Plane Press June2014

download Plane Press June2014

of 5

Transcript of Plane Press June2014

  • 8/10/2019 Plane Press June2014

    1/5

    June 2014 We Fix it Right the First Time

    How are we doing?

    Yeartodatethrough6/20:

    Cancellation% 0.34

    Delays>120min% 0.39

    D&C% 4.84

    STAR% 3.87

    OTS@0700CT 22.8

    OTS Inventory(Parts) 5.8

    MELAD+CDL275 242

    FocusItems 31

    Chronics 230

    WorkAccomplishment % 96.33

    A/CDamage 2.17

    Also in this issue

    MessagefromKen 2

    Understandingthescorecard 2

    SCEPTREupdate 3

    NewIAHtoolingfacility 4

    FirstQuarter

    United

    100

    5

    LHRs Tech Ops teams

    come together at new T2

    AircraftMaintenanceEWRandRegionalManagingDirectorBobRuzich,fifthfromleft,visitedournewlyintegrated

    LHRTechOpsstationonopeningdayforthenewQueensTerminal,June4.Below,ourfirstarrivalatthenew

    terminalwasaB767,Flight958fromORD.

    Withall17dailyUniteddeparturesatLHRnowoperatingfromTerminal2,

    whichopenedJune4,wefinallyhaveasingle,integratedTechnicalOperations

    stationatourlargestEuropeanlocation.

    Combiningouroperationsenabled

    usto

    expand

    the

    technician

    workforcefrom25to37and

    repatriateworkthatwashandledby

    avendorwhentheEWRandIAH

    flightsoperatedfromTerminal4.

    WealsorelocatedourAOGmaterialswarehousefromLGW(LondonGatwick)toLHR,socan

    betterrespondtotheneedsofEuropeanstationsthatLHRTechOpssupports.SeeFlying

    TogetherforcoverageoftheofficialgrandopeningonJune23,andwatchformoreintheJuly

    issueofPlanePress.

    Whatisthis?

    SeeUnderstandingthe

    TechOpsDaily

    Scorecard,page2

    TechnicalOperationsDailyScorecard 6/20/2014 Planorbetterthan plan

    Daily

    Actual

    Rate/Count

    MTD

    Actual

    Rate

    Monthly

    2014

    Goal

    Rate

    YTD

    Actual

    Rate

    2014Goal

    Rate

    Thresholdwithin5%ofplan

    Worsethanplan by5%ormore

    Cancellation% 0.50% 0.54% 0.45% 0.34% 0.36%

    Delays>120min% 0.35% 0.42% 0.45% 0.39% 0.38%

    D&C% 4.88% 5.38% 5.10% 4.84% 4.75%

    STAR% 3.47% 3.80% 4.09% 3.87% 3.72%

    OutofService(OOS)@0700CT 22 22.5 19.5 22.8 19.0

    OTS Inventory(Parts) 5 5.4 5.50 5.8 5.25

    MELACOnly 300 279 260 242 235

    FocusItems 33 33 34 31 28

    Chronics 287 253 275 230 240

    WorkAccomplishment% 97.32% 96.93% 94.79% 96.33% 95.19%

    ACDamageper10,000RON's* 4/18YTDDamages

    Pending/Charged0 0.00 2.15 2.17 2.15

    QACompliance (Pastdue CARs) MetricUnderreview

  • 8/10/2019 Plane Press June2014

    2/5

    Plane Press June 2014 2

    Understanding the daily scorecard

    Every day, we issue the Tech Ops Daily Scorecard, which shows at a glance how we are

    performing in 11 key areas that roll up to Uniteds overall operational performance. Coming

    soon, you can access this from the Tech Ops home page of Flying Together.

    Below are the metrics we track and which all of us in Tech Ops have a role in improving.

    Consult Oracle Business Intelligence to learn how your team contributes to the division

    performance. Contact [email protected] get access to OBI.

    Cancellation %:The percentage of mainline cancellations attributed to Tech Ops.

    Delays > 120 min %:Long delays attributed to Tech Ops. As many of these long delays

    affect international flights, and Tech Ops is the biggest contributor to this metric, reducing

    these delays is a top priority.

    D&C %:All delays and cancels attributed to Tech Ops. Since the vast majority of these

    delays are of very short duration and have minimal impact, the goal is set much higher than

    for long delays.

    STAR %:Delays and cancellations on flights leaving before 0930 local time. When we can

    Start the Airline Right, the rest of the day goes more smoothly as early delays and cancels

    tend to have disruptive ripple effects throughout the system.

    Out o f Servi ce (OOS) @ 0700CT:We have about 700 mainline aircraft; our operation can

    generally handle a certain number being out of service each morning. Once we go above

    the goal, which for this month is set at 19.5, disruptions are inevitable.

    OTS - Inventory (Parts):Of the OTS count, planes that would otherwise be back in service

    but for lack of parts. This is a paramount metric for our Supply Chain organization.

    MEL A-C Only :We can defer the repair of many Minimum Equipment List items for varying

    periods of time, and this number represents the total for the system at the start of each day.

    We clear most of our MELs quickly while new ones are added, so while this number may

    appear stable the items are being turned over constantly and quickly. Most items are

    deferred just long enough to get the plane to a place it can be repaired.

    Focus Items:We have assigned focus item priority to those pending repairs that can

    impact crew workload, customer comfort, or dispatch restrictions.

    Chronics:When we fix it right the first time we generate fewer chronics, although some

    require complex troubleshooting.

    Work Accomplishment %:How much of the work that was supposed to occur was

    completed. This percentage takes into account work that was not completed on planes at

    stations as well as that which could not be started on schedule due to routing disruptions.

    AC Damage per 10,000 RON's: Most of the aircraft damages attributed to Tech Ops

    involve slide deployments.

    (The QA Compliance metric is under review, we will report on it at a later date.)

    Your input, feedback

    helps achieve goals

    This months Plane Press

    features a story on our Tech

    Ops Daily Scorecard. We

    use this scorecard to provide

    high visibility for key

    performance metrics that

    reflect our operational

    reliability. These metrics are

    not goals unto themselves,

    but they support our goal of

    having an industry-leading

    product that we are proud to

    sell.

    The top three metrics on the

    scorecard reflect delay and

    cancellation rates. These are

    called output indicators

    because they reflect the

    output of all the processes

    that we have in place to

    deliver a reliable product.

    The remaining metrics on

    the scorecard are called

    process indicators because

    these reflect our

    performance in keyprocesses that contribute to

    good reliability. For example,

    managing a low MEL count

    is very important for good

    reliability. While MELs allow

    us to defer repairs to

    redundant systems in order

    to avoid delays and

    cancellations, losing a level

    of redundancy puts us at risk

    for subsequent delays and

    cancellations if another fault

    to the affected system

    occurs. If this happens at anoutstation, the operational

    impact could be significant.

    The Tech Ops Daily

    Scorecard is an example of

    the many tools we use in our

    FAA-required Continuous

    Analysis and Surveillance

    System (CASS).

    (continued next page)

    TechnicalOperationsDailyScorecard 6/20/2014

    PlanorbetterthanplanDaily

    Actual

    Rate/Count

    MTD

    Actual

    Rate

    Monthly

    2014

    Goal

    Rate

    YTD

    Actual

    Rate

    2014Goal

    Rate

    Thresholdwithin5%ofplan

    Worsethanplanby5%ormore

    Cancellation% 0.50% 0.54% 0.45% 0.34% 0.36%

    Delays>120min% 0.35% 0.42% 0.45% 0.39% 0.38%

    D&C% 4.88% 5.38% 5.10% 4.84% 4.75%

    STAR% 3.47% 3.80% 4.09% 3.87% 3.72%

    OutofService(OOS)@0700CT 22 22.5 19.5 22.8 19.0

    OTS Inventory(Parts) 5 5.4 5.50 5.8 5.25

    MELACOnly 300 279 260 242 235

    FocusItems 33 33 34 31 28

    Chronics 287 253 275 230 240

    WorkAccomplishment% 97.32% 96.93% 94.79% 96.33% 95.19%

    ACDamageper10,000RON's* 4/18YTD

    Damages

    Pending/Charged0 0.00 2.15 2.17 2.15

    QACompliance(PastdueCARs)MetricUnderreview

  • 8/10/2019 Plane Press June2014

    3/5

    Plane Press June 2014

    Tech Ops, IT working with other

    groups on post-migration opsBefore the plane-by-plane migration of our aircraft onto SCEPTRE begins early next year,

    the Tech Ops and IT teams managing the process need to know exactly how it will affect

    other groups who rely on accurate data to make crucial operational decisions every shift,

    every day. To ensure a smooth process, the integration team recently brought together

    representatives from Maintenance, Dispatch, Routing, Flight Ops and Crew Scheduling to

    discuss their needs and current uses of aircraft and maintenance information and to

    determine what, if any, changes will occur as part of the migration.

    Were taking proactive steps now to mitigate any issues, and our goal is simple no

    operational impact. No delays or cancellations, said Operations Automation Managing

    Director Julian Pachon.

    The Tech Ops Day One planned for early 2015 will mark the consolidation of all materials

    data and associated processes to SCEPTRE. It will be followed by the phased aircraft-by-

    aircraft migration of AMIS-based fleets to SCEPTRE. Prior to cutover we will have

    completed development and received FAA approval of our Electronic Log Book (ELB)

    functionality in SCEPTRE and will begin transitioning SCEPTRE aircraft using a paper

    aircraft logbook to the new ELB. Getting us to Day One has already involved hundreds of

    employees and business partners and we have conducted two dress rehearsals and will

    hold at least two more, said Maintenance Strategic Planning Managing Director Mark Miner.

    IT Business Architecture Director Diane LeBeau helped set expectations for the

    departments involved, updating them on the software development and soliciting input on

    future requirements. We need to make sure that if anything is likely to change we know

    about it now, she said.

    Attendees at the daylong meeting in late May worked with the integration leadership team

    and support staff to identify each transaction involved in routing and dispatching aircraft.

    The workshop was very productive, said Network Operations Center System Director

    Noam Alon. Our team walked away with increased confidence about the success of the

    migration.

    For ongoing updates, check the SCEPTREsection of Flying Together. Go to Flying

    Together > Tech Ops > SCEPTRE using the left-side navigation menu. You can also send

    questions or comments about the migration to [email protected].

    Message from Ken

    (from previous page)

    Our CASS continually

    monitors and evaluates the

    performance and

    effectiveness of our

    maintenance program and

    processes to ensure that we

    are complying with all

    requirements and to ensure

    that we are achieving

    intended results. Our

    primary obligation is, of

    course, to ensure aircraft

    airworthiness which, by FAA

    definition, includes safety as

    well as conformity to design

    regulatory requirements.

    Another intended result of

    our maintenance program is

    to achieve the level of

    reliability that is inherent in

    the design of the aircraft and

    equipment. Metrics provide

    quantitative performance

    indicators for reliability, but

    qualitative analysis is

    required to assess

    significance and to

    determine the root causes of

    any performance declines.

    This can identify deficiencies

    in our maintenance

    programs and processes, or

    it can identify deficiencies in

    aircraft design which we can

    then address through

    modifications. We also have

    to follow-up and close the

    loop with further analysis

    and surveillance to ensure

    that corrective actions are

    effective.

    Metrics are important

    performance indicators, but

    the most valuable

    information comes from your

    input based on your first-

    hand experience supporting

    our operation. Reporting

    safety hazards is vitallyimportant, and we also need

    all the feedback we can get

    on anything that can help us

    better achieve our goals

    related to quality, delivery,

    and cost. Were very grateful

    for your vigilance and

    dedication.

    Ken

  • 8/10/2019 Plane Press June2014

    4/5

    Plane Press June 2014 4

    New IAH tooling facility outfits us to better

    serve growing 787 fleet, other widebodiesTechnicians at IAH are now able to check out tooling and

    kits for working on 787s and other widebodies from our

    new, state-of-the-art facility that is located adjacent to our

    widebody hangar and provides a more secure and

    controlled environment for the valuable items.

    Were already hearing a lot of positive input from the

    techs, and, for us, it is a huge improvement in every way,

    said Lead Utility Specialist Vic Ruiz (at left in photo). He

    pointed out that all our widebody tooling is now located in

    one place central to the work and the workers, and we

    are shaving minutes off nearly every tooling transaction.

    The 5,000-square-foot facility has capacity for all our

    current widebody tooling and can handle expansion as

    our 787 fleet grows and as we take delivery starting in 2018 of the Airbus A350-XWB. In addition to aircraft tools, test equipment,

    and kits made up of tools and/or parts for specific maintenance jobs, it houses general-use tools and supplies ranging from

    personal protective equipment to cleaning materials and solutions.

    To accommodate those hundreds of tools and kits in a toolroom with a relatively modest footprint, we installed a three-section

    vertical lift storage system similar to those used in the warehouses of giant retailers like Amazon. IAH Aircraft Maintenance

    Supervisor Mark Green believes it to be the only one in use by a major airline or aircraft maintenance provider.

    We can keep everything but the largest and heaviest kits in these units, and now it is easier than ever to keep track of them and

    retrieve them when technicians need them, Mark said.

    Mark credits Vic and Utility Specialist Billy Deguzman (at right with Vic in photo at top of page) with putting in countless hours and

    days over several months to get the tool room in shape and working with its customers technicians who work on the 787s, 767s

    and 777s in the adjacent hangar and ramp area. Mark said they succeeded in engineering the space and its contents to meet our

    immediate needs and to enable improvements based on changing operational requirements and ongoing technician input.

    At our new widebody tool ing fac il ity in IAH, tool ing is much

    easier to protect from t he elements and to keep track of, and

    the sophisticated retrieval system makes it nearly impossible

    to issue or return t he wrong too l or kit. There is a place for

    everything, and everthings in i ts place or clearly checked out

    and in use. Above left, Vic places an order; center, a closeup

    of the interface; at right, a laser dot highlights the location of

    the item. Left: Each items p roper location is marked in a

    custom cutout.

  • 8/10/2019 Plane Press June2014

    5/5

    Plane Press June 2014 5

    Congratulations to our 1Q United 100 honorees

    Victor Biro Donny Borja Juan Fernandez Amjad Hussain Mariya Ivleva Scott Johnston

    Ted Moore Walter Morgan Joel Ortiz Freddy Robaina Jose Rodriguez Hemant Singh

    We salute our latest group of United 100 winners. For the First Quarter, these 12 employees were selected for the honor from

    among dozens who were nominated by their peers in Tech Ops for their above and beyond contributions to our airline. Here are

    the names and jobs of all the winners, plus the name of the employee(s) who nominated them, and an excerpt from their

    nominations. To see all the 100 winners this quarter, and to submit your nominations, go to Flying Together > Employee Services

    > Rewards & Recognition> United 100.

    Victor Biro, Powerplant Technician-Base, SFOPD, nominated by Kamkar Masood, SFOPD. Vic is a leader in the engine shop. He is

    well respected by his fellow co-workers, management and engineering for his enthusiasm and commitment to excellence.

    Donny Borja, Facility Maintenance Operations Supervisor, GUMGQ, nominated by Kikuo Soledad, GUMCS. For his support to the

    GUM United Club and its customers: Thank you Donny for your quick response in a timely manner to help in time of need.

    Juan Fernandez, GSE Technician-Line, IAHGX, nominated by Michael Furlinger, IAHAO. In assisting a customer who was having

    trouble with a motorized wheelchair, Juan went above and beyond He not only solved the needs of a disabled veteran but savedUnited several hundred dollars in repairs and travel cost.

    Amjad Hussain,Storekeeper, IAHJJ, nominated by Dev Nandlal, IAHJJ. When trying to expedite AOG parts to a plane that was

    stranded in GRU, We were very lucky Amjad was on duty the departing flight in GRU left without delay, saving [United] a lot of

    money!

    Mariya Ivleva, Project Engineer, WHQEG, nominated by Nicholas McAlister, WHQEG. Mariya has been tirelessly working to make

    the United reliability a reality real for the 787.

    Scott Johnston, Engine/APU Technical Planner, CSGPL, nominated by David Doucey, WHQVM. His motto is to never allow an

    engine to have production delays due to parts within his control. In all of 2013, he was involved in the production of nearly 80 engines

    - none of which were delayed due to parts.

    Ted Moore,Technician-Line, IAHMM, nominiated by Capt. Antone Sacker, IAHFO. Working a charter flight to Alaska, Mr. Moore

    tried to head off any problems that he anticipated, and met the requests of any maintenance issues the crew may have noticed.

    Walter Morgan,Lead Line Technician, DENMM, nominated by Debra Franks, DENOO. Walter found and helped return things a

    customer left on board. By taking a few extra minutes out of his day and going out of his way for this [customer], Walter extendedexcellent customer service that this passenger won't soon forget!

    Joel Ortiz,Avionics Technician-Base, SFOOV, nominated by Tim Vo, WHQEG. For ongoing work on systems including IFE and WiFi

    systems, Joel is a incredible technician and is the go-to guy when it comes to avionics maintenance.

    Freddy Robaina,Supervisor-Aircraft Maintenance, MIAMM, nominated by David Lucas, EWRSK. A passenger on a flght when IFE

    failed, Freddy then worked endlessly during the next two hours troubleshooting the system in his attempts to get the IFE functional.

    Jose Rodriguez,Technician-Line, BOSMM, nominated by David Peuser, BOSMX. Jose prevented a vechile from striking a parked

    plane on an icy ramp: Quick action on Jose's part saved United thousands of dollars for repair and disrupting many customers for

    their flight the following morning.

    Hemant Singh, Lead Storekeeper, SFOJD, nominated by Marian Flores, SFOJD. He is safety conscious, finds ways to save ourcompany money, he focuses on customer needs and demands and is the epitome of safety.