Poster 2016_CAMP
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
angshuman-pal -
Category
Documents
-
view
91 -
download
22
Transcript of Poster 2016_CAMP
![Page 1: Poster 2016_CAMP](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022102510/589c35a31a28abec478b4d85/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
References: 1. A. Pal, P. Khajornrungruang, and S. V. Babu RSC Adv. 5 (2015) 71830 ; 2. A. Pal, P. Khajornrungruang, C. Netzband, S. Alety, S. V. Babu Nanotechnology 27 (2016) 075708
Key findingso In situ real time imaging of nano/micro structures
o Visualized in situ the growth of Ag ribbons
o No tedious sample preparation like TEM and SEM is needed
Instrument setup
o Evanescent wave (EW) scattering imaging method using a total internal
reflection technique to image and characterize the growth of silver ribbons
in situ in solution is described.
o Visualized in real time of the products of galvanic displacement between
Cu/Ag+ and Ag/Au3+ systems.
o This technique can also be used to characterize/analyze other nano/micro
structures in real time.
Abstract
REAL TIME IMAGING BY EVANESCENT WAVE SCATTERINGAngshuman Pal,1 Ramtej Popuri,1 Panart Khajornrungruang,2 and S.V. Babu1
1. Center for Advanced Materials Processing, Clarkson University, Potsdam USA; 2. Kyushu Institute of Technology, Japan
Ag nanowires with Au3+ ions
Ag ribbons with Au3+ ions
Cu nanowires with Ag+ ions
Galvanic displacement reactions
Cu nanoparticles with Ag+ ions
Time-sequenced EW images of Ag ribbons with Au3+ ions SEM images
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Particle size (nm)
Gre
y V
alue
30 nm
60 nm
110 nm
Scattering intensity vs particle size
Growth of Ag ribbons with Ag+ concentration
Ag+
(M)Induction time (s)
Growth rate (μm/s)
0.2 7±2 ~2.80.1 12±2 ~1.20.05 17±3 ~0.8
(a) -(d) sequential images (40 s intervals); Ag (0.01M)
EW images Ag ribbon formation SEM images
1 μm
EW and SEM images of the formation of different microstructures
(a-d : 0.2M; e-g : 0.1M; i-l : 0.05M)
HAuCl 4
Cu nanowires
Ag ribbons
Ag ribbons
Au or Au-Agnaoparticles
(See references)
1
2
3
4
o
o
0 50 100 150 2000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Penetration depth (nm)
Inte
nsity
(I/I₀
)
Penetration depth of EW
Pene
tratio
n de
pth
of E
W