Perspectives from Industrymdepinet.org/wp-content/uploads/Van-Fleet.pdf · •Urology - Bard...
Transcript of Perspectives from Industrymdepinet.org/wp-content/uploads/Van-Fleet.pdf · •Urology - Bard...
Perspectives from IndustryRAPID Working Group
1
John Van Vleet
VP, Regulatory Affairs & Clinical Programs
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Tempe, AZ
2
• Urology
- Bard Medical Division
• Vascular
- Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
- Lutonix, Inc.
- Bard Medical Division
• Oncology
- Bard Access Systems, Inc.- Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.- Bard Biopsy- Bard Medical Division
• Surgical Specialties
- Bard Medical Division- Davol Inc.
Key Disease Management Areas by Division
23
Vascular• Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., Tempe, AZ
- Vascular Grafts- Angioplasty Catheters- Stents- Vena Cava Filters- Stent Grafts- Chronic Total Occlusion Crossing Devices
25
Bard Peripheral Vascular Focus
5
Peripheral Arterial Disease Venous Disease End-Stage Renal Disease Cancer
Confidential Information – Do not duplicate.
• Alternative Strategies for Regulatory Approvals– ISS for Indication Expansion
• Where it just fell Short– Proposal to Address 522 Requirements
• Getting Closer– Proposal for fulfill PAS Requirements
• The Future – RAPID III
Confidential Information – Do not duplicate.
Real-World Data - Bard’s Experience
• Traditional (Original) PMA’s Require Traditional Methods (i.e., pivotal study data)
• However, PMA Supplements provide opportunities for alternative strategies
– Design Modifications
– Indication Expansions
Confidential Information – Do not duplicate.
Alternative Strategies – Pre-Market
• Design Modifications
– Smaller confirmatory studies
• Indication Expansions
– Pooling of Existing Data from a Variety of Sources
– Potential Use of Registry Data (VQI, RAPID?)
– Investigator Sponsored Study (ISS)
Confidential Information – Do not duplicate.
Alternative Strategies – Continued
• Current ISS Proposal
– Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study for Indication Expansion of Vascular Stent
– Advantage of ISS: Non-biased, clinical need/question drove interest, 2 year follow-up
– Challenge: Less Oversight & Compliance (i.e., X-ray)
• Status Pending
– Perhaps use of registry core data elements would be a more streamline path for indication expansion
– Challenge: collection of non-SoC imaging • Risk Assessment – Increased Radiation Exposure vs. Device
Attribute Assessments
Confidential Information – Do not duplicate.
Investigator Sponsored Study
Background
• FDA Issues 522 Order to Filter Manufacturers
• SVS/SIR initiate PRESERVE Study
• Manufacturers choice = Own 522 Study vs PRESERVE
• Bard enrolls Denali Filter in PRESERVE
• Was there an alternative with the SNF permanent filter with over 20 years of commercial experience?
Confidential Information – Do not duplicate.
Proposed Post-Market Surveillance Plan to Address 522 Requirements
Front View T op View
Bard-Sponsored 522
• Low usage is cost and time prohibitive
VQI PSO
• Existing IVC filter module
• Imaging requirements not SoC (non-starter)
PRESERVE
• 0.7% SNF usage rate seen in the VQI registry – 15 SNF filters expected out of 2100 planned enrollments in PRESERVE – Not an Option
Confidential Information – Do not duplicate.
Options to Comply with 522 Order
• Collection of Pre-Market level imaging (non-Standard of Care) was required for ALL manufacturers
• In the end, existing registry options were not be a viable option to fulfill 522 requirements
• Completion of a traditional study would be necessary (PRESERVE not an Option)
• Conclusion, Bard withdraws a permanent filter option with over 20 years of market history
Confidential Information – Do not duplicate.
Where the Registry Option Just Fell Short
• Back to the indication expansion on a vascular stent
• PAS will be required due to novel indication
• Negotiations pending to fulfill PAS requirements with existing registry elements (VQI)
• Challenge: Real-World Standard of Care Data vs. Typical PAS Requirements (i.e., non-SoC imaging)
Confidential Information – Do not duplicate.
Getting Closer
Conclusion – Future of RAPID III
• A central set of agreed upon data elements for PAD is critical with the amount of devices available and in development
• Open collaboration between Global Regulatory Agencies, Physicians, Scientific Societies and Industry is essential
14Confidential Information – Do not duplicate.