post assessment moderation report.docx
-
Upload
mwaseem2011 -
Category
Documents
-
view
231 -
download
0
Transcript of post assessment moderation report.docx
-
7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx
1/12
POST ASSESSMENT MODERATION REPORT
Demonstrate the knowledge of ALGEBRA using linear systems to solveproblems (5262)
Programme Name: WLCNZ Diploma in Electronics
Unit / Paper Number: 5262 Paper Name: Demonstrate the knowledge ofALGEBRA using linear systems to solve problems
Level: 3 Credits (1-20): 20
Assessor Name: Muhammad WaseemSoomro
Moderation Date: 04 09 2012 Name of Moderator: Saud Altaf
Quick Report Yes / No Comment
Assessment attached
Marking Schedule/Model Answer attached
Samples attached
Suggested answers match the questions
Marking is Fair
Marking is valid
Marking is accurate
Marking is consistent
The student scripts are authentic
Moderator Signature Date 04 09 2012
Student Samples Paper A:
Student Samples Paper B:
-
7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx
2/12
Student Samples Paper C:
REPORT IN DETAIL
The Post-Assessment Moderation is based on 5 measures. The moderator must check theassessment for its Fairness, Validity, Accuracy, Consistency, and Authenticity.
PART A: FAIR
QUESTIONS YES / NO
1. Does the assessment meet the unit standard / learning outcome requirements?(Honest reflection)
2. Is the assessment produced appropriate to the unit standard / learning outcome?
3. Did all students have a fair chance to succeed in doing the assessment?(Guidelines / timeframe)
4. Has the assessment been impartially marked?
Comments
PART B: VALID
QUESTIONS YES / NO
5. Is the assessment precisely relevant to the learning outcomes / performancecriterias.
6. Is the assessment task current to unit standard / paper and / or industry field?
7. Is the assessment marking reasonable and logical?
Comments
-
7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx
3/12
PART C: ACCURATE
QUESTIONS YES / NO
8. Is the assessment edited / professionally presented and concise? Spelling /punctuation / verbs and tasks?
9. Is the way the assessment is written accurately enough to assess?
Comments
PART D: CONSISTENT (RELIABLE)
QUESTIONS YES / NO
10. Is the assessment consistent across the student samples?
11. Is the assessment marking at a consistent level?
12. Is the assessment presentation consistent with course requirements?
Comments
PART E: AUTHENTIC
QUESTIONS YES / NO
13. Has each student had independently carried out their assessments?
14. Is the assessment task authentic/relevant to the field / industry
Comments
-
7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx
4/12
-
7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx
5/12
Student Samples Paper C:
REPORT IN DETAIL
The Post-Assessment Moderation is based on 5 measures. The moderator must check theassessment for its Fairness, Validity, Accuracy, Consistency, and Authenticity.
PART A: FAIR
QUESTIONS YES / NO
1. Does the assessment meet the unit standard / learning outcome requirements?(Honest reflection)
2. Is the assessment produced appropriate to the unit standard / learning outcome?
3. Did all students have a fair chance to succeed in doing the assessment?(Guidelines / timeframe)
4. Has the assessment been impartially marked?
Comments
PART B: VALID
QUESTIONS YES / NO
5. Is the assessment precisely relevant to the learning outcomes / performancecriterias.
6. Is the assessment task current to unit standard / paper and / or industry field?
7. Is the assessment marking reasonable and logical?
Comments
-
7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx
6/12
PART C: ACCURATE
QUESTIONS YES / NO
8. Is the assessment edited / professionally presented and concise? Spelling /punctuation / verbs and tasks?
9. Is the way the assessment is written accurately enough to assess?
Comments
PART D: CONSISTENT (RELIABLE)
QUESTIONS YES / NO
10. Is the assessment consistent across the student samples?
11. Is the assessment marking at a consistent level?
12. Is the assessment presentation consistent with course requirements?
Comments
PART E: AUTHENTIC
QUESTIONS YES / NO
13. Has each student had independently carried out their assessments?
14. Is the assessment task authentic/relevant to the field / industry
Comments
-
7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx
7/12
POST ASSESSMENT MODERATION REPORT
Demonstrate the knowledge of CALCULUS by Differentiate functions anduse differentiation to solve problems (5265)
Programme Name: WLCNZ Diploma in Electronics
Unit / Paper Number: 5265 Paper Name: Demonstrate the knowledge ofCALCULUS by Differentiate functions and usedifferentiation to solve problems
Level: 3 Credits (1-20): 20
Assessor Name: Muhammad WaseemSoomro
Moderation Date: 22 10 2012 Name of Moderator: Saud Altaf
Quick Report Yes / No Comment
Assessment attached
Marking Schedule/Model Answer attached
Samples attached
Suggested answers match the questions
Marking is Fair
Marking is valid
Marking is accurate
Marking is consistent
The student scripts are authentic
Moderator Signature Date 22
10
2012
Student Samples Paper A:
Student Samples Paper B:
-
7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx
8/12
Student Samples Paper C:
REPORT IN DETAIL
The Post-Assessment Moderation is based on 5 measures. The moderator must check theassessment for its Fairness, Validity, Accuracy, Consistency, and Authenticity.
PART A: FAIR
QUESTIONS YES / NO
1. Does the assessment meet the unit standard / learning outcome requirements?(Honest reflection)
2. Is the assessment produced appropriate to the unit standard / learning outcome?
3. Did all students have a fair chance to succeed in doing the assessment?(Guidelines / timeframe)
4. Has the assessment been impartially marked?
Comments
PART B: VALID
QUESTIONS YES / NO
5. Is the assessment precisely relevant to the learning outcomes / performancecriterias.
6. Is the assessment task current to unit standard / paper and / or industry field?
7. Is the assessment marking reasonable and logical?
Comments
-
7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx
9/12
PART C: ACCURATE
QUESTIONS YES / NO
8. Is the assessment edited / professionally presented and concise? Spelling /punctuation / verbs and tasks?
9. Is the way the assessment is written accurately enough to assess?
Comments
PART D: CONSISTENT (RELIABLE)
QUESTIONS YES / NO
10. Is the assessment consistent across the student samples?
11. Is the assessment marking at a consistent level?
12. Is the assessment presentation consistent with course requirements?
Comments
PART E: AUTHENTIC
QUESTIONS YES / NO
13. Has each student had independently carried out their assessments?
14. Is the assessment task authentic/relevant to the field / industry
Comments
-
7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx
10/12
POST ASSESSMENT MODERATION REPORT
Demonstrate the knowledge of TRIGNOMETRY by Manipulating
trigonometric expressions, sketching graphs of trigonometric functions,
and solving equations (5268)
Programme Name: WLCNZ Diploma in Electronics
Unit / Paper Number: 5268 Paper Name Demonstrate the knowledge ofTRIGNOMETRY by Manipulating trigonometric
expressions, sketching graphs of trigonometricfunctions, and solving equations
Level: 3 Credits (1-20): 20
Assessor Name: Muhammad WaseemSoomro
Moderation Date: 05 11 2012 Name of Moderator: Saud Altaf
Quick Report Yes / No Comment
Assessment attached
Marking Schedule/Model Answer attached
Samples attached
Suggested answers match the questions
Marking is Fair
Marking is valid
Marking is accurate
Marking is consistent
The student scripts are authentic
Moderator Signature Date 05 11 2012
Student Samples Paper A:
-
7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx
11/12
Student Samples Paper B:
Student Samples Paper C:
REPORT IN DETAIL
The Post-Assessment Moderation is based on 5 measures. The moderator must check theassessment for its Fairness, Validity, Accuracy, Consistency, and Authenticity.
PART A: FAIR
QUESTIONS YES / NO
1. Does the assessment meet the unit standard / learning outcome requirements?(Honest reflection)
2. Is the assessment produced appropriate to the unit standard / learning outcome?
3. Did all students have a fair chance to succeed in doing the assessment?(Guidelines / timeframe)
4. Has the assessment been impartially marked?
Comments
PART B: VALID
QUESTIONS YES / NO
5. Is the assessment precisely relevant to the learning outcomes / performancecriterias.
6. Is the assessment task current to unit standard / paper and / or industry field?
7. Is the assessment marking reasonable and logical?
Comments
-
7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx
12/12
PART C: ACCURATE
QUESTIONS YES / NO
8. Is the assessment edited / professionally presented and concise? Spelling /punctuation / verbs and tasks?
9. Is the way the assessment is written accurately enough to assess?
Comments
PART D: CONSISTENT (RELIABLE)
QUESTIONS YES / NO
10. Is the assessment consistent across the student samples?
11. Is the assessment marking at a consistent level?
12. Is the assessment presentation consistent with course requirements?
Comments
PART E: AUTHENTIC
QUESTIONS YES / NO
13. Has each student had independently carried out their assessments?
14. Is the assessment task authentic/relevant to the field / industry
Comments