(PLUMBER) Summary and ongoing work · The PALS Land sUrface Model Benchmarking Evaluaon pRoject...
Transcript of (PLUMBER) Summary and ongoing work · The PALS Land sUrface Model Benchmarking Evaluaon pRoject...
ThePALSLandsUrfaceModelBenchmarkingEvalua<onpRoject
(PLUMBER)
Summaryandongoingwork
GabAbramowitzUNSWSydney&ARCCSS
Mar<nBest,NedHaughton,MartynClark,AnnaUkkola,AndyPitman,DaniOr+otherPLUMBERcoauthors:H.Johnson,G.Balsamo,E.Blyth,ABoone,P.
Dirmeyer,J.Dong,M.Ek,Z.Guo,V.Haverd,B.vandenHurk,H.Kim,R.Koster,S.Kumar,G.Nearing,T.Oki,B.Pak,C.Peters-Liddard,A.Pitman,J.Polcher,J.
Santanello,L.Stevens,P.Viterbo,N.Vuichard,…
Expandedexample:ThePALSLandsUrfaceModelBenchmarkingEvalua<onpRoject(PLUMBER)
• 20Fluxtowersites;latentandsensibleheat,• 4metrics:bias,correla<on,SD,normalisedmeanerror• 9LSMs,15LSMversions• Benchmarks:two‘physical’–PMandManabebucket;3empirical
Best et al, 2015
ThethreeempiricalbenchmarksinPLUMBER
• All3empiricalmodelsrelatemetforcingandaflux
• Trainedwithdatafromsitesotherthanthetes<ngsite(i.e.outofsample)
• TheyareeachcreatedforLE,H:o “1lin”:linearregressionoffluxagainstdownwardshortwave(SW)
o “2lin”:asabovebutagainstSWandsurfaceairtemperature(T)
o “3km27”:non-linearregression–27-nodek-meansclustering+linearregressionagainstSW,Tandrela<vehumidityateachnode
• Allareinstantaneousresponsestometvariableswithnoknowledgeofvegeta<ontype,soiltype,soilmoistureortemperature,Cpools.
PLUMBERresults
Ver<calaxisistherankofeachLSM(black)againstthe5benchmarks,averagedover:• 20Fluxtowersites–9IGBPvegeta<ontypes;• 4metrics:bias,correla<on,SD,normalisedmeanerror
• Onaverage,LSMsoutperformPenman-MonteithandManabebucketimplementa<ons• Onaverage,LSMssensibleheatpredic<onisworsethananout-of-samplelinear
regressionagainstdownwardSWradia<on• Forallfluxes,modelsarecomfortablybeatenbyout-of-sampleregressionagainst
Swdown,TairandRelHum
Best et al, 2015, J Hydromet.
• Lackoffluxtowerenergyconserva<onadvantagingempiricalmodels?
• Timescale–daily,monthly,seasonalratherthanper<mestepperformance?
• Timeofday–diurnalbiasesinfluxtowerfavouringempiricalmodels?
• PoorLSMini<alisa<on?
• Areranksnotrepresenta<veofmetricvalues?
• Biasedbymetricchoice?
• Biasedbysitechoice?
PLUMBERresults–methodology?
PLUMBERresults–why?Notenergyconserva<on.
• Constraineachempiricalmodeltohavethesamesumof(latent+sensible)heatfluxastheLSMatevery<mestep
– Eachempiricalmodeltheneffec<velyhasthesameRnetandgroundheatfluxastheLSMit’sbeingcomparedto–andconservesenergy.
• ResultsaremixedbuttheregressionagainstSWdown,TairandRelHums<llcomesoutontop,especiallyforsensibleheatflux.
Haughton et al, 2016
PLUMBERresults–sharedmodelissues?
Haughton et al, 2016
PLUMBERresults–sharedmodelissues?
Qh error, binned by (RelHum, SWdown,)
LSMs
PLUMBERresults–sharedmodelissues?
Qh error, binned by (Swdown, Tair)
LSMs
Canwebuildabemerempiricalmodel?
MartynClark:PLUMBERmodelswithinaBudykoframework
• TheBudykoframeworkexamineshowthedrynessindex(PET/P)affectstheevapora<vefrac<on(ET/P).
• Thesta<s<calmodelstendtobelowerthantheBudykocurveforthewemersitesandhigherthantheBuykocurvesforthedriersites.
• Atdriersitesthesta<s<calmodelscanhaveETgreaterthanP(i.e.,anevapora<vefrac<ongreaterthan1).
• Approach– RMSEacrossthe20fluxnetsites
– Impactofthesmallsamplesizeischaracterizedbyresamplingthesites(withreplacement)1000<mes
• Results– Mostofthelandmodels
actuallyoutperformthesta<s<calmodels.
– TheBudykocurveprovidesbemerpredic<onsthanmostofthelandmodels,sugges<ngthatthelandmodelsareincapableofpredic<ngdeparturesfromtheBudykocurve.
• TheconclusionsofPLUMBERs<llhold,withasimplemodel(Budyko)outperformingmostlandmodels.
MartynClark:PLUMBERmodelswithinaBudykoframework
Dry-downeventsatPLUMBERsites(AnnaUkkola)
Ukkola et al, in press, ERL
Evapora<vedroughtatPLUMBERsites
Ukkola et al, in press, ERL
020
4060
a) DurationAm
pler
o0
2550
75
Blod
gett
040
8012
0
Espi
rra0
6012
018
0
Howa
rd S
prin
gs0
3060
90
Mopa
ne
CABL
E−SL
ICA
BLE−
GWCA
BLE−
2.0CH
TESS
ELCO
LASS
iB.2.
0IS
BA−d
ifIS
BA−3
LJU
LES−
3.1JU
LES−
altP
Mosa
icNO
AH 2.
7NO
AH 3.
2NO
AH 3.
3OR
CHID
EE
CABL
E−SL
ICA
BLE−
GWCA
BLE−
2.0CH
TESS
ELCO
LASS
iB.2.
0IS
BA−d
ifIS
BA−3
LJU
LES−
3.1JU
LES−
altP
Mosa
icNO
AH 2.
7NO
AH 3.
2NO
AH 3.
3OR
CHID
EE
080
160
240
Palan
g
08
1624
b) Magnitude
012
2436
025
5075
060
120
180
05
1015
CABL
E−SL
ICA
BLE−
GWCA
BLE−
2.0CH
TESS
ELCO
LASS
iB.2.
0IS
BA−d
ifIS
BA−3
LJU
LES−
3.1JU
LES−
altP
Mosa
icNO
AH 2.
7NO
AH 3.
2NO
AH 3.
3OR
CHID
EE
CABL
E−SL
ICA
BLE−
GWCA
BLE−
2.0CH
TESS
ELCO
LASS
iB.2.
0IS
BA−d
ifIS
BA−3
LJU
LES−
3.1JU
LES−
altP
Mosa
icNO
AH 2.
7NO
AH 3.
2NO
AH 3.
3OR
CHID
EE
070
140
210
00.2
0.40.6
c) Intensity
00.2
0.40.6
00.3
0.60.9
00.5
11.5
00.0
70.1
40.2
1CA
BLE−
SLI
CABL
E−GW
CABL
E−2.0
CHTE
SSEL
COLA
SSiB
.2.0
ISBA
−dif
ISBA
−3L
JULE
S−3.1
JULE
S−alt
PMo
saic
NOAH
2.7
NOAH
3.2
NOAH
3.3
ORCH
IDEE
CABL
E−SL
ICA
BLE−
GWCA
BLE−
2.0CH
TESS
ELCO
LASS
iB.2.
0IS
BA−d
ifIS
BA−3
LJU
LES−
3.1JU
LES−
altP
Mosa
icNO
AH 2.
7NO
AH 3.
2NO
AH 3.
3OR
CHID
EE
00.8
1.62.4
OngoingworkaroundPLUMBER
• NedHaughton(UNSWSydney,+Gab)–howgoodcanempiricalmodelsbe?– Con<nuingtolookforanuber-modelusingallmetvariables,fluxhistory,markovchain
approachetc– Buildinconserva<on?
• MartynClark(UCAR)–inves<ga<ngPLUMBERwithSUMMAmodellingarchitecture
• Mar<nBesthasmen<onedwan<ngtousePLUMBERdataforsomekindoffrequencydomainanalysis
PLUMBERresults–<mescale?
Haughton et al, 2016
PLUMBERresults–<meofday?
Haughton et al, 2016
PLUMBERresults–ini<alisa<on?"
Haughton et al, 2016
PLUMBERresults–ranksvsmetricvalues?"
Haughton et al, J Hydromet, in review
PLUMBERresults–metric?
Haughton et al, 2016
PLUMBERresults–sites?
Haughton et al, J Hydromet, in review