POND MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE AND RED DRUM, … 326.pdf · Project act i vit ies which took pl...

75
Submitted to: Submitted by: POND MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE AND RED DRUM, SCIAENOPS OCELLA TUS, GUT CONTENT EVALUATION PROJECT FDNR Contract No. C-7918: MML Project No. 310.448 Final Report October 21, 1992-June 30, 1993 Flori da Department of Envi ronmenta 1 Protection Florida Marine Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue SE St. Petersburg, FL 33701-5095 Mote Marine Laboratory 1600 Thompson Parkway Sarasota, Florida 34236 Richard H. Pierce, Ph.D. Director of Research Carole L. Neidig Principal Investigator Prepared by: Carole L. Neidig Pamela A. Phelps Diana P. Skapura Kathleen M. West Diane W. Keal July 30, 1993

Transcript of POND MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE AND RED DRUM, … 326.pdf · Project act i vit ies which took pl...

Submitted to:

Submitted by:

POND MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE AND RED DRUM, SCIAENOPS OCELLA TUS,

GUT CONTENT EVALUATION PROJECT

FDNR Contract No. C-7918: MML Project No. 310.448

Final Report

October 21, 1992-June 30, 1993

Flori da Department of Envi ronmenta 1 Protection Florida Marine Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue SE St. Petersburg, FL 33701-5095

Mote Marine Laboratory 1600 Thompson Parkway Sarasota, Florida 34236

Richard H. Pierce, Ph.D. Director of Research

Carole L. Neidig Principal Investigator

Prepared by: Carole L. Neidig Pamela A. Phelps Diana P. Skapura Kathleen M. West Diane W. Keal

July 30, 1993

1600 THOMPSON PARKWAY

SARASOTA, FLORIDA 34236

PHONE: (813) 388-4441 FAX (813) 388-4312

':4 nonprofit organization dedicated to excellence in marinc scienccs"

July 30, 1993

Mr. William G. Halstead Florida Department of Environmental Protection Stock Enhancement Research Facility 14495 Harllee Road Port Manatee, FL 34221

Reference: Pond Monitoring and Maintenance FDNR Contract No. C-7918; MML Project No. 310.448

Dear Bill:

Please consider this letter and attachments as the Final Report for the above referenced project. Project act i vit ies which took pl ace at the Stock Enhancement Research Facility (SERF) and at Mote Marine Laboratory (MML) from October 21, 1992-June 30, 1993, included: 1) monitoring and maintenance of SERF ponds and tanks, by MML Staff Biologist, Diana Skapura and Biological Technician, Kathleen West; 2) stomach content evaluations of red drum, Sciaenops oce77atus, collected by Florida Marine Research Institute (FMRI) personnel from Bishop Harbor, Tampa Bay and Vol usia County, Florida; and 3) red drum gut passage experiments. These activities will be discussed in the enclosed report under the following headings:

1. FMRI, Stock Enhancement Research F ac il i ty, pond mon itori ng and rna i ntenance.

2. Bishop Harbor, Tampa Bay and Vol usia County red drum, Sciaenops oce77atus, gut content evaluation.

3. Red drum, Sciaenops oce77atus, food passage experiments.

On behalf of Mote Marine Laboratory, I would like to thank you, Dr. Harry Grier, and the Flori da Department of Natural Resources for your support and the opportunity to continue the successful cooperation between Mote Marine Laboratory and the Florida Marine Research Institute.

Sincerely,

~l.~J~~ Carole L. Neidig ~ Senior Biologist

CLN\pmmgut :2 Enclosure cc: Ms. Kelly Donnelly

Dr. Harry Grier Dr. Bill Falls

MICHAEL T. MARTIN CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

WILLIAM R. MOTE PRESIDENT

"- -

KUMAR MAHADEVAN . Ph D EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

Carole Neidig Diana Skapura Roger DeBruler Kathleen West Angela Dukeman Di ane Kea 1 Teresa Starks-DeBruler Tom King Jay Sprinkel Debbie Ingrao Li nda Frankl in

Senior Biologist Staff Biologist Staff Biologist Biological Technician Biological Technician Biological Technician Biological Technician Biological Assistant Senior Biologist Senior Biologist Office Manager

The following are gratefully acknowledged for donating their time and/or services. They were instrumental in making this a successful period.

College Interns

Sean Dory Jessica Spelke David Werle Matt Whitmer

Volunteers

Chris Atkins James Bazzetta Michelle Klei Jan Moss Katharine Reed Dan Sullivan Libby Tyner

Heidelberg College, Ohio Connecticut College, Connecticut Jacksonville University, Florida Edinboro University, Pennsylvania

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS .

LI ST OF FI GURES

LIST OF TABLES

INTRODUCTION

1.

2.

3.

Florida Marine Research Institute (FMRI), Stock Enhancement Research Facility (SERF), Pond Monitoring and Maintenance ..

Bishop Harbor, Tampa Bay and Vol usia County Red Drum, Sciaenops oce77atus, Gut Content Evaluations

Introduction .... Materials and Methods Results ...... . Discussion .... .

Red Drum, Sciaenops oce77atus, Food Passage Experiments

Introduction .... Materials and Methods Results . . Discussion

LITERATURE CITED

APPENDIX I.

APPENDIX I I.

VOLUSIA COUNTY RED DRUM GUT ANALYSIS DATA

BISHOP HARBOR RED DRUM GUT ANALYSIS DATA

i i

i i

iii

iii

1

1

2

2 2 3 4

4

4 5 6 7

8

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Red drum gut analysis form.

Figure 2. Red drum gut analysis custody form.

Figure 3. Length/weight scatter plots for each red drum analyzed from Vol usia County (a), red drum with crustaceans present in gut (b), and red drum with fi sh present in gut (c). (Red drum captured between October 1992-May 1993.)

Figure 4. Length/weight scatter plots for each red drum analyzed from Bishop Harbor (a), red drum with crustaceans present in gut (b), and red drum with fi sh present in gut (c). (Red drum captured between September 1992-May 1993.)

Tabl e 1.

Table 2.

LIST OF TABLES

Items ingested by nontagged and tagged red drum/captured in Vol usia County, Florida (October 1992-May 1993).

Items ingested by nontagged and tagged red drum (total fish = 421) captured in Bishop Harbor, Tampa Bay (September 1992-May 1993).

iii

INTRODUCTION

During the report period (October 21, 1992-June 30, 1993) of the Pond Monitoring and Maintenance and Red Drum, Sciaenops oce77atus, Gut Evaluation project, work was performed at the Florida Marine Research Institute (FMRI) Fish Stock Enhancement Facil ity (SERF) and at Mote Marine Laboratory (MML). The project encompassed the following activities: 1) monitoring and maintenance of SERF ponds and tanks, by MML Staff Biologist, Diana Skapura and Biological Technician, Kathleen West; 2) stomach content evaluations of red drum, Sciaenops oce77atus, collected by Florida Marine Research Institute (FMRI) personnel from Bishop Harbor, Tampa Bay and Vol usia County, Florida; and 3) red drum, Sciaenops oce77atus, gut passage experiments.

1. Fl or; da Mar; ne Research Inst; tute (FMRI), Stock Enhancement Research Fac;l;ty (SERF), Pond Mon;tor;ng and Ma;ntenance

Mote Marine Laboratory personnel, Diana Skapura (Staff Biologist, Supervisor) and Kathleen West (Biological Technician) worked closely with FMRI staff to maintain and monitor finfish pond and tank systems at SERF. Ms. Skapura and Ms . West worked at SERF full-time and were responsible for numerous hatchery operations. Ms. Skapura was responsible for assisting in the coordination of red drum broodstock maintenance when the FMRI position was vacated. In addition, Ms. Skapura took part in personnel schedul ing and the delegation of daily job assignments for pond activities.

Ms. Skapura was on maternity leave from April 23-June 25, 1993, at which time Ms. West was responsible for the delegation of daily job assignments for pond activities, in addition to rendering SCUBA assistance. It was also during Ms . Skapura's maternity leave that Lisa Carter (Biological Technician stationed at MML) worked at SERF part-time to assist with the workload of daily activities. Ms. Skapura's, Ms. West's, and Ms. Carter's activities and responsibilities during the report period included the following:

• filled and fertilized ponds • cleaned and maintained pond bottoms and kettles • collected and analyzed pond zooplankton • stocked red drum eggs into incubators • stocked ponds with red drum fry • collected red drum from ponds for survival estimations • harvested phase I red drum and restocked for phase II grow-out • harvested phase II red drum for tagging and release • assisted in tagging operation of red drum fingerlings • monitored water quality of tanks and ponds • monitored seawater pump system • monitored and maintained aeration system • modified and repaired equipment • ordered supplies and equipment • improved chemical safety • maintained red drum incubation system • monitored and maintained red drum brood stock conditioning

rooms

1

• monitored brood stoCK for disease diagnosis and treatment • prepared fish diets • chronicled daily activities • applied insect control in Phase I ponds • assisted in biopsy of brood stock • gave tours of facility

2. Bishop Harbor, Tampa Bay and Vol usia County Red Drum, Sciaenops ocellatus, Gut Content Evaluations

Introduction

In an effort to enhance populations of red drum, Sciaenops ocellatu5, off Florida's coasts, FMRI released hatchery-produced red drum into Bishop Harbor, Tampa Bay on the west coast and Vol usia County on the east coast. To provide information on the survival and growth of the released red drum, their impact on feral red drum and prey species, habitat preference, movement and recruitment, stock assessment studies were performed by FMRI. Mote Marine laboratory was responsible for the evaluation of food predilection as determined by gut content analysis of nontagged and tagged red drum captured by FMRI. Identification of stomach content compositions and quantities provided information on food preference and the amount consumed.

Materials and Methods

Red drum captured by FMRI staff in Bishop Harbor, Tampa Bay and Vol usia County were preserved in 70 percent ethanol (ETOH) and transferred to MMl for examination. Prior to analysis, each fish was verified as a red drum, scanned for a coded wire tag, measured for total length (Tl) and standard length (Sl) to the nearest 0.1 mm and weighed to the nearest 0.01 g. If available, 20 red drum were processed from each collection and information provided by FMRI and data generated by MMl for each fi sh was recorded on a Red Drum Gut Ana lys is Form (Figure 1).

To evaluate a red drum gut, the carcass was placed in a petri dish or dissecting tray and kept moist with reverse osmosis (RO) water. Analysis began by exposing the abdominal cavity by removing a flap of muscle and skin tissue from the side by making an incision from the anus forward to the lower jaw, dorsal to the operculum, bacK to the anus. The gut (stomach and intestine) was eviscerated by making an incision anterior to the esophagus and another at the anus. The gut was weighed to the nearest 0.01 g and stomach fullness was defined on a scale of 0 = empty to 5 = distended.

The gut was incised along the length of the stomach and intestine. The items contained in the gut were removed with a fine point probe, placed in a petri dish and were examined using a dissecting microscope, identified to the lowest possible taxon and enumerated (Figure 1). The item(s) from taxa were weighed to the nearest 0.01 g, measured (if appropriate) and preserved in a vial containing 70 percent ETOH. Vial labels included the following information: identification of taxa; location (BH or VC) of capture; station; collection date; total length (mm) and wet weight (g) of fish. Gut data were entered into a

2

computer database {Paradox, Borland and Associates, 3.5 software}. A collection of representative specimens from each taxon was cataloged and is now referenced at MML for use in future identifications.

After analysis, the carcasses {excluding the gut} of tagged red drum were placed in 70 percent ETOH and returned to SERF. In March, a Red Drum Gut Analysis Custody Form {Figure 2} was developed at MML to increase efficiency of tracking samples. Thereafter, the form accompanied samples sent to MML and those returned to SERF.

Results

Red drum from Vol usia County, Florida, were collected for gut content analysis between October 1992 through May 1993 . Gut contents from 254 red drum, measuring in total length from 7 mm to 282 mm, were examined . Total and standard lengths {mm} and weight {g} are summarized below.

TL

Avg 123.4 Min 7 Max 282

SL

93.3 39

196

16.3 0.88

123.1

Of these, 12.6 percent had empty guts {Table I} . Prey organisms most frequently encountered in the guts were in order of occurrence: I} polychaetes; 2} amphipods; 3} Corophium sp.; and, 4} Tanaidacea. The crustaceans were found in various stages of decomposition. When whole items were not available, identification was made by examining claws, rostrums and swimmerettes. Crustaceans identified to genus included Alpheus heterochaelis, Callinectes sp. and Corophium sp.

Fish were the second most abundant food item {Table I} {Figure 3} although most fish were decomposed and only scales, otoliths and vertebrae remained. The only fish which could be identified was a chain pipefish, Syngnathus louisianae {a. 4%} • A total of 11. 1 percent of the guts contained i terns grouped ina category designated as "Miscellaneous" {plant material, sand and marine debris}, which could not be identified, or were not placed in the fish or crustacean groups but incl uded insect parts, pl ant matter {bark, wood and undigested seagrass}, mud, bivalves, and polychaete parts. Seventy-eight percent of the fish guts analyzed contained some food item which was labeled as "unidentified" {Appendix I}.

Red drum from Bishop Harbor, Tampa Bay, were collected between September 1992 and May 1993. Gut contents from 421 red drum, which measured 23 mm to 282 mm TL, were examined. Length and weight measurements are summarized below.

TL

Avg 82.2 Min 23 Max 535

SL

64.8 18

316

3

Wts

18.8 0.88

3450

Few red drum (5.7%) had empty guts (Table 2). Most of the red drum (26.6%) contained items categorized as "Miscellaneous", and included unidentified items, sand, mud, plant material (Tha7assia, algae and bark, twigs), insect parts, polychaete parts and mollusks. A total of 76.7 percent of the guts analyzed contained some type of food item which was labeled "unidentified". Red drum contained arthropod parts including snapping shrimp, grass shrimp, penaeid shrimp, tanaids, blue crabs, mud crabs, mysids (32.9% of guts contained) and amphipods (44.9% of guts contained). Crustaceans were from the order Tannaidacea or the families Alpheidae, Ampeliscidae, Corophiidae, Mysidae, Palaemonidae, Paratanaidae, Penaeidae, Portunidae and Xanthidae. Crustaceans identified to genus included A7pheus heterochae7is, Ampe7isca sp. (10.9% of the guts contained), Ca77inectes sp., Corophium sp., Leptoche7ia sp., Pa7aemonetes sp., and Penaeus sp. In addition, 11.2 percent of the fish guts cont~ined polychaetes.

Only 3.1 percent of the red drum contained fish parts. Most of the fish had been digested and only otoliths, scales and spines remained. One species which could be identified was Anchoa sp. (Appendix II) .

In addition, some red drum from Vol usia County and Bishop Harbor were improperly preserved, and the gut contents were so deteriorated as to preclude evaluation. Samples in this condition were noted.

Discussion

Crustaceans were abundant in all sizes of red drum examined from both Volusia County and Bishop Harbor (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Fish remains were also found in all sizes of red drum but were predominant in red drum from Vol usia County. These findings generally agree with previous studies by Pearson (1929), Gunter (1945), and Boothbay and Avault (1971). Peters and McMichael (1987) found amphipods to be the most abundant crustacean in juvenile red drum 30 mm to 75 mm, which agreed with our results. It is possible that unidentifiable organic matter which occurred frequently may have been the remains of digested fish, especially when crustacean remains were not evident. Additional items, such as plant material, mud, sand and bark were not considered food items and were perhaps inadvertently consumed. The red drum appeared to be indiscriminate feeders since most of the fish contained a combination of two or more types of food items. This agreed with observations made by Boothbay and Avault (1971) from red drum captured in a coastal marsh area in southeastern Louisiana.

3. Red Drum, Sciaenops oce71atus, Food Passage Experiments

Introduction

Currently no published data are available concerning the rate of digestion and food passage in fingerling red drum. This along with data on the amount of food found in a gut would be useful in estimating daily food consumption. These studies could provide additional information on their digestive physiology, behavior and energy requirements.

4

The purpose of this study was to determine the average time for a food item to pass through the digestive system of a fingerling red drum. This was tested in a preliminary trial and during three experiments. No attempts were made to estimate the influences of abiotic factors, such as temperature.

Materials and Methods

A preliminary trial and the three experiments were conducted in October and November 1992. Phase II (114-218 mm TL) red drum obtained from SERF were used. Aquaria (32-1iter) containing five fish each were positioned on water tables. Black plastic grate (2.5 cm in height) covered the aquarium bottoms which prevented fish from consuming beads off the bottom of an aquarium. Aeration was provided by a 2-\" fused glass airstone positioned 5.0 cm from the back panel. Parameters included a 12:12 photoperiod; temperature of 22.0°C ± 1.0°C; and salinity 33 ppt. Temperature (OC), salinity (ppt), pH, nitrite (mg/1), ammonia (mg/1) and dissolved oxygen (ppm) were recorded daily.

Originally, two methods for use in estimating food passage time were considered. The first was to use 10 micron, latex Microbeads® purchased by FMRI from Po1ysciences, Inc, and the second was to use 2 mm glass beads. The larger glass beads (2 mm) were selected for use in these experiments, because their larger size made them more visible than microbeads and they were cost-effective.

A preliminary trial was conducted to determine the period of time required for digestion (ingestion to excretion). Shrimp was selected as the food item to transport beads to the red drum. Orange and b1 ue gl ass beads (2 nvn) were inserted into 6 mm sections of peeled shrimp. In each of the experiments a mixture of 850 m1 trout chow, 60 m1 water and 120 medium shrimp was used as the food i tern to transfer the beads. The trout chow, water and shrimp were homogenized in a food processor, kneaded into a dough and formed into 7 mm diameter balls, each containing one glass bead.

Prior to the preliminary trial the fish were fed a diet of shrimp to satiation daily. At the start of the trial, fish in two aquaria (10 red drum) were fed 12 pieces of beaded shrimp. The aquaria bottoms were observed hourly and the number of beads and time found were recorded.

Experiment I was conducted to validate the results from the preliminary trial. Seven aquaria (35 fish) were used. During acclimation, a red tide bloom occurred in New Pass, Sarasota, resulting in the shut down of the Laboratory's incoming sea-water system. To compensate for this and to prevent poor water quality, the fish were fed each fifth day for two weeks instead of daily. The experiment began by p 1 aci ng fi fteen beaded ba 11 sin each aquari urn. Based on preliminary trial results and to examine fish at various stages of digestion they were terminated at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours post-feeding.

The data from Experiment II were used to compare gut passage times of fed versus starved red drum. Sixteen aquaria, each containing five red drum were labeled "starved" or "satiated". The satiated group of fish were fed daily for five days; the starved group was not fed. The experiment began at the time both groups were fed beaded food. At 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24 and 48 hours post-feeding five fish from each group were collected and examined.

5

In Experiment III a comparison was made of gut passage times of fed versus starved red drum but with different collection times from Experiment II. Six aquaria each containing five red drum were designated either starved or satiated. Five days prior to the experiment, the satiated group was fed daily­and the other group was starved. The experiment began at the time fish were fed beaded food. At 8, 16 and 24 hours post-feeding five from each group were collected and examined.

Several collection methods were attempted to determine the optimum procedure which would keep fish from regurgitating the beaded food; however, some variation in methods existed between Experiments I, II and III. At post-feeding collection times, red drum from the designated aquarium were euthanized in a basin containing 50 ml of Trance® (commercial compound) and 4 liters of seawater (ratio of 1:80). In Experiment I, fish collecte_d between 1-6 hours post-feeding were euthanized, measured (TL) and their guts were removed and preserved (70% ETOH). Fish from the 12 and 24 hour collections were frozen and eviscerated the following day. In Experiments II and III, after the fish were euthanized, an incision was made into the peritoneum from the anus to the pectoral girdle to allow ETOH to enter the abdominal cavity and preserve the gut. The whole fish was then preserved (70% ETOH) in a labelled jar for processing at a later date.

A Food Passage Analysis Form (Figure 5) was completed for each fish, including the data: feeding and collection times; wet weight (g), standard length (mm), and total length (mrn). The abdominal cavity was exposed and the gut was removed. Tota 1 gut 1 ength (mrn) (esophagus to anus), stomach 1 ength (mm) (esophagus to pyloric caeca) and intestine length (mm) (pyloric caeca to the anus) were recorded. The presence of beads (observed through the semi­transparent wall of the gut) and the distance (mm) of each bead from the pyloric caeca or anus was recorded.

Results

In the preliminary trial, the first beads were observed in the aquaria after three hours post-feeding. By 24 hours post-feeding, 87.6 percent of the beads had been recovered indicating that food passage should be completed within 24 hours post-feeding. In Experiment I, most beads were found in the stomach of red drum at 24 hours post-feeding (last collection). This indicated that food passage took longer than 24 hours.

In Experiments II and II I, the number of beads found in the stomach/intestines of satiated versus starved red drum at 8, 16, and 24 hours post-feeding were as follows:

Coll ect ion Experiment II Experiment II I Time Satiated Starved Satiated Starved

8 hr 8/3 7/2 10/2 3/1

16 hr 7/7 10/2 6/3 6/1

24 hr 0/3 7/4 6/10 13/0

6

The results demonstrated that bead passage was not dependent on whether the fish had been starved or satiated.

It was noted that in the preliminary trial and in Experiments I, II and III, a statistical analysis (F-Test) of the data showed that red drum total lengths (Figure 6a) and weights (Figure 6b) correlated significantly (.01 level) with gut length. In addition, fish size (TL) showed no correlation (.07) to the number of beads in the gut.

Discussion

Red drum gut passage time could not be positively determined from the data. Gut passage patterns are likely to be complex and are affected by many variables (Jobling, 1986). This was demonstrated by the conflicting food passage times between the preliminary trial and Experiment I, which was attributed to the varying amounts of food consumed during acclimation. Experiments II and III were performed to test if food passage was slower in fi sh whi ch had been starved versus those which had been satiated prior to feeding them the beads. No positive correlations could be drawn from the results obtained. Further investigations are needed to make these determinations.

To determine the time required for food passage in fingerling red drum, further studies are needed concerning food types. Studies have shown that gut passage may vary with different nutritional and textural parameters (Jobling, 1986). Nutrient rich foods tend to move slower than low nutrition foods through the digestive tract (Jobling, 1986). In addition, indigestible components are the last to be emptied from the stomach (Pandain, 1967; Kionka, 1972; Gannon, 1976).

In MML experiments, the passage time for a indigestible and non-caloric component (glass bead) rather than the digestible food matter (shrimp and trout chow) was examined. More meaningful data may have resulted if the passage time of natural food items marked with a coloring agent had been examined.

7

LITERATURE CITED

Boothbay, R.N. and J.W. Avault, Jr. 1975. Food habits, length-weight relationship, condition factor, and growth of juvenile red drum, Sciaenops oce77atus, in southern Louisiana. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 104(1):35-45.

Gannon, J.E. 1976. The effects of differential digestion rates of zooplankton by alewife, A70sa pseudoharengus, on determinations of selected feedings. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 105:89-95.

Gunter, G. 1945. Studies on marine fishes of Texas. Inst. Mar. Sci. Univ. Texas. 1(1):1-190.

Jobling, M. 1986. Mythical models of gastric emptying and implications for food consumption studies. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 16:1-3. pp. 35-50.

Kionka, B.C. and J.T. Windell. 1972. Differential movement of digestible and indigestible food fractions in rainbow trout, Sa7mo gairdneri. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 101:112-115.

Pandian, T.J. and E. Vivekanandan. 1985. Energetics of feeding and digestion. pp. 99-124. In P. Tytler and P. Calow (ed.). Fish Energetics-New Perspectives. Croom Helm. London.

Peters, K. and R.H. McMichael, Jr. 1987. Early life history of the red drum, Sciaenops oce77atus (Pisces: Sciaenidae), in Tampa Bay, Florida. Estuaries. 10(2):92-107.

Pearson, J.C. 1929. Natural history and conservation of the redfish and other commercial Sciaenids on the Texas coast. Bur. Fisheries Bull. 64:178-194.

8

FIGURES

MML RED DRUM GUT EVALUATION FORM

FI.h No. Tag Dale ColleCllon Slle/No. Slalion Gear Rep . I Tl (mml I SL (mml I wW!ill GW (91 I SF (0 · 51

I STOMACH CONTENT-S----u

- ---- ----- - - II INTESTINE CONTENTS -I

I A I V; I M I V; r~j 7i I ~ IU~ lo~lv; r A Iv; I-MI~I-p-j V; I ' 17.~ I DC I~

I' 1:1 0 1v;1 u 1v;1 E I I R' I~'~I 0 17'~1 u 17~l> I-F-f-I I COMMENTS: COMMENTS: I

1 c, I c, I ~: ~:

I i I Iii iii -r- r--- r- " 1

FI.h No . Tag Dale Collection SltelNo. Slalion I Gear I Rep . I Tl Imml I SL Imm' I WW 19' GW 191 I Sf 10 ·li l

STOMACH CONTENTS II INTESTINE CONTENTS --] Ii iii ,

r~T~_1 ~ I V; I p I V; I ' I V; I OC I V; II A I V; I M I ~,~ I p I 7; I ' ~ I DC J~~-

I ' 1 V; 1 0 1 V; I u I V; I E I I I ~'I V; I 0 1 V; 1 u I V; 1 E B- [-l I COMMENTS: II COMMENTS: ]

I~, E. I NOTE: SF ISTOMACH FULLNESS' : 0 - EMPTY; 5 - DISTENDED FOOD ITEMS : A - AMPHIf'OD; M ~ MYSID; P - f'ORTUNIDS ; S - SHRIMP; OC ~ OTHER CRU S TA CEAN S;

F D FISH; D - DIFFERENT ITEMS ; U - UNIDENTIFIED; E - EMPTY

ANALYZED BY : ENTERED BY :

Figure 1. Red drum gut analysis form.

MML RED DRUM GUT ANALYSIS CUSTODY SHEET -- .. -. - _.-

Capture Dil te oT No . 01 Tag location Captur e Site Number: (Grid fI , collec tionfl) Rep. No. Gear Drum Retention Completed hy : !Initi al/Date) IDli .VC. sOI per Jar ( + . -)

Delivered to MML by: _____ _ _ ___ _ ____ _ _ Released from MML to : _________________ _

Date of Delivery: Date of Release: _ _______ ___ _ _

Figure 2. Red drum gut analysis custody form.

a)

b)

c)

,,-... 01

'--'" 4J

~ ..c 01 11)

3:

BOr i ;\ /1 Drum ,

60 ~

! 1

40 1 i

20 1

~ I

O -t-i-~

o 50

VOLUSIA COU N1Y ----~--. ---1

'0

100 150

, ,

200

BO .. --------~-~ ---~---~----- ------, ~---- l

60 J j

40 J !

i I

'1

I

Drum with Crustaceans in Gut I i j

I i

I I I

I I

20 ~ , .'

'I ' ., • ,., \

i ... J."'~" o +-~---~~ --~I---~---'I -

I I I

-.--- - - ~ o 50 100 150 200

---- ------1 BO r

~ Drum with Fish in Gut

60 ~

J !

40 ~ i

J

20 j I

1 I

'.

• •

I I I I !Ii

•• •• • I .«': '.. i

" ,.- I ot .---~.---~~-,. I r---~---fl

0 50 100 150 200

Standard Length (mm)

Figure 3. Length/weight scatter plots for each red drum analyzed from Volusia County (a), red drum with crustaceans present in gut (b), and red drum \"Iith fi sh present in gut (c). (Red drum captured between October 1992-May 1993.)

a)

b)

c)

80

1 1 All Drum

60 1 1

401 20

j i I

I i I

BISHOP HARBOR

• • ••

• • • • . . · .

- ------,

'.

I

! o +--~ ----.., .... ,.e-~, ~-r- .-----.--------r,--~-~ o 50 100 150 200

80 -r1-- ---- -- --- - - - - - -- - ------ ------,

: Drum wi th Crustaceans in Gu t I I !

60 ~ i

~

40 j I 1 •

20 ~ • ~.

~ ~~~I .,.' .

. . · . . .

••

I I I ~.,...

O ~I----".~~~· .. ~,~-= I --.---- - ----,------.--~ o 50 100 150 200

80 , - --------­

: Drum with

601 1

401 I

20 J I

a L~-"----'y----" o 50

Fish in Gut

..

i

I .. I •• • I ---yl---- -..----r--~______J

100 150 200

St andard Length (mm)

Figure 4. Length/weight scatter plots for each red drum analyzed from Bishop Harbor (a), red drum with crustaceans present in gut (b), and red drum with fish present in gut (c). (Red drum captured between September 1992-May 1993.)

TABLES

Tabl e 1. Items ingested by nontagged and tagged red drum (total fish = 254) captured in Volusia County, Florida (October 1992-May 1993).

NO. FISH PERCENT INGESTED ITEMS WITH ITEM WITH ITEM

Miscellaneous Empty 32 12.6 Plant material 23 9.1 Unidentified 198 78.0 Sand 4 1.6 Marine debris 1 .4

Phylum Nematoda Nematoda 4 1.6

Phylum Annelida Polychaeta 29 11.4 Nereidae 1 .4 Capitellidae 4 1.6

Phyl urn Mollusca Mollusca 1 .4

Phylum Arthropoda Crustacea 13 5.1 Mysidacea 14 5.5 Tanaidacea 19 7.5 Isopoda 5 2.0 Amphipoda 24 9.4 Corophium spp. 22 8.7 Grandidierella bonnieroides 3 1.2 Unidentified crab 2 .8 Unidentified shrimp 11 4.3 Penaeidae 6 2.4 Caridea 2 .8 Palaemonetes spp. 1 .4 Palaemonetes pUglO 1 .4 Alpheus heterochaelis 1 .4 Portunidae 3 1.2 Ca 11 i nectes spp. 2 .8 Insecta 6 2.4

Phylum Vertebrata Unidentified fish 59 23.2 Etrumeus teres 1 .4 Myrophis punctatus 1 .4 Syngnathus louisiana 1 .4

Table 2. Items ingested by nontagged and tagged red drum (total fish = 421) captured in Bishop Harbor, Tampa Bay (September 1992-May 1993).

NO. FISH PERCENT INGESTED ITEMS WITH ITEM WITH ITEM

Miscellaneous Empty 24 5.7 Plant material 79 18 .8 Unidentified 323 76.7 Sand 8 1.9 Trout Chow 1 .2

Phylum Nematoda Nematoda 6 1.4

Phylum Annelida Polychaeta 47 11.2 Nereidae 4 1.0

Phyl urn Mollusca Moll usca 3 .7

Phylum Arthropoda Crustacea 37 8.8 Ostracoda 8 1.9 Mysidacea 138 32.8 Tanaidacea 15 3.6 Isopoda 10 2.4 Cyathura pol ita 8 1.9 Amphipoda 189 44.9 Ampelisca spp. 46 10.9 Corophium spp. 39 9.3 Grandidierella bonnieroides 5 1.2 Unidentified crab 27 6.4 Unidentified shrimp 12 2.9 Penaeus spp. 1 .2 Leptochela spp. 1 .2 Portunidae 2 .5 Callinectes spp. 6 1.4 Xanthidae 2 .5 Insecta 3 .7

Phylum Vertebrata Unidentified fish 10 2.4 Anchoa spp. 3 .7

APPENDIX I

VOLUSIA COUNTY RED DRUM GUT ANALYSIS DATA

Appendix I Table 1. Red drum gut analysis data (October 1992-May 1993, Vol usia County, Florida).

Fish NO. TAG DATE COllECTION SITE GEAR TL SL ww Gil SF LOCATION GUT ITEM IIlF COUNT liT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

365 U 27-Oct-92 VC? MBS 282 5.66 3 I PLANT 3 I UNIDENTI FlED I UNIDENTIFIED F 45 13 S PLANT 1 S SYNGNATHUS LOUISIANA II 1 33

337 U 09-Noy-92 VC? MBS 248 3.32 3 I CRUSTACEA F 31 .70 I UNIDENTI FlED S EMPTY

340 U 09-Noy-92 VC? MB2 192 .94 0 I EMPTY S PLANT 1 S TANAIDACEA II 2

342 U 09-Noy-92 VC? MBS 183 1.10 0 I CRUSTACEA F 23 S EMPTY

343 U 09-Noy-92 VC? MBS 187 1.19 I UNIDENTIFIED S FISH F 1

344 U 09-Noy-92 VC? MBS 238 2.21 3 I CRUSTACEA F 7 .01 I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

345 U 09-Noy-92 VC? MBS 215 2.58 2 I CRUSTACEA F 27 .08 I UN !DENTI F I ED 6 .02 S ALPHEUS HETEROCHAELIS F 2 .42

347 - 09-Nov-92 VC? MBS 177 1.08 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

349 U 09-Noy-92 VC? MBS 204 1.20 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

350 U 09-Nov-92 VC? MBS 200 1.19 0 I EMPTY S PLANT 2

357 U 09-Noy-92 VC? MBS 182 1.14 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

358 U 09-Noy-92 VC? MBS 197 1.35 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

359 U 09-Nov-92 VC? MBS 212 0 I UN IDENTI F I ED S EMPTY

360 U 09-Nov-92 VC? MBS 222 1.77 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

361 U 09-Nov-92 VC? MBS 130 .90 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

362 U 09-Noy-92 VC? MBS 225 1.83 0 I EMPTY S PLANT 5 S UNIDENTIFIED 2

363 U 09-Nov-92 VC? MBS 235 2. 15 0 I EMPTY S PLANT

364 U 09-Noy-92 VC? MBS 205 1.33 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

Page 2 Appendix I Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (October 1992-May 1993, Vol usia County,

Florida) .

Fish NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

366 U 09· Nov-92 VC7 MBS 190 1.35 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S SAND S UNIDENTIFIED 3 S UNIDENTIFIED F 4

367 U 09-Nov-92 VC7 MBS 185 .91 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

368 U 09-Nov-92 VC7 MBS 187 .87 0 I UNIDENTIFIED F 12 .02 S FISH F 1 S PLANT 2

369 U 09-Nov-92 VC7 MBS 225 1.83 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 2 I UNIDENTIFIED F 13 .03 S EMPTY

338 U 10-Nov-92 VC7 M13 0.52 152 1.10 0 I CRUSTACEA F 8 .03 I PLANT 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S CRUSTACEA F 2

339 U 10-Nov-92 VC7 MB2 182 .80 0 EMPTY I EMPTY

341 U 10-Nov-92 VC7 M14 0.53 152 .97 0 I AMPHIPOOA F 4 I CRUSTACEA F 26 I PLANT 26 I UNIDENTIFIED S CRUSTACEA F 2 S PLANT 3

346 U 10-Nov-92 VC7 M14 0.53 198 1.64 0 I AMPHIPOOA W 3 I COROPH I UM SPP. W 1 S AMPHIPOOA F 2 S CRUSTACEA F 2

348 U 10-Nov-92 VC7 MBS 195 1.11 0 I EMPTY S FISH F

351 U 10-Nov-92 VC7 MBS 202 1.22 0 I EMPTY S MYSIDACEA W 2

352 U 10-Nov-92 VC7 MBS 182 1.56 0 I CRUSTACEA F 16 I POLYCHAETA I SAND 93 S EMPTY

353 U 10-Nov-92 VC7 M13 0.52 182 1.18 0 I CRUSTACEA F 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

354 U 10-Nov-92 VC7 MBS 221 1.29 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S UNIDENTIFIED

Page 3 Appendix I Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (October 1992-May 1993, Vol usia County,

Florida).

Fish NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL ww Gil SF LOCATION GUT ITEM II/F COUNT liT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

355 U 10-Noy-92 VC? MBS 180 .96 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

356 U 10-Noy-92 VC? M14 0.53 178 .91 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

21 * 24-Noy-92 MA 184 151 42.86 2.92 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S CALLINECTES SPP. II 1 .1 S FISH F 1 .13 6 S PENAEIDAE F 1 .65 21

22 * 24-Noy-92 GRID '101 182 148 43.39 1.43 I FISH F 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S FISH F 1 4

23 * 24-Noy-92 GRID '149 203 165 60.92 1.74 2 I FISH F 12 .03 I PLANT 2 S CRAB F 4 .01 S FISH F 6 S FISH II 1 4 S FISH II 2 .03 7 S PLANT 1 S UNIDENTIFIED

24 * 24-Noy-92 GRID '149 193 157 51.83 1.81 2 I INSECTA F 5 I PLANT .01 S FISH 1 S INSECTA 3 S UNIDENTIFIED

25 * 25 -Noy-92 MBS 199 163 63.04 1.64 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

26 * 25 -Noy-92 MB2 180 144 42.48 1.28 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

13 - 21-Jan-93 IIILD 112 91 72 7.01 .56 5 I EMPTY S PALAEMONETES SPP. II 2 .24

14 - 21-Jan-93 IIILD 112 70 57 2.95 .01 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 2 S EMPTY

15 - 21 -Jan-93 WILD 112 58 44 1.43 .04 3 I EMPTY S MYSIDACEA F 36 .029

16 - 21-Jan-93 WILD 112 82 61 4.33 .30 0 I CRUSTACEA F 14 .02 S EMPTY

17 - 21-Jan-93 IIILD 112 78 60 4.14 .10 0 I CRUSTACEA F 7 .03 I MOLLUSCA F S EMPTY

18 - 21 -Jan-93 WILD 112 95 74 6.69 .20 I UNIDENTI F I ED S EMPTY

Page 4 Appendix I Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (October 1992-May 1993, Volusia County,

Florida).

Fish NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COONT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

19 - 21-Jan-93 WILD 112 122 98 14.13 .17 0 I CRUSTACEA F 2 I UNIDENTIFIED F S EMPTY

20 - 21-Jan-93 WILD 112 80 58 4.16 .26 4 I SAND S FISH W 16

731 - 02-Feb-93 GRID 037 NA 104 83 8.73 .23 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.06 S EMPTY

733 - 02-Feb-93 GRID 138 S1 93 75 6.20 .27 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S FISH 0.05

734 - 02-Feb-93 GRID 138 S1 100 81 7.52 .38 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S EMPTY

735 - 02-Feb-93 GRID 336 S1 86 70 5.51 .25 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

738 - 02-Feb-93 MB2 S1 108 85 10.26 .32 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.06 S COROPHIUM SPP. W 9 0.02 S MYSIDACEA W 1 NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S UNIDENTIFIED NA

743 - 02-Feb-93 MBS S1 113 92 10.98 .29 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S FISH F 0.04

744 - 02-Feb-93 GRID 336 S1 64 51 2.12 .03 0 I UNIDENTIFIED NA S EMPTY

747 - 02-Feb-93 MBS S1 101 81 8.73 .28 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.07

748 - 02-Feb-93 MBS S1 132 98 17.68 .57 3 I FISH F NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0. 06 S COROPHIUM SPP. W 3 0.01 S FISH W 1 .20

749 - 02-Feb-93 MBS S1 120 99 13.70 .67 4 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.05 S COROPHIUM SPP. W 5 0.03 S FISH W 2 .22 S PLANT 1 S SHRIMP W 1 0.06

750 - 02-Feb-93 MBS S1 106 84 8.59 .28 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S COROPH I UM SPP. W 3 0.01 S FISH W 1 0.06

751 - 02-Feb-93 MBS S1 110 88 9.63 .52 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.05 S FISH F 7 .21 S FISH W 1 NA S MYROPHIS PUNCTATUS W 1 NA

Page 5 Appendix I Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (October 1992-May 1993, Vol usia County,

Florida).

Fish NO, TAG ~ATE COLbECTION SITE GEAR Ib SL IN Gil SF LOCATION GUT ITEM IIlF COUNT liT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

752 - 02-Feb-93 MBS S1 111 92 10 :49 .50 4 I AMPHIPOOA F 50 0.07 S AHPHIPOOA II 3 0.01 S COROPHIUM SPP. II 2 NA S MYSIDACEA II 1 NA S PLANT 1 S UNIDENTIFIED

753 - 02-Feb-93 MBS S1 107 87 9.66 .25 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S COROPHIUM SPP. II 6 0.01

754 - 02-Feb-93 MBS S1 114 93 11.17 .46 4 I AMPH I POOA II 2 NA I COROPH IUM SPP. II 4 0.02 I ISOPOOA II 2 NA I HYSIDACEA II 11 NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.09

755 - 02-Feb-93 MBS S1 115 93 11.39 .32 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.04 S PLANT S UNIDENTIFIED 0.05

756 - 02-Feb-93 MBS S1 102 81 8.12 .23 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S COROPHIUM SPP. II 1 NA S FISH F 2 NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

757 - 02-Feb-93 MBS S1 102 82 8.05 .21 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S FISH II 0.02 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

758 - 02-Feb-93 MBS S1 112 92 11.42 .37 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S AHPHIPOOA II 2 0.01 S FISH II 1 0.06

759 - 02-Feb-93 HBS S1 123 100 15.00 1.00 5 S FISH F 5 NA S FISH II 7 .33 S PENAEIDAE II 2 .23 S PLANT 1

760 - 02-Feb-93 HBS S1 104 84 8.38 .24 2 I TANAIDACEA II 1 NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S COROPHIUH SPP. II 8 0.01

761 - 02-Feb-93 HBS S1 110 91 10.97 .33 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S HYSIDACEA II 4 0.01 S PLANT 1 NA S UN I DENTI F I ED NA

762 - 02-Feb-93 MBS S1 116 97 11.06 .34 5 I TANAIDACEA II NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.04 S PALAEHONETES PUGIO II 0.08 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

Page 6 Appendix I Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (October 1992-May 1993, Vol usia County,

Florida).

Fish NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL \AI Gil SF LOCATION GUT ITEM II/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

763 - 02- Feb-93 MBS S1 130 104 18.19 1.22 5 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.06 S FISH II .66 S UNIDENTIFIED

764 - 02-Feb-93 MBS S1 112 91 10.79 .38 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S FISH II 2 0.09

630 03-Feb-93 BPC 103 84 9.45 .34 0 I AMPHIPODA F 4 0 I NEMATODA II 1 I UN I DENTI F I ED S COROPHIUM SPP. W 4 S PLANT 1

645 - 03-Feb-93 MBA NA 80 65 4.04 .13 3 I UNIDENTIFIED NA S COROPH IUM SPP. II 4 NA S MYSIDACEA II 12 0.02

737 - 03-Feb-93 MB2 NA 93 75 5.84 .18 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S UNIDENTIFIED NA

741 - 03-Feb-93 MB2 NA 87 70 5.26 .13 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S MYSIDACEA II NA

742 - 03-Feb-93 MB2 NA 89 73 5.58 .20 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S FISH F NA S FISH W 0.02

n1 + 17-Feb-93 MB5 NA 202 167 76.87 3.26 3 I UNIDENTIFIED .42 S CALLINECTES SPP. II .21 S UNIDENTIFIED .44

n2 - 17-Feb-93 MB2 NA 108 87 10.56 .31 3 I FISH F NA I UN I DENT IF I ED 0.01 S FISH F 5 NA S SHRIMP F 1 0.01

n4 - 17-Feb-93 MA NA 135 110 21.26 .82 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.07 S FISH F 0.06 14 S PENAEIDAE II .23

n5 - 17-Feb-93 MA NA 107 89 9.66 .41 4 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S FISH F 1 .04 S FISH II 2 .15

n6 - 17-Feb-93 MA NA 125 112 16.71 .30 I UN IDENTI F I ED 0.04 S FISH F NA S SHRIMP F S UNIDENTI FlED 0.01

727 - 17-Feb-93 MB2 NA 108 89 10.10 .29 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S SHRIMP F 0.04

728 - 17-Feb-93 MB2 NA 94 76 7.21 .28 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S COROPH IUM SPP. II 3 NA

Page 7 Appendix I Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (October 1992-May 1993, Vol usia County,

Florida) .

Fish NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

S FISH F NA S FISH W 0.06

729 - 17-Feb-93 MA NA 75 60 3.04 .12 4 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S MYSIDACEA W 13 0.05

730 - 17-Feb-93 MB2 NA 110 88 10.90 .21 I UNIDENTIFIED NA S TANAIDACEA W 6 0.01 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

732 - 17-Feb-93 091 NA 100 81 9.37 .32 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S FISH W 1 0.04

745 - 17-Feb-93 MB5 NA T7 63 4.27 .14 2 I POLYCHAETA 1 NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S FISH W 1 0.04 S POLYCHAETA F 3 NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

723 - 18-Feb-93 GRID 124 NA 113 91 12.05 .35 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.04 S PENAEIDAE W .10

746 - 24-Feb-93 TP1 TN 6.78 240.00 4 I MARINE DEBRIS NA I UNIDENTIFIED 8.0 S ETRUMEUS TERES W 7 160 123 158 172 127 135 152 127 S FISH F 4 .20 S SHRIMP W 1 0.05

801 - 02-Mar-93 GRID II 171 NA 103 82 8.33 .27 3 I NEMATODA W 1 NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S FISH W 2 0.08 S MYSIDACEA W 2 0.01

802 - 02-Mar-93 GRID II 171 NA 103 83 9.38 .31 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S MYSIDACEA W 7 .04

900 - 02-Mar-93 BPC S1 87 70 5.10 .16 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S COROPHIUM SPP. W 2 NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.03

901 - 02-Mar-93 BPC S1 100 82 8.19 .12 0 I UN IDENTI FlED 0.01 S EMPTY

780 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 120 101 12.98 .55 4 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S CRUSTACEA W 1 NA S FISH W 4 .24

781 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 116 97 12.46 .33 0 I NEMATODA W 1 NA S EMPTY

782 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 109 90 9.64 .21 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S POLYCHAETA F NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.03

Page 8 Appendix I Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (October 1992-May 1993, Volusia County,

Florida).

Fish NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL W Gil SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

783 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 87 71 5.15 .10 3 I UN IDENTI F I EO 0.01 S FISH W 0.01

805 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 98 81 7.46 .26 3 I UN IDENT IF I EO 0.01 S AMPHIPOOA W 3 0.01 S FISH F 2 NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

806 - 03 -Mar-93 MB2 NA 89 73 5.00 .14 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S AMPHIPOOA W 3 0.01 S TANAIDACEA W 1 NA

807 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 97 79 7.25 .19 3 I POLYCHAETA F NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S CAPITELLIDAE 0.4 S GRANDIDIERELLA BON. F 1 NA S ISOPOOA W 3 NA S POLYCHAETA F NA

808 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 92 76 6.01 .11 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S COROPHIUM SPP. W 1 NA

809 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 104 85 8.62 .29 3 I FISH F 1 NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.07

810 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 98 89 7.80 .09 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

811 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 102 83 8.80 .19 2 I ISOPOOA W 3 NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S ISOPOOA W NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

812 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 106 85 10.31 .62 5 I UNIDENTIFIED NA S FISH W .38

815 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 S1 74 60 2.66 .07 I UN IOENT IF I EO 0. 01 S TANAIDACEA W NA

816 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 112 95 11.44 .23 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0. 01 S EMPTY

817 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 S1 95 77 6.39 .24 3 I TANAIDACEA W NA I UNIDENTIFIED NA S FISH W 0.03

818 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 S1 91 76 6.00 .41 4 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S COROPH IUH SPP. W 50 .18

819 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 S1 97 77 7.29 .21 3 I UNIDENTI FI ED 0.02 S FISH W 0.04

820 - 03-Har-93 MB2 S1 70 59 3.00 . 11 I UNIDENTIFIED NA S AHPHIPOOA II 2 0.01

Page 9 Appendix I Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (October 1992-May 1993, Volusia County,

Florida).

Fish NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION sITe GEAR TL SL ww GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

821 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 104 84 9.70 .29 4 I UN IDENTI F I ED 0.02 S FISH F 0.02 S SHRIMP W .10

822 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 87 70 5.05 .24 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S AMPHIPOOA W 2 NA S CAP ITELL! DAE W 2 0.06 S UNIDENTI FlED 0.01

823 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 112 93 10.85 .33 2 I UNIDENTIFIED NA S CAPITELL!DAE W 2 0.06 S POLYCHAETA F NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

824 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 108 89 9.82 .20 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

825 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 116 104 14.95 .37 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.06

826 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 91 74 5.65 .13 0 I NEMATOOA W NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S EMPTY

845 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 126 103 17.27 .41 3 I UN IDENTI F I ED 0.04 S AMPHIPOOA W 2 0.01 S TANAIDACEA F 1 NA S TANAIDACEA W 6 0.01 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

846 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 97 78 6.57 .13 2 I UNIDENTIFIED NA S FISH F 0.02 S UNIDENTIFIED NA

847 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 114 103 10.69 .34 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S SHRIMP W 0.04 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

848 - 03-Mar-93 MB2 NA 132 106 17.85 .69 4 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S PENAEIDAE W 3 .36

899 - 03-Mar-93 ZONE II 356 S1 100 81 8.06 .29 3 I POLYCHAETA F NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S SHRIMP W .10

765 - 23-Mar-93 11105 S1 121 102 10.77 .27 0 I POLYCHAETA F NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S EMPTY

766 - 23-Mar-93 '105 S1 127 106 15.36 .36 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

772 - 23-Mar-93 , 105 S1 55 44 1.29 .04 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

Page 10 Appendix I Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (October 1992-May 1993, Vol usia County,

Florida).

Fish NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN Gil SF LOCATION GUT ITEM IIfF COUNT liT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

779 + 23-Mar-93 II 105 S1 145 127 25.89 1.39 4 I POLY CHAETA F 5 NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S PORTUNIDAE II .64

784 + 23-Mar-93 BPC NA 112 94 10.03 .36 3 I POLYCHAETA F NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.06 S POLYCHAETA F S TANAIDACEA II 8 0.01 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.03

785 + 23-Mar-93 BPC NA 66 53 1.83 .07 2 I UNIDENTI F I ED NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

786 + 23-Mar-93 MB5 S1 84 69 5.02 .28 3 I POLYCHAETA 2 NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S POLYCHAETA F NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.09

787 + 23-Mar-93 MB5 S1 65 52 2.01 .08 2 I UNIDENTI FlED 0.01 S TANAIDACEA II NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

790 - 23-Mar-93 139 S1 93 76 6.20 .31 4 I POLY CHAETA F NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.05 S POLYCHAETA F 7 NA S UNIDENTI FlED .10

791 - 23-Mar-93 139 S1 112 92 10.47 .23 2 I PLANT NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S PLANT 4 0.04

792 - 23-Mar-93 139 S1 98 82 6.90 .35 4 I UNIDENTIFIED .03 S AMPHIPODA II NA S CRAB F 0.02 S UNIDENTIFIED .15

793 - 23-Mar-93 139 S1 67 55 1.96 .07 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

813 + 23-Mar-93 MB5 S1 85 70 4.n .12 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

814 + 23-Mar-93 MB5 S1 n 56 2.80 .07 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

835 + 23-Mar-93 II 105 S1 104 85 6.74 .18 0 I PORTUNIDAE II NA S EMPTY

836 + 23-Mar-93 II 105 S1 121 102 11.65 .22 I UNIDENTI F I ED NA S UNIDENTIFIED NA

837 + 23'-Mar-93 II 105 S1 101 83 7.57 .34 3 I POLYCHAETA NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S POLYCHAETA F NA

Page 11 Appendix I Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (October 1992-May 1993, Volusia County,

Florida).

Fish NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL W Gil SF LOCATION GUT ITEM IIfF COUNT liT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

S UNIDENTIFIED 0.05 838 + 23·Mar·93 tI 105 S1 117 96 11.98 .93 5 I POLYCHAETA NA

I UNIDENTIFIED 0.06 S POLYCHAETA F 25 0.02 S UNIDENTIFIED .29

839 + 23·Mar·93 tI 105 S1 129 106 15.12 .55 I EMPTY S POLYCHAETA F NA

840 + 23·Mar-93 tI 105 S1 100 82 6.76 .19 I UNIDENTIFIED NA S POLYCHAETA F 2 NA S TANAIDACEA II 1 NA

841 + 23-Mar-93 tI 105 S1 117 95 10.90 .41 0 I ISOPOOA II 1 NA I POLYCHAETA F NA I UNIDENTIFIED .11 5 EMPTY

842 + 23-Mar-93 tI 105 51 131 111 16.44 .57 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

843 + 23·Mar-93 II 105 S1 86 71 3.57 .15 0 I UNIDENTIFIED NA 5 EMPTY

844 + 23·Mar-93 tI 105 S1 55 45 .88 .00 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

849 + 23·Mar-93 tI 105 NA 107 90 8.43 .43 3 I POLYCHAETA F 6 0.05 5 AMPHIPOOA F 1 .0 5 POLYCHAETA F 5 0.07

850 + 23·Mar-93 tI 105 NA 95 81 6.26 .42 0 I AMPHIPOOA F 6 .00 I SAND 50 I UNIDENTIFIED NA 5 EMPTY

851 + 23-Mar-93 tI 105 NA 126 110 16.25 .57 2 I POLYCHAETA F 2 .00 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 5 EMPTY

852 + 23-Mar-93 tI 105 NA 126 103 16.31 .47 I AMPHIPOOA F 3 0.00 I POLYCHAETA F 3 0.03 5 AMPHIPOOA II 7 0.00 5 POLYCHAETA F 3 0.00

853 + 23-Mar-93 tI 105 NA 118 100 11.53 .33 2 I POLYCHAETA F 2 0.00 I UNIDENTIFIED NA S SHRIMP F 6 0.00

854 + 23-Mar-93 II 105 NA 120 101 14.17 .34 2 I POLYCHAETA F 2 0.04 5 PLANT 2 NA 5 POLYCHAETA F 20 0.00 5 TANAIDACEA F 7 0.00

Page 12 Appendix I Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (October 1992-May 1993, Volusia County,

Florida).

Fish NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION 5ITE GEAR TL 5L IN Gil 5F LOCATION GUT ITEM IIIF COUNT liT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

5 TANAIDACEA II 0.00 5 UNIDENTI FlED NA

855 + 23-Mar-93 tI 105 NA 113 95 10.73 .43 I POLY CHAETA F 2 0.01 5 POLYCHAETA F 1 0.02 5 TANAIDACEA F 2 0.00

857 + 23-Mar-93 tI 105 NA 104 88 8.85 .29 2 I UNIDENTIFIED NA 5 EMPTY

858 + 23-Mar-93 tI 105 NA 96 80 7.31 .39 0 I POLYCHAETA F 1 0.03 5 POLYCHAETA F 10 0.06

905 + 23-Mar-93 139 NA 104 87 7.86 .38 I UNIDENTI FlED NA S UNIDENTIFIED NA

906 + 23-Mar-93 139 S1 96 84 7.73 .31 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S POLYCHAETA NA S UN IDENTI FlED 0.04

788 - 24-Mar-93 299 S1 63 50 1.67 .16 4 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 5 FISH II 0.08

789 - 24 -Mar -93 299 S1 63 50 1.57 .09 3 I UNIDENTIFIED NA 5 FI5H F 3 0.03

794 - 24-Mar-93 058 S1 64 51 1.80 .10 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 5 AMPHIPOOA II 2 NA 5 INSECTA F 1 NA

795 + 24·Mar-93 047 51 64 50 1.86 .09 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 5 FISH II 4 0.02

796 + 24-Mar-93 047 51 77 62 3.01 .14 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 5 UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

797 + 24-Mar-93 047 51 61 50 1.68 .14 4 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.04 5 AMPHIPOOA II 2 NA 5 COROPHIUM SPP. II 4 0.03 5 FISH II 17 0.03

798 + 24-Mar-93 047 51 70 58 2.13 . 17 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 5 COROPHIUM SPP. II 3 NA 5 FISH II 1 0.05 5 TANAIDACEA II 2 NA

827 - 24-Mar-93 1482 S1 144 119 22.14 1.27 5 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S FISH II 0.09 S PLANT 0.01 S PORTUNIDAE II .56

828 - 24-Mar-93 1482 S1 130 108 16.75 14.75 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S SHRIMP F 3 0.01

829 - 24-Mar-93 M82 S1 138 117 21.66 .59 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.06 S ISOPOOA II NA

Page 13 Appendix I Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (October 1992-May 1993, Vol usia County,

Florida).

Fish NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GU SF LOCATION GUT ITEM U/F COUNT UT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 830 - 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 149 123 25.68 .87 2 I UNIDENTIFIED .32

S UNIDENTIFIED .10 831 - 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 126 103 14.36 .85 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.07

S UNIDENTIFIED .23 832 - 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 80 66 4.03 .18 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

S EMPTY 833 - 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 92 76 5.88 .20 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

S EMPTY 834 - 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 94 78 6.66 .55 5 I UNIDENTIFIED NA

S PENAEIDAE W .34 859 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 109 89 9.17 .24 0 I EMPTY

S EMPTY 860 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 114 96 11.94 .40 4 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

S FISH U .14 861 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 52 43 1.08 .04 0 I UNIDENTIFIED NA

S EMPTY 862 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 131 107 17.24 .51 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

S UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 863 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 143 119 19.59 .54 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

S EMPTY 864 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 71 56 2.28 .09 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 865 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 104 84 8.20 .19 I UN IDENTI FI ED NA

S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 866 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 101 83 7.30 .18 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

S UNIDENTIFIED NA 867 + 24 -Mar-93 MB2 S1 117 97 11.67 .24 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03

S PLANT NA S UNIDENTIFIED NA

868 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 102 83 7.42 .26 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.04 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.03

869 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 115 93 10.89 .29 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0. 01 S EMPTY

871 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 97 115 11.52 .22 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

872 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 121 99 12.09 .26 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

873 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 97 80 7.57 .18 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

Page 14 Appendix I Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (October 1992-May 1993, Vol usia County,

Florida) .

Fish NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE G~AR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

874 + 24·Mar-93 MB2 S1 137 114 19.04 .36 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

875 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 110 91 7.93 .22 3 I UNIDENTIFIED NA S FISH W 1 0.04

876 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 100 83 7.46 .18 1 S MYSIDACEA W 1 NA 8n + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 61 50 1.61 .06 3 I UNIDENTIFIED NA

S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 878 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 106 87 8.37 .19 0 I EMPTY

S EMPTY 879 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 105 87 8.68 .15 0 I EMPTY

S EMPTY 880 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 67 56 1.98 .12 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

S UN IDENTI FlED 0.01 881 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 58 46 1.11 .09 5 I UNIDENTIFIED NA

S CAPITELLIDAE W 0.01 S FISH W 0.05

882 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 70 58 2.53 .11 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

883 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 108 87 11.n .21 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 5 PLANT 0.02

884 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 84 69 5.10 .12 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S EMPTY

885 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 78 63 4.12 .17 2 I UNIDENTIFIED NA S AMPHIPOOA W 0.01 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

886 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 51 89 73 5.64 .16 0 I EMPTY 5 EMPTY

887 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 66 56 2.42 .13 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

888 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 129 107 17.12 1.00 4 I UNIDENTIFIED .15 S FISH F 2 .30 5 TANAIDACEA W 1 NA

889 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 51 121 100 13.46 .37 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.05 S EMPTY

890 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 51 90 73 5.73 .16 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.04 S EMPTY

891 + 24-Mar-93 058 S1 68 54 2.16 .09 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

892 + 24-Mar-93 058 S1 76 54 1.98 .04 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S

Page 15 Appendix I Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (October 1992-May 1993, Volusia County,

Florida).

Fish NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL W GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F CruNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

893 + 24-Mar-93 058 S1 57 45 1.29 _06 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S AMPHIPOOA W 2 NA S COROPH I UM SPP. W 1 NA

894 + 24-Mar-93 058 S1 58 46 1.08 .10 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S UN IDENTI F I ED 0.02

895 + 24-Mar-93 058 S1 70 56 2.45 .09 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S COROPHIUM SPP. W 1 NA S GRANOIDIERELLA BON. W 2 0.01

896 + 24-Mar-93 058 S1 63 52 1.78 .09 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S AMPHIPOOA F 3 NA S AMPHIPOOA W 3 NA

897 + 24-Mar-93 299 S1 114 93 11.06 .n 5 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S CARIDEA W 1 0.01 S FISH W 4 .31

898 + 24-Mar-93 058 S1 67 53 2.06 .10 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0. 02 S FISH W 31 0.01

902 + 24-Mar-93 299 S1 103 86 8.28 .21 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S SHRIMP W 0.04

903 + 24-Mar-93 299 S1 66 52 2.19 .22 5 I UNIDENTI FlED 0.01 S FISH W .12

904 + 24-Mar-93 299 S1 54 43 1.05 .09 4 I UNIDENTIFIED NA S FISH W 0.03

907 + 24-Mar-93 058 S1 68 55 2.22 .10 4 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S AMPHIPOOA W 11 0.03

908 + 24-Mar-93 058 S1 111 90 9.14 .24 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0. 02 S FISH F 0.02

909 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 103 82 7.37 .19 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

910 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 126 98 15.21 .42 2 I EMPTY S AMPHI POOA W NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

911 + 24·Mar-93 MB2 NA 93 79 5.94 .25 2 I AMPHI POOA F 7 0.00 I POLYCHAETA F 1 0.01 S EMPTY

912 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 NA 83 68 4.70 .14 I UNIDENTI FlED 0.00 S EMPTY

913 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 130 107 14.06 .33 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S COROPH IUM SPP. W 3 0.01 S PLANT 1 NA

914 + 24-Mar-93 MB2 S1 105 86 8.51 .13 0 I POLYCHAETA F 1 NA I UNIDENTIFIED NA

Page 16 Appendix I Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (October 1992-May 1993, Vol usia County,

Florida).

Fish NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL W Gil SF LOCATION GUT ITEM II/F COUNT liT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

S EMPTY 915 + 24 -Mar-93 1482 S1 114 94 10.16 .19 0 I EMPTY

S EMPTY 916 + 24-Mar-93 1482 S1 65 53 1.96 .08 5 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

S FISH II 0.08 917 + 24-Mar-93 1482 S1 93 77 5.14 .14 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

S EMPTY 918 + 24-Mar-93 1482 S1 118 96 12.74 .28 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

S EMPTY 919 + 24-Mar-93 1482 S1 124 103 11.22 .41 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

S EMPTY 920 + 24-Mar-93 1482 S1 109 90 10.03 .26 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

S EMPTY 921 + 24-Mar-93 1482 S1 99 81 8.36 .13 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

S EMPTY 922 + 24-Mar-93 1482 S1 93 75 6.52 .31 4 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03

S UNIDENTIFIED .13 923 + 24-Mar-93 1482 S1 122 111 13.87 .38 I UNIDENTIFIED NA

S UNIDENTIFIED NA 924 + 24-Mar-93 1482 S1 111 83 9.06 .34 2 I UNIDENTIFIED NA

S CARIDEA II NA S UNIDENTIFIED NA

925 - 24-Mar-93 1482 S1 147 126 18.34 .61 I EMPTY S POLYCHAETA NA

926 + 24-Mar-93 1482 S1 119 108 13.43 .29 I UNIDENTIFIED NA S UNIDENTIFIED NA

927 + 24-Mar-93 1482 NA 77 63 3.74 .13 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

928 + 24-Mar-93 1482 NA 115 97 9.60 .34 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

929 + 24-Mar-93 1482 S1 105 86 8.45 .41 4 I UN IDENTI F I ED NA S FISH F .16

930 + 24-Mar-93 1482 S1 93 81 5.51 .39 2 I UNIDENTIFIED NA S TANAIDACEA F 1 NA

799 + 31-Mar-93 MH NA 134 110 16.38 .50 I INSECTA F 3 NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

800 - 31-Mar-93 MH NA 242 196 123.09 3.72 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.07 S EMPTY

803 - 31-Mar-93 GRID tI 187 NA 108 88 9.48 .44 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.09

Page 17 Appendix I Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (October 1992-May 1993, Vol usia County,

Florida).

Fish NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

804 - 31-Mar-93 MA NA 86 70 4.15 .24 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S FISH F NA S INSECTA F NA S UNIDENTI FlED 0.03

767 + 01-Apr-93 MB2 S1 122 116 13.76 .18 3 I GRANDIDIERELLA BON. F 8 NA I PLANT 1 NA I TANAIDACEA F 2 NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.08 S AMPHIPODA W NA S TANAIDACEA F NA S UNIDENTI F I ED 0.03

768 + 01-Apr-93 MB2 S1 124 112 12.76 .31 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S NEREIDAE W 0.02 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

769 + 01-Apr-93 MB2 S1 153 133 27.48 59.00 0 I TANAIDACEA F 3 NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.05

no + 01-Apr-93 MB2 S1 134 113 15.55 .42 I POLYCHAETA F NA S POLYCHAETA F NA S UNIDENTIFIED O. 02

n1 + 01-Apr-93 MB2 S1 128 116 15.37 .32 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S UNIDENTIFIED NA

m + 01-Apr-93 MB2 S1 122 103 12.78 .58 4 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.04 S COROPHIUM SPP. W 11 0.03 S FISH F 2 0.09

n4 + 01-Apr-93 MB2 S1 125 105 13.42 .25 I UNIDENTIFIED NA S MYSIDACEA W NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

775 + 01-Apr-93 MB2 S1 115 96 10.00 73.00 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S FISH F 1 .35

n6 + 01-Apr-93 MB2 S1 124 102 12.13 .21 I INSECTA F 1 NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S POLYCHAETA F NA S UNIDENTIFIED NA

m + 01-Apr-93 MB2 S1 118 99 11.92 .42 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.04 S EMPTY

n8 + 01-Apr-93 MB2 S1 128 115 14.75 .38 I INSECTA F 1 NA I TANAIDACEA W 1 NA I UNIDENTIFIED NA S INSECTA F 1 NA S MYSIDACEA W 3 NA

APPENDIX II

BISHOP HARBOR RED DRUM GUT ANALYSIS DATA

Appendix II Table 1. Red drum gut analysis data (September I992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa Bay).

FISH NO. TAG ~ATE COLbECIION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM WLF COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

66 - Q4-Noy-92 MUDDY HOLE SS 27 22 .16 .01 4 I UN IDENTI F I ED S MYSIDACEA W 2

67 - Q4-Noy-92 MUDDY HOLE SS 30 23 .21 .01 3 I MYSIDACEA S MYSIDACEA W 3

68 - 04-Noy-92 MUDDY HOLE SS 32 25 .23 .02 5 I CRUSTACEA F 5 S MYSIDACEA W 3

69 - 04-Noy-92 MUDDY HOLE SS 23 18 .10 .01 5 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W 4

70 - 04-Noy-92 MUDDY HOLE SS 25 20 .14 .01 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA F 2

71 - 04-Noy-92 MUDDY HOLE SS 29 23 .20 .01 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W 3

n - 04-Noy-92 MUDDY HOLE SS 25 20 .14 .01 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W 2

73 - 04-Noy-92 MUDDY HOLE SS 31 23 .22 .01 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA F 2 S MYSIDACEA W 3

74 - 04-Noy-92 MUDDY HOLE SS 32 25 .26 .01 2 S AMPHIPOOA W 2 S MYSIDACEA W 2 S UNIDENTIFIED

415 - 04-Noy-92 GRID , 91 26 18 .13 .00 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA F 1 S MYSIDACEA W 1

75 - 17-Noy-92 SS 535 3450.00 I XANTHIDAE F 50 S CALLINECTES SPP. F 9 S PLANT 1 S POLYCHAETA W 1 S XANTHIDAE F

76 - 17-Noy-92 SS 385 1450.00 3 I CRAB F 2 S PENAEUS SPP. W 1 S SHRIMP F 2

392 - 18-Noy-92 MUDDY HOLE 43 35 .64 .04 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F

393 - 18-Noy-92 MUDDY HOLE 46 37 .68 .02 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA F

394 - 18-Noy-92 MUDDY HOLE 41 32 .46 .01 0 I AMPHIPOOA F I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

416 - 18-Noy-92 GRID' 91 29 23 .18 .00 5 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W

417 - 18-Noy-92 GRID , 91 45 36 .53 .03 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA F 1 S MYSIDACEA W 2

Page 2 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN Glol SF LOCATION GUT ITEM WfF COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

467 - 18-Noy-92 GRID 25 ZONE 3 60 49 1.64 .05 2 I AMPHIPODA F 50 S CRUSTACEA F 47 0.0 S MYSIDACEA 101 1

468 - 18-Noy-92 GRID 25 ZONE 3 62 51 1.93 .07 3 I AMPHIPODA F 13 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA F 32 .01 S AMPHIPODA 101 2 .01 S COROPHIUM SPP. 101 1 S MYSIDACEA 101 4 .01

469 - 18-Noy-92 GRID 25 ZONE 3 32 26 .35 .00 4 I AMPHIPODA F 5 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPELI SCA SPP. 101 1 S AMPHIPODA F 4 0.0 S AMPHIPODA 101 4 0.0 S CRUSTACEA F 6 0.0

470 - 18-Noy-92 GRID 25 ZONE 3 36 29 .38 .01 3 I AMPHIPODA F 15 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA 101 1 0.0 S CRUSTACEA 101 2 0.0

n - 23-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE SS 144 119 24.45 1.60 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S lCANTHIDAE 101 .4

78 + 23-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE SS 153 126 27.80 1.26 I EMPTY S CRAB F 5 .04 S PLANT 3

79 + 23-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE SS 225 190 96.07 3.58 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

80 + 23-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE SS 166 139 35.32 1.75 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S CALLINECTES SPP. 101 1 .41

81 + 23-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE SS 204 167 59.28 1.81 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

82 + 23-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE 5S 185 153 46.92 1.18 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

83 - 23-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE SS 180 145 45.n 2.29 0 I AMPHIPOOA 101 4 .41 S EMPTY

84 - 23-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE SS 197 165 60.27 1.82 0 S EMPTY 85 + 23-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE SS 156 131 30.53 .92 1 I AMPHIPODA 101 50 .00

S MYSIDACEA 101 1 86 + 23-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE SS 134 109 18.99 .79 I CRUSTACEA F 50 .5

S AMPHIPODA F 8 .02 466 U 24-Noy-92 310 300.25 7.14 2 I CRUSTACEA F 41 .13

I UNIDENTIFIED

Page 3 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data {September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay} .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL W GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

S EMPTY 307 + 25'Noy-92 RELEASE SITE S 176 147 34.86 1.56 2 I UNIDENTIFIED

S CRAB F 6 .06 S UNIDENTIFIED

308 + 25-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE S 127 106 14.85 .55 2 I CRAB 4 .02 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 1 S CRAB F 6 .03 S UNIDENTIFIED

309 + 25-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE S 162 133 28.36 1.22 4 I CRAB 8 .08 I UNIDENTIFIED S CALLINECTES SPP. W 1 .32 S CRAB F 3

310 + 25-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE S 131 108 16.87 .83 4 I CRAB F 1 I UNIDENTIFIED S CALLINECTES SPP. W 1 .21 S PORTUNIDAE W 2

311 + 25-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE S 115 94 11.48 .37 I CRAB F 1 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA W S CRAB F S PLANT

312 + 25-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE S 133 111 17.61 .57 2 I UNIDENTIFIED F S AMPHIPOOA W 4 .01 S UNIDENTI FlED

313 - 25-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE S 129 103 16.14 .42 I AMPHIPOOA F 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA W

314 + 25 -Noy-92 RELEASE SITE S 141 114 20.84 2.78 5 I PLANT I UNIDENTIFIED S CRAB W .46 S FISH W 1.50 44 S PLANT

315 + 25-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE S 132 107 17.35 .54 0 I MYSIDACEA W I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

316 + 25-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE S 131 104 14.95 .99 I CRAB F 9 .03 I OSTRACOOA 1 I PLANT 1 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA W 9

Page 4 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN Gil SF LOCATION GUT ITEM II/F COUNT liT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

S CRAB II 1 .24 S PLANT 1

375 - 25·Noy-92 RELEASE SITE 58 43 1.20 .11 3 I AMPHI POOA F 1 S AMPHI POOA II 2 S MYSIDACEA II 5 S UN I DENTI F I ED

376 - 25-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE n 57 2.60 .32 2 I UN I DENTI F I ED S AMPHIPOOA II 1 S MYSIDACEA II 8 .01

3n - 25·NoY-92 RELEASE SITE 55 42 1.02 .07 2 I UNIDENT IFIED S AMPHIPOOA II 8 .03 S MYSIDACEA II 3

378 - 25-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE 60 49 1.33 .12 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA II 3 S FISH II 1 .03 13 S UNIDENTIFIED

379 · 25-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE 50 39 .69 .04 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA II 4 S UNIDENTIFIED S UNIDENTIFIED II 7

380 · 25-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE 63 49 1.50 .07 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA II 4 S UNIDENTIFIED

381 · 25·Noy-92 RELEASE SITE 63 48 1.48 .08 4 I UN I DENTI F I ED S AMPHIPOOA II 4 S MYSIDACEA II 7 .01

382 · 25-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE 61 47 1.51 .10 4 I UN I DENTI F I ED S AMPHI POOA II 13 .03 S SHRIMP II 1 .01 4

383 - 25-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE 50 39 .85 .05 3 I UNIDENTI FlED S MYSIDACEA II 3 S UNIDENTIFIED

384 · 25-NoY-92 RELEASE SITE 48 38 .75 .04 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 14 .02

385 - 25-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE 53 38 1.11 .11 3 S AMPHIPOOA II 1 S UNIDENTIFIED F 6 .01 S UNIDENTIFIED II 14 .04

386 - 25·Noy-92 RELEASE SITE 58 47 1.41 .09 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 5 S AMPHIPOOA II 2

Page 5 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL ww GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

387 - 25-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE 46 36 .63 _02 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S CRUSTACEA F 3 S MYSIDACEA W 13 _02

388 - 25-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE 48 38 _65 _03 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W 4

389 - 25-Noy-92 RELEASE SITE 46 36 .58 _04 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA W S MYSIDACEA W

317 + 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 134 105 20.66 1.31 4 I PLANT 9 I UNIDENT IF I ED F S AMPHIPOOA F 50 .22 S AMPHIPOOA W 50 .22

318 + 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 126 100 15.81 .79 3 I UNIDENTI F I ED S AMPHI POOA W 7 .03 S UNIDENTIFIED

319 - 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 165 126 34.37 1.79 3 I AMPHIPOOA F 100 .33 I PLANT 1 S AMPHIPOOA W 2 S AMPHI POOA W 30 .09 S COROPH IUM SPP. F 100 .09

320 + 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 131 105 17.68 .94 3 I POLYCHAETA F S AMPELISCA SPP. W 2 S AMPHIPOOA W 10 .04 S MYSIDACEA W 8 .03 S POLYCHAETA F

321 - 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 142 115 24.38 .99 3 I UNIDENTI FlED S AMPELI SCA SPP. W 5 S AMPHIPOOA W 21 .04

322 + 03 -Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 127 103 15.38 .69 2 I UN IDENTI F I ED S AMPHI POOA W 4 S UNIDENTIFIED

323 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 134 116 21.83 1.08 3 I UN !DENTI F I ED S AMPHI POOA F S CRAB F 4 S POLYCHAETA F 1

324 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 163 126 33.51 1.63 3 S UNIDENTI F I ED F -325 + 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 199 164 67.90 1.92 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

326 + 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 136 108 18 . 19 .89 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S SHRIMP W 1 .11

Page 6 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN Gil SF LOCATION GUT ITEM II/F COUNT liT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

327 + 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 139 114 21.52 1.03 3 I UNIDENTIFIED F S AMPHIPODA F 50 .20 S UNIDENTIFIED

328 + 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 137 109 18.n 1.12 3 I PLANT I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 50 . 12 S AMPHIPOOA II 18 .06 S PLANT 1 .10 S UN IDENTI F I ED

329 + 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 184 151 45.97 1.75 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

330 + 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 137 109 20.41 .92 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S UNIDENTIFIED

331 + 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 131 104 8.22 .83 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S UNIDENTIFIED

332 - 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 121 103 15.65 .85 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA II 4

370 - 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 140 115 19.89 1.21 3 I AMPHIPOOA II 1 I CRAB II 1 .05 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA II 15 .04 S CRAB II 4 .27

371 - 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 169 132 34.56 1.31 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA II

372 + 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 137 111 18.01 1.09 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPE LI SCA SPP. II 13 S COROPHIUM SPP. II 21 S UNIDENTIFIED

395 - 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 54 44 1.11 .07 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA II 1 S MYSIDACEA II 3 S UNIDENTIFIED

396 - 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 55 43 1.37 .04 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA F 2 S MYSIDACEA II 6 S UNIDENTIFIED

397 - 03-Dec-92 RELEASe' SITE 54 42 1.27 .13 5 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA II 2 S SHRIMP II 3 .09

398 - 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 64 50 2.03 .12 4 I UNIDENTI F I ED S MYSIDACEA F 20 MA

Page 7 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL ww GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

S MYSIDACEA W 8 399 - 03-Dec-92 RElEASE SITE 53 41 1.07 .05 3 I UNIDENTIFIED

S MYSIDACEA F 10 S MYSIDACEA W 6

400 U 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SI TE 66 51 2.19 .09 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA F 7 S SHRIMP W 1 .01

401 U 03-Dec-92 RElEASE SITE 65 50 2.15 .12 3 I OSTRACODA 1 I PLANT 1 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA F 14 S AMPHIPODA W 4 S MYSIDACEA W 2

402 U 03-Dec-92 RElEASE SITE 49 39 .96 .03 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S UNIDENTIFIED

403 U 03 -Dec-92 RElEASE SITE 49 37 .88 .04 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S UNIDENTIFIED

404 U 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 45 35 .63 .01 0 I AMPHIPODA F S EMPTY

405 - 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 42 32 .50 .03 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W 2 S UNIDENTIFIED

406 - 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 51 39 1.17 .10 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W 9 .03

407 - 03-Dec-92 RElEASE SITE 52 39 1.08 .09 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA W 3 S UNIDENTIFIED

408 - 03-Dec-92 RElEASE SITE 54 43 1.15 .04 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S UNIDENTIFIED

409 - 03-Dec-92 RElEASE SITE 44 34 .60 .03 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA F 2 S MYSIDACEA W 2

410 - 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 43 33 .64 .04 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W S SAND

411 - 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 50 39 .99 .05 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W S UNIDENTIFIED

412 - 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 44 34 .60 .02 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

Page 8 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

413 - 03-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 48 38 .83 .04 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W 4

414 - 03-Dec -92 RELEASE SITE 47 37 .64 .04 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W 8 .01 S UNIDENTIFIED

486 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 42 32 .48 .05 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S SHRIMP W .02 S UNIDENTifiED

487 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 46 36 .56 .02 2 I UNIDENTifiED S UNIDENTifiED

488 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 52 42 .88 .04 3 I POLYCHAETA 7 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 2 S AMPHIPOOA W 1 S MYSIDACEA W 8 S PLANT 1 S UNIDENTIFIED

489 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 53 42 .84 .05 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 7 S AMPHIPOOA W 3

490 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 43 38 .64 .04 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA W 7

491 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 51 41 1.13 .04 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F S UNIDENTIFIED

492 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 46 37 .n .03 3 I UNIDENTI FlED S AMPHIPOOA W 2 S MYSIDACEA W 1

493 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 44 34 .57 .02 2 I UN IDENT If I ED S AMPHIPOOA W 4 S MYSIDACEA W 1

494 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE 43 33 .61 .03 3 I UNIDENTifiED S AMPHIPOOA F 6 S AMPHIPOOA W 1

496 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE BY ROAD - 58 47 1.30 .04 2 I AI'IIPHIPOOA F 1 I CRUSTACEA F 5 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 1 S AMPHIPOOA F 50 0.0 S AMPHIPOOA W 5 S COROPH IUM SPP. W 1 0.0

Page 9 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL W GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM WfF COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

S CRUSTACEA F 24 0.0 497 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE BY ROAD - 39 31 .42 .03 3 I AMPHIPOOA F 7

I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 12 0.0 S AMPHIPOOA W 2 0.0 S PLANT 1

498 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE BY ROAD - 50 41 .90 .03 2 I AMPHIPOOA F 9 I AMPHIPOOA W 1 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 4 0.0 S AMPHIPOOA W 6 0.0 S MYSIDACEA W 1 0.0

499 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE BY ROAD - 47 38 .80 .06 3 I AMPHI POOA F 12 I AMPHI POOA W 1 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHI POOA F 22 0.0 S AMPHIPOOA W 5 0.0 S MYSIDACEA W 2 0.0

500 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE BY ROAD - 49 40 .66 .02 I AMPHIPOOA F 4 I POLYCHAETA F 19 I SAND I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 16 0.0 S AMPHIPOOA W 2 0.0 S MYSIDACEA W 1 0.0 S PLANT 1 S POLY CHAETA F 15 S SAND S UNIDENTIFIED

501 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE BY ROAD - 43 35 .62 .04 2 I AMPHIPOOA F 12 0.0 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPELI SCA SPP. W 2 0.0 S AMPHIPOOA F 9 0.0 S AMPHIPOOA W 2 0.0

502 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE BY ROAD - 42 35 .56 .00 I UNIDENTIFIED S UNIDENTIFIED

503 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE BY ROAD - 47 38 .69 .02 2 I AMPHIPOOA F 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 8 S CRUSTACEA F 3 S MYSIDACEA W 2

Page 10 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

S POLYCHAETA W 1 504 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE BY ROAD - 48 38 .83 .00 3 I AMPHIPOOA F 21 0.0

I PLANT 1 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHI POOA F 8 0.0 S AMPHI POOA W 2 0.0 S CRUSTACEA F 2 0.0 S MYSIDACEA W 3 0.0

505 - 14-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE BY ROAD - 57 48 1.26 .05 3 I AMPHIPOOA F 20 0.0 I AMPHIPOOA W 1 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 20 0.0 S AMPHIPOOA W 1 0.0 S MYSIDACEA W 1 0.0 S UN I DENTI F I ED

87 - 18-Dec-92 GRID NEXT TO tin SS 82 65 4.52 .43 3 S AMPHIPOOA F 50 .15 S AMPHIPOOA W 26 .07

88 - 18-Dec-92 GRID NEXT TO tin SS 94 75 6.68 .31 2 * AMPHIPOOA F 100 .27 * AMPHIPOOA W 17 .03 * PLANT 2 .01

89 - 18-Dec-92 GRID NEXT TO tin SS 83 65 4.53 .50 3 * AMPHIPOOA 50 .47 * AMPHIPOOA W 21 .03

90 - 18-Dec-92 CANAL AT MUDDY HOLE 48 37 .96 .06 3 * AMPHIPOOA F 9 .00 * AMPHIPOOA W 6 .00 * PLANT 2 .00

91 - 18-Dec-92 CANAL AT MUDDY HOLE 51 40 1.12 .05 4 S AMPHIPOOA F 13 .01 S AMPHIPOOA W 8 .02

92 - 18-Dec-92 CANAL AT MUDDY HOLE 31 29 .40 .02 4 S MYSIDACEA F 4 S MYSIDACEA W 7

93 - 18-Dec-92 CANAL AT MUDDY HOLE 33 26 .32 .01 3 * AMPHIPOOA W 1 * MYSIDACEA F 6 * MYSIDACEA W 1

94 - 18-Dec-92 CANAL AT MUDDY HOLE 41 33 .58 .01 3 S MYSIDACEA F 9 S MYSIDACEA W 11

95 - 18-Dec-92 CANAL AT MUDDY HOLE 44 35 .71 .04 2 S AMPHIPOOA W 6 .02 S PLANT 1

96 - 18-Dec-92 CANAL AT MUDDY HOLE 54 42 1.39 .04 3 I POLYCHAETA F I UN I DENTI F I ED S AMPHIPOOA W 2 .00 S POLYCHAETA F S SAND

Page 11 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

S UNIDENTIFIED W 5 .01 97 - 18-Dec-92 CANAL AT MUDDY HOLE SS 56 42 1.61 .07 4 I POLYCHAETA F

S AMPHIPOOA F 8 .00 S AMPHIPOOA W 4 .00 S POLYCHAETA F

98 - 18-Dec-92 CANAL AT MUDDY HOLE SS 78 63 3.43 .12 4 AMPHIPOOA W 14 .02 POLYCHAETA W 1 . 00

S MYSIDACEA W 2 99 - 18-Dec-92 CANAL AT MUDDY HOLE SS 64 51 1.75 . 09 3 I AMPHIPOOA F

I PLANT 2 S AMPHIPOOA W 8 .02

100 - 18-Dec-92 CANAL AT MUDDY HOLE SS 72 58 2.73 .08 3 I PLANT 1 S AMPHIPOOA F 3 S AMPHIPOOA W 7 .05 S MYSIDACEA F 2

101 - 18-Dec-92 CANAL AT MUDDY HOLE SS 68 54 2.27 .16 4 I AMPHIPOOA F 25 .01 I AMPHIPOOA W 20 . 02 S MYSIDACEA W 1

102 - 18-Dec-92 CANAL AT MUDDY HOLE SS 63 49 1.90 .10 4 I AMPHIPOOA F 25 .01 S AMPHIPOOA F S MYSIDACEA W 15 .01

103 - 18-Dec-92 CANAL AT MUDDY HOLE SS 57 46 1.39 .06 4 S AMPHIPOOA W 6 S CRUSTACEA W 4

104 - 18-Dec-92 CANAL AT MUDDY HOLE SS 42 35 .58 .04 3 I AMPHIPOOA F 8 .01 S AMPHIPOOA W 11 .02

105 - 18-Dec-92 CANAL AT MUDDY HOLE SS 42 34 .56 .03 4 I AMPHIPOOA F S AMPHIPOOA F 10 S AMPHIPOOA W 8 .02

106 - 18-Dec-92 CANAL AT MUDDY HOLE SS 59 46 1.64 .03 1 S AMPHIPOOA W 4 107 - 18-Dec-92 GRID 191 SS 46 32 .95 .07 5 I UNIDENTIFIED

S AMPHIPOOA W 2 S MYSIDACEA W 6 .03

108 - 18-Dec-92 GRID 191 SS 48 38 1.04 .06 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA W 3 S MYSIDACEA W 7 .03

109 - 18-Dec-92 GRID 191 SS 42 34 .63 .03 3 I CRUSTACEA F 18 S MYSIDACEA W 11 .01

110 - 18-Dec-92 GRID 191 SS 49 38 .90 .03 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W 6 .01 S PLANT 1

Page 12 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM IJIF COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

111 - 18-Dec-92 GRID #91 SS 61 50 2.05 .11 4 I POLYCHAETA I UNIDENTI F I ED S AMPHIPOOA W 2 S CRUSTACEA W 18 .02

112 - 18-Dec-92 GRID #91 SS 44 33 .74 .06 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W 10 .03

113 - 18-Dec-92 GRID #91 SS 49 39 1.01 .04 2 I UNIDENTI FlED S AMPHIPOOA F 4 S AMPHIPOOA W 3 S CRUSTACEA F 4 S CRUSTACEA W 2

114 - 18-Dec-92 GRID #91 SS 48 38 .91 .04 3 I UN IDENTI F I ED S AMPHIPOOA W 2 S MYSIDACEA F 10 .03

115 - 18-Dec-92 GRID #91 SS 59 48 1.68 .05 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S CRUSTACEA F 2 S MYSIDACEA W 7 .02

116 - 18-Dec-92 GRID #91 SS 61 49 1.66 .09 4 I AMPHIPOOA F 5 .01 S AMPHIPOOA W 1 S MYSIDACEA W 9 .03

117 - 18-Dec-92 GRID #91 68 52 2.17 .33 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA F 5 S MYSIDACEA W 7 .28

118 - 18-Dec-92 GRID #91 n 64 3.37 .47 5 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 8 S AMPHIPOOA W 11 .04 S MYSIDACEA F 27 .01 S MYSIDACEA W 20 .04 S PLANT 1

119 - 18-Dec-92 GRID #91 69 55 2.34 .22 3 S AMPHIPOOA F 4 S AMPHIPOOA W 7 S MYSIDACEA F 6 S MYSIDACEA W 4 S UNIDENTIFIED

120 - 18-Dec-92 GRID #91 64 51 1.74 .07 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA W 2 S MYSIDACEA W .04

121 - 18-Dec-92 GRID #91 62 50 1.66 .19 3 S AMPHIPOOA F 2 S MYSIDACEA W 7 .02

122 - 18-Dec-92 GRID #91 58 47 1.45 .23 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W 20 .22

Page 13 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM WfF COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

123 - 18-Dec-92 GRID #91 47 39 .78 .20 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA W 2 S FISH \I 1 3 S MYSIDACEA \I 5

124 - 18-Dec-92 GRID #91 61 49 1.65 .06 4 I AMPHI PODA \I 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHI PODA F 4 .01 S AMPHIPODA \I 1 S MYSIDACEA W 6

125 - 18-Dec-92 GRID #91 55 44 1.16 .04 3 I AMPHIPODA F I PLANT I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA II 9

126 - 18-Dec-92 GRID #91 52 41 .92 .02 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA F 5 S MYSIDACEA W 4

257 + 18-Dec-92 GRID #20 186 147 39.86 1.40 I FISH F 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S FISH F

297 - 18-Dec-92 CANAL AT MUDDY HOLE SS 59 47 1.55 .04 4 S AMPHIPODA II 11 .04 S PLANT 4 S POLY CHAETA F

127 21-Dec-92 GRID #60;OFFSHORE Z4 316 28.13 4 I CRAB F 100 3.04 I UNIDENTIFIED S CALLINECTES SPP. F 4 1.34 S CALLINECTES SPP. II 1 5.19

129 - 24-Dec-92 RELEASE SI TE 40 34 .69 .04 3 I AMPHIPOOA F S AMPHIPOOA F 3 S AMPHIPODA II 7 .01

130 - 24-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE CULVERT 46 36 .70 .05 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA F 10 S AMPHIPODA II 15 .01 S MOLLUSCA II 1

131 - 24-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE CULVERT 68 54 2.15 .11 3 PLANT 1 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHI PODA 28 .02

132 - 24-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE CULVERT 47 38 .89 .07 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPELISCA SPP. II 2 S AMPHIPODA F 10 S AMPHIPODA W 4 .01

Page 14 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL W Glol SF LOCATION GUT ITEM IoI/F COUNT IoIT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

133 - 24-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE CULVERT 59 47 1.52 .09 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA F 41 S AMPHIPODA 101 2

134 - 24-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE CULVERT 48 38 .91 .06 4 I NEMATODA 101

I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPE LI SCA SPP. 101 2 S AMPHIPODA 101 2 S CRUSTACEA F 18

135 - 24-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE CULVERT 49 39 .86 .04 3 I AMPHIPODA F S AMPHIPODA F 12 S AMPHIPODA 101 7

136 - 24-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE CULVERT 61 49 1.41 .08 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA F 17 .01 S AMPHIPODA 101 5 .01

137 - 24-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE CULVERT 48 39 1.00 .07 4 I AMPHI PODA F I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA F 30 .01 S AMPHI PODA 101 1

138 - 24-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE CULVERT 49 39 .98 .06 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA F 8 S AMPHIPOOA 101 10 .02 S MYSIDACEA F 2 S PLANT 1

139 - 24-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE CULVERT 45 35 .76 .05 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA F 14 .02 S AMPHIPODA 101 1

140 - 24-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE CULVERT 47 37 .88 .05 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA F 18 .01

141 - 24-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE CULVERT 42 32 .58 .03 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA F 19 .01

142 - 24-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE CULVERT 46 35 .79 .04 4 I AMPHIPODA F 10 S AMPHI PODA 101 2

143 - 24-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE CULVERT 48 34 .77 .06 4 I EMPTY S AMPHIPODA F 20 S AMPHIPODA 101 1

144 - 24-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE CULVERT 51 40 1.10 .08 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 33 .02

145 - 24-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE CULVERT 48 38 .92 .02 3 AMPHIPOOA F 18 146 - 24-Dec-92 RELEASE SITE CULVERT 40 31 .61 .04 AMPHIPOOA F 12

AMPHIPOOA 101 1

Page 15 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

147 - 28-Dec-92 Z2 GRID #20 ss 82 67 4.60 .32 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHI PODA F 9 S COROPHIUM SPP. W 20 .05 S CRUSTACEA F 2 S PLANT 1 S POLYCHAETA F S TANAIDACEA W 5

148 - 28-Dec-92 Z2 GRID #20 SS 66 54 2.44 .12 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA F 62 S COROPH IUM SPP. W 2 S CRUSTACEA F 2 S MYSIDACEA W 3

149 - 28-Dec-92 Z2 GRID #20 ss 65 53 2.29 .13 3 I EMPTY S AMPHIPODA F 58 .03 S COROPHIUM SPP. W 5 S MYSIDACEA W 2 S PLANT 1 S TANAIDACEA 3

150 - 28-Dec-92 Z2 GRID #20 ss 69 59 2.57 .21 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 24 S COROP H IUM SPP. W 10 S PLANT 1 S POLYCHAETA

151 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE #4 46 37 .96 .06 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA W 2 S MYSIDACEA W 3 .01

152 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE #4 47 37 1.00 .05 2 I UN IDENTI F I ED S AMPHIPODA W 1 S CRUSTACEA F 5 S CRUSTACEA W 3

153 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE #4 50 40 1.14 .06 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA F 15 .01 S CRUSTACEA W 5

154 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE #4 45 37 .86 .05 4 S CRUSTACEA F 19 .01 S CRUSTACEA W 5 .01 S PLANT 1

155 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE #4 52 42 1.33 .06 3 S CRUSTACEA W 4 S PLANT

156 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE #4 65 54 2. 21 .05 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

Page 16 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN Gil SF LOCATION GUT ITEM II/F COUNT liT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

157 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE 14 49 40 .92 .04 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA II 4 .01

158 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE 14 71 60 3.03 .11 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 34 .01 S PLANT 1

159 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE 14 73 61 3.20 .08 3 I MYSIDACEA F I POLYCHAETA F I SAND I UNIDENTI FlED S AMPHIPOOA F 6 S CRUSTACEA II 4 S PLANT 1

160 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE #4 64 52 2.15 .11 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 13 S CRUSTACEA F 3

161 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE 14 70 58 2.43 .12 5 I EMPTY S AMPHIPOOA F 48 .02 S AMPHIPOOA II 6 .01 S PLANT 1

162 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE #4 67 53 2.02 .12 5 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA II 10 .05 S PLANT 1

163 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE 14 49 40 1.01 .06 3 I UN IDENTI FlED S AMPHIPOOA II 10 .2

164 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE 14 62 50 2.03 .11 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 7 S AMPHIPOOA II 4 S MYSIDACEA II 4

165 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE #4 63 51 2.04 .13 3 I AMPHIPOOA F 55 .02 I PLANT 1 I UN I DENT IF I ED S MYSIDACEA II 5

166 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE #4 68 55 3.02 .22 3 I AMPHIPOOA F I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 67 .06 S MYSIDACEA II 2

167 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE #4 46 37 .71 .04 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 8 S AMPHIPOOA II 2

168 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE #4 62 50 1.85 .13 4 I AMPHIPOOA F I UNIDENTIFIED

Page 17 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL \AI GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

S AMPHIPOOA F 47 .01 S MYSIDACEA W 9 .01 S PLANT 1

169 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE til. 71 59 2.92 .16 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA F 7 S MYSIDACEA W 6

170 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE til. 62 49 1.61 .08 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 30 . 01 S AMPHIPOOA W 5 S OSTRACOOA 1

171 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE #4 71 57 3.05 .17 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPE LI SCA SPP. W 1 S AMPHIPOOA W 2 S CRUSTACEA W 2 S PLANT 1

1n - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE til. 62 51 2.02 .14 3 I AMPHI POOA F 24 .02 S MYSIDACEA W 1 S PLANT 1

173 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE #4 74 61 3.30 .20 3 I UN !DENTI F I ED S AMPHIPOOA F 53 .04 S MYSIDACEA W 1 S PLANT 1

174 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE #4 55 48 1.36 .07 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 7 S AMPHIPOOA W 1 S MYSIDACEA W 3

175 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE til. 56 45 1.48 .08 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 31 .01 S PLANT 1

176 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE #4 60 50 1.80 .06 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 30 .02

1n - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE til. 54 44 .93 .04 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 3 S MYSIDACEA W 8 .02

178 - 28-Dec-92 ONE GRID ABOVE #4 49 39 .55 .20 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 35

202 - 28-Dec-92 ZONE 6 GRID 85 63 49 1.90 .10 S CRUSTACEA F 2 S PLANT 1

203 - 28-Dec-92 ZONE 6 GRID 85 61 48 2.36 .18 3 I MYSIDACEA F 9 .03 S MYSIDACEA F 9 .03 S PLANT 1

Page 18 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

333 - 28-Dec-92 ZONE 2 GRID 20 67 57 2.55 .13 3 I AMPHIPOOA W 3 S AMPHIPOOA F 28 .01 S COROPH IUM SPP. W 14 .03 S MYSIDACEA W 3 S PLANT 1 S TANAIDACEA W 1

334 - 28-Dec-92 ZONE 2 GRID 20 69 60 2.20 .20 4 I COROPH IUM SPP. W 2 I TANAIDACEA W 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 10 S COROPH IUM SPP. W 29 .25 S TANAIDACEA W 8

335 - 28-Dec-92 ZONE 2 GRID 20 64 55 2.21 .11 5 I AMPHIPOOA F 27 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPELI SCA SPP. W 1 S AMPHIPOOA F 60 .20 S COROPH IUM SPP. W 11 .18 S PLANT 1 S UNIDENTIFIED

336 - 28-Dec-92 ZONE 2 GRID 20 53 43 1.42 .13 5 I COROPH IUM SPP. W 1 I PLANT 1 .01 S AMPE LI SCA SPP. W 3 S AMPHIPOOA F 24 S COROPH IUM SPP. W 13 .09 S MYSIDACEA W 15 .03 S TANAIDACEA W 3

374 - 28-Dec-92 ZONE 2 GRID 20 50 41 1.14 .07 4 I EMPTY S AMPHIPOOA F 15 S COROPH IUM SPP. W 5 .01 S MYSIDACEA W 4

179 - 11-Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 41 33 .61 .03 2 S AMPHIPOOA F 10 S TANAIDACEA W 1

180 - 11-Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 39 31 .46 .06 4 I UN IDENTI F I ED S CRUSTACEA F 19 S UNIDENTIFIED

181 - 11-Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 63 52 1.99 .11 2 S SAND S UNIDENTIFIED

182 - 11-Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 34 27 .34 .01 2 I EMPTY S CRUSTACEA F 7 S MYSIDACEA W 2

183 - 11-Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 54 44 1.22 .04 0 I UNIDENTIFIED

Page 19 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL W Gil SF LOCATION GUT ITEM II/F COUNT liT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

184 - 11 -Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 48 42 1.20 .04 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S CRUSTACEA F 10 .01 S PLANT 1

185 - 11 -Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 54 44 1.21 .06 1 S PLANT 9 186 - 11-Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 38 30 .38 . 02 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 187 - 11-Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 35 28 .33 .02 0 S AMPHIPOOA F 13 .01

S AMPHIPOOA II 1 188 - 11-Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 31 25 .23 .01 S AMPHIPOOA F 3

S PLANT 1 189 - 11-Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 69 55 2.42 .14 2 I UNIDENTIFIED

S AMPHIPOOA F 31 .02 190 - 11-Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 90 n 5.88 .05 4 S AMPE LI SCA SPP. II 2

S AMPHIPOOA F 5 S MYSIDACEA II 2 S POLYCHAETA II 4 S SAND

191 - 11-Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 107 91 8.57 .42 4 S AMPE LI SCA SPP. II 1 S COROPHIUM SPP. II 3 S MYSIDACEA II 4 S SAND S UNIDENTIFIED

192 - 11-Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 60 50 1.31 .02 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

193 - 11-Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 64 52 1.61 .07 S AMPHIPOOA F 10 S PLANT 1

194 - 11-Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 115 90 8.07 .44 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S FISH F .16 30

195 - 11-Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 97 80 6_11 .18 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

196 - 11-Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 57 45 1.12 .90 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

197 - 11-Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 107 89 7.21 .31 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA II 6 .01 S CRUSTACEA II 1

198 - 11 -Jan-93 CULVERT #1 DAY ZERO - 135 110 16.56 .61 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S CRAB II .04 S LEPTOCHELA SPP. F

199 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11 64 48 1.84 .11 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

200 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11 63 48 1.51 .08 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

Page 20 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

201 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11 65 50 1.60 .11 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

204 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11 104 86 8.85 .63 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

205 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11 79 63 4.48 .44 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

206 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11 75 58 3.49 .24 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

207 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11 91 70 6.24 .52 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

208 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11 91 n 5.56 .50 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

209 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11 91 70 5.n .61 2 I TROUT CHOW .18 S TROUT CHOW .31

210 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11 80 64 4.04 .33 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

211 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11 71 53 2.57 .23 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

212 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11 66 50 1.98 .15 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

213 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11 61 48 1.68 .17 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

265 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11HARVEST DAY 0 - 110 87 10.33 .n 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

266 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11HARVEST DAY 0 - n 58 3.75 .21 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

267 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11HARVEST DAY 0 - 96 74 6.49 .40 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

268 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11HARVEST DAY 0 - 80 62 4.31 .27 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

269 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11HARVEST DAY 0 - 100 76 8.58 .64 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

270 - 12-Jan-93 POND 11HARVEST DAY 0 - 84 61 4.64 .30 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

587 - 16-Jan-93 BRIDGE SITE / J117 n 58 3.11 .16 3 I CRUSTACEA F 17 0 S COROPHIUH SPP. W 1 0 S MYSIDACEA W 19 .03

607 + 16-Jan-93 BRIDGE SITE J113 86 73 5.86 .18 I EMPTY S UNIDENTIFIED

608 + 16-Jan-93 BRIDGE SITE J113 85 66 4.83 .14 I UNIDENTI FlED S PORTUNIDAE W

Page 21 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN Gil SF LOCATION GUT ITEM WfF COUNT liT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

S SHRIMP 609 - 16-Jan-93 BRIDGE SITE J113 98 78 7_69 .71 3 I UNIDENTIFIED .05

S UNIDENTIFIED .14 610 + 16-Jan-93 BRIDGE SITE J113 80 64 4.08 .32 0 I EMPTY

S EMPTY 611 + 16-Jan-93 BRIDGE SITE J113 103 83 8.96 .26 I AMPELI SCA SPP. F

S UNIDENTIFIED 612 + 16-Jan-93 BRIDGE SITE J113 109 88 11.68 .76 I UNIDENTIFIED

S ANCHOA SPP. II 2 .27 32 27 S PLANT 4

628 - 16-Jan-93 BRIDGE SITE 117J 7 53 43 1.10 .03 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S ISOPOOA 0 S UNIDENTI F I ED

631 + 16-Jan-93 BRIDGE SITE J113 78 62 3.85 .13 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

632 + 16-Jan-93 BRIDGE SITE J113 59 47 1.44 .03 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S UNIDENTIFIED

633 + 16-Jan-93 BRIDGE SITE J113 64 51 2.16 .04 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

634 + 16-Jan-93 BRIDGE SITE J113 54 41 1.21 .04 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA II

214 - 19-Jan-93 478 88 69 5.58 .30 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S SHRIMP F 2 .01 S SHRIMP II 5 .13

215 - 19-Jan-93 478 98 75 6.66 .22 2 I POLYCHAETA F 1 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPELI SCA SPP. II 2 S AMPHIPOOA F 1

216 - 19-Jan-93 478 104 85 9.28 .36 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

217 - 19-Jan-93 478 94 75 5.99 .33 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S ANCHOA SPP. W 1 .17 34 S SHRIMP F 1 S SHRIMP II 4 .02 S UNIDENTIFIED

218 - 19-Jan-93 478 96 76 6.83 .22 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S UNIDENTIFIED

219 - 19-Jan-93 478 90 71 5.31 .29 2 I POLYCHAETA I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F 2 S POLYCHAETA F

Page 22 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN Gil SF LOCATION GUT ITEM II/F COUNT liT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

220 - 19-Jan-93 478 79 65 3.87 .14 I MOLLUSCA I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA II

221 - 19-Jan-93 478 89 73 4.93 .24 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA F S AMPHIPODA II

222 - 19-Jan-93 478 87 69 4.68 .21 0 I EMPTY S EMPTY

223 - 19-Jan-93 478 n 59 2.97 .15 I UNIDENTI F I ED S CRUSTACEA II S UNIDENTIFIED

224 - 19-Jan-93 478 62 48 1.67 .05 2 S AMPHIPODA F S AMPHIPODA II S PLANT

225 - 19-Jan-93 478 84 67 3.48 .27 I EMPTY S UNIDENTIFIED

226 - 19-Jan-93 478 86 68 4.26 .26 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA II S MYSIDACEA II

227 - 19-Jan-93 478 n 58 3.09 .22 4 I PLANT 1 .01 I UNIDENTIFIED S CRAB II

228 - 19-Jan-93 478 63 48 2.02 .10 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA II 1 S MYSIDACEA II 2 S UNIDENTIFIED

229 - 19-Jan-93 478 66 53 2. 21 .09 I NEMATODA 2 S UN IDENTI FlED

230 - 19-Jan-93 478 60 47 1.55 .17 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S CRAB S MYSIDACEA

231 - 19-Jan-93 478 81 63 4.10 .33 0 I UNIDENTI F I ED S EMPTY

232 - 19-Jan-93 478 81 64 3.98 .24 3 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA II 1 S FISH F 3 S UNIDENTIFIED

233 - 19-Jan-93 478 80 63 3.97 .28 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA II 1 S MYSIDACEA F 2 S MYSIDACEA II 19 .02

Page 23 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

234 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE SS 109 90 9.00 .56 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S UNIDENTIFIED

235 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 92 82 5.65 .29 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S UNIDENTIFIED

236 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 90 74 5.27 .28 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W

237 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 75 61 4.40 .15 I UN IDENTI FlED S PLANT

238 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 84 70 4.30 .23 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

239 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 67 56 2.46 .17 0 I POLYCHAETA S EMPTY

240 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 90 82 8.05 .56 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S UNIDENTI FlED

241 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 92 75 5.58 .23 0 S UNIDENTIFIED 242 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 91 74 5.24 .35 0 I AMPHIPODA F 10

S EMPTY 243 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 99 81 7.10 .70 4 I UNIDENTIFIED

S ANCHOA SPP . W 1 .19 40 S PLANT

244 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 92 78 5.84 .35 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S UNIDENTIFIED

245 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 96 79 6.54 .28 3 S AMPHIPODA F S MOLLUSCA W S POLYCHAETA W

246 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 78 64 3.38 .18 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 247 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 82 66 3.81 .20 0 I POLYCHAETA 248 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 86 70 4.42 .36 0 I UNIDENTIFIED

S UNIDENTIFIED 249 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 70 57 2.51 .15 0 I UNIDENTIFIED

S UNIDENTIFIED 250 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 86 71 4.32 .22 0 I UNIDENTIFIED

S UNIDENTIFIED 251 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 83 68 4.39 .29 0 I UNIDENTIFIED

S UN IDENTI FlED 252 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 66 54 1.96 .12 0 I UN IDENTI FlED

S UN IDENTI FlED 253 + 19-Jan-93 478 1 WEEK POST RELE - 71 59 2.50 .16 4 I UN IDENTI FlED

S AMPHIPODA F 8 .01 S AMPHIPOOA W 1

Page 24 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

128 - 20-Jan-93 GRID '72;Z5;#453 OFF 21.06 I CALLINECTES SPP. W 1 I CRAB F 4 .26 I POLYCHAETA F 12 2.19 I UNIDENTI FlED S CRAB 1 S PLANT 2 .05 S POLYCHAETA W 1 S UNIDENTIFIED

258 + 20-Jan-93 457 GRID 87 73 58 2.64 .09 3 I MYSIDACEA I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W 6

259 + 20-Jan-93 460 83 64 3.99 .14 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W

260 + 20-Jan-93 460 84 66 3.91 .15 0 I MYSIDACEA F I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

261 + 20-Jan-93 456 GRID 86 89 68 4.82 .30 0 I UNIDENTIFIED .01 S EMPTY

262 + 20-Jan-93 456 GRID 86 101 82 8.09 .67 I EMPTY S PLANT .01

263 + 20-Jan-93 456 GRID 86 95 74 6.12 .44 0 I UNIDENTIFIED .01 S EMPTY

264 + 20-Jan-93 456 GRID 86 76 58 3.76 .18 I EMPTY S UNIDENTIFIED .01

271 - 29-Jan-93 CULVERT EAST SECT. - 109 93 11.39 .57 4 I AMPHIPODA .08 I POLY CHAETA S UNIDENTIFIED

272 - 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 1 EAST SECT. - 109 92 9.97 .44 I AMPE 1I SCA SPP. W 1 I AMPHIPODA W 2 I POLYCHAETA .01 S UNIDENTIFIED

273 - 29-Jan-93 CULVERT EAST SECT. - 79 64 3.68 .15 0 I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

274 - 29-Jan-93 CULVERT EAST SECT. - 106 80 6.20 .35 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W S POLYCHAETA F

275 - 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 1 EAST SECT. - 105 85 9.26 .51 I PLANT 1 .08 I UNIDENTIFIED S UNIDENTIFIED

276 + 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 2 WEST SS 72 60 3.28 .19 I UNIDENTI F I ED S AMPHIPODA F 4

Page 25 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

S AMPHIPODA W 5 .02 S PLANT 1

2n + 29·Jan-93 CULVERT 1 79 63 3.67 .23 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA W 2 S CRAB F 2 S MYSIDACEA F 1 S MYSIDACEA W 1

278 + 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 82 64 3.85 .12 I UNIDENTIFIED S UNIDENTIFIED

279 - 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 70 53 2.42 .05 3 I AMPHIPODA W I CRAB F I MYSIDACEA F I MYSIDACEA W I UNIDENTIFIED S CRAB F 2 S MYSIDACEA F 1 S MYSIDACEA W 1

280 + 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 63 49 1.98 .04 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA F 1 S MYSIDACEA W 12 .01

281 + 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 105 86 8.42 .49 I AMPELI SCA SPP. W 1 I AMPHIPODA W 1 S AMPHIPODA W 1

283 + 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 100 81 6.61 .32 I FISH F 2 S AMPHIPODA W 1

284 + 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 108 89 9.62 .47 0 I FISH F 1 I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

285 + 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 83 66 4.27 .18 3 I FISH F S FISH F S UNIDENTIFIED

286 + 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 94 74 5.83 .24 0 I AMPHIPODA I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

287 + 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 1 98 78 6.83 .40 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPOOA F S MYSIDACEA W S UNIDENTIFIED

288 + 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 1 124 103 14.26 .44 0 I CRAB W I ISOPOOA I UNIDENTIFIED

Page 26 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

S EMPTY 289 + 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 1 98 75 5.93 .38 3 I CRAB

I UNIDENTI FlED S CRAB F 2 S PLANT 1 S UNIDENTIFIED

290 + 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 1 102 79 7.41 .42 2 I AMPHIPODA F 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA W 7 .01 S CRUSTACEA F 8 S POLYCHAETA F

291 + 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 1 99 79 6.66 .40 3 I SAND I UNIDENTIFIED S CRAB F 2 S MYSIDACEA W 1 S OSTRACODA 1 S SAND S UNIDENTIFIED

292 + 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 1 86 65 4.40 .31 4 I UNIDENTIFIED S AMPHIPODA F 1 S AMPHIPODA W 2 S CRAB F 5 .01 S MYSIDACEA F 1 S MYSIDACEA W 4 .01 S UNIDENTIFIED

293 + 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 92 73 5.29 .30 2 I CRAB F 5 .01 I UNIDENTIFIED S UNIDENTI FlED

294 + 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 106 85 8.29 .30 0 I CRAB F I UNIDENTI FlED S EMPTY

295 + 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 1 78 61 3.73 .26 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA F 1 S MYSIDACEA W 2 S OSTRACODA 1

296 + 29-Jan-93 CULVERT 1 105 84 8.45 .33 0 I AMPHIPODA W 1 I UNIDENTIFIED S EMPTY

664 - 02-Feb-93 GRID II 172 NA 96 83 9.60 .40 0 I SHRIMP F 13 0.02 S EMPTY

Page 27 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

659 - 03-Feb-93 GR I D tin COL tIS 75 NA 1n 136 45.17 1.74 3 I AMPELI SCA SPP. W 6 0.01 I CRAB F 4 0.03 I POLYCHAETA F .42 S AMPELISCA SPP. W NA S UNIDENTIFIED .16

648 - 04-Feb-93 NEARSHORE tI 511 NA 70 55 2.87 .14 4 I UNIDENTI FlED NA S FISH F 1 NA S MYSIDACEA F 1 NA S MYSIDACEA W 14 0.06 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

588 - 10-Feb-93 J 182 LAKE SITE 125 102 16.97 .57 0 I CRUSTACEA F 5 .01 I SHRIMP F 1 0 S EMPTY

629 12-Feb-93 CULVERT #2 .15 3 I CRUSTACEA F 9 0 S AMPHIPOOA F 53 .02 s COROPH IUM SPP. W 2 0 S PLANT 5 S UNIDENTIFIED

637 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT #2 65 50 2.03 .07 2 I UNIDENTIFIED .03 S POLYCHAETA F 10 S UNIDENTIFIED

638 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT #2 58 45 1.39 I UNIDENTIFIED .01 S AMPHIPOOA F 1 S COROP H IUM SPP. W 1 S POLYCHAETA F 50 S TANAIDACEA F 2 S TANAIDACEA W 3 S UNIDENTIFIED

639 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT tl2 62 49 1.70 .11 3 I UNIDENTI FlED .02 S AMPHIPOOA W 6 S PLANT 1 S UNIDENTIFIED

640 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT tl2 60 48 1.59 .09 I UNIDENTIFIED .01 S AMPHIPOOA W 3 S UNIDENTIFIED .01

649 + 12-Feb-93 CULVERT #1 NA 83 65 4.06 .17 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S TANAIDACEA W 2 NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.03

650 + 12-Feb-93 CULVERT tl1 NA 81 n 4.21 .29 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.04 S TANAIDACEA W 2 NA

Page 28 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IoN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM WfF COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

651 + 12-Feb-93 CULVERT .1 NA 84 68 4.31 .21 2 UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.03

652 + 12- Feb-93 CULVERT .1 NA 101 80 7.12 .34 4 I POLYCHAETA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S AMPHIPOOA W 17 0.06 S INSECTA F 1 S POLYCHAETA F NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

653 + 12-Feb-93 CULVERT .1 NA 103 84 9.19 . 41 3 I AMPELI SCA SPP. W NA I COROPH IUM SPP. W NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.08 S COROPHIUM SPP. W 8 0. 05

654 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT .1 NA 102 82 7.11 .30 3 I COROPH IUM SPP. F 2 NA I POLYCHAETA F I UNIDENTIFIED S COROPHIUM SPP. W NA S TANAIDACEA II NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

655 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT .1 NA 86 71 4.57 .13 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S COROPHIUM SPP. W 5 0.01 S PLANT 1 S UNIDENTIFIED

656 + 12-Feb-93 CULVERT .1 NA 88 71 4.50 .16 2 I UNIDENTIFIED NA S COROPHIUM SPP. W 12 0.02 S ISOPOOA W 5 NA S MYSIDACEA W 1 NA S PLANT 1 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

657 + 12-Feb-93 CULVERT .1 NA 88 69 5.11 .14 3 I EMPTY S AMPELI SCA SPP. W 24 0.03 S AMPHIPOOA F 4 NA S COROPHIUM SPP. W 1 NA S POLYCHAETA F 1

658 + 12-Feb-93 CULVERT .1 NA 68 58 2.n .08 3 I ISOPOOA W 3 NA I PLANT 2 I TANAIDACEA W 4 NA S MYSIDACEA W 3 NA S PLANT 1 NA S POLYCHAETA F S UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

Page 29 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL Ilol G'" SF LOCATION GUT ITEM "'IF CClJNT "'T. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

661 + 12-Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 73 59 2.85 .09 2 I UNIDENTIFIED NA S AMPHI POOA '" NA S UNIDENTI FlED 0.01

662 + 12-Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 96 n 6.10 I S

663 + 12- Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 73 S9 2.65 .12 2 I ' UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S AMPHIPOOA F NA S ISOPOOA

'" NA S PLANT S UNIDENTIFIED NA

678 + 12-Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 81 65 3.69 .09 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S AMPHIPOOA '" 5 0.02

679 + 12- Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 91 73 5.73 .22 3 I POLYCHAETA F I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S AMPE LI SCA SPP.

'" 16 0.06

S COROPHIUM SPP . '" 1 NA S MYSIDACEA '" 3 0.01 S POLYCHAETA F

680 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 85 68 5.15 .18 2 I POLYCHAETA F NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S COROP H IUM SPP.

'" 2 NA

S GRANDIDIERELLA BON. '" 2 NA S POLYCHAETA F NA S TANAIDACEA

'" NA

S UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 681 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 64 50 2.10 .08 3 I AMPHIPOOA F 3 NA

I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S POLYCHAETA F NA S TANAIDACEA

'" NA 682 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 82 66 3.86 .10 2 I PLANT NA

I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S COROPHIUM SPP. '" 2 NA S GRANDIDIERELLA BON.

'" 2 NA

683 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 88 70 5.19 .21 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S PLANT NA

684 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 95 75 6.59 .24 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S COROPH IUM SPP. '" 3 NA S TANAIDACEA '" 1 NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0. 01

685 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 88 70 5.16 .20 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S EMPTY

Page 30 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN Gil SF LOCATION GUT ITEM IIfF COUNT liT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

686 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 81 64 3.98 .08 0 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.05 S EMPTY

687 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 84 65 3.95 .17 4 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S COROPH I UN SPP. II 8 0.03 S GRANDIDIERELLA BON. II 2 NA S PLANT 1 NA S UNIDENTIFIED NA

688 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 86 68 5.02 .22 3 I POLYCHAETA F NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S AMPE LI SCA SPP. II 1 NA S NEREIDAE II 5 NA S POLYCHAETA F NA

689 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA T7 62 3.66 .07 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S AMPHIPOOA II 3 NA S MYSIDACEA II 3 NA S NEREIDAE II 1 NA

690 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 94 76 7.17 .49 4 S COROPHIUM SPP. II 21 0.08 S GRANDIDIERELLA BON. II 1 NA S NE~EIDAE II 2 NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

691 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 93 74 5.97 .23 4 I POLYCHAETA F NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03

692 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 93 73 5.86 .17 3 I ISOPOOA II 2 NA I PLANT 1 NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S AMPHI POOA II 8 NA S CYATHURA POLITA II 1 NA S ISOPOOA II 1 NA S PLANT 1 NA

693 - 12-Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 110 87 9.51 .24 3 I UNIDENTI FlED 0.01 S AMPEL I SCA SPP. II 11 0.03 S POLYCHAETA F NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.05

694 + 12-Feb-93 CULVERT '1 NA 84 66 4.57 .27 3 I AMPE LI SCA SPP. II NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S AMPELI SCA SPP. II 16 0.04 S MYSIDACEA II 1 NA S NEREIDAE II 1 NA

695 + 12-Feb-93 CULVERT #1 NA 83 67 3.99 .12 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.04 S AMPELI SCA SPP. II NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.04

Page 31 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION sITe GEAR TL SL W GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

696 + 12-Feb-93 CULVERT .1 NA 95 76 5.65 .11 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S AMPE LI SCA SPP. W 3 NA S CYATHURA POll TA W 2 0.02 S ISOPODA W 1 NA S POLYCHAETA F 2 NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.04

697 + 12-Feb-93 CULVERT .1 NA 81 65 3.95 .24 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S AMPHIPODA F 1 NA S ISOPODA W 2 NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.03

698 + 12-Feb-93 CULVERT .1 NA 102 94 9.76 .44 I PLANT TWIG I UNIDENTIFIED .18 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

699 + 12-Feb-93 CULVERT .1 NA 96 78 6.84 .35 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.04 S CYATHURA POLITA 2 0.05 S NEMATODA W 1 NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.07

700 + 12-Feb-93 CULVERT .1 NA 124 102 12.90 .64 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S AMPE LI SCA SPP. W NA S COROPH IUM SPP. W NA S UNIDENTI F I ED 0.03

701 + 12-Feb-93 CULVERT .1 NA 124 102 12.90 .64 I AMPE LI SCA SPP. W NA I ISOPODA W NA I PLANT NA I UNIDENTIFIED .14 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

589 16-Feb-93 SHORE SET 1561 122 99 16.66 .90 5 I AMPHI PODA W 70 .98 S AMPHIPODA W 58 .1 S CRUSTACEA W 2 0 S SHRIMP W 1 .09

635 - 17-Feb-93 Z 6 GRID 90 COL 568 - 102 80 7.74 .24 2 I MYSIDACEA F 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W 8 .02

636 - 17-Feb-93 Z 6 GRID 90 COL 568 - 64 52 1.92 .06 2 I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA W 3 S UNIDENTI FI ED

641 + 17-Feb-93 Z 6 GRID 90 COL 568 NA 115 91 11.60 .42 4 I AMPELI SCA SPP. W 3 1 I UNIDENTI F I ED .13 S AMPELI SCA SPP . W 2 NA S MYSIDACEA W 12 0.5

Page 32 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

642 + 17-Feb-93 Z 6 GRID 90 COl 568 NA 95 n 6.73 .32 4 I INSECTA F 4 NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S AMPELI SCA SPP. W 1 NA S INSECTA F 7 NA S MYSIOACEA F 1 NA S MYSIDACEA W 14 0.03 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.03

643 + 17-Feb-93 Z 6 GRID 90 COL 568 NA 92 n 6.17 .29 4 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S AMPELI SCA SPP. W 1 NA S MYSIDACEA W 28 0.08 S UNIDENTIFIED

644 + 17- Feb-93 Z 6 GRID 90 COL 568 NA 109 87 10.40 .48 4 I AMPHIPOOA F 1 NA I MYSIDACEA W 3 NA I UNIDENTIFIED S MYSIDACEA F 4 NA S MYSIDACEA W 42 .17

646 - 02-Mar-93 602 NA 112 92 10.89 .34 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S AMPELISCA SPP. W 4 0.01 S COROPHIUM SPP. W 4 0.01 S UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

647 + 02-Mar-93 609 NA 104 83 8.60 .35 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.06 S AMPHIPOOA W 5 0.02

660 - 03-Mar-93 617 GRID #I 70 NA 111 93 12.17 .65 2 I AMPHIPOOA F 50 0.05 I PLANT 1 NA S AMPE LI SCA SPP. W 31 0.09 S AMPHIPOOA F 22 0.01 S MYSIDACEA W 1 0.0

666 + 08-Mar-93 R70/J143 CULVERT #11 S3 123 100 15.20 .42 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S INSECTA F 1 S MYSIDACEA W 16 0.03 S PLANT 2

667 + 08-Mar-93 R70/J143 CULVERT #11 S3 89 n 5.89 .29 5 I AMPELI SCA SPP. F 2 NA I PLANT 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S AMPELI SCA SPP. W 13 NA S COROPHIUM SPP. W 4 NA S GRANDIDIERELLA BON. W 4 NA S POLYCHAETA F NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.02

668 + 08-Mar-93 R70/J143 CULVERT #11 S3 109 88 9.64 .37 4 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.05 S COROPHIUM SPP. F 2 NA

Page 33 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM W/F COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

S COROPHIUM SPP. W 14 0.04 S PLANT 3 S PLANT 4

669 + 08-Mar-93 R70/J143 CULVERT .1 S3 119 96 14.02 .50 2 I AMPELISCA SPP. F B NA I OSTRACODA W 1 NA I TANAIDACEA W 1 NA S AMPE LI SCA SPP. W 10 0.03

670 + 08-Mar-93 J147/LAKE SITE 11 79 65 3.45 .13 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S AMPHIPODA W 1 NA S MYSIDACEA W 4 NA S PLANT 1 NA

671 + OB-Mar-93 R71/J144 CULVERT .1 53 76 60 5.67 .06 I UN IDENTI F I ED 0.01 S MYSIDACEA W 1 NA

6n - OB-Mar-93 J147/LAKE SITE S1 90 73 5.51 .13 I AMPELI SCA 5PP. W 2 NA I COROPH IUM SPP. W 1 NA I UN IDENTI F I ED 0.03 S COROPH IUM 5PP. W NA

673 - OB-Mar-93 R68 S3 14B 122 26.39 .BO 3 I COROPH IUM SPP. W NA I OSTRACODA W NA I POLYCHAETA W NA S AMPE LI SCA SPP. W NA S UNIDENTIFIED O.OB

674 + OB-Mar-93 R68 53 133 110 19.50 .4B 0 I UNIDENTIFIED .15 5 EMPTY

675 - OB-Mar-93 R68 S3 119 96 12.90 .35 I OSTRACODA W NA I POLYCHAETA F I POLYCHAETA W I UNIDENTIFIED S COROPH IUM SPP. W 3 NA S CYATHURA POLITA W 1 0.03

676 - 08-Mar-93 R67 S3 141 115 23.92 .5B I UNIDENTIFIED .16 S PLANT 2 NA

677 - OB-Mar-93 R68 S3 1B2 150 50.24 6.44 5 I UNIDENTIFIED S CRAB W 5.31

703 - 08-Mar-93 CULVER .1 R71/J144 NA 89 73 5.10 .16 I UNIDENTI F I ED 0.03 S AMPELISCA SPP. W 3 NA S ISOPODA W 1 NA

705 - OB-Mar-93 CULVERT .1 R70/J140 NA 68 54 1.99 .OB 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S AMPE LI SCA SPP. W 3 NA S MYSIDACEA W 11 0.01

Page 34 Appendix II Table 1. Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa

Bay) .

FISH NO. TAG pATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL IN GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM WfF COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

706 - 08-Mar-93 CULVERT .1 R71/J141 NA 93 74 5.19 .18 I CYATHURA POLITA W NA I NEMATODA W NA I POLYCHAETA F NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S AMPE LI SCA SPP. W 2 NA S · MYSIDACEA F 2 NA S MYSIDACEA W 2 NA

707 + 08-Mar-93 R70 CULVERT .1 J140 IIA 124 99 15.07 .39 4 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.07 S CYATHURA POll TA W 2 .14 S PLANT 1 NA S POLYCHAETA F NA

708 - 08-Mar-93 CULVERT .1 R71fJ141 NA 94 76 6.14 .24 2 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.04 S POLYCHAETA F NA S UN !DENT IF I ED 0.04

709 - 08-Mar-93 CULVERT .1 R71/J141 NA 89 73 5.09 .15 3 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S AMPELI SCA SPP. W 5 NA S MYSIDACEA W 1 NA S POLY CHAETA F NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.01

710 - 08-Mar-93 CULVERT .1 R70/J140 NA 98 80 7.25 .34 2 I NEMATODA W 5 NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.07 S AMPELI SCA SPP. W 4 0.01

711 - 08-Mar-93 R68 S3 155 132 31.98 .91 3 I UNIDENTIFIED .36 S COROPH IUM SPP. W 3 NA S CRUSTACEA 0.02 S CYATHURA POLITA W 2 NA S MYSIDACEA W 1 NA S PLANT 1 NA S UNIDENTIFIED 0.03

712 - 08-Mar-93 LAKE SITE J144 NA 108 86 10.33 .30 4 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S AMPELI SCA SPP. W 23 0.07 S NEMATODA W 1 NA

713 - 08-Mar-93 LAKE SITE J144 NA 121 99 13.69 .56 5 I AMPE LI SCA SPP. F 2 NA I UNIDENTIFIED .10 S AMPE LI SCA SPP. W 22 0.06 S MYSIDACEA W 16 0.05

714 - 08-Mar-93 CULVERT '1 R70/J140 NA 82 65 3.91 .13 2 I AMPELI SCA SPP. W 2 NA I COROPH IUM SPP. W 2 NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.01 S AMPELI SCA SPP. F 2 NA S AMpELI SCA SPP. W 2 NA

Appendix II Table I . Page 35

Continued. Red drum gut analysis data (September 1992-May 1993, Bishop Harbor, Tampa Bay).

FISH NO. TAG DATE COLLECTION SITE GEAR TL SL W GW SF LOCATION GUT ITEM WIF COUNT WT. INGESTED FISH LENGTHS

S COROPH IUM SPP. 101 NA 715 - 08-Mar-93 CULVERT .1 R70/J140 IIA 118 96 12.82 .68 5 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.05

S AMPE LI SCA SPP. 101 100 .27 S CYATHURA POLITA 101 1 0.02 S MYSIDACEA 101 4 0.01

716 - 08-Mar-93 CULVERT .1 R71/J141 IIA 99 79 7.24 .45 5 I AMPELI SCA SPP. F 3 NA I MYSIDACEA F 1 NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.03 S AMPE LI SCA SPP. 101 42 .12 S POLYCHAETA F

702 + 08-Apr-93 G t86 J188 IIA 138 112 21.84 .69 3 I PLANT NA I UNIDENTIFIED 0.08 S COROPH IUM SPP. 101 2 NA S UN IDENTI FlED .14

704 + 08-Apr-93 G .86 J188 IIA 100 81 7.47 . 27 4 I UNIDENTIFIED 0.02 S AMPHIPOOA 101 25 0.08 S COROPH IUM SPP. 101 3 NA S CRAB F 1 0.02