petrolem geology geochemistry

download petrolem geology geochemistry

of 29

Transcript of petrolem geology geochemistry

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    1/29

    G EOCH EM 1C A L CONSU LTANTS

    COMPANY INCORPORATED IN U.K. NO. 1509402VAT REGISTRATION NO. 354021394

    DIRECTORS: T. DORANV.L. ROVEDAS P LOWE

    D.R. WHITBREAD

    UNIT 14 PARAMOUNT INDUSTRIAL ESTATESANDOWN ROAD WATFORD WD24XA.TEL: 43196 TELEX: 8812973

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    2/29

    P A L E O C H E M

    Contents.

    Page No,

    Summary

    1. Introduction ^

    2. Samples and Techniques 1 - 3

    3. Results and Discussion 3 - 1 2

    (a) Maturity

    (b) Source Potential

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    3/29

    PA L E O C H E M

    Summary

    Twenty-two potentially rich sediment sidewall coresand three sandstone sidewall cores, containing oil shows

    were used to complete a detailed geochemical source rockand reservoired hydrocarbons study. Maturity estimations

    using Vitrinite Reflectance measurements and Spore Colourationratings, suggested all the sediments examined to be immaturefor any hydrocarbon generation.

    The hydrocarbon potential of the 22 sediment sampleswere found to be extremely varied, but good source sectionswere identified in the Kimmeridgian and Early Jurassic sections

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    4/29

    - 1 -

    PALEOCHEM

    1. Introduction

    A detailed geochemical study was completed ontwenty-five sidewall cores from the depth interval1835 - 3447.5 m of Well: 6507/12-2, Offshore Norway.Three of the sidewall cores contained oil shows andwere treated differently from the other twenty-two.The section examined extended from the Late Cretaceousto Late Triassic. The main emphasis of the study wasplaced on establishing reliable geochemical parameters

    for use as well-to-well correlation parameters, inaddition to the more traditional tools available tothe hydrocarbon explorationist.

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    5/29

    -2-

    P A L E O C H E M

    any trace of drilling mud and then air dried under

    controlled conditions at 40C. It was noted that themajority of the samples smelled strongly of hydrocarbons.(

    Samples for Visual Kerogen Description were treatedwith mineral acid. The remaining debris was sedimented

    onto a microscope slide and examined using a transmittedlight microscope. The results of the Visual Kerogendescriptions and assessments of Spore Colouration areshown in Table 1. The range of the Spore Colouration isfrom 1 - 7 and the colour taken as representing the onsetof liquid hydrocarbon generation is 3/4.

    Samples for Total Organic Carbon measurements werefinely ground and sieved to achieve homogeneity then

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    6/29

    -3-

    PALEOCHEM

    Ground Samples from two cores at 1874 and 1875 milsed for Soluble Extract Studies were extracted withgeochemical grade dichloromethane, using a high velocityliquid mixer. Excess solvent was removed by evaporation

    and the remaining extracts were separated on activatedsilica/ to provide saturate alkane and aromatic fractionsfor gas chromatographic analysis. The saturate alkane

    fractions were examined by quartz capillary gas chromatography

    using a Carlo Erba 2151 gas chromatograph with Grob-type

    splitless injector system. The results of these measurementsare represented in Table 4. The saturate alkane fractionswere then examined by CGCMS using a modified Finnigan 9500with Grob-type injector. The aromatic fractions were alsoexamined by CGCMS, as above.

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    7/29

    4

    PA L E O C H E M

    None of the spore colours shown in Table 1 aregreater than 2 and the highest reflectivity value seen

    * ' > :- * - ' . , - . - C . ;'U*' ' t - ; in sediments from the Late Trias was 0.47%. No sporefluorescence colours were available for supporting theimmature reflectivity values and spore colour ratings/but the sterane distributions shown in Fig.1 from the

    Kimmeridgian sediment at 1873 m are typical of an immaturesediment extract.

    (b) Source Potential

    (i) Hydrocarbon Potential

    Samples having total organic carbon values below

    0.5% are generally regarded as containing insufficient

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    8/29

    -5-

    The first peak (PI) is often considered as representative

    of the quantity of free hydrocarbons that were present in the

    sediment at the time of sampling. The second peak (P2) is

    considered to be representative of the quantity of hydrocarbonspresent in the sediment and yet to be generated. The P2 peak

    is produced by conversion of the Kerogen in the rock sampleby thermal cracking in the instrument. This is generally

    considered to be a reasonable estimate of the amount ofhydrocarbons, which could theoretically be generated by

    complete conversion of the Kerogen in sediments under

    natural conditions throughout their geological lifetime.

    Both the PI and P2 yields are expressed in Kg./tonne.

    Comparison of pyrolysis data with conventional

    h i l d id i l i

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    9/29

    -6-

    measurements and Screening Pyrolysis. It was noted

    that these sediments, similar to those from the Late

    Cretaceous, had significant quantities of in situhydrocarbons (PI), in relation to the amount of Kerogen

    breakdown products (P2). It is unfortunate, but during

    conventional pyrolysis some of the PI can be eluted withthe P2 fraction (5). It is Paleochem practise to extractsamples, where the PI is above a threshold value of 10%

    of the P2 value and to repeat the measurement of P2 a f ter_extraction, to obtain a more accurate measure of hydrocarbonpotential.

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    10/29

    -7-

    significantly by extraction (Table 3) and the potentialmeasured on the unextracted sample was over optimistic.

    There was insufficient sediment available from the1889 m sidewall core to complete TOG measurements, butScreening Pyrolysis demonstrated this sediment to haveonly poor hydrocarbon potential. The one sediment examinedfrom the Late/Middle Jurassic had a moderate TOG value of1.17%, but only a poor pyrolysis yield of only 0.3 Kg./tonne.This discrepancy in hydrocarbon potential ratings is thought

    to be due to the presence of significant quantities of re-

    worked material and/or inertinite in these sediments, whichwe would expect to have been evident during the Vitrinite

    Reflectance Studies.

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    11/29

    -8-

    The sidewall cores supplied were not spread evenly overstratigraphic intervals. It is suggested that the inter-pretation of the trends could be improved substantially bythe examination of further cores or cuttings/ filling inthe missing intervals.

    '' . '

    (ii) Hydrocarbon Type

    Hydrocarbon typing using Visual Kerogen Descriptionsshowed a wide variation in both the type and quantity ofplant debris present in the sediments examined (Table 1).These variations suggested the likely hydrocarbon products

    from the organic rich intervals in the Jurassic section ofthis well, to be varying proportions of both gas and liquids.Soluble Extract Studies completed on sediments from the

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    12/29

    -9-

    I PALEQCHEM

    and typical of a diesel fuel distribution. This diesel-likerange of hydrocarbons was also observed in the n-alkane dis-tributions of the reservoir sandstones at 3062, 3080.5 and3143 m as illustrated below.

    ' IX t^c -,j it ^ ^ - ^ . - , . < ; - . . . ; . .

    6507/12-2.306

    JV jV

    2m

    J

    17

    A

    u " j ' 'T ^ r '

    A A ^ ^iLLi i i^_ .... ^ ,

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    13/29

    -10-

    PALEOCHEM

    6507/12-2,1875mCP2 P E A K )

    6507/12-2,1875m(PI P E A K )

    L U B R I C AT I N G OIL

    BOILING POINT DISTRIBUTION

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    14/29

    -11-

    PALEOCHEM

    GASES

    G S O L I N E

    KEROSENE DIESEL

    H E V Y

    GAS

    O I L

    s

    L U B R I C T I N G

    OIL

    G S E S

    G S O L I N E

    KEROSENE DIESEL

    H E V Y

    GAS

    OIL

    L U B R I C T I N G

    O I L

    2235

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    15/29

    -12-

    PA L E O C H E M

    (c) Sediment/Oil Shows Correlation ' * -

    T V ; i 'A sediment to oil show correlation study was completed

    by CGCMS examination of the extracts from the two Kimmeridgiansediments (1873 and 1875 m) and oil shows from the reservoir

    sandstones (3062, 3080.5 and 3143 m). The sediment from 1873was considered to be the least affected by hydrocarbon con-tamination, judged by Screening Pyrolysis measurements andwas therefore used in the following comparison. The extractfrom the reservoir sandstone at 3062 m was also chosen forcomparison, as it was the largest extract obtained (Table 4).

    Detailed comparison was made between the sterane and

    hopane distributions, together with the distributions of the

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    16/29

    PA L E O C H E M

    References

    1. Dow W.G. J. Geochem Expl. 1 _ , pp 79 (1977).

    2. Ronov A.B. Geochemistry No.5., pp.510(1958) .

    3. Hunt J.M. The Origin of PetroleumCarbonate Rocks .Elsevier Ch.7 (1967).

    Clementz D.M. ,Demaison G. J.,Daly A.R.

    OTC (1979) page 465.

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    17/29

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    18/29

    Well: 6507/12-2

    VISUAL KEROGEN DATA

    Depth Cuticle Brownm Wood

    3305 Trace

    3360 Trace

    3447.5 Trace

    Black Wood Amorphous& Inertinite

    Trace

    Trace

    Trace

    PredominantSource Type

    None

    None

    None

    ColourMaturationRating

    2

    Barren

    2

    Table 1 - continued.

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    19/29

    PALEOCHEM

    Well: 6507/12-2

    General Well Data

    Sample Type Stratigraphy(by

    Paleoservi ces)

    SWC Late Cretaceous

    SWC Late Cretaceous

    SWC Kimmeridgian

    SWC i ' Ki mme r dgi an

    Depthm.

    1835

    1865

    1873

    1875

    Lithology

    Grey Claystone

    Grey Claystone

    Dark GreymicaceousSiltstone

    Dark GreymicaceousSiltstone

    Total OCarbon(TOC) %

    1.

    0.8

    9.3

    5.7

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    20/29

    1 PALEOCHEM -

    Well: 6507/12-2

    General

    Sample Type Stratigraphy(by

    Paleoservices)

    swc Late Triassic

    SWC Late Triassic

    SWC Late Triassic

    SWC Late Triassic

    SWC Late Triassic

    SWC Late Triassic

    Well Data

    Depthm.

    3 1 7 5

    3280

    3305

    3320

    3360

    3378

    Lithology

    Red ClaystoneRed Claystone(+Evaporite?)

    Grey Claystone

    Red Claystone

    Pale GreyClaystone

    White Sand-stone (+Rust?)

    Total OrganicCarbon Cont(TOC) w

    0.20

    0.15

    0.15

    0.14

    0.19

    005

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    21/29

    PALEOCHEM

    Well: 6507/12-2

    Pyrolvsis Data

    Depthm.

    1835

    1865

    1873

    1875

    1873*

    1875*

    1889

    Yield (Kg/tonne)PI Peak

    0.3

    0.2 (0.1 Rpt)

    2.3

    2.4

    0.6

    0.7

    0.2 (0.2 Rpt)

    P2 Peak

    1.10.4 (0.4

    10.8

    10.3

    7.6

    6.9

    0.7 (0.6

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    22/29

    Well No: 6507/12-2

    SOLUBLE EXTRACT DATA

    Depthm.

    1873

    1875

    3062

    3080.5 , , j

    3143

    Total SolubleExtract (TSE) wt.

    0.199

    0.217

    0.706

    0.607

    0.170

    Saturate AlkaneContent (SAC) of

    TSE ( :/;,r

    47.0f

    46.8 ?

    28.9 / ?

    41.1 / > -

    15.7 - 6 , t , 3

    Aromat i csContent (AC) of TSE

    0.2

    1.2

    15.3

    20.7

    26.1

    Carbon PrefereceIndex (CPI)

    N P - V '

    NP /

    NP

    NP

    NP -- - > .

    NP - CPI values could not be calculated due to short range of saturate alkanes presentin samples.

    Table 4.

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    23/29

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    24/29

    Sediment Extract 1873

    I - . m M / i e / ic - - ,

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    25/29

    P A L E O C H E M

    DI

    Sediment Extract 1 8 7 3

    V?

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    26/29

    Sediment Extract 1873

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    27/29

    PALEOCHEM

    Sediment Extract 1873

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    28/29

    PLEGG H r: M

    Sediment Extract

    1873 m

  • 8/10/2019 petrolem geology geochemistry

    29/29