Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those...

54
crosoft Office PowerPoint 2003.l

Transcript of Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those...

Page 1: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2003.lnk

Page 2: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US.

• Parties in the United States are relatively weak…– Laws and rules have taken away

much of the political parties power

– Also, many voters have lost their sense of commitment to party identification

Page 4: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• Three political arenas within which parties may be found

1. Label

2. Organization – that recruits and campaigns for candidates

3. Set of leaders – try to organize and control the legislative and executive branches

• AMERICAN PARTIES HAVE BECOME WEAKER IN ALL THREE ARENAS

Page 5: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• What is a powerful Party?– One whose label has a

strong appeal for voters– Whose organization can

decide who will be candidates and how their campaigns will be managed

– Whose leaders can dominate one or all branches of government

Page 8: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• IN EUROPE…– NO PRIMARY ELECTIONS– Only way to become

candidate for office is to persuade party leaders to put your name on the ballot

– Majority party in Parliament in Europe chooses chief executive of government (Prime Minister) Great Britain

Page 11: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• POLITICAL CULTURE….– In Europe large number of citizens will

join a party, pay dues, and attend regular meetings

– In the United States, political parties do not play an important part in the life of the average citizen• Do not join party except by voting

for that party’s candidate• More people becoming Independent

Page 13: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• THE FOUNDING…– The Founders disliked

parties, thinking of them as “factions” motivated by ambition and self-interest

– George Washington – in his Farewell Address condemned parties

Page 15: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• PARTY REALIGNMENTS…– Critical or realigning

periods – major shifts occur in the popular coalition supporting one or both parties

– Some years heavily Democrat and other years heavily Republican

Page 16: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• TWO KINDS OF REALIGNMENTS1. A MAJOR PARTY IS SO BADLY

DEFEATED THAT IT DISAPPEARS AND A NEW PARTY EMERGES TO TAKE ITS PLACE

2. TWO EXISTING PARTIES CONTINUE BUT VOTERS SHIFT THEIR SUPPORT FROM ONE TO THE OTHER

• In short, an electoral realignment occurs when a new issue of utmost importance to the voters cuts across existing party divisions and replaces old issues that were formerly the basis of party identification

Page 20: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• Party-column (or Indiana) ballot:

–Vote for Party not individual candidates

Page 21: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.
Page 23: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• Both Parties are quite similar….

– Both have national conventions – meet every 4 years to nominate president

– Both have national committees which manage convention party affairs

– Both have congressional campaign committee that helps members of Congress with elections

– Both have a national chairman who manages the day-to-day work of the party

Page 27: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• THE MACHINE (213-215)– Party machine is an organization

that recruits its members by the use of tangible incentives…• Money• Political jobs• Favors from government• Example, Tammany Hall in

NYC• Value winning above

everything else

Page 28: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• Combating the Party Machine– Hatch Act – made it illegal

for federal civil service employees to take an active part in political management or political campaigns by serving as party officers, soliciting campaign funds, etc. (214)

Page 30: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• SOLIDARY GROUPS (215-216)– A groups of people who

enjoy politics rather than an interest in issues, as their reason for joining the party organization

– Solidary incentives – the social rewards (sense of pleasure, status, or companionship) that lead people to join political organizations

Page 31: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• SPONSORED PARTIES (216)– Occurs when another

organization exists in the community that can create, or at least, sponsor, a local party structure

– Example: Democratic Party in Detroit, has been developed, led, and to a degree financed by the political-action arm of the United Auto Workers Union

Page 36: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.
Page 37: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• Plurality System – an electoral system in which the winner is the person who gets the most votes, even if he or she does not get 50 + 1 %– This is used in almost

all elections– The plurality system

hurts third parties

Page 39: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.
Page 40: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• PERSISTENCE OF TWO-PARTY IN THE OPINIONS OF THE VOTERS– Most of the time most

citizens have agreed enough to permit issues to come together into two broad coalitions

– People just like it this way

Page 44: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• Greatest impact of Minority Parties is…– Minority Parties give a

threat of factional split which the two major parties make efforts to avoid

– Most successful third party movement was by Ross Perot who led the Reform Party

Page 45: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.
Page 46: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• Is much different today than in the past

• Majority parties face two contrary forces when choosing a candidate

1. Nominate a candidate who can appeal to the majority of voters; who will have middle-of-the-road views

2. Keep people from leaving party (factionalists) – they will compromise with the extremists. Such factions as Gun Rights, Abortion, Environment

Page 47: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• Today, power of party leaders & elected officials within the power has diminished.– WHY….– Because, most delegates

are voted for in the primary elections

• The delegates names appear on the ballot

• Example: John Doe (McCain); Jane Doe (Obama)

Page 48: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• ARE THE DELEGATES REPRESENTATIVE TO THE VOTERS?– NO. The delegates have had

views on a variety of important issues that were vastly different than those of the rank-and-file.

– Democrat delegates = more liberal

– Republican delegates = more conservative

Page 51: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• WHO ARE THE NEW DELEGATES (225)– Both Republican and

Democrat delegates tend to be more issue-oriented activists

– Presidential nominating conventions are now heavily influenced by ideologically motivated activists

Page 52: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.
Page 53: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.

• Democrats have been winning Congress and not President

• Republicans have been winning Presidential office and not Congress

Page 54: Political parties in other democratic nations are more effective at mobilizing voters than those here in the US. Parties in the United States are relatively.