Potential value propositions for CSP · Potential value propositions for CSP 3 (adapted from ENA,...
Transcript of Potential value propositions for CSP · Potential value propositions for CSP 3 (adapted from ENA,...
Potential value propositions for CSP
Iain MacGill Associate Professor, School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications Joint Director (Engineering), CEEM
Symposium on The future of
concentrating solar power in
Australia: transitions and benefits
UTS ISF, ASME and Austela
Sydney, June 2013
CSP – a valuable electricity industry resource Energy Resource
– “An available energy supply that can be drawn on when needed.”
– “The ability to deal with a difficult or troublesome energy situation effectively”
Dispatchable Resource – Complex in practice. eg. wind can be more dispatchable than coal if windy.
Wind and PV Energy Resource – Highly variable and only somewhat predictable, downwardly dispatchable
Energy Storage Resource – “the storing of some form of energy that can be drawn upon at a later time to
perform some useful operation”
More broadly, complementary resources – Resources that facilitate successful electricity industry operation with
growing penetrations of variable and somewhat unpredictable RE generation, within an industry where supply must equal demand at all times and all locations within network
CSP Resource? Elements of all of the above 2 Potential value propositions for CSP
3 Potential value propositions for CSP
(adapted from ENA, 2009)
Key storable
primary energy
resources –
coal, gas, CST
Overall mix of
generation
resources and
Tx network
Inherent storage
(eg. CSP) or
additional utility
scale storage
Inherent storage
(eg. CSP) or
specific units Aggregated
demand &
Dx network
Inherent demand
storage (eg. hot
water,) or additional
(eg. EV)
4 Potential value propositions for CSP 4
Value in the NEM – costs, prices, tariffs...
Generation
Sector:-
large
generators
Transmission
Sector: –
TNSPS
Electricity
flow
Derivative trading for risk, investment
Distribution
Sector: -
DNSPS Electricity
flow
Multi-region
five-minute
energy
& FCAS
markets
Intentions,
offers &
payments
Intentions,
bids &
payments
Retailer Z
Retailer 1
Retail
sector
End-use
Sector:-
end-use
equipment
Electricity
flow
End-users
Retail
Markets
Generation
Sector
AEMO: market & system operator
cash flow
10%
50
%
40% 40% Generator Y
Generator 1
(adapted from Outhred, 2007)
Potential value propositions for CSP 5
Two ‘worlds’ for renewables integration
Generation
Sector:-
large
generators
Transmission
Sector Energy flow
Derivative trading (cashflow?)
Distribution
sector Energy flow
Multi-region
five-minute
energy
& FCAS
markets
Intentions,
offers &
payments
Intentions,
bids &
payments
Retailer Z
Retailer 1
Retail
sector
End-use
sector
(including DR)
Energy flow
End-users
Retail
Markets
Embedded
generators Generation
Sector:-
large
generators
AEMO: market & system operator
cash flow
10%
50%
40% cash flow
Centralised
Renewables
Distributed
Renewables +
other DRs
5
The NEM for energy resources w/o inherent
energy storage… and as penetrations grow
6 Potential value propositions for CSP (AEMO, 2011)
Value – nature of underlying RE resource
7 Potential value propositions for CSP (AEMO, 2011)
Commercial value
in wholesale market Wind, as with any other gen
investment shifts mkt outcomes,
& hence revenue of all market
participants. In a restructured
electricity industry, such impacts
an intended outcome.
Wind clearly appears to be
impacting wholesale spot prices
(but note complexities of such
analysis wrt overall impacts,
particularly in longer-term, also
wrt ancillary, derivative prices)
Potential value propositions for CSP
(Forrest and MacGill, 2013)
8
Wind energy ‘value’ in NEM? At high penetrations wind generation earns less – appropriate outcome as
technology without primary energy storage has lower value in electricity
industry than generation with such storage (hydro, gas, coal, CST)
Potential value propositions for CSP (Cutler, Boerema, MacGill and Outhred, Energy Policy J., 2011) 9
Wider energy storage value propositions
10 Potential value propositions for CSP (Sue, 2013)
Recent valuation study for the NEM
11 Potential value propositions for CSP (Sue, 2013)
Potential storage value proposition
12 Potential value propositions for CSP
Aggregation key.. but difficult in practice
13 Potential value propositions for CSP (Sue, 2013)
High renewables future electricity scenarios
100% renewables scenarios a ‘worst’ (best) case scenario
– Close match to high renewable + gas scenarios
Some key questions
– Technical feasibility? – can 100% renewables mixes utilizing highly
variable and somewhat unpredictable solar and wind reliably meet
demand at all times and locations
– If yes, Economic feasibility? – is 100% renewables economically worth
doing given likely costs vs costs of inaction, other options
– If yes, Commercial feasibility? – can we establish commercial frame-
works that drive appropriate deployment at speed and scale required
Alternative scenarios
– BAU a plausible longer-term proposition?
14 Potential value propositions for CSP
CSP plays a valuable complementary role
15 Potential value propositions for CSP (AEMO, 2013)
UNSW least cost 100% RE findings
Without transmission
With transmission
Low cost
High cost
Low cost
High cost
19.6 22.1 21.2 24.4
A$b/yr for AETA high and low
technology cost scenarios
By capacity By energy
Low AETA
cost scenario
High AETA
cost scenario
+ 8.8 TWh
spilled
+ 24.9 TWh
spilled
Generation mix
Wind
PV
CST
Pumped hydro
Hydro
GTs
Current NEM costs
approx. $10b/year.
At carbon prices of
$50-100/tCO2 100%
RE costs can be less
than ‘replacement’
scenario
Potential value propositions for CSP 16 (Elliston et al, 2013)
AEMO 100% RE – least cost capacity mix
17 Potential value propositions for CSP (AEMO, 2013)
AEMO 100% RE – least cost generation mix
18 Potential value propositions for CSP (AEMO, 2013)
Conclusions
CSP a high cost, but potentially high value electricity
industry resource
Current NEM arrangements allow CSP to capture some, but
not all, of its value propositions
CSP value increases with greater deployment of PV, wind
Some key issues
– Future costs
– Scalability
– Hybrid opportunities
– A changing NEM context including uncertain future gas prices, falling
demand
– The competition
19 Potential value propositions for CSP
PV and the Merit Order Effect in the NEM
Many of our publications are available at:
www.ceem.unsw.edu.au
Thank you… and questions