Plasticity 2012

42
Plasticity How are synapse number & strength adjusted? anatomical evidence electrophysiological evidence Elimination of synapses during development Visual deprivation The role of spontaneous activity Sensory experience: activity influences synaptic connections Activity-dependent synaptic depression Calcium and NMDA receptors Mechanisms of synaptic plasticity

Transcript of Plasticity 2012

Page 1: Plasticity 2012

Plasticity How are synapse number & strength adjusted?

anatomical evidence

electrophysiological evidence

Elimination of synapses during development

Visual deprivation

The role of spontaneous activity

Sensory experience: activity influences synaptic connections

Activity-dependent synaptic depression

Calcium and NMDA receptors

Mechanisms of synaptic plasticity

juan-carlosandaluz
Typewritten Text
juan-carlosandaluz
Typewritten Text
What happens if you don't eliminate synapses?
juan-carlosandaluz
Typewritten Text
juan-carlosandaluz
Typewritten Text
juan-carlosandaluz
Typewritten Text
juan-carlosandaluz
Typewritten Text
juan-carlosandaluz
Typewritten Text
juan-carlosandaluz
Typewritten Text
juan-carlosandaluz
Typewritten Text
juan-carlosandaluz
Typewritten Text
Page 2: Plasticity 2012

Keller-Peck et al., 2001!

P7! P8! P9!

Elimination of motor neuron contact in vivo

motor axons (green) endplate (red)

juan-carlosandaluz
Typewritten Text
Page 3: Plasticity 2012

Functional synapse elimination

juan-carlosandaluz
Typewritten Text
Page 4: Plasticity 2012

Synapse elimination in visual cortex

LeVay et al., 1978; Crair et al., 2001!

P21

P14

P8

P92

P39

P22

Page 5: Plasticity 2012

Hubel and Wiesel, 1962!

The geniculocortical pathway

Control

Page 6: Plasticity 2012

Monocular deprivation

Wiesel and Hubel, 1963!

NR

Page 7: Plasticity 2012

NR

Wiesel and Hubel, 1965!

Binocular deprivation

juan-carlosandaluz
Typewritten Text
Page 8: Plasticity 2012

Hubel and Wiesel, 1965!

Strabismus

Page 9: Plasticity 2012

Ocular Dominance

LeVay et al., 1980!

Critical periods Layer 4 Stripes

Age of Monocular Deprivation (mos)

Page 10: Plasticity 2012

Stryker and Harris, 1986!

Spontaneous activity & synapse elimination Dark rear Action potential blockade

Page 11: Plasticity 2012

Meister et al., 1991; Demas et al., 2003!

Spontaneous activity in the retina

Page 12: Plasticity 2012

Tritsch et al., 2007!

Spontaneous activity in the cochlea

isolated cochlea

Page 13: Plasticity 2012

Garaschuk et al., 2000!

Spontaneous activity in the cortex

juan-carlosandaluz
Typewritten Text
Page 14: Plasticity 2012

Adelsberger et al., 2005!

Spontaneous activity in the cortex

Page 15: Plasticity 2012

Sretavan and Shatz, 1986: Stellwagen et al., 2002!

Increase spontaneous activity in one eye

contra projection ipsi projection More active projection expands

Spontaneous activity & synapse elimination

Forskolin!

larger

contra ipsi

Control!

cAMP!

Page 16: Plasticity 2012

Stryker et al., 1978; Pasternak et al., 1985!

Influence of environment on coding properties

Page 17: Plasticity 2012

Li et al., 2006, 2008!

Influence of environment on coding properties

Page 18: Plasticity 2012

Rapid induction of direction selectivity

Li et al., 2008!

Imaging the intrinsic signal of visual cortex in response to moving bars

Visually inexperienced ferrets

stimulus direction

exposure time (hours)

responds to rightward moving bar

Page 19: Plasticity 2012

Auditory system plasticity

Page 20: Plasticity 2012

24 hours stimulation !

T1-weighted brain images!Sound Stimulation!

16 kHz (4 Hz AM)! 40 kHz (4 Hz AM)!

0.4 mmol/kg!

MnCl2 injection!

Brain imaging with Mn-enhanced MRI

Yu et al., 2007

7-Tesla horizontal magnet! 100 µm resolution!

pre-IP injection 24 h post-injection

Page 21: Plasticity 2012

Rearing: 16 + 40 KHz (75 dB SPL; AM; 20-23 hr/day)

dB SPL

kHz

Two-tone rearing protocol

16 32 64 0 0

80

40

P19

16 kHz

or

40 kHz

Stim Mn

Quiet

P18

pre-injection 24h post-injection

P9 P20

Image

7-Tesla horizontal magnet! 100 µm resolution!

Page 22: Plasticity 2012

Influence of environment on tonotopic map

Rear with!16+40 kHz tones!Control!

Yu et al., 2007

Page 23: Plasticity 2012

Rear with 7.1 kHz tone

?

Han et al., 2007

7.1 kHz Control

28

14

7.0

3.5

1.8

Cha

ract

eris

tic fr

eqen

cy (k

Hz)

Rear with 7.1 kHz tone!

Influence of environment on tonotopic map!

juan-carlosandaluz
Typewritten Text
Page 24: Plasticity 2012

Influence of environment on auditory behavior

Han et al., 2007!

Rear with 7.1 kHz tone!

100!

0!

Discrimination Performance at ∆0.1 octave!

(%)!

5.0! 5.9! 7.1! 8.4! 10! 11.9!14.1!16.8!20!Frequency (kHz)!

Control!

7.1k-reared!

*!

*!

*!80!

60!

40!

20!

Page 25: Plasticity 2012

Synaptic mechanisms of plasticity

Page 26: Plasticity 2012

Lo and Poo, 1992

Heterosynaptic depression in vitro

Synaptic depression & synapse elimination

Page 27: Plasticity 2012

Li et al., 2001

presynaptic terminal

Synaptic depression & elimination

postsynaptic ACh receptors

Page 28: Plasticity 2012

Yang et al., 2001

Synaptic depression & elimination

Page 29: Plasticity 2012

LTD correlated with elimination in hippocampus

Label pre and postsynaptic cells

pre

post

Stimulate presynaptic to induce LTD

pre

post yellow is area of colocalization

Bastrikova et al., 2008!

Page 30: Plasticity 2012

Bastrikova et al., 2008!

LTD (% of initial baseline)

Col

ocal

izat

ion

(% o

f bas

elin

e)

More LTD is correlated with less colocalization

LTD correlated with elimination in hippocampus

Page 31: Plasticity 2012

Synaptic depression depends on Ca+2

Cash et al., 1996!

Page 32: Plasticity 2012

Activator of postsynaptic CaMKII decreases retinal axon arbor

Zhou and Cline, 1996!

Control axons!

Active CaMKII!

Page 33: Plasticity 2012

NMDA receptors & excitatory synaptic plasticity

Page 34: Plasticity 2012

Three-eyed frogs have stripes in tectum

Constantine-Paton and Law, 1978!

Page 35: Plasticity 2012

Cline et al., 1987; Cline and Constantine-Paton, 1990!

Segregation of retinal axons & NMDA receptors

Page 36: Plasticity 2012

Review: Hensch, 2005!

Critical period for MD in mice

Page 37: Plasticity 2012

(a lot of) molecular mechanisms

Review: Tropea et al., 2009!

Page 38: Plasticity 2012

Review: Hensch, 2005!

Inhibitory control of critical period

Enhance GABA Function critical period ends early

Pla

stic

ity (r

espo

nse

to m

onoc

ular

dep

rivat

ion)

Age (days postnatal) 30 13

Reduce GABA Function critical period ends late

Page 39: Plasticity 2012

Only effective when cells are 33-35 days old

Inhibitory control of critical period

Page 40: Plasticity 2012

Use-dependent plasticity of inhibitory synapses

Kotak et al., 205, 2008!

P10!

Sensorineural Hearing Loss"

cochlea!removal!

Page 41: Plasticity 2012

Use-dependent plasticity of inhibitory synapses

Kotak et al., 205, 2008!

Page 42: Plasticity 2012

Use-dependent plasticity of inhibitory synapses