Post harvest technology revival by Henry Boerrigter
Transcript of Post harvest technology revival by Henry Boerrigter
FBR’s position in the innovation funnel
Applied Research
assessm
en
t
Demonstration Implementation
assesm
en
t
as
se
sm
en
t
Fundamental
research
bu
sin
ess i
mp
act
Knowledge Push
Market Pull
Wageningen University
FBR: a CRO Industry
ConsultancyTraining
Pilots
Food & Postharvest science for impact!!!
In 7 area’s of expertise
Post-harvest technology
Supply chain management
Food quality & analysis
Sustainable process technology
Biorefinery
Food design & structuring
Consumer science
Intelligent systems
Focus on practical results
FBR serving fresh food supply chains
Retail is the major outlet for fresh food in EU
● EU/USA: 90%
● Egypt: 3-5%
● Export to EU retail!
Retailers need large volumes
● Buying power -> comply with rigid specs
● High quality = Consistent quality
● Seasonal shift, global sourcing
● Safety: not negotiable (MRL!!!)
Global sourcing put quality at risk
Storage & transport time longer
Shelf life guarantees
No PHL and PH waste: impact food security
Fresh produce losses: 35% on average
Distributio
n
consume
r
Developing
countries
21% 12%
Developed
countries
11% 23%
Only minor set of Egyptian data available
?????50% tomatoes ???????
Top-10 reported causes PHL in F&V Supply Chains
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Sto
rage
faci
liti
es
Co
ldch
ain
s /
tran
spo
rt c
limat
e c
on
tro
l
Pro
du
ct h
and
ling
/ gr
adin
g /
sizi
ng
Pac
kagi
ng
Infr
astr
uct
ure
qu
alit
y /
con
nec
tivi
ty
Mar
ket
info
/
pri
cin
g
Pro
cess
nig
cap
acit
y
Edu
cati
on
/ R
&D
Inve
stm
en
t / c
red
it
acce
ss
qu
alit
y st
and
ard
s
nu
mb
er o
f re
fere
nce
s
cause category
Typical
FBR
knowledge
domains
FBR’s fresh chain solutions
Cold chain: monitoring: Q, T, RH
Storage (facilities): CA, ULO, mixed load
Transport: protocols for perishable handling
Pre-cooling systems & protective package: design
Quality control, bio-markers: Q-prediction
Ripening control: RTE on demand
The FBR smart chain concept
Initial Quality
Chain condition
Quality
developmentKnown
Quality
+
+=
From FIFO to FEFO
Characteristics PHT knowledge
Public Post-Harvest R&D capacity: not well developed
● Big companies: have own R&D, do not share
Academia: No drive towards industry: publication first!
● Poorly funded: not a rocket science, not sexy
Local institutes/uni’s do not fulfill PH business demands
● Focus on breeding/cropping/water/pests
Strenghten PHT knowledge base
Make PHT knowledge available
Use agrologistics forum or NoE
Case Egypt
Sustain this:
● Built up local PH-capacities in a regional PHIC’s
● Do PH-research & pilots with local products
● Improve skills: education/training/extension
● Showroom: novel technologies,
● Services: packing, processing, Q-inspection
Essential data example: vine tomatoes NL.
Temperature
Distribution
[days]8°C 10°C 12°C 18°C
9 ++ ++ + ---
11 ++ + + ---
14 + + --- / + ---
17 + --- / + --- ---
19--- /
+--- / + --- ---
PH Innovation Centers (PHIC) <-> FBR
FBR advice for the design (interior)
● Lessons already learned in NL.
● what works/what doesn’t
Hardware:
● Labs, analysers, scaled storage facilities
Software:
● Methods
● Effective research approach
● Procedures
How to make a PHIC effective?
Orgware: make the right research teams
● Expertise groups
Connect to agri-business (PPP)
● IP issues to be solved
● Practical pilots (chain approach)
Well defined multi-disciplinary research projects
● Aims, goals, methods, effects, deliverables
Kick start: make the PHIC mobile!!
A new PHIC = very long lead time before start
● Feasibility – organising - planning - fund raising –building
● Endurance
● Use in peak season only
Narrowing the time gap:
● Use a mobile FBR lab (ML)
● Designed by FBR
● Built by: ??
Strenghtening the knowledge base now
Tailor made interventions:
Train the trainer
On the spot, in company workshops
FBR’s post-harvest modules: 10-15
For regional workshops or in-company courses
- General & product-specific
- Ornamentals included
Conclusions
FBR post-harvest knowledge available for Egyptian initiatives
● Agro-logistic forum: member
● Pilots: ready to help
● Raising a PHIC
FBR PHT value chain approach:
● All inclusive
● Food processing
● Biorefinery
● Consumer preferences
● SCM