Port Jurisdiction Species at Risk Inventory · 1/5/2015 · species at risk occurrences/locations...

Port Jurisdiction – Species at Risk Inventory

Prepared for: Kim Keskinen Port Metro Vancouver 100 The Pointe, 999 Canada Place Vancouver, BC, V6C 3T4 Prepared by: Hemmera 18

th Floor, 4730 Kingsway

Burnaby, BC V5H 0C6 File: 302-046.01 January 2015

Hemmera Envirochem Inc.

18th

Floor, 4730 Kingsway

Burnaby, BC V5H 0C6

T: 604.669.0424

F: 604.669.0430

hemmera.com

January 5, 2015 File: 302-046.01 Port Metro Vancouver 100 The Pointe, 999 Canada Place Vancouver, BC V6C 3T4

Attn: Kim Keskinen, Environmental Specialist

Dear Kim,

Re: Port Jurisdiction – Species at Risk Inventory Draft Report

Hemmera is pleased to provide you with this finalized report.

Associated with this report, and a key component of the deliverable, are GIS shape files containing the

details of the species at risk inventory on PMV-jurisdiction lands summarised in the report. With this final

version of the report we will also provide you with the habitat classification GIS shape files and known

species at risk occurrences/locations for the PMV jurisdictional boundaries, these files have been joined

to the Species at Risk Inventory, so that it may be used as an interactive inventory tool.

We have appreciated the opportunity to work with you on this project and trust that this report meets your

requirements. Please feel free to contact the undersigned by phone or email regarding any questions or

further information that you may require.

Regards, Hemmera Envirochem Inc.

Charlie Palmer, P.Biol., R.P.Bio. Mikaela Davis, M.Sc. Practice Leader (EIA) Biologist 604.669.0424 (125) 604.669.0424 (236) [email protected] [email protected]

http://www.hemmera.com/

Port Metro Vancouver Hemmera Species at Risk Inventory - i - January 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1

2.0 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................... 2

3.0 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................ 7

4.0 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................. 13

5.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 15

6.0 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................... 16

List of Tables

Table 1 Habitat classification utilized for the species at risk inventory ............................................ 3

Table 2 SARA-listed species at risk with predicted presence (probable or possible) on PMV-

managed lands, within each subzone. ................................................................................ 8

Table 3 SARA-listed species at risk with predicted presence (probable or possible) on PMV-

lands, for which there are knowledge gaps relating to their management, and

recommendations for future Phase 2 management planning work. ................................... 9

Table 4 Conservation Data Centre masked occurrences on PMV-lands, by subzone .................. 10

Table 5 SARA-listed species at risk with predicted presence (probable or possible) on PMV-lands

recommended for future Phase 3 field work. .................................................................... 11

List of Figures

Figure 1 Map of PMV jurisdiction subzones used to refine the species at risk inventory ................. 6

List of Appendices

Appendix A Habitat Overview Maps

Appendix B Species at Risk Inventory Table

Port Metro Vancouver Hemmera Species at Risk Inventory - 1 - January 2015

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Port Metro Vancouver (PMV) is the manager of federally-owned properties within its proprietary

jurisdiction. Most of these properties are subject to development or day to day industrial activities – both

of which may affect the surrounding natural environment, including species at risk. This report is designed

to inform PMV decisions on such development and activities, specifically to meet federal Species at Risk

Act (SARA) and Canadian Environmental Assessment Act 2012 (CEAA 2012) obligations with respect to

federally-listed species at risk.

Species at risk are defined here as those formally designated as extirpated, endangered, threatened, or

of special concern in Appendices 1 through 3 of the SARA. Species at risk require special consideration

by federal land owners and decision-makers. Under the SARA, individuals, and in some cases the

habitat, of species at risk are legally protected on federal lands. This desktop inventory excludes the

identification of non-SARA identified species, and does not include the identification of ecosystems

(including wetlands) at risk. There are additional species at risk defined by other authorities and that

these species and / or plant communities may be present or potentially present on PMV-lands. While

currently excluded, the addition of provincially-identified and protected species is feasible, at a later date,

using the framework used here.

This desktop-based species at risk inventory includes federally-listed species present or potentially

present in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems within PMV jurisdiction. Three areas currently under PMV

jurisdiction were excluded: 1) areas in the north and middle arms of the Fraser River that will revert to the

Province of BC (the head lease), 2) Roberts Bank and Deltaport; and, 3) areas within PMV navigational

jurisdiction.

The desk-top inventory presented here represents phase 1 of a three-phase project. The purpose of this

report is to document species at risk that are vulnerable to PMV-related activities AND that have a

reasonable or high likelihood (possible or probable) to occur on PMV-lands. The report also prioritises the

species at risk for which future management planning (Phase 2) and future field inventory (Phase 3) are

recommended. These are the species for which there are identified knowledge gaps in distribution and/or

management planning pertaining to PMV-related activities.

In addition to this report we have developed an interactive GIS inventory tool for determining species at

risk that, based on a desk-top review of existing literature and other best available information, are known

to or likely to occur on PMV-managed lands.


2.0 METHODS

The results presented in Phase 1 are based on a desk-top investigation of SARA-listed species that are

likely or known (possible or probable) to occur on PMV-managed lands. We began with an inclusive list of

species at risk that may occur within PMV-jurisdiction. This list was refined, through species-specific

considerations, to develop sub-lists of species at risk for which there are identified knowledge gaps in

distribution and/or management planning pertaining to PMV-related activities.

To generate a comprehensive list of all species at risk listed under the SARA, the B.C Species and

Ecosystems Explorer database (B.C. Conservation Data Centre 2014) was queried for all schedule 1, 2

and 3 SARA-listed species. The B.C. Conservation Data Centre (CDC) is considered to contain the most

comprehensive database of species at risk occurrence records in BC; however, recent COSEWIC / SARA

registry changes may not be reflected in the CDC data. Some discrepancies between the SARA registry

and the CDC were noted, and in any such case the most-recent updated version was adopted for this

report. The results were then filtered to identify species with documented CDC occurrences in the

biogeoclimatic zones in PMV-managed lands, namely:

Coastal Western Hemlock (CWH)

Coastal Douglas Fir (CDF)

The list was then amended to include species added to SARA by a recent Emergency Listing Order

(Environment Canada 2014). Other data sources were also considered to inform assessments of

potential species occurrence including species noted in the South Coast Conservation Program (SCCP),

eFlora, eFauna, and existing data from previous environmental assessments conducted on PMV-lands

(ePIC and PMV Projects and Planning websites).

This initial assessment of species at risk presence considered species-specific habitat requirements.

Occurrence potential was refined in a GIS-based review that considered habitats present on PMV-lands.

The habitat types that occur on PMV-managed lands, and including a 250m buffer, were geo-spatially

mapped specifically for this work using existing habitat data, including open source ortho and satellite

based imagery, and augmented by a coarse terrestrial ecosystem map (TEM) developed by a TEM expert

with knowledge of the study area. Habitat types were classified and labelled based on a slight

modification of the Fraser River Estuary Management Program (FREMP) habitat classification categories

(i.e., where necessary, some habitat categories were added to the FREMP categories to provide

additional detail; Table 1). Polygons for each habitat type were delineated in ArcGIS software. The CDC

list of known habitat associations for species at risk was reconciled against recognized habitat

classifications for PMV-lands to further refine estimates of potential occurrence of each SARA-listed

species.


Table 1 Habitat classification utilized for the species at risk inventory

Habitat Category Source

Coniferous tree FREMP1

Cultivated field Hemmera TEM

Deciduous tree FREMP

Eelgrass FREMP

Low shrub FREMP

Macroalgae FREMP

Marsh FREMP

Meadow, vascular FREMP

Mixed tree FREMP

Mud FREMP

Open water Hemmera TEM

Riparian Forest Hemmera TEM

Riparian Herbaceous Hemmera TEM

Riparian Shrub Hemmera TEM

Rock FREMP

Sand FREMP

Tall shrub FREMP

Urban Hemmera TEM

1 FREMP – Fraser River Estuary Management Program

To ensure accuracy in the process, the PMV managed lands were divided into ten subzones; where

possible these divisions were the boundaries of a Biogeoclimatic Zone or Subzone (Figure 1). For each

of the subzones, a list of species with the potential to occur was generated from the species at risk

inventory. A species was recognized to potentially occur in the subzone if it contained habitats relevant

for that species and the species is known to occur in that Biogeoclimatic zone (based on CDC data).

Expert-based assessments of each subzone list were conducted by senior biologists with expertise in:

Terrestrial Wildlife (Jared Hobbs M.Sc., R.P.Bio), Terrestrial Vegetation (Caroline Astley, M.Sc., R.P.Bio.)

and Marine / Estuarine / Tidal-freshwater fish (Jim Roberts, B.Sc., R.P. Bio.). The senior biologists

estimated potential, or likelihood, to occur based on available literature, previous wildlife studies

conducted in the subzones, available provincial government data (e.g., CDC and / or e-Fauna BC – the

Electronic Atlas of the Fauna of BC) available environmental impact assessment documentation, and / or

personal knowledge of the species or subzone area from previous work. Connectivity to adjacent (known)

occurrences and / or adjacent potential habitat was also considered for each species as these conditions

are requisite to ensure viability of a species within an area. These considerations were facilitated by


review of open-source ortho and satellite imagery (Google and Micro-soft Bing). For each species listed

within each subzone, assessments included the following:

Characterizing the likelihood of species occurrence in the subzone using the following criteria:

▫ Probable (present if there is suitable habitat / micro-habitat, if there were any known

occurrence records (in or adjacent to the subzone) or if the species is adaptable and/or

tolerant of a wide range of conditions / disturbances),

▫ possible (not much is known of the species, or it is uncommon on the landscape),

▫ unlikely (the species is very uncommon on the landscape or because the required

microhabitat conditions are uncommon); or,

▫ not present.

Reporting known occurrences. The list of all species at risk with potential to occur in the subzone

(based on distribution and habitat association) was compared against known occurrence records

on or adjacent to PMV-lands.

Characterizing the state of knowledge for management actions to protect each species at risk

during PMV-related activities. Classified in three categories:

▫ Well known

▫ Not well known

Species that were determined to have a likelihood of occurring in the subzone (i.e. probable or possible

likelihood of occurrence) were then individually reviewed to determine if:

1. Current knowledge of management actions is likely adequate to protect or conserve the species

during implementation of PMV-related activities. Species at risk for which there are gaps in the

knowledge of management actions are recommended for Phase 2 work.

2. There is species presence knowledge on PMV-lands such that PMV-related activities can be

effectively managed. Species are recommended for field-based inventory work (Phase 3) if:

▫ There is known (i.e., identified) or potential critical habitat, as described in an existing federal

recovery strategy, that has implications for PMV management.

▫ Survey work associated with PMV-related projects or specific activities might not identify the

need to address these species because they persist in habitats deemed unusual for a

threatened species, e.g., industrial or agricultural habitat.

▫ There are known or predicted interactions with PMV-related activities. Knowledge of the

actual distribution of these species is required to reduce management uncertainties for PMV.

▫ The relatively defined habitat requirements for the species indicate any presence is likely vital

for the species, and survey work can be targeted to small areas of PMV-managed lands.


Once the expert-based assessment process was complete the lists for each subzone were appended

(joined) to the subzone habitat classification layers in ArcGIS. This process resulted in an interactive

spatial software tool that can be used by PMV for species at risk planning and management.

The B.C CDC (2014) was also queried to identify known element occurrence records (i.e., mapped known

locations) of species at risk that overlap the study area (including a 250m buffer zone). This information

was also added as a layer in ArcGIS. A number of sensitive occurrences of species at risk are input in the

B.C. CDC as ‘masked’ or buffered to protect them from public interference. We have applied to the B.C.

CDC to obtain access to these records.

PROJECT No.

December 2014

CLIENT:

302-046.01 FIGURE 1

OVERVIEW MAP

Pa

th:

O:\

!30

0-3

25

\30

2\0

46

\mxd\F

ig1

_3

02

_0

46_

Ove

rvie

wM

ap_

14

12

23.m

xd

Im

ag

ery

Sou

rce

: B

ING

Aeri

al Im

age

ry

PORT METRO VANCOUVERSPECIES AT RISK INVENTORY

A

C

J

J

J

JJJ

J

J

F

G

B

D

I

I

H

E

Legend

Project Sub Zone


3.0 RESULTS

This section summarizes the findings of the species at risk inventory, and identifies species

recommended for Phase 2 and Phase 3 of the project. Refer to Appendix B for more detailed information

on each species.

Thirty-two federally-listed species at risk were predicted as probably or possibly occurring on PMV-

managed lands (Table 2). Some (e.g., great blue heron (Ardea herodias fannini)), were predicted in all

subzones. Others were more-restricted in their distributions; for example, Oregon forestsnail (Allogona

townsendiana) was only predicted in two subzones. Most of the listed species predicted to be present are

well-known to PMV, and have been the subject of previous work, e.g., Pacific water shrew (Sorex bendirii)

and streambank lupine (Lupinus rivularis), while others, because of their recent listing or no PMV-related

activity in their habitats, are less-well-known to PMV, e.g., little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus), northern

rubber boa (Charina bottae) and marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus).

Of the 32 species with estimated probable or possible occurrence on PMV lands, six species were

identified as candidates for further management planning work in Phase 2 (i.e., knowledge of

management actions is likely not adequate to ensure effective conservation of these species in

association with PMV-related activities; Table 3). One of these species olive-sided flycatcher (Contopus

cooperi) is relatively common and widespread in forested habitats; by converse, another of these species,

red knot (Calidris canutus), is very uncommon and possibly only infrequently present on PMV-managed

lands. Both are likely unaffected by PMV-related activities and are therefore not recommended for Phase

2 management planning work. Three of the species recommended for future management planning work

are birds present in habitats not widely recognized as habitats for species at risk; common nighthawk

(Chordeiles minor), rusty blackbird (Euphagus carolinus) and the strigata subspecies of horned lark

(Eremophila alpestris strigata). The potential for PMV-related activities to affect them, and the required

management actions to conserve their presence is not known. White sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus)

is also recommended for management planning because there are unknown, but suspected, effects of

dredging activities on some life stages.

Sound management advice is readily available for the remaining 26 species that are not anticipated to

require further input regarding management planning. For these species, management guidance is

available from several sources (as listed for each species in Appendix B and on the interactive GIS

layers). Available advice includes documentation in federal and provincial recovery strategies,

management plans, and species accounts; future guidance may be provided upon request as required.


Table 2 SARA-listed species at risk with predicted presence (probable or possible) on PMV-managed lands, within each subzone.

Species / subzone (see figure 1) A B C D E F G H I J Total

band-tailed pigeon x x x x

4

barn owl

x x x x

x 5

coastal tailed frog x x

2

common nighthawk x x

x 3

deltoid balsamroot

x

1

Edith's checkerspot, taylori subsp. x x

x

3

great blue heron, fannini subsp. x x x x x x x x x x 10

green sturgeon

x x 2

horned lark, strigata subsp.

x

x 2

little brown myotis x x x x x x x

x 8

long-billed curlew

x

x 2

marbled murrelet x

1

monarch x x x x x x x x

x 8

Nooksack dace

x

1

northern goshawk, laingi subsp. x x

2

northern red-legged frog x x

x x x x x

7

northern rubber boa x x

2

olive-sided flycatcher x x x x

4

Oregon forestsnail

x x

2

Pacific water shrew x x

x

x x

5

painted turtle - Pacific coast popn. x

x

2

peregrine falcon, pealei subsp. x x x x x x x

x 8

Puget oregonian x x x x x x x

8

red knot

x 1

rusty blackbird x x x x x x x x

x 9

short-eared owl

x x x x

x 5

streambank lupine x x x

x x x x x

8

Townsend's mole

x x x x

4

Vancouver Island beggarticks x

x x x x x x x x 9

western screech-owl, kennicottii subsp. x x x x x x x

7

western toad x x x x

x 4

white sturgeon

x x x x x x x 7


Table 3 SARA-listed species at risk with predicted presence (probable or possible) on PMV-lands, for which there are knowledge gaps relating to their management, and recommendations for future Phase 2 management planning work.

Common Name Comment Management knowledge Management Planning

Recommended?

common nighthawk

Where suitable microsites exists. In coastal regions this species typically nests warm aspect hillsides featuring natural openings (e.g.,rock escarpments), artificial clearings (e.g., power-line ROW) and open forested areas.

B - Management Actions not known Yes

olive-sided flycatcher

Relatively widespread and often occurring in sub-optimal habitats such as artificial openings near forest edges. These areas may act as population sinks for the species with lower fecundity relative to more ideal habitats elsewhere.

B - Management Actions not known No

rusty blackbird

Locations in B,C,I,J suggest the species is likely to occur elsewhere on PMV-lands. The species has been documented to occur at many popular birding locations in Vancouver.


horned lark, strigata subspecies

A rare breeder in late-seral (mature/old-field) grassland habitats near major river estuaries. Known occurrence records exist adjacent to PMV-managed lands near Iona.


white sturgeon Known present in the Fraser River watershed, including the Pitt River sub-basin.


red knot Highest potential for occurrence suspected at Iona sewage plant. Anecdotal records exist.

B - Management Actions not known No


A search of the B.C. CDC for masked occurrences that intersect with the 250 m buffer around PMV lands

returned 21 mapped element occurrence records. The CDC applies a buffer, to indicate spatial

uncertainty in the mapping process, to all mapped element occurrences. More information has been

requested. When data are made available these results may be adjusted to reflect more accurate

information. In the interim; review of masked occurrence buffers indicate that nine of ten subzones have

at least one known (mapped) element occurrence (Table 4). Some of these occurrences may be for

species and plant communities that are provincially-listed species at risk, but are not included on the

federal SARA schedule 1, 2 or 3.

Table 4 Conservation Data Centre masked occurrences on PMV-lands, by subzone

Subzone Number of Masked Occurrences

A 3

B 3

C 4

D 2

E 2

F 1

G 3

H 1

I 0

J 2

Seven of the 32 federally-listed species at risk with probable or possible occurrence on PMV-lands are

recommended for future field inventory in Phase 3 of this project (Table 5). These species share all or

some of the following characteristics, which provide rationale for field inventory to inform PMV

management:

There is or could be identified critical habitat in a federal recovery strategy that has implications

for PMV management (e.g., Pacific water shrew).

Survey work associated with PMV-related projects or specific activities might fail to accurately

identify or recognize the need to address these species because they persist in habitats unusual

for a threatened species, e.g., barn owl (Tyto alba), little brown myotis, streambank lupine.

There are known or predicted interactions with PMV-related activities, e.g., barn owl, little brown

myotis, streambank lupine, painted turtle (Chrysemys picta), nooksack dace (Rhinichthys

cataractae), northern red-legged frog (Rana aurora), and Pacific water shrew. Accurate

knowledge of the current extent, abundance and distribution of these species will reduce

management uncertainty for PMV.

The relatively restrictive habitat requirements, reduced habitat availability and / or restricted

distribution for the species in BC suggest that all extant occurrences are likely vital for species

recovery or persistence within its current range in BC. For these species field inventory can be

focused on relatively smaller areas of PMV-managed lands where appropriate habitats may exist.


Table 5 SARA-listed species at risk with predicted presence (probable or possible) on PMV-lands recommended for future Phase 3 field work.

English Name Field work recommended? Rationale for field-based survey recommendation

barn owl Yes Likely nesting / roosting on PMV properties, including industrial sites. Forages on PMV property, impacts / interactions likely. Survey in areas with suitable habitat features.

little brown myotis Yes Recently listed on the SARA. Little information available regarding the species distribution and habitats in the Lower Mainland. Roost/hibernation sites likely to occur on PMV properties. Impacts / interactions possible. Survey for key habitat features (hibernacula).

nooksack dace Yes A survey in suitable habitat on land with PMV-related impacts would add clarity regarding distribution (presence / absence).

northern red-legged frog Yes A widespread and relatively common wetland / forest generalist. Known close to PMV properties, and possible interactions. Wide-area survey techniques to establish presence are well-developed.

Pacific water shrew Yes Uncommon aquatic habitat generalists (or little known about habitat use). Survey in areas where presence is predicted AND PMV-related developments might occur. New Recovery Strategy with critical habitat identified.

painted turtle - Pacific coast popn. Yes Survey in suitable microsites in areas where presence is predicted AND PMV-related developments might occur. Likely limited distribution; surveys will assist in determining the likely risk posed by PMV-activities.

streambank lupine Yes Habitat limited and uncommon. Conduct surveys in suitable habitats in areas with predicted presence where there is potential for PMV-related impacts. Presence of threatened species may not be suspected in areas of mobile gravel where streambank lupine can be found.

band-tailed pigeon No A relatively widespread and motile species. Where PMV-related impacts are anticipated to occur within mature coniferous habitat surveys will be triggered by PMV approval processes.

coastal tailed frog No A widespread and relatively common riverine and riparian species. Little PMV development anticipated in high-value habitats, but surveys will be triggered by PMV approval processes.

common nighthawk No Nesting habitat was estimated as restricted. A highly motile migratory species. Where PMV-related impacts are anticipated within potential nesting habitats project-specific surveys will be triggered by PMV approval processes.

deltoid balsamroot No Outside area of concentrated presence (Van Is). Assume presence in subzone F in suitable habitat. Project-specific surveys will be triggered by PMV approval processes.

Edith's checkerspot, taylori subsp. No Likely present in limited locations, where PMV-related projects are anticipated to be unlikely. For PMV-related projects in areas A, B, D surveys will be triggered by PMV approval processes.

great blue heron, fannini subsp. No A widespread and common habitat generalist. Conspicuous during nesting and foraging. Surveys for breeding occurrences will be triggered by PMV approval processes.

green sturgeon No Could be a miss-identification of white sturgeon. No breeding records. A marine species that occasionally enters estuaries. V. rare or absent and likely few PMV-related impacts.

horned lark, strigata subspecies No Restricted habitat requirements, limited occurrence records, likely an infrequent / vagrant visitor, presence is usually indicated through birding community list-serves. Project-specific surveys will be triggered by PMV approval processes.

long-billed curlew No Restricted habitat requirements in areas with other values. PMV-related projects with impacts will trigger surveys that will assess occurrence status for this species at the site level.

marbled murrelet No Unless PMV-related developments are proposed within limited areas of potential nesting habitats no wide-area (modelling and aerial) surveys are recommended. PMV-related projects with impacts will trigger surveys that will assess for this species.

monarch No Unlikely except as a transient and only then if host plants are present. Surveys (for host plants) triggered by PMV-related projects in areas of likely presence.

northern goshawk, laingi subsp. No Widespread but uncommon; species is also cryptic during breeding. Surveys triggered by PMV approval processes.

northern rubber boa No Presence predicted only where there is little PMV-related development anticipated at this time. Surveys will be triggered by PMV approval processes.

olive-sided flycatcher No Widespread and relatively common in western Canada. A highly motile migratory species with generalist habitat use. Surveys will be triggered by PMV approval processes.

Oregon forestsnail No Restricted distributions in broadleaf forest habitats. Project-specific surveys in key habitat for the species will be triggered by PMV approval processes.

peregrine falcon, pealei subsp. No Widespread but uncommon. It is likely that all extant nesting sites are currently known except in more remote areas of subzone A and B. Project-specific surveys in key habitat for the species will be triggered by PMV approval processes.

Puget oregonian No Restricted distributions in broadleaf forest habitats. Project-specific surveys in key habitat for the species will be triggered by PMV approval processes.

red knot No A highly mobile and migratory species. Project-specific surveys in key habitat for the species will be triggered by PMV approval processes.

rusty blackbird No Widespread and relatively common. A highly mobile and migratory species. Project-specific surveys in key habitat for the species will be triggered by PMV approval processes

short-eared owl No A relatively common and conspicuous species. Project-specific surveys in key habitat for the species will be triggered by PMV approval processes.

Townsend's mole No Restricted distributions in late seral grassy habitats in the upper Fraser Valley - likely outside immediate areas of anticipated PMV activity. Surveys in key habitat for the species will be triggered by PMV approval processes.

Vancouver Island beggarticks No Likely quite widespread. From CDC: "frequent in wetlands in the lower Fraser Delta...occupies a variety of wetland habitats including ditches, willow wetlands, … pond margins, streamsides, and tidal or non-tidal river edges". Surveys in key habitat for the species will be triggered by PMV approval processes.

western screech-owl, kennicottii subsp.

No Probably relatively widespread near PMV properties, but not likely to occur on PMV-lands except within forested areas. Typically prefers mixed-wood riparian habitats. Project-specific surveys in areas with predicted presence AND suitable habitat will be triggered by PMV approval processes.

Western toad No A widespread and common wetland / forest generalist. Some PMV development anticipated within suitable habitats; surveys will be triggered by PMV approval processes for projects.

White sturgeon No Assume present in most areas, and apply caution during PMV-related activities due to lack of management knowledge (unknown impacts due to dredging activity).


More defined work-planning for the Phase 3 field inventory could be completed upon request. This work

would appropriately incorporate species-specific considerations to refine focus to areas where important

habitat characteristics may occur on PMV-managed lands. This step is required to ensure inventory

efforts are focused on areas where each species is estimated to have the highest likelihood of

occurrence.

Twenty-five species identified to have Possible or Probable likelihood to occur are not currently

recommended for inventory work during Phase 3. These species share characteristics that do not

suggest field-based inventory will be required; based on current assumptions regarding species habitat

selection criteria and based on assumptions regarding anticipated development activities on PMV-lands.

Characteristics used to exclude species from further consideration (at this time) include:

Species that are regarded as highly mobile or wide-ranging with foraging or migratory

movements. Although these species may temporarily use some habitats on PMV lands the

documented presence of these species on PMV lands is not critical for specific life-requisite

stages (e.g., breeding, hibernation). If the species’ use of habitat attributes on PMV-lands is

exceptional or likely vital to the species recovery or viability in BC and critical habitat is likely to

occur the recommendation to survey needs to be reconsidered. Examples of these species may

include: monarch (Danaus plexippus), rusty blackbird, peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus pealei),

band-tailed pigeon (Patagioenas fasciata), great blue heron, Vancouver Island beggarticks

(Bidens amplissima) and deltoid balsamroot (Balsamorhiza deltoidea),

Species with no current interaction with PMV operational activities. These species are typically

highly specialized and occur only locally. Examples of these species may include: Townsend’s mole (Scapanus townsendii), northern rubber boa, marbled murrelet, coastal tailed-frog

(Ascaphus truei), Edith’s checkerspot (Euphydryas editha taylori), horned lark.

Species at risk more-likely to trigger surveys as part of PMV-approval processes to determine

presence when their habitats are affected. Examples of these species may include: Western

screech-owl (Megascops kennicottii kennicottii), red knot, Puget oregonian (Cryptomastix devia),

Oregon forestsnail, northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis laingi), western toad (Anaxyrus boreas),

etc.

Species that are conspicuous and unlikely to be overlooked. Examples of these species may

include: short-eared owl (Asio flammeus), great blue heron, long-billed curlew (Numenius

americanus), olive-sided flycatcher, rusty blackbird, etc.


4.0 CONCLUSIONS

This report has documented a large number of federally species at risk that are present or were estimated

to have high potential to occur on PMV-managed lands. Of the 32 species identified, a smaller number

have identified knowledge gaps which may hinder effective management in relation to PMV activities

(six species). Seven species have also been recommended for field-based inventory work as a

component of future project phases. Future management planning work or field survey for these species

is recommended in Phases 2 and 3 of this project to inform PMV in management decision making

processes. Particular consideration is afforded to species that have the greatest chance of being affected

by PMV-related activities, and for species that may be overlooked during PMV approval processes.

There are some assumptions associated with this work, the knowledge of which is essential for

understanding the results and recommendations. Identification of species at risk on PMV-managed lands,

with the exception of known occurrences, is based on desktop work; the key part of which was relatively

coarse-scale habitat mapping. The design of this work lends itself to future updates to refine habitat

mapping predictions, and hence improve the resolution and accuracy of species at risk identification on

PMV-lands assessed in this report. Future refinement to habitat mapping or occurrence estimates could

be undertaken on a wide-area scale to include all areas of PMV jurisdiction, or on a site-by-site basis. The

interactive GIS layer output associated with this report lends itself to an efficient update process. There is

also a requirement for the species inventory to be updated from time to time with new information, as

SARA listing status for species at risk evolve.

The focus of this work is federally listed species at risk on schedules 1, 2 and 3 of the SARA. As such it

omits some species at risk that the Province of BC has identified as a management concern (i.e., red-

listed by the CDC). Two species that may be present on PMV-lands and might be affected by PMV-

related activities, but are not listed by the SARA are snowshoe hare washingtonii subspecies (Lepus

americanus washingtonii) and southern red-backed vole occidentalis subspecies (Myodes gapperi

occidentalis).


This report prioritises and, in conjunction with the associated GIS data layers, documents federally-listed

species at risk predicted or known to be present on PMV-lands. In association with existing approval

processes this tool can be used to inform PMV decisions for activities and projects that might affect

species at risk. It will aid PMV in meeting its obligations to requirements stipulated under the federal

Species at Risk Act and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act 2012 with respect to federally-

listed species at risk.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned by phone at 604.669.0424.

Report prepared by: Hemmera Envirochem Inc.

Mikaela Davis, M.Sc. Charlie Palmer, M.Sc., P.Biol., R.P.Bio. Biologist Practice Leader (EIA Peer Review by: Hemmera Envirochem Inc.

Jared Hobbs, M.Sc., R.P.Bio. Senior Biologist


5.0 REFERENCES

B.C. Conservation Data Centre. CDC. 2014. B.C. Species and Ecosystems Explorer. B.C. Ministry of

Environment. Victoria, B.C. Accessed (December 2014) from: http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/eswp/.

Environment Canada. 2014. Factsheet on the Emergency Listing Order for the Little Brown Myotis, the

Northern Myotis and the Tri-colored Bat. Accessed (18 December 2014) from:

http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/document/default_e.cfm?documentID=1372.

http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/eswp/


6.0 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS

This report was prepared by Hemmera Envirochem Inc. (“Hemmera”), based on work conducted for the

sole benefit and exclusive use of Port Metro Vancouver. The material in it reflects Hemmera’s best

judgment in light of the information available to it at the time of preparing this report. Any use that a third

party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decision made based on it, is the responsibility of such

third parties. Hemmera accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a

result of decisions made or actions taken based on this report.

Hemmera has performed the work as described above and made the findings and conclusions set out in

this report in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill normally exercised by members of the

environmental science profession practicing under similar conditions at the time the work was performed.

This report represents a reasonable review of the information available to Hemmera within the

established scope, work schedule and budgetary constraints. No warranty, expressed or implied, is given

concerning the presence of threatened species at a site. The conclusions and recommendations

contained in this report are based upon applicable legislation existing at the time of drafting. Any changes

in the legislation may alter the conclusions and/or recommendations contained in the report. Regulatory

implications discussed in this report were based on the applicable legislation existing at the time this

report was written.

In preparing this report, Hemmera has relied in good faith on information provided by others as noted,

and has assumed that the information provided by those individuals is both factual and accurate.

Hemmera accepts no responsibility for any deficiency, misstatement or inaccuracy in this report resulting

from the information provided by those individuals.

The liability of Hemmera to Port Metro Vancouver shall be limited to injury or loss caused by the negligent

acts of Hemmera. The total aggregate liability of Hemmera related to this agreement shall not exceed the

lesser of the actual damages incurred, or the total fee of Hemmera for services rendered on this project.

APPENDIX A

Habitat Overview Maps

Pa

th:

O:\

!30

0-3

25

\30

2\0

46

\mxd\F

ig0

1_

30

2_

046

_In

ve

nto

ry_

Ma

pb

oo

k_

141

22

2.m

xd

1:63,000

0 1 2 3

Kilometres

SOURCES

Habitat Classification

Cliff

Coniferous tree

Cultivated field

Deciduous tree

Low shrub

Marsh

Meadow, vascular

Mixed forest

Mixed tree

Mud

Open water

Riparian deciduous

Riparian forest

Riparian herbaceous

Riparian shrub

Rock

Sand

Tall shrub

Urban

Biogeoclimatic Zone Boundary

Site Boundary

Project Sub Zone Boundary

Site Boundary Buffer (250m)

CW

H v

m 1

:

Co

as

tal

We

ste

rn

He

mlo

ck

- V

ery

We

t M

ari

t im

e

CW H dm :

Coastal W estern Hem lock

- Dry M arit im e

CW

H v

m 1

:

Co

as

tal

We

ste

rn

He

mlo

ck

- V

ery

We

t M

arit

ime

CW

H v

m 1

:

Co

as

tal

We

ste

rn

He

mlo

ck

- V

ery

We

t M

arit

ime

Subzone A

Subzone B


SUB ZONE A HABITAT OVERVIEW

302-046 Production Date:

12/17/2014

Legend

Figure 1A

Richmond

DeltaSurrey

Vancouver

Burnaby

Langley

Coquitlam

PittMeadows

Strait of Georgia

NorthVancouver

West

Vancouver

BC

G

A

I

HF

D

E

J

0 5 10 15 20

Kilometres

1. Bioclimatic Zone boundaries obtained from Ministry ofForests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations.2. Basemap copyright ESRI and it's data suppliers.

Pa

th:

O:\

!30

0-3

25

\30

2\0

46

\mxd\F

ig0

1_

30

2_

046

_In

ve

nto

ry_

Ma

pb

oo

k_

141

22

2.m

xd

1:44,000

0 1 2

Kilometres

SOURCES


Cliff

Coniferous tree

Cultivated field

Deciduous tree

Low shrub

Marsh

Meadow, vascular

Mixed forest

Mixed tree

Mud

Open water

Riparian deciduous

Riparian forest

Riparian herbaceous

Riparian shrub

Rock

Sand

Tall shrub

Urban


Site Boundary



CW H vm 2 :


- Very W et Marit im e

CW

H v

m 2

:

Co

as

tal

We

ste

rn

He

mlo

ck

- V

ery

We

t M

arit

ime

CW H dm :


- Dry M arit im e

CW H vm 1 :


- Very W et Marit im e

Subzone A

Subzone C

Subzone B


SUB ZONE B HABITAT OVERVIEW


12/17/2014

Legend

Figure 1B

Richmond

DeltaSurrey

Vancouver

Burnaby

Langley

Coquitlam

PittMeadows

Strait of Georgia

NorthVancouver

West

Vancouver

BC

G

A

I

HF

D

E

J

0 5 10 15 20

Kilometres


Pa

th:

O:\

!30

0-3

25

\30

2\0

46

\mxd\F

ig0

1_

30

2_

046

_In

ve

nto

ry_

Ma

pb

oo

k_

141

22

2.m

xd

1:48,000

0 1 2

Kilometres

SOURCES


Cliff

Coniferous tree

Cultivated field

Deciduous tree

Low shrub

Marsh

Meadow, vascular

Mixed forest

Mixed tree

Mud

Open water

Riparian deciduous

Riparian forest

Riparian herbaceous

Riparian shrub

Rock

Sand

Tall shrub

Urban


Site Boundary



CW H dm :


- Dry M arit im e

CW

H x

m 1

:

Co

as

tal

We

ste

rn

He

mlo

ck

- V

ery

Dry

Ma

rit

ime

Subzone C

Subzone J

Subzone B


SUB ZONE C HABITAT OVERVIEW


12/17/2014

Legend

Figure 1C

Richmond

DeltaSurrey

Vancouver

Burnaby

Langley

Coquitlam

PittMeadows

Strait of Georgia

NorthVancouver

West

Vancouver

BC

G

A

I

HF

D

E

J

0 5 10 15 20

Kilometres


Pa

th:

O:\

!30

0-3

25

\30

2\0

46

\mxd\F

ig0

1_

30

2_

046

_In

ve

nto

ry_

Ma

pb

oo

k_

141

22

2.m

xd

1:36,000

0 1 2

Kilometres

SOURCES


Cliff

Coniferous tree

Cultivated field

Deciduous tree

Low shrub

Marsh

Meadow, vascular

Mixed forest

Mixed tree

Mud

Open water

Riparian deciduous

Riparian forest

Riparian herbaceous

Riparian shrub

Rock

Sand

Tall shrub

Urban


Site Boundary



CW

H v

m 2

:

Co

as

tal

We

ste

rn

He

mlo

ck

- V

ery

We

t M

arit

ime

CW H dm :


- Dry M arit im e

CW

H v

m 2

:

Co

as

tal

We

ste

rn

He

mlo

ck

- V

ery

We

t M

arit

ime

Subzone D

Subzone E


SUB ZONE D HABITAT OVERVIEW


12/17/2014

Legend

Figure 1D

Richmond

DeltaSurrey

Vancouver

Burnaby

Langley

Coquitlam

PittMeadows

Strait of Georgia

NorthVancouver

West

Vancouver

BC

G

A

I

HF

D

E

J

0 5 10 15 20

Kilometres


Pa

th:

O:\

!30

0-3

25

\30

2\0

46

\mxd\F

ig0

1_

30

2_

046

_In

ve

nto

ry_

Ma

pb

oo

k_

141

22

2.m

xd

1:37,000

0 1 2

Kilometres

SOURCES


Cliff

Coniferous tree

Cultivated field

Deciduous tree

Low shrub

Marsh

Meadow, vascular

Mixed forest

Mixed tree

Mud

Open water

Riparian deciduous

Riparian forest

Riparian herbaceous

Riparian shrub

Rock

Sand

Tall shrub

Urban


Site Boundary



CW H dm :


- Dry M arit im e

Subzone G

Subzone D

Subzone E


SUB ZONE E HABITAT OVERVIEW


12/17/2014

Legend

Figure 1E

Richmond

DeltaSurrey

Vancouver

Burnaby

Langley

Coquitlam

PittMeadows

Strait of Georgia

NorthVancouver

West

Vancouver

BC

G

A

I

HF

D

E

J

0 5 10 15 20

Kilometres


Pa

th:

O:\

!30

0-3

25

\30

2\0

46

\mxd\F

ig0

1_

30

2_

046

_In

ve

nto

ry_

Ma

pb

oo

k_

141

22

2.m

xd

1:46,000

0 1 2

Kilometres

SOURCES


Cliff

Coniferous tree

Cultivated field

Deciduous tree

Low shrub

Marsh

Meadow, vascular

Mixed forest

Mixed tree

Mud

Open water

Riparian deciduous

Riparian forest

Riparian herbaceous

Riparian shrub

Rock

Sand

Tall shrub

Urban


Site Boundary



CW H dm :


- Dry M arit im e

CW H xm 1 :


- Very Dry M ar it im e

Subzone F

Subzone G

Subzone G

Subzone E


SUB ZONE F HABITAT OVERVIEW


12/17/2014

Legend

Figure 1F

Richmond

DeltaSurrey

Vancouver

Burnaby

Langley

Coquitlam

PittMeadows

Strait of Georgia

NorthVancouver

West

Vancouver

BC

G

A

I

HF

D

E

J

0 5 10 15 20

Kilometres


Pa

th:

O:\

!30

0-3

25

\30

2\0

46

\mxd\F

ig0

1_

30

2_

046

_In

ve

nto

ry_

Ma

pb

oo

k_

141

22

2.m

xd

1:60,000

0 1 2 3

Kilometres

SOURCES


Cliff

Coniferous tree

Cultivated field

Deciduous tree

Low shrub

Marsh

Meadow, vascular

Mixed forest

Mixed tree

Mud

Open water

Riparian deciduous

Riparian forest

Riparian herbaceous

Riparian shrub

Rock

Sand

Tall shrub

Urban


Site Boundary



CW H dm :


- Dry M arit im e

CW H xm 1 :



Subzone F

Subzone F

Subzone G

Subzone B

Subzone B

Subzone B

Subzone B

Subzone I

Subzone H

Subzone E


SUB ZONE G HABITAT OVERVIEW


12/17/2014

Legend

Figure 1G

Richmond

DeltaSurrey

Vancouver

Burnaby

Langley

Coquitlam

PittMeadows

Strait of Georgia

NorthVancouver

West

Vancouver

BC

G

A

I

HF

D

E

J

0 5 10 15 20

Kilometres


Pa

th:

O:\

!30

0-3

25

\30

2\0

46

\mxd\F

ig0

1_

30

2_

046

_In

ve

nto

ry_

Ma

pb

oo

k_

141

22

2.m

xd

1:29,000

0 1

Kilometres

SOURCES


Cliff

Coniferous tree

Cultivated field

Deciduous tree

Low shrub

Marsh

Meadow, vascular

Mixed forest

Mixed tree

Mud

Open water

Riparian deciduous

Riparian forest

Riparian herbaceous

Riparian shrub

Rock

Sand

Tall shrub

Urban


Site Boundary



CDF m m :

Coastal Douglas- f ir

- M oist M arit im e

CW H dm :


- Dry M arit im e

CW H xm 1 :



Subzone G

Subzone I

Subzone H


SUB ZONE H HABITAT OVERVIEW


12/17/2014

Legend

Figure 1H

Richmond

DeltaSurrey

Vancouver

Burnaby

Langley

Coquitlam

PittMeadows

Strait of Georgia

NorthVancouver

West

Vancouver

BC

G

A

I

HF

D

E

J

0 5 10 15 20

Kilometres


Pa

th:

O:\

!30

0-3

25

\30

2\0

46

\mxd\F

ig0

1_

30

2_

046

_In

ve

nto

ry_

Ma

pb

oo

k_

141

22

2.m

xd

1:44,000

0 1 2

Kilometres

SOURCES


Cliff

Coniferous tree

Cultivated field

Deciduous tree

Low shrub

Marsh

Meadow, vascular

Mixed forest

Mixed tree

Mud

Open water

Riparian deciduous

Riparian forest

Riparian herbaceous

Riparian shrub

Rock

Sand

Tall shrub

Urban


Site Boundary



Deas Slough

CDF m m :



CW H xm 1 :



Subzone J

Subzone J

Subzone J

Subzone I

Subzone I

Subzone H


SUB ZONE I HABITAT OVERVIEW


12/17/2014

Legend

Figure 1I

Richmond

DeltaSurrey

Vancouver

Burnaby

Langley

Coquitlam

PittMeadows

Strait of Georgia

NorthVancouver

West

Vancouver

BC

G

A

I

HF

D

E

J

0 5 10 15 20

Kilometres


Pa

th:

O:\

!30

0-3

25

\30

2\0

46

\mxd\F

ig0

1_

30

2_

046

_In

ve

nto

ry_

Ma

pb

oo

k_

141

22

2.m

xd

1:77,000

0 1 2 3 4

Kilometres

SOURCES


Cliff

Coniferous tree

Cultivated field

Deciduous tree

Low shrub

Marsh

Meadow, vascular

Mixed forest

Mixed tree

Mud

Open water

Riparian deciduous

Riparian forest

Riparian herbaceous

Riparian shrub

Rock

Sand

Tall shrub

Urban


Site Boundary



CDF m m :



CW H dm :


- Dry M arit im e

CWH xm

1 :

Coastal Western Hem

lock

- Very Dry Mar it ime

Subzone C

Subzone J

Subzone J

Subzone J

Subzone J

Subzone J

Subzone J

Subzone J

Subzone J

Subzone I

Subzone HPORT METRO VANCOUVER

SPECIES AT RISK INVENTORY

SUB ZONE J HABITAT OVERVIEW


12/17/2014

Legend

Figure 1J

Richmond

DeltaSurrey

Vancouver

Burnaby

Langley

Coquitlam

PittMeadows

Strait of Georgia

NorthVancouver

West

Vancouver

BC

G

A

I

HF

D

E

J

0 5 10 15 20

Kilometres


APPENDIX B

Species at Risk Inventory Table

Port Metro Vancouver APPENDIX B Hemmera Species at Risk Inventory - 1 - January 2015

Note: The Master species at risk inventory has been annotated to fit within the report. As such, many of

the fields (such as habitat type, Management Document, rationales, etc) are not present in this version of

the table, but will be included in the GIS files delivered with the final report.

SubZoneA

English Name SARA Likely OccurrenceKnown

OccurrenceState of Management

Management

Planning

Recommended?

Fieldwork

Recommended?

Band-tailed Pigeon 1-SC (Feb 2011) A - Probable 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Coastal Tailed Frog 1-SC (Jun 2003) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Common Nighthawk 1-T (Feb 2010) A - Probable 2 - No B - Management Actions not known YES NO

Edith's Checkerspot, taylori subspecies 1-E (Jun 2003) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Great Blue Heron, fannini subspecies 1-SC (Feb 2010) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Little Brown Myotis 1-E A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES

Marbled Murrelet 1-T (Jun 2003) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Northern Goshawk, laingi subspecies 1-T (Jun 2003) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Northern Rubber Boa 1-SC (Jan 2005) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Olive-sided Flycatcher 1-T (Feb 2010) A - Probable 2 - No B - Management Actions not known NO NO

Pacific Water Shrew 1-E (Jun 2003) A - Probable 1 - Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES

Painted Turtle - Pacific Coast Population 1-E (Dec 2007) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES

Rusty Blackbird 1-SC (Mar 2009) A - Probable 1- Yes B - Management Actions not known YES NO

Western Screech-Owl, kennicottii subspecies 1-SC (Jan 2005) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Western Toad 1-SC (Jan 2005) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Monarch 1-SC (Jun 2003) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Northern Red-legged Frog 1-SC (Jan 2005) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES

Peregrine Falcon, pealei subspecies 1-SC (Jun 2003) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Puget Oregonian 1-X (Jan 2005) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

streambank lupine 1-E (Jan 2005) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES

Vancouver Island beggarticks 1-SC (Jun 2003) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Ancient Murrelet 1-SC (Aug 2006) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Barn Owl 1-SC (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

bog bird's-foot lotus 1-E (Jul 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

deltoid balsamroot 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Gray's desert-parsley 1-T (Feb 2011) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Green Sturgeon 1-SC (Aug 2006) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Horned Lark, strigata subspecies 1-E (Jul 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Large Marble, insulanus subspecies 1-X (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Lewis's Woodpecker 1-T (Jul 2012) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Lewis's Woodpecker (Georgia Depression population) 1-T (Jul 2012) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Macoun's meadow-foam 1-T (Aug 2006) c - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Oregon Forestsnail 1-E (Jan 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Oregon Spotted Frog 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

phantom orchid 1-T (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

prairie lupine 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

purple sanicle 1-T (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Red Knot 1-T/E (Feb 2010) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Sharp-tailed Snake 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Short-eared Owl 1-SC (Jul 2012) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Spotted Owl 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Steller Sea Lion 1-SC (Jul 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Threaded Vertigo 1-SC (Jul 2012) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Townsend's Mole 1-E (Jan 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

white meconella 1-E (Aug 2006) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

whitebark pine 1-E (Jul 2012) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

white-top aster 1-SC (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

yellow montane violet 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Blue-grey Taildropper 1-E (Dec 2007) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Burrowing Owl 1-E (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Canada Warbler 1-T (Feb 2010) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Coastal Giant Salamander 1-T (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Dromedary Jumping-slug 1-T (Jan 2005) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Ermine, haidarum subspecies 1-T (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Gopher Snake, catenifer subspecies 1-X (Jan 2005) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Greenish Blue, insulanus subspecies 1-E (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Leatherback 1-E (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Long-billed Curlew 1-SC (Jan 2005) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Northern Saw-whet Owl, brooksi subspecies 1-T (Dec 2007) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Peregrine Falcon, anatum subspecies 1-SC (Jun 2012) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Sage Thrasher 1-E (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Vesper Sparrow, affinis subspecies 1-E (Dec 2007) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Warty Jumping-slug 1-SC (Jan 2005) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Western Pond Turtle 1-X (Jan 2005) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

White Sturgeon 1-E (Aug 2006) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Yellow-breasted Chat 1-E (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Port Metro Vancouver

Port Jurisdiction – Species at Risk Inventory Page 1 of 10

Hemmera

File: 302-046.01

January 2015

SubZoneB

English Name SARA Likely Occurrence Known Occurrence State of Management

Management

Planning

Recommended?

Fieldwork

Recommended?

Band-tailed Pigeon 1-SC (Feb 2011) A - Probable 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Coastal Tailed Frog 1-SC (Jun 2003) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Edith's Checkerspot, taylor 1-E (Jun 2003) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Great Blue Heron, fannini s1-SC (Feb 2010) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO


Northern Goshawk, laingi s1-T (Jun 2003) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Northern Red-legged Frog 1-SC (Jan 2005) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES

Northern Rubber Boa 1-SC (Jan 2005) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO



Peregrine Falcon, pealei su1-SC (Jun 2003) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO


Western Screech-Owl, ken 1-SC (Jan 2005) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO


Common Nighthawk 1-T (Feb 2010) B - Possible 2 - No B - Management Actions not known YES NO



streambank lupine 1-E (Jan 2005) B - Possible 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES






Horned Lark, strigata subsp1-E (Jul 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Large Marble, insulanus su1-X (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Lewis's Woodpecker 1-T (Jul 2012) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Lewis's Woodpecker (Geor1-T (Jul 2012) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Macoun's meadow-foam 1-T (Aug 2006) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Marbled Murrelet 1-T (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable


Painted Turtle - Pacific Coa1-E (Dec 2007) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable


pink sand-verbena 1-E (Jul 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable



Sharp-tailed Snake 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable


Spotted Owl 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable


Townsend's Mole 1-E (Jan 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Vancouver Island beggartic1-SC (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable










Ermine, haidarum subspec 1-T (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Greenish Blue, insulanus s 1-E (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable


Northern Saw-whet Owl, br1-T (Dec 2007) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Peregrine Falcon, anatum s1-SC (Jun 2012) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Vesper Sparrow, affinis sub1-E (Dec 2007) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable





Hemmera

File: 302-046.01

January 2015

SubZoneC


Management

Planning

Recommended?

Fieldwork

Recommended?





Band-tailed Pigeon 1-SC (Feb 2011) B - Possible 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO


Peregrine Falcon, pealei subspecies 1-SC (Jun 2003) B - Possible 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO


streambank lupine 1-E (Jan 2005) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES

Vancouver Island beggarticks 1-SC (Jun 2003) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Western Screech-Owl, kennicottii subspe1-SC (Jan 2005) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Western Toad 1-SC (Jan 2005) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO




Coastal Tailed Frog 1-SC (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Common Nighthawk 1-T (Feb 2010) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable


Edith's Checkerspot, taylori subspecies 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable






Marbled Murrelet 1-T (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Northern Goshawk, laingi subspecies 1-T (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Northern Red-legged Frog 1-SC (Jan 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable


Pacific Water Shrew 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 1 - Yes C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Painted Turtle - Pacific Coast Population 1-E (Dec 2007) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable







Steller Sea Lion 1-SC (Jul 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable















Lewis's Woodpecker 1-T (Jul 2012) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Lewis's Woodpecker (Georgia Depressio 1-T (Jul 2012) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable


Northern Rubber Boa 1-SC (Jan 2005) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Northern Saw-whet Owl, brooksi subspec1-T (Dec 2007) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Oregon Spotted Frog 1-E (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable



Sharp-tailed Snake 1-E (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Spotted Owl 1-E (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Townsend's Mole 1-E (Jan 2005) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable




White Sturgeon 1-E (Aug 2006) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable




Hemmera

File: 302-046.01

January 2015

SubZoneD



Management

Planning

Recommended?

Fieldwork

Recommended?

Barn Owl 1-SC (Jun 2003) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES

Edith's Checkerspot, taylori subspecies 1-E (Jun 2003) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO



Northern Red-legged Frog 1-SC (Jan 2005) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES



Painted Turtle - Pacific Coast Population 1-E (Dec 2007) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES


Short-eared Owl 1-SC (Jul 2012) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Townsend's Mole 1-E (Jan 2005) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Vancouver Island beggarticks 1-SC (Jun 2003) A - Probable 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Western Screech-Owl, kennicottii subspecies 1-SC (Jan 2005) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO


White Sturgeon 1-E (Aug 2006) A - Probable 1- Yes B - Management Actions not known YES NO

Band-tailed Pigeon 1-SC (Feb 2011) B - Possible 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Horned Lark, strigata subspecies 1-E (Jul 2005) B - Possible 2 - No B - Management Actions not known YES NO

Long-billed Curlew 1-SC (Jan 2005) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO





Coastal Tailed Frog 1-SC (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable






Northern Goshawk, laingi subspecies 1-T (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Northern Rubber Boa 1-SC (Jan 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable







streambank lupine 1-E (Jan 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable






Ancient Murrelet 1-SC (Aug 2006) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable








Green Sturgeon 1-SC (Aug 2006) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable




Lewis's Woodpecker (Georgia Depression populati 1-T (Jul 2012) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Marbled Murrelet 1-T (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable






Steller Sea Lion 1-SC (Jul 2005) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable







Hemmera

File: 302-046.01

January 2015

SubZoneE



Management

Planning

Recommended?

Fieldwork

Recommended?

Barn Owl 1-SC (Jun 2003) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES




Vancouver Island beggarticks 1-SC (Jun 2003) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO



Northern Red-legged Frog 1-SC (Jan 2005) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES


Puget Oregonian 1-X B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Short-eared Owl 1-SC (Jul 2012) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO


Townsend's Mole 1-E (Jan 2005) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Western Screech-Owl, kennicottii subspecies 1-SC (Jan 2005) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Band-tailed Pigeon 1-SC (Feb 2011) C - Unlikely 1- Yes C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable





Long-billed Curlew 1-SC (Jan 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Olive-sided Flycatcher 1-T (Feb 2010) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Oregon Forestsnail 1-E C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable






Western Toad 1-SC (Jan 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable








Lewis's Woodpecker (Georgia Depression population) 1-T (Jul 2012) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Northern Goshawk, laingi subspecies 1-T (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable










Hemmera

File: 302-046.01

January 2015

SubZoneF

English Name SARA Likely Occurrence Known Occurrence State of ManagementManagement Planning

Recommended?

Fieldwork

Recommended?

deltoid balsamroot 1-E (Jun 2003) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Great Blue Heron, fannini subspecies 1-SC (Feb 2010) A - Probable 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO


Northern Red-legged Frog 1-SC (Jan 2005) A - Probable 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES

Oregon Forestsnail 1-E (Jan 2005) A - Probable 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO


Short-eared Owl 1-SC (Jul 2012) A - Probable 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

streambank lupine 1-E (Jan 2005) A - Probable 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES


Barn Owl 1-SC (Jun 2003) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES





Vancouver Island beggarticks 1-SC (Jun 2003) B - Possible 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO
























Coastal Tailed Frog 1-SC (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable




Horned Lark, strigata subspecies 1-E (Jul 2005) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Large Marble, insulanus subspecies 1-X (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable











Threaded Vertigo 1-SC (Jul 2012) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable







Hemmera

File: 302-046.01

January 2015

SubZoneG



Management

Planning

Recommended

?

Fieldwork

Recommended?

Great Blue Heron, fannini subspecies 1-SC (Feb 2010) A - Probable 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO







Barn Owl 1-SC (Jun 2003) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES


Nooksack Dace 1-E B - Possible 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES

Oregon Forestsnail 1-E (Jan 2005) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO























Yellow-breasted Chat 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 1- Yes C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable





























Hemmera

File: 302-046.01

January 2015

SubZoneH



Management

Planning

Recommended?

Fieldwork

Recommended?






Great Blue Heron, fannini subspecies 1-SC (Feb 2010) B - Possible 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Monarch 1-SC (Jun 2003) B - Possible 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO









Little Brown Myotis 1-E C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable




Puget Oregonian 1-X (Jan 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable





Yellow-breasted Chat 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 1- Yes C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable



















Olive-sided Flycatcher 1-T (Feb 2010) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable


Painted Turtle - Pacific Coast Population 1-E (Dec 2007) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable


Peregrine Falcon, pealei subspecies 1-SC (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Red Knot 1-T/E (Feb 2010) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable



Short-eared Owl 1-SC (Jul 2012) D - Not Present 1- Yes C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable



Townsend's Mole 1-E (Jan 2005) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable



Western Screech-Owl, kennicottii subspecies 1-SC (Jan 2005) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Western Toad 1-SC (Jan 2005) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable



Hemmera

File: 302-046.01

January 2015

SubZoneI


Management

Planning

Recommended?

Fieldwork

Recommended?




Green Sturgeon 1-SC (Aug 2006) B - Possible 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO



bear's-foot sanicle 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable


brook spike-primrose 1-E (Dec 2007) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

coastal wood fern 1-SC (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

contorted-pod evening-primrose 1-E (Dec 2007) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable


dwarf sandwort 1-E (Jul 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

foothill sedge 1-E (Feb 2010) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Kincaid's lupine 1-X (Feb 2011) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Little Brown Myotis 1-E C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Puget Oregonian 1-X (Jan 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

rosy owl-clover 1-E (Jul 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Rusty Blackbird 1-SC (Mar 2009) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

slender popcornflower 1-T (Feb 2011) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

water-plantain buttercup 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable



Band-tailed Pigeon 1-SC (Feb 2011) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable



Common Nighthawk 1-T (Feb 2010) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Edith's Checkerspot, taylori subspecies 1-E (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable









Monarch 1-SC (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable


Northern Leopard Frog 1-E (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Northern Red-legged Frog 1-SC (Jan 2005) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable




Peregrine Falcon, pealei subspecies 1-SC (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Red Knot 1-T/E (Feb 2010) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable


Short-eared Owl 1-SC (Jul 2012) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable



Western Screech-Owl, kennicottii subspecies 1-SC (Jan 2005) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Western Toad 1-SC (Jan 2005) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable




Hemmera

File: 302-046.01

January 2015

SubZoneJ


Management

Planning

Recommended?

Fieldwork

Recommended?

Barn Owl 1-SC (Jun 2003) A - Probable 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable YES





Common Nighthawk 1-T (Feb 2010) B - Possible 2 - No B - Management Actions not known YES NO

Green Sturgeon 1-SC (Aug 2006) B - Possible 1- Yes A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Horned Lark, strigata subspecies 1-E (Jul 2005) B - Possible 1- Yes B - Management Actions not known YES NO

Long-billed Curlew 1-SC (Jan 2005) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO


Peregrine Falcon, pealei subspecies 1-SC (Jun 2003) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

Red Knot 1-T/E (Feb 2010) B - Possible 2 - No B - Management Actions not known YES NO


Western Toad 1-SC (Jan 2005) B - Possible 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable NO

White Sturgeon 1-E (Aug 2006) B - Possible 1- Yes B - Management Actions not known YES NO

bearded owl-clover 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

brook spike-primrose 1-E (Dec 2007) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Burrowing Owl 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 1- Yes C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

California buttercup 1-E (Feb 2011) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

coast microseris 1-E (Dec 2007) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

coastal Scouler's catchfly 1-E (Jan 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

coastal wood fern 1-SC (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable


dense-flowered lupine 1-E (Aug 2006) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

foothill sedge 1-E (Feb 2010) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable


Howell's triteleia 1-E (Jan 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Kincaid's lupine 1-X (Feb 2011) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Lindley's microseris 1-E (Feb 2010) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable


Muhlenberg's centaury 1-E (Feb 2010) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Peregrine Falcon, anatum subspecies 1-SC (Jun 2012) C - Unlikely 2 - No A - Management Actions well known Not Applicable Not Applicable



Sage Thrasher 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

seaside bird's foot lotus 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

slender popcornflower 1-T (Feb 2011) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

small-flowered tonella 1-E (Jul 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

streambank lupine 1-E (Jan 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

water-plantain buttercup 1-E (Jun 2003) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Western Screech-Owl, kennicottii subspecies 1-SC (Jan 2005) C - Unlikely 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable




Band-tailed Pigeon 1-SC (Feb 2011) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable








Monarch 1-SC (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable


Northern Leopard Frog 1-E (Jun 2003) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Northern Red-legged Frog 1-SC (Jan 2005) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable




Steller Sea Lion 1-SC (Jul 2005) D - Not Present 2 - No C - Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable







Hemmera

File: 302-046.01

January 2015

Port Jurisdiction Species at Risk Inventory · 1/5/2015 · species at risk occurrences/locations...

Documents

Transcript of Port Jurisdiction Species at Risk Inventory · 1/5/2015 · species at risk occurrences/locations...