Political Participation
description
Transcript of Political Participation
Political Participation
Why Do People Vote? Who Votes?Do We Care?
Homework Due Thursday, BEGINNING of Class 3-1, 6-6
3-4 for extra credit (worth 20 points)
http://elections.gmu.edu/Voter_Turnout_2004.htm
Pre-1990s Scholarship Two camps
Rational choice theorists “Demographic predictor” researchers
Anthony Downs, “An Economic Theory of Democracy” (1957) People vote if (P*B) – C > 0
Good theory, bad prediction “Predicts” that rational people never vote Possible “fix”
Focus on different benefits . . . Psychic benefits, “duty”
Turnout not always sensitive to changes in costs National Voter Registration Act (Motor Voter
Act) of 1993) increased registration but not turnout
BUT what about effects of “same day registration”?
2004 Total Turnout Rates for Voting Eligible Population Minnesota: 77.21% Wisconsin: 76.19% Maine: 73.37%
Possible explanations:
Law High Turnout
LawCivic Culture
High Turnout
Other Camp Demographic people are able to predict
behavior based on characteristics Education SES Race Age
But, they don’t really explain why people vote (description rather than explanation)
So . . . One camp is developing
explanations that don’t do a good job of describing actual behavior
The other camp is developing descriptions but not bothering to explain the “why” question
Civic Voluntarism Model Henry Brady, Sidney Verba and
Kay Lehman Schlozman “Voice and Equality”
Civic Voluntarism Model Interest/Engagement Mobilization/Recruitment Resources
Interest/Engagement interest in politics political efficacy (“I can make a
difference, I can participate effectively”) sense of civic duty (“It’s my job as an
American to participate”) group consciousness (“As my
community goes, so go I”) party identification commitment to personal issues
What might affect interest/engagement?
Mobilization/Recruitment Being asked to participate What increases chances of
recruitment?
Resources Time Money “Civic skills”
Organizational skills Language skills Social adeptness
What increases resources?
Note . . . Some demographic characteristics
can cut both ways Example: having children
May increase interest/engagement May decrease resources
Implications for Civic Voluntarism Model “Equal opportunity” not all that equal Importance of social capital and group
membership Importance of “political entrepreneurs” –
politicians and groups that mobilize people
Importance of childhood experiences (family life, education) in adult political behavior
Barriers to ParticipationFormal Voter Eligibility Registration laws Campaign finance laws Number / quality of polling places
Barriers to ParticipationInformal Lack of money Lack of time Lack of knowledge Language barriers Lack of “social capital”
Participation: The Big Picture 2004: 55% of “Voting Age Population”
actually voted (highest since 1968) 2002: 37% of “Voting Age Population”
actually voted Numbers somewhat misleading
“VAP” includes all adults, even those who are ineligible to vote.
In fact, 63.8% of the CITIZEN population voted in 2004
Turnout Declining over past 50 years Why? Do we care?
Turnout in 2004 - Race% Adult Citizens
VotingWhite 67.2%
Black 60.0%
Hispanic 47.2%
Asian 44.1%
Turnout in 2004 - Gender Men (citizens): 62.1% Women (citizens): 65.4%
Turnout in 2004 -- Age
18 to 24 years 46.7%25 to 34 years 55.7%35 to 44 years 64.0%45 to 54 years 68.7%55 to 64 years 72.8%65 to 74 years 73.3%75 years and over 68.5%
Demographics of Participation Higher education Higher SES Higher age
Cohort Effect?
Big Picture Again Again, do we care about turnout? What can we do to fix it?