Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
Transcript of Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
A Performance Framework for the Nottinghamshire
Partnership
Chris Common
Senior Policy & Performance Officer
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
Who am I?
• Chris Common
• Senior Policy & Performance Officer
• Policy, Partnerships & Performance Team
• Corporate performance management
• Partnership performance management
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
Why do we need a framework?
• To provide:– Context– Structure– Guidance– Consistency– “A common set of principles and processes
for all to operate in effectively”
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
National perspective• Strong & Prosperous Communities White Paper,
Oct 06• New national framework – Local Area
Agreements• Fewer performance measures• Local determination of priorities• Focus on area rather than organisation = CPA to
CAA• Delivery in partnership rather than separately
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
Key Considerations/Influences
• LAA themes (x6) and priorities (x10)
• Partner organisations capacity to deliver
• Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) and the National Indicator set (CLG & The Audit Commission)
• GOEM
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
Key Questions• How well are we meeting the targets of the ‘new’
LAA (2008-11)?• How well are we delivering the actions in the
LAA delivery plans?• How well are we managing financial resources?• How well are we achieving the stretch targets of
the first LAA (2006-09)?• How well are we performing against all National
Indicators?
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
National Indicators
198
51 3 (local)
LAA
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
51 National Indicators in the LAA
3 (local)
3516
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
Managing delivery of the LAA/Nottinghamshire
Partnership
• Delivery Plans• Performance measurement• Performance monitoring and review• Performance management
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
Gathering performance information
• What information is needed?– Performance against targets– Progress with delivery– Financial spend
• For what areas?– Countywide– Districts/LSPs
• How often?– Quarterly
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
Performance Information System - PRISM
• Holds all information• Viewed from the web• Updated daily• Displays performance against target• Analysis by
– theme– priority– area
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
Performance Information Flow
Partner Agencies
PRISM
Notts Partnership Website
198 NIs
LAA & non-LAA NIs
Supporting commentaries +
3 ‘local’ LAA Measures
Web Reports
Govt DeptsThe Hub
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
Report Basics• Based on comparison of actual vs. target
10% or more below target
10%-0% below target
On or up to 10% above target
10% or more above target
No actual (or target) available
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
Monitoring and Review
• Relate to delivery planning arrangements• Involve
– Delivery partnerships– Theme partnerships– District LSPs– Partnership Management Group– Strategic Partnership Board
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
Performance Management
• Who does what to make a difference?– Change in delivery plan(s)– Change in resource allocation– Change in policy of partner organisation(s)– Change in working relationships between
partners
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
The Framework
PERFORMANCE
DELIVERY
FINANCE
Information originator
organisation
Delivery Partnership(Progress)
County Finance
Delivery Partnership
(Interpretation)
District LSP Theme group
County Partnership
Theme Group
Partnership Management
Group
INFORMATION PRISM MANAGEMENT
Strategic Partnership
Board
The Hub
Policy, Partnerships and Performance Team
Any Questions??
(0115) 9772866 or 07534 227874