Petition Filed Against SAFMA in Supreme Court
Transcript of Petition Filed Against SAFMA in Supreme Court
Page 1 of 13
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD (Constitutional Jurisdiction)
Constitutional Petition No._______/2012
Syed Zaid Zaman Hamid, Founding President of an Internationally
Recognized Threat Analysis Consultancy and Defence Think Tank,
“Brass Tackss”, House No.686, Ammar Shaheed Road, opposite
Askari-II Flats, Chaklala Scheme-III, Rawalpindi Cantt.
…..Petitioner
VERSUS
1. Ministry of Information, Government of Pakistan through its
Secretary, Pak Secretariat, Islamabad.
2. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Government of Pakistan, through its
Secretary, Constitutional Avenue, Islamabad.
3. Chairman, Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority
(PEMRA), Evacuee Property Building, Jinnah Avenue, Blue Area,
Islamabad.
4. Ministry of Law, Government of Pakistan through its Secretary,
Pak Secretariat, Islamabad.
5. Director General, ISI, ISI Headquarters, Islamabad.
6. South Asian Free Media Association (SAFMA), Lahore Office, 177-
A, Shadman-II, Lahore, Pakistan.
Islamabad Office, House No.4-B, Street No.62, F-7/4, Islamabad.
7. Imtiaz Alam, Daily News, Executive Director - Free Media
Foundation / SAFMA
8. Sirmed Manzoor, Founder Member of SAFMA
9. Najam Sethi, Analyst “Aapis Ki Baat” at Geo TV & SAMA
10. Beena Sarwar, Founder Member of SAFMA
11. Nusrat Javed, Founder Member of SAFMA
Page 2 of 13
12. Khalid Ahmed, Director SAFMA
13. Marvi Sirmed, SAFMA Supporter
14. Ali Chishti, Daily Times & Friday Times
15. Hamid Mir, Host program Capital Talk at Geo News, Islamabad
16. Hassan Nisaar – Analyst / Host at Geo
17. Aasma Jahangir, Advocate of Supreme Court of Pakistan, C/O
Supreme Court Bar Association, Supreme Court building
Islamabad. Supporter of SAFMA and Aman Ki Aasha
(Respondent No.6 to 17 are the Founder Members of SAFMA,
members Board of Governors (BoG), SAFMA and Supporters /
Promoters of SAFMA and Aman Ki Asha.
SAFMA Lahore Office, 177-A, Shadman-II, Lahore, Pakistan.
SAFMA Islamabad Office, House No.4-B, Street No.62, F-7/4,
Islamabad.
…Respondents
PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 184 (3) OF THE CONSTITUTION
OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN,1973
Humbly Sheweth:
1. That the following principles and questions of law of public
importance needs determination by this honorable Court, in order to
adjudicate with regard to instant constitutional petition:-
a. Whether it is not a fact that Supreme Court of Pakistan under
Article 184 (3) of the constitution has original jurisdiction, if it
consider that a question of public importance with reference to the
enforcement of any of fundamental rights conferred by chapter 1
of part 2 is involved and has the power to make any order under
Article 199 of the Constitution?
Page 3 of 13
b. Whether it is not a fact that constitutional jurisdiction of superior
courts can be invoked by a person as Pro Bona Publico, hence,
petitioner is litigating in public interest for public good or for the
welfare of the general public. Petitioner in public interest
litigation can agitate relief on his behalf and also on behalf of the
general public, against various public functionaries on their
failure to perform their duties relating to welfare to public at
large, which they are bound to provide under the law? (PLD 2004,
SC, 482)
c. Whether it is not a fact that the term “in the interest of the glory of
Islam” as mentioned in Article 19 of the constitution, which deals
with the freedom of speech and expression, which indicates that
legislature has to impose certain restriction in the interest of the
glory of Islam?
d. Whether it is not a fact that legislature can lawfully impose
restrictions upon the freedom of speech and expression on the
following grounds, as described in the Article 19 i.e. in the
interest of :-
Glory of Islam,
Integrity, security or defence of Pakistan or any part
thereof,
Friendly relations with foreign states
Public order, decency or morality or in relation to
contempt of court, and finally
Commission or incitement to an offence.
e. Weather it is not a fact that the constitution repeatedly mentions
about the integrity, security and defence of Pakistan in articles 10
(4), 10 (7) proviso, 62 (G) and 63 (G), that speaks volume that
how much significance / importance it gives to the fore mentioned
concepts?
f. Weather it is not a fact that bare reading of articles 2, 2A, 62
(D,E,F and G) 203C, 227, 228, 229 and 230 are indicative of the
reality that they are reflection of “Ideology of Pakistan”, based on
two nations theory and glory of Islam?
Page 4 of 13
g. Weather it is not the fact that if someone violets freedom of
speech and expressions and collaborate through unconstitutional
means such as violating reasonable restriction imposed by the
constitution (Article 19) and Law (PEMRA ordinance) in the
interest of glory of Islam or the integrity, security or defence of
Pakistan, either subvert or conspire to subvert the constitution,
thus he commits High Treason punishable under article 6 of the
constitution, read with High Treason (Punishment Act), 1973.
h. Whether it is not a fact that courts have upheld the authority of
statute passed by legislature in order to prevent the over throwing
of government by violent means i.e. act of anarchy, statute
making crimes the advocacy of insubordination in the armed
forces, seditious acts, statute requiring registration of organization
deem to be subversive and regulating their acts, the laws relating
to defence and security of the country, regulatory laws regarding
media both electronic and print and contempt of court laws to
regulate a peaceful and orderly proceedings of the court, thus the
said laws are not violative of Article 17, 18 and 19 of the
Constitution?
i. Whether it is not a fact that after 8th
Amendment which was
inserted in the body of the constitution under President order
No.14 of 1985, Article 2 - A was added and objective resolution
was made substantive part of the constitution, thus, it became the
grund norm or touch stone of the constitution?
j. Whether it is not affect that some of the relevant terms and
condition for issuance of a license by PEMRA U/s 20 of PEMRA
Ordinance, 2002 are as under, which are relevant in the context
of present petition:-
i. To ensure preservation of sovereignty, security and
integrity of Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
ii. To ensure preservation of national culture, social and
religious values and the principles of public policy as
Page 5 of 13
enshrined in the Constitution of Islamic Republic of
Pakistan.
iii. To ensure that all programmes and advertisement do not
contain or encourage violence, terrorism, retrial, ethnic or
religious discrimination, sectarianism, extremism,
militancy, hatred, pornography, obscenity, vulgarity or
other material offensive to commonly accepted standards
of disunity.
iv. To ensure that no anchorperson, no moderator or host
propagate any opinion or act in any manner prejudicial to
the ideology of Pakistan or sovereignty, integrity, security
of Pakistan.
v. Not broadcast anything which defames or bring into
ridicule the head of state, or member of the armed forces,
or executive, legislative or judicial organs of the state.
k. Whether it is not a fact that PEMRA by a written order giving
reason is authorized to prohibit any broadcast media or
distribution service operator or owner from broadcasting or
rebroadcasting or distributing any programme or advertisement if
it is of the opinion that such particular programme or
advertisement is against the ideology of Pakistan or is likely to
create hatred among the people or is prejudicial to the
maintenance of law and order or is likely to disturb public peace
and tranquility or in danger national security or is pornographic,
obscene or vulgar or is offensive to the commonly accepted
standards of decency?
l. Whether it is not a fact that Pakistan is in a state of existential
war, under attack from multiple axis. The objective of this war is
to balkanize the country on the pattern of Yugoslavia?
m. Whether it is not a fact that to achieve this sinister end, enemies
have deployed multiple war strategies against the state and the
people of Pakistan?
Page 6 of 13
n. Whether it is not a fact that the war to balkanize nations without
directly getting involved in high intensity wars. Yugoslavia was
broken down in just 3 years through a massive 4 generation war.
Today, the entire Middle East (Yemen, Egypt, Libya and now
Syria) is being subjected to this kind of warfare for the 21st
century. Pakistan is under this war for the least 10 years now?
o. Whether it is not a fact that a massive high intensity war within
the country between various insurgents groups, separatists,
terrorism, bombings, ethnic cleansing, inter-provincial disputes,
water wars etc, an economic collapse, financial corruption, bad
governance and nepotism and clash between the state organs to
stall the functions of the state. Creating artificial crisis of power,
Gas electricity, energy and social services to facilitate national
disintegration and collapse, information and propaganda war to
spread despondency, hopelessness, frustration, anger, rage and to
dilute the ideology which unites the nation and covering the
hostile acts of the enemies through media and propaganda
campaigns. All these aforementioned strategies are being evolved,
to disintegrate Pakistan from within?
p. Whether it is not a fact that Pakistan is facing an existential war
for its survival today, because of treacherous role of some
elements within Pakistani media and especially the group called
SAFMA working under the umbrella of Free Media foundation?
q. Whether it is not a fact that a Massive information and
propaganda war is being led and waged by SAFMA and their like
minded so called analysts, journalists and anchor persons -- is part
of the Fourth Generation War (4GW), Af-Pak and Cold Start War
Doctrines to soften the state and its ideology and is being waged
against Pakistan to assure the collapse of the state, ideology,
national unity, Islam and the national security. It is clear that a
Page 7 of 13
massive amount of resources have been pumped into this sinister
campaign to implode and destroy the state form within, using the
national media in a dubious manner?
r. Whether it is not a fact that the objective of information and
media war is to dilute Islamic ideology and Pakistan. Present
Pakistan as a secular state, Quaid-e-Azam as a secular and liberal
leader, remove Iqbal from intellectual and academic discourse,
humiliate Iqbal to lower his worth, attack Two Nation Theory
and prove that Pakistan should be more closer to Hindus than
Muslim world, attack the Islamic Clauses of the constitution,
attack the Objective resolution and spread Hindu media,
mythology and ideology into Pakistan through all media,
advertisements and programs under the brand name of Free media
and “Aman Ki Asha”?
s. Whether it is not a fact that attacking the Armed forces of
Pakistan and ISI is to demoralize the security organs and to create
a gulf between the Nation and its Armed forces?
t. Whether it is not a fact that SAFMA is creating Moral and social
anarchy through filthy Indian media, secular or Hindu ideology,
vulgarity, Hindu culture is spreading immoral values repugnant of
Islamic and local cultures?
u. Any other law point which may be taken up at the time of
arguments?
2. That the following facts are relevant in order to determine and decide
questions of law and public importance, as enumerated in para 1 of
instant petition, by this august Court:-
a. That the petitioner is an internationally known security, defence
and threat perception analyst and runs a Think Tank called Brass
Tacks, whose defence and threat perception studies are widely
circulated, read and acknowledged by friendly countries national
Page 8 of 13
and international media and national security organization like
Pak-Arm forces and Intelligence agencies. Jordanian Strategic
Study Institute declared him in 2010 and 2011 as one of the most
influential five hundred Muslims living in the World today. His
Think Tank on monthly basis publishes a magazine called
Monthly Security Review Brass Tacks. The CDs containing his
television interviews and his talks to various institutions are
widely distributed and listen to by all the segment of the society,
including the armed forces. He has very actively worked in
Afghan Jehad from 1986 to 1992 and wrote an internationally
known book titled as “From Indus to Oxus”, which are his
memoirs, experiences, observations and travels in the melting pot
of history. In short he is a widely acclaimed international
intellectual, scholar and defence analyst.
b. That journalist, analysts, anchor person, moderatos, supporters
and promoters like Imtiaz Alam, Sirmed Manzoor, Najam Sethi,
Beena Sarwar, Nusrat Javid, Khalid Ahmed, Hasan Nisaar,
Hamid Mir, Ali Chishti, Marvi Sirmed, Aasma Jahangir etc, have
done great damage to the ideology of Pakistan, Sprit of objective
resolution and Islamic clauses of the constitution they have tried
to project Quaid-e-Azam as a secular leader, deliberately lowered
the image of Allama Iqbal, aggressively attacked the fair image of
armed forces of the country and ISI, propagated inter-provisional
disharmony and tug of war and sectarian hatred, thus deliberately
created despondency and disunity among the toiling teeming
millions people of Pakistan in every nook and corner of the
country. Their statements, write-ups and talk shows are attached
herewith this petition as ready reference.
c. That Pakistan is an ideological Islamic State created on the basis
of Two Nations Theory to be made a homeland for Muslims of
the sub-continent to live and carve their lives according to Quran
and Sunnah and teachings of Islam individually and collectively.
Five millions Muslims sacrificed their lives and Over 10 million
Page 9 of 13
left their homes and hearth to migrate to Pakistan to create this
sacred Islamic land as an Islamic State for Muslims. Quaid e
Azam wished Pakistan to be an Islamic State and Allama Iqbal is
the visionary philosopher and the spiritual mentor of Quaid-e-
Azam, who envisioned this sacred land for Islam and Muslims, as
a launching pad, to establish common wealth of the Muslims
Nations.
d. That the basis of Pakistan is neither language nationalism, nor
cultural nationalism nor geographical nationalism. Had it been so,
then Punjab should not have been divided and then Bengal should
not have been divided, because in Punjab Barkat Ali, Barkat
Singh and Barkat Ram spoke the same language Punjabi, they had
same culture, Bulley Shah, Waris Shah and Jugni and they lived
in the same geographical contiguity, yet Punjab and Bengal were
divided. That mean that basis of Pakistan is neither language nor
cultural nor geographical but in fact basis of Pakistan was Muslim
Nationalism, based on Islamic Ideology.
e. That our elders passed the Objectives Resolution on 07-03-1949
to set the ideological bearings of this state and to make the future
constitution and Municipal laws according to the Quran and
Sunnah. Objectives Resolution is now part of our constitution as
Article 2-A and was added through 8th
Amendment in 1985.
There are Islamic provisions in our constitution which make it
clear that no law in Pakistan can be made in violation to the
Quran and Sunnah, keeping in view the provision of Article 227
and Articles 62, 63 give clear direction for electing of members of
Parliament and Rulers that all non-practicing “Muslims” cannot
even enter in the Parliament or state offices.
f. That it is against Pakistan’s constitution and is a crime in Pakistan
penal code as well as in PEMRA Act and Rules to attack and
distort the Islamic ideology of Pakistan, as envisaged in Article.
2A of the constitution. Attacking the Two Nation Theory,
Page 10 of 13
Objectives Resolution and Islamic character of the state and
attacking and humiliating the armed forces of Pakistan and its
founding father. Attacking internationally prestigious intelligence
agency such as ISI and Armed Forces is an offence severely
punishable under the Panel laws of the country.
g. That our enemies, especially India, have always been waging a
war against the state of Pakistan. In 1971, they attacked East
Pakistan, supported insurgencies, spread lies and disinformation
and worked hard to dilute the Two Nation Theory by promoting
provincial hatred resulting in breakup of Pakistan. Indira Gandhi
took pride not in the military victory but in the fact that they had
dismantled the Ideological Pillar of Pakistan, “The Two Nation
Theory”. She said in her victory celebrations that “today, the
Indians have drowned the Two Nation Theory into the Bay of
Bengal”. Our enemies know that if the ideology of Pakistan is
destroyed, the entire State of Pakistan will then automatically
crumbles and cease to exist. Hence, the ideology, Islamic
Character and Islamic Clauses of the constitution of Pakistan are
always most vehemently attacked by the Indians and their paid
agents, with a view to destabilize the state of Pakistan.
h. That today, Pakistan is passing through the most critical phase of
its history after the 1971 crises. The country is already in a state
of war and Pak army and the people have already given a sacrifice
of over 100,000 Shudah and wounded in this American imposed
war. The American presence in Afghanistan has allowed the
Indians to support multiple insurgencies and wars in Pakistani
Tribal areas, Baluchistan and in Urban areas. Pakistan army and
government are on record saying that these insurgencies are
getting covert and clandestine support from foreign powers and
Zino-Indian nexus. U.S. government is preparing grounds for an
intervention in Baluchistan and great national security threats like
“Memo Scandal” have come to surface which has created a grave
and unprecedented clash within the state organs weakening the
Page 11 of 13
state tremendously from within. Pakistan is being softened up for
an invasion under US led Af-Pak and Indian led Cold Start
Military Doctrine and a 4th Generation War is already upon
Pakistan where urban gangs, economic collapse and insurgencies
are tearing the very fabric of the state and the nation, beyond
repair.
i. That in these most critical and dangerous times of National Crisis
and War, South Asian Free Media Association (SAFMA) and its
supporters / sympathizers are acting as the “fifth column of the
enemies” within Pakistan media. SAFMA are “ideological
terrorists” whose prime responsibility is to attack and destroy the
Two Nation Theory, Islamic Ideology, Islamic Provisions of the
constitution and Objectives Resolution on behalf of the Indian
intelligence and its establishment and to “Hinduize” Pakistani
society under its “soft war” through media and information
warfare. SAFMA is packed with so called secular journalists, who
are projecting the father of the nation as a secular leader, saying
publically that there is no such thing as ideology of Pakistan or
Pakistan Resolution and aggressively attacking the Two Nation
Theory. SAFMA connected media is destroying Pakistan from
within through massive information warfare, attacking the army
and the ISI and spreading the hatred between provinces and thus
inculcating despondency among the people in every look and
corner of the country, through powerful media.
j. That SAFMA is also responsible for promoting the political,
diplomatic and security agenda of Indian government in Pakistan.
Particularly, the stance of SAFMA on all security issues to
promote and extend the agenda of Indian government. On
Kashmir, Baluchistan, terrorism, Pakistan army and ISI and
“secularism” just to name the few where SAFMA’s stance
severely damages Pakistan, Pakistan Army and the national
security apparatus and defence interests.
Page 12 of 13
k. That none of the actions of SAFMA have ever created crisis for
the Indian government, RAW or the Indian Army, although it
operates on both side of the international border. All those
incidents and events where Muslims are being suppressed or
Indian State or Hindu extremists are involved in terrorism in
Pakistan, SAFMA remains silent or takes the side of the Indian
Government, on subject such as, Kashmir, TTP and BLA
violence, Samjotha Express, Mumbai attacks, to name a few.
l. That many of the most senior and patriotic analysts of Pakistan
have raised serious objections over the objectives and agenda of
SAFMA in Pakistan. Pakistan’s national security apparatus treat
SAFMA as hostile enemy entity and SAFMA have themselves
acknowledged that ISI raids their houses and call them enemies.
m. That SAFMA was established in 2000 about twelve years ago, but
till 2010 had not made their funding financial reports and audit
report public despite spending billions in massive programe,
lavish parties and cross border visits with hundreds of people
traveling and lodging in luxury hotels. It should be noted that
SAFMA is a covert operation of Indian establishment and Raw
and such operations rarely have any audited bank statements,
hence depend upon secret funding, briefcases and envelopes. The
lavish SAFMA lifestyles and spending are serious circumstantial
evidence to their secret foreign founding.
n. That SAFMA is security threat organization which has exploited
the moment to wage an information and media war against the
Islamic Republic of Pakistan. According to the national laws,
Constitution and the PEMRA Rules, SAFMA and its members
should be tried for High treason against the state, for attacking
and violating the Islamic character of the nation and for extending
the agenda of a hostile state against Pakistan’s national security
interest and armed forces, and must be banned from operating in
Pakistan under any new name, either in individual capacity or as
Page 13 of 13
an organization, and severe punishment should be awarded to the
SAFMA and its members for acting as fifth calumets against the
Islamic Republic of Pakistan, in these times of war, unrest and
regional insecurity.
o. That the petitioner reserves his right to submit additional
documents / evidence if and when so required.
In the light of what has been stated above it is most humbly prayed
that in the larger interest of integrity, solidarity and unity of
Pakistan, Government of Pakistan through its relevant ministries
mentioned above in the memo of the parties and Chairman PEMRA
may graciously be directed to take cognizance of their
(Respondents No. 6 to 17) nefarious activities as detailed above, in
the body of instant petition, and take action against the respondents
No 6 to 17, in accordance with section 27 of Pakistan Electronic
Media Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002, Prohibiting their
broadcast on electronic Media as a guest, anchor Person or
moderator. It is further prayed that since respondents No. 6 to 17
are guilty of subversion of the Constitution therefore, Government
of Pakistan may be directed to the lodge a FIR against them
(Respondents No. 6 to 17) so, that they are tried / prosecuted and
punished in accordance with High Treason (Punishment) ACT
1973, and under Article 6 of the Constitution.
Any other relief, which this August Court may deem appropriate,
keeps in view the circumstances of instant petition.
DRAWN BY
Sahibzada Ahmad Raza Khan Qasuri Senior Advocate,
Supreme Court of Pakistan
64, Gomal Road, E-7, Islamabad
Tele No:051-2654761-2
Cell #: 0300-9558217
FILED BY
Ejaz Muhammad Khan Advocate-on-Record
Supreme Court of Pakistan