Charged Particle Multiplicity at Mid-Rapidity in Au-Au Collisions at RHIC
Photon measurements in forward rapidity Y.P. Viyogi Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre, Kolkata
-
Upload
aiko-cummings -
Category
Documents
-
view
29 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Photon measurements in forward rapidity Y.P. Viyogi Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre, Kolkata
8 Feb. 2005 1
Photon measurements in forward rapidity
Y.P. ViyogiVariable Energy Cyclotron Centre, Kolkata
ICPAQGP-2005
Kolkata, 8-12 Feb. 2005
8 Feb. 2005 2
Why measure photons in forward rapidity ?
Measuring photons in the forward rapidity is a challenge in itself.
Since photons come mostly from pi-0 decay, they complement the data on identified charged pion measurements.
In heavy ion experiments, it is important to compare similar results from different particles. It becomes necessary to measure photon production in as much detail as possible as they are the only major neutral particle amenable to detection.
8 Feb. 2005 3
Photon Multiplicity Detector (PMD)
PMD : a preshower detector measuring spatial distribution of photons in the forward rapidity region
Supplements the study of photons in the region where calorimeter cannot be used due to high particle density. Hoever, pT measurement is not poissible
PMD probes thermalisation (flow),
phase transition (multiplicity fluctuation),Chiral symmetry restoration (charged-neutral fluctuation)
pT Acceptance of PMD ~ 30 MeV/c (estimated)
8 Feb. 2005 4
PMD@SPS
Plastic Scintillator pads with wavelength shifting fibres read out using image intensifier + CCD camera systems.
3 X0 thick Lead converter
Scintillator pads of size: 15, 20, 23, 25 mm2
Building blocks of PMD
•WA93 (S + Au, 200AGeV, 1991-92) : 8000 pads in 3m2 covering 2.8 < < 5.3
NIM A372 (1996) 143
•WA98 (Pb + Pb, 158AGeV, 1994-96): 53000 pads in 21m2 covering 2.9 < < 4.2
NIM A424 (1999) 395
8 Feb. 2005 5
PMD in the WA93 Experiment
Bundle of 1900 fibres for one readout camera
Fiducial fibres2.8 < < 5.3
8 Feb. 2005 6
WA98 Experiment at CERN SPS
Each box has 1900 pads, Is read out by one II + CCD camera
28 Box modules,53000 pads
8 Feb. 2005 7
PMD @ colliders
At RHIC (STAR) and LHC (ALICE) experiments :
PMD in forward region : Detector design criteria
Confine charged particle hits to single cell to restrict occupancy and
improve photon-hadron discrimination;
Reduce cross-talk : stop -rays within a cell;
Use neutron-insensitive gas mixture (Ar +CO2)
Copper honeycomb
Closest to circular geometry
Excellent packing
Wall to stop -electrons
Cathode at high negative potential
Anode wire at ground, connected to readout
,.
Cathode extension
A small section
PCB
A unit cell
8 Feb. 2005 8
PMD in the STAR Experiment
Cell cross section : 1.0 cm2
Cell depth : 0.8 cmTotal number of cells : 82,944 Area of the detector : 4.2 m2
Distance from vertex : 540 cm Coverage: -2.3 to -3.8 in with full
NIM A499 (2003) 751
8 Feb. 2005 10
PMD in ALICE
, coverage 2.3-3.5, 2Distance from IP 361.5 cm
Cell cross-section 0.22 cm2
Cell depth 0.5 cm
Total no. of cells 221184
Unit Module, 4608 cells
NIM A488 (2002) 131
8 Feb. 2005 11
Results from PMD
1. Pseudorapidity distributions
2. Charged Neutral Fluctuation
3. Flow
8 Feb. 2005 12
Photon -distributions at the SPS
S+Au, 200A.GeV
Phys. Rev. C58 (1998)1146
Pb+Pb, 158A.GeV
Phys. Lett. B458 (1999) 422
8 Feb. 2005 14
Energy dependence of Limiting fragmentation scenario
- ybeam
dN
/d
part
See also talk by B. Mohanty in parallel session on 10/02 afternoon
STAR Collaboration, paper submitted to PRL, 4 Feb. 2005
Photon production follows the limiting fragmentation
scenario
8 Feb. 2005 15
Centrality dependence of Limiting fragmentation scenario
Photon production follows centrality independent limiting fragmentation scenario
Charged particles follow centrality dependent limiting fragmentation scenario
- ybeam
dN
/d
part
8 Feb. 2005 16
Limiting fragmentation for identified mesons
y - ybeam
dN
/d
part
Data NA49 Nch at various energiesBRAHMS Nch at 200.A GeV
STAR N0 (scaled N) at 63.A GeV
Limiting FragmentationCentrality dependent for
Inclusive charged particlesCentrality independent for
identified pions
8 Feb. 2005 17
Chiral Symmetry Restoration : DCC
Look at N vs. Nch fluctuations
At T > Tc : Chiral symmetry restored
Vacuum expectation value of chiral field is zero.
At T < Tc : Chiral symmetry broken
Vacuum may be oriented in one of the pion directions (disoriented wrt normal vacuum directions)
Disoriented chiral condensates (DCC) formed in domains of (η,φ) : emission of low pt pions
Distribution of neutral pion fraction (ƒ) very different for DCC and generic events
π° 2 : shows up in photon detectors
π : shows up in charged particle detectors
8 Feb. 2005 18
N vs. Nch Fluctuation• Top 5% central events ONLY• Bins in
• Discrete Wavelet Analysis
• Correlation Analysis:
NormalDCC
FFC
8 Feb. 2005 19
Sensitivity to DCC Simulation with a simple DCC model : π°/ π± introduced at freezout
Mixed events for PMD/SPMD
Breaks different correlations (detector effects)
M1 : both individually mixed
M2 : Nγ and Nch from different events
M3γ : PMD no, SPMD mixed
M3ch : SPMD no, PMD mixed
nDCC : event sample with some fraction of DCC events
8 Feb. 2005 20
Formation of DCC – upper limits
0-5% central
Global DCC
Upper limit for DCC-like localized fluctuations: 1% - 0.3% for central collisions for domains of size 45°- 60° within common -coverage.
Localized DCC domain
= fraction of pions as DCC pions
Phys. Lett. B420 (1998) 169Phys. Rev. C67 (2003) 044901
0-5% central
5-10% central
8 Feb. 2005 21
Charged particle depleted events
Anti-CENTAURO event of JACEE36 photons, 1 charged particle
An event of WA98 PMD – SPMD
84 photons, 12 charged particle=2.9-3.75, =90°
8 Feb. 2005 22
Inspection of event structure
• Scan the entire azimuthal range by
opening a window • Gradually slide the window by 2°
• Calculate ƒ = N*0.5/(N*0.5+Nch)
for each window.
• Find maximum value of ƒ in an event
represented by ƒmax .
Δη
Δφ patch
Details of SWM : See Poster by M.M. Aggarwal et al.
Sliding Window Method (SWM)
PMD-SPMDOverlap zone
Study photon-excess (exotic) regions, f > 0.55 higher purity of photon sample
8 Feb. 2005 23
Neutral fraction distribution
Randomly selected patchesMean = 0.342, Sigma = 0.046
ƒmax in data extends to ~ 0.7, ~8 away from mean of ƒ
150K events, top 10% centrality
8 Feb. 2005 24
Checking instrumental problems
Exotic patches uniformly distributed in azimuthDetector artifacts ruled out after various studies
8 Feb. 2005 25
Exotic patches > 60°
After selecting a patch of = 60°, window size is increased in steps of 2° on both sides till ƒ remains > 0.55
Suggesting the presence of many patches of larger sizes
8 Feb. 2005 26
Statistical Significance
Scatter plot of N and Nch differences for exotic and normal patches in exotic events
Mostly positive N and negative Nch differences
eN - N
n
nN
ch -
Nch
e
8 Feb. 2005 27
Non-statistical fluctuation in f
N-Nch
N = ------------ (N+Nch )½
Genuine photon excess and depletion of charged particles beyond statistical fluctuations
Normal patches, peak ~ 0.35
Exotic patches, peak ~ 4.5
8 Feb. 2005 28
Comparison of Data with Mixed and V+G Events
It is observed that events with large ƒ are more frequent in data as compared to those seen in mixed and V+G events.
Patches with ƒ > 0.55, which are 4.5 away from mean of ƒ distribution have been labeled as ‘exotic’ patches.
Percentage of events having patches with ƒmax > 0.55
Case Percentage Data 0.39±0.016(stat.)+0.17(syst.)-0.20(syst.) Mixed 0.081±0.007(stat.) V+G 0.013±0.008(stat.)
All SWM results of WA98 expt. are preliminary
8 Feb. 2005 29
Charged-neutral correlation in STAR
PMD behind Forward TPC, which measures charged particle pT
Cut on pt (ch) greatly enhances the strength
χ
8 Feb. 2005 30
Thermalisation : Flow
---dφ
~ 1 + 2 Σ vn cos nφ
v1 : shift of centroid, v2 : measure of ellipticity
Ψ1 , Ψ2 : specify orientation
n=1 : directedn=2 : elliptic
Pressure gradient in the overlap zone
collective flow in the reaction plane
Initial space anisotropy
Carried to final state momentum anisotropy
8 Feb. 2005 31
Azimuthal Anisotropy : WA93 PMD
First observation ofCollective Flow at SPS Energy
Second order anisotropy coeff. (elliptic flow) of photons
v2
Contribution from π°decay
Phys. Lett. B403 (1997) 390
8 Feb. 2005 32
Anisotropy in Neutral Pions
-------- = ---------- + c, Vin(π°) (χ –b)²
Scaling relation
Simulation of a large number of data set for various combinations of flow and
multiplicity
Parameter m can be determined from experimental data
Constants a,b,c depend on the order of anisotropy
Phys. Lett. B489 (2000) 9.
8 Feb. 2005 33
Directed and Elliptic Flow of Charged particles (WA98 SPMD)
Syst. Err. Due toVertex shift
8 Feb. 2005 35
Photon Flow (WA98 PMD)
Simulation : use pi-0 flow = charged particle flow, include decay and kinematics. Shaded regions indicate simulation uncertainties.
8 Feb. 2005 36
Comparison of PMD and LEDA v2
Paper submitted to EPJ , See also Poster by Raniwala et al.
8 Feb. 2005 37
Possibilities at the LHC
PMD in ALICE extends from =2.3 to =3.5, depending on the pseudorapidity density, it should intercept 1000-3000 particles. One can study anisotropy with an accuracy of better than 3%.
Event plane determined from the PMD can be used to study correlations with other observables.
PMD has complete overlap with FMD, the charged particle multiplicity detector in the forward region. Should permit the study of charged neutral fluctuations.
Non-statistical fluctuation in multiplicity, to the level of 2% or more, should be observable in the PMD.
Source : PMD TDRCERN/LHCC 99-32, CERN/LHCC 2003-038
8 Feb. 2005 38
Summary
It is important to measure photon production in as much detailand in as much extended part of phase space as possible. The results at RHIC show that these measurements arecomplementing the identified pion data.
Measuring photon multiplicity is important for the study ofcharged-neutral fluctuation. Preliminary results from WA98Expt. are quite interesting. This can be studied further both at RHIC (STAR) and at LHC (ALICE).
PMD will remain an important detector component to studyanisotropy and flow even at LHC.
8 Feb. 2005 39
The PMD Team
WA93VECC, Chandigarh, Jaipur, Jammu, GSI
WA98VECC, Bhubaneswar, Chandigarh, Jaipur, Jammu, GSI
STARVECC, Bhubaneswar, Chandigarh, Jaipur, Jammu, IITB
ALICEVECC, Bhubaneswar, Chandigarh, Jaipur, Jammu, IITB, BARC
8 Feb. 2005 41
(I) Time-specific detectors’ malfunctioning - Examining immediate preceding and succeeding events
Application to ….
Sept 21, 2004 Physics Forum,ALICE WEEK
Checks to rule out detector artifacts
ƒ distribution peaks around 0.35, similar to that of generic events
8 Feb. 2005 42
Application to ….
Sept 21, 2004 Physics Forum,ALICE WEEK
Checks to rule out detector artifacts
(II) Distribution of exotic patches in azimuth
Uniformly distributed