Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

22
Polarization Busy Week & Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress Commissioning Progress Michael Bell Michael Bell on behalf of the MKSP on behalf of the MKSP LOFAR Status Meeting - 9 th February 2011

Transcript of Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

Page 1: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

Polarization Busy Week & Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress Commissioning Progress

Michael BellMichael Bellon behalf of the MKSPon behalf of the MKSP

LOFAR Status Meeting - 9th February 2011

Page 2: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 2

IntroductionIntroduction● In this status update:

● October polarization busy week observations of the pulsar J0218

● Future observing/commissioning plans

● Polarization and RM Synthesis commissioning handled by

● MKSP - http://www.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/staff/rbeck/MKSP/mksp.html

● DFG “Magnetisation of Interstellar and Intergalactic Media - The Prospects of Low-Frequency Radio Observations”

Page 3: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 3

Pol. Busy Week GoalsPol. Busy Week Goals

● Familiarize new MKSP members (there are many) with LOFAR imaging procedures

● Test the current capabilities of LOFAR to do polarimetry (without any calibration...)

● Image a polarized source at known Faraday depth (i.e. RM) ● Track changes in FD & stokes Q,U w/ time● Try to determine variation due to ionospheric

changes (particularly at sunrise/set)

Page 4: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 4

ParticipantsParticipants• Rainer Beck (MPIfR Bonn)• Rene Giessuebel• Andreas Horneffer • Masaya Kuniyoshi• Halime Mir Aghaee• David Mulcahy• Aris Noutsos• Charlotte Sobey• Michael Bell (MPA Garching)• Henrik Junklewitz• Alice Di Vincenzo (TLS Tautenburg)• Matthias Hoef• Jana Koehler• Sandra Schumann

• Marco Iacobelli (Leiden)• Carl Shneider• Wojciech Jurusik (Jagiellonian, Cracow)• Jongsoo Kim (Cambridge)• Arpad Miskolczi (Ruhr Univ, Bochum)• Carlos Sotomayor• Emanuela Orru (Nijmegen)• Rosita Paladino (Univ Innsbruck)• Amrita Purkayastha (Argelander Bonn)• Monica Trasatti• Ger de Bruyn (ASTRON)• Marijke Haverkorn• George Heald• Roberto Pizzo

Page 5: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 5

October 2010 Polarization BWOctober 2010 Polarization BW● 4 X 4 hour observations centered on J0218

● RM = -61 rad/m2

● L2010_20905, 20907, 20909, & 20911 (16:30 to 8:45) ● HBA (110 – 190 MHz)● Averaged channels to ~46 kHz (4 per subband)

● Amounts to ~10-30 deg rotation across the channel● The pulsar is in transit during 20907, this is where most of the work

has been done so far● Also made beamformed observation of 2 polarized pulsars

For more results, see the FORUM thread titled“Polarization Busy Week Oct 2010”

in the Magnetism KSP area

Page 6: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 6

3C66

3C65

NGC0891

The Field

J0218?

Page 7: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 7

Polarization imaged!Polarization imaged!

146.898 MHz Image courtesy Andreas Horneffer

Nearly everyone managed to image the pulsar in Q/U by the end of the week

A few managed to find it in Stokes I as well

Page 8: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 8

Subband VariabilitySubband Variability

SB 108

SB 109

Images courtesy of Halime Mir Aghaee

Page 9: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 9

Time VariabilityTime Variability

SB 108

SB 108, 4 hours laterImages courtesy of Halime Mir Aghaee

Page 10: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 10

Imaging with the PipelineImaging with the Pipeline

● Andreas Horneffer imaged 192 subbands using the pipeline● First the pipeline was run with BBS using a sky model derived

from a single subband● Concatenate groups of subbands into a single Measurement

Set (MS)● Image these MSs & get a new skymodel for each group

(skymodels do not include spectral variation)● Run the pipeline separately for each group, with the different

skymodels and a final imaging and fits-export stage

Page 11: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 11

Faraday spectrumFaraday spectrum● RM measured to be 61 rad/m2

● But pulsar RM is known to be -61 rad/m2... Why the sign error?

● LOFAR dipoles not defined using IAU conventions

● IAU: positive X points north, positive Y to the east

● LOFAR: positive X points SW, Y points SE

● Cross-products of these point in opposite directions... this is the issue?

N EX Y

X x Y

N E

XY

X x YIAU LOFAR

Page 12: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 12

Polarized field at 61 Polarized field at 61 rrad/mad/m22

Images were not CLEANedand were at different resolutions

25:1 signal to noise

Polarized intensity – Jy/Beam/RMSF

Page 13: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 13

1 Hour Time Slices1 Hour Time Slices● Split observations 20907, 20909 into 8x1 hour blocks, Andreas imaged with the

pipeline

● RM doesn't vary much – Carlos Sotomayor found similar results with 17 subbands

Min 60.85 rad/m2

Max 61.05 rad/m2

60.9 rad/m2

Page 14: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 14

Pulsar Intensity Over TimePulsar Intensity Over Time

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 290

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

Pulsar Polarized Intensity

Time (Hours)

Pola

rized

Inte

nsity

(Jy/

Beam

/RM

SF)

Page 15: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 15

Polarized intensity at 0 rad/mPolarized intensity at 0 rad/m22

0 rad/m2

-14 rad/m2

Polarization at 0 rad/m2 a good diagnostic of polarization leakage

3C66

Polarized intensity – Jy/Beam/RMSF

Polarized intensity – Jy/Beam/RMSF

Page 16: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 16

Average pol. intensity Average pol. intensity over time over time for different RM valuesfor different RM values

Averaged over 50 sq. pixels (500x500”)

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 290

0.01

0.01

0.02

0.02

0.03

Average Polarized Intensity

0 rad/m/m-60 rad/m/m150 rad/m/m

Time (Hours)

Pol I

(Jy/

Beam

/RM

SF)

Page 17: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 17

State of Polarimetry w/ LOFARState of Polarimetry w/ LOFAR● We have successfully imaged polarized emission!● Pol. calibration can't be done because

● We're working to find calibrator sources● Beam model in BBS must be tested (correction for elevation

dependent leakage, also needed for absolute PAs)● BBS doesn't deal with differential Faraday rotation over the

channel/between stations● ….

● Currently restricted to sources at high elevation● PA calibrator sources also needed, low priority for now

Page 18: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 18Courtesy of Aris Noutsos

Page 19: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 19Courtesy of Aris Noutsos

Page 20: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 20

Feedback from BW participantsFeedback from BW participantsProblems encountered:1. The software pieces have different logical structures and are hard to use

without continuous checking the Cookbook.2. Software is far too slow.3. Bad solutions of BBS are not deleted, intensive flagging of the calibrated

data is required.4. The pipeline cannot be used extensively and smoothly yet, but is crucial

for deep mapping and even more crucial for the PhDs of our students.

Proposals:1. Someone needs to homogenize the software structure.2. Crucial parameters need to be identified and tasks to test them should

be distributed among our commissioning teams.3. More software engineers are needed. LOFAR should seriously discuss

this, also with international partners.

Page 21: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 21

RM Synthesis PipelineRM Synthesis Pipeline

● Features:● FFT based synthesis● RMCLEAN & Wiener Filter deconvolution for now, more algorithms

developed/tested in the future (Wavelets)● Support for several image formats

● Status:● Most functionality has been implemented, much testing is needed● Last hurdle – I/O! We have been awaiting HDF5 LOFAR data formats,

are moving forward without since there is no delivery date in sight ● Need feedback from community about file types to support (FITS file(s)

or ?, written using CASA or ?) & obtain sample files, extract necessary metadata

Page 22: Polarization Busy Week & Commissioning Progress

9th Feb. 2011 LOFAR Status Meeting 22

Near-term Commissioning PlansNear-term Commissioning Plans● New observation of NGC4631 done last weekend● Recently made joint imaging/beam formed observations of

Jupiter to look for circular polarization. Dynamic spectra show expected results, we'll be imaging/BBS-ing the imaging observations next week.

● Repeat J0218 experiment in pulsar observing mode to determine how station calibration has improved S/N

● Search for extended polarized emission (in e.g. galaxies, the fan region)

● Find calibrator sources (pulsars for now)

Next Pol Busy Week: 21st → 25th March in Bonn