda and/or intraoffice memoranda,
emails by and between Richard Cairns, Nidia Pita, Janice Brown-Francois, Debra Shea, MikeSheely regarding the sale of the economic interest in the book of business in the KUDJA
GROUP from July 1, 2010 through and including December 31, 2010.
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 4:
Any and all documents, correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda, interoffice
memoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. from Richard S. Cairns to the KUDJA GROUP
between August 4, 2010 and October 1, 2010, regarding the sale of the economic interest in theKUDJA GROUPs book of business including, but not limited to, any emails from the KUDJAGROUP requesting ALLSTATE sell their book of business or any solicitations by Richard S.
Cairns to sell their book of business.
-
7/27/2019 Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
4/18
4
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 5:
Any and all documents, correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda, interoffice
memoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. from Debra Shea, Richard Cairns, Laura Kaplan to, orfrom, the KUDJA GROUP between August 1, 2010 and October 30, 2010, providinginformation that the economic interest in the book of business of the KUDJA GROUP is for sale,
and what, if any information is to be provided to prospective agents regarding the agency as aviable business, including whether any information should be provided to the prospective buyer
that the agency was closed and the reasons the agency was closed.
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 6:
Any and all documents, pamphlets, correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda,interoffice memoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. between December 1, 2009 through and
including December 31, 2010, regarding the method ALLSTATE utilizes to determine bonusesfor the territory defined as the State of Florida and for salaried employees of ALLSTATE in the
State of Florida.
-
7/27/2019 Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
5/18
5
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 7:
Any and all documents, pamphlets, correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda,
interoffice memoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. between December 1, 2009 through andincluding December 31, 2010 which establish the method ALLSTATE utilizes to determine
whether a territory defined as the State of Florida and for salaried employees of ALLSTATE hasreached its sales goals and what the sales goals were, including but not limited to any hiring
quotas, policy/premium retention quotas issued by ALLSTATE.
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 8:
Any and all documents, pamphlets, correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda,interoffice memoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. between December 1, 2009 through andincluding December 31, 2010 which defines what occurs to an agencys economic interest in its
book of business if the book of business is repurchased by ALLSTATEs corporate entity,defining whether the sales and premiums from said book of business is considered as part of the
territory defined as the State of Florida reaching its sales goals and/or goals necessary forbonuses to be paid to the salaried employees of the territory. The documents shall also include
-
7/27/2019 Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
6/18
6
but not be limited to any financial affect the sale of the economic book of business back to thecorporate entity may have on the State of Florida territorys budget.
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 9:
Any and all documents, correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda, interofficememoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. from Laura Kaplan regarding her lunch meeting with
Plaintiff, STEVEN POULOS, between August 1, 2010 and September 1, 2010 including, but notlimited to, Laura Kaplans calendar for the month of August reflecting any meetings with Steve
Poulos or the KUDJA GROUP and any notes or memoranda relating to said meeting(s).
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 10:
Any and all documents, correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda, interoffice
memoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. to, or from, Debra Shea from August 1, 2010 throughDecember 31, 2010, including but not limited to correspondence, to or from, Steven Poulos,
Janice Brown-Francois, Richard S. Cairns, Nidia Pita, Laura Kaplan regarding the Plaintiffsinquiry about the KUDJA GROUPs closed agency status and the reason for same. Said
documents shall include any notices, emails, documents or otherwise Debra Shea received
-
7/27/2019 Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
7/18
7
including the documents reflecting that RMK INSURANCE GROUP was terminated forfalsification of company documents or any other basis for termination of the KUDJA GROUP.
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 11:
Any and all documents, correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda, interofficememoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. between August 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010 from
Richard S. Cairns to Debra Shea, Laura Kaplan, Nidia Pita, Janice Brown-Francois or fromDebra Shea, Laura Kaplan, Nidia Pita, Janice Brown-Francois or Debra Shea to Richard Cairns
regarding what information the Plaintiff was to be provided regarding the KUDJA GROUPincluding, but not limited to:
A. The reasons the agency was closed.
B. Whether that information was to be withheld.
C. What policies, if any, were to be terminated. What policies if any wereimproperly written.
D. The losses the business would suffer as a result of the policies being falsified.
E. What communication, if any, should be made with the KUDJA GROUP.
F. Which employees should contact the KUDJA GROUP (any documents
memoranda codifying the conversation with the KUDJA GROUP).
G. What agencies would be servicing the KUDJA GROUP policies.
H. What information, if any, should be provided regarding the servicing of theKUDJA GROUP policies.
-
7/27/2019 Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
8/18
8
I. What information, if any, should be provided regarding the servicing of theKUDJA GROUP customer including, but not limited to, sales of additional
insurance needed by said customers.
J. Any emails to Richard S. Cairns regarding the pending agreement with Plaintiff.
K. What documents, if any, were requested by Plaintiff.
L. What responses/documents, if any, were provided to Plaintiff.
M. What requests, if any, were made to the KUDJA GROUP regarding theproduction of documents to Plaintiff including whether ALLSTATE requested
permission to advise Plaintiff of the reasons that the KUDJA GROUPs agencywas terminated.
N. What the KUDJA GROUP advised ALLSTATE the Plaintiff was told as the
reason for the agency termination.
O. Defining what explanation(s) was to be given to the KUDJA GROUPcustomers/policyholders who prepared the memorandum as to what was to be told
to the KUDJA GROUP customers/policyholders. What, if any, writtendocumentation was forwarded to the KUDJA GROUP customers/policyholders.
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 12:
Any and all documents, correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda, interofficememoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. from August 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010, fromthe KUDJA GROUP to Richard S. Cairns, Debra Shea, Laura Kaplan, Nidia Pita, Janice Brown-
Francois and Mike Sheely regarding agents in the geographic location servicing the KUDJAGROUPs customers.
-
7/27/2019 Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
9/18
9
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 13:
Any and all documents, correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda, interoffice
memoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. to or from Mike Sheely from August 1, 2010 throughand including December 31, 2010 regarding the KUDJA GROUP customers and/or
policyholders and a determination of who will be providing service to said customers and/orpolicyholders. Said documents should include what information, if any, the Plaintiff was to be
told regarding the servicing of the KUDJA GROUP policyholders and customers.
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 14:
Any and all documents, correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda, interofficememoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. from December 1, 2009 through December 31, 2010regarding ALLSTATEs policies in regard to the servicing a book of business (policyholders for
an agency which has been terminated i.e. whether said policyholders/customers are to contact theALLSTATE 800 telephone number, whether they are directed to other agencies in the
geographic area, what the written policies of ALLSTATE during the year 2010 that ALLSTATEhad regarding these circumstances.
-
7/27/2019 Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
10/18
-
7/27/2019 Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
11/18
11
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 17:
Any and all documents correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda, interoffice
memoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. from August 4, 2010 through and including December31, 2010 of any termination notices to policyholders/customers of the KUDJA GROUP.
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 18:
Any and all documents correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda, interoffice
memoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. which provide an itemized list of the existing policiesof the KUDJA GROUP on August 1, 2010.
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
-
7/27/2019 Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
12/18
12
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 19:
Any and all documents correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda, interoffice
memoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. which reflect which of said insurance policies of theKUDJA GROUP which ALLSTATE had determined to contain false information and what, if
any, disposition was made by ALLSTATE employees during the period of July 1, 2010 throughDecember 31, 2010 regarding said policies i.e. to terminate said policy, to increase the rate of the
policy, to require the customer to provide further documentation, etc. Said documents shallfurther include any correspondence to the policyholder.
A. The documents should include but not be limited to what affect the false
information had on the rate(s) subsequently offered to thecustomers/policyholders.
B. The number of Castle Key Homeowner HO3 policies that were issued by theKUDJA GROUP on July 1, 2010 and the number of Castle Key HO3 policies
ordered for resinspection by ALLSTATE between July 1, 2010 and February 1,2011.
C. The number of policies that received premium increases and/or were not renewed
from July 1, 2010 through and including March 31, 2011.
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 33:
Any and all documents correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda, interofficememoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. and/or policies or pamphlets issued by ALLSTATE
from December 1, 2009 through and including December 31, 2010 regarding:
-
7/27/2019 Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
13/18
13
A. The sale of agency which has been terminated for cause which provide limitationson ALLSTATEs employees requirements to act as a sales agent for an agency
wishing to sell its book of business such as business brokerage forms, etc.
B. Any policy prohibiting ALLSTATE employees from selling a terminated
agencys economic interest in the book of business.
C. Any directives to ALLSTATEs employees as to what its employees are, or are
not, to provide regarding the sale of a terminated agencys book of business.
D. Statement or policy provided to ALLSTATEs employees regarding what they arepermitted to say, what information they are permitted to provide, what active
interest they may take in the sale of a terminated agencys book of business.
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 34:
Any and all requests to ALLSTATE employees, territorial sales leaders or officersregarding what information could be released to Plaintiff on the KUDJA GROUP by:
A. Debra Shea
B. Laura Kaplan
C. Janice Brown-Francois
D. Nidia Pita
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
-
7/27/2019 Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
14/18
14
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 35:
Any and all documents, correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda, interoffice
memoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. to Plaintiff regarding his attendance at the ALLSTATEtraining, ALLSTATE Education Program and such other required training from September 1,
2010 through December 31, 2010 from:
A. Debra Shea
B. Laura Kaplan
C. Janice Brown-Francois
D. Nidia Pita
E. Richard S. Cairns
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 36:
Any and all documents, correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda, interoffice
memoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. from Richard S. Cairns to Plaintiff regarding meetingsthat he had with Plaintiff specifically including, but not limited to, any discussions Richard S.
Cairns had with Plaintiff regarding:
A. The reasons that KUDJA GROUP was terminated.
-
7/27/2019 Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
15/18
15
B. The servicing of the KUDJA GROUP customers including, but not limited to,
sales of additional insurance needed by said customers.
C. Where the premium or policies for said sales would go.
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 37:
Any and all documents correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda, interofficememoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. from Richard S. Cairns to Debra Shea, Laura Kaplan,
Nidia Pita, Janice Brown-Francois regarding meetings that he had with Plaintiff specificallyincluding, but not limited to, any discussions Richard S. Cairns had with Plaintiff regarding:
A. The reasons that KUDJA GROUP was terminated.
B. The servicing of the KUDJA GROUP customers including, but not limited to,sales of additional insurance needed by said customers.
C. Where the premium or policies for said sales would go.
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
-
7/27/2019 Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
16/18
16
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 38:
Any and all documents, correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda, interoffice
memoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. reflecting the delivery by ALLSTATE to Plaintiff ofpolicies transferred by the KUDJA GROUP to Plaintiff between January 1, 2011 and April 30,
2011.
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 39:
Any and all documents, correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda, interoffice
memoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. to Plaintiff between January 1, 2011 through andincluding March 31, 2012 reflecting the customer policies of KUDJA GROUP who received an
increase of premium in excess of 5% or a letter of termination and any documents relating to theincrease in premium and/or termination of the policy. Said document should include but not be
limited to:
A. Discrepancies between the garaging of the automobile and the mailing address.
B. Commercial policies without a business name as named insured.
C. Customer credit check resulting in a no hit.
D. The ratio of 10/20 policies contained in the KUDJA GROUP book being
transferred versus the average economic book of ALLSTATE INSURANCEagents in Florida.
E. T-docs report.
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
-
7/27/2019 Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
17/18
17
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 40:
Any and all documents, correspondence, letters, emails, internal memoranda, interoffice
memoranda, intraoffice memoranda, etc. which provide the current address and telephonenumber for:
A. Mariano Reis
B. Richard S. Cairns
C. Kaylee Covard
D. Nidia Pita
E. Janice Brown-Francois
F. Debra Shea
G. Laura Kaplan
H. Olga Otero-Brown
I. Jan Buswell
J. Bob Jackson
L. [sic] Mary Lott
M. Joe Cackowski
RESPONSE:
Allstate objects to this request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overbroad,
unduly burdensome, and seeks documents which are irrelevant, not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, confidential, proprietary, work product and privileged.
-
7/27/2019 Poulos v Allstate Litigation: Object's to Request to Produce
18/18
18
Allstate is still reviewing and searching for documents and will produce non-objectionable
responsive documents it discovers to Plaintiff. Allstate reserves the right to amend or
supplement these objections based on its review of any documents.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by e-mail to
Mark S. London, Esquire and Lisa J. London, Esquire at [email protected];
[email protected]; and [email protected], (Counsel for Plaintiff), and Sean L.
Collin and Philip M. Snyder at [email protected] and [email protected],
(Counsel for Defendants, RMK Insurance Group, Inc., n/k/a RMK Consulting Group, Jose Kudja
and Rebecca Kudja) this 31st
day of July, 2013.
s/ Brett M. Carey
LORI J. CALDWELLFlorida Bar No. 0268674
E-mail: [email protected] (primary)E-mail: [email protected] and
[email protected] (secondary)BRETT M. CAREY
Florida Bar No. 0091355E-mail: [email protected] (primary)
E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] (secondary)
RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELLA Professional Association
Lincoln Plaza, Suite 1400300 South Orange Avenue (32801)
Post Office Box 1873Orlando, Florida 32802-1873
Telephone: (407) 872-7300Telecopier: (407) 841-2133
Attorneys for Defendant