Point: Counterpoint Exercise vs Intervention for Recalcitrant Tendinopathy Ken Mautner, MD Emory...
-
Upload
jemimah-strickland -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
1
Transcript of Point: Counterpoint Exercise vs Intervention for Recalcitrant Tendinopathy Ken Mautner, MD Emory...
Point: CounterpointExercise vs Intervention for
Recalcitrant TendinopathyKen Mautner, MD
Emory Sports Medicine Center
Harmon K G , and Rao A L Hematology 2013;2013:620-626
©2013 by American Society of Hematology
The Continuum of Tendinopathy
20-25% do not get better with consesrvative tx- PT, etc
What to do with them ??
Patella tendon even worse?
Insertional achilles/ HS tendon ?
Before we get started…….
Rehabilitation is the cornerstone of any successful treatment for tendinopathy
Eccentric exercise programs have a proven track record to be successful in treatment of tendinosis, especially Achilles tendon
There are other modalities that are not going to be discussed here that also have some efficacy in the treatment of tendinosis STM (CFM, Graston, ASTYM) NO patches ECSWT
In most cases, interventions should be reserved for tendons that have failed appropriate conservative/ less invasive treatments
However ….
20-25% of recalcitrant tendinopathy does not get better with optimal rehabilitation Rigorous program to be compliant Outside of Achilles tendon, results may be
even worse
Certain body regions seem to do even worse with traditional care: Insertional Achilles tendinosis Proximal Patella tendinosis Proximal HS tendinosis
“There is strong evidence that PRP injections are not efficacious in the management of chronic lateral elbow tendinopathy”
”The current evidence suggests that PRP may be of benefit over standard treatment as a second line intervention…the current evidence is promising but limited”
BJSM, Feb 2014
Arthroscopy, Nov, 2013
“God heals, and the doctor takes the fees”
“The art of medicine involves amusing the patient while nature takes it course”
Plt lysate
Cytokin
es
PltConcentr.
Lidocaine
Thrombi
n
WBC’
s
pH
Needl
e
RBC’s
Orthokin
e
??
?? Intervention for
Tendinopathy
ACP
CaCL
Marcaine
Dexamethasone
Ropivicaine
Autologous Blood
Dextrose
Rehabilitation
Corticosteroids Injectionsfor Tendinopathy ?
Lancet, 2010
Corticosteroid InjectionsLancet, 2010
JAMA, 2013
JAMA, 2013
Among patients with chronic unilateral lateral epicondylalgia, the use of corticosteroid injection vs placebo injection resulted in worse clinical outcomes after 1 year.
Physiotherapy did not result in any significant differences .
Interventional guided treatment for calcific tendinopathy of the shoulder?
Rotator Cuff Calcific Tendinopathy
Intratendinous calcification Hydroxyapetite crystal
Supraspinatus (>50%) > Infraspinatus > Subscapularis
Uncertain Etiology Degenerative Reactive
Females > males
Age 30-50 most common
Seen on 7.5-20% of radiographs Speed et al, 1999 NEJM
Calcific Tendinopathy (RTC)
Process may be blocked
Studies
Several non-controlled studies from 1995-2005 showing good – excellent results with US guided aspiration and lavage 60-74% success rate from published
studies
American Journal Of Roentgenology, 2007
67 consecutive pts treated and evaluated up till 1 year after treatment
91% of shoulders had substantial or complete improvement
64% with perfect motion 89% complete or near complete
resolution of calcifications 44% transient recurrence in symptoms
(around 6 wks after procedure)
Radiology, 2009
Rotator Cuff Calcific Tendonitis: short term and 10 year outcome after 2 needle US guided percutaneous treatment- non randomized controlled trial
219 treated
68 refused treatment – control group
1 treatment performed with 16g needle and 2 needles
Shoulder Function Scores (Constant)
Serafini G et al. Radiology 2009;252:157-164 Scores 1 mo- 73.2Scores 1 yr - 91.7
VAS scores
Serafini G et al. Radiology 2009;252:157-164VAS 1 mo- 4.8VAS 1 yr- 2.7
Joint Bone Spine, 2009 102 pts
53 did not improve with steroid injection
Arthroscopic removal (20) vs PNT/aspiration (16) vs Control (17)
At 4 month f/u > 70% improvement
PNT 62% vs Scope 65% > 90% improvement
PNT-48% vs Scope 8%
2 year f/u Arthroscopy = PNT group >> Control
PNT/aspiration equal or better than Scope
Is Rehabilitation Effective for Tendinopathy?
BJSM, Ocotober, 2012
Systematic review of the relationship between observable structural changes and clinical outcomes following response to therapeutic exercise 20 studies with 625 patients included
CONCLUSIONS: “The available literature does not
support observable structural changes as an explanation for the response to therapeutic exercise when treated by eccentric exercise training”
NEED ANOTHER STUDY HERE
Conclusion:
“Limited evidence exists to suggest that EE has a positive effect on clinical outcomes such as pain, function, and patient satisfaction/ return to work when compared to various control interventions such as concentric exercises, stretching, splinting, friction, and ultrasound.”
“ This review demonstrates a dearth of high quality research in support of the clinical effectiveness of EE over other treatments in the management of tendinopathies. Further adequate powered studies…. Are required”
Does needling a tendon lead to healing?
Basic science of needling
Eliasson et al, 2013, FASEB Needling an unloaded rat Achilles tendon
induced same gene expression as early mechanical loading Mechanical loading may heal, at least in part,
by micro trauma
Dallaudiere et al, 2013, Eur Radiology, RCT on rat model of PRP vs Serum Had clinically significant improvement in
PRP group vs serum group on joint motion, ultrasound appearance, and histology Tendon healing demonstrated as opposed to
just clinical pain relief
COULD USE MORE DATA HERE
Early literature on ultrasound guided needle tenotomy for lateral epicondylosis
McShane et al, Journal of Ultrasound Med. 2006
Ultrasound guided PNT with steroid for chronic lat. epicondylitis Failed conservative tx
58 pts-- avg f/u 28 mo. 80 % Good or Excellent
Outcome
85% would refer friend or family for procedure
McShane et al, Journal of Ultrasound Med 2008
Ultrasound guided PNT without steroid for chronic lat. Epicondylitis Failed conservative tx
57 pts --avg f/u 22 mo. 92% Good or Excellent
Outcome
90% would refer friend or close relative for procedure
PRP for chronic lateral epicondylosis
140 pts evaluated for lateral epicondylosis 20 had refractory pain an avg. of 15 months later
15 in treatment group, 5 in bupivicaine control group
Intervention– Injection w/ autologous PRP once into common extensor
tendon followed by gradual increase in rehab program through 4 weeks after which full activity allowed
Outcome– A 46%, 60% and 81% improvement in VAS pain scores at
1, 2 and 6 months respectively in tx group– 3/5 in bupivicaine group withdrew/ sought other tx– At final F/U (12-38 months) 93% pain free (<10/100 VAS)– No complications, no one got worse
AJSM, 2006
13 RCT included in the study 886 patients 53.8% with identical PRP protocol
Areas of controversy Different comparators Outcome scores FU periods Diverse injection protocols
Conclusion: Pooling pain outcomes over time suggest that L+PRP
ameliorates pain in the intermediate and long term compared with control interventions
Low power, precision Further studies needed
British Medical Bulletin, 2014
Why are we still debating if orthobiologics works?
Need to define what we are injecting ? Platelet concentration MSC concentration Leukocyte count RBC +/ RBC – Autologous/ allogenic
Need to define the procedure US guidance Needle tenotomy performed ?
How many needle passes ?
Rehabilitation methods Need to be studied/ validated Immobilization Timing of eccentrics
May need to separate out different body parts
First double blind, placebo controlled, RCT on PRP 54 randomized patients age 18 to 70 with chronic
(at least 2 mo) achilles tendon pain 2 to 7 cm above calcaneus
Either 6cc PRP or Saline was injected with US guidance into achilles tendon
Rehab for both groups involved rest and then after 2 weeks, started on 12 week daily (180 repetitions) eccentric exercise program
No sports for at least 4 weeks and then only if pain <=3/10
f/u questionnaire at weeks 6,12,24 (6 mo)
JAMA, January 13, 2010
AJSM, 2011
AJSM, 2011
DISCUSSION Both groups were treated with eccentrics
AFTER treatment; NONE treated before treatment Big confounder in study
Eccentrics done early (started at 2 wks) Both groups improved
Needle? Saline? Placebo? Eccentric Exercises?
RCT-- ABI(n= 70) vs PRP (n=80) 2 injections done 1 month apart
All patients had FAILED an eccentric loading program and stretching program
At 6 mo 66% success rate in PRP group
10% converted to surgery
72%success rate in ABI group 20% converted to surgery
BJSM, 2011
Double blind RCT with 1 year follow up of 100 pts
No ultrasound guidance was used
Success defined as >25% reduction in VAS or DASH score
RESULTS At 1 yr, 49% of CSI group and 73% in PRP group
were
successful (p<.001)
AJSM, Feb, 2010
AJSM, March 2011
46 patients RCT- PRP vs CSI to lateral epicondyle
METHODS N = 60 PRP vs Saline vs glucocorticoid (+
Lidocaine) Primary end point - change in pain using
Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) at 3 months
Secondary Outcomes - were ultrasonographic changes in tendon thickness and color Doppler activity
AJSM, 2013
Main Outcome:Neither injection of PRP nor glucocorticoid was superior to saline with regard to pain reduction in LE at 3 months
Comparison of studies
Results of PRP can not be adequately measured with only 3 months follow-up
PRP
CSI
CSI
PRPKrogh
Ferrero
Is it the Needle?
AJSM, 2013
2 PNT vs 2 PRP injections under US guidance for RTC tendinosis or small, partial tear
Measured results using Shoulder Pain and Disability Index Baseline 2wks after 1st injection Right before second injection 2 wks after second injection 3 months 6 months
Clinical Rehabilitation, 2012
Pts age 16-70 (avg 48 yrs)
Greater than 6 months of pain (avg 36 months)
Diagnosed by clinical exam plus MRI or diagnostic US
ALL had Failed conventional treatments (not controlled) Medications Bracing Stretching
PRP done under US guidance
Patients either sent to PT or instructed to do HEP after treatment
PMR journal, 2013
• Strengthening• CFM• Modalities
Distribution of Tendons
Lateral Epicondyle 30
Patella Tendon 27
Achilles 27
Rotator Cuff 21
Hamstring17
Gluteus Medius16
Medial Epicondyle11
Plantar Fascia 9
13 other tendons<5 each
Overall Improvement
82% reported moderate to complete improvement
– 50%- 100% relief of symptoms70 % reported mostly to complete improvement
-- 75-100% relief of symptomsNO difference in outcomes in those who did PT vs No Therapy after treatment.
RCT with 43 patients randomized to 1 of 3 groups 12 week Eccentric training protocol
(15) Prolotherapy with hypertonic glucose/
lidocaine (14) Combination of both EE + Prolo (14)
Outcomes looked at Pain Function Stiffness/ limiation of activities Cost
BJSM, 2009
Long term efficacy similar in all 3 groups, but ELE combined with prolo gave more rapid improvement in symptoms.
Cost effectiveness analysis shows that ELEs was the lowest cost treatment, but when combined with prolotherapy, the cost per additional responder was exceptionally good value for money
Take Home points
There are a certain percentage of tendons that will not improve with rehabilitation alone
Corticosteroids offer only short term improvement in tendinosis and may provide long term detriment
Level 1 studies demonstrating lavage/ aspiration of calcific tendinosis of shoulder is a successful intervention
Basic science suggests that needling a tendon can lead to a healing response
Emerging data that US guided needle tenotomy +/- PRP is successful for recalcitrant tendinopathies