Petition Doc

7/30/2019 Petition Doc

1/14

Supermarket Dishonesty Petition Address

https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/supermarket-dishonesty

I am making this petition partly

because of the following:

1) The company t ol d me t hat t he i ssues I r ai sed wer edi r ect ed t o t he rel evant peopl e and addr essed but t heyhave not t ol d me - despi t e my request t hat t hey t el l me -whi ch of t he i ssues I r ai sed wer e addr essed.

2) The company mai nt ai n t hat t he cor r ect pr ocedur es weref ol l owed yet do not want t o t el l me i f I was t r eat edf ai r l y and consi st ent l y. Even when t hey say t he cor r ectpr ocedur es wer e f ol l owed, t hey al ways ar gue t hat t hemeet i ng wasn' t a di sci pl i nar y meet i ng - despi t e t hedi smi ssal l et t er st at i ng t hat i t was. [ My di smi ssal wasnot summary nor was t here gr oss mi sconduct . ]

I cannot accept such nonsense f r om t he company,especi al l y when I see t he wor ds quot ed bel ow f r om soci alnet wor ki ng websi t es by t he HR manager i n Tr ai ni ng. Irecall that I was accused of lying and that I did not

have a relevant signed contract.

I have been advi sed t hat a per son can t ake a case ofbr each of cont r act t o t he count y cour t s up t o 6 year sf r om t he t i me t he br each occur r ed. So t her e i s st i l l t i mef or me t o t ake t he mat t er t o a count y cour t . However , Icannot af f or d l egal f ees and so t hi s i s why I ampet i t i oni ng about t he mat t er i nst ead.

Please note that there are a lot more details to all of this. I have prepared avideo which you can watch at this address https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSFNduPKi


2/14

Please note that I did not appeal at the time

(and hence not go to the tribunal) because:

1) I was considering leaving the job anyway

2) I did not know about employment tribunals

at the time

3) I was unaware of the breach of contract Inow believe the employer made with regards

to following the contractual disciplinary

procedures.


3/14

These are the letters I received before and after the disciplinary meeting.


4/14


This is the record the company have about my employment details. Please

note that my dismissal was a long time ago.


5/14

This is the solicitor's first email he sent me. You can see that there is an

attachment to this email, which is shown on the next page.

Note that the solicitor gave a different subject to the email shown here and

the letter that was attached to this email shown on the next page!


6/14

This is the solicitor's letter where he claims the correct procedures werefollowed.

Note that the subject of the letter shown here is different from the subject othe email (shown on the previous page) in which this letter was attached!

I believe the solicitor used different subjects for the email and the letter todeceive me into thinking that he was aware of things I wrote in a letterabout my attendance at the store (the letter was sent using Royal Mail'srecorded delivery service) [Please see the video I created for more details]

The solicitor glossedover the word

'disciplinary' here

[Please see the video]


7/14

s://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/supermarket-dishonesty

his is one of the solicitor's emails.

This is how the solicitor explains away the fact that

meeting in which I was dismissed was a disciplinary

meeting. It says"The employment confirmation meeting was to discuss yourperformance. Your performance was found to be unacceptable, t

meeting therefore engaged the disciplinary process. Any meeting

then comes within the disciplinary process could therefore be ref

to as a disciplinary meeting or more specifically to identify this

particular meeting the confirmation meting."

The solicitor only wrote about the supposed 'defamatory' content of my

emails and letters when I asked him why he made no mention about the

dishonesty of certain staff in his letter dated 3 August 2012 (shown on th

previous page). The solicitor carefully calculates what to mention and w

not to mention, so that he could pretend to be aware of only a selection o

my emails to customer and HR services. The solicitor failed to uphold th

rule of law and act in the best interests of his clients in his letter shown o

the previous page and so he breached some principles of the code ofconduct for solicitors. [See the video for more details about this point]

In his correspondence with me, the solicitor pretends that he

misunderstood my words when I wrote about not being given proper

notification for a disciplinary meeting. From the words indicated here,

I can say that the solicitor must have been aware of what I wrote in

the following email to customer services. [Please see the video]


8/14


Remember, the solicitor failed to defend his clients by

mentioning in his letter to me dated 3 August 2012 (shown two

pages up) that I could have defamed them and therefore the

solicitor failed to uphold the rule of law. There is a link here

with the solicitor's tactic of using different subjects for the

email and letter shown earlier. [Please see the video for more

information]


9/14

This is what the solicitor said about the issues I raised.

The company has nevertold me what issues

were addressed. Seebelow.

The answer from the solicitor here sums up why he used different subjects for the email and

letter (both shown earlier). The point I made here was directly linked to my attendance at

the store, which is what the solicitor himself wrote as the subject of this email!! This is also

one of the points that needed addressing. Yet the solicitor claims in point 12 that the

company have addressed the issues.[Please see the video for more information]

In point 9, the solicitor pretends he misunderstood my words, which should have been

crystal clear to him, given that he admits he received my emails to customer services and

HR services (discussed earlier). [See the video to understand the solicitor's attempt to

deceive me.


10/14

This is my email to another solicitor in which I attached two files.

Below are questions/points I had for the second solicitor when I made myformal complaint (above).


11/14



12/14

This is the second solicitor's response to my formal complaint. Note thatthe questions/points above were not answered.


13/14

Despite claiming that the correct procedures were followed for my

dismissal (the solicitor glossed over the word 'disciplinary' when he

said the correct procedures were followed and claimed he

'misunderstood' my words despite having received my emails to

customer and HR services, see above), the company would not give

me the Employee Handbook (which would enable me to ascertain

whether or not the employers followed the company disciplinaryprocedures) without a letter from my solicitor!

I cannot afford the legal fees I would have to pay to take the company or

the solicitor to court for breach of contract and or misconduct. The

solicitor has probably guessed that I can't afford to pay the costs of legalproceedings and so knows that by refusing to give me the Handbook, I wil

not be able to prove the breach of contract (and the company will get

away with not answering point 2, mentioned on page 1 of this document).

This email was sent almost a year after the solicitor's first email to me and

shortly before the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) replied to my

MP's letter. By then, the SRA must have contacted that solicitor and so,

he must have been aware that I reported him for the breaches he made of

the code of conduct for solicitors. The solicitor must have therefore been

referring to himself when he wrote about my intention to take action

against any colleague (the breach of contract I believe the employers made

would require taking action against the company) [See the video]


14/14

I have contacted several organisations, my local Citizens AdviceBureau and solicitors. They were either unable to provide me withhelp or charged me huge hourly rates (that I can't afford to pay) topursue my case against the company and the solicitor.

I think the company ought to answer the two questions shown on page1 of this document, otherwise the name of the company should berevealed to the British public.

Please sign my petition and share the link with your friends andfamily. Thank Youhttps://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/supermarket-dishonesty

Petition Doc

Documents

Transcript of Petition Doc