Wire Cut, Wire EDM,Wire cut EDM,EDM Machines, Wire Cutting ...
Philip Harris University of Sussex (for the EDM Collaboration) The Neutron EDM Experiments at the...
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
3
Transcript of Philip Harris University of Sussex (for the EDM Collaboration) The Neutron EDM Experiments at the...
Philip HarrisUniversity of Sussex(for the EDM Collaboration)
The Neutron EDM Experimentsat the ILL
P. Harris
University of Sussex
Highlights
New (but preliminary) limit: |dn| < 3.1 x 10-26 e.cm
1. nEDM “Classic”
2. CryoEDMUnder development:
100x improved sensitivity
P. Harris
University of Sussex
Electric Dipole Moments
Separation between+,- charge centres
EDMs are P odd T odd
Complementary approachto study of CPv
E +
dn = dn s
P. Harris
University of Sussex
SM EDM predictions very small... ... so no SM background to worry about
Beyond SM predictions typ. 106
greater ... so EDMs are excellent probe of BSM
CPv SM parameterisation of CPv
inadequate to explain baryon asymmetry
Strong CP Problem: s < 10-10 rads
CP violation & the neutron EDM
P. Harris
University of Sussex
dq, dq ~ (loop factor) sin CP c
2
mq
Implications for SUSY
quark electric dipole moments
q q
gaugino
squark
quark color dipole moments
q q
g
gaugino
squark
CP phase from soft breaking naturally O(1)
scale of SUSY breaking naturally ~200 GeV
naturally ~
du,d, du,d ~ 31024 cm naturallyc
n and Hg experiments give du< 2 1025
dd< 5 1026
du< 3 1026
dd< 3 1026
c
c
~ 100 times less! > 2 TeV ? CP < 10-2 ?
P. Harris
University of Sussex
History
Factor 10every 8 yearson average
Now
CryoEDM
P. Harris
University of Sussex
Measurement principle
() – () = – 4 E d/ h
assuming B unchanged when E is reversed.
B0 E<Sz> = + h/2
<Sz> = - h/2
h(0) h() h()
B0 B0 E
Energy resolution of our detector:10-21 eV
Use NMR on ultracold neutrons in B, E fields.
P. Harris
University of Sussex
Apparatus
Neutronstoragechamber
HVfeedthru
B-fieldcoils
P. Harris
University of Sussex0 5 10 15 20 25
29.9260
29.9265
29.9270
29.9275
29.9280
29.9285
29.9290
29.9295
Neu
tron
res
onan
t fr
eque
ncy
(Hz)
Run duration (hours)
nEDM measurement Look for n freq changes correlated with changes in E
Electric Field
+-
P. Harris
University of Sussex0 5 10 15 20
7.7882
7.7884
7.7886
7.7888
7.7890
Run duration (hours)
Mer
cury
freq
uenc
y (H
z)
Mercury co-magnetometer
Compensates B drift...
P. Harris
University of Sussex0 5 10 15 20 25
29.9260
29.9265
29.9270
29.9275
29.9280
29.9285
29.9290
B = 10 -10 T
Raw neutron frequencyCorrected frequency
Pre
cess
ion
freq
uenc
y (H
z)
Run duration (hours)
nEDM measurement
29.9295
P. Harris
University of Sussex
Neutron EDM results (binned)
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100
ED
M (
10-2
5 e.c
m)
Current limitset here
Stat. limit now 1.54 x 10-26 e.cm
P. Harris
University of Sussex
Systematics Consider
Should have value 1 R is shifted by magnetic field
gradients Plot EDM vs measured R-1:
n
Hg
Hg
nR
P. Harris
University of Sussex
Systematics
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
-40 -20 0 20 40
R-1 (ppm)
ED
M (
10-2
5 e.c
m)
Magnetic field down
z
B
P. Harris
University of Sussex
Systematics
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
-10 0 10 20 30 40
R-1 (ppm)
ED
M (
10
-26 e
.cm
)
Magnetic field up
z
B
P. Harris
University of Sussex
Geometric phase
rBz
Br
and, from Special Relativity, extra motion-induced field
2
1
c
EvB
Two effects:
J.M. Pendlebury et al., PRA 70 032102 (2004)
P. Harris
University of Sussex
Geometric phase
Br
Br
Bnet
Bnet
Bv
Bv
Bv
Bnet
Bnet
... so particlesees additionalrotating field
Frequency shift E
Looks likean EDM
Bottle(top view)
P. Harris
University of Sussex
Results
R-1
EDM
0
B down
B up The answer?
Nearly...
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
-40 -20 0 20 40
R-1 (ppm)
ED
M (1
0-2
5 e
.cm
)
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
-10 0 10 20 30 40
R-1 (ppm)
EDM
(10
-26
e.c
m)
P. Harris
University of Sussex
Results
R-1
EDM
0
Small dipole/quadrupole fields can pull lines apart
& add GP shiftsB up
B down
P. Harris
University of Sussex
Results
R-1
EDM
0
Small dipole/quadrupole fields can pull lines apart
& add GP shiftsB up
B down
Measure and apply correction
...difficult!
P. Harris
University of Sussex
Error budgetStatistical 1.54E-26 e.cm
Dipole & quadrupole shifts 6E-27 e.cm
Enhanced GP dipole shifts ~4E-27 e.cm
(E x v)/c2 from translation 1E-27 e.cm
(E x v)/c2 from rotation 1E-27 e.cm
Light shift: direct 8E-28 e.cm
B fluctuations 7E-28 e.cm
E forces – distortion of bottle
4E-28 e.cm
Tangential leakage currents
1E-28 e.cm
AC B fields from HV ripple <1E-28 e.cm
Light shift: GP effects 8E-28 e.cm
P. Harris
University of Sussex
PRELIMINARY Results
New (preliminary) limit:|dn| < 3.1 x 10-26 e.cm (90% CL)
dn = (-0.31 1.54 1.00) x 10-26 e.cm
Preprint expected soon
P. Harris
University of Sussex
CryoEDM
100-fold improvement in sensitivity!
n = 8.9 Å; E = 1.03 meV
Landau-Feynman dispersion curve for 4He excitations
Dispersion curve for free neutrons
R. Golub and J.M. Pendlebury Phys. Lett. 53A (1975), Phys. Lett. 62A (1977)
•More neutrons•Higher E field•Better polarisation•Better NMR time
P. Harris
University of Sussex
CryoEDM overviewNeutron beam input
Transfer section
Cryogenic Ramsey chamber
P. Harris
University of Sussex
Cryogenic Ramsey chamber
Superfluid He
HV electrode
n storage cells
P. Harris
University of Sussex
CryoEDM
Turns onOctober 2006
P. Harris
University of Sussex
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
-10 0 10 20 30 40
R-1 (ppm)
EDM
(10
-26
e.c
m)
Conclusions
EDM “Classic”: new (preliminary) limit, factor 2 improvement
CryoEDM coming soon – 100x more sensitive
Watch this space!
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
-40 -20 0 20 40
R-1 (ppm)
ED
M (
10-2
5 e
.cm
)
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100
ED
M (
10-2
5 e.c
m)