Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

29
Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA Visible and Near- Infrared Systems and Publicly-Available Products for Studies of Seasonal Snow Cover Dorothy K. Hall Cryospheric Sciences Laboratory NASA / GSFC, Greenbelt, Md. NASA Snow Remote Sensing Workshop CIRES - University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado 14 August 2013

description

Visible and Near-Infrared Systems and Publicly-Available Products for Studies of Seasonal Snow Cover. Dorothy K. Hall. Cryospheric Sciences Laboratory NASA / GSFC, Greenbelt, Md. NASA Snow Remote Sensing Workshop CIRES - University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

Page 1: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

Visible and Near-Infrared Systems and Publicly-Available Products for

Studies of Seasonal Snow Cover

Dorothy K. Hall

Cryospheric Sciences LaboratoryNASA / GSFC, Greenbelt, Md.

NASA Snow Remote Sensing WorkshopCIRES - University of Colorado

Boulder, Colorado14 August 2013

Page 2: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

snowcrystals.com

What advances have led to the current state of snow mapping

using visible and near-IR sensors?

Page 3: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

Image from TIROS-1, the First Successful Weather Satellite

TIROS=Television and Infrared Observation Satellite

TIROS provided data for the first accurate weather forecasts based on data gathered from space.

TIROS began continuous coverage of the Earth's weather in 1962.

From NASA: http://www.earth.nasa.gov/history/tiros/tiros.html

Page 4: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

Snow Mapping from Space in 1962

Page 5: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

Issues in the 1960s

•Spatial resolution

•Snow / cloud discrimination

•Snow depth

Page 6: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

From: Barnes & Bowley, 1966, WRR, 4(2):257-272.

Snow Extent and Snow Depth Mapping from Space - 1966

Accuracy of snow mapping from TIROS or ESSA data was estimated to be ±32 km in 1966

Apt is automatic picture transmission

Page 7: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

NOAA visible climate data record

1973 1998 2007

Nov 1966

Oct 1972

May 1975 1980-81 1990s

May 1999

Feb 1997 Feb 2004

ESSA, NOAA, GOESSeries

Weekly 190 kmdigitized

METEOSAT&

GMS added

Reanalysis of 1966-71

IMS 24 km IMS 4 km7

Slide courtesy of Dave Robinson/Rutgers Univ.

The NESDIS product had not been envisioned at first as a CDR; more standardized mapping was instituted in the 1970s.

Page 8: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

•Launch of ERTS-1 (Landsat-1) in 1972 allowed snow-cover mapping at ~80-m spatial resolution once every 18 days, cloud-cover permitting;

Progress in the 1970s

Page 9: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

From Colvocoresses, 1976

ERTS-1 (Landsat-1) Image of Rocky Mts., 11 January 1973

Rocky Mts.

Snow mapping was largely accomplished using hard-copy images and manual techniques in the 1970 and early 1980s.

Page 10: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

•First NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) was launched in 1978 on TIROS-N;

•NOAA NESDIS snow maps were being produced weekly for the Northern Hemisphere and in an increasingly-consistent manner.

Progress in the 1970s, cont’d.

Page 11: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

NOAA Northern Hemisphere Snow Chart

NOAA / NESDIS

NESDIS provided weekly snow maps

such as this one from 1972 – 1997

at~190 km spatial

resolution

Page 12: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

•Early Landsat (MSS): • Could not separate snow and most clouds;• Low dynamic range of MSS instrument over snow;• 18-day repeat was not frequent enough;• Cloud cover obscured the surface too often.

•Need more-frequent coverage at good spatial resolution with snow/cloud discrimination;• TM band 5 (1.6 µm)* under development for objectively separating

snow from clouds with an expected launch in 1982 (Barnes and Bowley, 1977).

Issues in the 1970s

*Decline in SWIR reflectance of snow was useful in separating snow and clouds.

Page 13: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

•Use of remotely-sensed data from satellites related to water-resources management is still lacking in several respects (V. Salomonson, in 1979):

• Spatial and spectral resolution;• Processing of high volumes of data & high data rate*;• Need 48-hour turnaround time for water-resource

managers;• High data rate conflicts with rapid turnaround of data

and ease of processing.

*We must “learn to drink from a firehose” (Salomonson & Hall 1979) referring to high data volumes to be produced by Landsat-4 TM that would be in the 107 to 108 bits/sec order of magnitude. Data rate today for Landsat-8 is ~4.5 times what it was for Landsat-4.

Issues in the 1970s

Page 14: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

•“…it seems possible to simulate discharge in ungaged sites by using Landsat images of the snow cover together with temperature and precipitation data.” (Martinec and Rango, 1979).

Progress in the 1970s, cont’d.

Page 15: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

From Rango (1980), IAHS Pub. #129

Landsat-1 image of snow cover in Wyoming, 28 June 1976, showing boundaries of the Dinwoody Creek and Bull Lake

Creek Basins

Using a zoom transfer scope, a

satellite image was superimposed on a

map and the snowline was

drawn onto the map. SCA was determined by planimetering.

Page 16: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

Landsat-1-Derived Snow Cover Estimates vs. Measured Runoff in the Wind River Range, Wyo., 1973 – 1974

From Rango and Salomonson (1975)

Page 17: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

•Image saturation in snow was improved with the larger dynamic range of the TM instruments (vs. MSS) allowed great strides to be made in mapping snow cover and albedo using Landsat data in the 1980s (e.g., Dozier, 1984 & Dozier & Marks, 1987);

•Rosenthal and Dozier (1996) present a decision-tree classification model using Landsat TM data to map fractional snow cover in the Sierra Nevada Mts;

•Landsat-7 ETM+ and the MODerate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) were launched in 1999.

Progress in the 1980s and 1990s

Page 18: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

NOAA visible climate data record

1973 1998 2007

Nov 1966

Oct 1972

May 1975 1980-81 1990s

May 1999

Feb 1997 Feb 2004

ESSA, NOAA, GOESSeries

Weekly 190 kmdigitized

METEOSAT&

GMS added

Reanalysis of 1966-71

IMS 24 km IMS 4 km18

Slide courtesy of Dave Robinson/Rutgers Univ.

Page 19: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

www.natice.noaa.gov/ims/

NOAA Interactive Multisensor Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS)

NESDIS and the National Ice

Center (NIC) have provided daily

snow maps such as this one from

1997 – present at25 km and 4

km (since 2004) spatial resolution

Page 20: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

www.natice.noaa.gov/ims/

NOAA Interactive Multisensor Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS) 1 January 2013

Page 21: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/index.php

Daily Snow Map from Rutgers University Global Snow Lab Climate Data Record of Snow-Cover Extent

1 January 2013

NESDIS & NIC maps were elevated to the status of a snow-cover extent Climate Data Record by RUCL

Page 22: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

D. Robinson / Rutgers Univ.

Northern Hemisphere monthly average snow extents since 1966*

*compared the long term average

Source: Rutgers University Global Snow Lab

Page 23: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

Publicly-Available Satellite Snow-Cover Products

National Ice Center (NIC) snow-cover map

Northeastern U.S. MODIS swath fractional

snow-cover map, MOD10_L2

MODIS monthly snow-cover map, MOD10CM

Feb. 2004

28 Dec. 2010

IMS12 Feb. 2012 Daily, weekly and monthly snow cover and SWE maps

from GlobSnow

NOHRSC modeled SWE map

1 Jan 2013

MODIS 500- Cloud-Gap-Filled Snow Map

Page 24: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

Suomi NPP Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS)* Snow-Cover Products

•Higher spatial resolution than MODIS (375 m);•Wider swath (3000 km vs. 2330 km), no orbit gaps compared to MODIS;•Primarily for operational user community;• Need NRT turnaround for weather forecasting.

•Expected continuity with MODIS to make a Climate-Data Record (CDR) of snow-cover extent.

*Launched in October 2011

Page 25: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

VIIRS Binary Snow-Cover Map*12 February 2012

*VIIRS binary snow-cover algorithm is based on the MODIS snow-cover algorithm.

cloud

cloud

cloud

snow

Page 26: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

From R. Solberg et al. http://www.globsnow.info/workshops/innsbruck/1t/SolbergSE.pdf

GlobSnow

Page 27: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

MEaSUREs Snow Product: blended MODIS, IMS and passive microwave

Slide courtesy of Dave Robinson/Rutgers Univ.

Other results from blended snow maps include those of Romanov, 2000; Hall et al., 2007; Gao et al., 2010; Foster et al., 2011;

Page 28: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

First successful weather satellite

VIIRS “Blue Marble”

April 1, 1960

Page 29: Photo credit: D.K. Hall / NASA

Conclusion•Major advances in mapping snow-cover extent and snow albedo have been enabled by technological and computational advances;

•Many early (1960s & 1970s) issues with mapping snow were addressed by the launch of new instruments (e.g., Landsat-1 MSS in 1972 and AVHRR in 1978);

•Increasingly-sophisticated instruments launched in the 1980s permitted refinement of snow-mapping capabilities (e.g., Landsat-4 and -5 TM in 1982 & 1984, and an improved AVHRR in 1981);

•MODIS and VIIRS, first launched in 1999 and 2011, respectively, allow daily snow mapping for research and operational purposes;

•Blended products, such as GlobSnow, map snow cover and SWE through clouds;

•Snow maps from vis/near-IR sensors have improved dramatically in the last ~40 years leading to great advances; far fewer advances in mapping of snow through clouds and SWE have been possible using passive-MW sensors.