Post globalization, cultural power and international broadcasting

download Post globalization, cultural power and international broadcasting

of 10

  • date post

  • Category


  • view

  • download


Embed Size (px)

Transcript of Post globalization, cultural power and international broadcasting

PowerPoint Presentation

Holding slide for Centre events1

Post-Globalization, Cultural Power and International Broadcasting

Terry Flew, Professor of Media and Communication, Creative Industries Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

Title slide for presentations2

Political Economy v. Globalization theoriesIs the relationship between political-economic and cultural power a strong or weak one?Has power become more diffused internationally, or is Western hegemony paramount?Can dominant ideologies be reconciled with active/productive audiences?

Content slide for presentations3

The vexed question of power in media studiesPower has often been a term that is widely used but insufficiently explained.Des Freedman: four paradigms of media power:ConsensusChaosControlContradiction

Cultural studies debates: dominant or contested meanings?

Active audience debate in communication and cultural studiesThe field of Cultural Studies has perpetually oscillated between an emphasis on power in terms of the imposition of ideology through culture, on the one hand, and agency in terms of the relatively freedom of the consumer, on the other. (Gibson, 2007, p. 167)

International expansion of state broadcastingA key feature of global media since the 2000s has been the expansion of state broadcasting internationallyAlmost all major international news broadcasters are predominantly state-funded: CNN as major exceptionExpansion of international reach frequently justified in terms of cultural diplomacy, or soft power

Soft power debatesSoft power as the ability to get what you want through attraction rather than coercion or payments (Nye, 2004, p. x), and the associated ability to shape the preferences of others (Nye, 2004, p. 5).Term can become a synonym for anything other than military force (Nye, 2011, p. 81).What is specifically cultural about this power?How is culture being used in these definitions?

Culture and power internationallySoft power and cultural imperialism discourses bear a strong resemblance (Sparks, 2016)Cross-cultural communication studies as well as audience theories suggest that influence of imported cultural product can be overstatedDoes imported media content sit at the centre or margins of national media systems? (Tunstall, 2008)

The distribution fallacyCulture is understood as things/objects/events rather than as processesTransmission model of communciationevidence of reach is taken to be synonymous with influence e.g. claims that CCTV covers 98 per cent of the world ... with 45 million subscribers outside China(cited in Zhang, 2011)Distribution fallacy suggests that more will be spent on distributing content than assessing impact or influence

Cultural power and post-globalizationPolitical, economic and cultural power interconnected (critical political economy) or divergent (globalisation theories)How does cultural power intersect or not with political and economic power?How active are audiences in the shaping of cultural meaning?What implications do new media have new public diplomacy debatesContinuing power of nation-states in global context post-globalization