ports - BC Log & Timber · Performance\Report\5197.10 - Module 1 - ASTM E283 and E331 Labatory Air...

52
R:\5197 - Log Wall\5197.10 - Building Science Consulting Services\Report\2012 03 13 Research Report\Appendix A\5197.10 Appendix A Laboratory Air Leakage and water Penetration Test Reports.doc Appendix A: Laboratory Air Leakage and Water Penetration Test Reports Building Enclosure & Energy Performance of Log & Timber Homes PREPARED FOR: BC Log and Timber Frame Home Market Expansion Project SUBMITTED BY RDH Building Engineering Ltd. 224 West 8th Avenue Vancouver, BC V5Y 1N5 Canada PROJECT NUMBER 5197.10 DATE April 29, 2013

Transcript of ports - BC Log & Timber · Performance\Report\5197.10 - Module 1 - ASTM E283 and E331 Labatory Air...

  • R:\5197 - Log Wall\5197.10 - Building Science Consulting Services\Report\2012 03 13 Research Report\Appendix A\5197.10 Appendix A Laboratory Air Leakage and water Penetration Test Reports.doc

    Appendix A: Laboratory Air Leakage and Water Penetration Test Reports

    Building Enclosure &

    Energy Performance of Log &

    Timber H

    omes

    PREPARED FOR: BC Log and Timber Frame Home Market Expansion Project

    SUBMITTED BY RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    224 West 8th Avenue

    Vancouver, BC V5Y 1N5

    Canada

    PROJECT NUMBER 5197.10

    DATE April 29, 2013

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 5197.10 RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    Table of Contents

    ASTM E283 & E331 – Lab Test Report – Module 1

    ASTM E283 & E331 – Lab Test Report – Module 2

    ASTM E283 & E331 – Lab Test Report – Module 3

    ASTM E283 & E331 – Lab Test Report – Module 4

  • R:\5197 - Log Home Building Enclosure Performance\5197.00 - Building Enclosure Performance\Report\5197.10 - Module 1 - ASTM E283 and E331 Labatory Air and Water Test - 2011 11 02.doc

    5197 - Log Hom

    e Building Enclosure Perform

    ance 1.1.1

    ASTM E283 &

    E331 –Lab Test Report –

    Module #1

    TEST STANDARDS ASTM E283-04 “Standard Test Method for Determining Rate of Air Leakage Through Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors Under Specified Pressure Differences Across the Specimen” ASTM E331-00 “Standard Test Method for Water Penetration of Exterior Windows, Skylights, Doors, and Curtain Walls by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference”

    CLIENT BC Log & Timber Building Industry PO Box 2224 100 Mile House, BC V0K 2E0 Canada

    SUBMITTED BY RDH Building Engineering Ltd. 224 West 8th Avenue Vancouver, BC V5Y 1N5 Canada

    PROJECT ADDRESS 27050 Gloucester Way, Langley, B.C.

    WALL Module #1

    REPORT NO DATE DESCRITION

    November 2, 2011 Final Report

    client repor

    t

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    Table of Contents 1. General Information ................................................ 1

    1.1. Attendees ..................................................... 1

    1.2. Test Specimen Description ............................ 1

    2. Summary ................................................................ 2

    1.3. Test Results .................................................. 2

    1.4. Modifications Performed to Achieve Report Performance Rating ...................................... 2

    3. Air Test Results – ASTM E283 .................................. 3

    1.5. Test # 1......................................................... 3

    4. Water Test Results – ASTM E331 ............................. 4

    1.6. Test # 1......................................................... 4

    1.7. Test # 2......................................................... 5

    4.3. Test # 3......................................................... 5

    5. Discussion and Recommendations ......................... 7

    5.1. Air Tightness ................................................. 7

    5.2. Water Ingress Resistance .............................. 7

    Appendix A

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 1 OF 9

    1. General Information

    The following tests were performed to evaluate the performance of a log wall assembly as follows.

    1) A test to determine its air leakage rate when tested in general conformance with ASTM E283.

    2) A test to determine water penetration resistance when tested in geneal conformance with ASTM E331.

    1.1. Attendees

    Table 1.1 General Information

    General

    Testing Agency RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    Test Location 27050 Gloucester Way, Langley, B.C.

    The following people observed the testing in part or whole.

    t Christopher Black – RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    t Dave Ricketts – RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    t Brian Lloyd – Construction Consulting

    t Bob Warren – BC Log & Timber Building Industry

    1.2. Test Specimen Description

    Table 1.2 Specimen Description

    Module #1 – Hand Crafted Wall Assembly

    Wall Assembly Type Module #1- Hand Crafted Scribed Fit Lateral Groove Wall Assembly

    Age 0

    Overall Dimensions (Width x Height)

    2273 mm x 2159 mm (89 ½” x 85”)

    Details Included Wall Assembly

    Material List Doulas fir logs with a log diameter of 14”, a moisture content of 8 to 10%, 3 coats of stain on the exterior, and an average lateral groove width of 3 ½”. EMSEAL Log Home Sealant Tape on both sides of the lateral groove (1/4” x 5/8” (6 mil x 15 mil)).

    Figure 1.1 Overall View of Wall Assembly (Interior Side Visible)

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 2 OF 9

    2. Summary

    1.3. Test Results

    Table 2.1 Test Results Summary

    Module #1 – Hand Crafted Wall Assembly

    Water Test Pressure 0 Pa

    150 Pa

    300 Pa

    Test Method ASTM E283

    ASTM E331

    Details Included Wall Assembly

    Air Test Results 0.0164 L/s.m2 @ 75Pa

    Water Test Results 0 Pa - Fail

    150 Pa – Fail

    300 Pa – Fail

    1.4. Modifications Performed to Achieve Report Performance Rating

    No modifications were required to obtain the ratings listed in Table 2.1.

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 3 OF 9

    3. Air Test Results – ASTM E283

    1.5. Test # 1

    1.5.1 Test Conditions

    Test Date: October 7, 2011

    Test Time: 3:30 pm

    Air Temperature: 18 C

    Barometric Pressure: 102150 Pa

    Relative Humidity: 77 %

    1.5.2 Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 75 Pa – Positive

    Direction of Flow: Infiltration

    Table 3.1.1 Air Leakage Rate

    Results

    Air Leakage Rate per Area (qA) 0.0164 L/s-m2

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 4 OF 9

    4. Water Test Results – ASTM E331

    1.6. Test # 1

    1.6.1 Test Conditions

    Test Date: October 7, 2011

    Test Time: 4:30 pm

    Air Temperature: 18 C

    Relative Humidity: 77 %

    1.6.2 Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 0 Pa

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Table 4.1.1 Water Penetration Observation Points P1, P2, P3, and P4

    Penetration Point

    Water Penetration Points

    P1, P2, P3, and P4

    Penetration is a Failure Mode

    Yes

    Location Between logs at various locations.

    Time to First Water Observation

    1 minute

    Volume of Water A moderate amount of water, constant flow.

    Figure 4.1.1 Water Penetration Between Logs at One of

    the Four Location

    Figure 4.1.2 Location of Water Penetration Observation Points P1, P2, P3, and P4

    P2 P1

    P3

    P4

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 5 OF 9

    Table 4.1.2 Water Penetration Observation Point 5

    Penetration Point

    Water Penetration Point

    P5

    Penetration is a Failure Mode

    Yes

    Location At the thru bolts securing the wall assembly.

    Time to First Water Observation

    1 minute

    Volume of Water A large amount of water, constant flow.

    Figure 4.1.3 Water Penetration Thru Bolts Securing the

    Wall Assembly

    Table 4.1.3 Test Results

    Results

    Result Failure at 0 Pa

    Additional Observations and Comments:

    t Based on previous testing, modifications were made to improve the transition between the interface of the log wall assembly to the wood buck (Figure 4.1.4). However, at some locations along this interface water ingress was observed. It is also possible some of the water ingress observed between the logs maybe be related (Water Penetration Observation Points P2 and P3). Therefore, further modifications will be required to eliminate water ingress at this interface.

    Figure 4.1.4 Improved Interface Between Log Wall Assembly and the Wood Buck

    1.7. Test # 2

    1.7.1 Test Conditions

    Test Date: October 7, 2011

    Test Time: 5:00 pm

    Air Temperature: 18 C

    Relative Humidity: 77 %

    1.7.2 Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 150 Pa

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Table 4.2.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Failure at 150 Pa

    Additional Observations and Comments:

    t Similar to Test #1, water penetration points P1 thru P5 were observed.

    4.3. Test # 3

    1.7.3 Test Conditions

    Test Date: October 7, 2011

    Test Time: 5:30 pm

    Air Temperature: 18 C

    Relative Humidity: 77 %

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 6 OF 9

    1.7.4 Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 300 Pa

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Table 4.3.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Failure at 300 Pa

    Additional Observations and Comments:

    t Similar to Test #1, water penetration points P1 thru P5 were observed.

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 7 OF 9

    5. Discussion and Recommendations

    5.1. Air Tightness

    When tested to the standard of ASTM E283 the specimen, as prepared, achieved an Air Leakage Rate per fixed area (qA) of 0.0164 L/s-m2, when tested at a pressure differential of 75 Pa.

    5.2. Water Ingress Resistance

    When tested to the standard of ASTM E331 the specimen, as prepared, did not prevent water ingress.

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    Christopher Black, MASc, P.Eng.

    Engineer

    Dave Ricketts, P.Eng.

    Principal, Senior Building Science Specialist

    tallinNew Stamp

    tallinNew Stamp

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 8 OF 9

    APPENDIX A

    A.1. Test Pressure Difference

    Air Test

    The ASTM E283 default pressure of 75 Pa was used.

    Water Test

    The test pressure is increased incrementally until the specimen can no long meet the requirements of the standard or it was determine to no longer perform the testing.

    A.2. Test Procedures

    Air Test

    Testing is performed in general conformance with ASTM E283-04 “Standard Test Method for Determining Rate of Air Leakage Through Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors Under Specified Pressure Differences Across the Specimen”.

    Refer to the individual test parameters for the procedure used.

    Water Test

    Testing is performed in general conformance with ASTM E331-00 “Standard Test Method for Water Penetration of Exterior Windows, Skylights, Doors, and Curtain Walls by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference”

    Refer to the individual test parameters for the procedure used.

    A.3. Failure Criteria

    The following is a list of the failure criteria used during testing.

    Air Test

    t The specimen exceeds a specified maximum allowable air flow rate.

    Water Test

    Criteria as defined by the standard

    t Failure occurs when water that penetrates through the frame or other portions of the test specimen and reaches a vertical plane inboard of the innermost projection of the specimen or when water reaches interior finishes or hardware.

    t Failure occurs whenever water penetrates through the perimeter frame of the test specimen.

    A.4. Test Equipment

    Test Wall

    The test wall consists of an aluminum plate supported by a steel frame. The plate is perforated at 462 mm vertically and 267 mm horizontally. At every second hole staggered vertically between columns there is a Spraying Systems Co. – 1/8GG-W 2.8W Fulljet Stainless Steel nozzle installed flush with the plate. Water is pumped through the nozzles with a Summit Type CC pump at the calibrated test pressure. The pressure is controlled by throttling the flow of water with gate valves and is measured by a liquid filled dial water pressure gauge. The test wall is calibrated in accordance with ASTM standards E331 and E547 to a pressure of 159 kPa (23 psi).

    The specimen is set in a wood or fibreglass frame to create a chamber and is supported between 203 ± 51 mm from the test wall during the tests.

    Depressurization

    Depressurization of the test chamber is achieved through a 3” penetration in the test wall. Air is pumped through these penetrations by a model number R93150A GAST regenerative blower and is controlled by a model M12150C LENZE / AC TECH variable frequency drive. The fan moves air into or out of the chamber at a controlled rate to create the desired pressure differential across the specimen. The pressure differential is measured across the chamber wall with one of the following manometers;

    Air Test

    t Dwyer Solid Plastic Stationary Gage, model 201

    t Dwyer Solid Plastic Stationary Gage, model 202.5

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 9 OF 9

    t Meriam Inclined Tube Manometer, model 40HEX35WM

    Water Testing

    t Dwyer Solid Plastic Stationary Gage, model 244

    The volume of air flow is measured with a model Z50MW20-2 Meriam Laminar Flow Element.

    A.5. Documentation

    Terminology

    In the report, water ingress paths and various forms of modifications are denoted in the following manner:

    Water Penetration Points – Points of water penetration on the indoor face of the test specimen, and any water penetration as defined by the standard.

    Adjustments – Adjustments are items on the test specimen where an installed component required realignment to properly interface with another component. These items are designated with an “A” sequence in modifications.

    Deficiencies – Deficiencies are items found on the test specimen that are not manufactured or installed per the manufacturer or project requirements. These items are designated with a “D” sequence in modifications.

    Modifications – Modifications are items that are performed on the test specimen that differ from the manufacturer or project requirements. These items are designated with an “M” sequence in modifications.

    Orientation References

    All references denoting orientation are taken as viewed when facing the test wall and the interior face of the specimen.

    A.6. Deviations from Test Standard

    Water Test

    The test is conducted in general conformance with the test standard with the following exception:

    t The barometric air pressure was not recorded, but was obtained afterwards from the weather station at Abbotsford Airport (CYXX), BC.

  • R:\5197 - Log Home Building Enclosure Performance\5197.00 - Building Enclosure Performance\Report\5197.10 - Module 2 - ASTM E283 and E331 Labatory Air and Water Test - 2012 02 06.doc

    5197 - Log Hom

    e Building Enclosure Perform

    ance

    AS

    TM E283 &

    E331 –Lab Test R

    eport – M

    odule #2

    TEST STANDARDS ASTM E283-04 “Standard Test Method for Determining Rate of Air Leakage Through Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors Under Specified Pressure Differences Across the Specimen”

    ASTM E331-00 “Standard Test Method for Water Penetration of Exterior Windows, Skylights, Doors, and Curtain Walls by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference”

    CLIENT BC Log & Timber Building Industry

    PO Box 2224

    100 Mile House, BC

    V0K 2E0

    Canada

    SUBMITTED BY RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    224 West 8th Avenue

    Vancouver, BC

    V5Y 1N5

    Canada

    WALL Module #2 – Manufactured D-Log Wall Assembly

    REPORT NO DATE DESCRITION

    February 6, 2012 Final Report

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    Table of Contents 1.  General Information ................................................ 1 

    1.1.  Attendees ..................................................... 1 1.2.  Test Specimen Description ............................ 1 

    2.  Summary ................................................................ 2 2.1.  Test Results .................................................. 2 2.2.  Modifications Performed to Achieve Report

    Performance Rating ...................................... 2 3.  Air Test Results – ASTM E283 .................................. 3 

    3.1.  Test # 1......................................................... 3 4.  Water Test Results – ASTM E331 ............................. 4 

    4.1.  Test # 1......................................................... 4 4.2.  Test # 2......................................................... 4 4.3.  Test # 3......................................................... 4 4.4.  Test # 4......................................................... 5 4.5.  Test # 5......................................................... 5 

    5.  Discussion and Recommendations ......................... 6 5.1.  Air Tightness ................................................. 6 5.2.  Water Ingress Resistance .............................. 6 

    Appendix A

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 1 OF 8

    1. General Information

    The following tests were performed to evaluate the performance of a log wall assembly as follows:

    1) A test to determine its air leakage rate when tested in general conformance with ASTM E283.

    2) A test to determine its water penetration resistance when tested in general conformance with ASTM E331.

    1.1. Attendees Table 1.1.1 General Information

    General

    Testing Agency RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    Test Location 27050 Gloucester Way, Langley, B.C.

    The following people observed the testing in part or whole:

    t Christopher Black – RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    t Jeremy Wollin – RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    t Chris Pieper – CW Forestry Services Ltd.

    1.2. Test Specimen Description Table 1.2.1 Specimen Description

    Module #2 – Manufactured D-Log Wall Assembly

    Wall Assembly Type Module #2 – Manufactured D-Log Wall Assembly

    Age 0

    Overall Dimensions (Width x Height)

    2235 mm x 2070 mm (88” x 81 ½”)

    Details Included Wall Assembly

    Material List Mountain pine beetle killed manufactured D-Logs with a finished dimension of 5 ½” wide and 7 ½” height, a moisture content of below 16% before profiling to the final shape, and a double tongue and groove. Loctite PL premium polyurethane construction adhesive was used within the double tongue and groove. 

    Fig. 1.2.2 Overall View of Wall Assembly (Interior Side

    Visible)

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 2 OF 8

    2. Summary

    2.1. Test Results Table 2.1.1 Test Results Summary

    Module #2 – Manufactured D-Log Wall Assembly

    Water Test Pressure 0 Pa

    150 Pa

    300 Pa

    500 Pa

    700 Pa

    Test Method ASTM E283

    ASTM E331

    Details Included Wall assembly only

    Air Test Results 0.0117 L/s.m2 @ 75Pa

    Water Test Results 0 Pa - Pass

    150 Pa – Pass

    300 Pa – Pass

    500 Pa – Pass

    700 Pa – Pass

    2.2. Modifications Performed to Achieve Report Performance Rating

    No modifications were required to obtain the ratings listed in Table 2.1.1

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 3 OF 8

    3. Air Test Results – ASTM E283

    3.1. Test # 1

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: January 27, 2012

    Test Time: 3:30 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Barometric Pressure: 103,370 Pa

    Relative Humidity: 61%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 75 Pa – Positive

    Direction of Flow: Infiltration

    Table 3.1.1 Air Leakage Rate

    Results

    Air Leakage Rate per Area (qA) 0.0117 L/s–m2

    Fig. 3.1.2 Air Leakage Testing

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 4 OF 8

    4. Water Test Results – ASTM E331

    4.1. Test # 1

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: January 27, 2012

    Test Time: 4:00 pm

    Air Temperature: 19C

    Relative Humidity: 61%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 0 Pa

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

    Fig. 4.1.1 Log Wall Prepared for Water Testing

    Table 4.1.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 0 Pa

    4.2. Test # 2

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: January 27, 2012

    Test Time: 4:30 pm

    Air Temperature: 19C

    Relative Humidity: 61%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 150 Pa

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

    Table 4.2.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 150 Pa

    4.3. Test # 3

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: January 27, 2012

    Test Time: 5:00 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Relative Humidity: 65%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 300 Pa

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

    Table 4.3.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 300 Pa

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 5 OF 8

    4.4. Test # 4

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: January 27, 2012

    Test Time: 5:30 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Relative Humidity: 65%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 500 Pa

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

    Table 4.4.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 500 Pa

    4.5. Test # 5

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: January 27, 2012

    Test Time: 6:00 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Relative Humidity: 70%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 700 Pa

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

    Table 4.5.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 700 Pa

    Additional Observations and Comments:

    t Five minutes after the test was complete, at a couple of locations, water ingress was observed originating from the knots in the wall assembly.

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 6 OF 8

    5. Discussion and Recommendations

    5.1. Air Tightness

    When tested to the standard of ASTM E283 the specimen, as prepared, achieved an Air Leakage Rate per fixed area (qA) of 0.0117 L/s–m2, when tested at a pressure differential of 75 Pa.

    5.2. Water Ingress Resistance

    When tested to the standard of ASTM E331 no water ingress was observed through the specimen, as prepared, at differential pressures of 0, 75, 150, 300, 500, and 700 Pa.

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    Christopher Black, MASc, P.Eng.

    Engineer

    Dave Ricketts, P.Eng.

    Principal, Senior Building Science Specialist

    tallinNew Stamp

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 7 OF 8

    APPENDIX A

    A.1. Test Pressure Difference

    Air Test

    The ASTM E283 default pressure of 75 Pa was used.

    Water Test

    The test pressure is increased incrementally until the specimen can no longer meet the requirements of the standard or it was determined to no longer perform the testing.

    A.2. Test Procedures

    Air Test

    Testing is performed in general conformance with ASTM E283-04 “Standard Test Method for Determining Rate of Air Leakage Through Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors Under Specified Pressure Differences Across the Specimen”.

    Refer to the individual test parameters for the procedure used.

    Water Test

    Testing is performed in general conformance with ASTM E331-00 “Standard Test Method for Water Penetration of Exterior Windows, Skylights, Doors, and Curtain Walls by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference”

    Refer to the individual test parameters for the procedure used.

    A.3. Failure Criteria

    The following is a list of the failure criteria used during testing:

    Air Test

    t The specimen exceeds a specified maximum allowable air flow rate.

    Water Test

    Criteria as defined by the standard:

    t Failure occurs when water that penetrates through the frame or other portions of the test specimen and reaches a vertical plane inboard of the innermost projection of the specimen or when water reaches interior finishes or hardware.

    t Failure occurs whenever water penetrates through the perimeter frame of the test specimen.

    A.4. Test Equipment

    Test Wall

    The test wall consists of an aluminum plate supported by a steel frame. The plate is perforated at 462 mm vertically and 267 mm horizontally. At every second hole staggered vertically between columns there is a Spraying Systems Co. – 1/8GG-W 2.8W Fulljet Stainless Steel nozzle installed flush with the plate. Water is pumped through the nozzles with a Summit Type CC pump at the calibrated test pressure. The pressure is controlled by throttling the flow of water with gate valves and is measured by a liquid-filled dial water pressure gauge. The test wall is calibrated in accordance with ASTM standards E331 and E547 to a pressure of 159 kPa (23 psi).

    The specimen is set in a wood or fibreglass frame to create a chamber and is supported between 203 ± 51 mm from the test wall during the tests.

    Depressurization

    Depressurization of the test chamber is achieved through a 3” penetration in the test wall. Air is pumped through these penetrations by a model number R93150A GAST regenerative blower and is controlled by a model M12150C LENZE / AC TECH variable frequency drive. The fan moves air into or out of the chamber at a controlled rate to create the desired pressure differential across the specimen. The pressure differential is measured across the chamber wall with one of the following manometers:

    Air Test

    t Dwyer Solid Plastic Stationary Gage, model 201

    t Dwyer Solid Plastic Stationary Gage, model 202.5

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 8 OF 8

    t Meriam Inclined Tube Manometer, model 40HEX35WM

    Water Testing

    t Dwyer Solid Plastic Stationary Gage, model 244

    The volume of air flow is measured with a model Z50MW20-2 Meriam Laminar Flow Element.

    A.5. Documentation

    Terminology

    In the report, water ingress paths and various forms of modifications are denoted in the following manner:

    Water Penetration Points – Points of water penetration on the indoor face of the test specimen, and any water penetration as defined by the standard.

    Adjustments – Adjustments are items on the test specimen where an installed component required realignment to properly interface with another component. These items are designated with an “A” sequence in modifications.

    Deficiencies – Deficiencies are items found on the test specimen that are not manufactured or installed per the manufacturer or project requirements. These items are designated with a “D” sequence in modifications.

    Modifications – Modifications are items that are performed on the test specimen that differ from the manufacturer or project requirements. These items are designated with an “M” sequence in modifications.

    Orientation References

    All references denoting orientation are taken as viewed when facing the test wall and the interior face of the specimen.

    A.6. Deviations from Test Standard

    Water Test

    The test is conducted in general conformance with the test standard with the following exception:

    t The barometric air pressure was not recorded, but was obtained afterwards from the weather station at Abbotsford Airport (CYXX), BC.

  • R:\5197 - Log Home Building Enclosure Performance\5197.10 - Building Science Consulting Services\Report\5197.10 - Module 3 - ASTM E283 and E331 Labatory Air and Water Test - 2013 01 25.doc

    5197.10 - Log Hom

    e Building Enclosure Perform

    ance 1.1.1

    ASTM E283 &

    E331 –Lab Test Report –

    Module #3

    TEST STANDARDS ASTM E283-04 “Standard Test Method for Determining Rate of Air Leakage Through Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors Under Specified Pressure Differences Across the Specimen” ASTM E331-00 “Standard Test Method for Water Penetration of Exterior Windows, Skylights, Doors, and Curtain Walls by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference”

    CLIENT BC Log & Timber Building Industry PO Box 2224 100 Mile House, BC V0K 2E0 Canada

    SUBMITTED BY RDH Building Engineering Ltd. 224 West 8th Avenue Vancouver, BC V5Y 1N5 Canada

    WALL Module #3 – Square Log Wall Assembly

    REPORT NO DATE DESCRITION

    January 25, 2013 Draft Report

    client repor

    t

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    Table of Contents 1. General Information ................................................ 1

    1.1. Attendees ..................................................... 1

    1.2. Test Specimen Description ............................ 1

    2. Summary ................................................................ 2

    2.1. Test Results .................................................. 2

    2.2. Modifications Performed to Achieve Report Performance Rating ...................................... 2

    3. Air Test Results – ASTM E283 .................................. 3

    3.1. Test # 1 – 75 Pa, Not Vented to Exterior ......... 3

    3.2. Test # 2 – 75 Pa, Vented to Exterior ............... 3

    4. Water Test Results – ASTM E331 ............................. 4

    4.1. Test # 3 – 0 Pa, Vented to Exterior ................. 4

    4.2. Test # 4 - 150 Pa, Vented to Exterior .............. 4

    4.3. Test # 5 - 300 Pa, Vented to Exterior .............. 4

    4.4. Test # 6 - 500 Pa, Vented to Exterior .............. 4

    4.5. Test # 7 - 150 Pa, Not Vented to Exterior ........ 5

    4.6. Test # 8 - 300 Pa, Not Vented to Exterior ........ 5

    4.7. Test # 9 - 500 Pa, Not Vented to Exterior ........ 5

    5. Discussion and Recommendations ......................... 6

    5.1. Pressure Equalization ................................... 6

    5.2. Air Tightness ................................................. 6

    5.3. Water Ingress Resistance .............................. 6

    Appendix A – Test Procedures and Setup

    Appendix B – Typical Details for Log Test Wall Assembly

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 1 OF 9

    1. General Information

    The following tests were performed to evaluate the performance of the log wall assembly:

    1) A test to determine the log wall air leakage rate when the vertical tie-down rod chase and lateral grooves were not connected to the exterior side of the wall (not vented). Test performed in general conformance with ASTM E283.

    2) A test to determine the log wall air leakage rate when the vertical tie-down rod chase and lateral grooves were connected to the exterior side of the wall with a 1¼” hole (vented). Test performed in general conformance with ASTM E283.

    3) A test to determine the log wall water penetration resistance when the vertical tie-down rod chase and lateral grooves were not connected to the exterior (not vented). Test performed in general conformance with ASTM E331.

    4) A test to determine the log wall water penetration resistance when the vertical tie-down rod chase and lateral grooves were connected to the exterior side of the wall with a 1¼” hole (vented). Test performed in general conformance with ASTM E331.

    1.1. Attendees

    Table 1.1.1 General Information

    General

    Testing Agency RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    Test Location 27050 Gloucester Way, Langley, B.C.

    The following people observed the testing in part or whole:

    t Dave Ricketts – RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    t Christopher Black – RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    t Luke King – RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    t Aaron Moore – Brian Moore Log Homes

    t Philippo Pierini – Brian Moore Log Homes

    t John Boys – Nicola Logworks Ltd.

    1.2. Test Specimen Description

    Table 1.2.1 Specimen Description

    Module #3 – Square Log Wall Assembly

    Wall Assembly Type Module #3 – 12”x12” Square Log Wall Assembly

    Age 0

    Overall Dimensions (Width x Height)

    2244 mm x 2084 mm (88 1/3” x 82”)

    Details Included Wall Assembly

    Material List Square red cedar logs with finished dimensions of 11 ½” by 11 ½”. A 5/8” 45˚ bevel was routed on all four corners of the log. Logs were joined with a tongue and groove notch which included a double P-gasket (ext. & int.). Threaded tie down rods (3/4” diameter) were installed in an oversized 1¼” chase.

    The lateral grooves were vented to the exterior by two oversized tie-down rod chases that ran vertically the height of the test wall and exited to the exterior side of the wall on a diagonal in the bottom log, refer to Appendix B. The diagonal holes vented to the exterior side of the wall were plugged and sealed when simulating a lateral grove which was not vented.

    Five pressure taps were installed at various locations to monitor the pressure difference between the lateral groove and the exterior, refer to Fig. 1.2.2 and Fig. 5.1.1.

    Fig. 1.2.2 Overall interior view of wall assembly showing 5 pressure taps connected with vinyl tubing.

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 2 OF 9

    2. Summary

    2.1. Test Results

    Table 2.1.1 Test Results Summary

    Module #3 – Square Log Wall Assembly

    Lateral grooves vented to the exterior

    Lateral grooves not vented to the exterior

    Water Test Pressure

    0 Pa

    150 Pa

    300 Pa

    500 Pa

    150 Pa

    300 Pa

    500 Pa

    Test Method ASTM E283

    ASTM E331

    ASTM E283

    ASTM E331

    Details Included

    Wall assembly only Wall assembly only

    Air Test Results

    0.00642 L/s.m2 @ 75Pa

    0.00642 L/s.m2 @ 75Pa

    Water Test Results

    0 Pa – Pass

    150 Pa – Pass

    300 Pa – Pass

    500 Pa – Pass

    150 Pa – Pass

    300 Pa – Pass

    500 Pa – Pass

    2.2. Modifications Performed to Achieve Report Performance Rating

    No modifications were required to obtain the ratings listed in Table 2.1.1

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 3 OF 9

    3. Air Test Results – ASTM E283

    3.1. Test # 1 – 75 Pa, Not Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 14, 2012

    Test Time: 6:20 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Barometric Pressure: 101,360 Pa

    Relative Humidity: 88%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 75 Pa – Positive

    Assembly: Not vented to exterior

    Direction of Flow: Infiltration

    Table 3.1.1 Air Leakage Rate

    Results

    Air Leakage Rate per Area (qA) 0.00642 L/s∙m2

    3.2. Test # 2 – 75 Pa, Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 14, 2012

    Test Time: 7:15 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Barometric Pressure: 101,340 Pa

    Relative Humidity: 92%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 75 Pa – Positive

    Assembly: Vented to exterior

    Direction of Flow: Infiltration

    Table 3.2.1 Air Leakage Rate

    Results

    Air Leakage Rate per Area (qA) 0.00642 L/s∙m2

    Fig. 3.2.2 Air Leakage Testing

    Fig. 3.2.3 Plugs installed in the holes connecting the lateral groove to the exterior. These plugs were removed when the test wall was vented to the exterior

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 4 OF 9

    4. Water Test Results – ASTM E331

    4.1. Test # 3 – 0 Pa, Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 14, 2012

    Test Time: 7:38 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Relative Humidity: 92%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 0 Pa

    Assembly: Vented to exterior

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

    Table 4.1.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 0 Pa

    4.2. Test # 4 - 150 Pa, Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 14, 2012

    Test Time: 7:58 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Relative Humidity: 94%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 150 Pa

    Assembly: Vented to exterior

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

    Table 4.2.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 150 Pa

    4.3. Test # 5 - 300 Pa, Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 14, 2012

    Test Time: 8:17 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Relative Humidity: 94%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 300 Pa

    Assembly: Vented to exterior

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

    Table 4.3.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 300 Pa

    4.4. Test # 6 - 500 Pa, Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 14, 2012

    Test Time: 8:35 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Relative Humidity: 94-%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 500 Pa

    Assembly: Vented to exterior

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 5 OF 9

    Table 4.4.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 500 Pa

    4.5. Test # 7 - 150 Pa, Not Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 14, 2012

    Test Time: 9:30 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Relative Humidity: 95%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 150 Pa

    Assembly: Not Vented to exterior

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

    Table 4.5.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 150 Pa

    4.6. Test # 8 - 300 Pa, Not Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 14, 2012

    Test Time: 9:51 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Relative Humidity: 95%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 300 Pa

    Assembly: Not Vented to exterior

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

    Table 4.6.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 300 Pa

    4.7. Test # 9 - 500 Pa, Not Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 14, 2012

    Test Time: 10:09 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Relative Humidity: 95%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 500 Pa

    Assembly: Not Vented to Exterior

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

    Table 4.7.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 500 Pa

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 6 OF 9

    5. Discussion and Recommendations

    5.1. Pressure Equalization

    Five pressure taps were installed at various locations throughout the wall assembly. The pressure taps were used to assess the effectiveness of venting to the exterior in achieving pressure moderation between the lateral grooves and the exterior. The pressure difference at pressure taps was recorded during each test unless noted otherwise. Fig. 5.1.1 is an elevation of the test wall which indicates the location of the pressure taps and the threaded tie-down rods with oversized chases.

    Fig. 5.1.1 Elevation of test wall which indicates the location

    of the pressure taps and threaded tie-down rods with oversized chases

    Table 5.1 Pressure difference at pressure tap locations.

    Test # Vented/not vented to exterior

    Test

    ΔP (pa)

    ΔP (pa) at pressure tap locations

    1 2 3 4 5

    1 Not vented 75 19 19 19 19 19

    2 Vented 75 75 60 57 57 60

    3 Vented 0 NA NA NA NA NA

    4 Vented 150 140 100 95 95 NA

    5 Vented 300 300 196 180 178 199

    6 Vented 500 470 270 253 258 272

    7 Not vented 150 5 NA NA NA NA

    8 Not vented 300 1 NA NA NA NA

    9 Not vented 500 3 NA NA NA NA

    The results shown in Table 5.1 indicate that venting the lateral grooves to the exterior was effective in achieving pressure moderation; however, at higher test pressures the moderation was less effective. As such, if this technique is to be used it may be recommended to increase the size of the holes connecting the lateral grooves to the exterior.

    5.2. Air Tightness

    When the lateral grooves were not vented to the exterior and the log wall assembly was tested to the standard of ASTM E283, the assembly achieved an Air Leakage Rate per fixed area (qA) of 0.00642 L/s∙m2, when tested at a pressure differential of 75 Pa.

    When the lateral grooves were vented to the exterior and the log wall assembly was retested to the standard of ASTM E283, the log wall assembly achieved an Air Leakage Rate per fixed area (qA) of 0.00642 L/s∙m2, when tested at a pressure differential of 75 Pa.

    5.3. Water Ingress Resistance

    When the lateral grooves were not vented to the exterior and the log wall assembly was tested to the standard of ASTM E331, no water ingress was observed through the specimen at differential pressures of 0, 150, 300, and 500 Pa.

    When the lateral grooves were vented to the exterior and the log wall assembly was retested to the standard of ASTM E331, no water ingress was observed through the specimen at differential pressures of 150, 300, and 500 Pa.

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    Christopher Black, MASc, P.Eng.

    Project Engineer

    Dave Ricketts, P.Eng.

    Principal, Senior Building Science Specialist

    ¾” threaded tie-down rod

    1 ¼” oversized chase

    tallinNew Stamp

    tallinNew Stamp

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 7 OF 9

    APPENDIX A – TEST PROCEDURES AND SETUP

    A.1. Test Pressure Difference

    Air Test

    The ASTM E283 default pressure of 75 Pa was used.

    Water Test

    The test pressure is increased incrementally until the specimen can no longer meet the requirements of the standard or it was determined to no longer perform the testing.

    A.2. Test Procedures

    Air Test

    Testing is performed in general conformance with ASTM E283-04 “Standard Test Method for Determining Rate of Air Leakage Through Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors Under Specified Pressure Differences Across the Specimen”.

    Refer to the individual test parameters for the procedure used.

    Water Test

    Testing is performed in general conformance with ASTM E331-00 “Standard Test Method for Water Penetration of Exterior Windows, Skylights, Doors, and Curtain Walls by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference”

    Refer to the individual test parameters for the procedure used.

    A.3. Failure Criteria

    The following is a list of the failure criteria used during testing:

    Air Test

    t The specimen exceeds a specified maximum allowable air flow rate.

    Water Test

    Criteria as defined by the standard:

    t Failure occurs when water that penetrates through the frame or other portions of the test specimen and reaches a vertical plane inboard of the innermost projection of the specimen or when water reaches interior finishes or hardware.

    t Failure occurs whenever water penetrates through the perimeter frame of the test specimen.

    A.4. Test Equipment

    Test Wall

    The test wall consists of an aluminum plate supported by a steel frame. The plate is perforated at 462 mm vertically and 267 mm horizontally. At every second hole staggered vertically between columns there is a Spraying Systems Co. – 1/8GG-W 2.8W Fulljet Stainless Steel nozzle installed flush with the plate. Water is pumped through the nozzles with a Summit Type CC pump at the calibrated test pressure. The pressure is controlled by throttling the flow of water with gate valves and is measured by a liquid-filled dial water pressure gauge. The test wall is calibrated in accordance with ASTM standards E331 and E547 to a pressure of 159 kPa (23 psi).

    The specimen is set in a wood or fibreglass frame to create a chamber and is supported between 203 ± 51 mm from the test wall during the tests.

    Depressurization

    Depressurization of the test chamber is achieved through a 3” penetration in the test wall. Air is pumped through these penetrations by a model number R93150A GAST regenerative blower and is controlled by a model M12150C LENZE / AC TECH variable frequency drive. The fan moves air into or out of the chamber at a controlled rate to create the desired pressure differential across the specimen. The pressure differential is measured across the chamber wall with one of the following manometers:

    Air Test

    t Dwyer Solid Plastic Stationary Gage, model 201

    t Dwyer Solid Plastic Stationary Gage, model 202.5

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 8 OF 9

    t Meriam Inclined Tube Manometer, model 40HEX35WM

    Water Testing

    t Dwyer Solid Plastic Stationary Gage, model 244

    The volume of air flow is measured with a model Z50MW20-2 Meriam Laminar Flow Element.

    The pressure difference between the lateral groove and the exterior was measured with an Alnor AXD 610 manometer.

    A.5. Documentation

    Terminology

    In the report, water ingress paths and various forms of modifications are denoted in the following manner:

    Water Penetration Points – Points of water penetration on the indoor face of the test specimen, and any water penetration as defined by the standard.

    Adjustments – Adjustments are items on the test specimen where an installed component required realignment to properly interface with another component. These items are designated with an “A” sequence in modifications.

    Deficiencies – Deficiencies are items found on the test specimen that are not manufactured or installed per the manufacturer or project requirements. These items are designated with a “D” sequence in modifications.

    Modifications – Modifications are items that are performed on the test specimen that differ from the manufacturer or project requirements. These items are designated with an “M” sequence in modifications.

    Orientation References

    All references denoting orientation are taken as viewed when facing the test wall and the interior face of the specimen.

    A.6. Deviations from Test Standard

    Water Test

    The test is conducted in general conformance with the test standard with the following exception:

    t The barometric air pressure was not recorded, but was obtained afterwards from a nearby weather station in Pitt Meadows, BC.

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 9 OF 9

    APPENDIX B - TYPICAL DETAILS FOR LOG TEST WALL ASSEMBLY

    Rendering of a typical log test wall assembly showing an unobstructed later groove which is vented to the exterior by an oversized tie-down rod chases and a diagonal hole exiting to the exterior side of the wall within the bottom log.

  • R:\5197 - Log Home Building Enclosure Performance\5197.10 - Building Science Consulting Services\Report\5197.10 - Module 4 - ASTM E283 and E331 Labatory Air and Water Test - 2013 01 25.doc

    5197.10 - Log Hom

    e Building Enclosure Perform

    ance 1.1.1

    ASTM E283 &

    E331 –Lab Test Report –

    Module #4

    TEST STANDARDS ASTM E283-04 “Standard Test Method for Determining Rate of Air Leakage Through Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors Under Specified Pressure Differences Across the Specimen” ASTM E331-00 “Standard Test Method for Water Penetration of Exterior Windows, Skylights, Doors, and Curtain Walls by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference”

    CLIENT BC Log & Timber Building Industry PO Box 2224 100 Mile House, BC V0K 2E0 Canada

    SUBMITTED BY RDH Building Engineering Ltd. 224 West 8th Avenue Vancouver, BC V5Y 1N5 Canada

    WALL Module #4 – Scribe Fit Log Wall Assembly

    REPORT NO DATE DESCRITION

    February 12, 2013 Draft Report

    client repor

    t

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    Table of Contents 1. General Information ................................................ 1

    1.1. Attendees ..................................................... 1

    1.2. Test Specimen Description ............................ 1

    2. Summary ................................................................ 2

    2.1. Test Results .................................................. 2

    2.2. Modifications Performed to Achieve Report Performance Rating ...................................... 2

    3. Air Test Results – ASTM E283 .................................. 3

    3.1. Test # 1 – 75 Pa, Not Vented to Exterior ......... 3

    3.2. Test # 2 – 75 Pa, Vented to Exterior ............... 3

    3.3. Test # 3 – 300 Pa, Vented to Exterior ............. 3

    4. Water Test Results – ASTM E331 ............................. 4

    4.1. Test # 4 – 0 Pa, Vented to Exterior ................. 4

    4.2. Test # 5 - 150 Pa, Vented to Exterior .............. 4

    4.3. Test # 6 - 300 Pa, Vented to Exterior .............. 4

    4.4. Test # 7 - 500 Pa, Vented to Exterior .............. 4

    4.5. Test # 8 - 150 Pa, Not Vented to Exterior ........ 5

    4.6. Test # 9 - 300 Pa, Not Vented to Exterior ........ 5

    4.7. Test # 10 - 500 Pa, Not Vented to Exterior ...... 5

    5. Discussion and Recommendations ......................... 6

    5.1. Pressure Equalization ................................... 6

    5.2. Air Tightness ................................................. 6

    5.3. Water Ingress Resistance .............................. 6

    Appendix A – Test Procedures and Setup

    Appendix B – Typical Details for Log Test Wall Assembly

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 1 OF 10

    1. General Information

    The following tests were performed to evaluate the performance of the log wall assembly:

    1) A test to determine the log wall air leakage rate when the vertical tie-down rod chase and lateral grooves were not connected to the exterior side of the wall (not vented). Test performed in general conformance with ASTM E283.

    2) A test to determine the log wall air leakage rate when the vertical tie-down rod chase and lateral grooves were connected to the exterior side of the wall with a 1¼” hole (vented). Test performed in general conformance with ASTM E283.

    3) A test to determine the log wall water penetration resistance when the vertical tie-down rod chase and lateral grooves were not connected to the exterior (not vented). Test performed in general conformance with ASTM E331.

    4) A test to determine the log wall water penetration resistance when the vertical tie-down rod chase and lateral grooves were connected to the exterior side of the wall with a 1¼” hole (vented). Test performed in general conformance with ASTM E331.

    1.1. Attendees

    Table 1.1.1 General Information

    General

    Testing Agency RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    Test Location 27050 Gloucester Way, Langley, B.C.

    The following people observed the testing in part or whole:

    t Dave Ricketts - RDH Building Engineering Ltd

    t Christopher Black – RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    t Luke King – RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    t John Boys – Nicola Logworks Ltd.

    1.2. Test Specimen Description

    Table 1.2.1 Specimen Description

    Module #4 – 14” Scribe Fit Log Wall Assembly

    Wall Assembly Type Module #4 – 14” Scribe Fit Log Wall Assembly

    Age 0

    Overall Dimensions (Width x Height)

    2304 mm x 2224 mm (91 5/8” x 87 ½ ”)

    Details Included Wall Assembly

    Material List Shop dried, douglas fir logs with diameters ranging from 11” to 14”. The test Log assembly was hand built using a scribe-fit technique. Scribed joints included a double P-gasket (ext. & int.). Threaded tie down rods (3/4” diameter) were installed in an oversized 1¼” chase.

    The lateral grooves were vented to the exterior by two oversized tie-down rod chases that ran vertically the height of the test wall and exited to the exterior side of the wall on a diagonal in the bottom log, refer to Appendix B. The diagonal holes vented to the exterior side of the wall were plugged and sealed when simulating a lateral grove which was not vented.

    Eight pressure taps were installed at various locations to monitor the pressure difference between the lateral groove and the exterior, refer to Fig. 1.2.2 and Fig. 5.1.1.

    Fig. 1.2.2 Overall interior view of wall assembly showing 8 pressure taps connected with vinyl tubing.

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 2 OF 10

    2. Summary

    2.1. Test Results

    Table 2.1.1 Test Results Summary

    Module #4 – 14” Scribe Fit Log Wall Assembly

    Lateral grooves vented to the exterior

    Lateral grooves not vented to the exterior

    Water Test Pressure

    0 Pa

    150 Pa

    300 Pa

    500 Pa

    150 Pa

    300 Pa

    500 Pa

    Test Method ASTM E283

    ASTM E331

    ASTM E283

    ASTM E331

    Details Included

    Wall assembly only Wall assembly only

    Air Test Results

    0.0058 L/s.m2 @ 75Pa

    0.0058 L/s.m2 @ 75Pa

    Water Test Results

    0 Pa – Pass

    150 Pa – Pass

    300 Pa – Pass

    500 Pa – Pass

    150 Pa – Pass

    300 Pa – Pass

    500 Pa – Pass

    2.2. Modifications Performed to Achieve Report Performance Rating

    No modifications were required to obtain the ratings listed in Table 2.1.1

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 3 OF 10

    3. Air Test Results – ASTM E283

    3.1. Test # 1 – 75 Pa, Not Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 15, 2012

    Test Time: 10:45 am

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Barometric Pressure: 100,460 Pa

    Relative Humidity: 92%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 75 Pa – Positive

    Assembly: Not Vented to Exterior

    Direction of Flow: Infiltration

    Table 3.1.1 Air Leakage Rate

    Results

    Air Leakage Rate per Area (qA) 0.0058 L/s∙m2

    3.2. Test # 2 – 75 Pa, Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 15, 2012

    Test Time: 11:10 am

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Barometric Pressure: 100,340 Pa

    Relative Humidity: 93%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 75 Pa – Positive

    Assembly: Vented to Exterior

    Direction of Flow: Infiltration

    Table 3.2.1 Air Leakage Rate

    Results

    Air Leakage Rate per Area (qA) 0.0058 L/s∙m2

    Fig. 3.2.2 Air Leakage Testing

    3.3. Test # 3 – 300 Pa, Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 15, 2012

    Test Time: 11:17 am

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Barometric Pressure: 100,340 Pa

    Relative Humidity: 93%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 300 Pa – Positive

    Assembly: Vented to Exterior

    Direction of Flow: Infiltration

    Table 3.3.1 Air Leakage Rate

    Results

    Air Leakage Rate per Area (qA) 0.0058 L/s∙m2

    Fig. 3.3.2 1 ¼” holes venting lateral grooves to the exterior side of the wall

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 4 OF 10

    4. Water Test Results – ASTM E331

    4.1. Test # 4 – 0 Pa, Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 15, 2012

    Test Time: 12:28 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Relative Humidity: 94%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 0 Pa

    Assembly: Vented to Exterior

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

    Table 4.1.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 0 Pa

    4.2. Test # 5 - 150 Pa, Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 15, 2012

    Test Time: 12:45 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Relative Humidity: 94%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 150 Pa

    Assembly: Vented to Exterior

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

    Table 4.2.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 150 Pa

    4.3. Test # 6 - 300 Pa, Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 15, 2012

    Test Time: 1:03 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Relative Humidity: 94%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 300 Pa

    Assembly: Vented to Exterior

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

    Table 4.3.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 300 Pa

    4.4. Test # 7 - 500 Pa, Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 15, 2012

    Test Time: 1:25 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Relative Humidity: 94%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 500 Pa

    Assembly: Vented to Exterior

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 5 OF 10

    Table 4.4.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 500 Pa

    4.5. Test # 8 - 150 Pa, Not Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 15, 2012

    Test Time: 2:55 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Relative Humidity: 94%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 150 Pa

    Assembly: Not Vented to Exterior

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

    Table 4.5.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 150 Pa

    4.6. Test # 9 - 300 Pa, Not Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 15, 2012

    Test Time: 3:12 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Relative Humidity: 94%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 300 Pa

    Assembly: Not Vented to Exterior

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

    Table 4.6.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 300 Pa

    4.7. Test # 10 - 500 Pa, Not Vented to Exterior

    Test Conditions

    Test Date: December 15, 2012

    Test Time: 3:32 pm

    Air Temperature: 18C

    Relative Humidity: 94%

    Test Parameters

    Pressure Difference: 500 Pa

    Assembly: Not Vented to Exterior

    Duration: 15 min (Complete)

    Procedure: Uniform Static

    Observations: No evidence of water ingress.

    Table 4.7.1 Test Results

    Results

    Result Pass at 500 Pa

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 6 OF 10

    5. Discussion and Recommendations

    5.1. Pressure Equalization

    Eight pressure taps were installed at various locations throughout the wall assembly. The pressure taps were used to assess the effectiveness of venting to the exterior in achieving pressure moderation between the lateral grooves and the exterior. The pressure difference at pressure taps was recorded during each test unless noted otherwise. Fig. 5.1.1 is an elevation of the test wall which indicates the locations of the pressure taps and the threaded tie-down rods with oversized chases.

    Fig. 5.1.1 Elevation of test wall which indicates the location

    of the pressure taps and threaded tie-down rods with oversized chases

    Table 5.1 Pressure difference at pressure tap locations

    Test #

    Vented/ not

    vented to exterior

    ΔP

    (pa)

    ΔP (pa) at pressure tap locations

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    1 Not vented

    75 9 5 10 4 8 7 11 7

    2 Vented 75 57 18 73 31 63 54 73 75

    3 Vented 300 209 75 275 105 219 186 266 269

    4 Vented 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5 Vented 150 40 NA NA 45 89 75 NA NA 6 Vented 300 135 NA NA 85 190 156 NA NA 7 Vented 500 213 NA NA 145 279 235 NA NA 8 Not

    vented 150 1 NA NA 0.7 0.7 0.7 NA NA

    9 Not vented

    300 0.5 NA NA 0.4 0.2 0.1 NA NA

    10 Not vented

    500 0.9 NA NA 0.5 0.7 0.1 NA NA

    The results shown in Error! Reference source not found. indicate that venting the lateral grooves to the exterior was effective in achieving pressure moderation; however, at higher test pressures the moderation was less effective. As such, if this technique is to be used it may be recommended to increase the size of the holes connecting the lateral grooves to the exterior.

    5.2. Air Tightness

    When the lateral grooves were not vented to the exterior and the log wall assembly was tested to the standard of ASTM E283, the log wall assembly achieved an Air Leakage Rate per fixed area (qA) of 0.0058 L/s∙m2, when tested at a pressure differential of 75 Pa.

    When the lateral grooves were vented to the exterior and the log wall assembly was retested to the standard of ASTM E283, the log wall assembly achieved an Air Leakage Rate per fixed area (qA) of 0.00582 L/s∙m2, when tested at a pressure differential of 75 Pa. When tested at a differential pressure of 300 Pa, the Air Leakage Rate per fixed area (qA) was 0.00582 L/s∙m2

    5.3. Water Ingress Resistance

    When the lateral grooves were not vented to the exterior and the log wall assembly was tested to the standard of ASTM E331, no water ingress was observed through the specimen, at differential pressures of 0, 150, 300, and 500 Pa.

    When the lateral grooves were vented to the exterior and the log wall assembly was retested to the standard of ASTM E331, no water ingress was observed through the specimen, at differential pressures of 150, 300, and 500 Pa.

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    Christopher Black, MASc, P.Eng.

    Engineer

    ¾” threaded tie-down rod

    1 ¼” oversized chase

    tallinNew Stamp

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 7 OF 10

    Dave Ricketts, P.Eng.

    Principal, Senior Building Science Specialist

    tallinNew Stamp

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 8 OF 10

    APPENDIX A – TEST PROCEDURES AND SETUP

    A.1. Test Pressure Difference

    Air Test

    The ASTM E283 default pressure of 75 Pa was used.

    Water Test

    The test pressure is increased incrementally until the specimen can no longer meet the requirements of the standard or it was determined to no longer perform the testing.

    A.2. Test Procedures

    Air Test

    Testing is performed in general conformance with ASTM E283-04 “Standard Test Method for Determining Rate of Air Leakage Through Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors Under Specified Pressure Differences Across the Specimen”.

    Refer to the individual test parameters for the procedure used.

    Water Test

    Testing is performed in general conformance with ASTM E331-00 “Standard Test Method for Water Penetration of Exterior Windows, Skylights, Doors, and Curtain Walls by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference”

    Refer to the individual test parameters for the procedure used.

    A.3. Failure Criteria

    The following is a list of the failure criteria used during testing:

    Air Test

    t The specimen exceeds a specified maximum allowable air flow rate.

    Water Test

    Criteria as defined by the standard:

    t Failure occurs when water that penetrates through the frame or other portions of the test specimen and reaches a vertical plane inboard of the innermost projection of the specimen or when water reaches interior finishes or hardware.

    t Failure occurs whenever water penetrates through the perimeter frame of the test specimen.

    A.4. Test Equipment

    Test Wall

    The test wall consists of an aluminum plate supported by a steel frame. The plate is perforated at 462 mm vertically and 267 mm horizontally. At every second hole staggered vertically between columns there is a Spraying Systems Co. – 1/8GG-W 2.8W Fulljet Stainless Steel nozzle installed flush with the plate. Water is pumped through the nozzles with a Summit Type CC pump at the calibrated test pressure. The pressure is controlled by throttling the flow of water with gate valves and is measured by a liquid-filled dial water pressure gauge. The test wall is calibrated in accordance with ASTM standards E331 and E547 to a pressure of 159 kPa (23 psi).

    The specimen is set in a wood or fibreglass frame to create a chamber and is supported between 203 ± 51 mm from the test wall during the tests.

    Depressurization

    Depressurization of the test chamber is achieved through a 3” penetration in the test wall. Air is pumped through these penetrations by a model number R93150A GAST regenerative blower and is controlled by a model M12150C LENZE / AC TECH variable frequency drive. The fan moves air into or out of the chamber at a controlled rate to create the desired pressure differential across the specimen. The pressure differential is measured across the chamber wall with one of the following manometers:

    Air Test

    t Dwyer Solid Plastic Stationary Gage, model 201

    t Dwyer Solid Plastic Stationary Gage, model 202.5

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 9 OF 10

    t Meriam Inclined Tube Manometer, model 40HEX35WM

    Water Testing

    t Dwyer Solid Plastic Stationary Gage, model 244

    The volume of air flow is measured with a model Z50MW20-2 Meriam Laminar Flow Element.

    The pressure difference between the lateral groove and the exterior was measured with an Alnor AXD 610 manometer.

    A.5. Documentation

    Terminology

    In the report, water ingress paths and various forms of modifications are denoted in the following manner:

    Water Penetration Points – Points of water penetration on the indoor face of the test specimen, and any water penetration as defined by the standard.

    Adjustments – Adjustments are items on the test specimen where an installed component required realignment to properly interface with another component. These items are designated with an “A” sequence in modifications.

    Deficiencies – Deficiencies are items found on the test specimen that are not manufactured or installed per the manufacturer or project requirements. These items are designated with a “D” sequence in modifications.

    Modifications – Modifications are items that are performed on the test specimen that differ from the manufacturer or project requirements. These items are designated with an “M” sequence in modifications.

    Orientation References

    All references denoting orientation are taken as viewed when facing the test wall and the interior face of the specimen.

    A.6. Deviations from Test Standard

    Water Test

    The test is conducted in general conformance with the test standard with the following exception:

    t The barometric air pressure was not recorded, but was obtained afterwards from a nearby weather station in Pitt Meadows, BC.

  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    RDH Building Engineering Ltd.

    ..

    ..

    PAGE 10 OF 10

    APPENDIX B - TYPICAL DETAILS FOR LOG TEST WALL ASSEMBLY

    Typical log wall assembly showing pressure equalization cavity and dog-leg to the exterior (pressure equalization plugs removed). Note the 5/8” thru-bolt within the 1¼” oversized hole.

    Rendering of a typical log test wall assembly showing an unobstructed later groove which is vented to the exterior by and oversized tie-down rod chase and a diagonal hole exiting to the exterior side of the wall within the bottom log.