Phillosophy of education

23

description

 

Transcript of Phillosophy of education

Page 1: Phillosophy of education
Page 2: Phillosophy of education

• Rights in relation toeducation may be claimed :• on behalf of children • for parents.

Page 3: Phillosophy of education

– Claims of parents against the wider community, (represented by the state)

– Claims against children themselves(the claims of parents to limit children’s freedom, require certain behaviors of them, and bring them up in certain ways of the parents’ choosing.)

Page 4: Phillosophy of education

Religious education Secular education

Page 5: Phillosophy of education

parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children

Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms

Education shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace

Page 6: Phillosophy of education

The wider adult world may also intervene to protect the child from

indoctrination or an education which in other ways falls short of that to which a

future citizen is felt to be entitled

Page 7: Phillosophy of education

places emphasis on significant differences between the concepts of socialization and education

Page 8: Phillosophy of education

Socialization› Belief› Values› Practices of existing society

Education› The development of:

The critical insight The qualities of self-assurance and self

confidence essential

› To the development of personal autonomy

Page 9: Phillosophy of education

To choose the nature of their children’s education, whether in a particular school or delivered “otherwise (quote the British 1944 Education Act)› private schools › educational selection within the state

system

Page 10: Phillosophy of education

Parents intentions in the matter of child-rearing in an era of postmodernity:› First, most children are brought into the world

voluntarily and intentionally by their parents. › Second, most children are brought up by at

least one of their parents and the majority by both.

Page 11: Phillosophy of education

expected to indicate a willingness on the part of both parents to enter into a relationship with that child when it arrives

Page 12: Phillosophy of education

DeliberationManifestation the

will and intention

Planning

Page 13: Phillosophy of education

Being prepared to care for the children› Bearing the cost› Looking after them› Living together with them› Sharing a number of material goods› Being there when needed› Being prepared to listen

Being considered about the amount of time or resources to be devoted to the children

Page 14: Phillosophy of education

a number of different means can often be taken to achieve a particular end

there may be a wide divergence of opinion regarding the ends to be achieved in education and child-rearing.

Page 15: Phillosophy of education

Not everything can be brought into accord with our “nature”.

Page 16: Phillosophy of education

The acceptance of pluralism at the level of society cannot be simply duplicated at the family level.

It is possible to accept that different conceptions of the good life exist, this is a merely cognitive acceptance

Page 17: Phillosophy of education

To care for one’s children means to care for what they care for.

Page 18: Phillosophy of education
Page 19: Phillosophy of education

Children cannot be taught everything rationally, so that the parents have to prevent them from destroying their lives or their future as long as society places children in their charge› Parents apathy› To remain indifferently to everything

children do is to neglect them

Page 20: Phillosophy of education

as a relationship that people have sought themselves, in which they are prepared to invest much of their time, resources, and themselves, and that makes them proud of “what they have made” of their children and feel deep sorrow if their children cannot lead satisfactory lives.

Page 21: Phillosophy of education

There must be a presumption that many chosen ways of life (secular or religious) are sufficient moral value for it to be permissible for children to be brought up according to their values, customs, and traditions.

We enter the world as separate and equal beings and that the right to choose a way of life that is assumed by the parent cannot ultimately be denied the child, either by physical coercion or by indoctrination or the denial of access to education and wider knowledge

Page 22: Phillosophy of education

It is important that the believer should not only follow the religious precepts but should choose to do so voluntarily

If a way of life is truly good, any additional knowledge, speculation, or enquiry is bound to strengthen rather than undermine it

Page 23: Phillosophy of education

It becomes increasingly difficult for parents to envisage a precise for their offspring.

Nor is it any longer appropriate to regard their parental role as one in which they are obliged always to be right, as well as possessing absolute power and authority, though they may be as aware as ever that what they do for their children will make a significant difference to their life