PlaceEXPO Building for Education: Kerrie Norman, Flinders Chase
-
Upload
place-north-west -
Category
Education
-
view
229 -
download
2
description
Transcript of PlaceEXPO Building for Education: Kerrie Norman, Flinders Chase
Education Capital Funding & University
Technical Colleges
Kerrie Norman PD and Client for 37 Schools, Academies, UTCs & Free Schools in 18
different Local Authorities Programme Director for over 200 Academies, £1.7bn Primary Capital
Programme and Phase 1 UTC programme Design & Procurement Lead for the Education Capital Review Private Sector Local Authority Central Govt Private Sector
Navigate through the Capital Funding System How we can use the system to generate
maximum value for all Closer look at one form of new provision University Technical Colleges
Introduction
£21 billion Education Capital Funding in the Last CSR Period (to 2010-2011)
£7 billion in 2010
Around £5bn - £6bn in the current financial year
Education Capital Funding
Strategic Devolved Targeted
Building Schools for the Future
Basic Need Targeted Capital Fund (pre-BSF)
Primary Capital Programme
Maintenance/ Modernisation
Minister Priorities (i.e. kitchens, musical instruments, diplomas, playbuilder, etc.)
LCVAP
Devolved Formula Capital (DFC)
2010 Capital Funding Streams
Capital Review Headlines
67,000,000m2 of Education Buildings (not FE or HE)
£50 billion to £100 billion in backlog maintenance
At least 229 different Frameworks & Delivery vehicles
£10k to £50k per pupil for new primary places
How it Might Have LookedSingle capital funding regime based on evidence of condition and demographic data
Local Panel
Condition
Demographics
Funding Algorithm Central Gov
(Education Providers)
Local PlanIndividual Education Providers
New Provision
Major Maintenance
Refurb & Redevelopment
Feasibility Studies
Continuous Information
Reality
Devolved Targeted
Basic Need Free Schools
Maintenance University Technical Colleges
LCVAP Studio Schools
Devolved Formula Capital (80% reduction)
Academies Capital Maintenance Fund
Local Authorities retain a Statutory Duty to provide pupil places
Only new Academies can be established
Reality
Fragmented system of provision and capital funding
Unclear delivery pipeline and private sector drain
Patchy value for money
Lack of Client Capacity & Insularity
Opportunities
Local Areas Local Panels
Area Strategies (Provision & Estates)
Match Demand/Projections Provision
Lever Additional Targeted Funding and Investment
Engage Appropriate Specialists
University Technical Colleges
New 14 to 19 Academies
1 University & Employers
At least 1 Technical Specialism
08:30 to 17:00 and Extended Academic Year
Approximately 16 open and 34 in pre-opening
UTC Opportunities
Huge Potential as a Concept
Clear pathways to HE and Employment
Academic Quals + Relevant Technical Skills
Student Recruitment for Higher Education
Skilled Local Talent for Employers
UTCs – Current Picture Early picture is mixed
3 have received full Ofsted Inspections 2 Require Improvement 1 Special Measures
Most have under-recruited
2013 Openers are stronger
Several Studio Schools Closing
UTCs and New Provision
It is a NEW Business with No Track Record
Advantages to Students must be Clear
Sponsor & Partner Group Cohesion
Suitability of Staff Appointments
Vested Interests
Common Success Factors Need and Demand is Clear
The University Sponsor is ALL IN
Student Experience, Pathways & Progression
Local Authority is supportive & involved
GCSEs/A Levels + Foundation Degrees/HNCs + Technical Qualifications
What about the Buildings? Challenging budgets, programmes & processes
£1,094/m2 (Build) and 22 to 26 weeks procurement
Optimum procurement routes (competition & fixed rates)
Agree realistic sites pre-application
High quality & experienced Advisors
The Future Significant funding available
System will remain fragmented
Maintain high ambition
Opportunities to self-organise and upscale plans
Resistance to insularity Advisors, procurement models, designs
Thank You