Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

17
Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

Transcript of Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

Page 1: Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

Phased Array Feeds

John O’Sullivan

SKANZ 2012

CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

Page 2: Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

Why phased array feed

• The need for Field of View• Survey speed

• FoV 1/Collecting area 1/sensitivity for single collector

• Options• Many small collectors huge

correlator/imager cost• Small single pixel dishes• Aperture array

• Fewer small collectors with concentrators

• Rather than have separate feeds think aperture synthesis applied to focal plane!

• Preferred option depends on:• Cost tradeoffs – electronic vs steel

and fabrication costs• Performance eg efficiency,

calibration accuracy, dynamic range, ability to “tune out” spillover etc

Beamformer

Phased array feed

Correlator and further processing

Multiple beams

Page 3: Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

Some basic phased array feed physics

• The array must fully sample the incoming fields – no grating lobes• Collect all the incident energy• Necessary for interpolation between array ports – flat field• Necessary for removal unwanted spillover noise contribution• Correct for aberrations/distortions

• Array port beams overlap (similar amplitude different phase slope)• All array ports are fundamentally coupled to each other• Share power from source poor individual port gain compared to an

isolated antenna• Array is like interferometer and desired signals must come from dish –

transform of (u,v) visibility has a cutoff.• Spillover comes from beyond the dish and can be filtered out

Page 4: Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

Array and image beamforming

Post-correlator beamformed (c)

Other antennas

ArrayBeam-former

Array

Raw array ports (r)

Pre-correlator beamformed

(b)SynthesisBeamformImage

beamform

• Array beamformer must form max sensitivity beams (or else must measure cross correlations between ports!!!)

• Image beam forming to make flat field primary beam• Synthesis beamforming to make final maps

Page 5: Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

The flat composite primary beam field of view

CSIRO. SKANZ Conference, Feb 2012

ASKAP 188 port array at 1200 MHzCourtesy Rong-Yu Qiao

Based on full electromagnetic plus electronic model devel. By SJ Hay and myself

Page 6: Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

Musings on processing and calibration

• Basically we want the gain/phase/polarisation of the composite wide flat field at each point

• This must be a highly constrained, bandlimited function composed of known per telescope basis functions

• Have many measurements simultaneously• Multiple interferometers• Multiple overlapping port beams to form fewer beams• Multiple sources in any field to solve

• The resulting synthesis (ie dirty) beam varies (slowly) from point to point if we choose not to adjust for errors in real time

• The result may be a greater ability to use internal consistency for calibration than single field interferometers!

Page 7: Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

Array element options

• Many options – patches, dipoles, slots, horns, apertures• To first order very similar – minimum coupling is fundamental to any radiating

structure – some may be worse• Ultimately, the ability to match over required bandwidth determines the

sensitivity – depends on coupling!!• We initially chose the Checkerboard for ease of electromagnetic modeling and

manufacture

Clark et al, DARPA

8x9x2 Vivaldi element FPA5x4x2x2 Checkerboard FPA

Ivashina et al, Astron

Page 8: Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

ASKAP – Receiver Block Diagram

Receiver elements

LNA 700-1300 MHz

700-1800 MHz

Band selection

1000-1800 MHz

Mixer1BPF

Mixer2 Anti Alasing filterAmp

LO2=4430MHz(Low side LO)

LO1=5850-6650MHz(High side LO)

IF=570MHzBW=300MHz

IF=5GHzBW=300MHz

To ADCIF1 IF2

Antenna/LNA Sub-octave band selection

Conversion module

DigitalAttenuator

Gain control

RF Cable(20-25m)

Antenna PedestalFocus Package

700-1300 MHz

1000-1800 MHz

LO15850-6650 MHz

LO24430 MHz

570 MHz IFBW=300MHz

40 m

Page 9: Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

CSIRO. Asia Pacific Microwave Conference 5-8 December, 2011

ASKAP Phased Array Feed construction

Page 10: Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

ASKAP Low-noise amplifier

Input 1

Input 2

Output

• Design frequency range:0.7 – 1.8 GHz

• Design system impedance at input :

300 Ω (differential)• Low noise transistors:

Avago ATF 35143 • Two stages of gain

Configured as two independent amplifiers with a single (difference) output

• Gain: 28 dB

• Noise temperature:40 – 60 Kelvin (measured in a 300 Ω differential system impedance)

Page 11: Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

CSIRO. Asia Pacific Microwave Conference 5-8 December, 2011

ASKAP Receiver Electronics

Page 12: Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

CSIRO. Asia Pacific Microwave Conference 5-8 December, 2011

June 2011: First results –aperture array

• Ground-based aperture array measurements• Y-factor measured with Cold sky and Hot load + all correlations

Page 13: Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.80

50

100

150

200

Frequency (GHz)

Noi

se T

empe

ratu

re (K

)

Approximate Beamformed Aperture Array Receiver Temperature Trx

295/(y-1)

Not Corrected for Sky BrightnessBeamformed on Radiated Noise at Boresight

ASKAP1 14-Jun-11ASKAP1 16-Jun-115x4 (skunkworks)Single LNA matched to 300

June 2011: First results – aperture array

• Boresight beamformed noise contribution from the PAF < 50 Kelvin (0.75 - 1.2 GHz)

• This is consistent with best expected performance of the array

• Noise increases significantly above 1.2 GHz

• Indicating that the co-optimis-ation needs to be improved in this part of the band.

• Design enhancement is currently nearing test

• So that the receiver noise performance will approach 50 Kelvin across the <0.7 GHz to 1.8 GHz ASKAP band.

Sensitivity matching conditions: Hay, IJMOT Vol.5, No.6, 2010 and ICEAA 2010.Measurement: unpublished

Ground-based aperture array measurements

Page 14: Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

Matching LNA to array

• Measured LNA optimum noise match source load vs active impedance of modelled array (current)

• Array has active impedance which must be equal to the optimum for the LNA to achieve noise near the best the LNA can achieve

• Next version (to be tested shortly) will be much better!

Page 15: Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

CSIRO. Asia Pacific Microwave Conference 5-8 December, 2011

CSIRO. ASKAP PAF development update July 12, 2011

June 2011: ASKAP PAF installed on Parkes Testbed

Page 16: Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

1.25 1.3 1.35 1.4 1.45 1.50

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Frequency (GHz)

Tsy

s/ (

K)

Beamformed System Temperature on EfficiencyASKAP MkI Prototype PAF - MaxSNR Boresight Beam

parkes_20110921\f_1934-638

XXYY

Phased array feed – Parkes 12m

Page 17: Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,

CSIRO. Asia Pacific Microwave Conference 5-8 December, 2011

CSIRO. ASKAP PAF development update July 12, 2011

October 2011: ASKAP PAF installed in Boolardy