Phytoremdiation of salt and the influence of salt on...

14
Phytoremediation of salt to directly and indirectly to recover land and revenue Erick A Carlson

Transcript of Phytoremdiation of salt and the influence of salt on...

Phytoremediation of salt to directly and indirectly to recover land and revenue

Erick A Carlson

Outline

Introduce the Salt Problem: too much salt = high blood pressure, osmotic stress, soil disturbance, water quality, etc.

Propose Plant Based Solutions: attack causes of saline levels

Discuss Several Cases Studies: recovering Ag productivity and direct phytoremediation

KEY Info to look for:

-Why are high levels of salt bad for plants? -What are potential sources of salt? -A method for treating high salinity (i.e what to plant and where).

Causes/Sources

Natural weathering of salty parent material (ancient seafloors)

Irrigation with saline groundwater

Clean irrigation water traveling through saline parent material/soils

High water tables from plant cover changes

Salt “pollution”

Problems

Osmotic stress osmotic strength of soil is increased under saline conditions, i.e. soil holds water more tightly.

Internal plant toxicity Chlorine (Cl) is a micro nutrient, but in high levels can “burn” the tissues of plants from the inside out.

Results

Reduced crop yields

Damage to soil permeability

Salt “pollution”

Solutions Flush root zone in winter/pre sowing to aid in germination (susceptible life stage)

Reduce groundwater recharge Plant salt tolerant crops or buffer species

Percent Salt

Reduction

Amount of Water Required

50% 6 inches

80% 12 inches

90% 24 inches

Salt “pollution”

List of Case Studies

Recovery of Agricultural Productivity

Bartle (2006) Australia

Bennett and Virtue (2004) Australia

Direct Phytoremediation

Banuelos and Lin (2005), Freeman and Banuelos (2011) – California

Recovery of Agricultural Productivity: Non-Food Crops in Western Australia

Bartle (2006)

PROBLEM Previously stable salts in deep strata are flushed to the surface

through increased deep infiltration through irrigation.

Shift from deep rooted woody species to shallow rooted annual species has allowed the water tables to rise.

Salts move upward as water tables rise.

These can then move laterally, come to the surface, or enter river/ stream channels

5 million hectares negatively affected (almost the size of West Virginia)

Slim profit margins of pasture, food and fiber crops make them susceptible to base level reductions in harvest.

Recovery of Agricultural Productivity: Non-Food Crops in Western Australia

Bartle (2006)

SOLUTION Perennial, deep rooted crops to lower water tables.

Present species in area not economically viable (would be water stressed or

have no market value).

Use previously present NATIVE mallee eucalyptus tree

Not a large component of bioenergy, not “energy rich”, but if it can produce in marginal areas…

3 products:

eucalyptus oil

activated carbon (charcoal)

biomass generated electricity

Recovery of Agricultural Productivity: Perennial Grasses vs. Weed Introduction

Bennett and Virtue (2004)

PROBLEM

High water tables and salinity.

Lowland salinity control vs. upland weed introduction

Soil acidification from nitrate leaching.

Positive feedback loop.

1st annual crops allow water table to rise

2nd salinity builds up and begins to “poison” crops

3rd fewer and less vigorous plants growing

4th water table rises further because of reduced evapotranspiration

Recovery of Agricultural Productivity: Perennial Grasses vs. Weed Introduction

Bennett and Virtue (2004)

SOLUTION/CONSIDERATION

Lucerne shown to lower water table 3m in first year! Even after removal of lucerne, WT stays low.

Legumes like lucerne use nitrates at a high rate and are perennial so they use nitrates when annual crops are not in the field.

Total area affected by salinity likely much greater than the influence of any single weed species

Potential hybridization with native species; also considered in US.

Use of introduced species to solve problem and provide economic benefit.

Currently World Trade Organization use of “sanitary and phytosanitary” measures do not include potential benefits of introductions, very restrictive

Weeds to control other weeds

Direct Phytoremediation: Salinity Considerations in Selenium Management – California

Banuelos and Lin (2005), Freeman and Banuelos (2011)

Location: San Luis Drain (Central California)

Pollutant: Selenium

Salt Problem: Lowers biomass of phytoremediation species, making it ineffective

Salt Solution: Amend soils to lower salinity levels and increase biomass of salt tolerant species (cordgrass, canola, fescue, salado grass) that can also take up Selenium

Bioaccumulation

Source of pollutant

Conclusion

Salt is rough on plants via water gathering and internal toxicity

Potential sources of salt are: (#1) GIVE 1 SOURCE

Much of the work with salinity has been on recovering agricultural resource (per the case studies)

What is (#2a) 1 PLANT CHARACTERISITC that is beneficial for phytoremediation of saline soils and (2b) WHERE ON THE LANDSCAPE would it be advantageous to plant these?

Work Cited 1. Banuelos, GS and Lin, Z-Q. 2005. Phytoremediation management of selenium-laden drainage sediments in the San Luis

Drain: a greenhouse feasibility study. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 62: 309-316.

2. Bartle, J. 2006. New non-food crops and industries for Australian dryland agriculture. Green Processing: 3rd International Conference on the Sustainable Processing of Minerals, Newcastle, Australia. 63-68.

3. Bennett, SJ and Virtue, JG. 2004. Salinity mitigation versus weed risks – can conflicts of interest in introducing new plants be resolved. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44: 1141-1156.

4. Cardon, GE; Davis, JG; Bauder, TA; Waskom, RM. 2012. Managing Saline Soils. Colorado State University Extensiuon. Accessed: http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/crops/00503.html

5. Condor Earth Technologies. 2012. Calculation of agronomic rates for landscape irrigation of recycled water at La Contenta Golf Course. Accessed: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/water_recycling_policy/docs/applicants/ lacontenta/lacontenta_irri.pdf

6. de Koning, M. The influence of de-icing salts on the remobilozation of heavy metals in an artificial wetland. Accessed: http://www.citg.tudelft.nl/over-faculteit/afdelingen/watermanagement/secties/waterhuishouding/leerstoelen /waterbeheer/onderzoek/alle-projecten/afstudeeronderzoeken/afgeronde-afstudeeronderzoeken/000-koning-mk-de/remobilization-of-pollutants/

7. Eaton, FM. 1942. Toxicity and accumulation of chlorine and sulfate salts in plants. Journal of Agriculture Research 64: 357-399.

8. Fillery, I; Poulter, R; Zhu, C; Rippey, J; Godwin, C; Smettem, K. 2001. Sustainable management of soil, water and nutrients in high and medium rainfall zone of Western Australia. Western Australia Soil Acidity Research and Development Update, Perth.

9. Freeman, J. and Banuelos, G. 2011. Selection of superior salt/boron tolerant Stanleya pinnata genotypes and quantification of their selenium phytoremediation abilities in drainage sediment. Environmental Science and Technology 45: 9703-9710.

10. Pavelic, P; Dillion, PJ; Narayan, KA; Herrman, TN; Barnett, SR. 1997. Integrated groundwater flow and agronomic modelling for management of dryland salinity of a coastal plain in southern Australia. Agricultural Water Management 35: 75-93.

11. Munns, R. 1993. Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soil: some dogmas and hypotheses. Plant, Cell and Environment. 16: 15-24.

12. Munns, R. 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell and Environment. 25: 239-250.

13. Sheldon, A; Menzies, NW; Bing So, H; Dalal, R. 2004. The effect of salinity on plant available water. Australian New Zealand Soils Conference, Sydney.

14. Tanji, K; Grattan, S; Grieve, C; Harvirandi, A; Rollins, L; Shaw, D; Sheikh, B; Wu, L. Salt management guide for landscape irrigation with recycled water in coastal Southern California. University of California – Davis. 322 pp. Accessed: http://www.salinitymanagement.org/Literature_Review.pdf

15. University of Maryland Extension. Chlorine Toxicity. Accessed: http://plantdiagnostics.umd.edu/level3.cfm?causeID=1171

16. Manitoba Agriculture, Rural and Food Initiatives. 2009. Forages for improving saline soils. Accessed: http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/forages/bjb00s31.html