Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges
description
Transcript of Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges
![Page 1: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Point of Connection Methodology
for Sharing of Transmission Charges
![Page 2: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Methodology adopted for Sharing of ISTS Charges
• Hybrid Method
----A combination of Tracing and Marginal Participation methods
![Page 3: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Tracing of Electricity• Based on a paper published by Bialek in 1996
• Requires base case load flow
• Uses concept of proportional flows
• Attempts to identify which generators are supplying which loads
![Page 4: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Marginal Participation
--- changes in line flows due to incremental 1 MW change in generation/load at a node is used to determine the participation of the node on the lines
![Page 5: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The Procedure
• Solve Base case LF on basic network….truncated to 400 kv
• Identification of responding buses-tracing• Increment 1 MW Marginal generation/Load at
desired bus absorbed/generated by responding buses
• Calculate line utilization factors• Allocate costs to nodes• Calculate poc rate/nodal prices
![Page 6: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
slack
Generator #1
Bus 1Bus 2
Bus 4
Bus 5
Bus 3
Line 1
Line 2Line 3
Line 4
Line 5Line 6
1
180 MW
0 Mvar
400 MW
0 Mvar
260 MW
0 Mvar
100 MW
0 Mvar
220 MW
0 Mvar
The LF studies have been done using Power World Simulator evaluation/student edition
![Page 7: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
P out Records: One MW Marginal drawal at Bus 2, Supplied by Generator at Bus 5Bus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 180.00 TO 2 2 1 193.07 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 60.21 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -73.28 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 261.00TO 1 1 1 -193.07 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -67.93 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.00TO 1 1 1 -60.21 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -159.79 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 67.93 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -167.93 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 401.00 TO 1 1 1 73.28 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 159.79 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 167.93 0 0.0
Pout RecordsBase CaseBus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 180.00 0.0TO 2 2 1 192.62 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 60.38 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -73.00 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 260.00TO 1 1 1 -192.62 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -67.38 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.00TO 1 1 1 -60.38 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -159.62 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 67.38 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -167.38 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 400.00 0.0TO 1 1 1 73.00 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 159.62 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 167.38 0 0.0
![Page 8: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
slack
Generator #1
Bus 1Bus 2
Bus 4
Bus 5
Bus 3
Line 1
Line 2Line 3
Line 4
Line 5Line 6
1
180 MW
0 Mvar
400 MW
0 Mvar
260 MW
0 Mvar
100 MW
0 Mvar
220 MW
0 Mvar
60.38 MW
73 MW
192.62 MW
Contribution of 180 MW generator on line 4= 60.38*180/(180+73)= 42.96 MW
![Page 9: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• For a large system -----
• ......... It requires the solution of the [A] matrices.
![Page 10: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
slack
Generator #1
Bus 1Bus 2
Bus 4
Bus 5
Bus 3
Line 1
Line 2Line 3
Line 4
Line 5Line 6
1
180 MW
0 Mvar
400 MW
0 Mvar
260 MW
0 Mvar
100 MW
0 Mvar
220 MW
0 Mvar
P1=253P2=260
P3=220P4=167.38
P5=400
1-2=192.62
1-3=60.38
4-2=67.38
5-4=167.38
5-3=159.62
5-1=73.00
Pi = nodal power at node i = sum of injections = sum of withdrawals
![Page 11: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
From “The Tracing of Electricity” J.Bialek, 1996
• Contribution of Generator k in line outflow in line i-l emanating from node i=
|Pi-l|*[Au-1]ik*PGk/Pi
[Au] ij = 1 if i=j
-|Pj-i|/Pj if j belongs to set of nodes directly
supplying to node i
0 otherwise
![Page 12: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Au Matrix
AuAu Inv
1.000 0 0 0 -0.183 1.000 0 0 0 0.183
-0.759 1.000 0 -0.403 0 0.759 1.000 0 0.403 0.307
-0.239 0 1.000 0 -0.399 0.239 0 1.000 0 0.443
0 0 0 1.000 -0.418 0 0 0.000 1.000 0.418
0 0 0 0 1.000 0 0 0 0 1.000
![Page 13: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
From “The Tracing of Electricity” J.Bialek, 1996
• Contribution of Generator k to Load at node i=
PLi*[Au-1]ik*PGk/Pi
![Page 14: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
From “The Tracing of Electricity” J.Bialek, 1996
• Contribution of Load k in line inflow in line i-j into node i=
|Pi-l|*[Ad-1]ik*PLk/Pi
[Ad] ij = 1 if i=j
-|Pj-i|/Pj if j belongs to set of nodes directly
supplied from node i
0 otherwise
![Page 15: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Ad matrix
AdAd Inv
1.000 -0.741 -0.274 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.741 0.274 0.000 0.000
0 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0 0 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000
0 -0.259 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.259 0.000 1.000 0.000
-0.289 0.000 -0.726 -1.000 1.000 0.289 0.473 0.805 1.000 1.000
![Page 16: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Line1(1-2) Line2(4-2) Line3(5-1) Line4(1-3) Line5(5-3) Line6(5-4)
Generator 1 (MW)
137.04 0 0 42.96 0 0
% 71 0 0 71 0 0
Generator 2(MW)
55.58 67 73 17.42 159.62 167.38
% 29 100 100 29 100 100
Total 192.62 67 73 60.38 159.62 167.38
![Page 17: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Load line contributionLine1(1-2) Line2(4-2) Line3(5-1) Line4(1-3) Line5(5-3) Line6(5-4)
Load (bus2) 192.6 67.38 55.59 0 0 67.38
% 100 100 76 0 0 40
Load (bus 3) 0 0 17.41 60.38 159.62 0
% 0 0 24 100 100 0
load (bus 4) 0 0 0 0 0 100
% 0 0 0 0 0 60
192.6 67.38 73 60.38 159.62 167.38
![Page 18: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Load (bus 2)
Load (bus 3)
Load (bus 4)
Gen 1(bus1)
136.62 43.02 0
% 53 20 0
Gen 2(bus5)
123.38 176.98 100
% 47 80 100
Total 260 220 100
![Page 19: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Increase 1 MW load at Bus 2
……… and as per result of tracing Generator 1 will respond with 53% that is 0.53 MW and Generator 2 will respond with 47% that is 0.47
MW
![Page 20: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
slack
Generator #1
Bus 1Bus 2
Bus 4
Bus 5
Bus 3
Line 1
Line 2Line 3
Line 4
Line 5Line 6
1
181 MW
0 Mvar
400 MW
0 Mvar
261 MW
0 Mvar
100 MW
0 Mvar
220 MW
0 Mvar
![Page 21: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Calculation of Seasonal Index & Marginal Participation Factors
![Page 22: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Seasonal index (for node i line l):
Ue,i,l =(|Flei| - |Fle|).P ie
|Flei| - |Fle| must be >0
![Page 23: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Pout Records: Marginal 1 MW INCR at Bus 2Bus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 180.53 0.0TO 2 2 1 193.33 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 60.31 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -73.11 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 261.00TO 1 1 1 -193.33 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -67.67 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.00TO 1 1 1 -60.31 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -159.69 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 67.67 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -167.67 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 400.47 0.0TO 1 1 1 73.11 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 159.69 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 167.67 0 0.0
Pout RecordsBase CaseBus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 180.00 0.0TO 2 2 1 192.62 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 60.38 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -73.00 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 260.00TO 1 1 1 -192.62 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -67.38 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.00TO 1 1 1 -60.38 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -159.62 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 67.38 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -167.38 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 400.00 0.0TO 1 1 1 73.00 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 159.62 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 167.38 0 0.0
![Page 24: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Line Marginal case
Base case
Ue2l
1-2 193.33 192.62 184.6 Ue2(1-2)
1-3 60.31 60.38 0 Ue2(1-3)
5-1 73.11 73.00 28.6 Ue2(5-1)
4-2 67.67 67.38 75.4 Ue2(4-2)
5-3 159.69 159.62 18.2 Ue2(5-3)
5-4 167.67 167.38 75.4 Ue2(5-4)
Seasonal Index for node 2
Seaslonal index for node 2 on line [1-2] = (193.33-192.62)*260
![Page 25: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Increase 1 MW load at Bus 1
![Page 26: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Pout Records Bus 1 INCR 1 MWBus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 181.00 0.0TO 2 2 1 193.39 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 60.54 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -72.93 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 260.76TO 1 1 1 -193.39 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -67.37 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.24TO 1 1 1 -60.54 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -159.70 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 67.37 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -167.37 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 400.00 0.0TO 1 1 1 72.93 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 159.70 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 167.37 0 0.0
Pout RecordsBase CaseBus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 180.00 0.0TO 2 2 1 192.62 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 60.38 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -73.00 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 260.00TO 1 1 1 -192.62 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -67.38 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.00TO 1 1 1 -60.38 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -159.62 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 67.38 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -167.38 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 400.00 0.0TO 1 1 1 73.00 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 159.62 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 167.38 0 0.0
![Page 27: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Line Marginal case
Base case
Ue1l
1-2 193.39 192.62 138.6 Ue1(1-2)
1-3 60.54 60.38 28.8 Ue1(1-3)
5-1 72.93 73.00 0 Ue1(5-1)
4-2 67.37 67.38 0 Ue1(4-2)
5-3 159.70 159.62 14.4 Ue1(5-3)
5-4 167.37 167.38 0 Ue1(5-4)
Seasonal Index for node 1
![Page 28: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Increase 1 MW load at Bus 3
![Page 29: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Pout Records: 1MW INCR in bus 3 (load)Bus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 1 180.20 0.0TO 2 2 1 192.48 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 60.81 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -73.09 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 260.00TO 1 1 1 -192.48 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -67.52 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 221.00TO 1 1 1 -60.81 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -160.19 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 67.52 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -167.52 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 400.80 0.0TO 1 1 1 73.09 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 160.19 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 167.52 0 0.0
Pout RecordsBase CaseBus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 180.00 0.0TO 2 2 1 192.62 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 60.38 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -73.00 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 260.00TO 1 1 1 -192.62 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -67.38 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.00TO 1 1 1 -60.38 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -159.62 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 67.38 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -167.38 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 400.00 0.0TO 1 1 1 73.00 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 159.62 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 167.38 0 0.0
![Page 30: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Line Marginal case
Base case
Ue3l
1-2 192.48 192.62 0 Ue3(1-2)
1-3 60.81 60.38 94.6 Ue3(1-3)
5-1 73.09 73.00 19.8 Ue3(5-1)
4-2 67.52 67.38 30.8 Ue3(4-2)
5-3 160.19 159.62 125.4 Ue3(5-3)
5-4 167.52 167.38 30.8 Ue3(5-4)
Seasonal Index for node 3
![Page 31: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Increase 1 MW load at Bus 4
![Page 32: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Pout RecordsBase CaseBus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 180.00 0.0TO 2 2 1 192.62 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 60.38 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -73.00 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 260.00TO 1 1 1 -192.62 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -67.38 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.00TO 1 1 1 -60.38 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -159.62 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 67.38 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -167.38 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 400.00 0.0TO 1 1 1 73.00 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 159.62 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 167.38 0 0.0
Pout Records: 1MW INCR Bus 4Bus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 1 180.00 0.0TO 2 2 1 193.01 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 60.23 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -73.24 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 260.00TO 1 1 1 -193.01 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -66.99 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.00TO 1 1 1 -60.23 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -159.77 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 101.00TO 2 2 1 66.99 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -167.99 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 1 401.00 0.0TO 1 1 1 73.24 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 159.77 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 167.99 0 0.0
![Page 33: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Line Marginal case
Base case
Ue4l
1-2 193.01 192.62 39 Ue4(1-2)
1-3 60.23 60.38 0 Ue4(1-3)
5-1 73.24 73.00 24 Ue4(5-1)
4-2 66.99 67.38 0 Ue4(4-2)
5-3 159.77 159.62 15 Ue4(5-3)
5-4 167.99 167.38 61 Ue4(5-4)
Seasonal Index for node 4
![Page 34: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Increase 1 MW load at Bus 5
![Page 35: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Pout Records: bus 5 INCR 1MWBus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 180.00 0.0TO 2 2 1 192.75 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 60.46 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -73.22 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 260.31TO 1 1 1 -192.75 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -67.56 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.44TO 1 1 1 -60.46 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -159.98 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW 1LOAD 1 100.25TO 2 2 1 67.56 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -167.81 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW 1GENERATOR 401.00 0.0TO 1 1 1 73.22 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 159.98 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 167.81 0 0.0
Pout RecordsBase CaseBus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 180.00 0.0TO 2 2 1 192.62 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 60.38 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -73.00 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 260.00TO 1 1 1 -192.62 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -67.38 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.00TO 1 1 1 -60.38 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -159.62 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 67.38 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -167.38 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 400.00 0.0TO 1 1 1 73.00 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 159.62 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 167.38 0 0.0
![Page 36: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Line Marginal case
Base case
Ue4l
1-2 192.75 192.62 52 Ue5(1-2)
1-3 60.46 60.38 32 Ue5(1-3)
5-1 73.22 73.00 88 Ue5(5-1)
4-2 67.56 67.38 72 Ue5(4-2)
5-3 159.98 159.62 144 Ue5(5-3)
5-4 167.81 167.38 172 Ue5(5-4)
Seasonal Index for node 5
![Page 37: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Marginal Participation Factor( of node i in line l):
Ueil / ∑i Ueil
![Page 38: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Node/bus 1
Bus 2 Bus 3 Bus 4 Bus 5
Line
1-2
0.3346 0.4457 0 .0941 0.1255
1-3 0.1853 0 0.6088 0 0.2059
1-5 0 0.1783 0.1234 0.1496 0.5486
2-4 0 0.4231 0.1728 0 0.4040
3-5 0.0454 0.0574 0.3956 0.0473 0.4543
4-5 0 0.2223 0.0908 0.1798 0.5071
![Page 39: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
slack
Generator #1
Bus 1Bus 2
Bus 4
Bus 5
Bus 3
Line 1
Line 2Line 3
Line 4
Line 5Line 6
1
180 MW
0 Mvar
400 MW
0 Mvar
260 MW
0 Mvar
100 MW
0 Mvar
220 MW
0 Mvar
Zone A
![Page 40: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Line Cost Information
Line from bus to bus length in KM Cost of line (in Crs)
1 1 2 160 160
2 2 4 112 112
3 1 5 200 200
4 1 3 80 80
5 3 5 152 152
6 4 5 99 99
Total=803 Cr
Line cost considered as 1 crore/km for indicative purposes only
![Page 41: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Calculation of Uniform Charges
= Total Transmission Charges/(Sum of approved Injection+Sum of approved Withdrawal)
=803/(400+180+220+260+100)
=69.22 lakhs/MW
For bus 1 =(69.22*180)=125 Cr
For bus 2=(69.22*260) =180 Cr
For bus 3=(69.22*220) =152 Cr
For bus 4=(69.22*100) = 69 Cr
For bus 5=(69.22*400) =277 Cr
![Page 42: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Cost allocation to nodes based on marginal participation
Nodes Marginal Participation case(Cost in Rs Cr)
Uniform Charges(Cost in Rs Cr)
50 % Marginal Participation 50% Uniform Charges
PoC ratesRs Lakh /MW/month
Node/Bus 1
75 125 100 4.62
Node/Bus 2
185 180 182.5 5.85
Node/Bus 3
162 152 157 5.95
Node/Bus 4
70 69 69.5 5.79
Node/Bus 5
311 277 294 6.13
Total 803 803 803
![Page 43: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Generator shares
Generator
Loads
Generator Node 1% share
Generator Node 5% share
Load bus 2 10 50
Load bus 3 30 30
Load bus 4 60 20
![Page 44: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Nodes
MP-Trace
UC 50 % MP & 50% UC
PoC ratesRs Lakh /MW /month
Monthly Charges to be paid Rs Lakhs/month based on share
Monthly Charges to be paid Rs Lakhs/month based on trace
Node/Bus 1
75 125 100 4.62(3.47)
Generator node
Node/Bus 2
185 180 182.5 5.85(5.93)
2830
2905
Node/Bus 3
162 152 157 5.95(6.14)
2294
2596
Node/Bus 4
70 69 69.5 5.79(5.83)
1568
1192
Node/Bus 5
311 277 294 6.13(6.48)
Generator node
Total 803 803 803Charges to be paid = own drawal*drawal PoC of node+share*generator capacity*injection PoC of generator bus(Figures in brackets are based on MP-Trace only)
![Page 45: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Present Issues
![Page 46: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
• There is no internationally adopted best common method for allocation of transmission costs….. All methods have their pros & cons
• Worldwide a combination of methods is used for allocation such as postage stamp, marginal/nodal pricing, marginal participation, average participation, MW-Mile, peak based, game theory etc
• Requires not only technical expertise but also Econimics concepts such as marginal price, social welfare, etc
![Page 47: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
• While postage stamp method is the most easiest to understand, it does not capture the congestion costs.
• While marginal participation has some degree of technical backing it is complex to understand and implement
• Selection of slack bus/responding nodes in marginal participation is a contentious issue.
![Page 48: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
• While we are rightly concerned with congestion. What if there is over capacity/stranded assets in a corridor? What if the constructed lines remain lightly loaded for most part of the year due to error in planning or change in load generation scenario over time? What is the limit of reliability costs?
![Page 49: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
• In Flow based methods the base case load generation is very important….. More so when the tariff of assets vary widely
• 50 % Uniform charges distort the locational signals
• Slabbing further distorts the results of marginal participation
![Page 50: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
• Whether a generator/supplier or Load/Consumer is to be penalized for its geographical location?
-----generation zones are predetermined based on availability of resources
----load zones/industrial belts are also result of historical development, resource availability
• Whether generator or Consumer be penalized due to asymmetries in transmission network created during historical development of ISTS ?
![Page 51: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Future Concerns
• Integration of Renewables in the Grid
---run of the river hydro, wind and solar run on very low PLF. However, transmission must be developed for entire capacity.
---higher transmission cost/unit due to low PLF which is not under the control of generator may result in disincentive for growth of renewables
![Page 52: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
• The issue of integration of renewables is being debated worldwide now
• Can such transmission projects be funded by Government under NAPCC?
![Page 53: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Changes in Sharing Regulations contemplated in the third amendment regulations
![Page 54: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
• Transmission charges to be calculated based on peak scenario rather than average scenario
---In selecting those operating scenarios it is important to recognise that the operating conditions that impose most stress on particular network elements may occur at times other than for system peak demand.
![Page 55: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
• Discontinuation of uniform charges
• Discontinuation of slabbing
• Computation based on full basic network rather than truncated network
• Proportional compensation for use of state lines carrying interstate power
![Page 56: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
PoC charges under peak conditions
![Page 57: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
slack
Generator #1
Bus 1Bus 2
Bus 4
Bus 5
Bus 3
Line 1
Line 2Line 3
Line 4
Line 5Line 6
1
180 MW
0 Mvar
530 MW
0 Mvar
390 MW 0 Mvar
100 MW
0 Mvar
220 MW
0 Mvar
![Page 58: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Pout Records: NEW BASE CASE::150% peak drawal at node/bus-2---supplied by generator node 5Bus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 180.00 0.0TO 2 2 1 251.79 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 37.27 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -109.06 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 390.00TO 1 1 1 -251.79 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -138.21 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.00TO 1 1 1 -37.27 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -182.73 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 138.21 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -238.21 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 530.00 0.0TO 1 1 1 109.06 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 182.73 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 238.21 0 0.0
![Page 59: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Load (bus 2)
Load (bus 3)
Load (bus 4)
Gen 1(bus1)
156.78 23.22 0
% 40 11 0
Gen 2(bus5)
232.74 197.26 100
% 60 89 100
Total 390 220 100
![Page 60: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Pout Records: NEW BASE CASE::150% peak drawal at node/bus-2Bus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 180.00 0.0TO 2 2 1 251.79 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 37.27 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -109.06 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 390.00TO 1 1 1 -251.79 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -138.21 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.00TO 1 1 1 -37.27 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -182.73 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 138.21 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -238.21 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 530.00 0.0TO 1 1 1 109.06 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 182.73 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 238.21 0 0.0
Pout Records:: INCR 1 MW at bus 1Bus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 181.00 0.0TO 2 2 1 252.64 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 37.37 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -109.01 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 390.87TO 1 1 1 -252.64 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -138.23 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.13TO 1 1 1 -37.37 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -182.76 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 138.23 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -238.23 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 530.00 0.0TO 1 1 1 109.01 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 182.76 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 238.23 0 0.0
![Page 61: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Pout Records: NEW BASE CASE::150% peak drawal at node/bus-2Bus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 180.00 0.0TO 2 2 1 251.79 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 37.27 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -109.06 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 390.00TO 1 1 1 -251.79 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -138.21 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.00TO 1 1 1 -37.27 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -182.73 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 138.21 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -238.21 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 530.00 0.0TO 1 1 1 109.06 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 182.73 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 238.21 0 0.0
Pout Records:: INCR 1 MW at bus 2Bus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0GENERATOR 180.40 0.0TO 2 2 1 252.44 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 37.17 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -109.21 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MWLOAD 1 391.00TO 1 1 1 -252.44 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -138.56 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MWLOAD 1 220.00TO 1 1 1 -37.17 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -182.83 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MWLOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 138.56 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -238.56 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MWGENERATOR 530.60 0.0TO 1 1 1 109.21 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 182.83 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 238.56 0 0.0
![Page 62: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Pout Records: NEW BASE CASE::150% peak drawal at node/bus-2Bus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 180.00 0.0TO 2 2 1 251.79 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 37.27 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -109.06 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 390.00TO 1 1 1 -251.79 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -138.21 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.00TO 1 1 1 -37.27 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -182.73 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 138.21 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -238.21 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 530.00 0.0TO 1 1 1 109.06 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 182.73 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 238.21 0 0.0
Pout Records:: 1 MW INCR at Bus 3Bus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 1 180.11 0.0TO 2 2 1 251.61 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 37.68 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -109.18 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 390.00TO 1 1 1 -251.61 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -138.39 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 221.00TO 1 1 1 -37.68 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -183.32 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 138.39 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -238.39 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 1 530.89 0.0TO 1 1 1 109.18 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 183.32 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 238.39 0 0.0
![Page 63: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Pout Records: NEW BASE CASE::150% peak drawal at node/bus-2Bus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 180.00 0.0TO 2 2 1 251.79 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 37.27 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -109.06 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 390.00TO 1 1 1 -251.79 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -138.21 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.00TO 1 1 1 -37.27 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -182.73 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 138.21 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -238.21 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 530.00 0.0TO 1 1 1 109.06 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 182.73 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 238.21 0 0.0
Pout RecordsBus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MWGENERATOR 1 180.00 0.0TO 2 2 1 252.19 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 37.11 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -109.30 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MWLOAD 1 390.00TO 1 1 1 -252.19 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -137.81 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MWLOAD 1 220.00TO 1 1 1 -37.11 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -182.89 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MWLOAD 1 101.00TO 2 2 1 137.81 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -238.81 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MWGENERATOR 531.00 0.0TO 1 1 1 109.30 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 182.89 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 238.81 0 0.0
![Page 64: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Pout Records: NEW BASE CASE::150% peak drawal at node/bus-2Bus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 180.00 0.0TO 2 2 1 251.79 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 37.27 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -109.06 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 390.00TO 1 1 1 -251.79 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -138.21 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.00TO 1 1 1 -37.27 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -182.73 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MW LOAD 1 100.00TO 2 2 1 138.21 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -238.21 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MW GENERATOR 530.00 0.0TO 1 1 1 109.06 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 182.73 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 238.21 0 0.0
Pout RecordsBus FlowsBUS 1 1 400.0 MW GENERATOR 1 180.00 0.0TO 2 2 1 251.98 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 37.30 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -109.29 0 0.0
BUS 2 2 400.0 MW LOAD 1 390.44TO 1 1 1 -251.98 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 -138.46 0 0.0
BUS 3 3 400.0 MW LOAD 1 220.37TO 1 1 1 -37.30 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -183.07 0 0.0
BUS 4 4 400.0 MWLOAD 1 100.19TO 2 2 1 138.46 0 0.0TO 5 5 1 -238.65 0 0.0
BUS 5 5 400.0 MWGENERATOR 531.00 0.0TO 1 1 1 109.29 0 0.0TO 3 3 1 183.07 0 0.0TO 4 4 1 238.65 0 0.0
![Page 65: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Node/bus 1
Bus 2 Bus 3 Bus 4 Bus 5
Line
1-2 0.280 0.463 0.000 0.073 0.1841-3
0.145 0.000 0.727 0.000 0.1281-5
0.000 0.253 0.114 0.104 0.5282-4
0.012 0.437 0.127 0.000 0.4243-5
0.015 0.105 0.350 0.043 0.4874-5
0.008 0.289 0.084 0.127 0.493
![Page 66: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Marginal Line Participation Factors peak case and earlier/average case for line 1--2
![Page 67: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Total charges allocated to nodes peak case earlier case
![Page 68: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Tabulated data for earlier case and peak case
Node Earlier cost allocated to node
Peak scenario cost
% change
Earlier cost/ Lakh/MW/monthMP
Earlier cost/ Lakh/MW/monthMP+UC
Peak Scenario cost/ Lakh/MW/month
1 75 61 18.66 3.47 4.62 2.82
2 185 218 17.83 5.93 5.85 4.66
3 162 157 3.08 6.14 5.95 5.94
4 70 51 27.14 5.83 5.79 4.25
5 311 316 1.61 6.48 6.13 4.97
While the load at bus 2 had increased 1.5 times the total cost allocated to the node has increased only 1.18 times( 1.19 for MP+UC)cost/MW/Month will go down (as MW increased). New entrants/ST customers incentivizedCharges allocated to a node will change only if due to it flow in different lines change. Otherwise the charge may remain same under peak scenario also. May also reduce.
![Page 69: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
From CERC sharing of ISTS charges (third amendment) draft
![Page 70: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
TABLE 2
DIC Withdrawal/Load PoC Charges
Scaled PoC Charges
X 45,79,42,697 50,45,52,461
Y 18,96,39,554 20,89,41215
![Page 71: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
TABLE 3Zone Uniform Charges
(UC)\(Rs./Month)=Uniform Rate*LTA
Scaled PoC
Charges
Rs/Month
50% UC and
50% PoC
Rs./Month
LTA (MW) Withdrawal
Charges
(Rs/MW/Month)
X 25,22,12,087 50,45,52,461 37,83,82,274 2,668 1,41,822
Y 16,44,90,088 20,89,41,215 18,66,46,847 1,741 1,07,280
50.46/20.89= 2.42 ; 37.84/18.66 = 2.07
![Page 72: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
TABLE- 4
DICDrawal
(MW)
LTA
(MW)Slab Rate
(Rs/MW/Month)
Actual Usage
(Rs/ Month)
Payment
(Rs/ Month) Variation
X 4989 2668 1,09,544 45,79,42,697 29,22,63,392 (-) 36.2%
Y 1414 1741 1,09,544 18,96,39,554 19,07,16,104 0.56%
50.46/20.89= 2.42 ; 37.84/18.66 = 2.07 ; 29.23/19.07 = 1.53 ??
![Page 73: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
TABLE-5
Zone Generation
(MW)Load (MW)
Generation Charges
(Rs.)
Load Charges
(MW)
LTA (Generation)
(MW)
LTA (Demand)
(MW)
Generation PoC
(Rs./MW/
Month)
Load PoC
(Rs./MW/
Month)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
Z 19429
2916016,64,638
2,160,51,386
280 4784 5945 45166
![Page 74: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
TABLE-6
Zone
Generation PoC
(Rs./MW/
Month)
Load PoC
(Rs./MW/
Month)
Generation PoC
(Rs./MW/
Month)
Load PoC
(Rs./MW/
Month)
Generation PoC
(Rs./MW/
Month)
Load PoC
(Rs./MW/
Month)
Generation PoC
(Rs./MW/
Month)
Load PoC
(Rs./MW/
Month)
Software Computed LTA BasedAfter 50% Uniform
charge and 50% PoC application
After Slabs
Z 8,594 74,229 5,945 45,166 50,547 72,154 79,544 79,544
![Page 75: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
TABLE-7
Sl.No. State /DIC % Allocation
1 BIHAR 42.89%
2 JHARKHAND 8.13%
3 DVC 0.31%
4 ODISHA 31.8% plus temp allocation
5 WEST BENGAL 9.1% plus temp allocation
6 SIKKIM 2.4
7 TAMIL NADU 0.85%
8 NER 3.22%
![Page 76: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
TABLE-8
Sl.No. State /DIC % as per participation factor
1 ODISHA 82.97
3 DVC 12.1
5 WEST BENGAL 4.93
![Page 77: Point of Connection Methodology for Sharing of Transmission Charges](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813e75550346895da88ca6/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Thank you