Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University...

49
Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011

Transcript of Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University...

Page 1: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Post-KeynesianEconomics - II

D. Allen DaltonECON 325 – Radical Economics

Boise State UniversityFall 2011

Page 2: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Post-KeynesianGrowth Economics

Page 3: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Solow Growth Model

• The basic neoclassical growth model was developed by Robert Solow in 1956, extending a model developed earlier by Roy Harrod (1939) and Evsey Domar (1946) - the Harrod-Domar Model.– “A Contribution to the Theory of

Economic Growth,” QJE, 70 (1):65-94.

Page 4: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Solow Growth Model• Five basic equations

– Macro production function• Y/L = F (K/L) with diminishing returns to K

and L– GDP equation

• Y = C + I + G + NX– Savings function

• I = sY; s is the marginal propensity to save out of income

– Change in Capital equation• ∆K = sY – dK; d is the rate of depreciation

– Change in Workforce equation• Lt+1 = Lt(1 +gL); g is the growth rate of labor

Page 5: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Solow Model Graphical Presentation

• y = f(k); where y = Y/L, k = K/L• n = labor force growth rate• δ = depreciation• k = capital per worker (K/L)• y = output (income) per worker (Y/L)• L = labor force• s = saving rate• k is determined by three variables

– Investment (saving) per worker– Population growth (increasing population

reduces k)– Depreciation (K declines as it depreciates)

Page 6: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Solow Model Graphical Presentation

• Production function showing diminishing returns to K

• Saving function

• Capital function

Page 7: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Solow Model Graphical Presentation

• When the savings rate (sy) is greater than the sum of the labor force growth rate and the depreciation rate [(n+d)k], then capital per worker is increasing; output per worker is increasing.

Page 8: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Solow Model Graphical Presentation

• When sy < (n+d)k, then capital per worker is decreasing; output per worker is decreasing.

Page 9: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Solow Model Graphical Presentation

• When sy = (n+d)k, then capital per worker is constant, output per worker is constant, and output is growing at the rate of n (labor force growth rate).

Page 10: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Effects of Changes in Saving• Suppose that

savings rate increases (shift of saving function from sy to s1y.

• Saving now exceeds labor force growth and depreciation.

• Capital accumulation occurs; k grows.

• Output per worker grows.

Page 11: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Effects of Changes in Saving• The economy

initially has a higher growth rate but ultimately returns to the steady-state growth rate (n+d) but capital per worker and output per worker is permanently higher.

Page 12: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Kaldor-Robinson Growth Model

• The basic Post-Keynesian growth model was developed independently by Nicholas Kaldor and Joan Robinson in the 1950s, especially their respective 1956 writings.– Kaldor

• "The Relation of Economic Growth and Cyclical Fluctuations", 1954 EJ

• "Alternative Theories of Distribution", 1956, RES • "A Model of Economic Growth", 1957, EJ .

– Robinson, The Accumulation of Capital, 1956.

Page 13: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Kaldor-Robinson Growth Model

•Classical division of world into capitalists and workers, earning profits and wages.

•Capitalists control rate of investment; workers control rate of consumption.

•Y = W + P = C + I•S = swY + (sp-sw)P• I = swY + (sp-sw)P

Page 14: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Kaldor-Robinson Growth Model

• I = swY + (sp-sw)P• I/Y = swY/Y + (sp-sw)P/Y• P/Y = [1/(sp-sw)][I/Y] – [sw/(sp-sw)]• Classical assumptions

– sw = 0 and sp = 1

• P/Y = I/Y– The greater the rate of investment and

therefore economic growth, the greater the share of the national income going to capitalists!

Page 15: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Kaldor-Robinson Growth Model

•Relax Classical assumptions– sw = 0 and sp < 1 (so some income

from profits spent on C)

•P/Y = (1/sp)(I/Y)– The profit share of national income

for a given ratio of investment to output will be higher the smaller is the marginal propensity to save out of profit income!

Page 16: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Post-KeynesianMicroeconomics

Page 17: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Individual ChoiceSeven Principles of Consumer

Choice(1) Consumers follow habits & rules; they

satisfice rather than maximize.(2) Beyond a threshold, once a need is met,

additional units of good bring no additional satisfaction.

• Exists at a positive price and finite income.

(3) Consumers divide expenditures into categories and subcategories.

• Changes in relative prices only affect choices within a subgroup; all prices within a subgroup must change to affect choices outside the subgroup.

Page 18: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Individual ChoiceSeven Principles of Consumer

Choice(4) Needs are hierarchically ranked.

• Essential needs financed first; then if discretionary income remains, it is allocated to other subgroups by priority. Not all goods can be substituted for others.

(5) Time and increases in income allow movement from one need to another on the hierarchy of needs.

• People make way up their pyramid as their income grows.

(6) Needs are non-independent.(7) Past choices influence current choices.

Page 19: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Characteristics of Firms• Imperfectly competitive markets

the rule; firms are price-setters.• Firm decision-making is

interdependent; strategy is essential behavioral attribute.

• Divorce of ownership and control means other goals (market share, firm survival) take precedence over profit-maximization.

Page 20: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Costs of Production

• Input ratios are technologically fixed within a production process.– Very little substitution between

inputs– Fixed technical coefficients

•Practical capacity is engineer-rated

Page 21: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Costs of Production• The unit direct costs (≈AVC) and

marginal costs of a plant are approximately constant up to practical capacity.

• Unit cost (≈ATC) is generally decreasing until practical capacity is reached

• Production beyond practical capacity entails rapidly increasing marginal costs

• Cost curves do not include opportunity costs

Page 22: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Costs of Production• Firms usually

operate with excess capacity (average costs are constant).

• Excess capacity plays a role for firms similar to the role liquidity plays for households - flexibility.

• Firms have other sources of flexibility – e.g., inventories and overtime.

Page 23: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Price-Setting• All Post-Keynesian price-setting models

are versions of cost-plus pricing.• Mark-up pricing

– Prices depend on UDC. A gross-costing margin is added (covering overhead costs and desired profits) to arrive at price.

• Normal-cost pricing– Takes advantage of accounting practices to

assign a part of general costs to each manufactured product.

– Firms calculate a normal unit cost (includes both direct and attributed overhead costs) at the normal level of production, to which they add a net costing margin covering profits. The normal unit cost is independent of demand.

Page 24: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Price-Setting• Under cost-plus pricing, changes in

demand lead neither to an increase in unit costs nor to an increase in prices.

• Inventories buffer the changes in demand, rather than prices.

• Cost-plus pricing reflects behavior of leading firms in the industry; other firms must decide whether to follow.

• What ultimately determines the size of the costing margin?

Page 25: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Price-Setting• What ultimately determines the size of the

costing margin?– The target rate of return.

• What determines the target rate of return?– What determines the normal profit rate?– Following the growth models of Kaldor and

Robinson, what determines the macroeconomic profit rate is the macroeconomic growth rate!

– Sraffian’s argue that the normal profit rate depends upon the rate of interest.

– Marxian-influenced Post-Keynesians argue the normal profit rate is determined by class struggle and (Kaleckians) the degree of monopoly power.

Page 26: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Post-KeynesianMacroeconomics

Page 27: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Monetary Theory• Endogenous Money

– Supply of money determined by the demand for bank credit and the public’s preferences.

– Creation of loans and hence deposits is ex nihilo – without previous reserves - all that is needed is a credible borrower.

– Banks obtain cash and required reserves from the central bank as a consequence of loan-creation.

Page 28: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Monetary Theory

All money(reserves, currency,

deposits)

is endogenousand demand-determined!

Page 29: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Monetary Theory• All interest rates are tied to the

“benchmark rate” that is administered by the central bank.

• The rate chosen by the central bank is described by a reaction function, specifying the policy goals the central bank has.– e.g., raise interest rates when the

inflation is rising, unemployment falling, capacity utilization is high.

Page 30: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Monetary Theory• At any given point

in time, the supply of money is perfectly elastic at the benchmark rate.

• The demand for money is determined by the loan rate of interest, the growth rate of output, the growth rate of prices and the rate of investment.

i

High-powered Money

St2

St1

St0

D

R

Page 31: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Financial Instability Hypothesis

• Focus on “capital development of economy” rather than “allocation of resources”

• Capital development is accompanied by exchanges of present money for future money– “Present money” pays for resources into

production of investment output; “Future money” is the profits accruing to capital-asset owning firms

– Control over capital stock is financed by liabilities

Page 32: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Financial Instability Hypothesis

• Liability Structures: the balance sheet of firms determine a time-series of payment commitments and time-series of conjectured cash receipts– Money flows are from depositors to banks to

firms, and then from firms to banks to depositors

– Flow of money to firms is response to expected future profits; Flow of money from firms is result of realized profits

• Consumers, governments and international agents also have liability structures

Page 33: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Financial Instability Hypothesis

• The key determinant of system behavior is the level of profits

• FIH incorporates the Kaleckian view of profits – structure of AD determines profits– Simplest model, the aggregate level of

profits equals the aggregate level of investment each period (P/Y = I/Y).

• FIH is a theory of the impact of debt on system behavior.

Page 34: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Financial Instability Hypothesis

• Banks are innovative profit-seekers– Seek to innovate new profitable assets

they acquire and liabilities they market• Three distinct income-debt relations

for economic agents– Hedge-financing– Speculative -financing– Ponzi-financing

Page 35: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Financial Instability Hypothesis

• Hedge finance: agents which can fulfill all of their payment obligations from cash flows

• Speculative finance: agents which can fulfill their payment obligations from their income account, even though cash flow can not repay principle on contractual debt (such units must “roll over” debt)

Page 36: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Financial Instability Hypothesis

• Ponzi finance: cash flows are not sufficient to fulfill either repayment of principle or interest due on outstanding debt; such agents must either sell assets or increase borrowing– Borrowing or selling assets lowers the

equity of these agents

Page 37: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Financial Instability Hypothesis

• First Theorem– “The economy has financing regimes

under which it is stable, and financing regimes under which it is unstable.”

If hedge-financing dominates, the economy is an equilibrium-seeking and containing system. The greater the weight of speculative and Ponzi financing, the greater the likelihood the economy is a deviation-amplifying system.

Source: Hyman Minsky, “The Financial Instability Hypothesis”, Handbook of Radical Political Economy, 1993.

Page 38: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Financial Instability Hypothesis

• Second Theorem– “Over periods of prolonged prosperity,

the economy transits from financial relations that make for a stable system to financial relations that make for an unstable system.”

If an unstable economy occurs during a period of inflation, an attempt to reduce inflation via monetary constraint will push speculative units into Ponzi units and Ponzi units will see their asset values collapse.

Source: Hyman Minsky, “The Financial Instability Hypothesis”, Handbook of Radical Political Economy, 1993.

Page 39: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

FIH: The Central Question

Why does speculative and Ponzi financing

become more prevalent in times of prolonged prosperity?

Page 40: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Monetary Circuit Theory• Monetary Circuit Theory

• Two matrices; balance-sheet matrix and a transactions-flow matrix.

• Balance sheets deal with stocks• Each stock associated with a given flow

– Simple Model• Banks do not make profits• Households don’t borrow• Firms don’t hold money balances• Flows must balance• Positive signs represent sources of funds,

negative signs represent use of funds

Page 41: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Monetary Circuit Theory

Source: Marc Lavoie, Introduction to Post-Keynesian Economics, p. 77.

Page 42: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Monetary Circuit Theory• Monetary Circuit Theory

– Firms borrow funds needed to pay wages to households

– When wages are paid, they become income for households

– When received as income, before consumption, these funds become savings

– Savings become a deposit for banks in their capital account

– As income is consumed, it becomes a source of funds for firms

– Any unsold product become inventories

Page 43: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Aggregate Demand Theory• Keynes’ General Theory

– Kaleckian alternative• Aggregate Supply Function

– Relationship of firms’ expected sales receipts to level of employment hired

• Aggregate Demand Function– Relationship of households’ expected

purchases to level of employment• Interaction produces Macreconomic

equilibrium

Page 44: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Aggregate Supply and Demand

• Keynes viewed Say’s Law as requiring a coincidence between the Z and D functions

Source: Paul Davidson, “Reviving Keynes’ Revolution,” Why Economists Disagree, p. 70.

Page 45: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Keynes and Say’s Law• Whether Keynes accurately portrayed

Say’s Law has been a subject of a prolonged and ongoing debate.

• Leijonhufvud argues that what Say had in mind was a “constraint on reasoning,” and that therefore Say’s Law is really a relationship between plans and not the fruition of plans.

We won’t enter into that debate here (take my Macroeconomics class in the spring if you want to understand the debate and its importance).

Page 46: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Aggregate Supply and Demand

• Keynes argued that involuntary unemployment is due to a lack of effective demand (Given D at D’, equilibrium sales are E and employment is N1 rather than full employment Nf

Source: Paul Davidson, “Reviving Keynes’ Revolution,” Why Economists Disagree, p. 70.

Page 47: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Aggregate Demand Theory• The primary determinant of the level of

effective demand is investment, which does not require saving.

• Rather investment only depends upon the willingness to borrow (tied to expected sales) and the willingness to lend (tied to expected sales).

• Thus the importance of consumer demand in molding the expectations of firms and banks to enter into loan contracts to finance investment.

Page 48: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Post-KeynesianPolitical Economy

Page 49: Post-Keynesian Economics - II D. Allen Dalton ECON 325 – Radical Economics Boise State University Fall 2011.

Normative Criteria and Policy Espousal

•Success at full employment and fair distribution of income rather than success at allocating resources

•Government Management•Price and income policies can do

good•Socialist to corporate liberalism