Placon Corp. v. Sabert Corp. - Complaint
date post
03-Jun-2018Category
Documents
view
223download
0
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of Placon Corp. v. Sabert Corp. - Complaint
8/11/2019 Placon Corp. v. Sabert Corp. - Complaint
1/60
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICTFOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
PLACON CORPORATION6096 McKee Road
Madison, WI 53719,
Plaintiff,
v.
SABERT CORPORATION2288 Main Street ExtensionSayreville, NJ 08872,
Defendant.
))
)))))))))))))
)
Civil Action No. 14-cv-587
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT AND
INVALIDITY
Plaintiff Placon Corporation (Placon), for its Complaint against Defendant Sabert
Corporation (Sabert) alleges as follows:
THE PARTIES
1. Placon is a Wisconsin corporation with a principal place of business at 6096 McKee
Road, Fitchburg, Wisconsin, 53719.
2. Upon information and belief, Sabert is a New Jersey corporation with a principal place of
business at 2288 Main Street Extension, Sayreville, New Jersey, 08872.
BACKGROUND
3. This is an action for a declaratory judgment of noninfringement and invalidity of U.S.
States Patent No. D527,956 (the 956 patent), which is attached as Exhibit A to this Complaint.
This action therefore arises under 35 U.S.C. 1 et seq.and 28 U.S.C. 2201et seq.
Case: 3:14-cv-00587 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/22/14 Page 1 of 5
8/11/2019 Placon Corp. v. Sabert Corp. - Complaint
2/60
2
4. Placon is a nationwide leader in the design and manufacture of thermoformed plastic
packaging for the food, retail, and medical device industries. Placon designs, produces and sells a
variety of food packaging materials for bakeries, catering companies, convenience stores, the
food processing industry, supermarkets, and the food service industry.
5. Placon manufactures, sells, and offers for sale its Fresh n Clear brand of bowls and
lids for storing food products for display and use in supermarkets, delis, quick marts, restaurants,
cafeterias, and similar venues. Included among this line of products is a12 ounce bowl, SBS-12,
and a lid, SDLS-2. A copy of a brochure depicting the SBS-12 and the SDLS-2 is attached as
Exhibit B.
6. Sabert purports to own the 956 patent. On or about August 15, 2014, Sabert, through its
counsel, sent Placon a letter alleging that Placon was infringing the 956 patent by
manufacturing, using, selling, offering for sale and/or importing a food container that matches
the description of Placons SBS-12 bowl used with a SDLS-2 lid (the Placon Product).The
letter and attached exhibits received from Saberts counsel is attached as Exhibit C.
7. In the letter from Sabert, Sabert demanded that Placon cease and desist with respect to all
sales activities of the Placon Product, provide the names and addresses of customers to which
Placon had sold the Placon Product, the numbers of units sold, information about inventories of
the Placon Product, and information about molds and tools used to manufacture the Placon
Product. Sabert also attached a purported complaint for patent infringement and threatened to sue
Placon if Placon did not accede to its demands by August 25, 2014.
8. Placon has a reasonable apprehension that Sabert will disrupt Placons business by filing
suit against Placon for alleged infringement of the 956 patent and attempting to enjoin Placons
activities and/or claim it is entitled to monetary damages.
Case: 3:14-cv-00587 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/22/14 Page 2 of 5
8/11/2019 Placon Corp. v. Sabert Corp. - Complaint
3/60
3
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
9. Placon incorporates all previous allegations by reference. Based on the foregoing, a
present, genuine, actual and justiciable controversy exists under 28 U.S.C. 2201 and 2202 and
the patent laws, 35 U.S.C. 1 et seq.,between Placon and Sabert regarding, among other things,
Placons alleged infringement of the 956 patent and the validity of the 956 patent.
10.This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1338,
2201.
11.Upon information and belief, Sabert regularly conducts business throughout the United
States and sells products within this judicial district and within this state. Sabert has contracts
and/or key sales or distribution relationships throughout the state of Wisconsin, including with
DJ Payne, Advance Sales, Joshen Milwaukee, Sysco, Culvers, Reinhart Foods, Roundys, Kwik
Trip, US Foods, and the University of Wisconsin. Upon further information and belief, Saberts
sales within the state of Wisconsin amount to at least $10 million annually. Saberts business
activities in Wisconsin are so continuous and systematic as to essentially render it at home in
Wisconsin. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Sabert pursuant to Wis. Stat. 801.05.
12.Venue in this case is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)-(c) and 1400(b).
COUNT I DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT
13.Placon incorporates all previous allegations by reference.
14.The Placon Product, and any product similar to the Placon Product that is used,
manufactured, sold, offered for sale, and/or imported by Placon does not and will not infringe
the 956 patent.
15.Accordingly, Placon is entitled to a declaratory judgment of noninfringement.
Case: 3:14-cv-00587 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/22/14 Page 3 of 5
8/11/2019 Placon Corp. v. Sabert Corp. - Complaint
4/60
4
COUNT II DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
16.Placon incorporates all previous allegations by reference.
17.The 956 patent is invalid under one or more of 35 U.S.C. 102, 103 and/or 112 in view
of at least United States Patent No. D450,983, Saberts Freshpack all set to go Brochure dated
1997, and /or a bowl and lid product manufactured and sold by Placon to Leeann Chin Inc., a
design of which is attached as Exhibit D, prior to the priority date of the 956 patent.
18.Accordingly, Placon is entitled to a declaratory judgment on invalidity.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Wherefore, Placon requests that judgment be entered in its favor and against Sabert as
follows:
A. Declaring that Placon has not, and will not, infringe the 956 patent;
B. Declaring that the 956 patent is invalid;
C. Declaring that Placon is entitled to its fees and costs in this action pursuant to 35
U.S.C. 285 and any other applicable statute, and awarding such fees and costs; and
D. Awarding such other relief as deemed appropriate.
JURY DEMAND
Placon demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
Case: 3:14-cv-00587 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/22/14 Page 4 of 5
8/11/2019 Placon Corp. v. Sabert Corp. - Complaint
5/60
5
Dated: August 22, 2014 MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.
/s/ Edward J. Pardon
Jeffrey S. Ward
jward@merchantgould.comEdward J. Pardonepardon@merchantgould.com10 East Doty Street, Suite 600Madison, WI 53703(T) 608-280-6750(F) 612-332-9081
Case: 3:14-cv-00587 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/22/14 Page 5 of 5
8/11/2019 Placon Corp. v. Sabert Corp. - Complaint
6/60
EXHIBIT A
Case: 3:14-cv-00587 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/22/14 Page 1 of 15
8/11/2019 Placon Corp. v. Sabert Corp. - Complaint
7/60
111111
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
USOOD527956S
(12) United States Design Patent (10)
Patent No.: US D527 956 S
Sep. 12 2006
oliwa
(45)
Date of Patent:
(54)
COMBINED SQUARE BOWL AND LID
(75) Inventor: Wojciech Doliwa Sayreville, NJ (US)
(73) Assignee: Sabert Corporation Sayreville, NJ
(US)
(**) Tenn: 14 Years
(21) Appl. No.: 291243 360
(22) Filed: Nov. 23 2005
Related U.S. Application Data
(62) Division
of
application No.
291205,921,
filed on May 21,
2004, now abandoned.
(51) LOC (8) Cl.
....................................................
07-01
(52) U.S. Cl.
..........................................
D7/629; D9/432
(58)
Field
of
Classification Search
..................
D7/601,
D7/602,
629, 538-542; D9/424-432;
220/360,
220/366, 574, 780-806, 912, 913;
229/406,
229/407, 902-906
See application file for complete search history.
(56)
References Cited
U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
4,412,630 A * 1111983 Daenen ......................
2201792
D355,814 S * 211995 VanValkenburg et
aI .....
D7/629
5,992,679 A * 1111999 Porchia et al. ...... ...... ..
2201782
D439,159 S *
3/2001
Chen ...........................
D9/425
D441,615 S
* 5/2001
Dretzka .......................
D7/629
D450,983 S *
11/2001
Tucker et al. ................
D7/629
D475,620 S
* 6/2003
Chen et al. .. ..... ..... ..... .
D9/425
D490,278 S
* 5/2004
Welsh .........................
D7/629
* cited by examiner
Primary Examiner-Terry
A. Wallace
(74) Attorney, Agent,
or Firm-Erza
Sutton, Esq.
(57)
CLAIM
The ornamental designs for a combined square bowl and lid,
as shown and described.
DESCRIPTION
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view
of
a combined square bowl
and lid embodying a first embodiment of my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left side view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a right side view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a front perspective view
of