Post-retirement income planning - CPDtvPost-retirement income planning Ferdi Booysen Old Mutual...
Transcript of Post-retirement income planning - CPDtvPost-retirement income planning Ferdi Booysen Old Mutual...
Post-retirement income planning
Ferdi Booysen
Old Mutual Wealth
June 2013
• The current income advice framework
• Income options for clients
• Living annuities unpacked
2
AGENDA
• Plan for higher inflation
• Plan for lower investment returns
• Plan for clients to live longer
The current income advice framework
3
• Plan for higher inflation
• Plan for lower investment returns
• Plan for clients to live longer
The current income advice framework
4
Inflation eroding clients’ income
5
An SA fast food example
• 1972: A wimpy chips & colddrink
= 47c
• 2012: Same meal = R50.50
• Will investing in cash over 40
years still buy a Wimpy meal?
• Saving 47c in cash over 40
years = R23.00
6
Guaranteed annuity outcomes
7
z
• Plan for higher inflation
• Plan for lower investment returns
• Plan for clients to live longer
The current income advice framework
8
9
Think long term and take risk..
50 years (1960 - 2010)
Shares 20.0%
Bonds 11.0%
Cash 11.0%
Weighted Average 16.5%
Inflation 8.5%
Real Return 8.0%
Realistic Returns: ± 9% - 11% p.a
If inflation averages 6% = real returns ± 3% - 5% p.a.
6.8%
6.0%
4.6%
3.5%
2.4%
AGGRESSIVE
BALANCED
DEFENSIVE
CONSERVATIVE
INCOME
SA Equities Offshore Equity Listed Property
SA Bonds Offshore Bonds SA Cash
… low RISK = low Return EXPECTED
REAL RETURNS
Source: MacroSolutions 10
Expectations for retirement income
Half want more than
70% replacement
income
11
Your client’s starting income
12
The current income advice framework
• Plan for higher inflation
• Plan for lower investment returns
• Plan for clients to live longer
13
Longevity expectations
14
A planned retirement?
15
If we knew it would simplify income advice significantly!
• for an average 60 year old Male, life expectancy currently is
approximately 25 years
• for an average 60 year old Female, life expectancy currently is
approximately 30 years
• for an average couple age 60 years, life expectancy currently is
approximately, 35 years
Based on PA(90) mortality tables, assuming that they reflect mortality
rates in 1990 and then assuming 2.5% improvement in mortality rates
thereafter.
How long will your clients live?
16
ASSUMING that we’re using a sustainable drawdown on the living
annuity to compare.
“Individuals cannot self-insure to protect from this longevity risk, and
without annuitization they are obliged to plan for a long lifespan
… because of mortality credits and the ability of the annuity provider to
make payouts based on life expectancy rather than maximum
lifespan.”
Deciphering the Annuity Puzzle
Practical Guidance for Advisors
By Wade Pfau
July 24, 2012
Living annuity implications
17
18
AGENDA
• The current income advice framework
• Income options for clients
• Living annuities unpacked
19
Living Annuities (LA)
Strengths
• Income flexibility
• Transparency
• Investment choice
• Bequest Motive
Weakness
• Income not Guaranteed
• Investment Market Risks
• No Longevity Protection
• Behavior Gap
• Conservative portfolios
Opportunities
• Guaranteed Funds in LA
• Composite Annuities
• Hybrid Annuities
Threats
• Legislation
• Decreasing Expectations of
Real Returns on Growth Assets
• Improving Life Expectancies
Strengths
• Income Guaranteed for Life
• Investment Market Risk
• No Longevity Risk
20
Guaranteed Annuities (GA)
Weakness
• Generally no upside market
potential (except for with-profit)
• Death Benefits Limited
(Joint Life, Guaranteed Term,
CPO)
Opportunities
• With-Profit/Bonus Escalation
Option provides exposure to
upside of investment markets
with no downside risks
• Composite Annuities
Threats
• Living Annuities
– Multiple advice points
– Initial and ongoing Advice Fees
on LA but only Initial Advice
Fees on GA
• Improving Life Expectancies
• Clients who
– have reason to believe that their life expectancy will be short due to
poor health or immediate family history.
– want to be able to alter the income that they draw annually.
– are prepared to take the risk that poor market performance will
negatively impact on future income from their investment.
– Want any remaining fund benefits going to their beneficiaries on death.
– are prepared to take the risk that their retirement capital may reduce,
and therefore their income may be insufficient, especially if they draw
too much income early on.
– wish to have the ability to change the investments funds they hold.
21
Who should purchase Living Annuities?
Emotions at play
• CONTROL
– It’s my money
• POTENTIAL
– The market will perform
• RICH
– I love to look at my balance
• LIFE EXPECTANCY
– I’ll never get to 90
• TRUST
– I can manage my money
What do clients say?
22
• Clients who
– want a guaranteed income as long as they and/or their partner are alive.
– want their income to be guaranteed against any market movements.
– want to maximise the income available to them and/or their partner rather
than leave money to other beneficiaries on death.
– are prepared to sacrifice their capital in exchange for a stream of
payments, where the value they receive depends on their and/or their
partners lifespan and current bond yields
– do not wish to take risks with their retirement income.
23
Who should purchase Guaranteed Annuities?
• Composite annuity
– Combination of Living and Guaranteed Annuity in one contract
• Hybrid annuity
– Living Annuities that convert to guaranteed annuities on pre-defined
terms when Living Annuity assets run out
• Deferred annuitisation
– Living annuity is converted to a guaranteed annuity once
acceptable/improved guaranteed rates are available
24
What other options do clients have?
• The current income advice framework
• Income options for clients
• Living annuities unpacked
– What factors influence your client’s drawdown rate?
– What is an ideal LA drawdown rate?
– How can I manage LA income volatility?
– How long should I plan for the LA income to last?
25
AGENDA
• How much do you really need to live on?
– Drawing as little as you can manage initially improves the chance of
providing you with a sustainable income in future.
– Budget and see what you really need in order to live on next year.
• How much can your investment sustain?
– If the income you draw, plus ongoing charges, is greater than the growth
on your investment, your capital will diminish.
What factors influence the drawdown?
26
What is an ideal LA drawdown rate?
Source: Old Mutual Retirement Income Safety Plan
55 60 65 70 75
Male 4.00% 4.50% 5.00% 5.50% 6.00%
Female 3.50% 4.00% 4.50% 5.00% 5.50%
Couple 3.25% 3.75% 4.25% 4.75% 5.25%
27
• Growth assets are required to ensure that:
– retirement capital is not eroded, AND
– income is protected against inflation
• Low volatility is preferred to minimise the risk of drawing an
income from a depressed fund value
• Can I achieve this in a single fund?
How can I manage LA income volatility?
28
Growth assets usually mean volatility. Sequence of returns is unpredictable!
29
Growth assets usually mean volatility. Volatility impairs income sustainability!
30
Impact of volatility and sequence of returns
31
Absolute Smoothed Growth Fund
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Old Mutual Absolute Growth (Smoothing Only)**
Typical Balanced Fund*
* Source: Alexander Forbes Large Manager Watch.
** Back-tested pre April 2007
32
Historical Analysis Results (40 years to August 2011)
Smoothing Strategy outperformed on every measure
• At least as good as the most aggressive in growth and
• far better than the most conservative in protection
• “efficiency” statistics extremely compelling
Objective | Inv Strategy Aggressive Moderate Conservative Smoothed Agg
1: Long term growth 95.68% 77.74% 52.49% 100.00%
2 a): Real return >4% over rolling 5 years 80.76% 77.20% 58.67% 86.70%
b): Real return >4% over rolling 3 years 67.87% 64.94% 54.83% 79.78%
c): Real return >0% over rolling 1 year 67.16% 67.80% 68.44% 79.74%
3 a): Non-negative annual returns 87.85% 90.62% 96.16% 99.15%
b): Non-negative monthly returns 64.17% 69.79% 72.50% 99.58%
c): expected size of negative returns -8.97% -4.43% -2.33% -0.72%
Absolute Smoothed Growth Fund
33
• Full living annuity income flexibility and investment features
• Investment and drawdown experience affects timing and level of move to the Guaranteed Annuity phase
Living annuity
• “Rescue” is only triggered if living annuity income is too high relative to Safety Level
• Safe Income then kicks in for life
Guaranteed annuity
How long should I plan for the LA income to last?
34
55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
Male 5.50% 6.50% 7.50% 8.50% 9.50% 10.50% 12.00% 14.50% 17.50%
Female 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00% 11.50% 14.00% 17.50%
Joint 4.75% 5.75% 6.75% 7.75% 8.75% 9.75% 11.25% 13.75% 17.50%
SAFETY PLAN
SAFETY
Male 4.00% 4.50% 5.00% 5.50% 6.00%
Female 3.50% 4.00% 4.50% 5.00% 5.50%
Couple 3.25% 3.75% 4.25% 4.75% 5.25%
Threshold levels –
used to reward ongoing
drawdown behaviour
Safe Income –
used to set the initial
Safe Income guaranteed
level
• Plan for higher inflation, lower investment returns and clients to live
longer!
• Living Annuities, Guaranteed Annuities, Composite Annuities and
Hybrid Annuities all have a place in the post-retirement environment
and meet different client needs.
• Client needs are often conflicting and it is not easy for one specific
solution to meet all the client’s needs and therefore trade-offs need
to be made.
• There seems to be a significant under-utilisation of Composite and
Hybrid Annuities.
Summary
36
37
Mickey Gambale
June 2013
Momentum Wealth
Happy living – which is
the right annuity for me?
Contents
Presentation Disclaimer
The calculations used in this presentation are for illustrative purposes only. The
information used for these calculations is based on assumptions utilised to further
the understanding of the calculations. This is not the official position or opinion of
Momentum and its employees. Momentum will accept no responsibility whatsoever
for any loss caused by negligence or otherwise, including without limitation any
direct, indirect, punitive or consequential loss resulting from the use of this
information or the calculations.
Contents
• Regulatory / industry developments: “in search of a sustainable
annuity”
• Are pensioners coping with realities?
• Guiding factors to consider
• Is any annuity going to pay you enough?
Contents
Regulatory / industry developments: “In search of a
sustainable annuity”
National treasury and retirement reform
Treasury released a number of overview discussion documents in
where they outlined the following high-level considerations:
• Costs of retirement funds and related vehicles
• The costs and risks for post-retirement income vehicles
• Preservation, portability and uniform access to retirement savings
• Savings and fiscal incentives – possible alternatives to encourage
savings
• Harmonisation of tax treatment of contributions
National treasury and retirement reform
• Reform proposals aim to extend the responsibilities of trustees to guide members through the retirement process,
• Requiring them to make a default retirement product available
• Default could be a guaranteed, living or hybrid annuity
• Option to opt out of the default with their entire retirement balance
• Trustees will be given some protection in respect of the default
• An FSB directive is expected outlining the minimum requirements that Trustees must meet.
• The final round of consultation is intended to be completed towards the middle of the year, with the first changes expected to be implemented from 2015 and forward.
ASSA Convention 2012: In search of a sustainable
retirement income
Source: Lodhia & Swanepoel 2012: Living versus Guaranteed annuities: In search of a sustainable retirement income
GAs better equipped than LAs to provide an inflation linked income for life, because:
1. Impact of mortality pooling and the drawdown cap:
Industry conclusions
Are living
annuities
appropriate
products?
• The financial adviser will assist clients in making
suitable investment decisions
• “Accused of mis-selling living annuities to reap
commissions” – from Actuarial Society Convention
• “Where was this research when we were being told to sell
living annuities by the product houses?”
Financial advisers
The Media’s
interpretation
• “Headlong plunge by 85% of retirees into living annuities at
retirement could be creating a generation of impoverished
pensioners”
• Living annuity 'not your best first choice' - Personal Finance
Retirement
Are pensioners coping with realities?
Poor decision
making
Is it possible that
some clients and
their financial
advisers do not
understand the risks
embedded in LAs?
Shady Pines
retirement village
Most presented with a
retirement based on
conventional life
annuity face a grim
retirement from day
one
Why so many taxpayers moved over to LAs and
then failed?
Changing economic
and investment
cycles
We live in a different
world with interest
rates < half those
20 years ago
Medical costs
just one major setback
in a family is enough to
severely dent most
retirement plans
Increased energy
prices
Only a Ponzi Scheme
has any prospects of
yielding an after-tax
return that can keep
pace with today’s
Eskom increases
KIPPERS
Kids in Parents’ Pockets
Eroding Retirement
Savings. Many LAs
overdrawn to support
family rather than
pensioners
Why should I trust
insurance companies
Why should I work for 40
years to give my money
away?
*Sunday Times: Money & careers by Matthew Lester
Guiding factors to consider
Is it fair to compare a life and a living annuity?
If you’re comparing life annuities to other investment products
such as a living annuities, you’re making a classic mistake!
Mistake 1: focusing on returns
• The market sells returns - people misunderstand life annuities because
financial experts and the media have focused on saving for
retirement and, to a large extent, investment returns and “return
management,” rather than risk management and, specifically, the
risk of outliving one’s assets.
• Allowing prevailing interest rates to be a deal-breaker. It’s true that
lower interest rates can mean a lower pay out, but the reason to buy an
annuity is because you want the absolute insurance of having that
income in your bank account every month for life.
Mistake 2: failing to annuitize
• Perhaps the biggest mistake is simply failing to annuitize assets to
create a guaranteed stream of retirement income.....
• A focus on historical returns may make life annuities seem like a bad
deal. But that may change going forward
• The last decade showed us that though it was fairly easy take money
from a portfolio and have that portfolio survive for a long time this
may not be the case going forward
Mistake 3: unfair comparisons - costs
• Assess the value of a annuity as though all of its costs are nothing but pure overhead is wrong
• Life annuities costs include charges for the transfer of risk. Living annuities costs are ongoing risk and portfolio management
• Any insurance product on the planet will not pay off on average. That’s something IFA’s need to recognize when we analyse risk-management strategies
• Insurance costs shouldn’t be ignored neither should investment costs. They might be too high or too low. But insurance shouldn’t be compared to investment products
Living vs.. Life annuities, should they be compared
Living annuities
• Provides for an income linked to investment portfolio
• Flexible drawdown range 2.5% - 17.5%
• The flexibility of the offering enables you to enjoy the potential
growth if the market performs
• It is an investment and not an insurance product
Living vs.. Life annuities, should they be compared
Life annuities
• Pass on all the risk to life companies
• The benefits of pooling works in
your favour, but equally so against
• You should have saved enough to
get a good starting income
• Life annuities are a insurance and
not a investment product
You have sufficient capital at retirement and
you want flexibility
You want to benefit from the mortality
benefits offered by risk pooling
You have access to skilled, trusted and
independent financial advice
You require a known guaranteed annuity
with no investment risk during retirement
You want to leave a financial inheritance when
you die
You don’t want to run the risk of out living
your income for the rest of your life
You would like to be involved in decision
making during retirement
You have a life expectancy < 15 years
Consider a Living
Annuity if
Consider Guaranteed
Annuity if
You are not married and / or you don’t care
what happens to your money when you die
You have a life expectancy > 15 years
Is any annuity going to pay you enough?
It depends on how much you’ve
saved. A life annuity isn’t a
solution for saving too little,
though it does protect you against
running out of money
Looking back on reality
Corporate John
• Current salary at retirement R500k
• Discount rate of 6%
• Investment growth of 9% pa after fees (no tax)
• Retires at age 65, wife 60
• Worked for 40 years
• Purchases joint life CPI linked annuity with 33% reduction on
first death
Looking back on reality
Corporate John example:
Pre retirement post retirement reality post retirement perfect
preservation post retirement 75% net post retirement 75%
gross
CTC / Salary 500 000 116 569 194 449 265 850 375 000
Pension 62 500 - - - -
Tax 86 000 3 152 19 582 38 225 72 420
Medical 48 000 48 000 48 000 48 000 48 000
Deductions (tax, medical, etc.) 196 500 51 152 67 582 86 225 120 420
Net 303 500 65 417 126 866 179 625 254 580
Net salary pm 25 292 5 451 10 572 14 969 18 154
Expenses 25 000 14 000 14 000 14 000 14 000
Bond 8 000 - - - -
Car 3 000 - - - -
Insurance 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 500
Travel 2 000 2 000 2 000 2 000 2 000
Food 5 000 5 000 5 000 5 000 5 000
Municipal 2 000 2 000 2 000 2 000 2 000
Clothes 1 000 1 000 1 000 1 000 1 000
Communication 500 500 500 500 500
Entertainment 2 000 2 000 2 000 2 000 2 000
Surplus / deficit 292 -8 549 -3 428 969 4 154
Total pension at retirement 2 567 116 4 278 526 5 847 384 8 245 821
% of original 60% 100% 137% 321%
Monthly % saved to achieve lump sum 12.50% 17.50% 24.00%
Pensioners look back
R -
R 1 000.00
R 2 000.00
R 3 000.00
R 4 000.00
R 5 000.00
R 6 000.00
R 7 000.00
R 8 000.00
R 9 000.00
R 10 000.00
R 11 000.00
R 12 000.00
R 13 000.00
R 14 000.00
R -
R 500 000.00
R 1000 000.00
R 1500 000.00
R 2000 000.00
R 2500 000.00
July
, 20
02
Dec
emb
er, 2
00
2
May
, 200
3
Oct
ob
er, 2
003
Mar
ch, 2
004
Au
gust
, 20
04
Jan
uar
y, 2
005
Jun
e, 2
00
5
No
vem
ber
, 200
5
Ap
ril,
20
06
Sep
tem
ber
, 20
06
Feb
ruar
y, 2
007
July
, 20
07
Dec
emb
er, 2
007
May
, 200
8
Oct
ob
er, 2
008
Mar
ch, 2
00
9
Au
gust
, 20
09
Jan
uar
y, 2
010
Jun
e, 2
01
0
No
vem
ber
, 201
0
Ap
ril,
20
11
Sep
tem
ber
, 20
11
Feb
ruar
y, 2
012
July
, 20
12
Amount - Portfolio Amount - Inflation Monthly annuity
Where to from here?
• Educate market to gain a better understanding of trade-offs between LA and GA both by client and IFA
• Retirees need to better understand the impact drawing down too much income
• Requirement for higher equity exposure and associated volatility if they opt for a living annuity
• How do we continuously support / monitor to ensure sufficient income in retirement?
• Engagement with requlators
• Collaborate across product houses and industry players to create innovative products and support one another
“Human behavior flows from three
main sources: desire, emotion,
and knowledge. ” – Plato 424-348 BC
As the people in the know our purpose should be to create
responsible solutions for stress-free living and a comfortable
retirement for all our clients
Thank you