Port of Hastings: Flora and Fauna Assessment of Crown land ......Port of Hastings: Flora and Fauna...

100
© Biosis September 2012 – Leading ecology and heritage consultants 1 © Biosis September 2012 Leading ecology and heritage consultan ts 1 Port of Hastings: Flora and Fauna Assessment of Crown l and and BlueScope Steel property (within SUZ1) DRAFT REPORT Prepared for AECOM and GHD Joint Venture 2 March 2015 GHD Ref: AGH-CEP0-EV-REP

Transcript of Port of Hastings: Flora and Fauna Assessment of Crown land ......Port of Hastings: Flora and Fauna...

© Biosis September 2012 – Leading ecology and heritage consultants 1 © Biosis September 2012 – Leading ecology and heritage consultants 1

Port of Hastings: Flora and Fauna Assessment of Crown land and BlueScope Steel property (within SUZ1)

DRAFT REPORT

Prepared for AECOM and GHD Joint Venture

2 March 2015

GHD Ref: AGH-CEP0-EV-REP

In May 2016 the Special Minister of State asked Infrastructure Victoria to provide advice on the future capacity of Victoria’s commercial ports. Specifically, the Minister has asked for advice on when the need for a second container port is likely to arise and which variables may alter this timeline. The Minister has also asked for advice on where a second container port would ideally be located and under what conditions, including the suitability of, and barriers to investing in, sites at the Port of Hastings and the Bay West location.

In undertaking this task, Infrastructure Victoria reviewed work that was completed as part of the Port of Hastings development project before it was cancelled in 2014. This document forms part of the initial work undertaken for the proposed port development at Hastings. Infrastructure Victoria considers that much of the previous Hastings work, although preliminary in nature, is relevant and suitable for informing a strategic assessment. Therefore, Infrastructure Victoria has made the reports previously commissioned for the development project part of the evidence base on which Infrastructure Victoria will use in providing the Minister with advice.

The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this document are based on conditions encountered and information reviewed at the date of preparation of the document and for the purposes of the Port of Hastings Development Project.

Infrastructure Victoria and its consultants have used the information contained in these reports as an input but have not wholly relied on all the information presented in these reports.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting www.biosis.com.au Draft for discussion purposes I

Biosis Pty Ltd

This document is and shall remain the property of Biosis Pty Ltd. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of the Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited.

Disclaimer:

Biosis Pty Ltd has completed this assessment in accordance with the relevant federal, state and local legislation and current industry best practice. The company accepts no liability for any damages or loss incurred as a result of reliance placed upon the report content or for any purpose other than that for which it was intended.

Biosis offices

AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

Canberra

Floor 1, Unit 3, 38 Essington Street Mitchell ACT 2911

Phone: (02) 6241 2333 Fax: (03) 9646 9242 Email: [email protected]

NEW SOUTH WALES

Newcastle

39 Platt Street Waratah NSW 2298

Phone: (02) 4968 4901 Email: [email protected]

Sydney

Unit 14 17-27 Power Avenue Alexandria NSW 2015

Phone: (02) 9690 2777 Fax: (02) 9690 2577 Email: [email protected]

Wollongong

8 Tate Street Wollongong NSW 2500

Phone: (02) 4229 5222 Fax: (02) 4229 5500 Email: [email protected]

QUEENSLAND

Brisbane

Suite 4 First Floor, 72 Wickham Street Fortitude Valley QLD 4006

Phone: (07) 3831 7400 Fax: (07) 3831 7411 Email: [email protected]

VICTORIA

Ballarat

506 Macarthur Street Ballarat VIC 3350

Phone: (03) 5331 7000 Fax: (03) 5331 7033 Email: [email protected]

Melbourne (Head Office)

38 Bertie Street Port Melbourne VIC 3207

Phone: (03) 9646 9499 Fax: (03) 9646 9242 Email: [email protected]

Wangaratta

16 Templeton Street Wangaratta VIC 3677

Phone: (03) 5721 9453 Fax: (03) 5721 9454 Email: [email protected]

Document information

Report to: AECOM and GHD Joint Venture

Prepared by: Matt Dell, Ian Smales & Kirsty Kay

Biosis project no.: 19075

File name: 19075.PoH.FFA.DFT04.020315.docx

Citation: Biosis 2015. Port of Hastings: Flora and Fauna Assessment of Crown land and BlueScope Steel property (within SUZ1). Report for AECOM and GHD Joint Venture. Authors: Dell M, Smales I and Kay K. Biosis Pty Ltd, Melbourne. Project no. 19075.

Document control

Version Internal reviewer Date issued

Draft version 01 Ian Smales 21/01/15

Draft version 02 Kirsty Kay 30/01/15

Draft version 03 Kirsty Kay 27/02/15

Draft version 04 Kirsty Kay 02/03/15

Acknowledgements

Biosis acknowledges the contribution of the following people and organisations in undertaking this study:

Port of Hastings Development Authority: Rohan Henry

GHD/AECOM: David May, Megan Shaw and David Hyett

BlueScope Steel: Kristen Skewes

Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning for access to the Victorian Biodiversity Atlas and Native Vegetation Information Tools.

The following Biosis staff were involved in this project:

Dr Matthew Dell, Stephen Mueck, Ian Smales, Kirsty Kay, Dan Gilmore, Kailash Willis, Karina Salmon and Michael Goddard for field work

Marion Shadbolt and Dan Lim for research assistance

Sally Mitchell and Lachlan Milne for mapping.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes II

Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Project background ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Purpose and scope of this report ................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Biodiversity Legislation, Policy and Guidelines ........................................................................................ 5 2.1 International ..................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Convention) ........................... 5 2.1.1

2.2 Commonwealth ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) ............................................ 5 2.2.1

2.3 State Legislation ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Major Transport Project Facilitation Act 2009 (MTPF Act) ........................................................................... 6 2.3.1 Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 (FFG Act) ............................................................................................ 6 2.3.2 Catchment and Land Protection Act 1994 (CaLP Act) ................................................................................... 6 2.3.3 Planning and Environment Act 1987 (incl. Planning Schemes) ................................................................. 6 2.3.4 Victoria's Biodiversity Assessment Guidelines ........................................................................................... 7 2.3.5 State Advisory list of rare or threatened species ....................................................................................... 8 2.3.6

3. Methods ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Literature and database review ................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Definitions of significance ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Species and ecological communities......................................................................................................... 10 3.2.1

3.3 Likelihood of occurrence ............................................................................................................................................ 10 3.4 Site investigation........................................................................................................................................................... 11 Definition of native vegetation ................................................................................................................... 11 3.4.1

3.5 Vegetation Mapping..................................................................................................................................................... 11 3.6 Vegetation Quality Assessment ................................................................................................................................ 12 3.7 Targeted species surveys ............................................................................................................................................ 12 Flora .................................................................................................................................................................. 12 3.7.1 Fauna ................................................................................................................................................................ 13 3.7.2 Permits ............................................................................................................................................................. 15 3.7.3

3.8 Limitations ..................................................................................................................................................................... 15 4. Results ............................................................................................................................................................ 17 4.1 Landscape context ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 4.2 Vegetation & fauna habitat ........................................................................................................................................ 18 4.3 Significant species and ecological communities ................................................................................................... 29 EPBC Act and FFG Act listed species .......................................................................................................... 29 4.3.1 Targeted survey results ................................................................................................................................ 31 4.3.2

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes III

EPBC Act listed ecological communities ................................................................................................... 33 4.3.3 FFG Act listed community ............................................................................................................................ 34 4.3.4

4.4 Habitat hectares ........................................................................................................................................................... 35 4.5 Other ecological values ............................................................................................................................................... 37 Western Port Ramsar wetland .................................................................................................................... 37 4.5.1 Locally or regionally significant flora species .......................................................................................... 37 4.5.2 NaturePrint and Strategic Biodiversity Score .......................................................................................... 38 4.5.3

4.6 Implications under State and Commonwealth Legislation ................................................................................. 39 EPBC Act ........................................................................................................................................................... 39 4.6.1 FFG Act ............................................................................................................................................................. 39 4.6.2 CaLP Act ........................................................................................................................................................... 39 4.6.3 Planning and Environment Act 1987 (incl. Planning Schemes) .............................................................. 40 4.6.4 State Advisory list of rare or threatened species .................................................................................... 40 4.6.5

5. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................................... 41 5.1 Key biodiversity values ................................................................................................................................................ 41 5.2 Avoidance and minimisation of biodiversity impacts .......................................................................................... 41 5.3 Considerations for project design ............................................................................................................................ 42 5.4 Further surveys ............................................................................................................................................................. 42 References ............................................................................................................................................................. 43 Appendix A. Figures ............................................................................................................................................. 46 Appendix B. Flora ................................................................................................................................................. 50 Appendix C. Fauna ............................................................................................................................................... 70 Appendix D. Photos .............................................................................................................................................. 85 Appendix E. Ecology Glossary ............................................................................................................................. 86

List of Tables

Table 1: Criteria for determining significance of species & ecological communities ................................... 10 Table 2: Summary of vegetation and habitat types within the study area ................................................... 19 Table 3: Summary of listed flora and fauna species most likely to occur in the study area ...................... 29 Table 4: Habitat hectares of native vegetation within the study area ........................................................... 36

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 1

Executive Summary

Biosis Pty Ltd was appointed by AECOM/GHD Joint Venture on behalf of the Port of Hastings Development Authority (the Authority) to undertake a flora and fauna assessment of land within BlueScope Steel and areas of Crown land within the Hastings Special Use Zone (SUZ1) for the Port of Hastings Development Project (the Project). This information is required to understand the condition, presence and extent of terrestrial biodiversity values within the study area to inform port design decisions and support future impact assessments and approvals.

The study area contains a range of ecological values on land that is largely occupied by native vegetation of varying quality. It is included within the Western Port Biosphere Reserve and the Western Port Ramsar Wetland site (in part). The Ramsar wetland includes permanent and semi-permanent saline wetlands, including intertidal mud and sand flats, and areas of saltmarsh and mangroves. The biosphere reserve was declared on the basis that it contains significant natural values including internationally important wetlands as well as nationally significant values.

Key ecological values

Key ecological values identified within the study area are as follows:

approximately 330 ha of native vegetation including large, high quality, intact patches of woodland, and coastal EVCs, scattered remant trees, and regionally significant coastal-inland ecosystem gradients

shallow intertidal habitats, mangroves, saltmarsh and adjacent coastal land which form a significant component of the Western Port Ramsar wetland

approximately 43.4 ha of the EPBC Act listed ecological community: Subtropical and Temperate Coastal Saltmarsh and approximately 3 ha of the EPBC Act listed community: Seasonal Herbaceous Wetland (Freshwater) of the Temperate Lowland Plains

a population of the EPBC Act listed flora species River Swamp Wallaby-grass (Amphibromus fluitans), twelve State Advisory List species and three FFG Act listed fauna species

potential presence of additional EPBC Act, State Advisory List and FFG Act listed species and suitable habitats for them.

High value areas

Large patches of contiguous native vegetation generally provide the highest flora and fauna values. Loss or fragmentation of such areas can be detrimental to the species and ecosystems they support. Relevant areas within the study area include:

Crown land containing native heathy or grassy woodland and the coastal zone supporting saltmarsh and mangrove shrublands which form part of the Western Port Ramsar wetland.

large intact areas of native woodland and coastal vegetation within the eastern part of the BlueScope Steel property.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 2

Considerations for project design

Planning for project infrastructure layout from an ecological perspective (with respect to State and Commonwealth biodiversity legislation and policies) should give consideration to:

design options which avoid or minimise direct or indirect impacts on the Western Port Ramsar site including its foreshore habitats

design options that avoid or minimise removal of remnant native vegetation and scattered native trees, particularly larger areas of intact vegetation such as those within BlueScope Steel land, by locating infrastructure in previously cleared land or predominantly non-native vegetation (e.g. existing transport corridors, urban areas and non-native agricultural areas)

design options that avoid fragmentation of native vegetation patches, and avoid severance of important vegetation and habitat linkages

the potential challenges and costs associated with locating and securing sufficient offsets for biodiversity assets that cannot be protected on-site (as required to comply with relevant State and Commonwealth offset policies).

Further survey

The surveys reported here were undertaken in a season not suitable for detection of all target species. Further surveys are recommended for detection of Southern Toadlet in autumn, Orange-bellied Parrot between April and September inclusive and Green-striped Greenhood during August to early September.

The survey reported here is one of a number of investigations of biodiversity values planned to be undertaken for the Project. Other investigations yet to be undertaken may provide information that further refines understanding of aspects covered by this report.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 3

1. Introduction

1.1 Project background

The Victorian Government has identified the Port of Hastings as a key area for port expansion.

An expanded Port of Hastings would increase capacity and competition in the container ports sector servicing Melbourne and Victoria helping to manage the expected growth in container trade.

The Port of Hastings Development Authority (the Authority) and its board were established in January 2012 under the Transport Integration Act 2010. The primary objectives of the Authority are to:

manage and operate the Port of Hastings, and

facilitate the development of the Port of Hastings as a viable alternative to the Port of Melbourne as a container port to increase capacity and competition in the container ports sector to accommodate future growth in trade, consistent with the vision statement and the transport system objectives.

Over the next three to four years, the Authority will be working to develop a business case for an expanded Port of Hastings and undertake comprehensive environmental assessment. This business case will include:

preferred project design/scope (including transport connections)

necessary environmental approvals (including impact assessment)

preferred governance and delivery strategy.

In May 2014, the Port of Hastings Development Project (the Project) was declared a 'Major Transport Project' under the Major Transport Project Facilitation Act 2009 (MTPF Act).

In July 2014, the then Minister for Ports, Mr David Hodgett, formally appointed the Authority as the Project Proponent under the MTPF Act.

1.2 Purpose and scope of this report

The purpose of this report is to present an assessment of the condition, presence and extent of terrestrial biodiversity values in BlueScope Steel and coastal Crown land within SUZ1, including threatened species. The assessment has been developed to:

understand the significance of terrestrial and coastal biodiversity in accordance with State and Federal biodiversity legislation

enable port design decisions to be informed by an understanding of terrestrial biodiversity values, their significance and location across the landscape

obtain further information for potential inclusion in the EPBC referral and Project Proposal

collect information to inform future impact assessments that will be carried out once the reference design has been developed.

The scope of this assessment is to:

review the results of a desktop flora and fauna report prepared by Biosis (2014b)

undertake mapping at 1:5,000 scale of Ecological Vegetation Classes, remnant scattered trees, EPBC Act listed ecological communities and FFG Act listed communities

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 4

assess the condition of native vegetation

undertake targeted surveys and habitat evaluation for threatened flora and fauna species (EPBC Act and FFG Act) that were determined in the desktop of having at least a medium likelihood of presence

identify any other relevant ecological values.

The study area for this assessment is shown in Appendix A - Figure A1 and is confined within the Hastings SUZ1 component of the port landside development. Some areas within BlueScope and Crown land were not available to be assessed in the present investigation and it is recommended that they are included in any subsequent assessment(s). The operational area of BlueScope was not surveyed due to safety access requirements. The Gordon Rolfe Bushland Reserve, Yaringa, was assessed for flora but fauna surveys were not possible due to a feral animal control program at the time of survey.

The properties included in the scope of works for the present investigation cover a portion of the SUZ1. The entire SUZ1 area includes various land parcels under different tenures and land management from those covered here. Future investigations are proposed to investigate biodiversity values of these additional land parcels within SUZ1.

The scope for the present investigations excluded marine (refer Figure A1) and freshwater environments, other than consideration of vegetation and frogs of freshwater habitats.

Results of the assessment are presented variously in Appendices B (Flora), C (Fauna) and D (Photos). A glossary of terms is provided in Appendix E.

The contents of this document reflect the current position on the subject matter held by Biosis. It is provided for discussion or information purposes and is intended to be a guide only. The contents of this document should not be relied upon as representing the final position of Biosis on the subject matter, unless stated otherwise. Any views expressed by Biosis in this document may change as a consequence of Biosis undertaking further technical studies or specifications, or legislative, or procedure and regulatory developments. Any figures provided are indicative only and may be subject to change.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 5

2. Biodiversity Legislation, Policy and Guidelines

This section provides a summary of relevant biodiversity legislation and government policies and guidelines. Legislation and policy are not described in detail and guidance provided here does not constitute legal advice. Prescriptions and guidance for flora and fauna survey and assessment methods are provided in a number of policies associated with relevant legislation.

Generally, biodiversity legislation aims to avoid or minimise impacts on import biodiversity values. In particular lists of rare or threatened species and ecological communities are provided with the aim of avoiding further fragmentation or loss of these values. The approvals process requires demonstation of efforts to optimise the design of developments to minimise these environmental impacts. Where impacts on biodiversity are unavoidable following an iterative design optimisation process, offsets may be sought to adequately compensate for residual adverse impacts. Both Commonwealth and State systems provide calculators to be used to determine offset size, type and location of offsets.

Offsets can only be secured however where they are available, and it is important to note that not in every case the required equivalent offsets for clearance of habitats or species are available. This is particularly relevant for large areas of listed threatened native vegetation communities or extensive areas of high quality habitat for threatened species, thus potentially providing a challenge to obtaining permission to remove those values from an area.

2.1 International

Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Convention) 2.1.1

Australia became a signatory to the Ramsar Convention in 1974 and commited to designating sites for inclusion in the List of Wetlands of International Importance. A large portion of Western Port was designated in 1982. Australia has a number of obligations pertinent to the management of wetlands of international importance and is expected to manage Ramsar wetlands so as to maintain their ecological character, remain informed of any changes to their character, and notify the Ramsar Secretariat of any changes at the earliest opportunity.

National Guidelines for Ramsar Wetlands are currently being developed by the Department of Environment in consultation with the states and territories. The aim of the guidelines is to facilitate improved management of Ramsar sites in line with Australia's commitments under the Ramsar Convention and responsibilities under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (below).

2.2 Commonwealth

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) 2.2.1

The aim of the EPBC Act is to provide a legal framework to protect nationally and internationally important flora, fauna and ecological communities. These values are defined as matters of national environmental significance (MNES). The EPBC Act applies to developments and associated activities that have the potential to significantly impact MNES protected under the Act including Ramsar wetlands of international importance, nationally threatened species and communities and migratory species. The EPBC Act also relates to ations that affect Commonwealth land (DEWHA 2010). Actions that may have a 'significant impact' on MNES or

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 6

Commonwealth land are subject to approval by the Australian Government Minister for the Environment (DEWHA 2009a). Where significant impacts are deemed likely, measures to avoide and mitigation those impacts are required. As a final measure, offsets can be deemed to compensate for the residual adverse impacts of an action on the environment. The suitability of a proposed offset is considered as part of the decision to approve or not approve a proposed action under the EPBC Act.

The Authority is concurrently seeking agreement to accredit the assessment process under the MTPF Act for assessment of the impacts to MNES as listed under the EPBC Act.

2.3 State Legislation

Major Transport Project Facilitation Act 2009 (MTPF Act) 2.3.1

The Project has been declared under the MTPF Act. The Authority is preparing a Project Proposal as part of the decision-making and approval process under the MTPF Act to inform a decision by the Minister for Planning on the appropriate assessment pathway for the project. The primary State approvals required for the project, and that are capable of being granted under the MTPF Act, are called Applicable Approvals. At this stage of the Project development, the Applicable Approvals relevant to biodiversity that may be sought for the Project under the MTPF Act include:

consent under the Coastal Management Act 1995

planning scheme amendment under the Planning and Environment Act 1987

licence to take and use water, and works on waterways licence under the Water Act 1989

consent under the Conservation, Forest and Lands Act 1987.

Permits under the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 and the Wildlife Act 1975 would be sought following the MTPF Act approval process as these require a more detailed level of design.

Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 (FFG Act) 2.3.2

The FFG Act is the key piece of Victorian legislation for the conservation of threatened species and communities and for the management of potentially threatening processes. Under the FFG Act a permit is required from the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) to 'take' protected flora species from public land, which in this case would apply to the Crown land parcels. A permit is generally not required for removal of protected flora from private land.

Catchment and Land Protection Act 1994 (CaLP Act) 2.3.3

The CaLP Act identifies and classifies certain species as noxious weeds or pest animals, and provides a system of controls on noxious species.

The land owner must take all reasonable steps to eradicate regionally prohibited weeds, prevent the growth and spread of regionally controlled weeds, and prevent the spread of and as far as possible eradicate established pest animals. The State is responsible for eradicating State prohibited weeds from all land in Victoria.

Planning and Environment Act 1987 (incl. Planning Schemes) 2.3.4

The Planning and Environment Act 1987 controls the planning and development of land in Victoria, and provides for the development of planning schemes for all municipalities. This Act would be addressed under Applicable Approvals of the MTPF Act.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 7

Reforms to the native vegetation permitted clearing regulations were gazetted on 20 December 2013 through planning scheme amendment VC105. The reforms made changes to the Victoria Planning Provisions including the State Planning Policy Framework (SPPF), Clause 52.16 and 52.17 of all planning scheme within Victoria and introduced the Permitted clearing of native vegetation: Biodiversity Assessment Guidelines (DEPI 2013b).

Of particular relevance to the Project are controls relating to the removal, destruction or lopping of native vegetation contained within the Planning Scheme, including permit requirements. The Scheme defines ‘native vegetation’ as 'plants that are indigenous to Victoria, including trees, shrubs, herbs and grasses'. It is an objective of Clause 12.01-2 of the SPPF (Native Vegetation Management) that permitted clearing of native vegetation results in no net loss in the contribution made by native vegetation to Victoria’s biodiversity. For more information on these reforms refer to http://www.depi.vic.gov.au/environment-and-wildlife/biodiversity/native-vegetation.

Overlays in the planning scheme relevant to the study area and final development layout should also be reviewed to assist in the determination of whether a permit to remove native vegetation is required.

Victoria's Biodiversity Assessment Guidelines 2.3.5

The Guidelines are incorporated into the Victoria Planning Provisions and all planning schemes in Victoria (DEPI 2013b). The purpose of the Guidelines is to guide how impacts to biodiversity should be considered when assessing a permit application to remove, destroy or lop native vegetation.

The Guidelines describe the following objective for permitted clearing of native vegetation in Victoria:

'No net loss in the contribution made by native vegetation to Victoria's biodiversity'.

This objective is to be achieved through Victoria's planning system using a risk-based approach that relies on strategic planning and the permit and offset system. The key strategies for achieving no net loss at the permit level are:

avoiding the removal of native vegetation that makes a significant contribution to Victoria's biodiversity

minimising impacts to Victoria's biodiversity from the removal of native vegetation

where native vegetation is permitted to be removed, ensuring it is offset in a manner that makes a contribution to Victoria's biodiversity that is equivalent to the contribution made by the native vegetation to be removed.

Under the Guidelines, there are three risk-based pathways for assessing an application for a permit to remove native vegetation: low, moderate and high. A planning application for removal of native vegetation must meet the requirements of, and be assessed in, the appropriate risk pathway. Given the scale of the Project and requirements for native vegetation removal, it is likely to be assessed under the high risk-based pathway.

Consideration to the design and layout of the Project infrastructure would be required to avoid and minimise clearance of native vegetation and scattered trees as far as possible. Offsets for permitted native vegetation clearance would be required and can be calculated using the DELWP Native Vegetation Information Management (NVIM) system online tool once a development footprint is known. Various options can be sumitted throught the NVIM tool to establish the layout which results in the lowest impacts on biodiversity values.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 8

State Advisory list of rare or threatened species 2.3.6

The State Advisory Lists (e.g. DEPI 2013a, DEPI 2013d) are intended to be used in a range of planning processes, although there are no direct legal requirements or consequences that flow from inclusion of a species in advisory lists. Some species in these advisory lists are also listed as threatened under the FFG Act.

To support decision making under the Guidelines, DELWP has produced models for Victoria describing the extent of habitat for most listed rare or threatened species. These models are called 'habitat importance models' and they assign a 'habitat importance score' to a location based on its importance in the landscape as habitat for a particular rare or threatened species relative to other suitable habitat for the species elsewhere in the State (DEPI 2013b).

Under the Guidelines, these models form the basis for determining the impact of potential native vegetation clearing on rare and threatened species where the proposal is considered to be on the moderate or high risk-based application pathways. The habitat importance scores are used to calculate the type and extent of biodiversity offsets required for native vegetation removal that impacts on individual rare or threatened species habitat for moderate or high risk application pathways.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 9

3. Methods

3.1 Literature and database review

Information about flora and fauna was obtained from relevant public databases for the study area and from within 5 km of the study area (the ‘local area’). These data provide an indication of species and ecosystems that may exist within the study area. Records from the following databases were collated and reviewed:

Flora Information System which includes records from the Victorian Biodiversity Atlas ‘VBA_FLORA25, FLORA100 & FLORA Restricted’ August 2012 © The State of Victoria, DEPI (the contribution of the Royal Botanical Gardens Melbourne to the database is acknowledged)

Victorian Biodiversity Atlas ‘VBA_FAUNA25, FAUNA100 & FAUNA Restricted’ August 2012 © The State of Victoria

DELWP Biodiversity Interactive Map (BIM)

BirdLife Australia, the New Atlas of Australian Birds 1998–2012 (BA)

Protected Matters Search Tool of the Australian Government Department of the Environment for MNES under the EPBC Act.

Other sources of biodiversity information:

DELWP Native Vegetation Information Management (NVIM) system and BIM

DELWP NaturePrint; accessed through the BIM

DELWP Arthur Rylah Institute.

The following studies and consultant reports relating to the study area were reviewed in preparation of this report. The main focus in the review of these documents was to validate EVC distribution for the study area and to determine any implications of threatened species survey results:

AECOM 2013. Western Port Highway Planning Study – Ballarto Road to Hodgins Road: Desktop Flora and Fauna Assessment. Report to VicRoads. Author: White, C. AECOM, Melbourne. Job No. 60308273.

Biosis 2014a. Port of Hastings Development Authority: Flora and fauna assessment for the geophysical and geotechnical surveys. Report to Port of Hastings Development Authority. Authors: Mueck S. and Smales I. Biosis Pty Ltd, Melbourne. Project no. 17228

Biosis 2014b. Port of Hastings: SUZ1 and Land Transport Corridor, Desktop Flora and Fauna Assessment. Report for AECOM and GHD Joint Venture. Authors: Dell M, Kay K and Gilmore D – Biosis; Harrow, S, Lind P. - GHD. Biosis Pty Ltd, Melbourne. Project no. 18568.

Biosis Research 2012. Scoping framework for the terrestrial ecological assessment of the expansion of the Port of Hastings. Report to Major Projects Victoria. Author: Venosta, M. Biosis Research, Melbourne. Matter No. 14062.

Biosis Research 2011. Port of Hastings Stage 1 Investigation Area: Threatened flora and fauna survey and habitat hectare assessment. Report to Port of Melbourne Corporation. Authors: Venosta, M., Mueck, S. and Bloink, C. Biosis Research Pty Ltd, Melbourne. Matter No. 11173.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 10

Biosis Research 2009. Flora and fauna assessment of Port of Hastings Stage One Investigation area, Victoria. Report to AECOM Pty Ltd. Authors: Venosta, M., Mueck, S. and Bloink, C. Biosis Research Pty Ltd, Melbourne. Project no. 7540 & 7930.

DEPI 2014. Sub-regional Species Strategy for the Southern Brown Bandicoot. Victorian Government Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Melbourne.

GHD 2013. Port of Hastings Development Authority, Port Container Expansion Project: Preliminary Ecological Assessment. Report to Port of Hastings Development Authority. Job No. 31/29838/06.

Legg 2006. Flora and Fauna Survey and Management Prescriptions for Crib Point Stony Point Foreshore, Crib Point, October, 2005 to October, 2006. Report to Crib Point Stony Point Foreshore Committee of Management Inc. Author: Legg, M. Mal’s Environmental and Ecological Services.

A catalogue of literature relating to the Western Port Biosphere Project was updated by Mungere (2008) which includes ecological studies and other literature (1800 references) (MPWPBRF 2014). A full list of literature used in preparation of this report is contained in the references section.

3.2 Definitions of significance

Species and ecological communities 3.2.1

The significance of a species or community is determined by its listing as rare or threatened under Commonwealth or State legislation / policy. The sources for categories of significance of species and communities are summarised below in Table 1.

Table 1: Criteria for determining significance of species & ecological communities

Significance

National Listed as threatened (critically endangered, endangered, vulnerable or conservation dependent) under the EPBC Act and/or a component of a Ramsar wetland.

State Listed as threatened (critically endangered, endangered, vulnerable) or rare for flora species, in Victoria on a State Advisory List (DEPI 2013a, DEPI 2013d) Listed as threatened under the FFG Act.

Fauna species listed on State Advisory lists as near threatened or data deficient are listed in Appendix B, however in accordance with advice from DELWP these fauna species are not considered to be at the same level of risk as higher categories of threat. These species are generally not discussed in detail in this report.

3.3 Likelihood of occurrence

The likelihood of occurrence is a broad categorisation used by Biosis to indicate the potential for a species to occur within the study area. It implies the relative value of a site for a particular species. The categorisation is based on documentary evidence for the presence of relevant species; the existence of suitable habitat within the study area; and, experience, particularly for species that are cryptic and have never been recorded in the study area or have not been recorded for a substantial period. Account is taken of the rigour, and effort of surveys for particular taxa and the time that has elapsed since field investigations were undertaken.

Likelihood of occurrence is assessed only for species listed under the EPBC Act or listed as threatened under the FFG Act (hereafter referred to as 'listed species'). The habitat value for species listed on the State Advisory

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 11

Lists is calculated by the Habitat Importance Modelling produced by the then DEPI (2013b). Where State Advisory List species are recorded in the study area this is noted in Appendix B1.1 and Appendix B2.1.

The likelihood of listed species occurring within the study area is ranked as negligible, low, medium or high.

Species which have medium or high likelihood of occurrence are given further consideration in this report.

3.4 Site investigation

Definition of native vegetation 3.4.1

Native vegetation is defined in the Victoria Planning Provisions as 'plants that are indigenous to Victoria, including trees, shrubs, herbs and grasses'. Native vegetation is classified by Victoria's Biodiversity Assessment Guidelines into two categories (DEPI 2013b):

A remnant patch of native vegetation (measured in hectares) is either:

– An area of native vegetation, with or without trees, where at least 25 percent of the total perennial understorey cover is native plants.

– An area with three or more indigenous canopy trees where the tree canopy cover is at least 20 percent.

Remnant patch vegetation is classified into ecological vegetation classes (EVCs). An EVC contains one or more floristic (plant) communities, and represents a grouping of broadly similar environments. Definitions of EVCs and benchmarks (condition against which vegetation quality at the site can be compared) are determined by DELWP.

A scattered tree is defined as (extent measured by number of trees):

– An indigenous canopy tree that does not form part of a remnant patch of native vegetation.

A canopy tree is a mature tree that is greater than three metres in height and is normally found in the upper layer of a vegetation type. Ecological Vegetation Class descriptions provide a list of the typical canopy species. A condition score and extent is applied to each scattered tree based on information provided by DELWP’s online Native Vegetation Information Management (NVIM) system.

Species nomenclature for flora follows the Victorian Flora Information System (FIS). The FIS and the Victorian Fauna Database (VFD) are fully-functional geographically-registered, relational databases of distribution and descriptive data on Victorian plants and animals. Together they contain over five million records of over 8000 species, sub-species, varieties, forms, hybrids and undescribed taxa of plants and animals from over 900,000 survey or collection sites (Viridans 2015).

3.5 Vegetation Mapping

The study area boundaries for the project were provided by the Authority and are shown in Figure A1.

Mapping reviewed for this assessment include:

EVC mapping within Mornington Peninsula Shire, available at 1:10 000 scale (Sinclair et al. 2006)

Victorian Saltmarsh Study (Boon et al. 2011), which entailed detailed mapping of saltmarsh communities and provides accurate information about the extent of intertidal EVCs

EVC mapping within BlueScope Steel (Biosis 2014b) available at 1:10 000 scale

DEPI modeled 2005 EVCs generally available at 1:25 000 scale (DELWP 2015).

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 12

Updated vegetation mapping was conducted in the field using hand-held (uncorrected) GPS units (WGS84) and aerial photo interpretation. The locations of EPBC Act listed species recorded during the current assessment are shown in Figure A2. The accuracy of this mapping is therefore subject to the accuracy of the GPS units (generally ± 7 metres) and dependent on the limitations of aerial photo rectification and registration.

Mapping for the report has been produced using a Geographic Information System (GIS). Electronic GIS files which contain our flora and fauna spatial data are available to incorporate into design concept plans. However this mapping may not be sufficiently precise for detailed design purposes.

3.6 Vegetation Quality Assessment

A Vegetation Quality Assessment was undertaken for all remnant patch native vegetation identified in the study area (Appendix A2 and Section 4.4). This assessment is consistent with the Habitat hectare methodology (DSE 2004) and the Biodiversity Assessment Guidelines (DEPI 2013b). The method involves the assessment of a number of site-based habitat and landscape components agains a pre-determined 'benchmark' relevant to the vegetation type being assessed.

A Habitat Zone is a discrete area of native vegetation consisting of a single vegetation type (EVC) with an assumed similar averaged quality. This is the base spatial unit for conducting a habitat hectare assessment. Habitat Zones are illustrated on Figure A2.

For the purposes of this assessment the limit of the resolution for the Habitat hectare assessment process is taken to be 0.001 Habitat hectares (Hha). That is, if native vegetation is present with sufficient cover but its condition and extent would not result in the identification of at least 0.001 Habitat hectares then that vegetation will not be mapped or assessed as a separate habitat zone.

Where relevant, notes were made on specific issues such as noxious weed infestations, evidence of management works, current grazing impacts and the regeneration capacity of the vegetation.

3.7 Targeted species surveys

Flora 3.7.1

Targeted flora surveys were undertaken on 15, 16, 20–24, 29–31 October and 26–28 November 2014. Survey efforts focused on areas of native vegetation as determined by botanists who carried out the initial inspection. These areas were identified as having the highest habitat suitability for target threatened flora species. For each survey, the entire area was traversed on foot by two botanists. Survey lines were spaced 10 m apart and generally undertaken in an east-west orientation and the locations of any threatened species were recorded using a hand-held GPS unit (+/- 7 m accuracy). A brief description of the habitat was documented for areas found to be containing a threatened species.

Within vegetated portions of the study area grassy and heathy woodlands as well as freshwater wetlands were surveyed. Following surveys of vegetated areas, nearby farmland and non-operational areas of BlueScope were also searched for threatened flora. Some areas of non-native vegetation were surveyed if they were already known to contain threatened species. For example, ephemeral wetlands on farmland were targeted for the presence of River Swamp Wallaby-grass (Amphibromus fluitans).

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 13

Investigations were undertaken with the following species as primary targets, listed in order of threat significnace:

Matted Flax-lily Dianella amoena - EPBC Act listed as endangered. FFG Act listed

Swamp Everlasting Xerochrysum palustre - EPBC Act listed as vulnerable. FFG Act listed

River Swamp Wallaby-grass Amphibromus fluitans - EPBC Act listed as vulnerable

Swamp Fireweed Senecio psilocarpus - EPBC Act listed as vulnerable

Purple Diuris Diuris punctata var. punctata - FFG Act listed.

Biosis undertook a flora survey along the Esso Longford to Hastings pipeline easement in the north-west of the BlueScope Steel property in late spring 2013. No significant flora species additional to those recorded during the present survey were detected (Biosis 2013a).

The locations of State Advisory Listed species were not recorded as the planning requirements in relation to these species are restricted to the Biodiversity Assessment Guidelines and associated modelled data. However, occurrences of these species and their significance are recorded in Appendix B for reference.

Fauna 3.7.2

Targeted fauna surveys were undertaken on 23 October; 10–14 and 19–21 November; and 11 December 2014. Nocturnal surveys for frogs were undertaken on the nights of 12 and 13 November and 15 December. On each day and night two zoologists were on site.

Active searching and observation to detect fauna was carried out and all species of fauna detected during investigations of the site were recorded.

Investigations were undertaken with the following species as primary targets and specific survey methods used for particular species are detailed below. Species are listed in order of threat significance:

Southern Brown Bandicoot Isoodon obesulus - EPBC Act listed as endangered, FFG Act listed, DEPI (2013a) near threatened

Growling Grass Frog Litoria raniformis- EPBC Act listed as vulnerable, FFG Act listed, DEPI (2013a) endangered

New Holland Mouse Pseudomys novaehollandiae - EPBC Act listed as vulnerable, FFG Act listed, DEPI (2013a) vulnerable

Lace Monitor Varanus varius- DEPI (2013a) endangered

Swamp Skink Lissolepis coventryi - FFG Act listed, DEPI (2013a) vulnerable

White-footed Dunnart Sminthopsis leucopus - FFG Act listed, DEPI (2013a) near threatened

Glossy Grass Skink Pseudemoia rawlinsoni - DEPI (2013a) near threatened

Latham's Snipe Gallinago hardwickii- EPBC Act listed as migratory, DEPI (2013a) near threatened.

A variety of survey techniques were used for their potential to detect different suites of species and for their capacity to detect particular species by more than one method.

Surveys targeted at detection of mammals, including species too large to enter Elliott traps, were undertaken using motion- and infra-red-sensitive remote cameras within areas identified as potentially suitable habitat for relevant species. Standard small bait was used as an attractant set in a bait-station on which each camera was focussed. A total of 20 cameras were deployed for between 20 and 22 days from 19 November to 11 December 2014. Cameras were deployed for a total of 410 camera-days/nights. All photographs were

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 14

viewed post-fieldwork to identify fauna recorded. Camera locations were selected with a view to the suitability of habitats for key species and to survey different vegetation communities. Locations of remote cameras are shown in Figure A3a. Cameras were deployed in the following EVCs:

Estuarine Scrub: camera 1

Damp Heathy Woodland: cameras 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19

Damp Heathland: cameras 6, 7, 9, 10

Grassy Woodland: cameras 11, 16, 17, 18, 20

Damp Sands Herb-rich Woodland: cameras 12, 14

Heathy Woodland: cameras 13, 15.

Surveys for threatened small mammals and skinks were carried out with nocturnal and diurnal deployment of Elliott traps. Trapping locations were selected with a view to the suitability of habitats for key species and to survey different vegetation communities and gradients through differing vegetation communities. Traps were baited with standard small mammal bait (targeting small mammals) or with sardines (targeting skinks). In total, trapping was carried out for 440 trap-days/nights from 10–14 November 2014 (inclusive). Traps were set out in transects of 25 traps. Locations of trap transects are shown in Figure A3b and were in the following EVCs:

Damp Heathland transitioning into Damp Heathy Woodland: mammal trapline 1 (northern-most trapline)

Estuarine Scrub transitioning into Damp Heathy Woodland: mammal trapline 2 (south of trapline 1)

Grassy Woodland: mammal trapline 3 (north and south of Whitney's Rd)

Damp Sands Herb-rich Woodland transitioning into Heathy Woodland and Grassy Woodland: mammal trapline 4 (southern-most trapline)

Coastal Saltmarsh (at ecotone dominated by Melaleuca): skink traplines 5 and 6 (shown as dashed pale blue in Figure A3b.

Observational surveys for threatened reptiles entailed diurnal observational searches within Swamp Scrub, other damp terrestrial habitats and within woodland habitats.

Surveys for Growling Grass Frog entailed initial evaluation of freshwater wetlands for their suitability as habitat for the species. Eighteen wetlands were evaluated. Ten wetlands were considered to offer potential habitat (DEPI 2013c) and were then subject to nocturnal surveys entailing listening for characteristic calls of the species and the use of call playback and spotlight investigations. Locations of all wetlands evaluated and surveyed for Growling Grass Frogs are shown in Figure A3b. Surveys for this species were undertaken to comply with guidelines under a species-specific Commonwealth EPBC Act policy.

Biosis undertook fauna survey along the Esso Longford to Hastings pipeline easement in the north-west of the BlueScope Steel property in late spring 2013. Seven remote cameras and 60 Elliott traps were deployed to detect small mammals. The survey regime for both techniques was the same as that used in the current survey. No fauna species additional to those recorded during the present survey were detected (Biosis 2013a).

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 15

Permits 3.7.3

Biosis undertakes flora and fauna assessments under the following permits and approvals:

Research Permit/Management Authorisation and Permit to Take Protected Flora & Protected Fish issued by the Department of Environment and Primary Industries under the Wildlife Act 1975, Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 and National Parks Act 1975 (Permit number 10006240, expiry date 9 May 2015)

Approvals 04.12 and 14.12 from the Wildlife and Small Institutions Animal Ethics Committee

3.8 Limitations

Ecological surveys provide a sampling of flora and fauna at a given time and season. There are a number of reasons why not all species that might be present will be detected at a site during survey, such as low abundance, patchy distribution, species dormancy, seasonal conditions, and migration and breeding behaviours. In many cases these factors do not present a significant limitation to assessing the overall biodiversity values of a site.

For individual species assessments, the disturbance history of the vegetation is given particular consideration. Many flora species may be present as underground storage organs or as viable seed in the soil. For such species, the disturbance regime of a site is typically a determining factor for detecting presence using standard survey methods e.g. targeted surveys for flowering material. Disturbance may include frequency and duration of inundation, frequency and intensity of fire, land clearing history, effects of domestic stock and fauna activity. Orchids in particular have irregular annual growth and flowering patterns which vary considerably in response to site disturbance, particularly fire. Success in detecting species varies between and within flowering seasons and according to factors such as time since fire and amount of rainfall leading into spring. For some species, competition with other plants in long-unburnt areas may prevent annual growth from underground tubers. This has been recorded in Dense Leek-orchid Prasophyllum spicatum which is capable of producing flowers in the absence of fire although dense understorey growth in heathy vegetation can inhibit flowering (Duncan 2010). In other Prasophyllum species, a more direct requirement for fire seems apparent, to stimulate abundant annual growth and flowering in the one or two seasons that follow. Such species may the present only as underground storage organs, awaiting fire for several decades. As such, the influence of disturbance history is assessed on a species by species basis. The shrub and woodland vegetation within most areas assessed showed little evidence of having been burnt in the last 20 years. Understorey vegetation was quite dense in many areas as a result. Grassy Woodland vegetation had a high cover of shrubs (particularly Hedge Wattle Acacia paradoxa) compared with what is typically expected in more frequently burnt examples elsewhere.

Some threatened fauna species that may utilise the site occur seasonally or are most readily detected at times of the year other than the spring/early summer period in which the present investigations were carried out. These include Orange-bellied Parrot Neophema chrysogaster, which is routinely not present on the Australian mainland at this time of year, and Southern Toadlet Pseudophryne semimarmorata, which is cryptic and best detected in autumn when males call. Future surveys for such species would be required during the appropriate seasons. Assessments in this report of the likelihood of occurrence for such species are preliminary and subject to change following future surveys.

The present investigation for fauna did not include birds that are wholly or substantially reliant on the waters of Western Port. We recognize that many of such species may utilize the terrestrial coastal environments included within the current study area and that the ecologies of such species are not exclusively ‘marine’ or ‘terrestrial’. However, as this suite of birds is proposed to be investigated separately

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 16

(Biosis 2014c), survey for coastal and marine birds was not included in the current project and such species included in this report represent incidental observations only.

A bat survey was not undertaken as the present investigation was primarily focused on significant species and the study area is not considered likely to be inhabited by any threatened microbats. A survey for bats is proposed to be included in future fauna survey across the wider SUZ1 area.

Targeted investigations of freshwater environments, other than those for frogs, were not part of the scope of present investigations by Biosis.

Database records of flora and fauna species are vetted for authenticity by authorities responsible for their management. For the purposes of this assessment, the species identities and metadata associated with them are accepted at face value. Some of these records are historic but a paucity of recent records does not necessarily reflect the current local status of the species in question. It may simply be the result of a lack of recent survey for the species. This appears to be the case especially within the BlueScope Steel property where little flora and fauna investigation has been undertaken in recent decades.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 17

4. Results

The study area is located approximately 70 km to the south east of the Melbourne central business district on the Mornington Peninsula. It includes private land owned by BlueScope Steel and Crown land located within the Hastings SUZ1 (Figure A1).

The study area is within the:

Gippsland Plain bioregion

Management area of Melbourne Water and/or the Port Phillip and Western Port Catchment Management Authority (CMA)

Mornington Peninsula Shire.

The ecological features of the study area are described below and mapped in Figure A2.

Species recorded during the flora and fauna assessment are listed in Appendix B (flora) and Appendix C (fauna). Unless of particular note, these species are not discussed further.

Species recorded or predicted to occur in the local area are also listed in the relevant appendices along with an assessment of the likelihood of each species occurring within the study area. Likelihood of occurrence for species in this list has been updated since the desktop assessment (Biosis 2014b) based on the findings of this flora and fauna assessment.

4.1 Landscape context

The study area borders part of the Western Port shoreline and coastal ecosystems within the Western Port Ramsar wetland. The Ramsar wetland includes the whole of Western Port with an arbitrary boundary line between Point Leo and Silverleaves, near Cowes (excluding the land area of French Island). It includes 26,272 ha of permanent and semi-permanent saline wetlands comprising marine sub-tidal aquatic beds, intertidal mud and sand flats, intertidal marshes (including saltmarshes) and intertidal forested wetlands (mangroves) (DSEWPaC 2010). The status of Western Port as a Ramsar wetland of international importance is due to the ability of the area to support a large number of waterbirds and other key habitat features.

Land to the north, west and south of the study area includes farmland with modified pasture and some remnant native scrub, woodland and forest. To the north, native vegetation patches within the local area are remnants of the largely cleared Koo-wee-rup Swamp (Yugovic 2011) and retain some ecological connectivity with more elevated land around Cranbourne and Pakenham. The native vegetation remnants of the Koo-wee-rup Swamp contribute to a significant area of the lower Western Port catchment and support a number of significant ecological features including nationally threatened flora and fauna species. The linear network of vegetated and well-connected drains and roadsides in the Koo Wee Rup-Tooradin area are well known for their habitat value for fauna including Southern Brown Bandicoot and Swamp Skink. These species have persisted in areas of both native and substantially non-native vegetation along these linear corridors by virtue of their high level of landscape connectivity.

Land within 2 km of the study area has largely the same geomorphology as the study area. The Langwarrin Flora and Fauna Reserve to the northwest, includes a large area of native vegetation with a high diversity of native species. The landscape to the west has largely been cleared of native vegetation in lowland areas and extant native vegetation is mostly restricted to roadsides, waterways and smaller private and public reserves.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 18

4.2 Vegetation & fauna habitat

The study area supports a large extent (330 ha) of native vegetation within BlueScope Steel and Crown land in reserves and the coastal zone. A large area of land within BlueScope is also leased for agricultural use.

Most of the native vegetation comprises coastal eucalypt woodland communities or areas of Swamp Scrub, Estuarine Shrub, Mangrove Shrubland and Coastal Saltmarsh. The study area supports a range of ecological features including large intact and high quality areas of native vegetation, native vegetation within conservation reserves, smaller patches of native vegetation in Crown land, the coastal zone, scattered trees and minor waterways. The coastal zone (within 0.5 km of the shoreline) comprises largely native vegetation and represents a high diversity of plant communities and associated fauna habitats which grade into other natural environments further inland. Extant native vegetation within the study area represents several different ecosystems within a relatively short distance along the coastal–inland gradient. There are few similar examples within the Port Phillip and Western Port region where this gradient is relatively contiguous and occupied by native vegetation of good quality. The BlueScope Steel property and adjoining areas represent one of the largest and most diverse, intact areas of native vegetation within the Port Phillip and Western Port coastal region.

These vegetation communities and fauna habitat features are described further in Table 2 and mapped in Figure A2. Photos of some EVCs and surveyed fauna are provided in Appendix D.

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

Dra

ft fo

r dis

cuss

ion

purp

oses

19

Tabl

e 2:

Sum

mar

y of

veg

etat

ion

and

habi

tat

type

s w

ithi

n th

e st

udy

area

Vege

tati

on o

r ha

bita

t typ

e D

escr

ipti

on

Loca

tion

M

appe

d ar

ea

Sign

ifica

nt v

alue

s

Ecol

ogic

al V

eget

atio

n Cl

asse

s

Dam

p Sa

nds

Her

b-ri

ch

Woo

dlan

d

EVC

3

Dam

p Sa

nds

Her

b-ric

h W

oodl

and

occu

rs in

land

on

sand

y su

bstr

ates

with

a c

laye

y up

per h

oriz

on.

This

EVC

is

char

acte

rised

by

an o

vers

tore

y co

ntai

ning

Sw

amp

Gum

Eu

caly

ptus

ova

ta a

nd m

ay in

clud

e as

sub

-dom

inan

t spe

cies

Ro

ugh-

bark

ed M

anna

-gum

Euc

alyp

tus v

imin

alis

subs

p.

pryo

riana

and

Nar

row

-leaf

Pep

perm

int.

The

gro

und

laye

r is

mod

erat

ely

rich

in g

rass

spe

cies

and

oth

er h

erbs

. Sh

rub

spec

ies

incl

ude

Blac

k W

attle

Aca

cia

mea

rnsii

, Sce

nted

Pa

perb

ark

Mel

aleu

ca sq

uarr

osa,

Sno

wy

Dai

sy-b

ush

Ole

aria

lir

ata

and

Smoo

th P

arro

t-pea

Dill

wyn

ia g

labe

rrim

a.

Und

erst

orey

veg

etat

ion

may

be

dom

inat

ed b

y gr

asse

s,

rush

es a

nd/o

r sed

ges

in s

ome

exam

ples

incl

udin

g Zi

g-za

g Bo

g-se

dge

Scho

enus

bre

vifo

lius,

Com

mon

Sca

le-r

ush

Lepy

rodi

a m

uelle

ri, K

nobb

y Cl

ub-s

edge

, Tha

tch

Saw

-sed

ge

Gahn

ia ra

dula

, wal

laby

-gra

sses

Ryt

idos

perm

a sp

p. a

nd

spea

r-gr

asse

s Au

stro

stip

a sp

p. I

n su

ch a

reas

the

com

bina

tion

of s

hrub

spe

cies

and

dom

inan

t can

opy

tree

de

term

ine

the

EVC.

Alon

g th

e pr

imar

y du

ne o

f som

e se

ctio

ns o

f the

Wes

tern

Po

rt c

oast

line,

a w

oodl

and

com

mun

ity o

ccur

s w

hich

has

th

e ca

nopy

spe

cies

Coa

st M

anna

-gum

. Its

und

erst

orey

co

mpo

sitio

n in

clud

es a

mix

of s

peci

es th

at a

re to

lera

nt o

f sa

line

cond

ition

from

hig

h tid

e se

epag

e e.

g. K

nobb

y Cl

ub-

sedg

e Fi

cini

a no

dosa

, Sea

Rus

h Ju

ncus

kra

ussii

and

Spi

ny-

head

ed M

at-r

ush

Lom

andr

a lo

ngifo

lia.

Shal

low

root

ed

glyc

ophy

tes

are

also

pre

sent

. Th

e co

mpo

sitio

n of

the

unde

rsto

rey

vege

tatio

n an

d th

e la

ndsc

ape

cont

ext o

f thi

s

Spre

ad th

roug

hout

th

e Bl

ueSc

ope

prop

erty

.

62.6

ha

Appr

opria

te h

abita

t for

Sou

ther

n Br

own

Band

icoo

t and

Whi

te-fo

oted

Dun

nart

.

Hab

itat f

or P

urpl

e D

iuris

.

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

Dra

ft fo

r dis

cuss

ion

purp

oses

20

Vege

tati

on o

r ha

bita

t typ

e D

escr

ipti

on

Loca

tion

M

appe

d ar

ea

Sign

ifica

nt v

alue

s

com

mun

ity is

unu

sual

and

mak

e it

wor

thy

of s

epar

ate

EVC

rank

as

it do

es n

ot fi

t nea

tly in

to a

ny e

xtan

t EVC

. It

is m

ost

clos

ely

alig

ned

with

this

com

mun

ity a

nd a

s su

ch is

map

ped

as D

amp

Sand

s H

erb-

rich

Woo

dlan

d fo

r the

pur

pose

s of

th

is re

port

.

Coas

tal S

altm

arsh

EV

C 9

Occ

urs

on c

oast

al fl

ats

and

estu

arie

s w

hich

are

sub

ject

to

tidal

flow

s. T

his

EVC

is tr

eele

ss a

nd c

omm

only

com

pris

es a

su

ite o

f hal

ophy

tic h

erb

and

shru

b sp

ecie

s su

ch a

s Te

ctic

orni

a ar

busc

ula

Shru

bby

Gla

ssw

ort,

Suae

da a

ustr

alis

Aust

ral S

eabl

ite, C

reep

ing

Broo

kwee

d Sa

mol

us re

pens

, Co

ast S

aw-s

edge

Gah

nia

filum

, Aus

tral

ian

Salt-

gras

s Di

stic

hlis

dist

icho

phyl

la, K

nobb

y Cl

ub-s

edge

Fici

nia

nodo

sa

and

Roun

ded

Noo

n-flo

wer

Disp

hym

a cr

assif

oliu

m.

A la

rge

cont

iguo

us

area

alo

ng th

e co

asta

l edg

e of

Bl

ueSc

ope

as w

ell

as s

mal

l are

as to

th

e no

rth

and

sout

h on

Cro

wn

land

.

39.3

ha

Hab

itat f

or O

rang

e-be

llied

Par

rot,

Swam

p Sk

ink

and

mig

rato

ry s

hore

bird

s.

Estu

arin

e W

etla

nd

EVC

10

Estu

arin

e W

etla

nd o

ccur

s in

upp

er a

nd lo

wer

reac

hes

of

estu

arie

s, w

here

ther

e is

tida

l inf

luen

ce.

This

EVC

is

tree

less

and

is d

omin

ated

by

Chaf

fy S

aw-s

edge

Gah

nia

filum

and

Coa

st S

aw-s

edge

Gah

nia

trifi

da b

oth

of w

hich

pr

ovid

e re

lativ

ely

high

cov

er.

Oth

er c

o-oc

curr

ing

spec

ies

incl

ude

a su

ite o

f hal

ophy

tes

typi

cally

foun

d in

Coa

stal

Sa

ltmar

sh; t

hese

EVC

s of

ten

occu

r in

a m

osai

c.

Scat

tere

d al

ong

the

coas

tal m

argi

n ge

nera

lly o

n th

e in

land

sid

e of

sa

ltmar

sh.

4.1

ha

Appr

opria

te h

abita

t for

Ora

nge-

belli

ed

Parr

ot a

nd m

igra

tory

sho

rebi

rds.

Hea

thy

Woo

dlan

d

EVC

48

Hea

thy

Woo

dlan

d oc

curs

inla

nd o

n ol

der s

and

dune

s an

d el

evat

ed a

reas

of m

ore

free

ly d

rain

ing

sand

y so

ils.

This

EV

C in

clud

es th

e do

min

ant c

anop

y sp

ecie

s Co

ast M

anna

-gu

m E

ucal

yptu

s vim

inal

is su

bsp.

pry

oria

na.

Com

mon

talle

r sh

rub

spec

ies

incl

ude

Hea

th T

ea-tr

ee L

epto

sper

mum

m

yrsin

oide

s, Pr

ickl

y Te

a-tr

ee L

epto

sper

mum

con

tinen

tale

and

W

eddi

ng B

ush

Rici

noca

rpos

pin

ifoliu

s. T

he g

roun

d flo

ra

may

be

rich

in s

peci

es a

nd c

omm

only

incl

ude

Pric

kly

Gui

nea-

flow

er H

ibbe

rtia

acic

ular

is, S

how

y Pa

rrot

-pea

Di

llwyn

ia se

ricea

, Hor

ny C

one-

bush

Isop

ogon

cer

atop

hyllu

s,

In th

e re

serv

e of

f Ya

ringa

Rd,

with

pa

tche

s in

the

nort

h an

d ce

ntre

of

Blue

Scop

e.

35.8

ha

Appr

opria

te h

abita

t for

Sou

ther

n Br

own

Band

icoo

t and

Whi

te-fo

oted

Dun

nart

.

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

Dra

ft fo

r dis

cuss

ion

purp

oses

21

Vege

tati

on o

r ha

bita

t typ

e D

escr

ipti

on

Loca

tion

M

appe

d ar

ea

Sign

ifica

nt v

alue

s

spea

r gra

sses

Aus

tros

tipa

spp.

, wal

laby

gra

sses

Ry

tidos

perm

a sp

p. a

nd A

ustr

al B

rack

en P

terid

ium

es

cule

ntum

.

Swam

p Sc

rub

EV

C 53

Sw

amp

Scru

b oc

curs

thro

ugho

ut n

umer

ous

drai

nage

line

s,

flood

plai

ns, s

wam

ps a

nd ri

paria

n zo

nes

whe

re th

ere

is

negl

igib

le in

fluen

ce o

f sal

ine

grou

ndw

ater

. Th

is E

VC is

do

min

ated

by

Swam

p Pa

perb

ark

Mel

aleu

ca e

ricifo

lia a

nd

may

als

o in

clud

e Bl

ackw

ood

Acac

ia m

elan

oxyl

on, B

lack

W

attle

Aca

cia

mea

rnsii

and

occ

asio

nal e

ucal

ypts

. U

nder

stor

ey c

ompo

nent

s in

clud

e W

eepi

ng G

rass

M

icrol

aena

stip

oide

s, ru

shes

Junc

us s

pp. a

nd B

rack

en

Pter

idiu

m e

scul

entu

m.

Goo

d qu

ality

exa

mpl

es a

re ra

re

with

in th

e st

udy

area

. Th

e cr

eekl

ine

to th

e so

uth

of T

yabb

W

aste

Dis

posa

l Cen

tre

incl

udes

a h

igh

qual

ity e

xam

ple

of

this

EVC

with

a m

ore

natu

ral u

nder

stor

ey p

lant

co

mpo

sitio

n an

d fe

w w

eed

spec

ies.

It a

lso

prov

ided

ha

bita

t for

Riv

er S

wam

p W

alla

by-g

rass

whe

re S

wam

p Pa

perb

ark

cano

py o

peni

ngs

occu

r.

Scat

tere

d th

roug

hout

Bl

ueSc

ope

and

Crow

n la

nd a

long

dr

aina

ge li

nes.

9 ha

Ap

prop

riate

hab

itat f

or S

wam

p Sk

ink

and

Glo

ssy

Gra

ss S

kink

.

Hab

itat f

or R

iver

Sw

amp

Wal

laby

-gra

ss.

Wet

land

For

mat

ion

EVC

74

A br

oad

EVC

that

inco

rpor

ates

a ra

nge

of fr

eshw

ater

w

etla

nds,

ofte

n of

art

ifici

al o

rigin

. O

ccur

s in

topo

grap

hic

depr

essi

ons

asso

ciat

ed w

ith s

tand

ing

wat

er ra

ngin

g fr

om

perm

anen

t to

ephe

mer

al w

ater

bod

ies.

Str

uctu

rally

, thi

s EV

C ca

n co

nsis

t of h

erbl

and,

sed

gela

nd a

nd ru

shla

nd

elem

ents

and

is c

hara

cter

ised

by

the

lack

of w

oody

pla

nts

(shr

ubs

and

tree

s).

Wet

land

For

mat

ion

is c

lose

ly re

late

d to

Se

dge

Wet

land

that

dom

inat

es s

imila

r wat

erlo

gged

site

s in

lo

w ra

infa

ll ar

eas

of th

e G

ipps

land

pla

ins.

The

EPB

C Ac

t lis

ted

spec

ies

Rive

r Sw

amp

Wal

laby

-gra

ss A

mph

ibro

mus

flu

itans

is p

rese

nt in

this

veg

etat

ion

type

.

In th

e no

rthw

est o

f Bl

ueSc

ope

sout

h of

th

e Es

so e

asem

ent.

9.7

ha

Hab

itat f

or S

outh

ern

Toad

let.

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

Dra

ft fo

r dis

cuss

ion

purp

oses

22

Vege

tati

on o

r ha

bita

t typ

e D

escr

ipti

on

Loca

tion

M

appe

d ar

ea

Sign

ifica

nt v

alue

s

Swam

py R

ipar

ian

Woo

dlan

d (S

RW) E

VC

83 /

Swam

py

Woo

dlan

d (S

W)

EVC

937

Occ

urs

in lo

w ly

ing

area

s w

ith o

ften

poor

ly d

rain

ed

seas

onal

ly w

ater

logg

ed s

oils

and

in ri

paria

n zo

nes

of

smal

ler w

ater

way

s. T

he d

omin

ant c

anop

y sp

ecie

s is

ty

pica

lly S

wam

p G

um E

ucal

yptu

s ova

ta a

nd th

e un

ders

tore

y sh

rub

Swam

p Pa

perb

ark

Mel

aleu

ca e

ricifo

lia is

com

mon

. Th

e gr

ound

flor

a is

usu

ally

mod

ified

and

incl

udes

Wee

ping

G

rass

Mic

rola

ena

stip

oide

s, Co

mm

on T

usso

ck-g

rass

Poa

la

billa

rdie

rei,

Shru

bby

Fire

wee

d Se

neci

o m

inim

us, r

ushe

s an

d se

dges

. Sw

ampy

Rip

aria

n W

oodl

and

occu

rs in

ripa

rian

zone

s an

d Sw

ampy

Woo

dlan

d oc

curs

on

flood

plai

ns

asso

ciat

ed w

ith w

ater

way

s. A

s su

ch, S

wam

py W

oodl

and

may

occ

upy

flats

ove

r lar

ger a

reas

and

tend

s to

ther

efor

e ex

tend

into

agr

icul

tura

l lan

d.

Gen

eral

ly o

ccur

s al

ong

edge

s of

Sw

amp

Scru

b or

Es

tuar

ine

Scru

b be

fore

Mel

aleu

ca

erici

folia

bec

omes

do

min

ant.

5.4

ha

Appr

opria

te h

abita

t for

Sw

amp

Skin

k an

d G

loss

y G

rass

Ski

nk.

Hab

itat f

or S

outh

ern

Toad

let.

Plai

ns G

rass

y W

etla

nd

EVC

125

The

char

acte

ristic

gro

und

cove

r is

dom

inat

ed b

y gr

asse

s an

d sm

all s

edge

s an

d he

rbs.

The

veg

etat

ion

is ty

pica

lly

spec

ies-

rich

on th

e ou

ter v

erge

s bu

t is

usua

lly s

peci

es-p

oor

in th

e w

ette

r cen

tral

are

as.

The

EPBC

Act

list

ed s

peci

es

Rive

r Sw

amp

Wal

laby

-gra

ss A

mph

ibro

mus

flui

tans

is

pres

ent i

n se

vera

l exa

mpl

es o

f thi

s ve

geta

tion

type

.

Sout

h of

Den

ham

Ro

ad in

Blu

eSco

pe.

1.1

ha

Hab

itat f

or th

reat

ened

and

/or m

igra

tory

w

etla

nd b

irds.

Hab

itat f

or R

iver

Sw

amp

Wal

laby

-gra

ss,

Swam

p Fi

rew

eed

and

Swam

p Ev

erla

stin

g.

Sedg

e W

etla

nd

EVC

136

Sedg

e W

etla

nd o

ccur

s in

sea

sona

lly in

unda

ted

or

perm

anen

t fre

sh w

ater

bodi

es.

This

EVC

typi

cally

incl

udes

fe

w s

peci

es w

here

wat

er is

una

ble

to re

cede

but

may

in

clud

e a

suite

of s

mal

ler h

erb

in s

hallo

w w

ater

. Ty

pica

l sp

ecie

s in

clud

e Co

mm

on S

pike

-sed

ge E

leoc

haris

acu

ta, T

all

Spik

e-se

dge

Eleo

char

is s

phac

elat

a, tw

ig-s

edge

s Ba

umea

sp

p., C

ente

lla C

ente

lla c

ordi

folia

, milf

oils

Myr

ioph

yllu

m s

pp.,

Rive

r But

terc

up R

anun

culu

s inu

ndat

us, r

ushe

s Ju

ncus

spp

., Sm

all L

oose

strif

e Ly

thru

m h

ysso

pifo

lia a

nd R

unni

ng M

arsh

-flo

wer

Vill

arsia

reni

form

is.

Occ

urs

in v

ery

smal

l pat

ches

th

roug

hout

the

Blue

Scop

e pr

oper

ty.

0.7

ha

Hab

itat f

or S

outh

ern

Toad

let.

Hab

itat f

or R

iver

Sw

amp

Wal

laby

-gra

ss.

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

Dra

ft fo

r dis

cuss

ion

purp

oses

23

Vege

tati

on o

r ha

bita

t typ

e D

escr

ipti

on

Loca

tion

M

appe

d ar

ea

Sign

ifica

nt v

alue

s

Man

grov

e Sh

rubl

and

EV

C 14

0 M

angr

ove

Shru

blan

d oc

curs

on

coas

tal m

udfla

ts a

nd in

es

tuar

ies.

Thi

s EV

C al

mos

t ent

irely

com

pris

es th

e sh

rub

Whi

te M

angr

ove

Avic

enni

a m

arin

a su

bsp.

aus

tral

asic

a w

hich

us

ually

is <

2 m

tall.

Sev

eral

hal

ophy

tes

spec

ies

occu

r as

min

or c

ompo

nent

s to

this

EVC

. W

here

sal

tmar

sh s

peci

es

mak

e up

50%

cov

er o

r mor

e, th

is m

ay b

e re

gard

ed a

s th

e EP

BC A

ct c

omm

unity

Sub

trop

ical

and

Tem

pera

te C

oast

al

Saltm

arsh

.

A la

rge

strip

alo

ng

the

coas

tal r

egio

n of

Blu

eSco

pe a

nd

patc

hes

furt

her

sout

h.

33.3

ha

Appr

opria

te h

abita

t for

Sw

amp

Skin

k an

d G

loss

y G

rass

Ski

nk.

Gra

ssy

Woo

dlan

d

EVC

175

Occ

urs

inla

nd o

n lo

amy

soils

. Th

e do

min

ant c

anop

y sp

ecie

s Co

ast M

anna

Gum

. Th

e un

ders

tore

y is

dom

inat

ed

by n

ativ

e gr

asse

s su

ch a

s w

alla

by g

rass

es R

ytid

ospe

rma

spp.

spe

ar g

rass

es A

ustr

ostip

a sp

p., p

lum

e gr

asse

s Di

chel

achn

e sp

p. a

nd K

anga

roo

Gra

ss T

hem

eda

tria

ndra

; an

d it

has

scat

tere

d sh

rubs

suc

h as

Hed

ge W

attle

Aca

cia

para

doxa

, Bla

ck S

heoa

k Al

loca

suar

ina

litto

ralis

and

Bl

ackw

ood

Acac

ia m

elan

oxyl

on.

Goo

d qu

ality

exa

mpl

es

occu

r with

in th

e Bl

ueSc

ope

Stee

l lan

d at

Tya

bb w

here

co

mm

on s

peci

es in

clud

ed C

oast

Man

na-g

um, H

edge

W

attle

, Pric

kly

Tea-

tree

, Bris

tly W

alla

by-g

rass

Ryt

idos

perm

a se

tace

um, S

lend

er W

alla

by-g

rass

Ryt

idos

perm

a ra

cem

osum

, Su

pple

Spe

ar-g

rass

Aus

tros

tipa

mol

lis, V

eine

d Sp

ear-

gras

s Au

stro

stip

a ru

dis s

ubsp

. rud

is, P

ale

Gra

ss-li

ly C

aesia

pa

rvifl

ora,

sun

-orc

hids

The

lym

itra

spp.

, oni

on-o

rchi

ds

Micr

otis

spp.

, Lon

g Pu

rple

Fla

g Pa

ters

onia

occ

iden

tals,

M

ilkm

aids

Bur

char

dia

umbe

llata

and

Cho

cola

te L

ily

Arth

ropo

dium

stric

tum

.

Vario

us p

atch

es in

Bl

ueSc

ope

and

with

in s

mal

ler

poly

gons

alo

ng th

e co

ast.

33.3

ha

Appr

opria

te h

abita

t for

Sou

ther

n Br

own

Band

icoo

t and

Whi

te-fo

oted

Dun

nart

.

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

Dra

ft fo

r dis

cuss

ion

purp

oses

24

Vege

tati

on o

r ha

bita

t typ

e D

escr

ipti

on

Loca

tion

M

appe

d ar

ea

Sign

ifica

nt v

alue

s

Aqua

tic

Her

blan

d

EVC

653

Occ

urs

in s

hallo

w d

epre

ssio

n of

bla

ck c

lays

or p

eat,

on

flood

plai

ns a

nd d

une

depr

essi

on w

hich

are

sea

sona

lly

inun

date

d. T

his

EVC

is tr

eele

ss a

nd ty

pica

lly c

onta

ins

the

dom

inan

t spe

cies

Wat

er R

ibbo

n Tr

iglo

chin

pro

cera

, St

reak

ed A

rrow

gras

s Tr

iglo

chin

stria

ta, S

wam

p Li

ly O

ttelia

ov

alifo

lia, R

ed P

ondw

eed

Pota

mog

eton

che

esem

anii,

Whi

te

Purs

lane

Mon

tia a

ustr

alas

ica, S

oft T

wig

-sed

ge B

aum

ea

rubi

gino

sa, W

ater

Pla

ntai

n Al

isma

Plan

tago

-aqu

atic

a, m

ilfoi

ls

Myr

ioph

yllu

m s

pp.,

Com

mon

Ree

d Ph

ragm

ites a

ustr

alis,

Tal

l Se

dge

Care

x ap

pres

sa a

nd ru

shes

Junc

us s

pp.

The

EPBC

Act

lis

ted

spec

ies

Rive

r Sw

amp

Wal

laby

-gra

ss A

mph

ibro

mus

flu

itans

is p

rese

nt in

this

veg

etat

ion

type

.

Nor

ther

n pa

rt o

f Bl

ueSc

ope.

0.

4 ha

H

abita

t for

thre

aten

ed a

nd/o

r mig

rato

ry

wet

land

bird

s.

Hab

itat f

or R

iver

Sw

amp

Wal

laby

-gra

ss,

Swam

p Fi

rew

eed

and

Swam

p Ev

erla

stin

g.

Dam

p H

eath

land

EV

C 71

0 O

ccur

s in

pea

ty s

ands

in d

rain

age

lines

am

ongs

t Dam

p H

eath

y W

oodl

and.

Thi

s EV

C is

a tr

eele

ss v

eget

atio

n ty

pe

that

is d

omin

ated

by

a nu

mbe

r of s

hrub

spe

cies

and

gr

amin

oids

(gra

sses

, sed

ges

and

rush

es).

Tot

al v

eget

atio

n co

ver i

s ty

pica

lly h

igh

(>50

%) w

ith s

hrub

s to

abo

ut 3

m ta

ll an

d ta

ller g

ram

inoi

d w

ith fe

w a

reas

of o

pen

grou

nd.

With

in th

e lo

cal a

rea,

this

EVC

typi

cally

incl

udes

the

char

acte

ristic

spe

cies

Allo

casu

arin

a pa

ludo

sa, M

anuk

a Le

ptos

perm

um sc

opar

ium

, Silv

er B

anks

ia B

anks

ia m

argi

nata

, Ba

re T

wig

-sed

ge B

aum

ea ju

ncea

, Com

mon

Sca

le-r

ush

Lepy

rodi

a m

uelle

ri, P

ithy

Swor

d-se

dge

Lepi

dosp

erm

a lo

ngitu

dina

le, S

prea

ding

Rop

e-ru

sh E

mpo

dism

a m

inus

, Zig

-Za

g Bo

g-se

dge

Scho

enus

bre

vifo

lius a

nd S

lend

er B

og-s

edge

Sc

hoen

us le

pido

sper

ma.

Patc

hes

scat

tere

d th

rout

h bu

shla

nd

in th

e no

rth

of

Blue

Scop

e pr

oper

ty

sout

h of

Pik

es R

d an

d w

est o

f W

hitn

eys

Rd.

9.1

ha

Pote

ntia

lly a

ppro

pria

te h

abita

t for

So

uthe

rn B

row

n Ba

ndic

oot a

nd W

hite

-fo

oted

Dun

nart

. H

igh

dens

ities

of s

mal

l na

tive

mam

mal

s re

cord

ed d

urin

g pr

esen

t in

vest

igat

ions

.

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

Dra

ft fo

r dis

cuss

ion

purp

oses

25

Vege

tati

on o

r ha

bita

t typ

e D

escr

ipti

on

Loca

tion

M

appe

d ar

ea

Sign

ifica

nt v

alue

s

Dam

p H

eath

y W

oodl

and

EV

C 79

3

Dam

p H

eath

y W

oodl

and

is a

tree

d ve

geta

tion

type

that

oc

curs

on

larg

ely

sand

y-cl

ay s

oils

. It

incl

udes

a m

oder

atel

y sh

rubb

y un

ders

tore

y w

ith a

usu

ally

den

se c

over

of

gram

inoi

ds a

nd lo

w c

over

of f

orbs

. W

ithin

the

loca

l are

a,

this

EVC

typi

cally

incl

udes

the

follo

win

g flo

ristic

s. T

he

cano

py is

usu

ally

dom

inat

ed b

y N

arro

w-le

af P

eppe

rmin

t an

d Sw

amp

Gum

Euc

alyp

tus o

vata

may

occ

ur o

ccas

iona

lly.

The

shru

b la

yer t

ypic

ally

incl

udes

Scr

ub S

heoa

k Al

loca

suar

ina

palu

dosa

and

Silv

er B

anks

ia a

nd th

e gr

ound

flo

ra is

usu

ally

dom

inat

ed b

y Th

atch

Saw

-sed

ge G

ahni

a ra

dula

, Pith

y Sw

ord-

sedg

e Le

pido

sper

ma

long

itudi

nale

and

ot

her c

omm

on s

edge

s/ru

shes

foun

d in

Dam

p H

eath

land

.

This

EVC

is g

ener

ally

dis

tingu

ishe

d fr

om D

amp

Sand

s H

erb-

rich

Woo

dlan

d by

hav

ing

only

sub

-dom

inan

ce o

f Sw

amp

Gum

and

relia

bly

incl

udin

g th

e ch

arac

teris

tic s

peci

es S

crub

Sh

eoak

. Th

ere

are

also

few

er fo

rbs

in th

e gr

ound

laye

r, al

thou

gh g

roun

d flo

ra c

ompo

sitio

n va

ries

with

in E

VCs

depe

ndin

g on

mic

ro-v

aria

tion

in s

oil c

ompo

sitio

n. T

his

EVC

can

usua

lly b

e di

stin

guis

hed

by th

e hi

gher

cov

er o

f sed

ges

and

rush

es a

nd a

can

opy

that

is d

omin

ated

by

Nar

row

-leaf

Pe

pper

min

t.

Foun

d in

the

nort

hern

par

t of

Blue

Scop

e as

wel

l as

a p

ortio

n of

the

vege

tatio

n so

uth

of

Den

ham

Roa

d.

51.9

ha

Appr

opria

te h

abita

t for

Sou

ther

n Br

own

Band

icoo

t and

Whi

te-fo

oted

Dun

nart

.

Hab

itat f

or P

urpl

e D

iuris

.

Estu

arin

e Sc

rub

EV

C 95

3 Es

tuar

ine

Scru

b us

ually

in a

coa

stal

bel

t beh

ind

Coas

tal

Saltm

arsh

, oth

er lo

w-s

tatu

red

coas

tal v

eget

atio

n or

a s

mal

l pr

imar

y du

ne w

oodl

and

betw

een

saltm

arsh

and

inla

nd

vege

tatio

n ty

pes.

Thi

s EV

C ap

pear

s st

ruct

ural

ly a

s Sw

amp

Scru

b an

d ha

s th

e sa

me

dom

inan

t shr

ubs

spec

ies

Swam

p Pa

perb

ark

Mel

aleu

ca e

ricifo

lia to

abo

ut 6

m ta

ll. T

he

unde

rsto

rey

vege

tatio

n in

clud

es a

mod

erat

e di

vers

ity o

f ha

loph

ytes

as

wel

l as

glyc

ophy

tes

whi

ch to

lera

te p

erio

dic

expo

sure

to s

alin

e co

nditi

ons.

Dom

inan

t und

erst

orey

A la

rge

exte

nt o

f th

e co

mm

unity

oc

curs

with

in

Blue

Scop

e be

twee

n th

e co

asta

l sa

ltmar

sh

com

mun

ities

, as

wel

l as

smal

l pa

tche

s in

oth

er

34.3

ha

Appr

opria

te h

abita

t for

Sw

amp

Skin

k an

d G

loss

y G

rass

Ski

nk.

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

Dra

ft fo

r dis

cuss

ion

purp

oses

26

Vege

tati

on o

r ha

bita

t typ

e D

escr

ipti

on

Loca

tion

M

appe

d ar

ea

Sign

ifica

nt v

alue

s

spec

ies

incl

ude

Gah

nia

filum

Cha

ffy S

aw-s

edge

, Bar

e-tw

ig

Sedg

e Ba

umea

junc

ea a

nd n

eare

r to

the

coas

t, gr

ound

co

ver s

peci

es ty

pica

l of C

oast

al S

altm

arsh

may

dom

inat

e;

in p

artic

ular

Kno

bby

Club

-sed

ge F

icin

ia n

odos

a, R

ound

ed-

Noo

n Fl

ower

Disp

hym

a cr

assif

oliu

m a

nd A

ustr

alia

n Sa

lt-gr

ass

Dist

ichlis

dist

icho

phyl

la.

The

grou

nd m

ay b

e do

min

ated

by

leaf

litte

r or b

are

soil

(pea

ts).

area

s.

List

ed E

colo

gica

l Com

mun

itie

s

EPBC

Act

Sub

trop

ical

an

d Te

mpe

rate

Co

asta

l Sal

tmar

sh

Area

s w

hich

cor

resp

ond

with

Coa

stal

Sal

tmar

sh E

VC 9

and

Es

tuar

ine

Wet

land

EVC

10

qual

ify a

s th

e EP

BC A

ct li

sted

co

mm

unity

on

the

basi

s of

the

defin

ition

thre

shol

d cr

iteria

.

The

liste

d ec

olog

ical

com

mun

ity (D

SEW

PaC

2013

a) in

clud

es

a ra

nge

of lo

w s

tatu

re, p

lant

com

mun

ities

with

var

ying

co

mpo

sitio

n an

d st

ruct

ure.

The

y in

clud

e gr

assl

and

dom

inat

ed b

y Pr

ickl

y Sp

ear-

gras

s Au

stro

stip

a st

ipoi

des,

sedg

elan

d do

min

ated

by

saw

-sed

ges

Gahn

ia s

pp.,

rush

land

do

min

ated

by

Sea

Rush

Junc

us k

raus

sii a

nd h

alop

hyte

sh

rubl

and

dom

inat

ed b

y gl

assw

orts

Tec

ticor

nia

arbu

scul

a an

d Sa

rcoc

orni

a sp

p. T

he li

sted

com

mun

ity in

clud

es a

reas

th

at a

re e

coto

nes

with

oth

er c

omm

uniti

es p

rovi

ded

that

m

ore

than

50%

of t

he g

roun

d co

ver i

s m

ade

up o

f sa

ltmar

sh c

omm

unity

spe

cies

. Pa

tche

s m

ay e

ither

be

a si

ngle

isol

ated

pat

ch >

0.1

ha o

r mul

tiple

sm

all p

atch

es

with

in a

mos

aic

of o

ther

veg

etat

ion

whe

re th

e m

osai

c is

>0

.1 h

a. I

n th

e la

tter e

xam

ple,

ther

e sh

ould

be

<30

m

dist

ance

bet

wee

n sa

ltmar

sh p

atch

es.

A la

rge

cont

iguo

us

area

alo

ng th

e co

asta

l edg

e of

Bl

ueSc

ope

as w

ell

as s

mal

l are

as to

th

e no

rth

and

sout

h on

Cro

wn

land

.

43.4

ha

EPBC

Act

list

ed e

colo

gica

l com

mun

ity.

Hab

itat f

or O

rang

e-be

llied

Par

rot,

Swam

p Sk

ink

and

mig

rato

ry s

hore

bird

s.

EPBC

Act

Sea

sona

l H

erba

ceou

s W

etla

nd

(Fre

shw

ater

) of t

he

The

pres

ence

of t

hese

com

mun

ities

is d

eter

min

ed b

y th

e si

ze a

nd d

istr

ibut

ion

of w

etla

nd p

atch

es a

s w

ell a

s th

e co

mpo

sitio

n of

spe

cies

. Ar

eas

whi

ch c

orre

spon

d w

ith

Scat

tere

d th

roug

hout

Bl

ueSc

ope

to th

e

3 ha

H

abita

t for

thre

aten

ed a

nd/o

r mig

rato

ry

wet

land

bird

s.

Hab

itat f

or R

iver

Sw

amp

Wal

laby

-gra

ss,

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

Dra

ft fo

r dis

cuss

ion

purp

oses

27

Vege

tati

on o

r ha

bita

t typ

e D

escr

ipti

on

Loca

tion

M

appe

d ar

ea

Sign

ifica

nt v

alue

s

Tem

pera

te L

owla

nd

Plai

ns /

FFG

Act

Her

b-ri

ch P

lain

s G

rass

y W

etla

nd (W

est

Gip

psla

nd)

Plai

ns G

rass

y W

etla

nd E

VC 1

25 a

nd A

quat

ic H

erbl

and

EVC

653

and

som

e hi

gher

qua

lity

area

s of

Wet

land

For

mat

ion

EVC

74 q

ualif

y as

bot

h of

thes

e co

mm

uniti

es o

n th

e ba

sis

of th

e de

finiti

on th

resh

old

crite

ria.

Area

s m

appe

d as

the

thre

aten

ed c

omm

uniti

es a

re in

dica

ted

in F

igur

e A2

.

sout

h of

Pik

es R

oad

and

sout

h of

D

enha

m R

oad.

Swam

p Fi

rew

eed

and

Swam

p Ev

erla

stin

g.

Oth

er h

abit

at fe

atur

es

Scat

tere

d tr

ees

Scat

tere

d re

mna

nt a

nd p

lant

ed tr

ees

with

in th

e st

udy

area

pr

ovid

e a

fora

ging

reso

urce

for m

obile

faun

a sp

ecie

s.

Som

e of

the

tree

s co

ntai

n ho

llow

s.

Thro

ugho

ut th

e st

udy

area

. -

Fora

ging

and

roos

ting

habi

tat f

or m

icro

bat

spec

ies.

Intr

oduc

ed p

astu

res

Thes

e ar

eas

supp

ort g

rass

land

s do

min

ated

by

indi

geno

us

and

non-

nativ

e gr

asse

s th

at a

re re

gula

rly g

raze

d.

Agric

ultu

ral l

and

scat

tere

d th

roug

hout

.

- Th

ese

area

s ha

ve li

ttle

valu

e fo

r sig

nific

ant

flora

and

faun

a sp

ecie

s. N

ativ

e bi

rd s

peci

es

that

typi

cally

occ

upy

farm

land

are

as m

ay

occa

sion

ally

use

intr

oduc

ed p

astu

res

for

fora

ging

.

Cons

truc

ted

dam

s Se

vera

l con

stru

cted

dam

s oc

cur w

ithin

the

stud

y ar

ea.

Thes

e va

ry in

thei

r pla

nt c

ompo

sitio

n w

ith n

ativ

e sp

ecie

s be

ing

dom

inan

t aro

und

the

edge

s of

som

e.

Scat

tere

d am

ongs

t di

suse

d an

d cu

rren

t agr

icul

tura

l la

nd.

- Al

l will

be

used

occ

asio

nally

by

sign

ifica

nt

wat

erbi

rds

but n

one

offe

r im

port

ant o

r lim

iting

reso

urce

s to

any

suc

h. L

arge

, de

nsel

y ve

geta

ted

artif

icia

l wet

land

s on

M

cKird

y’s C

reek

may

repr

esen

t hab

itat

suita

ble

for L

ittle

Bitt

ern

and

Aust

rala

sian

Bi

ttern

.

Dam

s pr

ovid

e pr

imar

y ha

bita

t for

mos

t fr

og s

peci

es w

ithin

the

stud

y ar

ea.

Edge

s of

da

ms

prov

ide

habi

tat f

or R

iver

Sw

amp

Wal

laby

-gra

ss.

Oth

er m

an-m

ade

stru

ctur

es

Oth

er m

an-m

ade

stru

ctur

es a

re s

catte

red

thro

ugh

the

stud

y ar

ea.

Thes

e al

so p

rovi

de s

ome

habi

tat f

eatu

res

for

A co

nstr

ucte

d le

vee

occu

rs a

djac

ent t

o -

Thes

e st

ruct

ures

con

tain

nat

ural

ly re

crui

ted

or p

lant

ed n

ativ

e sp

ecie

s th

at in

som

e

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

Dra

ft fo

r dis

cuss

ion

purp

oses

28

Vege

tati

on o

r ha

bita

t typ

e D

escr

ipti

on

Loca

tion

M

appe

d ar

ea

Sign

ifica

nt v

alue

s

terr

estr

ial v

erte

brat

es.

the

Blue

Scop

e pl

ant s

ite.

Cons

truc

ted

open

dr

ains

occ

ur in

so

me

part

s of

the

stud

y ar

ea.

plac

es fo

rmed

inci

pien

t pla

nt c

omm

uniti

es

that

are

now

nat

ural

ised

and

pro

vidi

ng

habi

tat f

or a

rang

e of

faun

a sp

ecie

s.

Due

to th

eir a

rtifi

cial

con

text

and

rece

nt

deve

lopm

ent,

thei

r hab

itat v

alue

s ca

nnot

be

con

side

red

sign

ifica

nt fo

r the

pe

rsis

tenc

e of

sig

nific

ant s

peci

es w

ithin

the

stud

y ar

ea.

Plan

ted

vege

tati

on

Plan

ted

vege

tatio

n m

ost c

omm

only

occ

urs

in g

arde

ns in

th

e vi

cini

ty o

f hou

ses.

Sc

atte

red

arou

nd

dom

estic

are

as a

nd

alon

g ro

adsi

des.

- Th

ese

area

s ge

nera

lly c

onta

in fe

w h

abita

t va

lues

, as

mos

t ind

igen

ous

faun

a sp

ecie

s in

th

e ar

ea a

re a

dapt

ed to

ope

n gr

assl

and

envi

ronm

ents

. How

ever

, the

se g

arde

ns

may

sup

port

a ra

nge

of c

omm

on n

ativ

e an

d in

trod

uced

bird

spe

cies

, par

ticul

arly

w

hen

in fl

ower

.

Intr

oduc

ed/W

eedy

ve

geta

tion

La

rge

area

s w

ithin

the

agric

ultu

ral p

arts

of B

lueS

cope

su

ppor

t inf

esta

tions

of G

orse

and

Bla

ckbe

rry.

The

se a

reas

fo

rm im

pene

trab

le th

icke

ts a

roun

d th

e pe

rimet

er o

f nat

ive

vege

tatio

n pa

tche

s an

d al

ong

padd

ock

boun

darie

s.

Agric

ultu

ral p

arts

of

Blue

Scop

e.

- Ap

prop

riate

hab

itat f

or S

outh

ern

Brow

n Ba

ndic

oot a

nd s

ome

com

mon

nat

ive

mam

mal

s w

here

con

tiguo

us w

ith

indi

geno

us v

eget

atio

n co

mm

unity

that

is

also

hab

itat f

or re

leva

nt s

peci

es.

Hab

itat

for a

sui

te o

f bird

spe

cies

.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 29

4.3 Significant species and ecological communities

EPBC Act and FFG Act listed species 4.3.1

Lists of EPBC Act and FFG Act listed species recorded or predicted to occur within 5 km of the study area from database searches are provided in Appendix B (flora) and Appendix C (fauna). An assessment of the likelihood of each of these species occurring in the study area and an indication of where within the site (i.e. which habitats or features of relevance to the species) is included. The desktop assessment (Biosis 2014b) outlined a number of species that had a medium or high likelihood of occurrence within the study area. Targeted surveys for these species were undertaken within sample areas of the mapped native vegetation in the current study area and are described in Section 4.3.2 below.

A summary of species recorded during the survey or now still considered to have a medium or higher likelihood of occurring in the study area is provided in Table 3. Based on the conditions observed in the study area during the current surveys some of the species we previously thought to be present are now thought to be unlikely. Species in Table 3 are listed in order of status under the EPBC Act, FFG Act and State Advisory Lists.

Table 3: Summary of listed flora and fauna species most likely to occur in the study area

Species name EPBC Act status

FFG Act status

State Advisory List

Habitats of value within the study area

Survey results

Flora Dense Leek-orchid VU L e Heathy Woodland Not recorded

Green-striped Greenhood

VU L v Heathy Woodland, Damp Heathy Woodland and Lowland Forest

Not recorded, however the surveys commenced near the end of the flowering period of this species.

River Swamp Wallaby-grass

VU Grassy wetlands, Aquatic Herbland

Recorded at several locations (see Figure A2)

Fauna Australasian Bittern EN L en Densely vegetated

freshwater and brackish wetlands

Not recorded

Southern Brown Bandicoot

EN L nt Heathlands and heathy woodlands, other woodlands and forests, weedy areas affording abundant cover

Not recorded

Gull-billed Tern L en Coastal zone in Western Port

Not recorded

Little Egret L en Coastal zone in Western Port and freshwater wetlands

Not recorded

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 30

Species name EPBC Act status

FFG Act status

State Advisory List

Habitats of value within the study area

Survey results

Lewin's Rail L vu Densely vegetated wetlands

Recorded

Baillon's Crake L vu Densely vegetated wetlands

Not recorded

Eastern Great Egret L vu Coastal zone in Western Port and freshwater wetlands

Recorded

White-bellied Sea-Eagle

L vu Coastal zone in Western Port and freshwater wetlands

Not recorded

Swamp Skink L vu Coastal Saltmarsh, damp woodlands and heathlands, Swamp Scrub, Estuarine Scrub

Not recorded

White-footed Dunnart L nt Healthlands and heathy woodlands

Not recorded

Southern Toadlet v Low-lying damp areas including in woodlands

Survey season not appropriate for detection of this species

Glossy Grass Skink nt Damp areas with dense vegetation such as drainage lines and soaks. The fringes of coastal saltmarshes.

Not recorded

Latham's Snipe nt Grassy wetlands, Aquatic Herbland

Not recorded

Common Long-necked Turtle

dd Natural and man-made waterbodies

Recorded

Notes to table:

EPBC Act: CR - Critically Endangered EN - Endangered VU – Vulnerable

State Advisory List (Flora): e - endangered v - vulnerable r - rare k - poorly known

FFG Act: L - listed as threatened under FFG Act P - protected under the FFG Act (public land only)

State Advisory List (Fauna):

ex - extinct cr - critically endangered en - endangered vu - vulnerable nt - near threatened dd - data deficient rx - regionally extinct

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 31

Targeted survey results 4.3.2

The following provides a brief outline of species that were the focus of targeted surveys in the current survey. For each species the status code under the EPBC Act, FFG Act or the State Advisory List is provided in brackets.

Flora

Dense Leek-orchid (VU, e) was not recorded during the current survey. The species typically occupies heathy vegetation. It is strongly dependant on an appropriate fire regime to stimulate growth of above ground parts. It typically flowers prolifically in spring following fire and then to a lesser extent in a small number of successive seasons. Given the absence of fire for several years from the heathy vegetation surveyed, it is not unexpected that this species was not detected. The vegetation can be regarded as providing optimal habitat for this species, and while this species was not recorded during the targeted surveys, the absence of individuals during the survey does not preclude its presence in the study area. The nearest records of this species are from Crib Point where several plants have been recorded. Following targeted surveys in areas of most suitable habitat, we consider there to be medium likelihood that Dense Leek-orchid inhabits part of the study area.

Green-striped Greenhood (VU, L, v) was not recorded during the current survey. The species occupies a range of mostly forest and woodland vegetation types. The targeted surveys commenced towards the end of the flowering seasons for this species. Areas of Damp Heathy Woodland and some other vegetation can be regarded as suitable habitat. The nearest records are attributed to French Island although they have poor spatial accuracy. The fruiting material of a number of plants identified in the broader species group (Pterostylis longifolia) was observed in parts of the Heathy Woodland in BlueScope. The material was insufficient for an accurate determination of the species. We consider it possible that Green-striped Greenhood inhabits parts of the study area and survey is required at the appropriate time of year to determine this.

River Swamp Wallaby-grass (VU) was recorded in a number of wetland areas within BlueScope including farm dams, open areas of Swamp Scrub and larger patches of Wetland Formation. This species was recorded by Biosis during surveys in BlueScope in 2014, but has otherwise been seldom recorded on the Mornington Peninsula.

Purple Eyebright (EN, L, e) was not recorded during the current survey. The nearest record of this species is from approximately 10 km to the west where it was recorded in 1986. The majority of records for this species on the peninsula are from Greens Bush and Arthurs Seat. There are several areas of heathy and grassy vegetation within the study area where this species could be expected to occur. However, it is more readily detected following fire or other disturbance resulting in open, sun-lit vegetation (Murphy and Downe 2006). Most areas of native vegetation within the study area have not been subject to such disturbance for some time. The resulting closed structure of the vegetation prevents the detectability of this species. Following targeted surveys in areas of most suitable habitat, we consider it unlikelythat Purple Eyebright inhabits the study area.

Clover Glycine (VU, L, v) was not recorded during the current survey. It typically occupies grassy vegetation including grassland, grassy woodland and grassy forest (DoE 2014). Areas of Grassy Woodland within the study area are the most likely areas where this species would occur. In the absence of flowers it is easily overlooked due to its size and as it tends to grow amongst grass tussocks and other herbaceous plants. The closest record of this species (2009) occurs on the northwest corner of French Island. Following targeted surveys in areas of most suitable habitat, we consider it unlikely that Clover Glycine inhabits the study area.

Matted Flax-lily (EN, L, e) was not recorded during the current survey. The species typically occupies grassy woodland vegetation. Plants can be difficult to detect amongst other graminoids and when

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 32

not flowering. Survey was undertaken during suitable conditions and at the appropriate time of year. The nearest records of this species are from VicTrack rail land in Clyde to the north of the study area, where they occur in Grassy Woodland. There are no historical records within the Hastings or Tyabb areas. Following targeted surveys in areas of most suitable habitat, we consider there to be low likelihood that Matted Flax-lily inhabits part of the study area.

Swamp Everlasting (VU, L, v) was not recorded during the current survey. The species typically occupies grassy wetland areas, which are present within the study area. It is a relatively large herb with persistent yellow bracts at the base of its flower-heads. It is conspicuous where present and unlikely to be overlooked, particularly when flowering. The nearest records of this species are from VicTrack rail land in Clyde to the north of the study area. There are no historical records within the Hastings or Tyabb areas. Following targeted surveys in areas of most suitable habitat, we consider it unlikely that Swamp Everlasting inhabits the study area.

Swamp Fireweed (VU, v) was not recorded during the current survey. The species typically occupies wetland vegetation. It is a relatively large forb which is usually conspicuous where present, when wetlands are sufficiently watered. The nearest records of this species are from VicTrack rail land in Clyde to the north of the study area. There are no historical records within the Hastings or Tyabb areas. Following targeted surveys in areas of most suitable habitat, we consider it unlikely that Swamp Fireweed inhabits the study area.

Purple Diuris (L, v) was not recorded during the current survey. The species typically occupies Grassy Woodland and the study area provides suitable habitat for this species. When flowering it has large conspicuous purple flowers that are unlikely to be overlooked during survey. The nearest record of this species is at Crib Point. It may be found under a suitable disturbance regime. In particular the absence of fire in recent years may be contributing to it not being detected within the study area. Other records occur in the west of the Mornington Peninsula around Mt Martha and further to the north at Langwarrin. Following targeted surveys in areas of most suitable habitat, we consider it unlikely that Purple Diuris inhabits part of the study area.

Fauna

Southern Brown Bandicoot (EN, L, nt) was not detected with certainty during the present investigation. Camera surveys were the primary mechanism used to survey for this species. Active observation for bandicoot diggings was also undertaken. A possible observation of a single Southern Brown Bandicoot was made during active searching involving turning of metal debris from an old car close to the location of camera 17 (see Map A4a), although the animal was not captured and its identity could not be verified. All EVCs throughout the study area appear to be suitable for the species and it has been recorded from the local area near Yaringa in recent years. Following targeted surveys in areas of suitable habitat, we consider there is still a high likelihood that Southern Brown Bandicoots inhabit parts of the study area.

Growling Grass Frog (VU, L, en) was not detected during the present investigation, although survey conditions were ideal and a variety of other frog species was recorded. Habitat was evaluated at 18 wetlands. All were farm dams and no natural freshwater wetlands suitable for the species exist within the study area. Ten wetlands were considered to offer potential habitat for Growling Grass Frog and were subject to nocturnal surveys entailing listening for characteristic calls of the species and the use of call playback and spotlight investigations. There are two old records of the species that appear to be from, or close to, the north of the study area, but few previous records from the local area generally. Following targeted surveys in areas of suitable habitat, we consider there is a low likelihood that Growling Grass Frogs inhabit the study area.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 33

New Holland Mouse (VU, L, vu) was not detected during the present investigation. Elliott trapping was used to survey for New Holland Mice. It was recorded during the 1970s and early 1980s from heathy vegetation communities near Hastings, apparently including from the study area. Seebeck & Menkhorst (2000) considered that it had become extinct on the Mornington Peninsula within the preceding 15 years and it has been documented to have become locally extinct at a number of other Victorian locations. Vegetation communities within the study area are appropriate but appear to be too long unburnt to be suitable for the species. Following targeted surveys in areas of suitable habitat, we consider there is a low likelihood that the New Holland Mouse inhabits the study area.

Swamp Skink (L, vu) and Glossy Grass Skink (nt) were not detected during the present investigation. Elliott trapping and active searching were used to survey for these skinks. There are multiple records of both species from the Hastings area and damp portions of EVCs throughout the study area, including saltmarsh communities, are suitable for these species. Following targeted surveys in areas of suitable habitat, we consider there is a high likelihood that both species inhabit the study area.

Lace Monitor (vu) was not detected during the present investigation. Active searching in woodland EVCs was the primary survey technique for this species. There are very few records of the species from Mornington Peninsula or the former Koo-wee-rup Swamp catchment of Western Port. Whilst woodland communities within the study area appear suitable for Lace Monitors, the species may be naturally absent from the local area or now exist there at a very low density. Following surveys in areas of suitable habitat, we consider there is a low likelihood that Lace Monitors inhabit the study area.

White-footed Dunnart (L, nt) was not detected during the present investigation. Camera surveys and Elliott trapping were used to survey for White-footed Dunnarts. All EVCs throughout the study area appear to be suitable, however it is possible that the long-unburnt advanced successional stage of the various vegetation communities does not meet the habitat requirements of the species. A population has been documented from the Somers, Crib Point and Stony Point area south of Hastings. The lack of previous records from the study area and its immediate vicinity may reflect a lack of survey effort. Following targeted surveys in areas of suitable habitat, we consider there is a medium likelihood that the White-footed Dunnart inhabits parts of the study area.

Latham's Snipe (nt) was not detected during the present investigation however, Latham's Snipe are highly mobile and the area contains suitable habitat. Observations were made at multiple areas of low-lying pasture and in suitable vegetation around the margins of artificial wetlands. Following targeted surveys in areas of suitable habitat, we consider there is a high likelihood that this migratory species will occur in portions of the study area on occasions.

EPBC Act listed ecological communities 4.3.3

The study area contains two ecological communities listed under the EBPC Act: Subtropical and Temperate Coastal Saltmarsh, and Seasonal Herbaceous Wetland (Freshwater) of the Temperate Lowland Plains.

There are 43.4 ha of Subtropical and Temperate Coastal Saltmarsh (Figure A2 and Appendix D). This community is listed as vulnerable under the EPBC Act. The Coastal Saltmarsh ecological community corresponds with two EVCs that are limited to the coastal bioregions in Victoria (DSEWPaC 2013a):

EVC 9 Coastal Saltmarsh aggregate, and

EVC 10 Estuarine Wetland.

EVC 9 is recognised to be an aggregate mapping unit that comprises a variety of shrubby to herbaceous to grassy/sedge vegetation.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 34

The listed community within the study area is represented by a large contiguous patch around the tidal zone of Western Port's shoreline. There are few weed species in Victoria that succeed in saltmarsh vegetation and the examples within the study area are largely free of weeds. Due to their condition and size, areas of the EVCs Coastal Saltmarsh and Estuarine Wetland mapped in the study area have been used to determine the boundaries of the EPBC Act listed community Subtropical and Temperate Coastal Saltmarsh.

There are 3 ha of Seasonal Herbaceous Wetland (Freshwater) of the Temperate Lowland Plains (hereafter referred to as Seasonal Herbaceous Wetlands) in the study area located south of Denham Road within the BlueScope property (Figure A2). This community is listed as critically endangered under the EPBC Act. The ecological community corresponds with the EVC 125 Plains Grassy Wetland, parts of EVC 74 Wetland Formation and EVC 653 Aquatic Herbland.

Seasonal Herbaceous Wetlands are temporary freshwater wetlands that are inundated on a seasonal basis, typically filling after winter-spring rains, and then drying out. The vegetation is generally treeless and dominated by a herbaceous ground layer, often with a considerable graminoid component and with forbs present. The herbaceous species present are characteristic of wetter locations and are typically absent or uncommon in any adjoining dryland grasslands and woodlands (DSEWPac 2012).

Modifications to other types of wetland may result in the ecological community being present where it was formerly absent. These modified wetland sites are included as part of the national ecological community, if they remain a functional natural wetland and conform to the description of the ecological community.

The definition of the ecological community excludes the mapped EVC 135 Sedge Wetland.

FFG Act listed community 4.3.4

The areas of Seasonal Herbaceous Wetlands that occur within the study area would also meet the definition of the FFG Act listed community Herb-rich Plains Grassy Wetland (West Gippsland). This community typically occurs in shallow seasonal wetlands that fill in winter and spring and are dry by summer. Some may retain water for longer periods, but typically only have surface water for up to six months. The community contains a rich plant association of grasses, sedges and aquatic herbs.

This community is characterized by a strong zonation pattern from emergent sedges, grasses and amphibious herbs in the fringing/littoral zone, through to deeper water dominated by submergent species together with a few sedges. Within the study area species typical of the fringing zone, and subject to shallow inundation, include Common Tussock-grass (Poa labillardierei) and Common Spike-sedge (Eleocharis acuta). This zone also supports a suite of other species including Joint-leaf Rush (Juncus holoschoenus), Running Marsh-flower (Villarsia reniformis), Prickfoot (Eryngium vesiculosum), Floating Club-sedge (Isolepis fluitans), Small Loosestrife (Lythrum hyssopifolia), Poison Lobelia (Lobelia pratoides) and Small Spike-sedge (Eleocharis pusilla). The fringing zone may include Swamp Daisy (Allitia cardiocarpa). The central zone, when inundated, is dominated by Common Spike Sedge (Eleocharis acuta) in association with Australian Sweet-grass (Glyceria australis) and/or swamp wallaby grasses (Amphibromus nervosus and A. fluitans). Other plants that may be abundant in this zone include Water Purslane (Neopaxia australasica), Running Marsh-flower, Soft Twig-sedge (Baumea arthrophylla), pondweeds Potamogeton spp., Water Ribbons (Triglochin procerum), Buttercup (Ranunculus spp.) and Water-milfoil (Myriophyllum spp).

Shrubs, where present, tend to be sparse and only on the fringe of the community. These may include Blackwood (Acacia melanoxylon), Swamp Paperbark (Melaleuca ericifolia) and Prickly Tea-tree (Leptospermum continentale).

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 35

4.4 Habitat hectares

The extent of native vegetation patches and the number of scattered trees were mapped within the study area (Figure A2) and the condition was assessed using standard methods provided by DSE (2004). The condition of native vegetation was assessed using the DSE Vegetation Quality Assessment Sheet (DSE 2004) and pre-determined EVC benchmarks.

Areas of uniform quality for each EVC within the patches are termed ‘habitat zones’ and are assessed separately. The condition score of the habitat zone is multiplied by the extent of the zone to give a value in Habitat hectares.

A total of 22 habitat zones were identified during surveys with a total of 258.7 habitat hectares recorded. The results of the condition assessment are provided in Table 4, with the number of habitat hectares in each habitat zone. The habitat zone identification numbers for each patch of vegetation are illustrated in Figure A2.

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

Dra

ft fo

r dis

cuss

ion

purp

oses

36

Tabl

e 4:

Hab

itat

hec

tare

s of

nat

ive

vege

tati

on w

ithi

n th

e st

udy

area

EVC

#: N

ame

EVC

3: D

amp

Sand

s H

erb-

rich

Woo

dlan

d

EVC

9:

Coas

tal

Saltm

arsh

EVC

10:

Estu

arin

e W

etla

nd

EVC

48: H

eath

y W

oodl

and

EVC

53: S

wam

p Sc

rub

EVC

74:

Wet

land

Fo

rmat

ion

/ EVC

136

: Se

dge

Wet

land

EVC

83:

Swam

py

Ripa

rian

Woo

dlan

d

EVC

125:

Pl

ains

G

rass

y W

etla

nd

EVC

140:

M

angr

ove

Shru

blan

d

EVC

175:

G

rass

y W

oodl

and

EVC

653:

Aq

uatic

H

erbl

and

EVC

710:

D

amp

Hea

thla

nd

EVC

793:

Dam

p H

eath

y W

oodl

and

EVC

953:

Es

tuar

ine

Scru

b

EVC

973:

Sw

ampy

W

oodl

and

Tota

ls

Hab

itat

Zon

e ID

# (F

igur

e A

2)

1 2

7 16

18

5

11

12

15

17

19

13

21

6 10

22

14

3

4 9

8 20

Max

. sc

ore

Scor

e Sc

ore

Scor

e Sc

ore

Scor

e Sc

ore

Scor

e Sc

ore

Scor

e Sc

ore

Scor

e Sc

ore

Scor

e Sc

ore

Scor

e Sc

ore

Scor

e Sc

ore

Scor

e Sc

ore

Scor

e Sc

ore

Site

Co

ndit

ion

Larg

e O

ld T

rees

10

10

10

10

-

- 10

0

- -

- 4

- -

10

3 -

- 10

10

-

4 -

Cano

py C

over

5

5 5

3 -

- 5

5 3

3 -

3 -

- 3

3 -

- 5

5 3

3 -

Lack

of W

eeds

15

2

11

11

11

11

15

7 11

11

7

11

11

5 15

13

7

11

11

11

13

11

7

Und

erst

orey

25

20

20

15

25

20

20

20

15

20

20

15

20

25

20

15

15

20

25

15

25

15

15

Recr

uitm

ent

10

10

10

10

6 6

10

10

10

10

6 5

6 10

10

6

6 10

10

10

6

10

6

Org

anic

Mat

ter

5 5

5 5

3 5

5 3

5 5

5 5

5 5

5 5

5 3

5 5

3 4

5

Logs

5

3 5

5 -

- 5

4 -

- -

3 -

- 5

4 -

- 5

5 5

5 -

Tota

l Site

Sco

re

55

66

59

45

42

70

49

44

49

45

46

42

45

68

49

33

44

71

61

55

52

33

EVC

Stan

dard

iser

(x 7

5/55

) 1

1 1

1.37

1.

37

1 1

1.25

1.

25

1.37

1

1.37

1.

37

1 1

1.37

1.

36

1 1

1.16

1

1.37

Adj

uste

d Si

te S

core

55

66

59

62

58

70

49

55

61

62

46

58

62

68

49

45

60

71

61

64

52

45

Land

scap

e Va

lue

Patc

h Si

ze

10

8 8

8 8

8 8

8 8

4 8

8 1

8 1

8 4

8 8

8 8

8 4

Nei

ghbo

urho

od

10

3 5

5 6

5 3

5 5

4 5

5 8

5 1

5 4

5 5

5 5

5 4

Dis

tanc

e to

Cor

e 5

4 4

4 4

4 5

4 4

4 4

4 4

4 5

4 4

4 4

4 4

4 4

Tota

l Lan

dsca

pe S

core

15

17

17

18

17

16

17

17

12

17

17

13

17

7

17

12

17

17

17

17

17

12

HA

BITA

T SC

ORE

10

0 70

83

76

80

76

86

66

72

73

76

63

71

79

75

66

57

77

88

78

81

69

57

Hab

itat

poi

nts

= #/

100

1 0.

7 0.

83

0.76

0.

8 0.

76

0.86

0.

66

0.72

0.

73

0.76

0.

63

0.71

0.

79

0.75

0.

66

0.57

0.

77

0.88

0.

78

0.81

0.

69

0.57

Hab

itat

Zon

e ar

ea (h

a)

6.6

52.4

3.

6 39

.3

4.1

14

21.8

8.

8 0.

2 10

.4

1.8

1.1

33.3

19

.9

13.4

0.

4 9.

1 27

.7

24.2

34

.3

2.9

0.7

330

Hab

itat

hec

tare

s (H

ha)

4.6

43.5

2.

7 31

.4

3.1

12

14.4

6.

3 0.

2 7.

9 1.

1 0.

8 26

.3

14.9

8.

8 0.

2 7

24.4

18

.9

27.8

2

0.4

258.

7

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 37

4.5 Other ecological values

Western Port Ramsar wetland 4.5.1

In 1982, a large portion of Western Port was designated as a wetland of international importance under the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat (Ramsar Convention). The site consists of large shallow intertidal areas and a narrow strip of adjacent coastal land within parts of Western Port.

The Ramsar wetland is recognised for its diversity of native flora and fauna, particularly for its ability to support diverse assemblages of waterbirds and wetland vegetation, including seagrass, saltmarsh and mangroves. Australia is obliged to manage Ramsar wetlands so as to maintain their ecological character, remain informed of any changes to their character, and notify the Ramsar Secretariat of any changes at the earliest opportunity.

The saltmarsh and mangrove communities of the study area and some adjacent coastal areas are located within the boundary of the Western Port Ramsar wetland (Figure A2) and adjacent to the site. Therefore assessment and efforts to minimise adverse impacts of the Project on the character of the Ramsar wetland would be required.

Locally or regionally significant flora species 4.5.2

A small number of species that were recorded during this assessment, whilst not considered state or nationally threatened, are notable for being uncommon locally or within the Port Philip and Western Port region, or for having biogeographic interest:

Allocasuarina paradoxa Green Sheoke is a Victorian and South Australian species with disjunct sub-arid and coastal humid populations. Damp Heathland within BlueScope provides suitable habitat for this species. While it is well reserved to the north of Mornington Peninsula and on French Island, it is poorly represented on the peninsula.

Cassinia trinerva Three-veined Cassinia is a species of ranges in the southern Great Dividing Range, Strzelecki Ranges and East Gippsland. It was recorded in a drainage line within the study area and extends the western most limit of its distribution within Victoria.

Entolasia stricta Upright Panic is a sparsely distributed and largely coastal species. It is represented in the Western Port area by only a small number of records, mainly on the eastern side of the bay. Where recorded it forms spreading patches in peaty soils.

Eryngium vesiculosum Prickfoot is a herbaceous species which typically grows in grassy wet areas on heavy clay soils. These habitats are more common around Melbourne to the north of the study area an on the coastal and basalt plains of western Victoria. There are very few records of this species on the Mornington Peninsula and Western Port area where its habitat is restricted to small isolated occurrences.

Leptoceras menziesii Hare Orchid is represented by a small number of records on the Mornington Peninsula and Western Port, of which some are more than 20 years old. It was recorded within BlueScope land during the current assessment where a population of many individuals was found. This species typically flowers prolifically following fire.

Orthoceras strictum Horned Orchid is sparsely distribution on the Mornington Peninsula and Westerport Bay areas. There are 10 existing records of which the most recent is from 2003 on French Island; all other records are more than 20 years old. The record taken during the current assessment

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 38

provides important information about a previously unreported population on the peninsula. It was recorded on disturbed soil and adjacent to saltmarsh vegetation.

Pultenaea daphnoides Large-leaf Bush-pea was recorded on a levee to the east of the BlueScope plant site. This species is relatively common on French Island and Arthurs Seat, although otherwise uncommon on the Mornington Peninsula.

Thelymitra juncifolia Rush-leaf Sun-orchid was recorded within BlueScope land. There are a small number of other records of this orchid on the Mornington Peninsula and several on French Island. The records from this assessment add to existing records at Crib Point for the broader Hastings area.

Xanthosia huegelii Heath Xanthosia is distributed along the southern coast of the mainland. It is represented by only two records in the Port Phillip and Western Port areas.

The abovementioned species are worthy of planning consideration as the study area provides regionally important and high quality habitat for their ongoing persistence. These species whilst not listed under the EPBC Act or the FFG Act may need to be considered for a planning permit.

NaturePrint and Strategic Biodiversity Score 4.5.3

Within this flora and fauna assessment the values of the study area are assessed for their biodiversity values against standard criteria. These include the presence of listed species or communities that have statutory planning weight. Relevant State and Commonwealth government authorities also use other criteria to assess biodiversity value. A statewide assessment of biodiversity values, threatening processes and ecosystem function has been modelled and mapped for all parts of Victoria. The resulting product NaturePrint (http://www.depi.vic.gov.au/environment-and-wildlife/biodiversity/natureprint) considers threatened species habitat, vegetation condition and a range of other biodiversity variables to indicate the relative importance of a site in Victoria, compared to all other areas of the State. Its intent is to provide quantification of these values for strategic planning and assessment against other project values.

The majority of land within BlueScope is ranked as the second highest category of contribution to natural values in Victoria in NaturePrint. Many areas fringing the shoreline have the highest possible contribution for the state. Areas of native vegetation further inland fragmented by agricultural uses have moderate to low contribution, although most areas within the study area make some contribution to the state's biodiversity. A subset of variables from NaturePrint are used for Victoria's Strategic Biodiversity Map, which is another model explaining biodiversity importance, although more heavily weighted towards threatened species presence and habitat. The Strategic Biodiversity Score (a score between 0 and 1) requires consideration under all Victorian planning schemes where removal of native vegetation is proposed. The score from this model gives a similar view of the value of native vegetation within the study area. Within this model BlueScope and its surrounds have a score of >0.8 while more fragmented areas of the landscape have a score between 0.2 and 0.6.

NaturePrint provides a summary of the interaction of values and processes that are associated with an area of native vegetation. The terms of ecological and spatial values used in the model are complex and combine the richness of the vegetation, the size of patches, their connectivity in the landscape, their capacity to support significant species and their rarity within Victoria, amongst other things. The larger blocks of native vegetation within the study area have been modelled as significant within the State, or as having high strategic biodiversity value. Observations from the current field assessments endorse the output from these models.

The vegetation within BlueScope and other larger blocks are relatively intact examples of their constituent ecosystems. Their ranking is considered with regard to previous land use disturbance, present surrounding land use and a number of ecological considerations. Generally the vegetation types assessed have low

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 39

fertility and, for their area, have high plant species diversity. All but the immediate coastal fringe vegetation has a regeneration cycle which is fire driven. The capacity for fire of appropriate frequency and intensity to further improve the ecological value of the native vegetation is noted in the current assessment of biodiversity values.

The intact nature of the ecological communities in the study area and the absence of large-scale adverse disturbance processes make them resilient to natural disturbance and encroachment of introduced plant and animals. It is probable that past disturbance of the broader surrounding landscape may have caused the decline or loss of some fauna species (e.g. Southern Brown Bandicoot, Brown 2010) within BlueScope. However, high densities of some other native mammals, good bird diversity and presence of a range of habitat types indicate the persistence of other important ecological processes that are not retained in surrounding agricultural areas. Restricted access into BlueScope and some other areas of the study area has resulted in these areas showing few signs of disease such as tree dieback or fungal infections that lead to broad scale impacts on vegetation.

The BlueScope property and the adjoining areas of coastal vegetation within the study area can be regarded as one of the most important sites for biodiversity in the Port Phillip and Western Port area. Despite its much smaller area, the diversity of its vegetation types is comparable with that of French Island. It provides an important western range limit of the Western Port Biosphere including examples of communities that extend across French Island to other significant blocks that fringe the Biosphere; within the inlets of KooWeeRup Swamp, Holden Proving Ground, Grantville, and Adams Creek Nature Conservation Reserve.

4.6 Implications under State and Commonwealth Legislation

EPBC Act 4.6.1

The flora and fauna assessment results show that MNES listed under the EPBC Act exist or may sometimes utilise the habitats within the study area. These include listed threatened flora and fauna species, two ecological communities, listed migratory species (DEWHA 2009c) and the Western Port wetland of international importance (Ramsar).

The Project would therefore need to be referred under the EPBC Act to the Minister for Environment for a decision on whether the Project has the potential to impact MNES, and therefore constitute a controlled action. The Authority is anticipating that the Project will be declared a controlled action, as it is being proposed within a Ramsar wetland and is likely to substantially modify an area of the wetland among other terrestrial MNES.

The EPBC Act offset policy (DSEWPaC 2013b) prescribes offsets as mitigation for residual impacts on MNES following actions to avoid or minimise impacts, and therefore offsets are likely to be required for the Project. It is recommended that calculations of likely offsets to be required to compensate for vegetation clearing as a result of the Project are made at an early stage, to ascertain whether offsets for the scale of impacts on a large area of high biodiversity values would be realistically achievable.

FFG Act 4.6.2

One FFG Act listed community, Herb-rich Plains Grassy Wetland (West Gippsland) has been identified within BlueScope in addition to listed fauna species. A permit under the FFG Act would therefore be required with respect to the Crown land parcels. A permit is generally not required for private land.

CaLP Act 4.6.3

Declared noxious weeds and established pest animals listed under the CaLP Act identified in the study area during the survey are listed in Appendices B (flora) and C (fauna). The land owner must take all reasonable

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 40

steps to eradicate regionally prohibited weeds, prevent the growth and spread of regionally controlled weeds, and prevent the spread of and as far as possible eradicate established pest animals.

Planning and Environment Act 1987 (incl. Planning Schemes) 4.6.4

One of the Applicable Approvals relevant to biodiversity that may be sought for the Project under the MTPF Act includes a planning scheme amendment under the Planning and Environment Act 1987.

In addition, Clause 52.17 (Native Vegetation) requires a planning permit to remove, destroy or lop native vegetation including some dead native vegetation. Under Clause 66.02 a permit application to remove, destroy or lop native vegetation is required to be referred to DELWP as a recommending referral authority if any of the following apply:

the area of native vegetation to be removed is greater than 0.5 hectares

the class of application is on the high risk-based pathway

a property vegetation precinct plan applies to the site or

the native vegetation is on Crown land occupied or managed by the Responsible Authority.

This assessment has identified approximately 330 ha of native vegetation within the study area. Due to the likely scale of the Project, it is considered that a permit under the Act would be required to remove native vegetation.

State Advisory list of rare or threatened species 4.6.5

For any proposal to remove native vegetation from the study area, habitat for one or more state threatened species is likely to be impacted. If the impact to that species at state level exceeds certain thresholds a 'specific offset' would be be required in addition to 'general offsets' (refer Appendix E).

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 41

5. Conclusion

5.1 Key biodiversity values

Key ecological values identified within the study area are as follows:

approximately 330 ha of native vegetation including large, high quality, intact patches of woodland, and coastal EVCs, scattered remant trees, and regionally significant coastal-inland ecosystem gradients

shallow intertidal habitats, mangroves, saltmarsh and adjacent coastal land which form a significant component of the internationally important Western Port Ramsar wetland

approximately 43.4 ha of the EPBC Act listed ecological community: Subtropical and Temperate Coastal Saltmarsh and approximately 3 ha of the EPBC Act listed community: Seasonal Herbaceous Wetland (Freshwater) of the Temperate Lowland Plains

a population of the EPBC Act listed flora species River Swamp Wallaby-grass (Amphibromus fluitans), twelve State Advisory List species and three FFG Act listed fauna species

potential presence of additional EPBC Act, State Advisory List and FFG Act listed species and suitable habitats for them.

The highest value areas of native vegetation are the large, high quality, intact areas of woodland and coastal saltmarsh vegetation located in the northern and eastern parts of BlueScope as well as heathy woodland in the Gordon Rolfe Reserve. The contiguous woodland and estuarine scrub vegetation within BlueScope grades into extensive saltmarsh and mangrove habitats of Western Port which also form a significant part of ecological character of the Western Port Ramsar wetland.

This occurrence of a large intact area of native vegetation is rare on the Mornington Peninsula and provides habitat to a diverse range of flora and fauna, which is otherwise absent from parts of the Peninsula. This significance is also reflected in NaturePrint which ranks the majority of land within BlueScope in the second highest category of contribution to natural values in Victoria. Many areas fringing the shoreline have the highest possible contribution for the state.

The results of the assessment of native vegetation condition indicate that patches are in relatively high condition with a total of 258 habitat hectares calculated from the study area.

Cryptic and disturbance adapted species such as some of the listed orchid species were not recorded during the current study, however, habitat within the study area is suitable for these species and their presence cannot be discounted due to a long absence of fire from the study area.

5.2 Avoidance and minimisation of biodiversity impacts

The largest patches of native vegetation and those that are contiguous with other such patches both within the study area and beyond it offer the most significant flora and fauna values. Loss or fragmentation of such areas is likely to be detrimental to the species and ecosystems they support.

As a general principle, impacts on MNES (as defined under the EPBC Act) should firstly be avoided, then minimised and this must be demonstrated through the approval process. Residual adverse impacts that cannot be avoided must be offset in accordance with the EPBC Act Environmental Offsets Policy (DSEWPaC 2013b). Biosis (2013b) provided an overview of the EPBC Act Offsets Policy as it may relate to the Project.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 42

Similarly, the objective of Victoria's Biodiversity Assessment Guidelines is to achieve "no net loss in the contribution made by native vegetation to Victoria's biodiversity" and requires the implementation of key strategies as follows:

avoiding the removal of native vegetation that makes a significant contribution to Victoria's biodiversity

minimising impacts to Victoria's biodiversity from the removal of native vegetation

where native vegetation is permitted to be removed, ensuring it is offset in a manner that makes a contribution to Victoria's biodiversity that is equivalent to the contribution made by the native vegetation to be removed.

5.3 Considerations for project design

The intention of this report is to document existing biodiversity values within the area assessed. At the time of preparation of this report a detailed port design is not available and an impact assessment is therefore not feasible. Nonetheless, planning for project infrastructure layout should give consideration to:

design options which avoid or minimise direct or indirect impacts on the Western Port Ramsar site including its foreshore habitats

design options that avoid or minimise removal of remnant native vegetation and scattered native trees, particularly larger areas of intact vegetation such as those within BlueScope Steel land, by locating infrastructure in previously cleared land or predominantly non-native vegetation (e.g. existing transport corridors, urban areas and non-native agricultural areas)

design options that avoid fragmentation of native vegetation patches, and avoid severance of important vegetation and habitat linkages

the potential challenges and costs associated with locating and securing sufficient offsets for biodiversity assets that cannot be protected on-site (as required to comply with relevant State and Commonwealth offset policies).

5.4 Further surveys

The surveys reported here were undertaken in a season not suitable for detection of all target species. Further surveys are recommended for detection of Southern Toadlet in autumn, Orange-bellied Parrot between April and September inclusive, and Green-striped Greenhood during August to early September.

The survey reported here is one of a number of field investigations planned to be undertaken for the project. Other investigations not yet undertaken include assessment of the biodiversity values of the balance of land within SUZ1 and the waterbirds of Western Port. These further studies may provide information that further refines understanding of aspects covered by the present report.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 43

References

AECOM 2013. Western Port Highway Planning Study – Ballarto Road to Hodgins Road: Desktop Flora and Fauna Assessment. Report to VicRoads. Author: White, C. AECOM, Melbourne. Job No. 60308273.

Biosis 2013a. Esso Pipeline Replacement Project –Longford to Hastings: Flora and fauna survey and impact mitigation. Report to Worley Parsons. Authors: Dell, M., Sofo, K., Byrne A. & Smales I. Biosis Pty Ltd, Melbourne. Project 16955/16956.

Biosis 2013b. Briefing paper: Legislative process for offsets related to Port of Hastings development. Report to Port of Hastings Development Authority. Authors: Westcott, V, Dell, M, Smales I and Harvey, A. Biosis Pty Ltd, Melbourne. Project no. 16681.

Biosis 2014a. Port of Hastings Development Authority: Flora and fauna assessment for the geophysical and geotechnical surveys. Report to Port of Hastings Development Authority. Authors: Mueck S. and Smales I. Biosis Pty Ltd, Melbourne. Project no. 17228.

Biosis 2014b. Port of Hastings: SUZ1 and Land Transport Corridor, Desktop Flora and Fauna Assessment. Report for AECOM and GHD Joint Venture. Authors: Dell M, Kay K and Gilmore D – Biosis; Harrow, S, Lind P. - GHD. Biosis Pty Ltd, Melbourne. Project no. 18568.

Biosis 2014c. Port of Hastings: Waterbirds Desktop Review. Report for AECOM and GHD Joint Venture. Author: Smales, I. Biosis Pty Ltd, Melbourne. Project no. 19147.

Biosis Research 2009. Flora and fauna assessment of Port of Hastings Stage One Investigation area, Victoria. Report to AECOM Pty Ltd. Authors: Venosta, M., Mueck, S. and Bloink, C. Biosis Research Pty Ltd, Melbourne. Project no. 7540 & 7930.

Biosis Research 2011. Port of Hastings Stage 1 Investigation Area: Threatened flora and fauna survey and habitat hectare assessment. Report to Port of Melbourne Corporation. Authors: Venosta, M., Mueck, S. and Bloink, C. Biosis Research Pty Ltd, Melbourne. Matter No. 11173.

Biosis Research 2012. Scoping framework for the terrestrial ecological assessment of the expansion of the Port of Hastings. Report to Major Projects Victoria. Author: Venosta, M. Biosis Research, Melbourne. Matter No. 14062.

Brown GW. 2010. National Recovery Plan for the Southern Brown Bandicoot Isoodon obesulus obesulus. Draft for Comment. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria.

Boon P, Allen T, Brook J, Carr G, Frood D, Harty C, Hoye J, McMahon A, Mathews S, Rosengren N, Sinclair S, White M and Yugovic J 2011. Mangroves and coastal saltmarsh of Victoria. Distribution, condition, threats and management. Institute for Sustainability and Innovation, Victoria University, Melbourne.

Carter O. 2010. National Recovery Plan for the Matted Flax-lily Dianella amoena. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria.

Carter O and Walsh N. 2011. National Recovery Plan for the Swamp Everlasting Xerochrysum palustre. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.

Coates F, Jeanes J and Pritchard A. 2002. Recovery Plan for Twenty-five Threatened Orchids of Victoria, South Australia and New South Wales 2003 - 2007. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.

Cogger H. 2014. Reptiles and Amphibians of Australia (7th edition). CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 44

DELWP 2015. Biodiversity Interactive Maps. http://mapshare2.dse.vic.gov.au/MapShare2EXT/imf.jsp?site=bim. Last accessed 08/01/15.

DEPI 2012. Victorian Biodiversity Atlas ‘VBA_FAUNA25, FAUNA100 & FAUNARestricted, FLORA25, FLORA100 & FLORARestricted’ August 2012. Victorian Government Department of Sustainability & Environment, Melbourne.

DEPI 2013a. Advisory List of Threatened Vertebrate Fauna in Victoria – 2013. Victorian Government Department of Environment & Primary Industries, Melbourne.

DEPI 2013b. Permitted clearing of native vegetation - Biodiversity assessment guidelines. Victorian Government Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Melbourne (September 2013).

DEPI 2013c. Sub-Regional Species Strategy for the Growling Grass Frog. The Victorian Government Department of Environment and Primary Industries, East Melbourne.

DEPI 2013d. Advisory List of Rare or Threatened Plants in Victoria – 2005. Victorian Government Department of Sustainability & Environment, East Melbourne.

DEPI 2014. Sub-regional Species Strategy for the Southern Brown Bandicoot. Victorian Government Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Melbourne (January 2014)

DEWHA 2009a. Matters of National Environmental Significance. Significant impact guidelines 1.1. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage & the Arts, Canberra.

DEWHA 2009b. Significant impact guidelines for the vulnerable Growling Grass Frog (Litoria raniformis). Nationally threatened species and ecological communities EPBC Act policy statement 3.14, Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage & the Arts, Australian Government, Canberra.

DEWHA 2009c. Significant impact guidelines for 36 migratory shorebird species: Migratory species. Draft EPBC Act policy statement 3.21. Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage & the Arts, Canberra.

DEWHA 2010. Actions on, or impacting upon, Commonwealth land, and actions by Commonwealth agencies. Significant impact guidelines 1.2. Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Canberra.

DoE 2014. Glycine latrobeana in Species Profile and Threats Database, Department of the Environment, Canberra. Available from: http://www.environment.gov.au/sprat. Accessed Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:54:43 +1000.

DSE 2003. Flora and Fauna Guarantee Action Statement No. 74: New Holland Mouse Pseudomys novaehollandiae. The Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment, East Melbourne.

DSE (2004) Vegetation Quality Assessment Manual–Guidelines for applying the habitat hectares scoring method. Version 1.3. Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.

DSEWPaC 2010, Western Port Ramsar Wetland Ecological Character Description. Report for Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Canberra.

DSEWPaC 2012. Seasonal Herbaceous Wetlands (Freshwater) of the Temperate Lowland Plains, listing advice. Threatened Species Scientific Committee, Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Populations and Communities, Canberra.

DSEWPaC 2013a. Subtropical and Temperate Coastal Saltmarsh, listing advice. Threatened Species Scientific Committee, Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Populations and Communities, Canberra.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 45

DSEWPaC 2013b. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Environmental Offsets Policy. Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Populations and Communities, Canberra.

Duncan, M. 2010. National Recovery Plan for the Dense Leek Orchid Prasophyllum spicatum. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.

GHD 2013. Port of Hastings Development Authority, Port Container Expansion Project: Preliminary Ecological Assessment. Report to Port of Hastings Development Authority. Job No. 31/29838/06.

Jeanes J and Backhouse G. 2006. Wild Orchids of Victoria Australia. Aquatic Photographics, Australia.

Legg M. 2006. Flora and Fauna Survey and Management Prescriptions for Crib Point Stony Point Foreshore, Crib Point, October, 2005 to October, 2006. Report to Crib Point Stony Point Foreshore Committee of Management Inc. Author: Legg, M. Mal’s Environmental and Ecological Services.

Mungere J. 2008. Mornington Peninsula and Western Port Biosphere Reserve Foundation LTD Information Resource Database Updating Project. School of Geography and Environmental Science / Mornington Peninsula and Wester Port Biosphere Reserve Foundation Board, Melbourne.

Murphy AH and Downe J 2006. National Recovery Plan for the Purple Eyebright Euphrasia collina subspecies muelleri. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.

MPWPBRF (Mornington Peninsula & Western Port Biosphere Reserve Foundation Ltd). 2014. Western Port Biosphere. http://www.biosphere.org.au/index.html. Accessed 4th August 2014.

Seebeck J. and Menkhorst P. 2000. Status and conservation of the rodents of Victoria. Wildlife Research 27: 357–369.

Sinclair S, Tonkinson D, Downe J, Taranto M, Kefford E and White M. 2006. Remnant Native Vegetation on the Mornington Peninsula: Mapping and Condition Assessment. Final Report. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Heidelberg, Victoria.

Van Dyck and Strahan. 2008. The Mammals of Australia. Reed New Holland, Sydney.

Viridans 2015. Flora Information System. http://www.viridans.com/pagezero.html.

Yugovic J. 2011. Ecology of the Kooweerup Swamp and associated grasslands. Proceeding of The Royal Society of Victoria: 123(2): 172–188.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 46

Appendix A. Figures

CASEYCASEYCITYCITY

MORNINGTONMORNINGTONPENINSULAPENINSULA

SHIRESHIRE

GordonRolfe Bushland

Reserve

Olivers Creek

Kings

Creek

Mornington - Tyabb Rd

Jone

s Rd Park Lane

Tyab

b - T

oora

din

Rd

Barclay Cr

Frankston- Flinders

Rd

Eramosa Rd East

High St

Cem

eter

y Rd

Outlook Av

Bungower Rd

Station St

Gra

nt R

d

Bayview Rd

Queens Rd

Long Island Dr

Graydens Rd

Fran

ksto

n - F

linde

rs R

d

Salm

on S

tKing

St

Dan

deno

ng-H

astin

gsRd

Acknowledgement:VicMap Data Copyright © The State of Victoria, Department of Environment and Primary Industries 2014

Matter: 19075,Date: 25 February 2015,Checked by: KJK, SGM, Drawn by: SKM, Last edited by: jshepherdLocation:P:\19000s\19075\Mapping\19075_A1_Locality.mxd

Legend

Study Area

BluescopeSteel

Crown Land

Marine area not surveyed

Scale 1:45,000 @ A4, GDA 1994 MGA Zone 55

0 450 900 1,350 1,800

MetresBiosis Pty LtdBallarat, Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne,

Sydney, Wangaratta & Wollongong

Figure A1: Location of the Study Area - Hastings,Victoria

Melbourne

Werribee

Dandenong

Frankston

RingwoodLilydale

Pakenham

North Rd

Bembridge

Rd

Bung

ower

Rd

Tyabb - Tooradin Rd

HZ9

HZ1

6

HZ1

1

HZ1

6

HZ1

2HZ2

1

HZ1

6

HZ1

6

HZ1

6

HZ7

HZ7

HZ7

HZ1

1

HZ1

0H

Z16

010

020

030

040

050

0

Metres

Lege

nd Stud

y ar

ea

RAM

SAR

boun

dary

Scat

tere

d tr

ees

Ecol

ogic

al V

eget

atio

n Cl

ass

3 D

amp

Sand

s H

erb-

rich

Woo

dlan

d9

Coas

tal S

altm

arsh

48 H

eath

y W

oodl

and

53 S

wam

p Sc

rub

140

Man

grov

e Sh

rubl

and

175

Gra

ssy

Woo

dlan

d95

3 Es

tuar

ine

Scru

b

Mat

ter:

1907

5,

Dat

e: 2

7 Fe

brua

ry 2

015,

Ch

ecke

d by

: KJK

, Dra

wn

by: S

KM, L

ast e

dite

d by

: jsh

ephe

rdLo

catio

n:P:

\190

00s\

1907

5\M

appi

ng\

1907

5_A2

_EVC

s

Bios

is P

ty L

td

Balla

rat,

Bris

bane

, Can

berr

a, M

elbo

urne

, Sy

dney

, Wan

gara

tta &

Wol

long

ong

Tyab

b

Old

Tyab

b

Som

ervi

lle

Has

tings

a

c

b

e

d

Scal

e: 1

:10,

000

@ A

3

Figu

re A

2a: E

colo

gica

lFe

atur

es o

f the

stu

dy a

rea

Coor

dina

te S

yste

m: W

GS

1984

Web

Mer

cato

r Au

xilia

r

Ackn

owle

dgem

ents

: Im

ager

y: N

earM

ap 2

014,

Vic

Map

Dat

a Co

pyri

ght ©

The

Sta

te o

f Vic

tori

a, D

epar

tmen

t of E

nvir

onm

ent a

nd P

rimar

y In

dust

ries

201

4

Not

e: E

VCs

are

labe

lled

on m

ap w

ith

Hab

itat Z

one

ID ("

HZ#

")

Yarin

ga R

d

One

ills

Rd

Thor

nells

Rd

Katandra Rd

Pike

s Rd

Iluka

Rd

Whitneys Rd

Mckirdys Rd

Tyabb - T

ooradin Rd

Dandenong-HastingsRd

HZ4

HZ9 H

Z2

HZ1

6

HZ2

1

HZ1

7

HZ6

HZ1

2

HZ1

7

HZ8

HZ1

HZ2

HZ3

HZ1

9

HZ1

4

HZ1

4H

Z2

HZ3

HZ6

HZ5

HZ6

HZ5

HZ5

HZ8

HZ2

1H

Z21

HZ1

8H

Z16

HZ9

HZ1

7

HZ1

6

HZ1

6

HZ1

6

HZ1

7

HZ1

2

HZ1

9

HZ1

2

HZ1

4

HZ1

4H

Z14

HZ1

HZ1

4H

Z3

HZ2

0H

Z14

HZ1

4H

Z12

HZ2

2

HZ2

2

HZ3

17

17

17

22

22

010

020

030

040

050

0

Metres

Legend Stud

y ar

ea

RAM

SAR

boun

dary

EPB

C Ac

t Sea

sona

l Her

bace

ous

Wet

land

(Fre

shw

ater

) of t

he T

empe

rate

Lo

wla

nd P

lain

s / F

FG A

ct H

erb-

rich

Pl

ains

Gra

ssy

Wet

land

(Wes

t Gip

psla

nd)

Sign

ifica

nt F

lora

Spe

cies

Amph

ibro

mus

flui

tans

Ecol

ogic

al V

eget

atio

n Cl

ass

3 D

amp

Sand

s H

erb-

rich

Woo

dlan

d9

Coas

tal S

altm

arsh

10 E

stua

rine

Wet

land

48 H

eath

y W

oodl

and

53 S

wam

p Sc

rub

74 W

etla

nd F

orm

atio

n83

Sw

ampy

Rip

aria

n W

oodl

and

136

Sedg

e W

etla

nd14

0 M

angr

ove

Shru

blan

d17

5 G

rass

y W

oodl

and

653

Aqua

tic H

erbl

and

710

Dam

p H

eath

land

793

Dam

p H

eath

y W

oodl

and

937

Swam

py W

oodl

and

953

Estu

arin

e Sc

rub

Mat

ter:

1907

5,

Dat

e: 2

7 Fe

brua

ry 2

015,

Ch

ecke

d by

: KJK

, Dra

wn

by: S

KM, L

ast e

dite

d by

: jsh

ephe

rdLo

catio

n:P:

\190

00s\

1907

5\M

appi

ng\

1907

5_A2

_EVC

s

Bios

is P

ty L

td

Balla

rat,

Bris

bane

, Can

berr

a, M

elbo

urne

, Sy

dney

, Wan

gara

tta &

Wol

long

ong

Tyab

b

Old

Tyab

b

Som

ervi

lle

Has

tings

a

c

b

e

d

Scal

e: 1

:10,

000

@ A

3

Figu

re A

2b: E

colo

gica

lFe

atur

es o

f the

stu

dy a

rea

Coor

dina

te S

yste

m: W

GS

1984

Web

Mer

cato

r Au

xilia

r

Ackn

owle

dgem

ents

: Im

ager

y: N

earM

ap 2

014,

Vic

Map

Dat

a Co

pyri

ght ©

The

Sta

te o

f Vic

tori

a, D

epar

tmen

t of E

nvir

onm

ent a

nd P

rimar

y In

dust

ries

201

4

Not

e: E

VCs

are

labe

lled

on m

ap w

ith

Hab

itat Z

one

ID ("

HZ#

")

Old

Tyab

b

Robe

rtso

n St

Burke St

Bayv

iew

Rd

Callanan St

Kipp

es

Lane

Railway

Rd

Will

s St

Had

dock

St

Lyall St

Jeremiahs Rd

Marine Pde

Frankston - Flinders Rd

Morrah St

Stuart Rd

Kanowna St

Den

ham

Rd

Olivers

Creek

Oliv

ers

Cree

k

Marine Pde

Bayv

iew

Rd

Barc

lay

Cr

Frankston - Flinders Rd

Gra

yden

s Rd

Frankston - Flinders Rd

Danden

ong-Has

tings

Rd

Frankston - Flinders Rd

HZ1

2

HZ1

1

HZ1

1H

Z10

HZ1

0

HZ1

HZ1

HZ1

2

HZ1

2

HZ8

010

020

030

040

050

0

Metres

Lege

nd Stud

y ar

ea

RAM

SAR

boun

dary

Scat

tere

d tr

ees

Ecol

ogic

al V

eget

atio

n Cl

ass

3 D

amp

Sand

s H

erb-

rich

Woo

dlan

d48

Hea

thy

Woo

dlan

d53

Sw

amp

Scru

b17

5 G

rass

y W

oodl

and

937

Swam

py W

oodl

and

Mat

ter:

1907

5,

Dat

e: 2

7 Fe

brua

ry 2

015,

Ch

ecke

d by

: KJK

, Dra

wn

by: S

KM, L

ast e

dite

d by

: jsh

ephe

rdLo

catio

n:P:

\190

00s\

1907

5\M

appi

ng\

1907

5_A2

_EVC

s

Bios

is P

ty L

td

Balla

rat,

Bris

bane

, Can

berr

a, M

elbo

urne

, Sy

dney

, Wan

gara

tta &

Wol

long

ong

Tyab

b

Old

Tyab

b

Som

ervi

lle

Has

tings

a

c

b

e

d

Scal

e: 1

:10,

000

@ A

3

Figu

re A

2c: E

colo

gica

lFe

atur

es o

f the

stu

dy a

rea

Coor

dina

te S

yste

m: W

GS

1984

Web

Mer

cato

r Au

xilia

r

Ackn

owle

dgem

ents

: Im

ager

y: N

earM

ap 2

014,

Vic

Map

Dat

a Co

pyri

ght ©

The

Sta

te o

f Vic

tori

a, D

epar

tmen

t of E

nvir

onm

ent a

nd P

rimar

y In

dust

ries

201

4

Not

e: E

VCs

are

labe

lled

on m

ap w

ith

Hab

itat Z

one

ID ("

HZ#

")

Whi

tney

s Rd

Den

ham

Rd

Mckirdys Rd

HZ2

HZ2

HZ1

6

HZ2

1

HZ1

1

HZ1

2

HZ1

1

HZ2

HZ4

HZ4

HZ1

1

HZ1

2

HZ4

HZ2

1

HZ4

HZ2

HZ1

6

HZ9

HZ1

8HZ9

HZ1

0

HZ1

8

HZ1

7

HZ2

0

HZ1

3

HZ1

6

HZ9HZ1

8

HZ1

2

HZ1

3H

Z1

HZ2

1

HZ2

0

HZ1

HZ2

2H

Z15

HZ9

HZ2

1

HZ8

HZ1

7

HZ1

8H

Z16

HZ1

6

13

22

17

010

020

030

040

050

0

Metres

Legend Stud

y ar

ea

RAM

SAR

boun

dary

EPB

C Ac

t Sea

sona

l Her

bace

ous

Wet

land

(Fre

shw

ater

) of t

he T

empe

rate

Lo

wla

nd P

lain

s / F

FG A

ct H

erb-

rich

Pl

ains

Gra

ssy

Wet

land

(Wes

t Gip

psla

nd)

Sign

ifica

nt F

lora

Spe

cies

Amph

ibro

mus

flui

tans

Scat

tere

d tr

ees

Ecol

ogic

al V

eget

atio

n Cl

ass

3 D

amp

Sand

s H

erb-

rich

Woo

dlan

d9

Coas

tal S

altm

arsh

10 E

stua

rine

Wet

land

48 H

eath

y W

oodl

and

53 S

wam

p Sc

rub

74 W

etla

nd F

orm

atio

n12

5 Pl

ains

Gra

ssy

Wet

land

136

Sedg

e W

etla

nd14

0 M

angr

ove

Shru

blan

d17

5 G

rass

y W

oodl

and

653

Aqua

tic H

erbl

and

793

Dam

p H

eath

y W

oodl

and

937

Swam

py W

oodl

and

953

Estu

arin

e Sc

rub

Mat

ter:

1907

5,

Dat

e: 2

7 Fe

brua

ry 2

015,

Ch

ecke

d by

: KJK

, Dra

wn

by: S

KM, L

ast e

dite

d by

: jsh

ephe

rdLo

catio

n:P:

\190

00s\

1907

5\M

appi

ng\

1907

5_A2

_EVC

s

Bios

is P

ty L

td

Balla

rat,

Bris

bane

, Can

berr

a, M

elbo

urne

, Sy

dney

, Wan

gara

tta &

Wol

long

ong

Tyab

b

Old

Tyab

b

Som

ervi

lle

Has

tings

a

c

b

e

d

Scal

e: 1

:10,

000

@ A

3

Figu

re A

2d: E

colo

gica

lFe

atur

es o

f the

stu

dy a

rea

Coor

dina

te S

yste

m: W

GS

1984

Web

Mer

cato

r Au

xilia

r

Ackn

owle

dgem

ents

: Im

ager

y: N

earM

ap 2

014,

Vic

Map

Dat

a Co

pyri

ght ©

The

Sta

te o

f Vic

tori

a, D

epar

tmen

t of E

nvir

onm

ent a

nd P

rimar

y In

dust

ries

201

4

Not

e: E

VCs

are

labe

lled

on m

ap w

ith

Hab

itat Z

one

ID ("

HZ#

")

War

ram

unga

Dr

Stuart Ct

Barbecue Ct

Qui

ckm

atch

St

Arun

ta A

v

Vendetta St

Cemetery Rd

Voyager St

Picnic Av

Jeremiahs Rd

Hig

hlan

d Av

Foreshore Av

Out

look

Av

Beac

h D

r

Cemetery Rd

Bayv

iew

Rd

Out

look

Av

Cemetery Rd

Long Island Dr

HZ1

HZ9

HZ1

0

HZ2

1H

Z18

HZ2

1

HZ1

6

HZ2

1H

Z16

HZ1

6

HZ2

1

HZ1

2H

Z16

HZ1

6H

Z9

HZ1

6

HZ1

0

HZ2

1

HZ2

1

HZ2

1

HZ2

1

HZ1

HZ1

0H

Z10

HZ1

5H

Z10

HZ1

0

HZ1

0

HZ1

0

HZ1

0

HZ1

0

010

020

030

040

050

0

Metres

Lege

nd Stud

y ar

ea

RAM

SAR

boun

dary

Sign

ifica

nt F

lora

Spe

cies

Lim

oniu

m a

ustr

ale

Ecol

ogic

al V

eget

atio

n Cl

ass

3 D

amp

Sand

s H

erb-

rich

Woo

dlan

d9

Coas

tal S

altm

arsh

10 E

stua

rine

Wet

land

53 S

wam

p Sc

rub

140

Man

grov

e Sh

rubl

and

175

Gra

ssy

Woo

dlan

d93

7 Sw

ampy

Woo

dlan

d95

3 Es

tuar

ine

Scru

b

Mat

ter:

1907

5,

Dat

e: 2

7 Fe

brua

ry 2

015,

Ch

ecke

d by

: KJK

, Dra

wn

by: S

KM, L

ast e

dite

d by

: jsh

ephe

rdLo

catio

n:P:

\190

00s\

1907

5\M

appi

ng\

1907

5_A2

_EVC

s

Bios

is P

ty L

td

Balla

rat,

Bris

bane

, Can

berr

a, M

elbo

urne

, Sy

dney

, Wan

gara

tta &

Wol

long

ong

Tyab

b

Old

Tyab

b

Som

ervi

lle

Has

tings

a

c

b

e

d

Scal

e: 1

:10,

000

@ A

3

Figu

re A

2e: E

colo

gica

lFe

atur

es o

f the

stu

dy a

rea

Coor

dina

te S

yste

m: W

GS

1984

Web

Mer

cato

r Au

xilia

r

Ackn

owle

dgem

ents

: Im

ager

y: N

earM

ap 2

014,

Vic

Map

Dat

a Co

pyri

ght ©

The

Sta

te o

f Vic

tori

a, D

epar

tmen

t of E

nvir

onm

ent a

nd P

rimar

y In

dust

ries

201

4

Not

e: E

VCs

are

labe

lled

on m

ap w

ith

Hab

itat Z

one

ID ("

HZ#

")

Old

Tyab

b

Tyab

b

Whi

tney

s Rd

Bayv

iew

Rd

Callanan St

Iluka

Rd

Kipp

es

Lane

Bett

ina

St Railway Rd

Dal

ton

Dr

Lim

a Av

Tiga

Ct

Had

dock

St

Elle

Way

Jeremiahs Rd

Lyall St

Crai

g AvDe

nnis

St

Marine Pde

Har

rison

Ct

Kath

leen

Cr

Morrah St

William St

The Crescent

Dele

pan

Dr

Pine

Gr

Pike

s Rd

KanownaSt

Mckirdys Rd

Thor

nells

Rd

Den

ham

Rd

One

ills

Rd

Cent

ralA

v

Orc

hard

Gr

Olivers Creek

Marine Pde

Bayv

iew

Rd

Mor

ning

ton

- Tya

bb R

d

Fran

ksto

n - F

linde

rs R

d

Barc

lay

Cr

Frankston-FlindersRd

Dandenong -

Hasti

ngs Rd

1512

13

14

1917

18

16

1120

41

25

3

6

108

97

015

030

045

060

075

0

Metres

Lege

nd Faun

a ca

mer

a lo

catio

nSt

udy

area

Mat

ter:

1907

5/19

076,

D

ate:

25

Febr

uary

201

5,

Chec

ked

by: I

S, D

raw

n by

: SKM

, Las

t edi

ted

by: j

shep

herd

Loca

tion:

P:\1

9000

s\19

075\

Map

ping

\19

075_

A3a_

Cam

era_

loca

tionsBios

is P

ty L

td

Balla

rat,

Bris

bane

, Can

berr

a, M

elbo

urne

, Sy

dney

, Wan

gara

tta &

Wol

long

ong

Tyab

b

Old

Tyab

b

Som

ervi

lle

Has

tings

Scal

e: 1

:15,

000

@ A

3

Figu

re A

3a: F

auna

Sur

vey

Loca

tions

, cam

eras

Coor

dina

te S

yste

m: G

DA

1994

MG

A Zo

ne 5

5

Ackn

owle

dgem

ents

: Vic

Map

Dat

a Co

pyri

ght ©

The

Sta

te o

f Vic

toria

, Dep

artm

ent o

f Env

ironm

ent a

nd P

rimar

y In

dust

ries

201

4

!

!

Old

Tyab

b

Tyab

b

Whi

tney

s Rd

Bayv

iew

Rd

Callanan St

Iluka

Rd

Kipp

es

Lane

Bett

ina

St Railway Rd

Dal

ton

Dr

Lim

a Av

Tiga

Ct

Had

dock

St

Elle

Way

Jeremiahs Rd

Lyall St

Crai

g AvDe

nnis

St

Marine Pde

Har

rison

Ct

Kath

leen

Cr

Morrah St

William St

The Crescent

Dele

pan

Dr

Pine

Gr

Pike

s Rd

KanownaSt

Mckirdys Rd

Thor

nells

Rd

Den

ham

Rd

One

ills

Rd

Cent

ralA

v

Orc

hard

Gr

Olivers Creek

Marine Pde

Bayv

iew

Rd

Fran

ksto

n - F

linde

rs R

d

Barc

lay

Cr

Frankston-FlindersRd

Dandenong - Hasti

ngs R

d

015

030

045

060

075

0

Metres

Lege

ndSt

udy

area

Ellio

t Tr

aplin

esTa

rget

ani

mal

sm

amm

als

skin

ksG

row

ling

Gra

ss F

rog

surv

eySu

itabl

e ha

bita

t, su

rvey

edU

nsui

tabl

e ha

bita

t, no

t sur

veye

d ±M

atte

r: 19

075/

1907

6,

Date

: 30

Janu

ary

2015

, Ch

ecke

d by

: IS,

Dra

wn

by: S

KM, L

ast e

dite

d by

: lm

ilne

Loca

tion:

P:\1

9000

s\19

075\

Map

ping

\19

075_

A3b_

Trap

lines

&G

GF

Bios

is P

ty L

td

Balla

rat,

Bris

bane

, Can

berr

a, M

elbo

urne

, Sy

dney

, Wan

gara

tta &

Wol

long

ong

! !

!

!Tyab

b

Old

Tyab

b

Som

ervi

lle Hast

ings

Scal

e: 1

:15,

000

@ A

3

Figu

re A

3b: F

auna

Sur

vey

Loca

tion

s, G

row

ling

Gra

ssFr

og s

urve

y an

d El

liot

trap

loca

tion

s

Coor

dina

te S

yste

m: G

DA 1

994

MG

A Zo

ne 5

5

Ackn

owle

dgem

ents

: Vic

Map

Dat

a Co

pyri

ght ©

The

Sta

te o

f Vic

tori

a, D

epar

tmen

t of E

nvir

onm

ent a

nd P

rim

ary

Indu

stri

es 2

014

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 50

Appendix B. Flora

Notes to tables:

EPBC Act: CR - Critically Endangered EN - Endangered VU – Vulnerable PMST – Protected Matters Search Tool

State Advisory List: e - endangered v - vulnerable r - rare k - poorly known

FFG Act: L - listed as threatened under FFG Act P - protected under the FFG Act (public land only)

Noxious weed status: SP - State prohibited species RP - Regionally prohibited species RC - Regionally controlled species RR - Regionally restricted species

# - Native species outside natural range

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 51

B.1 Flora species recorded in the study area during the current survey Table B.1. Flora species recorded from the study area

Status Scientific Name Common Name Indigenous Species Acacia mearnsii Black Wattle Acacia melanoxylon Blackwood Acacia oxycedrus Spike Wattle Acacia paradoxa Hedge Wattle Acacia pycnantha Golden Wattle Acacia suaveolens Sweet Wattle Acacia verticillata Prickly Moses Acaena agnipila Hairy Sheep's Burr Acaena echinata Sheep's Burr Acaena novae-zelandiae Bidgee-widgee Acianthus caudatus Mayfly Orchid Acianthus pusillus Small Mosquito-orchid Acrotriche serrulata Honey-pots Alisma plantago-aquatica Water Plantain Allittia cardiocarpa Swamp Daisy Allocasuarina littoralis Black Sheoak Allocasuarina paludosa Scrub Sheoak Allocasuarina paradoxa Green Sheoak Amperea xiphoclada var. xiphoclada Broom Spurge Amphibromus archeri Pointed Swamp Wallaby-grass

VU Amphibromus fluitans River Swamp Wallaby-grass Amphibromus nervosus Common Swamp Wallaby-grass Amyema pendula Drooping Mistletoe Angianthus preissianus Salt Angianthus Anthosachne scabra s.s. Common Wheat-grass Aotus ericoides Common Aotus Aphelia gracilis Slender Aphelia Apium prostratum subsp. prostratum Sea Celery Apodasmia brownii Coarse Twine-rush Arthropodium strictum s.s. Chocolate Lily Asperula conferta Common Woodruff Astroloma humifusum Cranberry Heath Atriplex cinerea Coast Saltbush

r Atriplex paludosa subsp. paludosa Marsh Saltbush Austrostipa mollis Supple Spear-grass Austrostipa pubinodis Tall Spear-grass

r Austrostipa rudis subsp. australis Veined Spear-grass Austrostipa rudis subsp. rudis Veined Spear-grass Austrostipa semibarbata Fibrous Spear-grass

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 52

Status Scientific Name Common Name Austrostipa stipoides Prickly Spear-grass

r Avicennia marina subsp. australasica Grey Mangrove Azolla filiculoides Pacific Azolla Banksia integrifolia subsp. integrifolia Coast Banksia Banksia marginata Silver Banksia Baumea acuta Pale Twig-sedge Baumea arthrophylla Fine Twig-sedge Baumea gunnii Slender Twig-sedge Baumea juncea Bare Twig-sedge Baumea rubiginosa s.s. Soft Twig-sedge Baumea tetragona Square Twig-sedge Billardiera mutabilis Common Apple-berry Blechnum cartilagineum Gristle Fern Blechnum nudum Fishbone Water-fern Bossiaea cinerea Showy Bossiaea Bossiaea prostrata Creeping Bossiaea Brunonia australis Blue Pincushion Burchardia umbellata Milkmaids Bursaria spinosa Sweet Bursaria Caesia calliantha Blue Grass-lily Caesia parviflora Pale Grass-lily Caladenia carnea s.s. Pink Fingers Caladenia pusilla Tiny Pink-fingers Caladenia transitoria Eastern Bronzehood Orchid Callistemon spp. Bottlebrush Calochilus robertsonii s.s. Western Beard-orchid

k Cardamine tenuifolia Slender Bitter-cress Carex appressa Tall Sedge Carex breviculmis Common Grass-sedge Carex inversa Knob Sedge Cassinia aculeata Common Cassinia Cassinia arcuata Drooping Cassinia Cassinia trinerva Three-nerved Cassinia Cassytha glabella f. dispar Slender Dodder-laurel Cassytha melantha Coarse Dodder-laurel Cassytha pubescens s.s. Downy Dodder-laurel Centella cordifolia Centella Centipeda elatinoides Elatine Sneezeweed Centrolepis aristata Pointed Centrolepis Centrolepis fascicularis Tufted Centrolepis Centrolepis strigosa subsp. strigosa Hairy Centrolepis Chamaescilla corymbosa var. corymbosa Blue Stars Chiloglottis valida Common Bird-orchid

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 53

Status Scientific Name Common Name k Clematis decipiens Slender Clematis

Clematis microphylla s.s. Small-leaved Clematis Comesperma volubile Love Creeper Coprosma quadrifida Prickly Currant-bush Coronidium scorpioides s.s. Button Everlasting Correa reflexa Common Correa Corybas spp. Helmet Orchid Cotula australis Common Cotula Craspedia paludicola Swamp Billy-buttons Crassula decumbens var. decumbens Spreading Crassula Crassula sieberiana s.l. Sieber Crassula Cryptostylis subulata Large Tongue-orchid Deyeuxia quadriseta Reed Bent-grass Dianella admixta Black-anther Flax-lily Dianella brevicaulis Small-flower Flax-lily

v Dianella sp. aff. longifolia (Benambra) Arching Flax-lily Dichondra repens Kidney-weed Dillwynia cinerascens s.s. Grey Parrot-pea Dillwynia glaberrima Smooth Parrot-pea Dillwynia sericea Showy Parrot-pea Disphyma crassifolium subsp. clavellatum Rounded Noon-flower Distichlis distichophylla Australian Salt-grass Diuris sulphurea Tiger Orchid Drosera aberrans Scented Sundew Drosera peltata s.l. Pale Sundew Drosera pygmaea Tiny Sundew Dysphania spp. Pigweed Eleocharis acuta Common Spike-sedge Eleocharis pusilla Small Spike-sedge Eleocharis sphacelata Tall Spike-sedge Empodisma minus Spreading Rope-rush

k Entolasia stricta Upright Panic Epacris impressa Common Heath Epilobium billardierianum Variable Willow-herb Epilobium hirtigerum Hairy Willow-herb Eragrostis brownii Common Love-grass Eryngium vesiculosum Prickfoot Eucalyptus ovata var. ovata Swamp Gum Eucalyptus radiata subsp. radiata Narrow-leaf Peppermint Eucalyptus viminalis subsp. pryoriana Coast Manna-gum Eucalyptus viminalis subsp. viminalis Manna Gum Euchiton involucratus s.l. Common Cudweed Euchiton japonicus s.s. Creeping Cudweed

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 54

Status Scientific Name Common Name Euchiton sphaericus Annual Cudweed Exocarpos cupressiformis Cherry Ballart Exocarpos strictus Pale-fruit Ballart Ficinia nodosa Knobby Club-sedge Gahnia filum Chaffy Saw-sedge Gahnia radula Thatch Saw-sedge Gahnia trifida Coast Saw-sedge Galium binifolium Reflexed Bedstraw Geranium retrorsum s.s. Grassland Crane's-bill Geranium sp. 2 Variable Crane's-bill Geranium sp. 5 Naked Crane's-bill Geranium spp. Crane's Bill Glossodia major Wax-lip Orchid Glyceria australis Australian Sweet-grass Glycine clandestina Twining Glycine Gonocarpus humilis Shade Raspwort Gonocarpus micranthus Creeping Raspwort Gonocarpus tetragynus Common Raspwort Goodenia geniculata Bent Goodenia Goodenia gracilis Slender Goodenia Goodenia humilis Swamp Goodenia Goodenia lanata Trailing Goodenia Goodenia ovata Hop Goodenia Gratiola peruviana Austral Brooklime Hakea nodosa Yellow Hakea Hakea ulicina Furze Hakea Haloragis heterophylla Varied Raspwort Helichrysum luteoalbum Jersey Cudweed Hemarthria uncinata var. uncinata Mat Grass Hemichroa pentandra Trailing Hemichroa Hibbertia acicularis Prickly Guinea-flower Hibbertia fasciculata var. prostrata Bundled Guinea-flower Hibbertia riparia Erect Guinea-flower Hydrocotyle callicarpa Small Pennywort Hydrocotyle hirta Hairy Pennywort Hypericum gramineum spp. agg. Small St John's Wort Hypolaena fastigiata Tassel Rope-rush Hypoxis hygrometrica var. hygrometrica Golden Weather-glass Hypoxis hygrometrica var. villosisepala Golden Weather-glass Hypoxis vaginata Yellow Star Isolepis cernua var. cernua Nodding Club-sedge Isolepis cernua var. platycarpa Broad-fruit Club-sedge Isolepis fluitans Floating Club-sedge

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 55

Status Scientific Name Common Name Isolepis hookeriana Grassy Club-sedge Isolepis inundata Swamp Club-sedge Isopogon ceratophyllus Horny Cone-bush Juncus amabilis Hollow Rush Juncus bufonius Toad Rush Juncus gregiflorus Green Rush Juncus holoschoenus Joint-leaf Rush Juncus kraussii subsp. australiensis Sea Rush Juncus pallidus Pale Rush Juncus planifolius Broad-leaf Rush

Juncus prismatocarpus subsp. prismatocarpus Branching Rush

Juncus procerus Tall Rush r Juncus revolutus Creeping Rush Juncus sarophorus Broom Rush Juncus subsecundus Finger Rush Kennedia prostrata Running Postman Kunzea ericoides spp. agg. Burgan Lachnagrostis aemula s.s. Leafy Blown-grass Lachnagrostis billardierei subsp. billardierei Coast Blown-grass Lachnagrostis filiformis s.s. Common Blown-grass

r Lachnagrostis robusta Salt Blown-grass Lagenophora gracilis Slender Bottle-daisy Lagenophora stipitata Common Bottle-daisy Lepidosperma concavum Sandhill Sword-sedge Lepidosperma filiforme Common Rapier-sedge Lepidosperma gunnii Slender Sword-sedge Lepidosperma laterale var. laterale Variable Sword-sedge Lepidosperma laterale var. majus Variable Sword-sedge Lepidosperma longitudinale Pithy Sword-sedge Lepilaena preissii Slender Water-mat Leptoceras menziesii Hare Orchid Leptorhynchos squamatus Scaly Buttons Leptorhynchos tenuifolius Wiry Buttons Leptospermum continentale Prickly Tea-tree Leptospermum lanigerum Woolly Tea-tree Leptospermum myrsinoides Heath Tea-tree Leptospermum scoparium Manuka Lepyrodia muelleri Common Scale-rush Leucopogon australis Spike Beard-heath Leucopogon ericoides Pink Beard-heath Leucopogon parviflorus Coast Beard-heath Leucopogon virgatus var. virgatus Common Beard-heath

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 56

Status Scientific Name Common Name r Limonium australe Yellow Sea-lavender Lindsaea linearis Screw Fern Lobelia anceps Angled Lobelia Lomandra filiformis Wattle Mat-rush Lomandra longifolia Spiny-headed Mat-rush Lomandra nana Dwarf Mat-rush Lotus spp. Trefoil Luzula meridionalis Common Woodrush Luzula spp. Woodrush Lythrum hyssopifolia Small Loosestrife Mazus pumilio Swamp Mazus Melaleuca squarrosa Scented Paperbark Microlaena stipoides var. stipoides Weeping Grass Microtis parviflora Slender Onion-orchid Microtis unifolia Common Onion-orchid Monotoca scoparia Prickly Broom-heath Montia australasica White Purslane Muellerina eucalyptoides Creeping Mistletoe Myriophyllum crispatum Upright Water-milfoil Myriophyllum simulans Amphibious Water-milfoil Olearia lirata Snowy Daisy-bush Olearia phlogopappa Dusty Daisy-bush Olearia ramulosa Twiggy Daisy-bush Opercularia ovata Broad-leaf Stinkweed Opercularia varia Variable Stinkweed Orthoceras strictum Horned Orchid Oxalis perennans Grassland Wood-sorrel Ozothamnus ferrugineus Tree Everlasting Pandorea pandorana subsp. pandorana Wonga Vine Parietaria debilis s.s. Shade Pellitory Patersonia fragilis Short Purple-flag Patersonia occidentalis var. occidentalis Long Purple-flag Pelargonium rodneyanum Magenta Stork's-bill Persicaria decipiens Slender Knotweed Persoonia juniperina Prickly Geebung Phragmites australis Common Reed Pimelea glauca Smooth Rice-flower Pimelea humilis Common Rice-flower Pimelea octophylla Woolly Rice-flower Plantago gaudichaudii Narrow Plantain Platylobium formosum spp. agg. Handsome Flat-pea Platylobium obtusangulum Common Flat-pea Poa clelandii Noah's Ark

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 57

Status Scientific Name Common Name Poa labillardierei Common Tussock-grass Poa morrisii Soft Tussock-grass Poa poiformis Coast Tussock-grass Poa sieberiana var. sieberiana Grey Tussock-grass Podolobium spp. Podolobium Poranthera microphylla s.s. Small Poranthera

k Potamogeton perfoliatus Perfoliate Pondweed Potamogeton tricarinatus s.l. Floating Pondweed Pteridium esculentum Austral Bracken Pterostylis concinna Trim Greenhood Pterostylis melagramma Tall Greenhood Pterostylis nana Dwarf Greenhood Pterostylis nutans Nodding Greenhood Pterostylis parviflora s.s. Tiny Greenhood Pterostylis pedunculata Maroonhood Pterostylis spp. Greenhood Ptychomnion aciculare Paper Moss Puccinellia stricta s.s. Australian Saltmarsh-grass Pultenaea daphnoides Large-leaf Bush-pea Pultenaea gunnii Golden Bush-pea Ranunculus amphitrichus Small River Buttercup Ranunculus inundatus River Buttercup Ranunculus lappaceus Australian Buttercup Ranunculus spp. Buttercup Rhagodia candolleana subsp. candolleana Seaberry Saltbush Ricinocarpos pinifolius Wedding Bush Ruppia megacarpa Large-fruit Tassel Ruppia spp. Tassel Rytidosperma caespitosum Common Wallaby-grass Rytidosperma fulvum Copper-awned Wallaby-grass Rytidosperma geniculatum Kneed Wallaby-grass Rytidosperma laeve Smooth Wallaby-grass Rytidosperma penicillatum Weeping Wallaby-grass Rytidosperma racemosum var. racemosum Slender Wallaby-grass Rytidosperma semiannulare Wetland Wallaby-grass Rytidosperma setaceum var. setaceum Bristly Wallaby-grass Samolus repens var. repens Creeping Brookweed Sarcocornia blackiana Thick-head Glasswort Sarcocornia quinqueflora Beaded Glasswort Schoenus apogon Common Bog-sedge Schoenus brevifolius Zig-zag Bog-sedge Schoenus lepidosperma Slender Bog-sedge Schoenus nitens Shiny Bog-sedge

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 58

Status Scientific Name Common Name Schoenus tesquorum Soft Bog-sedge Selaginella uliginosa Swamp Selaginella Selliera radicans Shiny Swamp-mat Senecio bathurstianus Dissected Fireweed Senecio glomeratus subsp. glomeratus Annual Fireweed Senecio hispidulus Rough Fireweed Senecio minimus Shrubby Fireweed Senecio odoratus Scented Groundsel Senecio pinnatifolius var. lanceolatus Lance-leaf Groundsel Senecio quadridentatus Cotton Fireweed Senecio tenuiflorus spp. agg. Slender Fireweed Solanum laciniatum Large Kangaroo Apple Spergularia sp. 1 Native Sea-spurrey Spergularia spp. Sand Spurrey Spinifex sericeus Hairy Spinifex Stackhousia viminea Slender Stackhousia Stylidium graminifolium s.s. Grass Triggerplant Suaeda australis Austral Seablite Tecticornia arbuscula Shrubby Glasswort Tecticornia arbuscula Shrubby Glasswort Tetragonia implexicoma Bower Spinach Tetratheca ciliata Pink-bells Tetratheca pilosa Hairy Pink-bells Thelionema caespitosum Tufted Lily Thelymitra brevifolia Peppertop Sun-orchid Thelymitra carnea Pink Sun-orchid Thelymitra flexuosa Twisted Sun-orchid Thelymitra holmesii s.s. Blue-star Sun-orchid Thelymitra ixioides s.s. Spotted Sun-orchid Thelymitra juncifolia Rush-leaf Sun-orchid Thelymitra media s.s. Tall Sun-orchid Thelymitra nuda Plain Sun-orchid

e Thelymitra pallidiflora Pallid Sun-orchid Thelymitra pauciflora s.s. Slender Sun-orchid Thelymitra peniculata Trim Sun-orchid Thelymitra rubra Salmon Sun-orchid Themeda triandra Kangaroo Grass Thysanotus patersonii Twining Fringe-lily Thysanotus tuberosus Common Fringe-lily Trachymene composita Parsnip Trachymene Tricoryne elatior Yellow Rush-lily Triglochin procera s.s. Common Water-ribbons Triglochin striata Streaked Arrowgrass

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 59

Status Scientific Name Common Name Typha domingensis Narrow-leaf Cumbungi Utricularia dichotoma s.s. Fairies' Aprons Veronica gracilis Slender Speedwell Villarsia exaltata Erect Marsh-flower Villarsia reniformis Running Marsh-flower Viminaria juncea Golden Spray Viola cleistogamoides Hidden Violet Viola hederacea sensu Entwisle (1996) Ivy-leaf Violet Wahlenbergia gracilis Sprawling Bluebell Wahlenbergia stricta subsp. stricta Tall Bluebell Xanthorrhoea minor subsp. lutea Small Grass-tree Xanthosia dissecta s.s. Native Parsley Xanthosia huegelii Heath Xanthosia Introduced Species Acacia baileyana Cootamundra Wattle

# Acacia longifolia subsp. longifolia Sallow Wattle # Acacia longifolia subsp. sophorae Coast Wattle Acacia saligna Golden Wreath Wattle Acetosella vulgaris Sheep Sorrel Agrostis capillaris var. capillaris Brown-top Bent Agrostis stolonifera Creeping Bent Aira caryophyllea subsp. caryophyllea Silvery Hair-grass Aira cupaniana Quicksilver Grass Aira elegantissima Delicate Hair-grass Aira praecox Early Hair-grass Aira spp. Hair Grass

RR Allium triquetrum Angled Onion Anthoxanthum odoratum Sweet Vernal-grass Arctotheca calendula Cape Weed Arrhenatherum elatius var. bulbosum False Oat-grass

RR Asparagus asparagoides Bridal Creeper Asparagus scandens Asparagus Fern Aster subulatus Aster-weed Atriplex prostrata Hastate Orache Avena barbata Bearded Oat Billardiera heterophylla Bluebell Creeper Brassica fruticulosa Twiggy Turnip Brassica rapa White Turnip Briza maxima Large Quaking-grass Briza minor Lesser Quaking-grass Bromus catharticus Prairie Grass Bromus diandrus Great Brome Bromus hordeaceus subsp. hordeaceus Soft Brome

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 60

Status Scientific Name Common Name Cakile maritima subsp. maritima Sea Rocket

RP Calicotome spinosa Spiny Broom Callitriche stagnalis Common Water-starwort

RC Carduus pycnocephalus Slender Thistle Catapodium rigidum Fern Grass Cenchrus clandestinus Kikuyu Cenchrus clandestinus Kikuyu Centaurium erythraea Common Centaury Centaurium tenuiflorum Slender Centaury Cerastium glomeratum s.s. Sticky Mouse-ear Chickweed

RC Chrysanthemoides monilifera Boneseed Cicendia quadrangularis Square Cicendia

RC Cirsium vulgare Spear Thistle Conyza bonariensis Flaxleaf Fleabane Cortaderia selloana Pampas Grass

v, # Corymbia maculata Spotted Gum Cotoneaster pannosus Velvet Cotoneaster Cotula coronopifolia Water Buttons Crassula natans var. minus Water Crassula

RC Crataegus monogyna Hawthorn Cupressus macrocarpa Monterey Cypress

RC Cynara cardunculus subsp. flavescens Artichoke Thistle Cynodon dactylon var. dactylon Couch Cyperus eragrostis Drain Flat-sedge Dactylis glomerata Cocksfoot Danthonia decumbens Heath Grass Daucus carota Carrot

RC Dittrichia graveolens Stinkwort Ehrharta erecta var. erecta Panic Veldt-grass Ehrharta longiflora Annual Veldt-grass Erica lusitanica Spanish Heath # Eucalyptus globulus Southern Blue-gum Festuca arundinacea Tall Fescue Festuca rubra s.s. Creeping Fescue

RR Foeniculum vulgare Fennel Fraxinus angustifolia Desert Ash Fumaria bastardii Bastard's Fumitory Galium aparine Cleavers Galium murale Small Goosegrass Gamochaeta purpurea s.s. Spiked Cudweed Gaudinia fragilis Fragile Oat

RC Genista linifolia Flax-leaf Broom RC Genista monspessulana Montpellier Broom

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 61

Status Scientific Name Common Name Geranium dissectum Cut-leaf Crane's-bill Geranium molle Dove's Foot Gladiolus tristis Evening-flower Gladiolus Glyceria declinata Manna Grass Hakea drupacea Sweet Hakea Hedera helix English Ivy Helminthotheca echioides Ox-tongue Holcus lanatus Yorkshire Fog Hordeum leporinum Barley-grass

RC Hypericum perforatum subsp. veronense St John's Wort Hypochaeris glabra Smooth Cat's-ear Hypochaeris radicata Flatweed # Imperata cylindrica Blady Grass Isolepis hystrix Awned Club-sedge Isolepis levynsiana Tiny Flat-sedge

RC Jacobaea vulgaris Ragwort RC Juncus acutus subsp. acutus Spiny Rush Juncus articulatus subsp. articulatus Jointed Rush Juncus capitatus Capitate Rush Juncus microcephalus Tiny-headed Rush Lactuca serriola Prickly Lettuce

Leontodon taraxacoides subsp. taraxacoides Hairy Hawkbit

Lepidium africanum Common Peppercress # Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree Linaria pelisseriana Pelisser's Toad-flax Linum trigynum French Flax Lolium perenne Perennial Rye-grass Lolium rigidum Wimmera Rye-grass Lonicera japonica Japanese Honeysuckle Lophopyrum ponticum Tall Wheat-grass Lotus corniculatus Bird's-foot Trefoil Lotus subbiflorus Hairy Bird's-foot Trefoil Lysimachia arvensis Pimpernel Lysimachia arvensis (Blue-flowered variant) Blue Pimpernel Lysimachia arvensis (Red-flowered variant) Scarlet Pimpernel Lythrum junceum Mediterranean Loosestrife Malus pumila Apple Malva parviflora Small-flower Mallow Medicago polymorpha Burr Medic Medicago sativa subsp. sativa Lucerne

r, # Melaleuca armillaris subsp. armillaris Giant Honey-myrtle # Melaleuca ericifolia Swamp Paperbark

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 62

Status Scientific Name Common Name Melilotus indicus Sweet Melilot Modiola caroliniana Red-flower Mallow # Myoporum insulare Common Boobialla Nasturtium officinale Watercress Olea europaea Olive Ornithopus pinnatus Sand Bird's-foot

RR Oxalis pes-caprae Soursob Oxalis purpurea Large-flower Wood-sorrel Papaver somniferum Opium Poppy Parapholis incurva Coast Barb-grass Paraserianthes lophantha subsp. lophantha Cape Wattle Parentucellia viscosa Yellow Bartsia Paspalum dilatatum Paspalum Paspalum distichum Water Couch Petrorhagia dubia Velvety Pink Phalaris aquatica Toowoomba Canary-grass Phoenix canariensis Canary Island Date-palm Phytolacca octandra Red-ink Weed Pinus radiata Radiata Pine # Pittosporum undulatum Sweet Pittosporum Plantago coronopus Buck's-horn Plantain Plantago lanceolata Ribwort Poa annua Annual Meadow-grass Poa trivialis subsp. trivialis Rough Meadow-grass Polycarpon tetraphyllum Four-leaved Allseed Polygala myrtifolia Myrtle-leaf Milkwort Polygonum aviculare s.s. Hogweed Polypogon monspeliensis Annual Beard-grass Prunella vulgaris Self-heal Prunus cerasifera Cherry Plum Ranunculus muricatus Sharp Buttercup Ranunculus repens Creeping Buttercup Romulea rosea Onion Grass

RC Rosa rubiginosa Sweet Briar RC Rubus fruticosus spp. agg. Blackberry Rumex conglomeratus Clustered Dock Rumex crispus Curled Dock

RC Senecio pterophorus African Daisy Setaria parviflora Slender Pigeon Grass Setaria pumila subsp. pumila Pale Pigeon-grass Silene gallica French Catchfly Sisyrinchium iridifolium Striped Rush-leaf Solanum nigrum s.s. Black Nightshade

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 63

Status Scientific Name Common Name Soliva sessilis Jo Jo Sonchus asper s.s. Rough Sow-thistle Sonchus oleraceus Common Sow-thistle Sporobolus africanus Rat-tail Grass Stellaria media Chickweed Stenotaphrum secundatum Buffalo Grass Taraxacum officinale spp. agg. Garden Dandelion Tradescantia fluminensis Wandering Jew Tragopogon porrifolius subsp. porrifolius Salsify Trifolium angustifolium var. angustifolium Narrow-leaf Clover Trifolium arvense var. arvense Hare's-foot Clover Trifolium campestre var. campestre Hop Clover Trifolium dubium Suckling Clover Trifolium glomeratum Cluster Clover Trifolium repens var. repens White Clover Trifolium striatum Knotted Clover Trifolium subterraneum Subterranean Clover

RC Ulex europaeus Gorse Ulmus spp. Elm Vellereophyton dealbatum White Cudweed Verbena bonariensis var. bonariensis s.s. Purple-top Verbena Vicia hirsuta Tiny Vetch Vicia sativa Common Vetch Vicia tetrasperma Slender Vetch Vulpia bromoides Squirrel-tail Fescue Vulpia muralis Wall Fescue Vulpia myuros f. myuros Rat's-tail Fescue

RC Watsonia meriana var. bulbillifera Bulbil Watsonia Zantedeschia aethiopica White Arum-lily

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

D

raft

for d

iscu

ssio

n pu

rpos

es

64

B.2

List

ed fl

ora

spec

ies

from

dat

abas

e se

arch

es

The

follo

win

g ta

ble

incl

udes

the

liste

d flo

ra s

peci

es th

at h

ave

pote

ntia

l to

occu

r w

ithin

the

stud

y ar

ea. T

he li

st o

f spe

cies

is s

ourc

ed fr

om th

e FI

S,

Vict

oria

n Bi

odiv

ersi

ty A

tlas

and

the

Prot

ecte

d M

atte

rs S

earc

h To

ol (D

oE; a

cces

sed

on 0

5.08

.14)

, or

adde

d by

Bio

sis

on th

e ba

sis

of e

xper

t opi

nion

.

Tabl

e B.

2. L

iste

d fl

ora

spec

ies

reco

rded

/ pr

edic

ted

to o

ccur

wit

hin

5 km

of t

he s

tudy

are

a

Scie

ntif

ic n

ame

Com

mon

nam

e Co

nser

vati

on

stat

us

Mos

t re

cent

da

taba

se

reco

rd

Oth

er

reco

rds

Hab

itat

des

crip

tion

Li

kely

occ

urre

nce

in S

tudy

Are

a

EPBC

St

ate

List

FF

G

Nat

iona

l Sig

nifi

canc

e Am

phib

rom

us

fluita

ns

Rive

r Sw

amp

Wal

laby

-gra

ss

VU

2007

PM

ST

Swam

py a

reas

, mai

nly

alon

g th

e M

urra

y Ri

ver

betw

een

Wod

onga

an

d Ec

huca

with

sca

tter

ed

reco

rds

from

sou

ther

n Vi

ctor

ia.

Pres

ent –

rec

orde

d in

mul

tiple

lo

catio

ns w

ithin

Blu

eSco

pe, r

efer

Fi

gure

A2.

Cala

deni

a in

sula

ris

Fren

ch Is

land

Sp

ider

-orc

hid

VU

v L

-

Den

se, w

et h

eath

and

hea

thy

woo

dlan

d (Je

anes

and

Bac

khou

se

2006

).

Low

– w

hile

this

spe

cies

app

ears

co

nfin

ed to

Fre

nch

Isla

nd, i

ts h

abita

t is

pre

sent

with

the

stud

y ar

ea a

nd it

co

ncei

vabl

e th

at it

s ra

nge

coul

d ex

tend

into

this

are

a.

Cala

deni

a or

ient

alis

Ea

ster

n Sp

ider

-or

chid

EN

e

L -

H

eath

and

hea

thy

woo

dlan

ds in

co

asta

l are

as b

etw

een

the

Mor

ning

ton

Peni

nsul

a an

d W

ilson

s Pr

omon

tory

.

Low

– H

abita

t for

this

spe

cies

is fo

und

with

in th

e st

udy

area

alth

ough

it h

as

not b

een

reco

rded

with

in th

e W

este

rn P

ort a

rea.

Cala

deni

a ro

bins

onii

Fran

ksto

n Sp

ider

-or

chid

EN

e

L -

Co

asta

l hea

thy

woo

dlan

d; o

nly

conf

irm

ed p

opul

atio

n is

nea

r Ro

sebu

d.

Neg

ligib

le –

ass

ocia

ted

vege

tatio

n ty

pes

pres

ent a

lthou

gh n

ot r

ecor

ded

in th

e W

este

rn P

ort a

rea.

Dia

nella

am

oena

M

atte

d Fl

ax-li

ly

EN

e L

-

Low

land

gra

ssla

nd a

nd g

rass

y w

oodl

and,

on

wel

l-dra

ined

to

seas

onal

ly w

ater

logg

ed fe

rtile

sa

ndy

loam

soi

ls to

hea

vy

crac

king

cla

ys (C

arte

r 20

10).

Low

– a

ssoc

iate

d ve

geta

tion

type

s ge

nera

lly s

carc

e.

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

D

raft

for d

iscu

ssio

n pu

rpos

es

65

Scie

ntif

ic n

ame

Com

mon

nam

e Co

nser

vati

on

stat

us

Mos

t re

cent

da

taba

se

reco

rd

Oth

er

reco

rds

Hab

itat

des

crip

tion

Li

kely

occ

urre

nce

in S

tudy

Are

a

EPBC

St

ate

List

FF

G

Euph

rasi

a co

llina

su

bsp.

mue

lleri

Purp

le E

yebr

ight

EN

e

L 19

19

G

rass

land

s an

d gr

assy

w

oodl

ands

; few

pop

ulat

ions

are

kn

own

to s

till e

xist

(Mur

phy

and

Dow

ne 2

006)

.

Low

– a

ssoc

iate

d ve

geta

tion

type

s ge

nera

lly s

carc

e.

Gly

cine

latr

obea

na

Clov

er G

lyci

ne

VU

v L

2009

PM

ST

Gra

ssla

nds

and

gras

sy

woo

dlan

ds, p

artic

ular

ly th

ose

dom

inat

ed b

y Th

emed

a tr

iand

ra.

Low

– a

ssoc

iate

d ve

geta

tion

type

s ge

nera

lly s

carc

e.

Pras

ophy

llum

fr

ench

ii M

aroo

n Le

ek-

orch

id

EN

e L

-

Gra

ssla

nd a

nd g

rass

y w

oodl

and

envi

ronm

ents

on

sand

y or

bla

ck

clay

loam

soi

ls th

at a

re g

ener

ally

da

mp

but w

ell d

rain

ed.

Low

– a

ssoc

iate

d ve

geta

tion

type

s ge

nera

lly s

carc

e.

Pras

ophy

llum

sp

icat

um

Den

se L

eek-

orch

id

VU

e

-

Hea

thla

nd a

nd H

eath

y W

oodl

ands

. M

ediu

m –

ass

ocia

ted

vege

tatio

n ty

pes

pres

ent.

Foun

d to

the

sout

h of

H

astin

gs a

t Cri

bb P

oint

.

Pter

osty

lis

chlo

rogr

amm

a G

reen

-str

iped

G

reen

hood

VU

v

L -

H

eath

y W

oodl

and,

Dam

p H

eath

y W

oodl

and

and

Low

land

For

est

(Coa

tes

et a

l. 20

02).

Med

ium

– a

ssoc

iate

d ve

geta

tion

type

s pr

esen

t. S

urve

ys h

ave

not b

een

unde

rtak

en d

urin

g th

e flo

wer

ing

seas

on o

f thi

s sp

ecie

s.

Pter

osty

lis c

ucul

lata

Le

afy

Gre

enho

od

VU

v L

-

Alka

line

scru

b do

min

ated

by

tea

tree

, she

oak

and

othe

r sh

rubs

N

eglig

ible

– li

mite

d ha

bita

t pre

sent

.

Sene

cio

psilo

carp

us

Swam

p Fi

rew

eed

VU

v

-

Seas

onal

ly-in

unda

ted

herb

-ric

h sw

amps

, gro

win

g on

pea

ty s

oils

or

vol

cani

c cl

ays

Low

– m

ay b

e fo

und

in w

etla

nd

vege

tatio

n.

Thel

ymitr

a ep

ipac

toid

es

Met

allic

Sun

-or

chid

EN

e

L -

M

oist

or

dry

sand

y lo

ams

or

loam

y sa

nds,

pri

mar

ily in

coa

stal

he

aths

, gra

ssla

nds

and

woo

dlan

ds, b

ut a

lso

in s

imila

r co

mm

uniti

es a

t dri

er in

land

site

s

Low

– s

ome

habi

tat p

rese

nt a

lthou

gh

not r

ecor

ded

in th

e W

este

rn P

ort

area

.

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

D

raft

for d

iscu

ssio

n pu

rpos

es

66

Scie

ntif

ic n

ame

Com

mon

nam

e Co

nser

vati

on

stat

us

Mos

t re

cent

da

taba

se

reco

rd

Oth

er

reco

rds

Hab

itat

des

crip

tion

Li

kely

occ

urre

nce

in S

tudy

Are

a

EPBC

St

ate

List

FF

G

Thel

ymitr

a m

atth

ewsi

i Sp

iral

Sun

-orc

hid

VU

L

-

Hea

thy

open

fore

st a

nd

woo

dlan

ds, o

n w

ell-d

rain

ed

sand

, gra

vel a

nd c

lay

loam

soi

ls

Low

– h

abita

t pre

sent

alth

ough

not

re

cord

ed in

the

Wes

tern

Por

t are

a.

Xero

chry

sum

pa

lust

re

Swam

p Ev

erla

stin

g VU

v

L -

Se

dge-

swam

ps a

nd s

hallo

w

fres

hwat

er m

arsh

es a

nd s

wam

ps

in lo

wla

nds,

on

blac

k cr

acki

ng

clay

soi

ls (C

arte

r an

d W

alsh

201

1)

Low

– m

ay b

e fo

und

in w

etla

nd

vege

tatio

n.

Stat

e Si

gnif

ican

ce

Acac

ia h

owitt

ii St

icky

Wat

tle

r

2006

Moi

st fo

rest

; Nat

ural

occ

urre

nces

ar

e co

nfin

ed to

Sou

th G

ipps

land

an

d Ce

ntra

l Hig

hlan

ds

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el.

Alte

rnan

ther

a sp

. 1

(Pla

ins)

Pl

ains

Joyw

eed

k

20

07

Cl

ay o

r gi

lgai

soi

ls o

f the

Riv

erin

a ar

ea a

nd d

rier

cla

y/cl

ay-lo

am

soils

of t

he b

asal

t pla

ins

wes

t of

Mel

bour

ne

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el.

Atrip

lex

palu

dosa

su

bsp.

pal

udos

a M

arsh

Sal

tbus

h

r

1999

Bogg

y, s

alin

e so

ils o

n co

asta

l or

near

-coa

stal

sal

tmar

shes

and

tid

al-fl

ats

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el.

Avic

enni

a m

arin

a su

bsp.

aus

tral

asic

a G

rey

Man

grov

e

r

2009

Low

ene

rgy

coas

tline

s in

the

inte

r-tid

al z

one

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el.

Caes

ia p

arvi

flora

va

r. m

inor

Pa

le G

rass

-lily

k

1977

Low

land

gra

ssla

nds

and

gras

sy

woo

dlan

ds, o

ften

in s

ites

with

po

or d

rain

age

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el.

Cala

deni

a au

rant

iaca

O

rang

e-tip

Fi

nger

-orc

hid

r

19

99

Lo

wla

nd fo

rest

and

hea

thy

woo

dlan

ds, t

ypic

ally

nea

r th

e co

ast

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

Cala

deni

a di

lata

ta

s.s.

G

reen

-com

b Sp

ider

-orc

hid

k

20

06

H

eath

y W

oodl

and,

Dam

p H

eath

y W

oodl

and

and

Low

land

For

est

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

D

raft

for d

iscu

ssio

n pu

rpos

es

67

Scie

ntif

ic n

ame

Com

mon

nam

e Co

nser

vati

on

stat

us

Mos

t re

cent

da

taba

se

reco

rd

Oth

er

reco

rds

Hab

itat

des

crip

tion

Li

kely

occ

urre

nce

in S

tudy

Are

a

EPBC

St

ate

List

FF

G

Cala

deni

a m

entie

ns

Cryp

tic P

ink-

finge

rs

k

20

03

H

eath

land

and

Hea

thy

Woo

dlan

d As

per

DEL

WP

habi

tat m

odel

Card

amin

e pa

uciju

ga s

.s.

Annu

al B

itter

-cr

ess

v

19

98

M

oist

fore

sts

and

ripa

rian

ha

bita

ts

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

Chilo

glot

tis X

pe

scot

tiana

Br

onze

Bir

d-or

chid

r

1997

Low

land

For

est

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

Chor

izan

dra

aust

ralis

So

uthe

rn B

rist

le-

sedg

e

k

1995

Swam

ps a

nd w

ater

hole

s.

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

Corr

ea re

flexa

var

. lo

bata

Po

wel

ltow

n Co

rrea

r

1981

Hea

thla

nd a

nd H

eath

y W

oodl

and

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

Coru

nast

ylis

cili

ata

Frin

ged

Mid

ge-

orch

id

k

19

65

H

eath

and

hea

thy

and

gras

sy

woo

dlan

ds

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

Cory

mbi

a m

acul

ata

Spot

ted

Gum

v

2009

In V

icto

ria

natu

rally

con

fined

to a

sm

all p

opul

atio

n ne

ar M

t Tar

a in

th

e ea

st o

f the

sta

te

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

Cras

pedi

a ca

nens

G

rey

Billy

-bu

tton

s

e L

1920

Low

alti

tude

gra

ssla

nds

betw

een

Cran

bour

ne a

nd T

rara

lgon

N

eglig

ible

– n

o ha

bita

t pre

sent

.

Dia

nella

sp.

aff

. lo

ngifo

lia

(Ben

ambr

a)

Arch

ing

Flax

-lily

v

2008

The

habi

tat r

equi

rem

ents

of t

his

spec

ies

are

poor

ly k

now

n As

per

DEL

WP

habi

tat m

odel

Diu

ris p

unct

ata

var.

pu

ncta

ta

Purp

le D

iuri

s

v L

1997

Fert

ile, l

oam

y so

ils a

nd

peri

odic

ally

wet

are

as in

low

land

gr

assl

ands

, gra

ssy

woo

dlan

ds,

heat

hy w

oodl

ands

and

ope

n he

athl

ands

Low

– a

ssoc

iate

d ve

geta

tion

type

s pr

esen

t. Re

cent

rec

ords

from

nea

rby.

Diu

ris s

ubal

pina

Sm

all S

nake

-or

chid

e

1919

Vari

ous

woo

dlan

ds a

nd fo

rest

As

per

DEL

WP

habi

tat m

odel

Ento

lasi

a st

ricta

U

prig

ht P

anic

k

2008

Dam

p H

eath

land

Pr

esen

t - r

ecor

ded

in B

lueS

cope

.

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

D

raft

for d

iscu

ssio

n pu

rpos

es

68

Scie

ntif

ic n

ame

Com

mon

nam

e Co

nser

vati

on

stat

us

Mos

t re

cent

da

taba

se

reco

rd

Oth

er

reco

rds

Hab

itat

des

crip

tion

Li

kely

occ

urre

nce

in S

tudy

Are

a

EPBC

St

ate

List

FF

G

Euca

lypt

us fu

lgen

s G

reen

Sce

ntba

rk

r

20

06

Fo

rest

s an

d w

oodl

ands

of t

he

Gip

psla

nd P

lain

and

adj

acen

t fo

othi

lls

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

Euca

lypt

us X

st

udle

yens

is

Stud

ley

Park

G

um

e

19

94

Sw

ampy

Woo

dlan

d an

d so

me

othe

r w

oodl

and

/ for

ests

As

per

DEL

WP

habi

tat m

odel

Euca

lypt

us

yarr

aens

is

Yarr

a G

um

r

20

05

Va

lley

flats

and

alo

ng s

trea

m o

n so

ils s

ubje

ct to

per

iodi

c in

unda

tion

or w

ater

logg

ing

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

Exoc

arpo

s sy

rtic

ola

Coas

t Bal

lart

r

1988

Coas

tal a

reas

As

per

DEL

WP

habi

tat m

odel

Junc

us re

volu

tus

Cree

ping

Rus

h

r

2008

Saltm

arsh

es a

nd o

ther

sim

ilarl

y sa

line

inla

nd h

abita

ts

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

Lach

nagr

ostis

pe

renn

is s

pp. a

gg.

Pere

nnia

l Blo

wn-

gras

s

k

1990

Wet

land

s

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

Lach

nagr

ostis

ro

bust

a Sa

lt Bl

own-

gras

s

r

2008

Mar

shy,

est

uari

ne h

abita

ts a

nd

moi

st s

andy

flat

s As

per

DEL

WP

habi

tat m

odel

Law

renc

ia s

pica

ta

Salt

Law

renc

ia

r

19

91

Fr

inge

hab

itats

of c

oast

al

saltm

arsh

com

mun

ities

As

per

DEL

WP

habi

tat m

odel

Lim

oniu

m a

ustr

ale

Yello

w S

ea-

lave

nder

r

2008

Mar

gins

of s

altm

arsh

es a

nd

othe

r si

mila

rly

salin

e in

land

ha

bita

ts

Mod

erat

e –

Reco

rded

just

out

side

the

sout

hern

par

t of t

he s

tudy

are

a at

the

end

of L

ong

Isla

nd D

rive

.

Lotu

s au

stra

lis v

ar.

aust

ralis

Au

stra

l Tre

foil

k

20

03

M

ostly

coa

stal

are

as

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

Mar

sile

a m

utic

a Sm

ooth

Nar

doo

k

19

98

W

etla

nds

Mel

aleu

ca a

rmill

aris

su

bsp.

arm

illar

is

Gia

nt H

oney

-m

yrtle

r

2011

Nea

r co

asta

l hea

th/s

crub

, roc

ky

coas

t and

foot

hill

outc

rops

As

per

DEL

WP

habi

tat m

odel

Pras

ophy

llum

lin

dley

anum

G

reen

Lee

k-or

chid

v

1919

Fert

ile s

oils

in w

oodl

and

or

scru

bby

heat

h As

per

DEL

WP

habi

tat m

odel

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

D

raft

for d

iscu

ssio

n pu

rpos

es

69

Scie

ntif

ic n

ame

Com

mon

nam

e Co

nser

vati

on

stat

us

Mos

t re

cent

da

taba

se

reco

rd

Oth

er

reco

rds

Hab

itat

des

crip

tion

Li

kely

occ

urre

nce

in S

tudy

Are

a

EPBC

St

ate

List

FF

G

Pter

osty

lis

pedo

glos

sa

Praw

n G

reen

hood

v

1997

Hea

th a

nd h

eath

y w

oodl

and

near

the

coas

t As

per

DEL

WP

habi

tat m

odel

Pter

osty

lis tu

nsta

llii

Gra

nite

G

reen

hood

v

1960

Low

land

and

foot

hill

fore

sts,

of

ten

on a

nd a

roun

d th

e ba

se o

f la

rge

gran

ite b

ould

ers

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

Rupp

ia m

ariti

ma

s.s.

W

ater

Tas

sel

k

19

80

W

ater

way

s As

per

DEL

WP

habi

tat m

odel

Sene

cio

glom

erat

us

subs

p. lo

ngifr

uctu

s An

nual

Fir

ewee

d

r

1921

Area

s ad

jace

nt to

str

eam

s,

swam

ps a

nd s

alin

e fla

ts

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

Spar

gani

um

subg

lobo

sum

Fl

oatin

g Bu

r-re

ed

k

19

54

W

ater

way

s As

per

DEL

WP

habi

tat m

odel

Thel

ione

ma

umbe

llatu

m

Clus

tere

d Li

ly

r

19

88

Sa

ndy,

oft

en p

oorl

y dr

aine

d so

ils

of h

eath

y w

oodl

ands

and

he

athl

ands

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

Thel

ymitr

a ci

rcum

sept

a N

aked

Sun

-or

chid

v

2007

In d

amp,

sha

ded

area

s in

hea

th,

woo

dlan

ds a

nd fo

rest

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

Thel

ymitr

a pa

llidi

flora

Pa

llid

Sun-

orch

id

e

20

08

H

eath

y W

oodl

and

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

Trig

loch

in

min

utis

sim

a Ti

ny A

rrow

gras

s

r

2008

Scat

tere

d oc

curr

ence

s on

dam

p sa

line

soils

nea

r sa

lt-la

kes,

and

fo

rmin

g pa

rt o

f her

bfie

lds

in

coas

tal s

altm

arsh

es

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

Utr

icul

aria

gib

ba

Floa

ting

Blad

derw

ort

v

19

96

Aq

uatic

Her

blan

d As

per

DEL

WP

habi

tat m

odel

Utr

icul

aria

uni

flora

Si

ngle

Bl

adde

rwor

t

k

1980

Aqua

tic H

erbl

and

As p

er D

ELW

P ha

bita

t mod

el

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 70

Appendix C. Fauna

Notes to tables:

EPBC Act:

EX - Extinct CR - Critically Endangered EN - Endangered VU - Vulnerable CD - Conservation dependent

State Advisory List:

ex - extinct cr - critically endangered en - endangered vu - vulnerable nt - near threatened dd - data deficient rx - regionally extinct

FFG Act:

L - listed as threatened under FFG Act

N - nominated for listing as threatened

I - determined ineligible for listing

Most recent database records are from the Victorian Biodiversity Atlas unless otherwise specified as follows

# – Protected Matters Search Tool

BA – Birds Australia

Fauna species in these tables are listed within their taxonomic group.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 71

C.1 Fauna species recorded from in the study area during the current survey Table C.1. Vertebrate fauna recorded from the study area

Status Scientific name Common name

INDIGENOUS SPECIES

Mammals

Antechinus agilis Agile Antechinus

Petaurus breviceps Sugar Glider

Phascolarctos cinereus Koala

Pseudocheirus peregrinus Ringtailed Possum

Rattus lutreolus Swamp Rat

Tachyglossus aculeatus Short beaked Echidna

Trichosurus vulpecula Common Brushtailed Possum

Wallabia bicolor Black Wallaby

Birds

Acanthiza chrysorrhoa Yellow-rumped Thornbill

Acanthiza pusilla Brown Thornbill

Acanthorhynchus tenuirostris Eastern Spinebill

Acrocephalus stentoreus Clamorous Reed Warbler

Aegotheles cristatus Australian Owlet-nightjar

Anas castanea Chestnut Teal

Anas gracilis Grey Teal

Anas superciliosa Pacific Black Duck

Anthochaera carunculata Red Wattlebird

Anthochaera chrysoptera Little Wattlebird

Anthus novaeseelandiae Australasian Pipit

Aquila audax Wedge-tailed Eagle

Artamus cyanopterus Dusky Woodswallow

vu Aythya australis Hardhead

Cacatua galerita Sulphur-crested Cockatoo

Cacatua sanguinea Little Corella

Cacomantis flabelliformis Fantail Cuckoo

Calamanthus fuliginosus Striated Fieldwren

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 72

Status Scientific name Common name

Calyptorhynchus funereus Yellow-tailed Black Cockatoo

Chenonetta jubata Australian Wood Duck

Chroicocephalus novaehollandiae Silver Gull

Chrysococcyx lucidus Shining Bronze-Cuckoo

Circus approximans Swamp Harrier

Cisticola exilis Golden-headed Cisticola

Colluricincla harmonica Grey Shrike-thrush

Coracina novaehollandiae Black-faced Cuckoo-shrike

Cormobates leucophaeus White-throated Treecreeper

Corvus mellori Little Raven

Coturnix pectoralis Stubble Quail

Cracticus tibicen Australian Magpie

Cracticus torquatus Grey Butcherbird

Cygnus atratus Black Swan

Dacelo novaeguineae Laughing Kookaburra

Dicaeum hirundinaceum Mistletoebird

Elanus axillaris Black-shouldered Kite

Eolophus roseicapillus Galah

Eopsaltria australis Eastern Yellow Robin

Epthianura albifrons White-fronted Chat

Falco berigora Brown Falcon

Falco cenchroides Nankeen Kestrel

Falco longipennis Australian Hobby

Falco peregrinus Peregrine Falcon

Falcunculus frontatus Crested Shrike-tit

Fulica atra Eurasian Coot

Grallina cyanoleuca Magpielark

Hirundo ariel Fairy Martin

Hirundo neoxena Welcome Swallow

nt, L Hydroprogne caspia Caspian Tern

nt Larus pacificus Pacific Gull

vu, L Lewinia pectoralis Lewin's Rail

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 73

Status Scientific name Common name

Lichenostomus chrysops Yellow-faced Honeyeater

Lichenostomus leucotis White-eared Honeyeater

Lichenostomus penicillatus White-plumed Honeyeater

Malurus cyaneus Superb Fairy-wren

Manorina melanocephala Noisy Miner

Manorina melanophrys Bell Miner

Melithreptus lunatus White-naped Honeyeater

Morus serrator Australasian Gannet

Neochmia temporalis Red-browed Finch

Ocyphaps lophotes Crested Pigeon

en, L Oxyura australis Blue-billed Duck

Pachycephala pectoralis Golden Whistler

Pardalotus punctatus Spotted Pardalote

Pardalotus striatus Striated Pardalote

Pelecanus conspicillatus Australian Pelican

Phalacrocorax carbo Great Cormorant

Phalacrocorax sulcirostris Little Black Cormorant

nt Phalacrocorax varius Pied Cormorant

Phaps chalcoptera Common Bronzewing

Phaps elegans Brush Bronzewing

Phylidonyris novaehollandiae New Holland Honeyeater

Platycercus elegans Crimson Rosella

Platycercus eximius Eastern Rosella

Podargus strigoides Tawny Frogmouth

Poliocephalus poliocephalus Hoary-headed Grebe

Porphyrio porphyrio Purple Swamphen

Porzana tabuensis Spotless Crake

Rhipidura albiscapa Grey Fantail

Rhipidura leucophrys Willie Wagtail

Sericornis frontalis White-browed Scrubwren

Strepera versicolor Grey Currawong

Tadorna tadornoides Australian Shelduck

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 74

Status Scientific name Common name

Thalaseus bergii Crested Tern

Todiramphus sanctus Sacred Kingfisher

Trichoglossus haematodus Rainbow Lorikeet

Zoothera lunulata Bassian Thrush

Zosterops lateralis Silvereye

Reptiles

Amphibolurus muricatus Jacky Lizard

Austrelaps superbus Lowland Copperhead

dd Chelodina longicollis Common Long-necked Turtle

Lampropholis guichenoti Garden Skink

Notechis scutatus Mainland Tiger Snake

Tiliqua nigrolutea Blotched Blue-tongued Lizard

Frogs

Crinia signifera Common Froglet

Limnodynastes dumerilli Eastern Banjo Frog

Litoria peronii Peron's Tree Frog

Limnodynastes tasmaniensis Spotted Grass Frog

Limnodynastes peronii Striped Marsh Frog

Litoria verreauxii Whistling Tree Frog

INTRODUCED SPECIES

Mammals

Cervus unicolor Sambar

Lepus europeaus Brown Hare

Mus musculus House Mouse

Oryctolagus cuniculus European Rabbit

Rattus rattus Black Rat

Vulpes vulpes Red Fox

Birds

Alauda arvensis European Skylark

Carduelis carduelis European Goldfinch

Passer domesticus House Sparrow

Streptopelia chinensis Spotted Turtle-dove

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 75

Status Scientific name Common name

Sturnus tristis Common Myna

Sturnus vulgaris Common Starling

Turdus merula Common Blackbird

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

D

raft

for d

iscu

ssio

n pu

rpos

es

76

C.2

List

ed fa

una

spec

ies

from

dat

abas

e se

arch

es

The

follo

win

g ta

ble

incl

udes

a li

st o

f the

list

ed fa

una

spec

ies

that

hav

e po

tent

ial t

o oc

cur

with

in th

e st

udy

area

. The

list

of s

peci

es is

sou

rced

from

the

Vict

oria

n Bi

odiv

ersi

ty A

tlas

and

the

Prot

ecte

d M

atte

rs S

earc

h To

ol (D

oE; a

cces

sed

on 0

5.08

.14)

, or

adde

d by

Bio

sis

on th

e ba

sis

of e

xper

t opi

nion

.

Tabl

e C.

2: L

iste

d fa

una

spec

ies

reco

rded

, or

pred

icte

d to

occ

ur, w

ithi

n 5

km o

f the

stu

dy a

rea

Scie

ntif

ic

nam

e Co

mm

on

nam

e Co

nser

vati

on

stat

us

Mos

t re

cent

da

taba

se

reco

rd

Oth

er

reco

rds

Hab

itat

des

crip

tion

Li

kely

oc

curr

ence

in

Stu

dy A

rea

EPBC

St

ate

List

FF

G

Mam

mal

s Is

oodo

n ob

esul

us

obes

ulus

Sout

hern

Br

own

Band

icoo

t

EN

nt

L 20

08

PMST

Th

e sp

ecie

s in

habi

ts h

eath

y w

oodl

ands

and

oth

er v

eget

atio

n co

mm

uniti

es o

f san

dy s

oils

. The

pre

senc

e of

the

spec

ies

was

no

t con

firm

ed d

urin

g th

e pr

esen

t inv

estig

atio

n. It

is k

now

n fr

om th

e H

astin

gs a

nd Y

arin

ga a

reas

and

hab

itats

with

in th

e st

udy

area

are

sui

tabl

e. T

he s

peci

es is

like

ly to

occ

ur th

ere.

Hig

h

Poto

rous

tr

idac

tylu

s tr

idac

tylu

s

Long

-nos

ed

Poto

roo

VU

en

L 19

78

PMST

Si

x po

pula

tions

of L

ong-

nose

d Po

toro

o oc

cur

in V

icto

ria

with

in

a ra

nge

of h

abita

ts fr

om o

pen

fore

sts

to h

eath

y w

oodl

ands

. Th

is s

peci

es d

oes

not o

ccur

on

the

Mor

ning

ton

Peni

nsul

a or

vi

cini

ty o

f Wes

tern

Por

t.

Neg

ligib

le

Pseu

dom

ys

fum

eus

Smok

y M

ouse

EN

cr

L

- PM

ST

Dis

junc

t Vic

tori

an d

istr

ibut

ion

with

pop

ulat

ions

in th

e Sn

owfie

lds,

Eas

tern

Hig

hlan

ds, E

ast G

ipps

land

, Otw

ay R

ange

an

d th

e G

ram

pian

s. T

his

spec

ies

does

not

occ

ur o

n th

e M

orni

ngto

n Pe

nins

ula.

Neg

ligib

le

Pseu

dom

ys

nova

ehol

land

iae

New

Hol

land

M

ouse

VU

vu

L

1984

PM

ST

The

spec

ies

is n

ow c

onsi

dere

d to

be

conf

ined

to tw

o lo

calit

ies

in V

icto

ria.

It w

as r

ecor

ded

duri

ng th

e 19

70s

and

earl

y 19

80s

from

hea

thy

vege

tatio

n co

mm

uniti

es n

ear

Has

tings

and

Cri

b Po

int.

See

beck

& M

enkh

orst

(200

0) c

onsi

dere

d th

at it

had

ap

pare

ntly

bec

ome

extin

ct o

n M

orni

ngto

n Pe

nins

ula

with

in th

e pr

eced

ing

15 y

ears

. The

spe

cies

was

not

det

ecte

d du

ring

the

pres

ent i

nves

tigat

ion.

Veg

etat

ion

com

mun

ities

with

in th

e st

udy

area

are

app

ropr

iate

but

app

ear

to b

e to

o-lo

ng u

nbur

nt to

be

suita

ble

for

the

spec

ies

(DSE

200

3).

Low

Pter

opus

po

lioce

phal

us

Gre

y-he

aded

Fl

ying

-fox

VU

vu

L -

PMST

Th

is s

peci

es u

tilis

es a

ran

ge o

f hab

itats

from

low

land

rai

nfor

est

in E

ast G

ipps

land

and

coa

stal

Str

ingy

bark

fore

sts

to a

gric

ultu

ral

land

and

orn

amen

tal a

nd fr

uitin

g tr

ees,

with

per

man

ently

Low

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

D

raft

for d

iscu

ssio

n pu

rpos

es

77

Scie

ntif

ic

nam

e Co

mm

on

nam

e Co

nser

vati

on

stat

us

Mos

t re

cent

da

taba

se

reco

rd

Oth

er

reco

rds

Hab

itat

des

crip

tion

Li

kely

oc

curr

ence

in

Stu

dy A

rea

EPBC

St

ate

List

FF

G

esta

blis

hed

colo

nies

in M

elbo

urne

, Gee

long

and

Mal

laco

ota

(Van

Dyc

k an

d St

raha

n 20

08).

It is

not

like

ly to

occ

ur w

ithin

the

stud

y ar

ea.

Smin

thop

sis

leuc

opus

W

hite

-foo

ted

Dun

nart

nt

L 19

70

Th

is s

peci

es in

habi

ts d

iver

se v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

but o

n th

e G

ipps

land

Pla

in it

is fr

eque

ntly

ass

ocia

ted

with

hea

thy

vege

tatio

n co

mm

uniti

es. I

t was

not

det

ecte

d du

ring

the

pres

ent

inve

stig

atio

n. T

here

are

rec

ords

of t

his

spec

ies

to th

e so

uth

of

Has

tings

and

sui

tabl

e ha

bita

t occ

urs

with

in th

e st

udy

area

, al

thou

gh it

is u

nlik

ely

to in

habi

t the

site

.

Med

ium

Bird

s

Acci

pite

r no

vaeh

olla

ndia

e G

rey

Gos

haw

k

vu

L 20

11

Re

liant

on

mat

ure

fore

sts

for

bree

ding

. N

ot r

esid

ent o

n M

orni

ngto

n Pe

nins

ula

or v

icin

ity o

f Wes

tern

Por

t and

ext

rem

ely

rare

ly d

ocum

ente

d fr

om th

ese

area

s.

Neg

ligib

le

Anas

rhyn

chot

is

Aust

rala

sian

Sh

ovel

er

vu

2013

Pref

ers

larg

e, p

erm

anen

t lak

es a

nd s

wam

ps w

ith a

bund

ant

aqua

tic v

eget

atio

n. A

ppro

pria

te h

abita

t for

the

spec

ies

was

id

entif

ied

at la

rge

artif

icia

l wet

land

s on

McK

irdy

’s Ck

, eas

t of

McK

irdy

’s Rd

.

As p

er

DEL

WP’

s ha

bita

t mod

el

Anse

rana

s se

mip

alm

ata

Mag

pie

Goo

se

nt

L

2008

Use

s aq

uatic

and

terr

estr

ial h

abita

t, al

thou

gh m

ost a

ctiv

ity

occu

rs o

n w

etla

nds

such

as

thos

e as

soci

ated

with

floo

d pl

ains

. H

isto

rica

lly o

ccur

red

in s

outh

-eas

tern

Aus

tral

ia, b

ut lo

ss o

f w

etla

nd h

abita

ts m

eant

the

spec

ies

beca

me

extin

ct in

Vic

tori

a in

the

earl

y 19

00s.

Re-

intr

oduc

tions

hav

e re

sulte

d in

som

e re

-es

tabl

ishe

d po

pula

tions

. Ra

re r

ecor

ds e

xist

from

the

vici

nity

of

Wes

tern

Por

t.

Low

Anth

ocha

era

phry

gia

Rege

nt

Hon

eyea

ter

EN

cr

L -

PMST

In

habi

ts d

ry w

oodl

ands

dom

inat

ed b

y Bo

x Ir

onba

rk e

ucal

ypts

. D

istr

ibut

ion

in V

icto

ria

curr

ently

res

tric

ted

to th

e Ch

ilter

n - M

t Pi

lot N

atio

nal P

ark

in n

orth

-eas

t of t

he s

tate

follo

win

g se

vere

ra

nge

cont

ract

ion

and

popu

latio

n de

clin

e. T

here

are

no

rece

nt

reco

rds

of th

e sp

ecie

s fr

om th

e vi

cini

ty o

f Wes

tern

Por

t.

Neg

ligib

le

Arde

a in

term

edia

In

term

edia

te

Egre

t

cr

L 20

01

O

ccup

ies

a w

ide

rang

e of

wet

land

s an

d ty

pica

lly p

refe

rs th

e sh

allo

ws

of w

etla

nds

for

fora

ging

act

iviti

es.

The

spec

ies

rare

ly

visi

ts s

outh

ern

Vict

oria

.

Low

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

D

raft

for d

iscu

ssio

n pu

rpos

es

78

Scie

ntif

ic

nam

e Co

mm

on

nam

e Co

nser

vati

on

stat

us

Mos

t re

cent

da

taba

se

reco

rd

Oth

er

reco

rds

Hab

itat

des

crip

tion

Li

kely

oc

curr

ence

in

Stu

dy A

rea

EPBC

St

ate

List

FF

G

Arde

a m

odes

ta

East

ern

Gre

at

Egre

t

vu

L 20

13

PMST

Th

e sp

ecie

s ut

ilise

s a

wid

e ra

nge

of w

etla

nds

and

pref

ers

the

shal

low

s of

wet

land

s fo

r fo

ragi

ng a

ctiv

ities

. U

ses

estu

arin

e m

udfla

ts a

s su

mm

er-a

utum

n or

dro

ught

ref

uges

. It

was

re

cord

ed d

urin

g th

e pr

esen

t inv

estig

atio

n.

Hig

h

Ayth

ya a

ustr

alis

H

ardh

ead

vu

2013

A m

ainl

y aq

uatic

spe

cies

pre

ferr

ing

larg

e, d

eep

fres

hwat

er

envi

ronm

ents

with

abu

ndan

t aqu

atic

veg

etat

ion.

Occ

asio

nally

in

est

uari

ne a

nd li

ttor

al h

abita

ts a

nd s

helte

red

insh

ore

wat

ers.

Re

cord

ed d

urin

g th

e pr

esen

t inv

estig

atio

n.

As p

er

DEL

WP’

s ha

bita

t mod

el

Bizi

ura

loba

ta

Mus

k D

uck

vu

2010

A la

rgel

y aq

uatic

spe

cies

pre

ferr

ing

deep

wat

er o

f per

man

ent

wet

land

s, e

stua

ries

and

pro

tect

ed b

ays.

App

ropr

iate

hab

itat

for

the

spec

ies

was

iden

tifie

d at

larg

e ar

tific

ial w

etla

nds

on

McK

irdy

’s Ck

, eas

t of M

cKir

dy’s

Rd.

As p

er

DEL

WP’

s ha

bita

t mod

el

Bota

urus

po

icilo

ptilu

s Au

stra

lasi

an

Bitt

ern

EN

en

L 20

07

PMST

O

ccur

s in

per

man

ent f

resh

wat

er w

etla

nds

with

tall,

den

se

vege

tatio

n w

here

it fo

rage

s in

sha

llow

wat

er.

The

spec

ies

has

prev

ious

ly b

een

reco

rded

in th

e lo

cal a

rea.

App

ropr

iate

hab

itat

for

the

spec

ies

was

iden

tifie

d at

larg

e ar

tific

ial w

etla

nds

on

McK

irdy

’s Ck

, eas

t of M

cKir

dy’s

Rd.

Hig

h

Ceyx

azu

reus

Az

ure

King

fishe

r

nt

20

11

As

soci

ated

with

wel

l veg

etat

ed fr

eshw

ater

wet

land

s an

d oc

casi

onal

ly a

mon

g m

angr

oves

in s

helte

red

coas

tal a

reas

. Ra

rely

rec

orde

d fr

om W

este

rn P

ort b

ut h

abita

t in

part

s of

site

ar

e su

itabl

e.

As p

er

DEL

WP’

s ha

bita

t mod

el

Chlid

onia

s hy

brid

a W

hisk

ered

Te

rn

nt

2006

A br

eedi

ng m

igra

nt to

Aus

tral

ia fr

om S

epte

mbe

r to

Mar

ch

whe

re it

occ

urs

at w

etla

nds

with

sub

mer

ged

and

emer

gent

ve

geta

tion

such

as

gras

ses,

sed

ges,

ree

ds a

nd r

ushe

s. S

ome

coas

tal a

reas

of t

he s

ite a

ppea

r su

itabl

e fo

r it.

Hig

h

Chth

onic

ola

sagi

ttata

Sp

eckl

ed

War

bler

vu

L 19

09

O

ccur

s in

ope

n fo

rest

and

Box

Iron

bark

Woo

dlan

ds. G

ener

ally

ab

sent

from

hig

her

rain

fall

area

s of

Vic

tori

a. T

here

are

no

reco

rds

of th

e sp

ecie

s fr

om M

orni

ngto

n Pe

nins

ula

or v

icin

ity o

f W

este

rn P

ort.

Neg

ligib

le

Cinc

loso

ma

punc

tatu

m

Spot

ted

Qua

il-th

rush

nt

19

29

O

ccur

s in

dri

er fo

rest

s an

d w

oodl

ands

of s

outh

eas

tern

Au

stra

lia.

Mai

nly

asso

ciat

ed w

ith h

ill c

ount

ry a

nd v

ery

rare

ly

reco

rded

from

vic

inity

of W

este

rn P

ort.

As p

er

DEL

WP’

s ha

bita

t mod

el

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

D

raft

for d

iscu

ssio

n pu

rpos

es

79

Scie

ntif

ic

nam

e Co

mm

on

nam

e Co

nser

vati

on

stat

us

Mos

t re

cent

da

taba

se

reco

rd

Oth

er

reco

rds

Hab

itat

des

crip

tion

Li

kely

oc

curr

ence

in

Stu

dy A

rea

EPBC

St

ate

List

FF

G

Circ

us a

ssim

ilis

Spot

ted

Har

rier

nt

20

13

In

habi

ts o

pen

and

woo

ded

coun

try

of in

land

and

sub

-inla

nd

Aust

ralia

, whe

re th

ey h

unt o

ver

flat o

r un

dula

ting

coun

try

with

lo

w v

eget

atio

n co

ver.

Mos

t com

mon

ove

r th

e M

urra

y Va

lley

with

occ

asio

nal v

isits

to c

oast

al V

icto

ria.

As p

er

DEL

WP’

s ha

bita

t mod

el

Egre

tta g

arze

tta

Litt

le E

gret

en

L 20

12

O

ccup

ies

a w

ide

rang

e of

wet

land

s an

d ty

pica

lly p

refe

rs th

e sh

allo

ws

of w

etla

nds

for

fora

ging

act

iviti

es.

Such

are

as in

the

site

are

sui

tabl

e fo

r th

e sp

ecie

s.

Hig

h

Exca

lfact

oria

ch

inen

sis

King

Qua

il

en

L 19

81

Th

e sp

ecie

s ha

s a

pref

eren

ce fo

r w

et h

eath

env

iron

men

ts

whe

re th

ey fe

ed a

nd n

est o

n th

e gr

ound

, but

hav

e al

so b

een

reco

rded

in c

oast

al h

eath

. W

hile

ther

e is

a p

opul

atio

n on

Fr

ench

Isla

nd in

Wes

tern

Por

t, th

ere

are

no r

ecor

ds o

f it o

n M

orni

ngto

n Pe

nins

ula

and

it is

unl

ikel

y th

at a

pop

ulat

ion

exis

ts

ther

e.

Low

Falc

o su

bnig

er

Blac

k Fa

lcon

vu

20

08

Pr

imar

ily o

ccur

s in

ari

d an

d se

mi-a

rid

zone

s in

nor

th a

nd w

est

of V

icto

ria.

Not

res

iden

t on

Mor

ning

ton

Peni

nsul

a or

vic

inity

of

Wes

tern

Por

t and

ext

rem

ely

rare

ly d

ocum

ente

d fr

om th

ese

area

s.

As p

er

DEL

WP’

s ha

bita

t mod

el

Gal

linag

o ha

rdw

icki

i La

tham

's

Snip

e

nt

20

13

PMST

A

mig

rant

to A

ustr

alia

from

July

to A

pril

occu

rrin

g in

a w

ide

vari

ety

of p

erm

anen

t and

eph

emer

al w

etla

nds

and

thei

r m

argi

ns.

Such

are

as in

the

site

are

sui

tabl

e fo

r th

e sp

ecie

s.

As p

er

DEL

WP’

s ha

bita

t G

eloc

helid

on

nilo

tica

Gul

l-bill

ed

Tern

en

L 20

07

Th

e sp

ecie

s oc

curs

on

shal

low

terr

estr

ial w

etla

nds,

less

oft

en

usin

g sh

elte

red

coas

tal e

nvir

onm

ents

. In

Aus

tral

ia m

ainl

y br

eeds

in in

land

are

as fo

llow

ing

maj

or fl

oodi

ng e

vent

s.

Hig

h

Geo

pelia

cu

neat

a D

iam

ond

Dov

e

nt

L 20

12

Th

is s

peci

es is

not

indi

geno

us to

the

Mor

ning

ton

Peni

nsul

a an

d re

cord

s m

ost l

ikel

y re

late

to a

viar

y es

cape

es.

Neg

ligib

le

Gra

ntie

lla p

icta

Pa

inte

d H

oney

eate

r

vu

L 20

12

A

mig

rato

ry s

peci

es th

at b

reed

s in

sou

ther

n Au

stra

lia, i

t oc

cupi

es d

ry o

pen

woo

dlan

ds a

nd fo

rest

s pr

imar

ily o

n th

e in

land

foot

hills

of t

he G

reat

Div

ing

Rang

e. T

here

are

no

reco

rds

of th

e sp

ecie

s fr

om th

e vi

cini

ty o

f Wes

tern

Por

t.

Neg

ligib

le

Gru

s ru

bicu

nda

Brol

ga

vu

L

1845

Pref

ers

shal

low

mar

shla

nd a

reas

. Vi

ctor

ian

popu

latio

ns a

re

conf

ined

to th

e so

uth-

wes

t and

the

Nor

ther

n Pl

ains

. Th

is

spec

ies

does

not

occ

ur o

n th

e M

orni

ngto

n Pe

nins

ula.

Neg

ligib

le

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

D

raft

for d

iscu

ssio

n pu

rpos

es

80

Scie

ntif

ic

nam

e Co

mm

on

nam

e Co

nser

vati

on

stat

us

Mos

t re

cent

da

taba

se

reco

rd

Oth

er

reco

rds

Hab

itat

des

crip

tion

Li

kely

oc

curr

ence

in

Stu

dy A

rea

EPBC

St

ate

List

FF

G

Hal

iaee

tus

leuc

ogas

ter

Whi

te-b

ellie

d Se

a-Ea

gle

vu

L

2011

PM

ST

Occ

urs

in m

arin

e ha

bita

ts a

nd la

rge

fres

hwat

er w

etla

nds.

A

smal

l res

iden

t pop

ulat

ion

occu

pies

Wes

tern

Por

t are

a.

Hig

h

Hyd

ropr

ogne

ca

spia

Ca

spia

n Te

rn

nt

L

2011

Occ

urs

on e

xpos

ed o

cean

bea

ches

or

in s

helte

red

coas

tal

envi

ronm

ents

. Re

cord

ed d

urin

g th

e pr

esen

t inv

estig

atio

n.

Hig

h

Hyl

acol

a py

rrho

pygi

a Ch

estn

ut-

rum

ped

Hea

thw

ren

vu

L

2003

Occ

urs

in s

hrub

land

and

in d

ense

scr

ubby

are

as o

f for

ests

and

w

oodl

ands

. The

re a

re fe

w r

ecor

ds o

f the

spe

cies

from

the

loca

l ar

ea b

ut it

is c

rypt

ic a

nd m

ay in

habi

t the

stu

dy a

rea.

Low

Ixob

rych

us

min

utus

dub

ius

Litt

le B

itter

n

en

L 20

02

In

habi

ts fr

eshw

ater

wet

land

s, p

refe

rabl

y w

ith d

ense

em

erge

nt

vege

tatio

n. P

oten

tial h

abita

t for

the

spec

ies

was

iden

tifie

d at

la

rge

artif

icia

l wet

land

s on

McK

irdy

’s Ck

, eas

t of M

cKir

dy’s

Rd.

Med

ium

Laru

s pa

cific

us

Paci

fic G

ull

nt

2013

Occ

urs

alon

g co

asts

usu

ally

in a

reas

pro

tect

ed fr

om o

cean

sw

ells

, suc

h as

bay

s es

tuar

ies

and

lago

ons.

Som

etim

es o

ccur

s up

to 1

0 ki

lom

etre

s in

land

. So

me

port

ions

of t

he s

ite a

re

suita

ble

for

it.

Hig

h

Lath

amus

di

scol

or

Swift

Par

rot

EN

en

L 20

11

PMST

M

igra

tes

from

Tas

man

ia to

sou

th-e

ast m

ainl

and

Aust

ralia

du

ring

the

win

ter

mon

ths

whe

re it

pre

fers

Box

Iron

bark

For

est

in n

orth

-cen

tral

Vic

tori

a. A

lso

utili

ses

flow

erin

g or

nam

enta

l eu

caly

pts.

Rar

ely

reco

rded

from

Mor

ning

ton

Peni

nsul

a w

here

re

cord

s ar

e m

ostly

from

orn

amen

tal e

ucal

ypts

.

Low

Lew

inia

pe

ctor

alis

Le

win

's R

ail

vu

L

2013

The

spec

ies

inha

bits

den

sely

veg

etat

ed w

etla

nds,

incl

udin

g sw

amps

, far

m d

ams,

sal

tmar

shes

, lak

es a

nd s

mal

l poo

ls th

at

can

rang

e fr

om fr

esh

to s

alin

e w

ater

. It

was

rec

orde

d du

ring

th

e pr

esen

t inv

estig

atio

n.

Hig

h (r

ecor

ded

on

site

)

Mel

anod

ryas

cu

culla

ta

Hoo

ded

Robi

n

nt

L 20

08

O

ccup

ies

a ra

nge

of o

pen

woo

dlan

ds. O

ccas

iona

lly v

isits

so

uthe

rn V

icto

ria

and

rare

ly r

ecor

ded

from

vic

inity

of W

este

rn

Port

.

Med

ium

Neo

phem

a ch

ryso

gast

er

Ora

nge-

belli

ed P

arro

t CR

cr

L

1987

PM

ST

Annu

al m

igra

nt to

coa

stal

Vic

tori

a fr

om b

reed

ing

grou

nds

in

sout

h-w

est T

asm

ania

, app

eari

ng fr

om M

arch

to O

ctob

er.

Fora

ges

on c

oast

al o

r ne

ar-c

oast

al a

reas

of s

altm

arsh

and

du

nes.

Rec

ords

from

Wes

tern

Por

t, in

clud

ing

clos

e to

stu

dy

site

, mos

tly fr

om b

efor

e ea

rly

1990

s.

Low

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

D

raft

for d

iscu

ssio

n pu

rpos

es

81

Scie

ntif

ic

nam

e Co

mm

on

nam

e Co

nser

vati

on

stat

us

Mos

t re

cent

da

taba

se

reco

rd

Oth

er

reco

rds

Hab

itat

des

crip

tion

Li

kely

oc

curr

ence

in

Stu

dy A

rea

EPBC

St

ate

List

FF

G

Neo

phem

a pu

lche

lla

Turq

uois

e Pa

rrot

nt

L 19

82

O

ccup

ies

woo

dlan

ds a

nd o

pen

fore

sts

in th

e fo

othi

lls o

f the

G

reat

Div

idin

g Ra

nge.

Not

res

iden

t on

Mor

ning

ton

Peni

nsul

a an

d ex

trem

ely

rare

ly d

ocum

ente

d fr

om v

icin

ity o

f Wes

tern

Po

rt.

Neg

ligib

le

Nin

ox c

onni

vens

Ba

rkin

g O

wl

en

L

2005

Pref

ers

dry,

ope

n sc

lero

phyl

l for

ests

and

woo

dlan

ds.

Not

re

side

nt o

n M

orni

ngto

n Pe

nins

ula

and

extr

emel

y ra

rely

do

cum

ente

d fr

om v

icin

ity o

f Wes

tern

Por

t.

Neg

ligib

le

Nin

ox s

tren

ua

Pow

erfu

l Ow

l

vu

L 20

13

Pr

efer

s ta

ll op

en s

cler

ophy

ll fo

rest

and

woo

dlan

ds.

Not

re

side

nt o

n M

orni

ngto

n Pe

nins

ula

and

extr

emel

y ra

rely

do

cum

ente

d fr

om v

icin

ity o

f Wes

tern

Por

t.

Neg

ligib

le

Nyc

ticor

ax

cale

doni

cus

hilli

i N

anke

en

Nig

ht H

eron

nt

20

13

O

ccup

ies

a w

ide

rang

e of

wet

land

s an

d ty

pica

lly p

refe

rs th

e sh

allo

ws

of w

etla

nds

for

fora

ging

act

iviti

es.

The

spec

ies

has

been

rec

ently

rec

orde

d in

the

stud

y ar

ea.

As p

er

DEL

WP’

s ha

bita

t O

xyur

a au

stra

lis

Blue

-bill

ed

Duc

k

en

L 20

13

U

sual

ly fo

und

on d

ense

ly v

eget

ated

fres

hwat

er w

etla

nds,

in

clud

ing

Mel

aleu

ca s

wam

ps. A

ppro

pria

te h

abita

t for

the

spec

ies

was

iden

tifie

d at

larg

e ar

tific

ial w

etla

nds

on M

cKir

dy’s

Ck, e

ast o

f McK

irdy

’s Rd

.

Hig

h

Pezo

poru

s w

allic

us

Gro

und

Parr

ot

en

L

1845

Occ

urs

in h

eath

land

, sed

gela

nd o

r bu

tton

gras

s pl

ains

of e

ast

Gip

psla

nd, W

ilson

's P

rom

onto

ry a

nd fa

r w

este

rn V

icto

ria.

No

reco

rds

or s

uita

ble

habi

tats

nea

r W

este

rn P

ort.

Neg

ligib

le

Phal

acro

cora

x va

rius

Pied

Co

rmor

ant

nt

2011

The

spec

ies

is d

istr

ibut

ed a

long

the

Vict

oria

n co

ast.

It w

as

reco

rded

from

cro

wn

coas

tal l

and

near

the

Esso

faci

lity.

It i

s lik

ely

to u

se th

e en

tire

coas

tal f

ring

e of

the

stud

y ar

ea.

Hig

h (r

ecor

ded

on

site

) Pl

atal

ea re

gia

Roya

l Sp

oonb

ill

vu

2013

Use

s sh

allo

w fr

eshw

ater

wet

land

s an

d co

asta

l hab

itats

suc

h as

es

tuar

ies,

inle

ts a

nd in

tert

idal

mud

flats

. It

was

rec

orde

d du

ring

th

e pr

esen

t inv

estig

atio

n.

As p

er

DEL

WP’

s ha

bita

t mod

el

Pleg

adis

fa

lcin

ellu

s G

loss

y Ib

is

nt

2006

Glo

ssy

Ibis

are

usu

ally

foun

d fo

ragi

ng in

wet

pas

ture

en

viro

nmen

ts a

nd lo

w ly

ing

wet

land

are

as.

This

spe

cies

is o

nly

rare

ly r

ecor

ded

in V

icto

ria.

As p

er

DEL

WP’

s ha

bita

t mod

el

Pom

atos

tom

us

tem

pora

lis

Gre

y-cr

owne

d Ba

bble

r

en

L 20

00

Ty

pica

lly o

ccup

ies

open

fore

sts

and

woo

dlan

ds. V

icto

rian

po

pula

tion

is n

ow la

rgel

y co

nfin

ed to

are

as n

orth

of t

he G

reat

D

ivid

ing

Rang

e. A

form

er p

opul

atio

n on

Mor

ning

ton

Peni

nsul

a is

con

side

red

to b

e ex

tinct

sin

ce a

ppro

xim

atel

y 20

00.

Neg

ligib

le

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

D

raft

for d

iscu

ssio

n pu

rpos

es

82

Scie

ntif

ic

nam

e Co

mm

on

nam

e Co

nser

vati

on

stat

us

Mos

t re

cent

da

taba

se

reco

rd

Oth

er

reco

rds

Hab

itat

des

crip

tion

Li

kely

oc

curr

ence

in

Stu

dy A

rea

EPBC

St

ate

List

FF

G

Porz

ana

pusi

lla

Baill

on's

Cr

ake

vu

L

2011

This

spe

cies

occ

urs

in a

var

iety

of d

ense

ly v

eget

ated

terr

estr

ial

and

coas

tal w

etla

nds.

Som

e po

rtio

ns o

f the

site

app

ear

suita

ble

for

it.

Hig

h

Rost

ratu

la

aust

ralis

Au

stra

lian

Pain

ted

Snip

e EN

cr

L

- PM

ST

Gen

eral

ly fo

und

in s

hallo

w, t

erre

stri

al fr

eshw

ater

wet

land

s w

ith

rank

, em

erge

nt tu

ssoc

k ve

geta

tion.

The

spe

cies

is a

hig

hly

nom

adic

and

is v

ery

rare

ly r

ecor

ded

in s

outh

ern

Vict

oria

and

is

unlik

ely

to o

ccur

at t

he s

ite.

Low

Stag

onop

leur

a gu

ttata

D

iam

ond

Fire

tail

vu

L

1908

Occ

urs

mos

tly in

gra

ssy

woo

dlan

ds o

f the

low

land

s an

d fo

othi

lls in

the

nort

h of

Vic

tori

a. T

here

are

no

reco

rds

of th

e sp

ecie

s fr

om th

e vi

cini

ty o

f Wes

tern

Por

t.

Neg

ligib

le

Stic

tone

tta

naev

osa

Frec

kled

Duc

k

en

L 20

12

U

sual

ly fo

und

on d

ense

ly v

eget

ated

fres

hwat

er w

etla

nds.

D

urin

g dr

y co

nditi

ons

the

bird

s m

ove

from

eph

emer

al

wet

land

s to

larg

e ar

eas

of p

erm

anen

t ope

n w

ater

. Ap

prop

riat

e ha

bita

t for

the

spec

ies

was

iden

tifie

d at

larg

e ar

tific

ial w

etla

nds

on M

cKir

dy’s

Ck, e

ast o

f McK

irdy

’s Rd

.

Med

ium

Rept

iles

Chel

odin

a lo

ngic

ollis

Co

mm

on

Long

-nec

ked

Turt

le

dd

2014

Nat

ural

and

man

-mad

e w

ater

bodi

es a

nd w

etla

nds

(Cog

ger

2014

). R

ecor

ded

in fa

rm d

ams

duri

ng th

is in

vest

igat

ion.

As

per

D

ELW

P’s

habi

tat m

odel

Li

ssol

epis

co

vent

ryi

Swam

p Sk

ink

vu

L

2010

Occ

upie

s Sw

amp

Scru

b an

d sa

ltmar

sh c

omm

uniti

es p

artic

ular

ly

in n

ear-

coas

tal a

reas

acr

oss

sout

hern

Vic

tori

a. M

uch

of th

e si

te

supp

orts

sui

tabl

e ha

bita

t and

the

spec

ies

is k

now

n fr

om s

uch

habi

tats

clo

se to

the

site

. Th

e sp

ecie

s is

cer

tain

to o

ccur

with

in

the

site

.

Hig

h

Pseu

dem

oia

raw

linso

ni

Glo

ssy

Gra

ss

Skin

k

nt

20

00

Pr

imar

ily a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith d

amp

envi

ronm

ents

with

den

se

vege

tatio

n lik

e dr

aina

ge li

nes,

soa

ks a

nd th

e m

argi

ns o

f cre

eks.

H

abita

t inc

lude

s th

e fr

inge

s of

coa

stal

sal

tmar

shes

. M

uch

of

the

site

sup

port

s su

itabl

e ha

bita

t and

the

spec

ies

is k

now

n fr

om s

uch

habi

tats

clo

se to

the

site

. Th

e sp

ecie

s is

cer

tain

to

occu

r w

ithin

the

site

.

Hig

h

Vara

nus

variu

s La

ce M

onito

r

vu

19

73

O

ccur

s in

var

iety

of w

oode

d ha

bita

ts, i

nclu

ding

woo

dlan

ds.

Ther

e ar

e ve

ry fe

w r

ecor

ds o

f the

spe

cies

from

the

vici

nity

of

Wes

tern

Por

t.

As p

er

DEL

WP’

s ha

bita

t mod

el

© B

iosi

s 20

15 –

Lea

ders

in E

colo

gy a

nd H

erita

ge C

onsu

lting

D

raft

for d

iscu

ssio

n pu

rpos

es

83

Scie

ntif

ic

nam

e Co

mm

on

nam

e Co

nser

vati

on

stat

us

Mos

t re

cent

da

taba

se

reco

rd

Oth

er

reco

rds

Hab

itat

des

crip

tion

Li

kely

oc

curr

ence

in

Stu

dy A

rea

EPBC

St

ate

List

FF

G

Am

phib

ians

Lito

ria

rani

form

is

Gro

wlin

g G

rass

Fro

g VU

en

L

1999

PM

ST

Occ

upie

s a

vari

ety

of p

erm

anen

t and

sem

i-per

man

ent w

ater

bo

dies

gen

eral

ly c

onta

inin

g ab

unda

nt s

ubm

erge

d an

d em

erge

nt v

eget

atio

n (D

EWH

A 20

09b)

. Th

e sp

ecie

s w

as n

ot

dete

cted

by

the

pres

ent i

nves

tigat

ion.

The

re a

re v

ery

few

old

re

cord

s fr

om th

e lo

cal a

rea

and

the

spec

ies

is c

onsi

dere

d un

likel

y to

occ

ur a

t the

site

.

Low

Pseu

doph

ryne

se

mim

arm

orat

a So

uthe

rn

Toad

let

vu

2013

Occ

upie

s a

vari

ety

of h

abita

ts in

sou

th-e

aste

rn A

ustr

alia

, suc

h as

ope

n fo

rest

s, lo

wla

nd w

oodl

ands

and

hea

thla

nds

whe

re

adul

ts s

helte

r be

neat

h le

af li

tter

and

oth

er d

ebri

s in

moi

st

soak

s an

d de

pres

sion

s. M

uch

of th

e si

te s

uppo

rts

suita

ble

habi

tat a

nd th

e sp

ecie

s is

kno

wn

from

suc

h ha

bita

ts c

lose

to

the

site

. Th

e sp

ecie

s is

hig

hly

likel

y to

occ

ur w

ithin

the

site

.

As p

er

DEL

WP’

s ha

bita

t mod

el

Inve

rteb

rate

s

Sy

nem

on p

lana

G

olde

n Su

n M

oth

CR

cr

L -

PMST

Th

is d

iurn

al m

oth

inha

bits

nat

ive

and

som

e in

trod

uced

gr

assl

and

vege

tatio

n co

mm

uniti

es. T

here

are

no

reco

rds

of th

e sp

ecie

s fr

om M

orni

ngto

n Pe

nins

ula

or th

e vi

cini

ty o

f Wes

tern

Po

rt a

nd n

o su

itabl

e ha

bita

t occ

urs

at th

e si

te.

Neg

ligib

le

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 84

C.3 Migratory species (EPBC Act listed) Table C.3. Migratory fauna species recorded or predicted to occur within 5 km of the study area. N.B. species reliant on marine environments are not included in the present investigation.

Scientific Name Common Name Most recent record

Acrocephalus stentoreus Clamorous Reed Warbler 2013

Apus pacificus Fork-tailed Swift 1986

Bubulcus ibis Cattle Egret 2013

Hirundapus caudacutus White-throated Needletail 2013

Merops ornatus Rainbow Bee-eater 2011

Monarcha melanopsis Black-faced Monarch -

Myiagra cyanoleuca Satin Flycatcher 2013

Rhipidura rufifrons Rufous Fantail 2010

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 85

Appendix D. Photos

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 86

Appendix E. Ecology Glossary

Avoid

Avoiding removing any native vegetation when undertaking a use or development. This can be either by not permitting or not going ahead with the use or development, or locating it elsewhere so that removing native vegetation is not required.

Biodiversity

The variety of all life forms, the different plants, animals and microorganisms, the genes they contain, and the ecosystems of which they form a part.

Biodiversity Interactive Map (BIM)

Web based interactive map available on the DSE website that provides information on the biodiversity of Victoria and displays flora and fauna data from the Victorian Biodiversity Atlas.

Bioregion

Biogeographic areas that capture the patterns of ecological characteristics in the landscape or seascape, providing a natural framework for recognising and responding to biodiversity values. A landscape based approach to classifying the land surface using a range of environmental attributes such as climate, geomorphology, lithology and vegetation.

Canopy Tree

Is a mature tree greater than 3 m in height and is normally found in the upper layer of a vegetation type. Immature trees that are not yet able to flower and are less than three metres in height are considered part of the understorey (see definition of understorey).

Condition score

The score assigned to a habitat zone that indicates the quality of the vegetation relative to the ecological vegetation class benchmark, usually expressed as a percentage or on a scale of 0 to 1.

Ecological vegetation class (EVC)

A native vegetation type classified on the basis of a combination of its floristic, life form, environmental and ecological characteristics.

Forb

A herbaceous flowering plant that is not a graminoid (grass, sedge or rush).

General biodiversity equivalence score / units

Score or units used to quantify the relative overall contribution of a site to Victoria’s biodiversity.

General offset

An offset that is required when a proposal to remove native vegetation is not deemed, by application of the specific-general offset test, to have a significant impact on habitat for any rare or threatened species.

Habitat importance map

A map that indicates the importance of locations as habitat for a particular rare or threatened species. This map is based on modelled data.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 87

Habitat importance score

Measure of the importance of the habitat located on a site for a particular rare or threatened species.

Habitat zone

A discrete area of native vegetation consisting of a single vegetation type (EVC) within an assumed similar quality. This is the base spatial unit for conducting a Habitat hectare assessment. Separate Vegetation Quality Assessments (or Habitat hectare assessments) are conducted for each habitat zone within the designated assessment area.

Highly localised habitat

Habitat for rare or threatened species whose habitat is spread over a very restricted area (i.e. less than 2,000 ha). This can also be applied to a similarly limited sub-habitat that is disproportionately important for a wide-ranging rare or threatened species.

Incorporated document

A document that is included in the list of incorporated documents in a planning scheme. These documents affect the operation of the planning scheme.

Indigenous vegetation

The type of native vegetation that would have normally been expected to occur on the site prior to European settlement.

Landholder

An owner, occupier, proprietor or holder of land.

Landscape scale information

Mapped or modelled information based on data collected across the landscape rather than just on a particular site.

Listed species

A flora or fauna species listed under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Act 1999 or listed as threatened under the Victorian Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988.

Local Planning Policy Framework

Framework outlining a Municipal Strategic Statement and the Local Planning Policies that apply to the local government area.

Location risk

The risk that removing native vegetation in a particular location will have an impact on the persistence of a rare or threatened species.

Loss

Loss in the contribution to Victoria’s biodiversity when native vegetation is fully or partially removed, as measured in biodiversity equivalence scores or units.

Minimise

Locating, designing or managing a use or development to reduce the impacts on biodiversity from the removal of native vegetation.

Native (indigenous) vegetation

Native vegetation is plants that are indigenous to Victoria, including trees, shrubs, herbs and grasses (as defined in Clause 72 of the planning scheme).

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 88

Native vegetation extent

Area of land covered by native vegetation or the number of scattered trees.

Native Vegetation Information Management (NVIM) system

An online tool used to access information about Victoria's native vegetation.

No net loss

An outcome where a particular gain in the contribution to Victoria’s biodiversity is equivalent to an associated loss in the contribution to Victoria’s biodiversity from permitted clearing.

Offset

Protection and management (including revegetation) of native vegetation at a site to generate a gain in the contribution that native vegetation makes to Victoria’s biodiversity. An offset is used to compensate for the loss to Victoria’s biodiversity from the removal of native vegetation.

Offset Management Plan (OMP)

A document which sets out the requirements for establishment, protection and management of an offset site.

On-site offset

An offset located on the same property as the clearing.

Particular Provisions

Provisions in the Victoria Planning Provisions that relate to specific activities (for example, native vegetation is a Particular Provision).

Patch (see Remnant Patch)

Permit

A legal document that gives permission for a use or development on a particular piece of land.

Perennial

A plant that lives for more than two years. Perennials include species that are always visible e.g. shrubs and trees, but also include species that are not always visible above ground.

Permitted clearing

Removal of native vegetation for which a planning permit has been granted to remove native vegetation.

Permitted clearing regulations

The rules in the planning system that regulate permits for the removal of native vegetation.

Planning provisions – See Victoria Planning Provisions.

Planning scheme

Policies and provisions for the use, development and protection of land in a local government area.

Planning system

Victoria’s land-use planning system that includes the Victoria Planning Provisions and each local government’s planning scheme.

Protected species

A flora species protected under the Victorian Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 89

Rare or threatened species

A species that is listed in:

State Advisory List of Rare or Threatened Plants in Victoria as ‘endangered’, ‘vulnerable’, or ‘rare’, but does not include the ‘poorly known’ category

State Advisory List of Threatened Vertebrate Fauna in Victoria as ‘critically endangered’, ‘endangered’ or ‘vulnerable’, but does not include ‘near threatened’ or ‘data deficient’ categories

State Advisory List of Threatened Invertebrate Fauna in Victoria as ‘critically endangered’, ‘endangered’ or ‘vulnerable’, but does not include ‘near threatened’ or ‘data deficient’ categories.

Referral authority

An authority that a permit application is referred to for decision under Section 55 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. All referral requirements are specified in Clause 66 of planning schemes.

Remnant patch of native vegetation

Either:

an area of native vegetation , with or without trees, where at least 25 per cent of the total perennial understorey plant cover is native plants

an area with three or more indigenous canopy trees where the tree canopy cover is at least 20 per cent.

Remnant vegetation

Native vegetation that is established or has regenerated on a largely natural landform. The species present are those normally expected in that vegetation community. Largely natural landforms may have been subject to some past surface disturbance such as some clearing or cultivation (or even the activities of the nineteenth century gold rushes) but do not include man-made structures such as dam walls and quarry floors.

Responsible authority

The authority charged with the responsibility for administering and enforcing particular aspects of a planning scheme.

Scattered tree

An indigenous canopy tree that does not form part of a remnant patch of native vegetation (see definition of remnant patch of native vegetation).

sp.

Species (one species).

spp.

Species (more than one species).

spp. agg.

Species aggregate

Specific biodiversity equivalence score / units

With reference to a specific species, a score or units used to quantify the relative contribution of a site to Victoria’s biodiversity.

© Biosis 2015 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting Draft for discussion purposes 90

Specific offset

If the removal of native vegetation has a significant impact on habitat for a specific rare or threatened species, offsets must compensate for the removal of that particular species' habitat. This is referred to as a specific offset.

State Planning Policy Framework

A collection of clauses in the Victoria Planning Provisions that inform planning authorities and responsible authorities of those aspects of state planning policy which they are to take into account and give effect to in planning and administering their respective areas.

Strategic biodiversity map

A map that shows the relative value of a location in the landscape with regard to its condition, extent, connectivity and the support function it plays for species. The map is based on modelled data.

Strategic biodiversity score

A score that quantifies the relative value of a location in the landscape with regard to its condition, extent, connectivity and the support function it plays for species.

Taxon (plural taxa)

A term used to describe any taxonomic unit. This term is typically used when referring broadly to any scientifically recognised species, subspecies or variety.

Third-party offset

An offset located on a property owned by a person other than the landowner who incurs the native vegetation loss being offset.

Understorey

Understorey is all vegetation other than mature canopy trees – includes immature trees, shrubs, grasses, herbs, mosses, lichens and soil crust. It does not include dead plant material that is not attached to a living plant. More information on understorey life forms is set out in the Vegetation Quality Assessment Manual (DSE 2004).

Victoria Planning Provisions

A list of planning provisions that provides a standard template for individual planning schemes.

Zone

A zone in the Victoria Planning Provisions is a set of permitted uses of land which are defined spatially.