Planting Date Effects on Cover Crop Biomass Production ... · Fig 2. Sub-sample of 30 ft....

1
UNL does not discriminate based on race, ethnicity, color, national origin, sex, religion, disability, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, genetic information, veteran status, marital status, and/or political affiliation in its programs, activities, or employment. © 2014 The Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska. All rights reserved. UNL does not discriminate based on race, ethnicity, color, national origin, sex, religion, disability, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, genetic information, veteran status, marital status, and/or political affiliation in its programs, activities, or employment. © 2014 The Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska. All rights reserved. Planting Date Effects on Cover Crop Biomass Production Following Winter Wheat Kenneth J Roche 1 , Roger Elmore 1 , Katja Koehler-Cole 1 , Christopher Proctor 1 , and Angela Bastidas 1 Department of Agronomy & Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0816 No interaction between cover crop planting date and treatments in the fall or spring. Fall Biomass Production (Fig 3.) There was a difference in the fall biomass production by planting date. There was no difference in the fall biomass production by treatment. Spring Biomass Production (Fig. 4) There was a difference in biomass production by planting date and treatment. The difference in treatments may be accounted for because oats winter kill and do not contribute to spring biomass production in treatment three. Over-all there was increased biomass production in spring growth (1.7- 2.7 tons acre -1 ) versus the fall (0.3-1.6 tons acre -1 ). Spring biomass production may have potential use as forage. It was visually observed that winter killed oat biomass suppressed volunteer wheat versus a control (Fig 5.). Future studies could examine this effect. Future studies will also look at the remnant effect of these cover crops on the following corn yield components. There is increasing interest in using cover crops for forage. Maximizing the fall and spring biomass potential of cover crops depends on the timely planting of the cover crops after harvesting wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The objective of this study was to examine the effect of planting date on the biomass production of two commonly used cereal cover crops, rye (Secale cereale L.) and oat (Avena sativa L.) in a wheat-fallow-corn cropping system. Early results suggest an increase in biomass production with earlier planting dates. The preliminary data suggest that fall cover crop biomass production would not be a viable option for forage use, but spring forage may be an option prior to rotation to planting a cash crop. A RCB split plot design was used with three cover crop treatments over three planting dates with nine replications (Fig. 1). The trial was conducted at the South Central Agricultural Laboratory (SCAL) under rain-fed conditions located in Clay Center, Nebraska. Treatments: Trt 1 = Rye 60lbs/a, Trt 2 = 80lbs/a, Trt 3 = Rye:Oat (50:50) 75lbs/a, Trt 4 = control. Fall samples (10 ft 2 ) were collected by hand after the first hard freeze. Spring samples were collected as 30’ swath by mechanical harvester and sub-sampled (Fig 2.) . All samples were dried to a constant dry mass and sorted to species. 1.2 1.0 1.6 0.9 1.1 1.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 Rye Oats Rye:Oats tons acre -1 Fig 3. Fall 2015 Biomass Production ** ** ** ‘**’ significant at < 0.01 Comparison within species. Fig 1. RCBD split plot experimental design. Fig 2. Sub-sample of 30 ft. mechanically harvested swath Fig 5. Winter killed oats suppressing volunteer wheat in the spring. 2.4 2.0 2.7 2.0 2.0 1.7 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 Rye Rye:Oats tons acre -1 Fig 4. Spring 2016 Biomass Production ‘*’ significant at < 0.05 Comparison within species. * Daren Redfearn , Ashley Burns-Hassebrook, Gregory Dorn and the SCAL group from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Agronomy & Horticulture. Planting Dates 22 August 2015 10 September 2015 1 October 2015 plot width 11.2 ft. drill width 5.6 ft. field length 408.8 ft. field width 354 ft. Treatments 1 Rye 60 lbs acre -1 2 Oat 80 lbs acre -1 3 Rye:Oat (50:50) 75 lbs acre -1 4 Control

Transcript of Planting Date Effects on Cover Crop Biomass Production ... · Fig 2. Sub-sample of 30 ft....

Page 1: Planting Date Effects on Cover Crop Biomass Production ... · Fig 2. Sub-sample of 30 ft. mechanically harvested swath Fig 5. Winter killed oats suppressing volunteer wheat in the

UNL does not discriminate based on race, ethnicity, color, national origin, sex, religion, disability, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, genetic information, veteran status, marital status, and/or political affiliation in its programs, activities, or employment.

© 2014 The Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska. All rights reserved.

UNL does not discriminate based on race, ethnicity, color, national origin, sex, religion, disability, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, genetic information, veteran status, marital status, and/or political affiliation in its programs, activities, or employment.

© 2014 The Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska. All rights reserved.

Planting Date Effects on Cover Crop Biomass Production Following Winter Wheat

Kenneth J Roche1, Roger Elmore1, Katja Koehler-Cole1, Christopher Proctor1, and Angela Bastidas1

Department of Agronomy & Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0816

No interaction between cover crop planting date

and treatments in the fall or spring.

Fall Biomass Production (Fig 3.)

• There was a difference in the fall biomass

production by planting date.

• There was no difference in the fall biomass

production by treatment.

Spring Biomass Production (Fig. 4) • There was a difference in biomass production by

planting date and treatment.

• The difference in treatments may be accounted for

because oats winter kill and do not contribute to

spring biomass production in treatment three.

• Over-all there was increased biomass production

in spring growth (1.7- 2.7 tons acre-1) versus the

fall (0.3-1.6 tons acre-1).

• Spring biomass production may have potential use

as forage.

• It was visually observed that winter killed oat

biomass suppressed volunteer wheat versus a

control (Fig 5.). Future studies could examine this

effect.

• Future studies will also look at the remnant effect

of these cover crops on the following corn yield

components.

• There is increasing interest in using cover crops

for forage. Maximizing the fall and spring

biomass potential of cover crops depends on the

timely planting of the cover crops after

harvesting wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

• The objective of this study was to examine the

effect of planting date on the biomass

production of two commonly used cereal cover

crops, rye (Secale cereale L.) and oat (Avena

sativa L.) in a wheat-fallow-corn cropping

system.

• Early results suggest an increase in biomass

production with earlier planting dates. The

preliminary data suggest that fall cover crop

biomass production would not be a viable option

for forage use, but spring forage may be an

option prior to rotation to planting a cash crop.

• A RCB split plot design was used with three

cover crop treatments over three planting dates

with nine replications (Fig. 1).

• The trial was conducted at the South Central

Agricultural Laboratory (SCAL) under rain-fed

conditions located in Clay Center, Nebraska.

• Treatments: Trt 1 = Rye 60lbs/a, Trt 2 = 80lbs/a,

Trt 3 = Rye:Oat (50:50) 75lbs/a, Trt 4 =

control.

• Fall samples (10 ft2) were collected by hand

after the first hard freeze.

• Spring samples were collected as 30’ swath by

mechanical harvester and sub-sampled (Fig 2.) .

• All samples were dried to a constant dry mass

and sorted to species.

1.2 1.0

1.6

0.9 1.1

1.4

0.4 0.3 0.4

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

Rye Oats Rye:Oats

ton

s acr

e-1

Fig 3. Fall 2015 Biomass Production

** ** **

‘**’ significant at < 0.01 Comparison within species.

Fig 1. RCBD split plot experimental design.

Fig 2. Sub-sample of 30 ft. mechanically

harvested swath

Fig 5. Winter killed oats suppressing

volunteer wheat in the spring.

2.4

2.0

2.7

2.0 2.0

1.7

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

Rye Rye:Oats

ton

s acr

e-1

Fig 4. Spring 2016 Biomass Production

‘*’ significant at < 0.05 Comparison within species.

*

Daren Redfearn , Ashley Burns-Hassebrook, Gregory Dorn and the

SCAL group from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department

of Agronomy & Horticulture.

Planting Dates

22 August 2015

10 September 2015

1 October 2015

plot width 11.2 ft.

drill width 5.6 ft.

field length 408.8 ft.

field width 354 ft.

Treatments

1 Rye 60 lbs acre-1

2 Oat 80 lbs acre-1

3 Rye:Oat (50:50) 75 lbs acre-1

4 Control