Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns...

16
Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Transcript of Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns...

Page 1: Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation

Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy

Dorry Segev Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Page 2: Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Kidney paired donation (KPD)

Page 3: Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Graph: recipient / donor pairs

Donor: BRecipient: A

Donor: ARecipient: B

Donor: ORecipient: A

XM+

Donor: ARecipient: O

Pair 2

Pair 1 Pair 4

Pair 3

NODE:An

incompatible donor /

recipient pair

EDGE: Connects two

pairs if an exchange is

possible

Page 4: Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

78

9101112

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2728

29 30 3132

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

Page 5: Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

78

9101112

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2728

29 30 3132

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

Page 6: Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

78

9101112

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

23

24

25

26

2728

29 30 3132

33

34

35

36

37

39

Page 7: Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

78

9101112

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2728

29 30 3132

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

Arrival-order matching:When a pair arrives, match with one of the compatible pairs enrolled to date.

Only 10 of 40 patients get a transplant

Page 8: Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

78

9101112

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2728

29 30 3132

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

Maximum cardinality matching:Paths, Trees, and Flowers, Edmonds (1965)

14 of 40 get transplants

Page 9: Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Page 10: Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Page 11: Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Page 12: Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Simulated patients and social networks

PatientSibling

Sibling

Mother Father

Child Child

Spouse

Friend

Each Patient has between 1-4 available donors

Relation-ship of Donor %

Parent 19.7

Child 16.8

Sibling 42.4

Spouse 10.0

Friend 11.2

Gentry, Segev, et al. 2005. Am J Transplant.

Page 13: Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Blood-type inheritance

MotherAA

FatherBO

RecipientAO

SpouseOO

SiblingAB

DaughterOO

SonAO

FriendBO

Page 14: Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Decision tree model of family

Potential donors

Medical workup (pass 56% or 75%),

crossmatch tests (11%), bloodtyping

Incompatibledonor/recipient

pairsDirect donation

2406-4443 pairs annually

No willing, healthy donor

Simulate until reach# of real live donors (6468)

Page 15: Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Match % and travel in KPD

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

First-A Optimized First-A Optimized

None All Travel

%Must Travel

%No Travel

%Must Travel

%No Travel

Page 16: Pi Day: Optimization for kidney paired donation Sommer Gentry U.S. Naval Academy Dorry Segev Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Numerical impact of KPD

2406-4443 pairs predicted to present yearly About half of these pairs can match through

live donor paired donation $340 million saved over dialysis using

maximum edge weight matching for kidney paired donation

20% increase in living donor kidney transplantation

(Segev, Gentry, et al., JAMA, 2005)