Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

44
Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top Q1 2012 vs 2011

description

Quaterly Promo Review: the global summary of data agregation of promo leaflets KPI for Polish Market Q1 12 vs 11

Transcript of Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

Page 1: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 2: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

RETAILERS

QUANTITATIV KPI Slides

1- LEAFLETS & OPERATIONS1- LEAFLETS & OPERATIONS 4-84-8

33-3333-33

4- PROMO MECHANISMES4- PROMO MECHANISMES 3-73-7

3- PROMO PRESSUR & SHARE OF VOICE3- PROMO PRESSUR & SHARE OF VOICE

15-2515-25

2- TRADE STRATEGY2- TRADE STRATEGY 9-139-13

QUALITY KPI 3-73-7

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

Page 3: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

PROMO OPERATION*PROMO OPERATION*

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

•Promo Pressure: index of promo visibility for a retailer, a category a brand or a format•Share of Voice: index of promo visibility for a retailer, a category a brand or a format in relative value versus competitors. The Share of Voice index of Hipercom shows the promo activity of the Retailers in the most exhaustive way, taking into consideration the quantity of promotional operations, SKU’s or WU in Promo, the commercial space (in m2) when the promotion was valid and the number of days of the validity days of that specific promotion.•Weighted Unit ( WU): One or more SKU from the same family, being on the same promotion (many flavors for juice, many colors for shampoo, many sizes for textile)•Consumer advantages: All additional trade mechanisms supporting the promo price and mentioned on the promo leaflet.•Promo price: Price on the leaflet (should be different from the shelf price) •Virtual Price: Promo price – (minus) all consumers advantages •ND: National distribution For one retailer = number of stores participating in a promotion/ Total number of that retailer’s stores. •Negative Promo: (Index)= Qty of promo cheaper somewhere else ( at the same date) / total qty of promo (for the concerned retailer) •Perimeter of analysis: Romania: CC, Hyper, Super, HDD (Analysis for the Top 20 Retailers of this category)

Page 4: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

Q1 2012 vs 2011

1- LEAFLETS & OPERATIONS

1- LEAFLETS & OPERATIONS

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

Page 5: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

PROMO OPERATION*PROMO OPERATION*

Q1 2012 vs 2011

The quantity of Promo Operations is growing in 2012, with a trend to regional editions

* A Promo Operation is a set of leaflets by a store network. This set could consist of one leaflet till 15 or more regional variations.

Page 6: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

PROMO OPERATION*PROMO OPERATION*

Q1 2012 vs 2011

* A Promo Operation is a set of leaflets by a store network. This set could consist of one leaflet till 15 or more regional variations.

Page 7: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

5 TOP TRAFFIC LEAFLET (by Promo Pressure) 5 TOP TRAFFIC LEAFLET (by Promo Pressure)

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 8: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

AVARAGE NUMBER OF PAGES / PROMO OP AVARAGE NUMBER OF PAGES / PROMO OP

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Wzrost w ilości wydawanych gazetek zarówno lokalnych jak i ogólnonarodowych

Page 9: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Promo Flash of food retailers in 20’top

2 - TRADE STRATEGY2 - TRADE STRATEGY

Page 10: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

WU* TYPOLOGY (Brands, Private Labels, Unbranded)WU* TYPOLOGY (Brands, Private Labels, Unbranded)

Share of Brands

* WU = one or more SKU from the same family, visible on one picture (e.g. various flavours)

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 11: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

QUANTITY OF SKU BY OPQUANTITY OF SKU BY OP

* WU = one or more SKU from the same family, visible on one picture (e.g. various flavours)

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 12: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

WU TYPOLOGY (Brands, Private Labels, Unbranded )WU TYPOLOGY (Brands, Private Labels, Unbranded )

* WU = one or more SKU from the same family, visible on one picture (e.g. various flavours)

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 13: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

AVERAGE PRICE (virtual)AVERAGE PRICE (virtual)

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 14: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

Promo Flash of food retailers in 20’top

3 – PROMO PRESSURE & SHARE OF VOICES

3 – PROMO PRESSURE & SHARE OF VOICES

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 15: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

PROMO PRESSURE Growth*PROMO PRESSURE Growth*

+13%

The promo pressure of every retailer:Cash & Carry : -20%Convenience : 41Discounts : 45%Hipermarkets : 19%Supermarkets : 28%

Growth v/s Y-1

* The Promo Pressure growth is calculated in WU promoted x comercial space in m2. A growth <0 means a mix of less WU promoted and/ or less commerical m2.

•The Promo Pressure Growth is possitive v/s Y-1.This situation is the result of a greater number of Promo Operations and more pages per Promo Operation.

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 16: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

PROMO PRESSURE*PROMO PRESSURE*

* The Promo Pressure growth is calculated in WU promoted x comercial space in m2. A growth <0 means a mix of less WU promoted and/ or less commerical m2.

The detailed promo pressure growth by player shows the correlation between number of pages downsize and promo pressure reduction.

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 17: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

Share of voice of retailersShare of voice of retailers

2011 vs 2010

Page 18: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

PROMO MECHANISMS*PROMO MECHANISMS*

2011 vs 2010

46,4 % + 13,7%

Q1 2012

Growth v/s Y-1

PRODUCTS WITH CONSUMER ADVANTAGES

In 2012 46,6% promotions are supported by on or more Promo Mechanism. This trend growth about almost 14% versus last year.

*Promo Mechanisms are all added advanatges given to the shoppers like BOGOF, loyality programs, presents , etc

Page 19: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

PROMO MECHANISMS*PROMO MECHANISMS*

46,4 % + 13,7%

What kind of Promo Mechanisms are used, and how did their frequency growth v/s last year.

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 20: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

PROMO MECHANISMS*PROMO MECHANISMS*

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 21: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

PROMO MECHANISMS*PROMO MECHANISMS*

Products with consumer advantages by retailer

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 22: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

Promo Flash of food retailers in 20’top

QUALITY KPIQUALITY KPI

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 23: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

INDICATOR OF READABILITYINDICATOR OF READABILITY

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Number of WU/ Pages

Page 24: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

Promo Flash of food retailers in 20’top

RETAILERSRETAILERS

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 25: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

ALMA MARKETALMA MARKET

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 26: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

LIDLLIDL

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 27: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

POLO MARKETPOLO MARKET

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 28: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

REAL REAL

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 29: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

CARREFOURCARREFOUR

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 30: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

EUROCASHEUROCASH

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 31: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

KAUFLANDKAUFLAND

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 32: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

TESCOTESCO

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 33: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

INTERMARCHEINTERMARCHE

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 34: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

SELGROSSELGROS

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 35: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

BIEDRONKA BIEDRONKA

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 36: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

TOPAZTOPAZ

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 37: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

DELIMADELIMA

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 38: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

BOMIBOMI

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 39: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

DINODINO

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 40: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

E.LECLERCE.LECLERC

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 41: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

MAKROMAKRO

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 42: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

STOKROTKA STOKROTKA

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 43: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

SANO SANO

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 44: Pl promo review Q1 12 vs 11

Thank you for your attention.

For questions or live comment of these results, feel free to contact us:

Monika Rybczak Business Unit Manager - [email protected]+48 693 100 960

Follow us on social networks for more Markets Intelligence