Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

22
Perspectives on Walking in an Environment Işık Barış Fidaner BM 526 Project

description

BM 526 Project. Perspectives on Walking in an Environment. Işık Barış Fidaner. BM 526 Project. ?. Human. Walking. Environment. Gait. Locomotion. A walking human being. ____ Central Nervous System. Body. Soul. Walking - Bird’s eye view. Central Nervous System (CNS). output - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

Page 1: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

Perspectives on Walkingin an Environment

Işık Barış Fidaner

BM 526 Project

Page 2: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

BM 526 Project

HumanWalkingEnvironment

?

LocomotionGait

Page 3: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

A walkinghuman being

Body Soul____Central Nervous System

Page 4: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

Walking - Bird’s eye view

Central Nervous System (CNS)

Body situated in the Environment

output channels

input channels

Page 5: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

Outputs of CNS

• Motor signals – Contract muscles to move forward while

controlling the body posture• Auxilliary signals– Movements to enhance the input – Lifting head to see your path

Page 6: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

Inputs to the CNS

• Visual– Spatiotemporal awareness to predict near future

• Audio– Musical sounds to regulate the sense of time

• External forces– Ground reactions to optimize energy consumption

• Balance– Anxiety, fear of falling to increase posture control

Page 7: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

Visual awareness

• Three phases of locomotion:1.Perception and processing

of the visual information (pp phase)

2.Execute the movement(motor phase)

3.Examine the consequences and adapt your behavior

(Meschner 2008)

Page 8: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

Visual awareness• Every pp phase must end

before corresponding motor phase begins

• Perceptions are buffered in short-term memory

(Meschner 2008)

Page 9: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

Visual awareness

• Locomotion is a complex variable behavioral contingency

• Shares same structure with other activities that require “thinking ahead” such as– Reading out loud– Dancing– Foraging

(Meschner 2008)

Page 10: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

Effect of music and rhythm

• Effect of music vs. raw metronome ranging through 50 to 190 BPM on walking vs. tapping finger, in terms of

• Synchronization– Adapting walking tempo to the music

• Spatialization– Effect on walking style, speed, step length etc.

(Styns et al. 2007)

Page 11: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

Effect of music and rhythm• Synchronization– Better sync in tapping– An optimum musical tempo exists

that maximizes sync in walking(near 120 BPM)

• Spatialization– Music makes us walk faster,

compared to raw metronome at same tempo

– An optimum walking tempo exists that maximizes step size(also near 120 BPM) (Styns et al. 2007)

Page 12: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

Resonance behavior• Step size resonates with

walking tempo • According to– fundamental frequency– damping factor

• 2 Hz (=120 BPM) resonance frequency in the long-term energy spectrum(Dougall et al. 2005)

• Spontaneous or self-selected tempo of human locomotion (Styns et al. 2007)

Page 13: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

External forces• Ground reaction force acts on

our body through feet• Body force acts on the ground

• GRF on a solid ground:– GRF does not vary with time– Muscles react to preserve body

posture• GRF on a flexible ground:

– Oscillating in vertical, anterior-posterior or lateral components

– Walking style and tempo adapts to the time dynamics of GRF

(Racic et al. May 2009)

Page 14: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

The Millennium Bridge• Opening ceremony in London, June 2000

(Racic et al. May 2009)

Page 15: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

The Millennium Bridge• Lateral oscillation up to 7 cm!• Spontaneous walking tempo– Vertical / Anterior: 2 Hz– Lateral component: 1 Hz

• Same with the bridge’s natural frequency of lateral oscillation!

• People synchronized their tempo to each other and the bridge, forming a positive feedback loop

(Racic et al. May 2009)

Page 16: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

External forces• Force plates– Records single steps

• Instrumented treadmill– Records a sequence of steps– Vertical and lateral GRF

increase with speed– Anterior GRF reaches a

maximum at 5.6 kmph (spontaneous speed)

• Time / frequency domain• Deterministic / stochastic

models(Racic et al. May 2009)

Page 17: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

Effect of anxiety, fear of falling

• Old and young subjects• Each stands on the platform– Higher or lower platform– At the edge or at the middle

• Recorded for each trial:– Galvanic skin conductance (GSC) to infer anxiety– Body center of mass (COM) and center of

pressure (COP) to estimate motor behavior

(Brown et al. 2006)

Page 18: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

Effect of anxiety, fear of falling

• Standing on the edge, or higher platforms caused:a) Increased GSC (anxiety)b) Decreased mean COM and

COP in anterior direction(leaning backwards)

c) Decreased stdev of COP and COM (more control)d) Increase in mean power frequency of COP

• (c) and (d) Increased stiffness in ankle joint

(Brown et al. 2006)

Page 19: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

Effect of anxiety, fear of falling

• No significant change dueto age difference

• Standing near height or edges causes anxiety

• Anxiety causes increasedcontrol on body posture

• Contrary to previous work, fear may be beneficial to protect one’s body from falling

(Brown et al. 2006)

Page 20: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

Conclusion:

• Buffering, spatiotemporal awareness• Resonance in step size,

optimum tempo of walking• Synchronize to structure,

positive feedback loop• Anxiety, fear of falling,

increased control

Behavioral scienceMusicology

Civil engineeringPsychology

….?

Biomechanics

Page 21: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

Conclusion:

• Different perspectives, separate disciplines

• Common object of study• Multidisciplinary studies

of walking

Human

Behavioral scienceMusicology

Civil engineeringPsychology

….?

Biomechanics

Page 22: Perspectives on Walking in an Environment

Perspectives on Walkingin an Environment

Işık Barış Fidaner

BM 526 Project