Phytoremediation of TCE at Two Superfund Sites
Transcript of Phytoremediation of TCE at Two Superfund Sites
Phytoremediation of TCE at Two Superfund Sites
Bioactive Zone
GW FlowGW Flow
Assessing Methanotroph Activity in the Rhizosphere
Angela S. Lindner, Ph.D.Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida
Email: [email protected]
Personnel Related to This Project
• Graduate Research Assistant: – Ms. Adriana Pacheco, EES, UF
• Collaborators:– Dr. Donald Rockwood, Forestry, UF– Dr. Jud Isebrands, Environmental
Forestry Consultants, New London, WI– Dr. Robin Brigmon, Savannah River
Laboratory, Aiken, SC
• UF SBRP Directors:– Dr. Margaret James – Dr. Steve Roberts
Web page: www.superfund.ufl.edu
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Overview• Background
– Phytoremediation– Description of
Superfund sites in this study
• Broad goals and specific aims
• Initial results• Current focus
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Phytoremediation of Contaminants
Focus of this studySource:
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Two Superfund Sites
LaSalle,Illinois(LaSalleElectricUtilities)
Aiken,S.C.(SavannahRiverEcologyLabs, SRS)
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Description of the Sites
LaSalle
• Former electric utility manufacturing capacitors and in operation between 1943-1982
• Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) detected in groundwater
• Plant species used in PCE site:– PCE site: poplar (Populus spp.) in
native soil – TCE site: juvenile poplar (Populus
spp.), willow (Salix spp.) in PVC pipes
• TCE concentration range: 4-254 ppb
• PCE concentration range: 6-838 ppb
SRS
• Constructed in the 1950s to produce basic materials used in nuclear weapons production. A DOE site contracted to Westinghouse Savannah River Company LLC.
• Variety of contaminants, including tritium and plutonium. TCE plume in a seepage successional ecosystem.
• Plant species:– Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) in
native soil (20 years old)
• TCE concentration range: 6-20 ppb– Dechlorination products also detected.
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Broad Goals
• Assess the differences in methanotrophicpopulation diversity and activity potentials observed in rhizosphere samples from a variety of plant species in two U.S. regions
• Verify relationships between plant species and methanotrophic population diversity and activity by simulating bench-scale phytoremediation
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Three Levels of Study in the SBRP Phytoremediation Project
Laboratory
Field
Pilot
Pure culture
Enrichments
Root
sam
ples
La S
alle,
IL
SRS, Aiken, SC
Specific Aims:
1. Microbial Community and Activity Analysis of Rhizosphere Samples
2. Laboratory Enrichments and Activity Measurements
3. Bench-scale Studies
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Questions Addressed Here
• Specific Aim 1: Rhizosphere Samples – How do heterotrophic and methanotrophic counts and activity differ
• By plant type?• In roots and soil?• With nonvegetated controls?• With different moisture levels?
• Specific Aim 2: Enrichments and Pure Cultures– What effect do terpenes have on TCE biodegradation processes
involving methanotrophs? – What are the dominant methanotroph species?
7
2
34
56
CH3 10
1
CH38CH3 9
alpha-pinene
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Sampling Protocol
Bottom layerAprox. 75 cm
Middle layer
Aprox. 45 cm
0 – 15 cm Top layer
15 – 30 cm
3 species: Loblolly pine (SRS)
Poplar (LaSalle) Willow (LaSalle)
2 seasons: Mid Summer Mid Winter
24 samples
(Treatment #1)
+ 24 samples
(Treatment #2) +
16 samples (Treatment #3)
4 composite soil depth samples x x =
Overall sample load: 64 samples
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Sampling Schedule
LaSalle
2003 20052004
Jul Jul Feb/Mar
SRS
1 Year – Plant growth(time changes)
Season change
HIGH RootProduction
LOW RootProduction
Season change
LaSalle
2003 20052004
Jul Jul Feb/Mar
SRS
1 Year – Plant growth(time changes)
Season change
HIGH RootProduction
LOW RootProduction
Season change
2003 20052004
Jul Jul Feb/Mar
SRS
1 Year – Plant growth(time changes)
Season change
HIGH RootProduction
LOW RootProduction
Season change
Next sampling at both sites: February/March 2005
Benefits of Sampling Protocol:
Allows for determining effects of stage of plant growth, season, and plant
maintenance techniques on populations and activities
Comparison of both sites will provide insight into effects of climate, plant age,
site characteristics, and plant type.
July 2003 July 2004Lindner Group, UF, 2004
La Salle Site Sampling
TCE Site
PCE Site
N
3.82 ppb
Flowdirection
High[PCE] Low
[PCE]
High[TCE]
Low[TCE]
16.9 ppb
TCE
ND
PCE
2.6 ppb
ND
18.2 ppbND
254 ppb4.73 ppb
6.63 ppb 838 ppb
Monitoring WellsSept 2002
X
X
XGrass & Clovercover
X Control
X X
XX
X Sampled area
TCE Site
PCE Site
N
3.82 ppb
Flowdirection
High[PCE] Low
[PCE]
High[TCE]
Low[TCE]
16.9 ppb
TCE
ND
PCE
2.6 ppb
ND
18.2 ppbND
254 ppb4.73 ppb
6.63 ppb 838 ppb
Monitoring WellsSept 2002
X
X
XGrass & Clovercover
X Control
XX XX
XXXX
XX Sampled area
TCE Site
PCE Site
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
SRSSampling
Sampled area
Trichloroethylene plumes in C-Area
Twin Lakes Wetland
TCE concentrations: 6-20 ppb
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Microbial Counts in 2003 La Salle Samples
Low [TCE] Willow S365
Soil depth (cm)
0-15
15-30
30-60
60-90
log
(cel
l cou
nt o
r MPN
) g-1
soi
l
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
CFU hts-soilMPN mts-soil
0-15
15-30
30-60
60-90 0-1
515
-3030
-6060
-90
High [TCE]Willow S365
Control
ND ND NDND
Control(grass cover)
0-15
15-30
30-60
60-90
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10Low [PCE]
Soil depth (cm)
0-15
15-30
30-60
60-90lo
g (c
ell c
ount
or M
PN) g
-1 d
ry s
oil o
r fre
sh ro
ot
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
CFU hts-soil CFU hts-roots MPN mts-soilMPN mts-roots
High[PCE]
0-15
15-30
30-60
60-90
* *
TCE Site PCE Site
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Microbial Counts in 2003 SRS Samples
T re e # 1
S o il d e p th (c m )
0-15
15-30
30-60
60-90
90-120
log
(cel
l cou
nt o
r MPN
) g-1
dry
soi
l
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
C F U h ts -s o ilM P N m ts -s o il
T re e # 2
0-15
15-30
30-60
60-90
90-120
T re e # 3
0-15
15-30
30-60
60-90
90-120
C o n tro l
0-15
15-30
30-60
60-90
90-120
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Summary of Microbial Counts
Microbial populations counts Soil characteristics
Heterotrophs (CFU)
Methanotrophs (MPN) S
ite
Co
nta
min
an
t
Soil (g-1 dry soil)
Root (g-1 fresh root)
Soil (g-1 dry soil)
Root (g-1 fresh root)
Water content
(%) pH
[TCE] or
[PCE] (ppb)
TC
E
108 - 109 (108) 109 - 1010 105 - 106
(105 - 106) 104 - 107
2 - 20
(11 - 21) 7 - 8(7 - 8) 4 - 254
LaS
alle
PC
E
106 - 108 (105 - 106) 108 - 109 104 - 106
(102 - 106) 103 - 105 9 - 33 (9 - 17)
6 - 8(6 - 7) ND - 838
SR
S
TC
E
106 - 109 (106) NA 101 - 104
(103 - 105) NA 12 – 100 4 - 5
(5) 6 - 20 (12-17)
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Specific Aim 2• Impacts of alpha-pinene on TCE oxidation by
pure methanotrophs:
– Type I: Methylobacter album BG8– Type II: Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b– Type X: Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath)
• Activity and initial phylogenetic characterization of methanotrophic enrichments from field samples
H3C CH39 8
alpha-pinene1
2
47
35
6
H3C10
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Known Environmental Pathways of TCE: Aerobic Conditions
ClCl
HCl
TCEClCl
HCl
TCEClCl
HCl
TCEsMMO
tol-2-MO tol DO
O
O
Cl
Cl
Cl
HH
H
chloral hydrate
ClCl
Cl
O
H
TCE epoxide
O
O-
O
H O-
O
+
glyoxalate formate
formate dehydrogenase
CO2
O
O-
Cl
Cl
ClO
Cl
Cl
Cl HH
H
O
O-
Cl
ClH CO
O
O-
O
H+ + + O
-O
H
trichloroacetate trichloroethanol dichloroacetate
glyoxalate formate
sMMOdehydrogenase
tol-2-MO
•Most methanotrophscan express particulate methane monooxygenase(pMMO).
•Some methanotrophscan also express soluble methane monooxygenase(sMMO).
•pMMO and sMMO can oxidize TCE.
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Pure Culture Studies:Oxygen Uptake Analysis to
Measure the Effect of α-Pinene on TCE Oxidation
Norm
alized O2 Uptake R
ate
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6TCE TCE + (R)A-Pinene
(R)A-Pinene(R)A-Pinene + TCE
NA
Time (s)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
% D
O
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
cells A-PineneTCE
Norm
alized O2 Uptake R
ate
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6TCE TCE + (R)A-Pinene
(R)A-Pinene(R)A-Pinene + TCE
NA
Time (s)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
% D
O
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
cells A-PineneTCE
Figure 1. Diagram of oxygen uptake reactorFigure 1. Diagram of oxygen uptake reactor
% DO
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Methanotrophs +
1. TCE alone2. α-Pinene alone3. TCE + α-Pinene
Ra t e
s are normalizedto methane to produce a dimensionless measure of oxygen uptake.
Pure Culture Studies: Effect of alpha-Pinene
on TCE Oxidation
A
TCE and (R)-α-pinene concentrations (ppm)
0 20 40 60Nor
mal
ized
rate
of o
xyge
n up
take
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
OB3b sMMO TCE vs Col 2 OB3b sMMO TCE vs Col 5
B
0 20 40 60
C
0 20 40 60
D
0 20 40 60
E
0 20 40 60
A
α
0 20 40 60Cha
nge
in th
e no
rmal
ized
oxy
gen
upta
ke
rate
in th
e pr
esen
ce o
f 20
ppm
TC
E
-0.09
-0.06
-0.03
0.00
0.03
0.06
0.09 B
0 20 40 60
C
0 20 40 60
D
0 20 40 60
E
0 20 40 60
IncreaseD
ecrease
(R)- -pinene concentration (ppm)
Pure methanotrophs withalpha-pinene and TCE separately
Effect of alpha-pinene on oxygenuptake rates at 20 ppm TCE
KEY:A, B: M. trichosporium OB3b cultured without and with copper, respectively. C, D: M. capsulatus [Bath] cultured without and with copper, respectively. E: M. album BG8 cultured with copper.● TCE○ R-α-pinene
Pacheco and Lindner. 2004. BECT. In press.
Description of Enriched Mixed Cultures
• Stable mixed methanotrophic-heterotrophic cultures were isolated from the rhizosphere of poplar (LaSalle), willow (LaSalle), and loblolly pine (SRS) trees.
• All mixed cultures can use methane as the only carbon source and exhibit sMMO activity when cultured without copper.
• The LaSalle cultures were shown to be capable of oxidizing TCE and alpha-pinene.
• All three cultures exhibited methane oxidation activity…..
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Activity of LaSalle Enrichments in the Presence of CH4
TCE Zone: Cultures isolated from rhizosphere soil samples of all tree types
• PCE Site
Plant type
Type II-OB3b Control/Grass Poplar
Oxy
gen
upta
ke ra
te (u
mol
/s)
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Plant type
Type II-OB3b Poplar Willow Loblolly pine
Oxy
gen
upta
ke ra
te (u
mol
/s)
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06NMS medium (sMMO)NMS w/Cu medium (pMMO)
NA
Root Soil
Oxy
gen
upta
ke ra
te (u
mol
/s)
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030Low [TCE]High [TCE]
(Control)
A
B
Oxy
gen
upta
ke ra
te (u
mol
/s)
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Plant type
Type II-OB3b Poplar Willow Loblolly pine
Oxy
gen
upta
ke ra
te (u
mol
/s)
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06NMS medium (sMMO)NMS w/Cu medium (pMMO)
NA
Root Soil
Oxy
gen
upta
ke ra
te (u
mol
/s)
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030Low [TCE]High [TCE]
(Control)
A
B
Oxy
gen
upta
ke ra
te (u
mol
/s)
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06NMS medium (sMMO)NMS w/Cu medium (pMMO)
Root Soil
Oxy
gen
upta
ke ra
te (u
mol
/s)
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030Low [PCE]High [PCE]
A
B
(Control)
PCE Zone:Culture isolated from rhizosphere soil samples of poplar trees
Plant type
Type II-OB3b Poplar
NMS medium (sMMO)NMS w/Cu medium (pMMO)
Root Soil
Oxy
gen
upta
ke ra
te (u
mol
/s)
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030Low [PCE]High [PCE]
NA
A
B
(Control)Plant type
Type II-OB3b Poplar
NMS medium (sMMO)NMS w/Cu medium (pMMO)
Root Soil
Oxy
gen
upta
ke ra
te (u
mol
/s)
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030Low [PCE]High [PCE]
NA
A
B
(Control)
Cultures isolated from poplar soil and root samples
Activity of SRS Enrichments in the Presence of CH4
Plant type
Type II-OB3b Control Pine 1 Pine 3
Oxy
gen
upta
ke ra
te (u
mol
/s)
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
NMS (sMMO)NMS w/Cu (pMMO)
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Development of PhylogeneticAnalysis of Rhizosphere Enrichments
from LaSalle/TCE Site
• Based on the nucleotide sequence of the pmoA geneobtained from a rhizosphereroot sample
• Length of branches is proportional to % dissimilarity (0.1 base changes per nucleotide sequence position)
• Rhizosphere samples placed in a separated branch (high % dissimilarity)
• Closest branch to rhizospheresamples dominated by uncultured bacteria from peatsoils and soda lake sediments
0.1
Uncultured bacterium RB-16 (AY236517.1)
Uncultured bacterium SL4.121 (AY550719.1)
Uncultured bacterium SL.1.15 (AY550689.1)51
Uncultured bacterium SL5.24 (AY550728.1)
Uncultured bacterium MLM52 (AY572002.1)
Uncultured bacterium MLM46 (AY572001.1)73
29
Uncultured bacterium RB-100 (AY236083.1)
Uncultured bacterium SL1.22 (AY550691.1)
100
Uncultured bacterium A55 (AY488061.1)
Rhizosphere sample #1
Rhizosphere sample #4
Rhizosphere sample #1045
10049
63
Methanotrophic bacterium LK5 (AF533663.1)
Uncultured bacterium LOPB13.2 (AF358052.1)
Uncultured bacterium Maahas2 (AJ430797.1)
Methylobacter sp. BB5.1 (AF016982.1)
Uncultured bacterium 5hm22 (AY236085.1)
Uncultured bacterium 1HM25 (AY550699.1)
Uncultured bacterium MLM3 (AY571996.1)
Uncultured bacterium MLM27 (AY571995.1)
Uncultured bacterium MLM6 (AY572003.1)67
62
81
47
100
73
35
74
100
89
Uncultured bacterium SL1.79 (AY550707.1)
Uncultured bacterium SL1.119 (AY550708.1)42
42
0.1
Uncultured bacterium RB-16 (AY236517.1)
Uncultured bacterium SL4.121 (AY550719.1)
Uncultured bacterium SL.1.15 (AY550689.1)51
Uncultured bacterium SL5.24 (AY550728.1)
Uncultured bacterium MLM52 (AY572002.1)
Uncultured bacterium MLM46 (AY572001.1)73
29
Uncultured bacterium RB-100 (AY236083.1)
Uncultured bacterium SL1.22 (AY550691.1)
100
Uncultured bacterium A55 (AY488061.1)
Rhizosphere sample #1
Rhizosphere sample #4
Rhizosphere sample #1045
10049
63
Methanotrophic bacterium LK5 (AF533663.1)
Uncultured bacterium LOPB13.2 (AF358052.1)
Uncultured bacterium Maahas2 (AJ430797.1)
Methylobacter sp. BB5.1 (AF016982.1)
Uncultured bacterium 5hm22 (AY236085.1)
Uncultured bacterium 1HM25 (AY550699.1)
Uncultured bacterium MLM3 (AY571996.1)
Uncultured bacterium MLM27 (AY571995.1)
Uncultured bacterium MLM6 (AY572003.1)67
62
81
47
100
73
35
74
100
89
Uncultured bacterium SL1.79 (AY550707.1)
Uncultured bacterium SL1.119 (AY550708.1)42
42
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Conclusions to Date• Specific Aim 1
– Results from the field have shown that willows, loblolly pine, and certain clones of poplars have been shown to uptake PCE and TCE at both sites.
– Heterotroph and methanotroph counts in the 2003 root and soil samples seem to be impacted most by soil moisture content, soil/root location, and possibly tree type.
• Effects of age and tree growth at both sites will be determined by comparing 2004 counts to the 2003 counts.
• Specific Aim 2– alpha-Pinene impacts TCE oxidation; however, with different effects
depending on the methanotroph type.– Mixed cultures isolated from the roots and soil of each tree type are capable
of oxidizing methane, TCE, and alpha-pinene. Differences in oxidation potential exist depending on rhizosphere origin (soil or root), tree type, and MMO expression.
• These initial results emphasize the importance of characterizing each phytoremediation site for type of methanotrophs present, bioavailablecopper concentrations, and contaminant oxidation potentials.
Lindner Group, UF, 2004
Current Focus– Specific Aim 1:
• Counts in one-year samples and next round of sampling• Soil testing for determining bioavailable nutrients• Protocol development
– phylogenetic analysis for methanotrophic diversity in soil and root samples
– stable-isotope probing (14CH4) of samples for methanotrophic activity
– Specific Aim 2:• Protocol development for analysis for products of alpha-pinene and
TCE oxidation by pure methanotrophs
Lindner Group, UF, 2004