Potential Underfrequency Load Shedding Schemes for the Slovenian Power System

download Potential Underfrequency Load Shedding Schemes for the Slovenian Power System

of 12

Transcript of Potential Underfrequency Load Shedding Schemes for the Slovenian Power System

  • 7/27/2019 Potential Underfrequency Load Shedding Schemes for the Slovenian Power System

    1/12

    Potential Underfrequency Load

    Shedding Schemes for the Slovenian

    Power System

  • 7/27/2019 Potential Underfrequency Load Shedding Schemes for the Slovenian Power System

    2/12

    Introduction

    Power system underfrequency protection

    High importance

    last resort tool Active power imbalance frequency deviation

    Power system islands

    pui,el,pui,mech,pui,el,id

    d2 TT

    tH

    INERTIA FREQUENCY

    CHANGE

    ACCELERATION

    TORQUE

    ( ACTIVE POWER

    IMBALANCE)

  • 7/27/2019 Potential Underfrequency Load Shedding Schemes for the Slovenian Power System

    3/12

    Target performance

    Simple (importance)

    Fast (automation) Highly reliable (local Vs. global issue)

    Highly effective (automation)

    Disconnect as less load as possible

    Compromises are required

    Frequency is a global system parameter

  • 7/27/2019 Potential Underfrequency Load Shedding Schemes for the Slovenian Power System

    4/12

    Current situation

    Traditional scheme

    Simplest kind of UFLS protection Fixed amounts at fixed frequency thresholds

    Under/over shedding might occur

    Frequency Amount of

    Threshold[Hz] disconnected load[%] Comment49.0 10 % Disconnection of 10 % of the total system load

    48.8 15 % Disconnection of additional 15 % of the total system load

    48.4 15 % Disconnection of additional 15 % of the total system load48.0 15 % Disconnection of additional 15 % of the total system load

  • 7/27/2019 Potential Underfrequency Load Shedding Schemes for the Slovenian Power System

    5/12

    Space for improvement

    Adaptive approach more sophisticated

    Follows seriousness of the disturbance Frequency global parameter

    COI calculation required

  • 7/27/2019 Potential Underfrequency Load Shedding Schemes for the Slovenian Power System

    6/12

    Center of Inertia - COI

    Average frequency of the system

    Avoid oscillations

  • 7/27/2019 Potential Underfrequency Load Shedding Schemes for the Slovenian Power System

    7/12

    a) deficit calculation

    Swing equation

    Measurements at t = 0+ Load voltage dependence

    Voltage characteristics vary

    Strongly dependent on a single calculation

    Questionable effectiveness

    Usefull: increased implementation of

    microcontroller based relays

  • 7/27/2019 Potential Underfrequency Load Shedding Schemes for the Slovenian Power System

    8/12

    b) predictive approach

    No deficit calculation

    Predicting the lowest frequency value How to predict the frequency?

    0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00

    Time [sec]

    f[Hz]

    50.0

    51.0

    49.0

    48.0

    47.0

    46.0

    45.0

    frequencyf fMIN,forecast

    FREQUENCYFORECAST

  • 7/27/2019 Potential Underfrequency Load Shedding Schemes for the Slovenian Power System

    9/12

    Predictive approach No. 1

    Source: COI frequency second time derivative

    0 2 4 6 8

    49.0

    50.0

    51.0

    -1

    0

    1

    d2f/dt2 [Hz/s2]

    f[Hz]

    Time [sec]

    48.0

    PDEF = 20 MW, QDEF = 20 Mvar

    PDEF = 40 MW, QDEF = 40 Mvar

    PDEF = 60 MW, QDEF = 60 MvarPDEF = 80 MW, QDEF = 80 Mvar

    47.0

    46.0

    45.0

    44.0

    43.0

    42.0

    Acceleration of the

    frequency

    Approximation andnumerical

    integration

    Iterative procedure!

  • 7/27/2019 Potential Underfrequency Load Shedding Schemes for the Slovenian Power System

    10/12

    Predictive approach No. 2

    Upgrade

    Improvements: First time derivative

    No iterative procedure

    Locus diagram f

    df/dt Idea:

    Part of a spiral similar

    to an ellipsex

    y

    T1(a,0)

    T2(0, b)

    T4(0, -b)

    T3(-a,0)

    TC(xTC, yTC)

    fCOI [Hz]51

    dfCOI/dt[Hz/s]

    0.6

    1.8

    -0.6

    -1.8

    494745

    STEADY

    STATE

    STEADY STATE AFTER

    PRIMARY FREQUENCY

    CONTROL ACTIVATION

    PERMANENT

    DROOP

    MAXIMAL (INITIAL)

    FREQUENCY FTD

    THE LOWEST VALUE,

    ACHIEVED BY THE

    FREQUENCY

    a b

    a)

    b)

  • 7/27/2019 Potential Underfrequency Load Shedding Schemes for the Slovenian Power System

    11/12

    Test results

    IEEE 9 bus test system

    10.0

    16.0

    25.025.0 25.0

    40.0

    40.0 40.0

    46.0

    55.055.0 55.0

    5.5

    11.8

    19.5

    24.2

    30.3

    36.0

    42.7

    47.0

    6.4

    15.9

    25.8

    29.9

    36.6

    41.2

    47.353.3

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

    Totalloadsheddingamount[%]

    Active power deficit [%]

    Traditional UFLS scheme

    Theoretically optimal UFLS scheme

    Predictive UFLS scheme (2)

    Predictive UFLS scheme (1)

    C l i

  • 7/27/2019 Potential Underfrequency Load Shedding Schemes for the Slovenian Power System

    12/12

    Conclusions

    A lot of space available for improvement

    Advance in computer and communicationtechnology

    Typical adaptive schemes NO!

    Predictive adaptive schemes

    ACTUALPOSSIBILITY!

    COI calculation unavoidable